This document is an order for protection from abuse filed in the Portland District Court of Maine. It grants a protection order to Lori Handrahan against Igor Malenko. The order prohibits Malenko from contacting or abusing Handrahan and their minor child Mila Malenko. It also awards Handrahan temporary custody of Mila and excludes Malenko from the family residence. The order is effective immediately and remains in force until further notice of the court.
This affidavit provides information in support of a motion for summary judgment. It describes the plaintiff's criminal conviction and sentence, his transfer to Dismas Charities halfway house, and the rules he agreed to follow. It states that the plaintiff drove himself to Dismas and had an unauthorized cell phone, violating the rules. As a result, his personal items were confiscated and he was returned to prison to complete his sentence.
This document is a court opinion summarizing a case involving Thomas Temperly who was convicted of operating a vehicle while intoxicated. The court addresses three issues: 1) whether sanctions under Indiana code requiring chemical testing violated Temperly's consent without probable cause; 2) whether blood test results obtained under the implied consent law were admissible in a criminal prosecution; and 3) whether sufficient evidence supported the OWI conviction. The court found that the implied consent law did not require probable cause for testing. It also found that Temperly voluntarily consented to testing and that the blood results were properly admitted. The court affirmed the OWI conviction.
This document is a reply brief filed by defendants in response to a lawsuit brought by a former inmate, Traian Bujduveanu, against his residential reentry center Dismas Charities and three employees. The defendants argue that Bujduveanu violated terms of his release from federal prison by driving without permission and possessing a cell phone. As a result, the Federal Bureau of Prisons, not the defendants, transferred Bujduveanu back to prison to complete his sentence. The defendants provide 27 undisputed facts with supporting documentation showing Bujduveanu signed forms acknowledging he would abide by rules prohibiting unauthorized driving and cell phone possession. The defendants argue they were not legally responsible for Bu
This document provides guidance on evacuation benefits and allowances for civilian employees and eligible family members of the Department of Navy in the event of an authorized or ordered departure from overseas posts in Bahrain and Japan. It addresses frequently asked questions about subsistence expense allowance, safe haven locations, travel reimbursement, and other financial benefits available during an evacuation. Key details include when allowance payments begin, the maximum duration of evacuation status, effects on differentials and allowances, accompanying family members to safe havens, and eligibility for employees and family members not yet at post or on leave at the time of evacuation.
This verified complaint alleges medical malpractice and wrongful death on behalf of parents against a hospital and doctor. It alleges the infant plaintiff received negligent medical care and treatment from defendants that caused injuries and death. The complaint brings four causes of action: 1) medical malpractice, 2) wrongful death, 3) lack of informed consent, and 4) loss of services as parents. It seeks monetary damages exceeding the jurisdiction of lower courts for each cause of action.
This document is a court judgment from the Court of Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. Barshi at Barshi, India. It details a lawsuit filed by Trimbak Aagatrao against the Grampanchayat Khandvi and several individuals. The plaintiff claimed ownership of the disputed land and sought an order directing the Grampanchayat to record his name and an injunction preventing obstruction of his possession. The court examined documents establishing the plaintiff's title and found in his favor, directing the Grampanchayat to record his name and restraining the other defendants from obstructing his possession. Costs were not awarded to either party to prevent further conflict.
This affidavit provides information in support of a motion for summary judgment. It describes the plaintiff's criminal conviction and sentence, his transfer to Dismas Charities halfway house, and the rules he agreed to follow. It states that the plaintiff drove himself to Dismas and had an unauthorized cell phone, violating the rules. As a result, his personal items were confiscated and he was returned to prison to complete his sentence.
This document is a court opinion summarizing a case involving Thomas Temperly who was convicted of operating a vehicle while intoxicated. The court addresses three issues: 1) whether sanctions under Indiana code requiring chemical testing violated Temperly's consent without probable cause; 2) whether blood test results obtained under the implied consent law were admissible in a criminal prosecution; and 3) whether sufficient evidence supported the OWI conviction. The court found that the implied consent law did not require probable cause for testing. It also found that Temperly voluntarily consented to testing and that the blood results were properly admitted. The court affirmed the OWI conviction.
This document is a reply brief filed by defendants in response to a lawsuit brought by a former inmate, Traian Bujduveanu, against his residential reentry center Dismas Charities and three employees. The defendants argue that Bujduveanu violated terms of his release from federal prison by driving without permission and possessing a cell phone. As a result, the Federal Bureau of Prisons, not the defendants, transferred Bujduveanu back to prison to complete his sentence. The defendants provide 27 undisputed facts with supporting documentation showing Bujduveanu signed forms acknowledging he would abide by rules prohibiting unauthorized driving and cell phone possession. The defendants argue they were not legally responsible for Bu
This document provides guidance on evacuation benefits and allowances for civilian employees and eligible family members of the Department of Navy in the event of an authorized or ordered departure from overseas posts in Bahrain and Japan. It addresses frequently asked questions about subsistence expense allowance, safe haven locations, travel reimbursement, and other financial benefits available during an evacuation. Key details include when allowance payments begin, the maximum duration of evacuation status, effects on differentials and allowances, accompanying family members to safe havens, and eligibility for employees and family members not yet at post or on leave at the time of evacuation.
This verified complaint alleges medical malpractice and wrongful death on behalf of parents against a hospital and doctor. It alleges the infant plaintiff received negligent medical care and treatment from defendants that caused injuries and death. The complaint brings four causes of action: 1) medical malpractice, 2) wrongful death, 3) lack of informed consent, and 4) loss of services as parents. It seeks monetary damages exceeding the jurisdiction of lower courts for each cause of action.
This document is a court judgment from the Court of Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. Barshi at Barshi, India. It details a lawsuit filed by Trimbak Aagatrao against the Grampanchayat Khandvi and several individuals. The plaintiff claimed ownership of the disputed land and sought an order directing the Grampanchayat to record his name and an injunction preventing obstruction of his possession. The court examined documents establishing the plaintiff's title and found in his favor, directing the Grampanchayat to record his name and restraining the other defendants from obstructing his possession. Costs were not awarded to either party to prevent further conflict.
This document outlines Georgia law regarding the carrying of weapons without a license. It specifies that individuals not prohibited by law may carry weapons on their own property, in their vehicles, and at their place of business without a license. It also allows the carrying of unloaded weapons in cases. The document further outlines licensing requirements, exceptions, locations where carrying is prohibited, and penalties for violations.
This document is a summons filed in the Federal High Court of Nigeria by Mallam Sanusi Lamido Sanusi against the Financial Reporting Council of Nigeria and its Executive Secretary. Sanusi claims that the FRCN acted beyond its statutory powers and violated his right to fair hearing by recommending his removal as Governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria without allowing him to respond to allegations. He is seeking declarations and orders relating to the FRCN's investigation and its recommendations to the President regarding his position at the CBN. The summons is supported by an affidavit detailing the background and Sanusi's claims against the FRCN.
Preliminary matters to be considered before commencing a civil suitIntan Muhammad
Contents :
Cause of Action
Locus Standi
Limitation Period
Jurisdiction of Court & Mode of beginning (in s separate note, namely bidang kuasa sivil mahkamah2 di malaysia)
P/S : I am sharing my personal notes of law-related subjects. Some parts of them are explained in a very informal-relaxed way and mix of languages (BM and English). Secondly, as law revolves every day, there will be outdated parts in my notes. Two ways of handling it.. (1) double check with the latest law and keep it to yourself (2) same with No. 1 coupled with your generosity to share with us, the LinkedIn users (hiks ^_^). Till then, have a nice day!
This document is a transcript from a pretrial detention hearing for defendants Hassan Keshari and Traian Bujduveanu. The government alleges that Keshari brokered the export of military aircraft parts from the U.S. to Iran, obtaining the parts from suppliers like Bujduveanu. Parts were shipped from the U.S. to Dubai and then to Iran. Neither defendant had licenses to export munitions list items or defense articles to Iran. The government argued the defendants should be detained pretrial due to risk of flight.
This document is an affidavit in support of a motion for summary judgment. It was signed by Ana Gispert, the director of Dismas Charities in Hollywood, Florida. The affidavit describes the rules and regulations plaintiff Traian Bujduveanu agreed to follow as a participant in the Dismas halfway house program, including prohibitions on unauthorized cell phone use and driving without permission. It states that on October 13, 2010 plaintiff violated these rules by driving himself to Dismas and possessing an unauthorized cell phone, and was then taken back into federal custody to complete his sentence. The affidavit includes several exhibits, such as signed acknowledgement forms and program materials.
This document contains regulations related to citizenship, immigration, and passes in Kenya. Some key points:
- It outlines regulations for regaining or renouncing Kenyan citizenship, as well as applying for citizenship by registration.
- Regulations are provided for passports, including who is entitled to diplomatic passports.
- Detailed regulations are given for immigration control, including requirements for entry, departure, visas, permanent residence, and work/residence permits.
- Regulations authorize immigration officers to issue various passes, such as student, visitor, or transit passes, and allow terms and conditions to be specified in the passes issued.
This affidavit was submitted in support of a motion for summary judgment. It was signed by Ana Gispert, the director of the Dismas Charities facility in Hollywood, Florida. The affidavit describes the plaintiff's guilty plea and sentence for conspiring to illegally export military parts to Iran. It details the rules and regulations plaintiff agreed to follow as part of his placement at Dismas Charities halfway house, including prohibitions on unauthorized cell phone use and driving. The affidavit alleges plaintiff violated these rules in October 2010 by driving himself to Dismas Charities and being found in possession of an unauthorized cell phone, leading to his termination from the program and transfer back to prison to serve the remainder of his sentence.
Lori Handrahan wrote a letter to Deb Rand responding to Rand's claim that Handrahan did not provide an original signature on her check or evidence that she ordered a transcript from the court. Handrahan resends a copy of the bank check mailed before the deadline and encloses a copy of her signature from her passport and an original signature signed before a notary. She also informs Rand that she has requested the Criminal Division of the Department of Justice investigate Judge Moskowitz and the clerks for their apparent role in corruption at the court.
The document discusses the benefits of exercise for mental health. Regular physical activity can help reduce anxiety and depression and improve mood and cognitive function. Exercise causes chemical changes in the brain that may help protect against mental illness and improve symptoms for those who already suffer from conditions like anxiety and depression.
9 july 2011 bar filling against waxman includes all the cummings emails and m...DocumentsforMila
An attorney, Michael Waxman, is accused of multiple ethical violations and possible criminal acts in his representation of a client, Igor Malenko, during a child custody dispute. Waxman is accused of fabricating an official document from DHHS to deny the mother, Lori Handrahan, unsupervised visits with her daughter and influencing a judge. Handrahan files an official complaint with the Overseers of the Bar, providing a transcript and recordings from an encounter with police as evidence of Waxman's misrepresentations. She requests the Bar investigate and hold Waxman accountable for his actions.
The letter provides a complaint against attorney Michael Waxman for allegedly abusing his power and using his law license to destroy the complainant, Lori Handrahan, and her daughter over the past three years. The letter alleges that Waxman is currently holding Handrahan's daughter hostage despite a court order granting joint custody. The letter also alleges that Waxman falsified a public document claiming Handrahan was under supervised visits and lied to police. The letter requests the Overseers of the Bar investigate Waxman's actions.
Meth lab result 56ng of meth in mila's urine nms lab april 2010DocumentsforMila
This toxicology report provides the following key information in 3 sentences:
The report found methamphetamine at 66 ng/mL and theobromine in Mila Malenko's urine sample. It also detected methamphetamine in her hair through ELISA testing. The methamphetamine ratio indicated it was the result of using the Schedule II stimulant d-methamphetamine.
This letter from the Cumberland County District Attorney's Office informs Ms. Handrahan that the case of State of Maine vs. Igor Malenko has been finalized. It provides the docket number of the case and notes that it is from the Cumberland County District Attorney's Office located in Portland, Maine. The letter serves to notify Ms. Handrahan of the outcome or resolution of the legal case involving Igor Malenko.
This order addresses a motion to modify parenting arrangements due to the mother's relocation for a new job in Washington D.C. The judge denies the mother's request, finding her testimony not credible. The judge finds the father's testimony credible and corroborated by evidence. The judge also finds that an effective co-parenting relationship has never developed and the mother refuses or is unable to co-parent with the father, as demonstrated by her past unilateral actions in violation of the divorce judgment. The best interests of the child require abating parental conflict and ensuring her continued meaningful engagement with both parents individually.
Mr. Waxman, the lawyer of Lori Handrahan's ex-husband, has systematically threatened to sue, prosecute, or investigate Lori, her daughter's caregivers, doctors, lawyers, and anyone else involved in her life. As a result, Lori has lost reliable childcare and her daughter's doctor, costing her employment. She has also incurred over $200,000 in legal fees and been isolated. Lori believes Mr. Waxman's actions constitute legal stalking under Maine law, as he has engaged in a course of conduct directed at her and others that would cause serious emotional distress or inconvenience to a reasonable person. She is requesting the District Attorney investigate Mr. Wax
The document discusses the benefits of exercise for mental health. Regular physical activity can help reduce anxiety and depression and improve mood and cognitive function. Exercise causes chemical changes in the brain that may help protect against mental illness and improve symptoms for those who already suffer from conditions like anxiety and depression.
Michael Waxman, an attorney, is being complained about for the third time to the Board of Overseers of the Bar for openly violating a court order and engaging in criminal contempt of court. During a custody hearing, Waxman screamed at the judge that he would not uphold a joint custody order and would not let law enforcement take the child from him. He also threatened to sue the DA to prevent criminal charges against him for contempt of court. The complainant requests that the Board remove Waxman's law license and call the FBI due to his criminal behavior and abuse of his law license.
The document discusses the benefits of exercise for mental health. Regular physical activity can help reduce anxiety and depression and improve mood and cognitive functioning. Exercise causes chemical changes in the brain that may help boost feelings of calmness, happiness and focus.
Five witness statements to federal obstruction of justice waxman & malenko 2012DocumentsforMila
Michael Waxman, an attorney, is accused of criminal contempt of court for his behavior at a January 31st hearing regarding visitation rights. According to multiple witnesses, Waxman yelled at and pointed his finger at the presiding judge, refusing to obey a court order regarding visitation and threatening to not allow the child's mother to see her. Waxman is also accused of making threatening comments towards the child's mother and her attorney after the hearing adjourned. Previous incidents are described where Waxman misled police and told others the mother's visits had to be supervised, contrary to court orders. Concerns are raised about Waxman and his client disregarding visitation orders and threatening criminal charges against
The letter requests that the Chief Judge reconsider investigating the conduct of GAL Liz Stout. It cites several sections of Maine GAL law that indicate the Chief Judge has authority to conduct reviews and regulate or remove Guardians from cases. Specifically, the law allows for ongoing oversight of Guardians, reviews in response to complaints whether a case is pending or not, and emergency removal of a Guardian if in the best interests of the judicial branch. The letter argues that Ms. Stout's conduct, including acknowledging risk of abuse but recommending joint custody resulting in the child's abuse, merits investigation and potential removal under the law.
This document outlines Georgia law regarding the carrying of weapons without a license. It specifies that individuals not prohibited by law may carry weapons on their own property, in their vehicles, and at their place of business without a license. It also allows the carrying of unloaded weapons in cases. The document further outlines licensing requirements, exceptions, locations where carrying is prohibited, and penalties for violations.
This document is a summons filed in the Federal High Court of Nigeria by Mallam Sanusi Lamido Sanusi against the Financial Reporting Council of Nigeria and its Executive Secretary. Sanusi claims that the FRCN acted beyond its statutory powers and violated his right to fair hearing by recommending his removal as Governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria without allowing him to respond to allegations. He is seeking declarations and orders relating to the FRCN's investigation and its recommendations to the President regarding his position at the CBN. The summons is supported by an affidavit detailing the background and Sanusi's claims against the FRCN.
Preliminary matters to be considered before commencing a civil suitIntan Muhammad
Contents :
Cause of Action
Locus Standi
Limitation Period
Jurisdiction of Court & Mode of beginning (in s separate note, namely bidang kuasa sivil mahkamah2 di malaysia)
P/S : I am sharing my personal notes of law-related subjects. Some parts of them are explained in a very informal-relaxed way and mix of languages (BM and English). Secondly, as law revolves every day, there will be outdated parts in my notes. Two ways of handling it.. (1) double check with the latest law and keep it to yourself (2) same with No. 1 coupled with your generosity to share with us, the LinkedIn users (hiks ^_^). Till then, have a nice day!
This document is a transcript from a pretrial detention hearing for defendants Hassan Keshari and Traian Bujduveanu. The government alleges that Keshari brokered the export of military aircraft parts from the U.S. to Iran, obtaining the parts from suppliers like Bujduveanu. Parts were shipped from the U.S. to Dubai and then to Iran. Neither defendant had licenses to export munitions list items or defense articles to Iran. The government argued the defendants should be detained pretrial due to risk of flight.
This document is an affidavit in support of a motion for summary judgment. It was signed by Ana Gispert, the director of Dismas Charities in Hollywood, Florida. The affidavit describes the rules and regulations plaintiff Traian Bujduveanu agreed to follow as a participant in the Dismas halfway house program, including prohibitions on unauthorized cell phone use and driving without permission. It states that on October 13, 2010 plaintiff violated these rules by driving himself to Dismas and possessing an unauthorized cell phone, and was then taken back into federal custody to complete his sentence. The affidavit includes several exhibits, such as signed acknowledgement forms and program materials.
This document contains regulations related to citizenship, immigration, and passes in Kenya. Some key points:
- It outlines regulations for regaining or renouncing Kenyan citizenship, as well as applying for citizenship by registration.
- Regulations are provided for passports, including who is entitled to diplomatic passports.
- Detailed regulations are given for immigration control, including requirements for entry, departure, visas, permanent residence, and work/residence permits.
- Regulations authorize immigration officers to issue various passes, such as student, visitor, or transit passes, and allow terms and conditions to be specified in the passes issued.
This affidavit was submitted in support of a motion for summary judgment. It was signed by Ana Gispert, the director of the Dismas Charities facility in Hollywood, Florida. The affidavit describes the plaintiff's guilty plea and sentence for conspiring to illegally export military parts to Iran. It details the rules and regulations plaintiff agreed to follow as part of his placement at Dismas Charities halfway house, including prohibitions on unauthorized cell phone use and driving. The affidavit alleges plaintiff violated these rules in October 2010 by driving himself to Dismas Charities and being found in possession of an unauthorized cell phone, leading to his termination from the program and transfer back to prison to serve the remainder of his sentence.
Lori Handrahan wrote a letter to Deb Rand responding to Rand's claim that Handrahan did not provide an original signature on her check or evidence that she ordered a transcript from the court. Handrahan resends a copy of the bank check mailed before the deadline and encloses a copy of her signature from her passport and an original signature signed before a notary. She also informs Rand that she has requested the Criminal Division of the Department of Justice investigate Judge Moskowitz and the clerks for their apparent role in corruption at the court.
The document discusses the benefits of exercise for mental health. Regular physical activity can help reduce anxiety and depression and improve mood and cognitive function. Exercise causes chemical changes in the brain that may help protect against mental illness and improve symptoms for those who already suffer from conditions like anxiety and depression.
9 july 2011 bar filling against waxman includes all the cummings emails and m...DocumentsforMila
An attorney, Michael Waxman, is accused of multiple ethical violations and possible criminal acts in his representation of a client, Igor Malenko, during a child custody dispute. Waxman is accused of fabricating an official document from DHHS to deny the mother, Lori Handrahan, unsupervised visits with her daughter and influencing a judge. Handrahan files an official complaint with the Overseers of the Bar, providing a transcript and recordings from an encounter with police as evidence of Waxman's misrepresentations. She requests the Bar investigate and hold Waxman accountable for his actions.
The letter provides a complaint against attorney Michael Waxman for allegedly abusing his power and using his law license to destroy the complainant, Lori Handrahan, and her daughter over the past three years. The letter alleges that Waxman is currently holding Handrahan's daughter hostage despite a court order granting joint custody. The letter also alleges that Waxman falsified a public document claiming Handrahan was under supervised visits and lied to police. The letter requests the Overseers of the Bar investigate Waxman's actions.
Meth lab result 56ng of meth in mila's urine nms lab april 2010DocumentsforMila
This toxicology report provides the following key information in 3 sentences:
The report found methamphetamine at 66 ng/mL and theobromine in Mila Malenko's urine sample. It also detected methamphetamine in her hair through ELISA testing. The methamphetamine ratio indicated it was the result of using the Schedule II stimulant d-methamphetamine.
This letter from the Cumberland County District Attorney's Office informs Ms. Handrahan that the case of State of Maine vs. Igor Malenko has been finalized. It provides the docket number of the case and notes that it is from the Cumberland County District Attorney's Office located in Portland, Maine. The letter serves to notify Ms. Handrahan of the outcome or resolution of the legal case involving Igor Malenko.
This order addresses a motion to modify parenting arrangements due to the mother's relocation for a new job in Washington D.C. The judge denies the mother's request, finding her testimony not credible. The judge finds the father's testimony credible and corroborated by evidence. The judge also finds that an effective co-parenting relationship has never developed and the mother refuses or is unable to co-parent with the father, as demonstrated by her past unilateral actions in violation of the divorce judgment. The best interests of the child require abating parental conflict and ensuring her continued meaningful engagement with both parents individually.
Mr. Waxman, the lawyer of Lori Handrahan's ex-husband, has systematically threatened to sue, prosecute, or investigate Lori, her daughter's caregivers, doctors, lawyers, and anyone else involved in her life. As a result, Lori has lost reliable childcare and her daughter's doctor, costing her employment. She has also incurred over $200,000 in legal fees and been isolated. Lori believes Mr. Waxman's actions constitute legal stalking under Maine law, as he has engaged in a course of conduct directed at her and others that would cause serious emotional distress or inconvenience to a reasonable person. She is requesting the District Attorney investigate Mr. Wax
The document discusses the benefits of exercise for mental health. Regular physical activity can help reduce anxiety and depression and improve mood and cognitive function. Exercise causes chemical changes in the brain that may help protect against mental illness and improve symptoms for those who already suffer from conditions like anxiety and depression.
Michael Waxman, an attorney, is being complained about for the third time to the Board of Overseers of the Bar for openly violating a court order and engaging in criminal contempt of court. During a custody hearing, Waxman screamed at the judge that he would not uphold a joint custody order and would not let law enforcement take the child from him. He also threatened to sue the DA to prevent criminal charges against him for contempt of court. The complainant requests that the Board remove Waxman's law license and call the FBI due to his criminal behavior and abuse of his law license.
The document discusses the benefits of exercise for mental health. Regular physical activity can help reduce anxiety and depression and improve mood and cognitive functioning. Exercise causes chemical changes in the brain that may help boost feelings of calmness, happiness and focus.
Five witness statements to federal obstruction of justice waxman & malenko 2012DocumentsforMila
Michael Waxman, an attorney, is accused of criminal contempt of court for his behavior at a January 31st hearing regarding visitation rights. According to multiple witnesses, Waxman yelled at and pointed his finger at the presiding judge, refusing to obey a court order regarding visitation and threatening to not allow the child's mother to see her. Waxman is also accused of making threatening comments towards the child's mother and her attorney after the hearing adjourned. Previous incidents are described where Waxman misled police and told others the mother's visits had to be supervised, contrary to court orders. Concerns are raised about Waxman and his client disregarding visitation orders and threatening criminal charges against
The letter requests that the Chief Judge reconsider investigating the conduct of GAL Liz Stout. It cites several sections of Maine GAL law that indicate the Chief Judge has authority to conduct reviews and regulate or remove Guardians from cases. Specifically, the law allows for ongoing oversight of Guardians, reviews in response to complaints whether a case is pending or not, and emergency removal of a Guardian if in the best interests of the judicial branch. The letter argues that Ms. Stout's conduct, including acknowledging risk of abuse but recommending joint custody resulting in the child's abuse, merits investigation and potential removal under the law.
This document summarizes communications between Dr. Carl Baum, a pediatric toxicologist, and individuals involved in a child protection case regarding a girl named Mila Malenko. Dr. Baum provided an affidavit stating that methamphetamines were found in Mila's urine in an amount that should not occur and has not been explained. Despite this, the child protection investigation was closed without action. Dr. Baum confirms that he stands by his original assessment and has not changed his opinion. Concerns are raised that the investigation was inadequate and misrepresented Dr. Baum's statements, putting the child at risk of harm.
A 3-year-old girl disclosed to her nurse practitioner that her father sexually abuses her on weekends when she is in his custody. During an exam, no physical signs of abuse were found but the child became distressed when discussing the abuse. The nurse practitioner reported the allegation to child protective services and arranged for the child to be evaluated before returning to her father's custody that weekend.
The document discusses the results of a study on the effects of exercise on memory and thinking abilities in older adults. The study found that regular exercise can help reduce the decline in thinking abilities that often occurs with age. Specifically, older adults who exercised regularly performed better on memory and thinking tests compared to those who did not exercise regularly.
Devoe notes on harassment of lori handrahan by michael waxmanDocumentsforMila
Mr. Waxman engaged in a pattern of intimidating behavior directed at Lori Handrahan and others involved in her legal case, intended to cause fear and control the situation. This included threats, relentless legal actions, attempts to damage reputations, and inappropriate personal interest in Handrahan's daughter. As a result, Handrahan experienced extreme fear, anxiety, and felt unsafe and without protection. Several attorneys and supporters withdrew from the case due to intimidation by Waxman, leaving Handrahan without resources.
WATERSHED: Trillion-Dollar Lawsuit Could End Financial TyrannyZurich Files
WATERSHED: Trillion-Dollar Lawsuit Could End Financial Tyranny -- lawsuit against UN, OITC, WEF, Italian Republic and related parties. Keenan complaint, 2011-Nov-23. Also headlined as: "CONFIRMED: The Trillion-Dollar Lawsuit That Could End Financial Tyranny".
This document is a complaint filed in a civil action in United States District Court. It alleges an international conspiracy to defraud Neil Keenan, the designated agent of the Dragon Family, by stealing negotiable financial instruments worth over $1 trillion that had been lawfully owned and entrusted to Keenan. The complaint names 16 defendants and seeks damages for the stolen instruments.
This document is a complaint filed in a United States District Court alleging an international conspiracy to defraud Neil Keenan, the agent of the Dragon Family, out of financial instruments worth over $1 trillion that were intended to be used for humanitarian purposes. The complaint names numerous individuals and organizations, including foreign governments and officials, as defendants in the lawsuit and alleges they worked together to steal negotiable financial instruments lawfully owned by the Dragon Family and entrusted to Keenan in 2009. The complaint seeks damages and demands a jury trial for applicable claims.
BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF AMENDED PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL WITH SANCTIONSAlvin Sutherlin, Jr
This document is a brief in support of a motion to compel the production of body camera footage and related records from a 2013 police incident. It alleges that key exculpatory footage was withheld from the plaintiff during criminal proceedings, in violation of discovery obligations and his civil rights. It requests that the court order the defendants to produce unedited body camera footage and audit records to identify all footage from the named officers involved in the incident.
This document discusses three types of intellectual property remedies: Anton Piller orders, Mareva injunctions, and John Doe orders. An Anton Piller order allows a plaintiff to enter a defendant's premises and seize allegedly infringing goods and documents. A Mareva injunction prevents a defendant from disposing of assets to avoid a potential judgment. A John Doe order is a representative order against an identifiable class of defendants that permits seizure of allegedly infringing goods. All three remedies require a serious legal question and a balance of convenience favoring the rights owner.
This document provides an introduction to the topic of nuisance in tort law. It defines nuisance as a branch of law that protects landowners from unreasonable interference with the use of their land. There are two types of nuisance: public nuisance, which affects the rights of the general public, and private nuisance, which disturbs a private individual's use and enjoyment of their property.
The document outlines the elements that must be proven for a private nuisance claim, including that the interference was substantial and unreasonable. It examines factors like the location of the properties and whether the defendant's actions provide a public benefit. Case examples are provided to illustrate how courts have interpreted and applied the legal principles of nuisance.
Similar to Igor's nolo contende to domestic abuse 2008 (6)
The document discusses the benefits of exercise for mental health. Regular physical activity can help reduce anxiety and depression and improve mood and cognitive functioning. Exercise causes chemical changes in the brain that may help protect against mental illness and improve symptoms.
The document summarizes a letter from the Board of Overseers of the Bar regarding a grievance complaint against attorney Michael J. Waxman. A Grievance Commission panel found probable cause that Waxman engaged in misconduct subject to sanction. The office of Bar Counsel will now prepare a formal petition for disciplinary proceedings against Waxman before a different Grievance Commission panel. Both the complainant, Lori Handrahan, and Waxman will receive notice of the disciplinary hearing date.
Overseers of the bar grievance panel waxman bar nov 5 2009DocumentsforMila
The Board of Overseers of the Bar is established by the Maine Supreme Judicial Court to regulate attorney conduct. The Board has several members and staff, including an Executive Director and Bar Counsel. In this letter, the Bar Counsel notifies Lori Handrahan and attorney Michael J. Waxman that a Grievance Commission panel found probable cause that Waxman engaged in misconduct subject to sanction. As a result, Bar Counsel will prepare a formal petition for disciplinary proceedings before a new Grievance Commission panel regarding grievance complaint 09-204.
The document is a letter from the Board of Overseers of the Bar notifying Lori Handrahan and Peter Rodway, Esq. that a Grievance Commission panel reviewed a complaint regarding attorney Michael Waxman and dismissed it with a warning. The panel found that Waxman became personally involved in a client's case, maligned Handrahan, and threatened another attorney, but that the misconduct was minor. As a result, the complaint was dismissed and Waxman was warned to refrain from such behavior in the future. The letter notes that a dismissal with warning is confidential and not a formal discipline.
This letter requests that Judge Bradley take judicial notice of recent police reports when considering the credibility determinations made in a prior divorce judgment. The letter references a police report where the ex-husband, Mr. Malenko, is shown shoplifting on video with his three-year-old daughter but continues to lie to the police about it. The letter asks Judge Bradley to weigh this new evidence of Mr. Malenko lying against the prior finding that he was credible and the ex-wife was not credible.
The document discusses the benefits of exercise for mental health. Regular physical activity can help reduce anxiety and depression and improve mood and cognitive functioning. Exercise stimulates the production of endorphins in the brain which elevate mood and reduce stress levels.
Lesley devoe reply to dean crocker maine children's allianceDocumentsforMila
The document is a letter from Lesley Devoe, LCSW to Dean Crocker, MSW regarding the case of Lori Handrahan and Igor Malenko. It summarizes in great detail discrepancies in Igor Malenko's statements to various professionals involved in the case regarding his history of violence, parenting abilities, and truthfulness. It raises concerns that Mr. Malenko has provided misinformation that has influenced the case's momentum against Ms. Handrahan and that professionals have overlooked serious red flags in Mr. Malenko's background and behavior.
The document discusses the authority of a governor to intervene in a child protective services case. It provides opinions from legal experts that a governor, as the head of the executive branch, has the power to direct actions by executive agencies and appoint/remove agency heads. The document also examines Maine's constitution and case law, finding that governors have a duty to ensure laws are faithfully executed and oversee the executive branch. It concludes that the Maine governor has the authority to order the DHHS to substantiate abuse findings and follow an expert organization's recommendations in the child's case.
Judy potter's letter to gov le page final july 2011DocumentsforMila
Judy Potter, an attorney, writes to Governor LePage with concerns about the Maine DHHS's handling of the case of Mila Malenko. Potter questions why the conclusions of a psychological evaluation from Spurwink were dismissed by DHHS. Potter also raises issues with inconsistent statements from DHHS officials about the reasons for rejecting the Spurwink report and allegations of coaching. Potter believes DHHS notified parties of its conclusions at different times inappropriately and questions the basis for closing the case without a full investigation.
The expert witness, Dr. Jacquelyn C. Campbell, provides a 3-paragraph summary of her expert opinion in the case of Malenko vs. Handrahan (Docket No. FM-08-510). She administered a validated danger assessment to the defendant, Lori Handrahan, and scored her at an "extreme danger" level of 22. Based on research, Dr. Campbell can predict with 92% accuracy that Ms. Handrahan is at extreme risk of being killed or almost killed by the plaintiff, Igor Malenko. Furthermore, any custody arrangement that allows unsupervised access puts the child, Mila, at risk of harm or trauma. Therefore, Dr. Campbell strongly
1. FOR YOulZ RECORDS
STATE OF MAINE
Location PORTLAND DISTRICT COURT
Docket No. PORDC-PA-2008-00605
•..•...
LORI M HANDRAHAN ORDER FOR PROTECTION
V. FROM ABUSE
19-A M.R.S.A. section 4007
IGOR MALENKO
After due notice and ~ opportunity for full hearing [] full hearing on the merits
of the complaint for Protection from Abuse, the following parties being present:
~ Plaintiff ~ Defendant,
THE COURT FINDS THAT: (only checked boxes apply)
~ (1) The parties are family or household members;
[] (2) The parties are dating partners or plaintiff is a victim of defendant's
sexual assault or stalking.
[] (3) The plaintiff was abused by the defendant;
[] (4) The defendant presents a credible threat to the physical safety of the
plaintiff/minor child(ren);
~ (5) The parties have agreed to the following Order, which is made without findings
of abuse.
THEREFORE, it is hereby ORDERED THAT:
~ (A-1) The defendant is prohibited from threatening, assaulting, molesting, attacking,
harassing or otherwise abusing the plaintiff and any minor child(ren) residing in
the household.
~ (A-2) The defendant is prohibited from the use, attemped use or threatened use of
physical force that would reasonably be expected to cause bodily injury against
the plaintiff or a minor child residing in the household.
~ (B) The defendant is prohibited from having any contact, direct or indirect with
p~aintiff
~ Except contact permitted in paragraph I and/or 0 below
[] Except
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
~ (C) The defendant is prohibited from going upon the premises of the plaintiff's
residence.
~ (D) The defendant is restrained from, repeatedly and without reasonable cause,
following the plaintiff.
~ (E) The defendant is restrained from, repeatedly and without reasonable cause, being at
or in the vicinity of the plaintiff's home, school, business or place of employment.
~ (F) The defendant is prohibited from possession of a firearm or other dangerous weapon.
~ (G) The plaintiff is granted possession of and the defendant is excluded forthwith and
prohibited from entering the residence at 28 FRANKLIN TERRACE, SOUTH PORTLAND ME
[&J (H)
~ leclvt.
and is entered: '<>7 II .~~- ••••.
~ (I) The plaintiff is awarded temporary parental rights and responsibilities (custody)
of minor child (ren) , whose names and dates of birth are as follows: _
!l1dCl. 1'1a.er1ko, diD)) JI/;J..q/ow
The defendant's rights
-5lc.. oc.c.I,...l-
O~ -per-50/
.she,- 0. ~o k
PA-009, ~v. 08/2007 #..'!ire o[ re.
I.....e.Sc1.~f <!r 7/1.••.rJc c..y
2. Location PORTLAND DISTRICT COURT
Docket No. PORDC-PA-2008-00605
<,
-- ~-.--
VIOLATION OF AN ORDER CONTAINED IN PARAGRAPHS (A) THROUGH (I) IS
ALWAYS A CLASS Dr AND SOMETIMES A CLASS C CRIME.
POSSESSION OF A FIREARM OR. AMMuNITION WHILE THIS ORDER IS IN EFFECT
IS PROHIBITED UNDER FEDERAL AND/OR STATE LAW IF ANY ONE OR MORE OF
THE FOLLOWING BOXES HAVE BEEN CHECKED: A-I, A-2, OR F.
It is further ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: (only checked boxes apply)
[] (J) The defendant shall pay child support pursuant to the attached child support
order.
~ (K)
[] (L) per (week) (month) toward the support of
~ (M) The with or destroying plaintiff's property.
[] (N) The goods are divided as follows:
and the following order for protection of property is entered: _
~ (0)
~(P)
I/)Ih(o,o,:t<...y , 'tu ti.J CGUy£L', W~O Sh",,11 n,,€I' 1'I?v'lS1t'1 TftYM tv tJ'lf Otic, . I...t2"....:x1U-ct-,
as a direct result of the abuse,
[] (S) The (defendant) (plaintiff) pay to
--------------------------
the sum of $ as counsel fees; the sum of $ as court costs.
Payment is to be made within days, execution to issue.
~ (T) No child support order is issued at this time (but will be ±.~.~t""tl AR ,.,eo"" ilk 11,,=·
=:::e O:;:::t:::i:::!~,s::o::tf!~::r~~;tj~~~r"n* 16fflly (h~~+kr,
f!!:r: ~~±:d : I
WARNING: VIOLATION OF PARAGRAPHS "J" THROUGH "T" MAY BE CONTEMPT OF
COURT. THESE PARAGRAPHS ARE ALSO ENFORCEABLE AS A CIVIL JUDGMENT.
WARNING TO THE DEFENDANT: AS LONG AS THIS ORDER IS IN EFFECT, YOU
MUST OBEY IT. NO ONE, INCLUDING THE PLAINTIFF, CAN GIVE YOU
PERMISSION TO VIOLATE THE PROVISIONS OF THIS ORDER.
This order is effective forthwith and shall remain in
force and effect until ~w~h~w~/~3~O~lO=_ _
unless earlier modified or vacated by order of court or, with respect to Child Support
or Parental Rights and Responsibilities, by a Case Management Officer. It is ORDERED
that a copy of this Order be served in hand on the defendant by the following law
enforcement agency: _
PA-009, Rev. 08/2007 Page 2 of 3
3. Location PORTLAND DISTRICT COURT
Docket No. PORDC-PA-2008-0060S
<, .:
Copies of this order shall be furnished by the clerk to the law enforcement agency with
jurisdiction in the location of the plaintiff's residence.
This Order is incorporated into the docket by reference pursuant to M.R.Civ.p 79(a).
Date: &/&/0 g
/ -I
~iatl.:,!:·:~;~t:it~?!2~t0
--.= rDepilty) Clerk
********************************************************************************************
PA-009, Rev. 08/2007 Page 3 of 3
4. STATE OF MAINE
Location PORTLAND DISTRICT COURT
Docket No. PORDC-PA-2008-00605
,...... .. , .
LORI M HANDRAHAN ORDER PROHIBITING
V. POSSESSION AND REQUIRING
RELINQUISHMENT
IGOR MALENKO OF FIREARMS AND WEAPONS
(19-A MRSA Section 4006,4007)
Based on the complaint and/or the Final Order, the defendant is prohibited from
possessing any firearms and the dangerous weapon(s) described below for the duration of
the [] Temporary [] Final Order in this case.
Within [] 24 hours [] hours after service of this Order, Defendant is ordered to
relinquish all firearms and any dangerous weapons listed below in the Defendant's
possession to a law enforcement officer or other individual for the duration of the order.
Description of dangerous weapons prohibited and to be relinquished: _
If the firearms and/or weapons are relinquished to an individual other than a law
enforcement officer, the defendant must, within 24 hours after such relinquishment,
/,
complete the Notice below and file it with the [] court or [] local law enforcement agency
designated in the order.
Date: tt/IP/6lC
NOTICE OF RELINQUISHMENT OF WEAPONS
The firearm(s) and/or dangerous weapon(s) listed above have been relinquished to an
individual whose name and address is:
The firearm(s) and/or dangerous weapon(s) relinquished to the above named individual
are: (List each item relinquished and describe. Attach separate paper if necessary.)
This notice is being filed with [] the court [] the law enforcement agency designated
in the order, within 24 hours after said relinquishment.
Date:
Defendant
PA-016, Rev. 09/03 Page 1 of 1
5. Reset Form
STATE OF,MAINE DISTRICT COURT
Location Portland
Docket No. _
Plaintiff: Lori M. Handrahan
o individually and on behalf of:
COMPLAINT FOR PROTECTION
[!I on behalf of: FROM ABUSE
Mila Malenko (19-A M.R.S.A. §§ 4003 et seq.)
v.
Defendant: Igor Malenko
o on behalf of:
--------------------
1. Plaintiff information: Full name: ....:L::.:o:::.!r~i
~M:..:;a::::.y.L!..H.!!a:!!n~d:!!rC!::a~h!!:a:!!n.!..._
__ ~ _
Gender: 0 Female 0 Male Date of birth: 05/30/1969
Present street address, city and telephone number: (list only your name if address is to be kept confidential and complete
form PA-015, Affidavit for Confidential Address, which can be obtained from the clerk). _~--'-- _
28 Franklin Terrace, South Portland, ME 04106
If different, mailing address: -------:---'-:--c~-:__--------~-------------
2. Defendant information: Full name: ..!;lq::1.o~r
.!.!M~a~I~eC!..!n~k~o~ ----,- _
Gender: 0 Female BMale Date of birth: ~0~5!....:/3:::.:0~/..!...1
~97!...:3~ _
Race: ~ White 0 Black 0 Asian or Pacific Islander 0 American Indian or Alaskan Native 0 Unknown
Present street address, city and telephone number: --.:u=,-,n!..!!.!.kn~o..!.'w~n!...-. --, _
If different, mailing address:.--:--: ~-::-:-:=-_--=-_--,c-----:-_-:-:--:--:--:--
__ -:----=---=-
__ ---:-'":-- ~-:-:- _
3. Plaintiff's former residence (if different from above), which plaintiff has left to avoid abuse: (street address, city,
state): -=,-__ --;:::::::;- ---;::::;:;- _
4. Plaintiff's relationship to the defendant is: [lspouse; 0 former spouse; 0 father/mother of my child(ren);
o relative; 0 former or present sexual partner; 0 presently living together. 0 dating partner; 0 victim of defendant's sexual
assault; 0 victim of defendant's stalking. If none of the above, describe relationship:
5. Plaintiff and defendant are the parents of the following child(ren).
Name Date of Birth Gender Present Address
Mila Malenko 11/29/06 _F_ 28 Franklin Terrace, S. Portland
List below where and with whom the child(ren) have lived within the past 5 years.
Name and present address of Dates child(ren) lived Town and State where child(ren)
person child(ren) lived with with that person lived with that person
Plaintiff Late May 08 - present ..:;:;:i..:...
• ..:...t-'...:;.O..:...n::.:..;la:::..:n..:...a:::2,~IV.:..:I.:::t:'--
_
Plaintiff & Defendant Sept 05 - late May 08 S. Portland, ME (2 mo in Budapest)
Plaintiff & Defendant June 05 - Seot 05 ..:...P-=oc..:..rt..:..:..la=nc..:..d=,~M...:...=:E'__ _
6. The person who has primary physical residence of the above-named child(ren) is _P'--'-"'a
.•.•
;1..Io.llt;ffll...- _
7. Plaintiff has not been involved in any way in, and has no information about, another court case in any state
concerning the custody of the child(ren) except as follows: III Divorce or Family Matter Action
o Protective Custody 0 Other (describe what kind of other case) :---:-- -:---'- _
8. No one other than the parties has physical custody of the child(ren), or claims to have custody or visitation rights
with respect to the child(ren), except as follows: ~ _
9. Check all of thefollowing that apply:
o
I am in immediate and present danger of abuse by the defendant, and I ask that the court issue a
temporary order to protect me without prior notice to the defendant.
Q] My child(ren) are in immediate and present danger of abuse by the defendant, and I ask that the court issue
a temporary order to protect my minor child(ren) without prior notice to the defendant.
o
I am not asking for a temporary order.
PA-OOI, Rev. 08/07
6. 10. Answer the following questions:
Does defendant have access to a firearm? 0 Yes 0 No Does defendant possess a firearm? 0 Yes IIINo
Has the defendant ever used a firearm in an intimidating, threatening or abusive way? 0 Yes III No
If yes, please explain: ~ ~ ~ -'--_
11. I base my claim for protection from abuse on the following facts: Describe the abuse. State who committed the
abuse. when it occurred and who was abused. (If additional snace is needed attach another sheet.)
12. One or both of the parties ate involved in the following related cases:
III Divorce or Family Matter action 0 Protection from Abuse 0 Criminal Complaint
If there are any court orders awarding custody, visitation, etc. for the children or any court orders against the defendant
or any actions pending against either the plaintiff or the defendant, give details: _
13. 0 Public assistance
benefits have been or are now being received for the child(ren)
o The Department of Human Services has been contacted to set up, review, change or enforce a child support
order regarding the child(ren). (If an order has issued, a copy of the order must be attached to this complaint). If either
of the above statements is checked, you must send a copy of this complaint to the Department of Human Services, Support
Enforcement Division, Central Office Supervisor, State House Station 11, Augusta, ME 04333-0011.
14. 0 To the personal knowledge of the undersigned, Defendant is not in the Military Service of the United States, as
defined in Article I of the "Soldiers' and Sailors' Civil Relief Act of 1940" as amended. This fact is evidenced by the
following facts as to residence, employment, etc.: _
THEREFORE, I ASK THE COURT TO:
!!1 (a) Order the defendant to stop abusing me and my minor child(ren) living in the household.
o (b) Order the defendant to have no contact with me, directly or indirectly E:J or my minor children.
1!1 (c) Order the defendant not to enter my separate residence.
[!] (d) Order the defendant to refrain from repeatedly, and without reasonable cause, following me or being at, or
in the vicinity of, my home, school, business or place of employment.
El (e) Order the defendant not to possess or use a firearm or dangerous weapon.
o (f) Give me possession of and order the defendant to leave immediately and not again enter my residence
located at: 28 Franklin Terrace, S. Portland, ME
o (g) Give me possession of the following personal and household property:
o (h) Award me custody of the following child(ren) (names and ages): Mila Malenko, 1 year old.
III (i) Give the defendant the following visitation rights with the child(ren): Supervised visitation with an appropriate
professional supervisor pending the GAL's investigation and recommendations in the family matter and thereafter
such contact as may be agreed upon or ordered in the family matter.
!ZI (j) Order the defendant to receive counseling, to pay support for me and/or our child(ren), pay damages for lost
0. (k) Other relief requested: Return of daughter's passport to Plaintiff. V
wages or injuries, pay court costs and attorney fees, and enter any ot~ecessary orders.
Date: 6/6/08 . . -="7~i:.".;~~;·-·---;>,,£/~-____:=--=~::::::====--
~laintiff
Personally appeared the above named Plaintiff and oath to the truth of the statements in the above
complaint, before me,
Date: 6/6/08
_Cl~n
7. I am seeking an order for protection from abuse against my husband, Igor Malenko, on
behalf of our daughter, Mila, because I am very afraid for her safety based his history of
physically abusing me with Mila in my arms and without regard to her safety, throwing
things at me that could easily have hit her instead, again without regard to her safety,
delusions he has suffered at times that cause me to be concerned about his ability to
safely care for her when he is one of those states, and his even mistaking her for the dog
on one occasion while in a state.
My fear and request for protection are based in part on the following history:
Igor has a long history of violence, not just against me but against others. At the age of
16, he knocked a classmate into a coma and was ordered to obtain psychological
treatment. After that, Igor suffered incredible atrocities that are not his fault, but that
have left him even more dangerous. He was a member of the JNA, the Yugoslav
National Army, and was severely tortured in the Balkan war, which was known for its
~"L.~ ••• ~L.~L~l~LJ' .'~~ ~.~~~lL, 1.~ ••~~ r' 11(")I(")01(,.l'Il
nl«('.nl'l-rl)"A
l'Inn «DAnTTlrnAln l'I
psychiatric hospital, and has been diagnosed subsequently with PTSD by True North. I
also believe he suffers from bipolar disorder, although I am not certain whether there has
ever been a formal diagnosis. There has not been one here, but might have been one in
Yugoslavia.
When Igor has been in manic states, he has, among other things, thrown things at me,
even when I have been holding the baby and nursing the baby, slapped me very hard, also
while I was nursing our baby, and thrown a jar at my head. While we were living in
Budapest last year, he also repeatedly threatened to kill me, forcing me to flee the country
where I had a tenure track academic position. At other times, when Igor is not in a manic
state, he can seem quite fine, and I have repeatedly taken him back based on promises he
would seek appropriate help or treatment, was sorry, would not behave that way again,
and also based on my feeling that my daughter needs her father in her life but that her
safety could only be assured by my being there as well.
Igor is once again in a manic state, and I am very fearful what he might do. Just two
weeks ago, he forced open my bedroom door (which I had blocked) while my daughter
and I were asleep, terrifying me, demanding to kiss our sleeping daughter, and making
threats if I do anything to "take his daughrer" fmrn him l-iA t1;t1 n(")t«nA('.;fvmbt hA
would do, but based on the past specific threats to kill me and past violence during manic
attacks, I am extremely concerned by these threats. Also, while the threats were phrased
in a conditional way of "if I" did something, he has a history of misperceiving situations
and could take almost anything as an effort to ''take his daughter," including this
Complaint, especially now that I am seeking protection on our daughter's behalf, which I
was trying to avoid on the advice of counsel in order to avoid triggering him if I could
otherwise provide for her safety.
Without a protection from abuse order, I do not believe that my daughter will be safe or
that anything will keep him from grabbing Our daughter since he has made it clear that he
intends to do exactly that if there is only an order with respect to me that does not
8. expressly apply to our daughter. Even with a protection from abuse order, I will be very
nervous for Mila's safety because Igor's actions tend not to be premeditated but instead
impulsive. But the order should ensure an ability for supervised contact that will permit
her to be safe while ensuring they are still able to have contact and maintain a
relationship.