The evaluation assessed the performance of Ethiopia's Health Sector Pooled Fund Phase II (HPF-II) from July 2007 to June 2010. Key findings include that HPF-II effectively and efficiently supported priority health programs. However, the evaluation identified areas for improvement including enhancing technical assistance and capacity building, strengthening needs assessment and impact evaluation, and ensuring full utilization of funds by regional health bureaus. Overall the evaluation found that HPF-II is an effective mechanism for channeling funds to critical health programs in Ethiopia in a responsive and demand-driven manner.

1.
Asraade Aba
Aug
ate (MD, M
gust, 201
MSc)
10

2. F M O H
ACRO
ADC
ARM
BPR
BSC
DAC
DCI
DFID
DPs
EFY
FMO
HPF
HPN
HSD
IA
IC
JCCC
JRM
M&E
MDG
MDG
MOU
PAS
PFM
PPFG
RHB
RNE
TA
TOR
UNIC
WBP
WHO
H , E t h i o
ONYMS
C ……
M ……
R ……
……
CA ……
……
D ……
……
……
OH ……
……
N ……
DP ……
……
……
C ……
M ……
E ……
G ……
G PF ……
U ……
DEP ……
M ……
GD ……
B ……
E ……
……
R ……
CEF ……
P ……
O ……
p i a – E v
S
………. Aus
………. Ann
………. Bus
………. Bal
………. Dru
………. Dev
………. De
………. Dev
………. Eth
………. Fed
………. Hea
………. Hea
………. Hea
………. Iris
………. Ita
………. Joi
………. Joi
………. Mo
………. Mil
………. Mil
………. Me
………. Pla
………. Poo
………. Pol
………. Reg
………. Roy
………. Tec
………. Ter
………. Un
………. Wo
………. Wo
a l u a t i o n
strian Devel
nual Review
siness Proce
lanced Score
ug Administ
velopment C
partment Fo
velopment P
hiopian Fisca
deral Minist
alth Pooled
alth, Popula
alth Sector
sh Aid
alian Cooper
nt Core Coo
nt Review M
onitoring and
llennium De
llennium De
emorandum
an for Accele
oled Fund m
licy, Plan an
gional Healt
yal Netherla
chnical Assis
rms of Refer
ited Nations
oreda Based
oreda Health
n o f H e a
lopment Coo
w Meeting
ess Re-engin
e card
tration and C
Cooperation
or Internatio
Partners
al Year
ry of Health
Fund
ation and Nu
Developmen
ration
ordinating C
Meeting
d Evaluation
evelopment
evelopment
of Understa
erated and S
manager
nd Finance G
th Bureau
ands Embas
stance
rence
s Children’s
d Planning
h Office
l t h P o o l
I
operation
neering
Control Age
n of Ireland
onal Develo
h
utrition
nt Plan
ommittee
n
Goals
Goals Poole
anding
Sustained D
General Dire
sy
Education F
e d F u n d
Index consu
ncy
opment
ed Fund
Development
ectorate
Fund
sult, August,
t to End Pov
| 1
2010
verty

3. F M O H
Table
1. IN
1
1
1
1
1
1
2. O
3. SC
3
3
4. IM
4
4
4
4
5. R
6. A
6
6
H , E t h i o
e of Con
NTRODUCTIO
.1. Establish
.2. Objective
.3. Developm
.4. Implemen
.5. The Pool
.6. Reporting
OBJECTIVES O
COPE OF THE
.1. Pre-evalu
.2. Output o
MPLEMENTA
.1. Financial
4.1.1.
4.1.2.
.2. Major Ac
4.2.1.
4.2.2.
4.2.3.
4.2.4.
.3. Performa
.4. Performa
4.4.1.
4.4.2.
4.4.3.
4.4.4.
4.4.5.
REFERENCES
ANNEX
.1. List of Pa
.2. Question
p i a – E v
ntents
ON
hment of the H
es of the Hea
ment Partner
ntation and M
l Fund Mana
g
OF THE EVAL
E EVALUATIO
uation steps
f the Evaluat
ATION RESUL
l highlights
Inflow of f
Expenditur
chievements
Technical A
Reviews, T
Studies and
Woreda ba
ance, Effectiv
ance of Partn
Conclusion
Enhancing
Sustainabil
Technical A
Availabilit
articipants
nnaire
a l u a t i o n
Health Secto
alth Pooled F
rs Contributin
Monitoring o
ager
LUATION
ON AND MET
tion
LTS
funds
res
of the Projec
Assistance
Trainings and
d Researches
ased Plannin
veness and E
ners
n and Recom
g monitoring
lity of the He
Assistance a
ty of Operatio
n o f H e a
or Pooled Fun
Fund
ng to HPF-II
of Health Sec
THODOLOGY
ct
d Exposures
s
g
fficiency of t
mmendations
and evaluati
ealth Pooled
and Needs an
on Procedure
l t h P o o l
I
nd
I
ctor Pooled F
Y
the Project
s
ion measures
Fund
nd Impact As
es and Manu
e d F u n d
Index consu
Fund
s
ssessment
uals
sult, August,
| 2
2010

4. F M O H
Execu
The
to e
syste
plan
Harm
harm
proc
proc
The
HSD
less
HSD
mon
HSD
issue
of n
parti
and
The
purp
repo
utiliz
reco
I wa
mad
ente
2007
conf
activ
The
FMO
stud
H , E t h i o
utive su
Federal De
nsuring the
em through
, the FMOH
monization a
monization a
cess, the He
cess of HSDP
overall obje
DP by suppo
cumbersom
DP-III. The H
itoring and
DP mid-term
es; training
national and
icipated in H
UNICEF. DP
objective of
pose or not
orts a true a
zation of H
ommendation
s engaged t
e available
ered by Deve
7 to June 20
formed to th
vities as a wh
main activit
OH Reviews
ies and also
p i a – E v
ummary
mocratic Re
accessibilit
the impleme
H and the HP
and Alignme
and alignme
ealth Pooled
P and achiev
ective of the
orting its im
me funding m
HPF-II spec
evaluation
m evaluation;
and visits bo
d internatio
HPF-II betwe
Ps contributi
f the evalua
by providin
and fair view
HPF-II in a
ns.
to perform t
in HPF-II fo
elopment Pa
010. The ev
he guideline
hole.
ties accomp
s, continued
o the full sup
a l u a t i o n
y
epublic of Et
y of effectiv
entation of th
PN Develop
ent Action P
ent for aid
d Fund (HPF
vement of th
HPF-II is to
mplementatio
mechanisms
cifically cove
through sup
; policy dialo
oth within an
onal consult
een July 20
ions to HPF-
tion is to as
ng evidence
w of the perf
accordance
the evaluatio
or the progr
artners and
valuation wa
as provided
plished in HP
support fo
port to carry
n o f H e a
thiopia, Mini
ve health se
he Health S
ment Partne
Plan that su
effectivenes
F) is establis
he MDGs in
o contribute
on process t
s, in line wit
ered expens
pervision an
ogue works
nd outside t
tants. A to
07 and June
-II amounted
ssess wheth
e for the DP
formance, e
with its o
on of the ac
ram of work
FMOH. The
as executed
d in the MO
PF-II include
r Trainings
y out the Wo
l t h P o o l
I
stry of Healt
ervices at e
ector Develo
ers have dev
upports the
ss. As par
shed to sup
Ethiopia.
to the fulfillm
through flex
h the Harmo
ses related
d meetings
hops; studie
he country,
otal of six
e 2010: DC
d to a total o
er the fund
Ps and the
effectiveness
objectives,
ctivities, perf
by all sour
e evaluation
d in accorda
OU and cove
es the provi
and Expos
reda Based
e d F u n d
Index consu
th (FMOH) i
very level o
opment Plan
veloped a H
country’s ac
rt of this ha
pport the imp
ment of the
xible, time-s
onization Ac
to technical
such as A
es on key h
and also for
Developme
I, RNE, DFI
f $ 4,692,91
has served
FMOH. The
s, efficiency
thereby dr
formance an
ces based o
covered the
nce with sta
ered the Po
ision of TAs
ures, asses
Planning.
sult, August,
is committed
of the health
n. Within this
Health Secto
ction plan o
armonization
plementation
goals of the
ensitive and
ction Plan o
assistance
RMs, JRMs
health secto
r recruitmen
ent Partners
ID, IC, ADC
3.77 million
its intended
e evaluation
and eligible
raw lessons
nd resources
on the MOU
e period July
andards and
ooled Fund’s
s, successfu
ssments and
| 3
2010
d
h
s
r
of
n
n
e
d
of
e,
s;
r
t
s
C,
.
d
n
e
s
s
U
y
d
s
ul
d

5. F M O H
In g
resp
need
proc
from
there
The
new
conf
Hea
need
parti
man
imple
How
•
•
•
•
H , E t h i o
eneral, the
ponsive and
ds of HSDP
cess. The es
m the HPF. T
eby reach th
overall findi
donors in t
ference, and
lth Pooled F
ds of the H
icipatory. UN
aging the
ementation
wever, there a
The utilizati
The reques
Monitoring
Ensuring TA
requires tho
p i a – E v
evaluation
demand-dr
P by strength
stablishment
These are im
he poor in Et
ings in HPF
the Pooled
d increased
Fund has sig
HSDP more
NICEF, as
fund and
process.
are significa
ion of the fun
sts made by
activities ne
A effectivene
orough Need
a l u a t i o n
revealed th
iven fund c
hening the
of the MDG
mportant ste
hiopia.
-II demonstr
Fund, involv
level of fun
gnificant be
e efficiently.
a Pooled F
also to f
ant concerns
nd as a who
RHBs to util
ed to be enh
ess and skil
ds and Impa
n o f H e a
hat HPF-II is
hanneled to
planning an
G Performanc
pping stone
rated advan
vement of D
nding. The e
nefits in allo
. The involv
und Manag
fill importan
s that need to
ole was very
lize HPF-II h
hanced to en
l transfer for
ct Assessme
l t h P o o l
I
s widely se
owards the m
nd coordinat
ce Funds ha
es in realizin
cements in
DPs in study
evaluation te
owing fundin
vement of
er, provided
nt funding
o be address
low;
has been ins
nsure eligible
r capacity bu
ent;
e d F u n d
Index consu
een as effec
most urgent
tion and imp
as drawn a lo
g the Paris
terms of pa
y tours and
eam conclud
ng to respon
donors has
d substantia
gaps thro
sed and incl
significant;
e fund utiliza
uilding and s
sult, August,
ctive, timely
t and critica
plementation
ot of lessons
Agenda and
rticipation o
internationa
ded that the
nd to priority
s been very
al support in
oughout the
ude:
ation;
sustainability
| 4
2010
y,
al
n
s
d
of
al
e
y
y
n
e
y

6. F M O H
Introd
1. Estab
The
ensu
throu
HSDP
be im
Partn
suppo
part o
the im
Since
fundi
mech
Monit
such
key h
and
imple
The f
Marc
Nethe
UNIC
first H
purpo
accou
suppo
H , E t h i o
duction
blishment of
Federal Dem
ring the acc
ugh the imple
P III is near
mplemented
ners have d
orts the cou
of this harm
mplementatio
e its inceptio
ng aimed
hanisms. Th
toring and E
as ARMs, J
health secto
also for
ementation o
first phase o
h 2007 by a
erlands Em
CEF, which a
HPF, condu
ose intended
unt the reco
ort the exten
p i a – E v
f the Health
mocratic Re
cessibility of
ementation
its complet
from 2010-
eveloped a
untry’s action
onization pr
on process o
on on July 20
at support
he HPF sp
Evaluation th
JRMs, HSDP
r issues; Tra
recruitment
of HSDP and
of the HPF
joint fundin
bassy (RNE
also carried
cted in Mar
d. Based on
ommendation
nsion of the
a l u a t i o n
Sector Poo
epublic of Et
f effective h
of the Healt
ion and the
-2015. Withi
Health Sec
n plan of har
rocess, the H
of HSDP and
005, the Hea
ting implem
ecifically co
hrough Sup
P Mid-Term
aining and E
of nationa
d also build t
was implem
g from the D
E), the Dep
out the fun
rch/April 200
n the positiv
ns of the eva
Fund into a
n o f H e a
oled Fund
thiopia, Min
health servic
th Sector De
preparation
n this plan,
ctor Harmon
rmonization
Health Poole
d achieveme
alth Pooled F
mentation o
overs expen
ervision and
Evaluation;
Exposure vis
al and int
the capacity
mented betw
Development
artment for
nd administr
07, conclude
ve experienc
aluation, a n
new phase f
l t h P o o l
I
istry of Hea
ces at every
evelopment
s are under
the FMOH
nization and
and alignme
ed Fund (HP
ent of the he
Fund has be
of HSDP t
nses related
d financial s
; Policy dialo
sits both wit
ternational
of the FMO
ween 1st of N
t Cooperatio
Internationa
ation. An in
ed that the
ces with the
number of H
for 3 years, t
e d F u n d
Index consu
alth (FMOH)
y level of th
Plan. The im
rway for HSD
and the HP
Alignment
ent for aid e
PF) is estab
ealth MDGs
ecome an im
through su
d to Techn
support for F
ogue worksh
thin and out
consultants
H.
November 2
on of Ireland
al Developm
dependent e
fund had be
e initial HPF
HPN Partners
the HPF-II.
sult, August,
is committe
he health sy
mplementati
DP IV, whic
PN Develop
Action Plan
effectiveness
blished to su
in Ethiopia.
portant sour
ustained fun
nical Assista
FMOH’s Rev
hops; Studie
side the cou
to assist
2005 and 31
(DCI), the R
ment (DFID)
evaluation o
een used fo
F and taking
s have agre
| 5
2010
ed to
ystem
on of
h will
pment
n that
s. As
pport
rce of
nding
ance,
views
es on
untry,
t the
1st of
Royal
) and
of the
or the
g into
eed to

7. F M O H
2. Objec
The g
by s
cumb
The s
a
b
c)
d
e
f)
g
h
i)
j)
H , E t h i o
ctives of the
general obje
supporting
bersome fun
specific obje
) Support t
HSDP Mi
to facilita
reporting
indicators
) Help to
seminars
) Provide r
(operation
) Enable h
internatio
useful ga
implemen
) Provide r
assist the
Strengthe
activities
) Build cap
and Align
) Sponsorin
developm
Cover the
Provide
implemen
p i a – E v
e Health Poo
ective of the
its impleme
ding mecha
ectives of the
the monitori
d-Term Rev
te the secto
process as
s and targets
cover the c
on importan
resources fo
nal research
health policy
nal confere
ains of exp
ntation.
resources fo
e Ministry on
ening the ca
in the health
acity at all le
ment.
ng meetings
ment of stand
e manageme
resources
ntation of HS
a l u a t i o n
oled Fund
HPF-II is to
entation pro
nisms, in lin
e HPF-II incl
ng and eva
views and F
or’s inputs t
s well as t
s in the PAS
cost of wor
nt health issu
or commissio
h) in Ethiopia
y makers a
nces, semin
periences a
or the recru
policy relate
apacity of th
h sector.
evels of the
s of the MOH
dards, guide
ent fee charg
for other
SDP priorities
n o f H e a
contribute to
ocess throu
e with the H
ude:
luation prog
inal Evaluat
towards the
he tracking
DEP policy
rkshops for
ues in Ethiop
oning releva
a.
and key imp
nars, short
and exposu
itment of in
ed research,
he HSDP se
health syste
H and the pr
lines and ma
ged by UNIC
relevant p
s.
l t h P o o l
I
o the fulfillm
ugh flexible
armonizatio
grams of HS
tions) to imp
overall PA
of progres
matrix.
policy dial
pia.
ant studies
plementers
study trips
re in healt
nternational
, assessmen
ecretariat an
em in plannin
rivate health
anuals on Pu
CEF.
process act
e d F u n d
Index consu
ent of the go
e, time-sen
on Action Pla
SDP (such a
prove its imp
ASDEP/MDG
ss in terms
ogue and f
on key hea
to participa
or visits th
th policy de
and nationa
nts and innov
nd FMOH in
ng, M&E, an
h sector and
ublic Private
tivities in
sult, August,
oals of the H
nsitive and
an of HSDP-
as ARMs, J
plementation
G monitoring
of the rele
formulation,
lth sector is
ate in local
hat contribu
evelopment
al consultan
vations.
co-ordinatio
nd Harmoniz
providing T
e Partnership
support of
| 6
2010
HSDP
less
III.
RMs,
n and
g and
evant
and
ssues
and
ute to
and
nts to
on of
zation
TA on
ps.
f the

8. F M O H
3. Deve
The D
a
b
c)
d
e
f)
In ac
initiat
discu
of pe
4. Imple
The
follow
Coord
and
Finan
Annu
efficie
Expe
Base
its b
reque
its pu
Annu
Upon
docu
Minis
H , E t h i o
elopment Pa
DPs who sig
) Departme
) Developm
) Royal Net
) Italian Co
) Austrian D
United Na
ccordance w
ted by FMO
ussed and ag
rformance, r
ementation a
developmen
wing the pro
dinating Co
Nutrition (H
nce General
ual HPF-II A
ent utilizatio
enditure Plan
ed on the joi
udget, the
ests for fund
urpose. JCC
ual Plan or fo
n approval f
mentation w
stry of Health
p i a – E v
rtners (DPs)
gned up the M
ent for Intern
ment Cooper
therlands Em
ooperation (IC
Developmen
ations Childr
with the MO
H for the pu
greed by the
reporting an
and Monitor
nt of annua
oper implem
mmittee (JC
PN) partne
l Directorate
Activity and
on. PPFGD/F
ns and finaliz
ntly approve
PPFGD-FM
ding, and ens
CC’s endorse
or activities w
for funding,
will be trans
h.
a l u a t i o n
) Contributin
MoU with FM
national Deve
ration of Irela
mbassy (RN
C),
nt Cooperatio
ren’s Educat
U, allocatio
urpose of im
e JCCC, whi
d audit, as o
ring of Healt
al utilization
mentation of
CCC) of the
rs. The JCC
e of the FM
Expenditure
FMOH is in
zing it with J
ed Annual A
MOH is resp
sures the ap
ement is ne
which excee
written aut
mitted to U
n o f H e a
ng to HPF-II
MOH and co
elopment (D
and (DCI),
NE),
on (ADC);
tion Fund (U
ns from the
mplementing
ich will ensu
outlined in th
th Sector Po
plan, decis
its decision
Federal Mi
CC, chaired
OH, has de
e Plan and
charge of d
CCC.
Activity and E
ponsible for
ppropriate an
eded for ap
ed the agreed
thorization f
NICEF by t
l t h P o o l
I
I
ontributed to
DFID), UK,
UNICEF);
e Pooled Fu
the HSDP.
ure consisten
he MOU.
ooled Fund (
sion on the
n is the res
inistry of He
d by the He
elegated res
controlling
developing t
Expenditure
r receiving,
nd efficient u
pproval of ac
d budget (lin
for payment
the Head of
e d F u n d
Index consu
the HPF-II a
und are bas
The propos
ncy with the
(HPF-II)
utilization
ponsibility o
ealth and He
ead of the P
sponsibility f
the Fund’s
the draft An
Plan and w
processing
use of the Fu
ctivities not
ne) with more
t together w
f the PPFGD
sult, August,
are the follow
ed on prop
sal are initial
aims and re
of the HPF
of the Joint
ealth, Popul
Policy, Plan
or endorsing
appropriate
nual Activity
within the lim
g and appro
und in the sp
being part o
e than 10%.
with the rele
D of the Fe
| 7
2010
wing:
osals
lly be
eview
F and
Core
lation
n and
g the
e and
y and
mits of
oving
pirit of
of the
evant
ederal

9. F M O H
5. The P
In line
has o
mana
charg
UNIC
autho
Fede
contr
venue
will b
6. Repo
UNIC
imple
Plan,
The s
1
2
3
4
5
H , E t h i o
Pool Fund M
e with HPF-
officially req
aging and a
ged a 5 % fe
CEF will effe
orization sign
eral Ministry
racts of hire
es and facil
e executed
orting
CEF should
ementation o
One Budge
specific repo
) Quarterly
undertake
within 4 w
) Overall a
year, to b
) A final na
project, co
) A final ce
operation
) Provision
JCCC and
p i a – E v
Manager (PF
-II proposal a
quested UN
administerin
ee for admini
ect payment
ned by the H
of Health. T
d consultan
ities, transpo
by UNICEF
produce an
of the activiti
et and One R
orts that shou
summary
en by the fu
weeks after t
nnual progr
e submitted
arrative and
overing the e
ertified financ
ally closed.
of additiona
d the Develo
a l u a t i o n
M)
and in cons
ICEF to as
ng the HPF
istration and
ts for activit
Head of the
The procure
nts, payment
ortation for s
in collabora
d submit co
ies and the
Report, so av
uld be subm
financial st
und recipien
he end of th
ress (narrati
within 6 we
financial re
entire period
cial stateme
al informatio
opment Part
n o f H e a
ultation with
ssist the imp
F. The Deve
d operationa
ties financed
Policy, Plan
ement of go
ts for such
such occasi
tion with the
onsolidated
execution of
voiding acco
mitted by the
tatements a
nts during th
e reporting p
ve and fina
eks after the
port no late
d of the proje
ent no later t
n pertaining
ners.
l t h P o o l
I
h DPs and th
plementation
elopment P
l cost by UN
d by the HP
n and Financ
oods and se
services as
ons as JRM
e PPFGD-FM
Progress an
f the Fund, d
ounting to ind
PFM include
and a brief
he quarter i
period.
ancial) repor
e end of the
er than 6 mo
ect,
than one yea
to the HPF-
e d F u n d
Index consu
he Federal M
n of the HP
Partners con
NICEF.
PF-II upon r
ce General D
ervices, adm
s in the rent
Ms and printi
MOH.
nd Financia
drawn up in
dividual don
e:
summary
n question,
rts for every
reporting pe
onths after c
ar after the
-II as may b
sult, August,
Ministry of H
PF-II by hol
ntribution wi
receipt of o
Directorate o
ministration o
tal of confer
ng of docum
l Reports on
the spirit of
ors.
of the acti
to be subm
y Ethiopian
eriod.
completion o
project has
e required b
| 8
2010
Health
lding,
ill be
fficial
of the
of the
rence
ments
n the
f One
vities
mitted
fiscal
of the
been
by the

10. F M O H
Objec
The obje
purpose
draw less
Specific o
a) T
im
b) T
u
c) T
th
d) T
F
e) T
co
f) T
a
g) T
th
h) T
fle
i) T
sh
H , E t h i o
ctive of
ective of the
or not by pro
sons and rec
objectives o
To assess a
mplementatio
To assess th
tilization of t
To identify wh
he objectives
To appraise
MOH and ot
To identify in
ommitment o
To assess th
bout HPF an
To assess th
he fund and
To assess th
exibility, spe
To gather fee
hould functio
p i a – E v
the Eva
evaluation i
oviding evide
commendati
f the evaluat
ctivities and
on of HPF-II
he performa
the Fund (inc
hether the fu
s of HPF-II;
the general
ther non-HP
nterests, ch
of only few D
e level of aw
nd scrutinize
e extent of
activity mon
he performa
eed and tran
edbacks, opi
on better or
a l u a t i o n
aluation
is generally
ence for DP
ions.
tion are:
d achieveme
based on th
ances within
cluding all re
und has bee
understand
PF donors on
allenges an
DPs through
wareness, fa
e their challe
the coordina
nitoring by JC
nce of fund
sparency att
inions and s
be enhance
n o f H e a
to assess w
s and the FM
ents carried
he MOU ente
n the scope
esources ma
en utilized fo
ding, percep
n the design,
nd/or other
hout the impl
amiliarity and
enges in utiliz
ation, plann
CCC, as per
administrat
tained;
suggestions
d for a susta
l t h P o o l
I
whether the f
MOH on utili
d out within
ered by DPs
e of HPF-II
ade available
r its intended
ptions, exper
, objectives a
relevant fac
lementation
d experienc
zing the HPF
ing, decision
r the mandat
tion by UNIC
from all stak
ainable impa
e d F u n d
Index consu
fund has se
ization of the
the specifie
s and FMOH
and meas
e through HP
d purpose a
rience and o
and perform
ctors that co
of Health Po
e of potentia
F;
n making in
te provided;
CEF and ga
keholders as
act;
sult, August,
erved its inte
e fund, there
ed period o
H;
sure the lev
PF-II);
s per the sp
opinions of
mance of HPF
ontributed to
ool Fund;
al fund recip
the utilizati
auge the lev
s to how the
| 9
2010
ended
eby to
of the
vel of
pirit of
DPs,
F-II;
o the
pients
on of
vel of
HPF

11. F M O H
Scope
I was en
available
Developm
The eval
accordan
evaluatio
1. Pre-e
As pa
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1
For this
compreh
Donors,
Technica
FMOH a
prepared
relevance
question
principal
via e-ma
In additio
related d
question
evaluatio
Achievem
, E t h i o p
e of the
ngaged to p
e in HPF-II
ment Partne
luation cove
nce with sta
on covered th
evaluation st
art of our pre
) Terms of
) The Mem
) The Natio
) Health Se
) Minutes o
) Financial
) Annual R
) Proposals
) Payments
0) Supports
relevant H
s evaluation
ensive data
PFM team,
al Assistance
and others a
d to reflect
e, efficiency
naires are a
evaluator e
il and/or thro
on to the qu
documents o
naires, disc
on paramete
ments, perfo
i a – E v a
e Evalua
perform ass
for the prog
ers and FMO
ered the per
andards and
he Pooled F
teps
e-evaluation
reference (T
morandum of
onal Health S
ector Pooled
of JCCC mee
Statements
eports on th
s of recipien
s Policy Guid
for non-op
HPF-II docum
n, question
a from FMO
, previous c
e for FMOH
and the com
the standa
y, sustainab
annexed with
either throug
ough telepho
uestionnaires
of fund utiliz
cussions an
ers and in ac
ormances, e
l u a t i o n
ation an
essment of
gram of wo
OH.
riod July 20
d conformed
Fund’s activit
activities an
TOR) of the
Understand
Sector Deve
d Fund I, Fina
etings;
and reports
e Health Po
ts submitted
delines and
perational re
mentations.
nnaires wer
H, DPs, JC
contractors
H. The quest
mments obta
rd evaluatio
bility, owner
h this report
h individual
one.
s, documen
zation were
nd documen
ccordance w
effectiveness
o f H e a l
nd Metho
the activitie
ork by all so
007 to June
d to the gu
ties as a who
nd steps, the
Health Poole
ding (MOU) b
elopment Pla
al Evaluation
s of HPF-II p
oled Fund II
d to JCCC; a
Procuremen
esearches a
re develope
CC membe
hired by th
tionnaires w
ained were
on informati
rship, impac
. All of the q
in-depth int
ts related to
reviewed.
nt reviews
with the obje
s, efficiency
t h P o o l e
I
odology
es, perform
ources base
2010. The
uideline as
ole and the e
e following d
ed Fund Fin
between the
an (HSDP-III
n Report; Ap
roduced by
I activities, th
and
nt Rules and
as in HMIS,
ed with a
ers and othe
e PFM and
were discuss
incorporate
on and con
ct and othe
questionnair
terviews, co
o the author
The results
were analy
ective and ta
y, fund adm
e d F u n d
Index consu
y
ances and
ed on the M
evaluation
provided in
entire opera
ocuments w
al Evaluatio
e DPs and th
, preparation
pril2007;
UNICEF Eth
hrough to Ju
d Procedures
HSDP IV
purpose
er relevant s
d also cons
sed with tec
ed. The que
nstitute gen
er important
es were adm
nversation,
rization, exe
were collec
yzed using
argets speci
inistration (f
sult, August,
resources m
MOU entere
was execut
n the MOU.
tions.
were reviewe
n;
e FMOH;
n of HSDP IV
hiopia;
une 2010;
s;
preparation
of collectin
stakeholders
ultants prov
hnical expe
stionnaires
eral, cohere
t questions.
ministered b
and discuss
ecution and
cted through
the approp
fied in the M
flexibility, sp
| 10
2010
made
ed by
ed in
The
ed:
V);
n and
ng a
s and
viding
rts of
were
ence,
The
by the
sions,
other
h the
priate
MOU.
peed,

12. F M O H
transpare
reporting
2. Outp
In acc
evalu
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
, E t h i o p
ency, accou
g were amon
ut of the Eva
cordance wit
ation are pre
. A section
as found f
. A section
major acti
. A section
Pooled Fu
. A section
publication
. A section
Fund with
. A section
existing lim
. This repor
responden
i a – E v a
untability, cu
ng the major
aluation
th the terms
esented below
of the evalua
from the fina
of the evalu
ivities comple
reporting o
nd, commen
commenting
ns specifying
on specific c
pertinent s
on other re
mitations rec
rt also includ
nts in the inte
l u a t i o n
umbersomen
parameters
of reference
w:
ation reportin
ancial report
uation report
eted.
on the perfo
ting on the d
g on the He
g areas of pos
challenges a
uggestions fo
elevant and
cognized.
des tables, fig
erviews.
o f H e a l
ness), level
taken up in
(TOR) for th
ng on the fin
reviews.
ting on the
ormances, ef
degree of com
ealth Pool Fu
ssible improv
and areas of
or their impro
practical rec
gures, questi
t h P o o l e
I
of advocacy
the process
he assignmen
nancial status
Health Poole
ffectiveness
mpliance with
und docume
vement.
weakness id
ovement;
ommendatio
ionnaires, ev
e d F u n d
Index consu
y, planning,
s.
nt, outputs o
s of the Heal
ed Fund II d
and efficien
h the objecti
ntation, reco
dentified in t
ons to assist
valuation too
sult, August,
monitoring
f the indepen
lth Pooled Fu
disbursement
ncy of the H
ve.
ords and rel
the Health P
in correctin
ls used and
| 11
2010
, and
ndent
und II
t and
Health
evant
ooled
g the
list of

13. F M O H
1. Finan
2.1. I
A
2
w
a
$
D
D
D
R
I
A
U
U
A
T
A
C
Ta
G
2.2. E
B
a
a
by
, E t h i o p
ncial highligh
nflow of funds
A total of six
010: DCI, R
was initially s
s the TOR
3,769,368.0
Developmen
Department
Developmen
Royal Nethe
Italian Coope
Austrian Dev
United Natio
Utilization in
Administrati
Total Contrib
Amount not
Contribution
able 1; DPs c
raph 1: %age
Expenditures
Based on the
nd paid to t
ctivities targ
y the recipie
i a – E v a
hts
s
Developme
NE, DFID, I
signed by al
required. Th
08 million.
nt Partners
for Internatio
nt Cooperatio
rlands Emba
eration (IC)
velopment C
ons Children’
n HPF I
on Cost
bution for HP
Utilized
n not utilized
contribution to
e of total con
e agreemen
the recipient
geted at FM
ents and app
l u a t i o n
nt Partners
C, ADC, and
l the DPs; h
he final con
onal Develop
on of Ireland
assy (RNE)
Cooperation (
’s Education
PF II
( by June, 2
o the HPF-II.
tributions in H
nts signed m
ts. These ar
OH’s strateg
proved by the
o f H e a l
participated
d UNICEF, w
however, DP
ntributions of
pment (DFID
(DCI)
(ADC)
n Fund (UNIC
2010)
HPF-II, by 20
money was r
re payments
gic priorities
e Joint Core
t h P o o l e
I
in HPF-II b
which also a
Ps did not co
f DPs to HP
Con
)
CEF)
010.
released int
s to recipien
s for which p
e Coordinatin
e d F u n d
Index consu
between July
administered
ommit and d
PF-II amoun
ntribution in
$504
$1,201
$1,165
$753
$528
$539
$
$3,769
$1,241
o the disbu
nts for the im
proposals ha
ng Committe
sult, August,
y 2007 and J
d the fund. H
disburse as
nted to a tot
USD
4,624.34
1,121.50
5,962.00
3,010.00
8,267.50
9,928.43
$688,900
5%
9,368.08
1,152.93
32.9%
rsement acc
mplementati
ad been init
ee (JCCC).
| 12
2010
June,
HPF-II
early
tal of
count
on of
tiated

14. F M O H
3. Majo
The b
goals
five y
activi
previo
of HS
The e
3.1. T
3
3
3
3.2. R
3
, E t h i o p
r Achieveme
basic initiativ
s of the HSD
years has b
ities in the h
ous HPF ev
SDP and also
evaluation p
Technical Ass
.1.1.One of
capacit
resourc
adoptio
the pro
also pe
.1.2.The FM
contribu
the TAs
based
proposa
support
them w
through
.1.3.The HP
activitie
prepara
standar
and prin
Reviews, Trai
.2.1.The HP
program
indicato
the cos
enabled
contribu
develop
i a – E v a
ents of the H
ve for the es
DP by suppo
been scored
health sector
valuation ver
o an invalua
roduced sig
sistance (TA)
the major a
ty of the FM
ces for the r
on, mobilizat
ovision of po
ersonnel recr
MOH receive
uted to the
s was dema
on the HSD
al submitted
t from HPF.
were approve
h the suppor
PF has also
es carried o
ation events
rds, guidelin
nting and dis
inings and Ex
PF provided
ms of HSDP
ors and targe
st of works
d policy ma
ute to use
pment and im
l u a t i o n
HPF II
stablishment
orting its imp
d by the HP
r. The roles
rified that th
able asset to
nificant findi
activities in t
MOH throug
recruitment o
ion of servic
olicy advice,
ruited to prov
ed considera
achievemen
and-driven a
DP strategic
d to the FM
Of the total
ed by FMOH
rt of HPF-II.
o been an e
out during th
s of HSDP-IV
es and man
stribution of
xposures
d support fo
P as well as
ets in the PA
shops, semi
akers to pa
eful gains
mplementati
o f H e a l
t of the HPF
plementation
PF supportin
of the HPF
e HPF had
the health s
ngs as ident
the impleme
gh the provi
of consultan
ces, skills, kn
capacity bu
vide both ga
able TAs from
nt of sectora
and also car
c plan and
MOH to hire
30 personn
and hired. A
easily access
he impleme
V. The pub
nuals; HSDP
published m
or the impl
s the trackin
ASDEP polic
nars, comm
articipate in
of experien
on.
t h P o o l e
I
was to cont
n process. O
ng the imple
has been e
been a bac
sector in gen
tified below:
entation of H
ision of Tec
nts. Technica
nowledge an
uilding or se
ap filling and
m various pa
al objectives
rried out in c
targets. Th
e Technical
el proposed
A total of 11
sible fund to
entation acti
lishing activ
P’s performan
materials.
ementation,
ng of progre
cy matrix. Th
missioning o
local and
nces and
e d F u n d
Index consu
tribute to the
On the basis
ementation H
enormous an
kbone in the
neral.
HPF-II was t
chnical Assi
al Assistanc
nd technolog
ervice delive
advisory ro
artners throu
s and target
consultation
his was dem
Assistants
to be recru
consultants
o finance va
vities of HS
vity includes
nce reports
monitoring
ess in terms
he HPF supp
of relevant
internationa
exposure i
sult, August,
e fulfillment o
s of this initia
HSDP and
nd reports fr
e implement
to strengthe
istance inclu
ce is the tran
gy. These inc
ery functions
les.
ugh the HPF
ts. The prov
with all par
monstrated
with a fina
ited by HPF
s have been
arious publis
SDP-III and
s developme
and publicat
g and evalu
s of the rele
port also cov
researches,
al seminars
n health p
| 13
2010
of the
ative,
other
rom a
tation
n the
uding
nsfer,
clude
s and
F that
vision
rtners
by a
ancial
, 6 of
hired
shing
also
ent of
tions;
uation
evant
vered
and
that
policy

15. F M O H
3
3.3. S
3
3
3
3.4. W
W
ca
p
by
w
, E t h i o p
.2.2.This ke
a) Su
b) Fin
Gu
c) Su
(BP
d) Fin
e) Fin
trai
Studies and R
.3.1.The HP
importa
related
.3.2.The ev
support
a) Ass
b) Ass
c) Stat
d) Imp
e) Ass
f) Ass
g) Othe
.3.3.The ev
docume
support
of stud
other m
alternat
Woreda based
Woreda Base
arried out b
rovided a cr
y a financia
were develop
i a – E v a
ey activities id
pport for the
nancing the
muz)
pport during
PR) and also
nanced the B
nanced trave
inings.
Researches
PF supporte
ant for the im
FMOH activ
aluation lea
t from HPF-I
essment of
essment of p
tus of Implem
act Evaluatio
ess achieve
ess impleme
er assessme
valuation trie
ented objec
ted via HPF
ies have be
mechanisms
tives are ava
d Planning
ed Planning
by each Wor
rucial suppo
al support fr
ped by each
l u a t i o n
dentified in t
e review mee
Annual Re
g the designi
o staff trainin
Balanced Sc
els, both inte
ed various s
mproved ac
vities in gene
rnt that the
II.
EFY 2001 im
pre-hospital
mentation of
on of the Glo
ements of the
entation of H
ents, survey
ed to exam
ctives of HP
seems min
een execute
s. The bas
ailable.
is an annu
reda, an ad
ort for the W
rom the HPF
Woreda, ve
o f H e a l
this category
etings (JRM
eview Meet
ng process
ng;
ore Card (BS
ernational a
tudies, asse
tivities and
eral.
following ac
mplementatio
service nee
f HMIS;
obal Fund;
e health sect
HSDP III and
s for various
mine efficien
PF. The to
imal but I al
ed using com
ic intention
al, evidence
ministrative
Woreda Base
F-II. During
rified and su
t h P o o l e
I
y include:
and ARM) c
tings of RH
of the Busin
SC) training
nd local, for
essments an
performance
ctivities were
on of HSDP
eds;
tor EFY 200
d identify pre
s initiatives a
ncy of fund
otal number
lso understo
mpetitive fun
was not t
e-based, hea
level equiv
ed Planning
this activity
ubmitted.
e d F u n d
Index consu
conducted by
HBs (e.g. B
ness Process
for DACA s
r meetings,
nd surveys
e of HSDP
e conducted
priority activ
01 implemen
eparation nee
and healthca
utilization
r of operati
ood that a si
nds made a
to congest
alth service
alent to Dis
activities wh
y, 801 Wore
sult, August,
y the FMOH
Benshangul
s Re-engine
staff;
conferences
which were
in particular
d with a fina
vities;
tation
eds of HSDP
are reforms;
in line with
onal resear
gnificant nu
available thr
the HPF w
planning ac
strict. The F
hich was ba
eda Health P
| 14
2010
H;
and
eering
s and
very
r and
ancial
P IV;
h the
rches
mber
rough
when
ctivity
MOH
acked
Plans

16. F M O H
4. Perfo
In ge
and d
stren
first o
of th
impo
Ethio
4.1. T
t
t
f
a
4.2. I
f
y
d
f
s
4.3. T
f
c
w
v
4.4. T
o
t
s
i
4.5. O
u
a
o
n
a
4.6. I
a
p
D
r
, E t h i o p
ormance, Eff
neral, the ev
demand-driv
gthening the
of its kind in
e MDG Per
rtant steppi
opia.
The perform
terms of par
tours and in
fund adminis
activities (as
n HPF-II th
funding (the
years of su
demonstrate
framework fo
sector progra
The HPF m
funding leve
costs and the
will be targe
volume of aid
The standard
of core proje
this, the rap
speed to ma
ncreased qu
On top of th
understood t
are consiste
objectives, a
needs of the
and policies
n this rating
adjustability
process dur
DPs particip
resource allo
i a – E v a
fectiveness a
valuation rev
ven fund cha
e planning a
pooling fun
rformance F
ng stones i
mance of HP
rticipation of
nternational
stration, and
s in the imple
e assistance
first cycle,
ustained do
es an incre
or the priori
ams.
may have be
ls, as well as
e trust they b
eted to prio
d to the prog
d resource a
ects aimed a
pid fund allo
ake timely fu
uality of the o
e achieveme
that it would
ent with the
as formally d
e health sect
for poverty r
g the relevan
to suit cha
ing impleme
ation in each
ocation, deci
l u a t i o n
and Efficienc
vealed that H
anneled towa
and coordina
ds in the Et
Funds has
n realizing
PF-II, as co
f new donor
conferences
enhanced u
ementation o
e and fundi
HPF-I). This
onor comm
eased confid
tization and
een an attra
s for new do
build up thro
rity needs.
grams which
allocation in
at meeting t
ocations via
nding decisi
outputs.
ents and im
be useful to
primary ob
documented
tor, the curre
reduction.
nce of the o
anging circu
entation are
h state of the
ision making
o f H e a l
cy of the Pro
HPF-II is wid
ards the mo
ation and im
hiopian hea
drawn a lot
the Paris A
ompared to
rs in the Poo
s, increased
utilization of
of WBP).
ng levels by
s increase c
itment and
dence in th
planning of
active tool
onors to part
ough time to
Thus, it ha
h desperately
the Annual
the strategic
the HPF I
ions in respo
pacts attain
o review whe
bjectives su
d in the MO
ent strategie
bjectives, fo
mstances a
e carefully e
e HPF imple
g and implem
t h P o o l e
I
oject
dely seen as
ost urgent an
mplementatio
lth sector, a
t of lessons
Agenda and
HPF-I, dem
oled Fund, i
d level of sa
the fund in h
y DPs incre
consolidated
assistance
he HPF as
f core HSD
for tradition
ticipate, poss
channel the
as the pote
y needed it.
Plan aims to
c objectives
I provided t
onse to dem
ed through
ether the ori
pporting the
OU, has a re
es of FMOH
ocus of the d
and participa
examined. T
ementation p
mentation ha
e d F u n d
Index consu
s effective, ti
nd critical ne
on process.
s a result, th
s from the
d thereby re
monstrated a
involvement
atisfaction o
harmonizatio
eased comp
the trends
e to the F
s a useful,
P activities
nal donors t
sibly becaus
eir aids with c
ntial to incr
o support the
identified in
the necessa
mands by the
HPF in the
ginal design
e HSDP. Th
elevance to
and also the
design on th
ation of sta
The evaluatio
process inclu
as been satis
sult, August,
mely, respo
eeds of HSD
The HPF i
he establish
HPF. These
each the po
advancemen
t of DPs in s
of DPs, impr
on and align
ared to prev
of the past
FMOH and
comprehe
and other h
to increase
se of the red
confidence t
rease the ov
e implement
n the HSDP.
ary flexibility
e FMOH and
past five ye
n features of
he review o
contemplate
e country’s p
he right prior
keholders in
on revealed
uding the de
sfactory.
| 15
2010
nsive
DP by
s the
hment
e are
oor in
nts in
study
roved
nment
vious
three
also
nsive
health
their
duced
that it
verall
tation
For
y and
d also
ars, I
f HPF
of the
e the
plans
rities,
n the
d that
esign,

17. F M O H
4.7. T
s
t
D
p
r
e
4.8. T
d
e
o
r
t
s
4.9. I
t
s
M
p
t
c
s
4.10.
4.11.
4.12.
4.13.
, E t h i o p
The scope o
spirit of the o
to utilize HP
Dawa, Orom
period. The
recommenda
expression o
The financia
demonstrate
expectation a
of the total c
recipients an
the responde
since there is
n the evalua
the foundatio
scheme with
MDG PF is f
per the Ethio
the DPs que
commented
same time.
The issues
was not str
evaluation.
proposed to
of HPF in to
HPF or inco
issue remai
The evaluat
objectives o
seems mini
executed u
basic intent
Document r
generic ann
the plans a
appealing fo
the availabi
The HPF d
directives m
general gu
communica
be committe
i a – E v a
of utilization
objectives o
PF-II has be
mia and Bens
review of H
ation had be
of interest or
al statemen
ed that the
and also not
contribution
nd also a mo
ents and PF
s adequate
ation proces
on of the M
h wider pers
ully adminis
opian Gover
estioned the
on the exist
contemplate
aightforward
Some of the
o continue as
o MDG PF,
orporating th
ns the same
tion tried to e
of HPF. The
imal but I al
sing compe
ion was not
reviews dur
nual plans th
re nonspeci
or more spe
lity of a room
oes not hav
mentioned in
uide in cla
tion betwee
ed.
l u a t i o n
of the HPF-
of HPF, the p
en insignific
shangul Gum
PF's docum
een sent out
r request sub
nts (as ind
amount of
t in the inten
is not spent
odest monito
FM, some of
money in the
ss I learnt th
MDG Pool F
spectives wh
tered by FM
rnment Proc
e efficiency
tence of para
ed are clear
d as such. S
e responden
s it is. Other
redirecting H
he HPF as a
e).
examine effi
e total num
lso understo
etitive funds
to congest t
ing the eva
hroughout th
ific, there w
ecific ones. R
m for the flex
ve a formall
the MOU. W
ssifying an
n fund recip
o f H e a l
-II has also
participation
cant. Only th
muz Region
ents reveale
t by the PPD
bmitted by R
icated in T
f contributio
nded objectiv
t at all. This
oring activity
the DPs did
e HPF’s acc
hat the perfo
Fund (MDG
hich apparen
MOH and pro
curement Ru
of the HPF
allel funds to
r enough to
Several solu
nts valued th
solutions pr
HPF-specific
a componen
ciency of fun
mber of oper
ood that a s
s made ava
he HPF whe
luation show
he implemen
asn’t a sing
Rather, all p
xibility of deta
y document
Without form
nd executin
pients and m
t h P o o l e
I
been asses
as well as t
hree reques
al Health Bu
ed that vario
D/FMOH. Bu
RHBs, excep
Table, 1) re
on that rem
ves of HPF.
underlines
y. In addition
dn’t actually
count.
ormance of
PF). The M
ntly has ove
ocurements a
ules and Pro
F as a sepa
o which mos
observe, pin
utions have
he essential
roposed by r
c funds from
t of MDG P
nd utilization
rational rese
significant nu
ailable throu
en alternative
wed that the
ntation of HP
gle request e
articipants i
ailed action
ted procedu
mally docume
g requests
managers co
e d F u n d
Index consu
sed in this e
the requests
sts have bee
ureaus within
ous letters o
ut there was
t those state
eviewed by
mained unut
More than a
the limited a
to this, as I
install the la
HPF had be
MDG PF is
erwhelmed t
are exclusive
ocedures. H
rate funding
st DPs are c
npointing the
been entert
l objectives
respondents
m MDG PF a
F (but still th
n in line with
earches sup
umber of stu
gh other m
es are availa
e FMOH/PP
PF-II. In spit
entertained
n the evalua
plans.
ures manual
ented proce
s, the conc
ould be lost
sult, August,
evaluation. I
s made by R
en made by
n the three y
of notification
s no docume
ed.
y the evalu
ilized is be
a quarter (32
advocacy am
have learnt
ast disburse
een exempla
a bigger fun
the HPF. Bu
ely carried o
owever, som
g entity and
ontributing a
e perfect sol
tained during
of the funds
s include me
and channel
he administr
the docume
pported via
udies have
mechanisms.
able.
PD had prod
te of the fac
in the evalu
ation apprec
except som
dures to act
cept of sm
and errors c
| 16
2010
n the
RHBs
y Dire
years
n and
ented
uation
eyond
2.9%)
mong
t from
ement
ary in
nding
ut the
out as
me of
also
at the
lution
g the
s and
erging
ed to
rative
ented
HPF
been
The
duced
t that
uation
ciated
me of
t as a
mooth
could

18. F M O H
5. Perfo
5.1. A
I
o
a
r
t
5.2. T
a
r
f
o
s
i
D
a
5.3. I
t
a
U
i
D
d
t
t
5.4. I
i
a
n
a
d
a
t
5.5. T
t
t
c
m
5.6. J
e
m
s
M
i
e
, E t h i o p
ormance of P
As per the M
I by holding
operational c
also states t
regulations,
those relatin
The reports
and summar
report; final n
final certified
operationally
statements a
nformation p
DPs. Thoug
applied to su
n the same
the commen
assistants to
UNICEF pro
mplementat
During the s
disburse as
the Fund allo
the requests
learned tha
ncluding do
and requests
not necessa
and were tr
documented
applied in su
the inconsist
The contribu
terms of the
the demand
contracting
makes excep
JCCC contin
ensuring qua
members pr
stakeholders
MOU is ad
mprovemen
efficient utiliz
i a – E v a
Partners (FM
MOU, UNICE
g, managing
cost deducte
hat the adm
rules, direct
g to interest
expected fr
ry of the acti
narrative an
d financial s
y closed. As
and consolid
pertaining to
h the repor
ubmit reports
respect, UN
nts from the
o bridge the
ovided subst
ion of HPF-I
specified pe
early as the
ocation proc
s have been
at there were
uble fund re
s made with
arily related
raced back
instructions
uch circums
tencies to em
ution from UN
flexibility of
s do not go
process, sa
ptions to rule
nued to pla
ality standar
rovide techn
s including n
dmirable. H
t including t
zation of the
l u a t i o n
MOH, DPs, a
EF has been
g and admin
ed from the
ministration o
tives and pr
t.
om UNICEF
vities undert
d financial re
statement n
s stated in t
dated report
o HPF-II wa
rts were su
s in order to
NICEF has
evaluation
e communic
tantial suppo
II, particularl
eriod, such
e TOR requir
cess. But, th
entertained
e instances o
equests (sen
h a very sho
to FMOH o
to the Fun
s, procedure
tances. The
merge.
NICEF, man
f the funds, a
o along with
alary scales
es or it takes
y a crucial
rds of projec
nical expert
non-HFP do
However, th
the limited a
fund (as in
o f H e a l
and UNICEF
n requested t
nistering the
total contrib
of the fund b
rocedures a
F include su
taken by the
eport no late
no later than
the MOU, U
ts on the im
as also prod
bmitted rela
strengthen t
relatively im
of the previ
cation gap w
ort to fill the
ly in the first
a gap surfa
red, which m
is funding ga
as usual.
of inconsiste
nd to UNICE
ort notice. S
or UNICEF’s
d’s genesis
es or manua
e absence of
naging the H
and timeline
h UNICEF’s
and other
s a lot of res
role in the
ct presentati
tise and the
onors. The o
e evaluatio
action taken
low fund exp
t h P o o l e
I
F)
to assist the
e fund. 5 %
bution will be
by UNICEF w
applicable to
mmary of q
e fund recipie
er than 6 mo
n one year
UNICEF sub
mplementatio
uced as req
atively on tim
the monitorin
mproved its f
ious HPF cy
with FMOH
e important f
t few months
aced becaus
made it diffic
ap has been
encies with t
EF and othe
Some of the
performanc
. A major f
als that coul
f such guide
ealth Pooled
ess. But it is
rules as in
issues. In s
ources to so
process of
on and sele
ere was a
overall cohe
on team ob
by the com
ploitation by
e d F u n d
Index consu
e implementa
% fee for ad
e paid to UN
will be in acc
o special acc
uarterly fina
ents; overall
onths after c
after the p
bmitted summ
on activities.
quired by th
me, more e
ng activities
fund manag
ycle and als
fund reque
funding gap
s after the in
se DPs did
cult to do pla
n filled up by
the requests
r partners a
problems e
ce per se, b
finding was
ld be used
elines is the
d Fund, has
really difficu
n time taken
such cases
ort things out
f project ap
ection for fun
balanced r
erence and
bserved are
mmittee towa
RHBs).
sult, August,
ation of the
dministration
NICEF. The
cordance wi
counts, inclu
ancial statem
annual prog
completion; a
project has
mary of fina
Other addit
e JCCC and
efforts shoul
by JCCC.
ement acce
so hired pro
ests. In add
ps throughou
itiation of HP
not commit
anning and b
y UNICEF an
s made by F
at the same
experienced
but are struc
the absenc
as guideline
major trigge
been valuab
ult at times w
n for recruitm
, either UN
t.
proval aimin
nding. The J
representatio
compliance
eas of pos
ards fosterin
| 17
2010
HPF-
n and
MOU
ith its
uding
ments
gress
and a
been
ancial
tional
d the
ld be
epting
gram
dition,
ut the
PF-II.
t and
begin
nd all
MOH
time)
were
ctural
ce of
e and
er for
ble in
when
ment,
ICEF
ng at
JCCC
on of
e with
ssible
g the

19. F M O H
Conc
The eval
funding t
continued
presente
1. Enhan
1.1. T
s
F
s
a
A
c
1.2. I
c
h
e
1.3. J
f
f
u
2. Susta
2.1. M
it
s
t
H
i
a
s
, E t h i o p
lusion a
uation team
to respond
d. There a
ed in rough o
ncing Monitor
The success
strategic obj
FMOH other
should spec
activities usi
ARMs, Work
critical health
n fact, in a
continue to e
hubs of WB
ensuring tha
JCCC should
feedback on
financing of
utilizing the f
ainability of th
Most respon
ts sustainab
solutions sug
this particula
HPF. Howev
ncurred und
apparently r
situation in d
i a – E v a
and Rec
m concluded
to priority n
re, however
order of prior
ring and Eval
s of the HP
jectives, as
r than PPD a
cifically enco
ng different
kshops, or o
h systems co
addition to i
enhance the
BP. Otherwis
t Annual Pla
d apply mor
performanc
priorities. F
fund for prim
e Health Poo
dents expre
bility, mainly
ggested incl
ar argument
ver, if we en
der the existe
reasonable.
detail to com
l u a t i o n
commen
that the Hea
needs of th
r, significant
rity as follow
uation Measu
PF should b
identified i
and RHBs ha
ourage the
methods to
others). Par
omponents.
nvolving the
e support tow
se, JCCC s
ans contemp
e efforts to f
ce and moni
For instance
mary targets.
led Fund
essed their fe
y because o
ude merging
t to hold me
ntertain the i
ence of mult
Barring th
e up with op
o f H e a l
ndations
alth Pooled
e HSDP m
t concerns t
s:
ures
be measure
n the MOU
as been insi
participatio
raise aware
rticularly em
e RHBs, th
wards the W
should not
plate the Wo
foster close
toring in ord
e, by putting
eelings of un
f existence
g of the Poo
erit from the
issues of inc
tiple Pooled
is possibilit
ptions for a w
t h P o o l e
I
s
Fund has si
ore efficient
that need to
d by the de
U. The part
ignificant in
n of RHBs
eness (cond
mphasizing th
e next gene
Woreda Heal
hesitate to
reda-level n
linkages be
der to ensure
g the ceiling
ncertainty ov
of multiple
oled Funds. T
perspective
creased tran
Funds, merg
ty, we need
way forward.
e d F u n d
Index consu
ignificant be
tly and ther
o be addres
egree to wh
ticipation of
HPF-II. The
and step
ducting advo
he access t
eration of H
th Offices s
take a mo
eeds.
tween fundi
e eligible fun
to internati
ver the future
funds. As d
The review
e of the ove
nsaction and
ging the Poo
d to carefu
.
sult, August,
enefits in allo
refore shoul
ssed. These
hich it fulfills
f departmen
refore, the J
up its advo
ocacy sessio
to TA to su
HPF should
ince they ar
re active ro
ng decisions
nd utilization
ional travels
e of the fund
discussed be
team did no
erall objectiv
d overhead
oled Funds s
ully examine
| 18
2010
owing
ld be
e are
s the
nts of
JCCC
ocacy
ons in
pport
also
re the
ole in
s and
n and
s and
d and
efore,
ot find
es of
costs
seem
e the

20. F M O H
2.2. T
i
i
r
t
t
p
c
s
w
f
2.3. R
t
I
t
p
a
s
2.4. T
b
m
v
t
a
3. Effect
3.1. T
H
o
i
r
3.2. I
t
c
t
a
n
, E t h i o p
The option o
ssue of flex
ncreased ov
rules and pro
the benefits
the basic be
process will
compete in t
strongly that
which are a
funding to H
Regardless
that can disb
n addition, t
the areas of
package of
account an
synchronizat
To this end,
basis that it
matters of H
viable, indep
the impleme
administratio
tiveness of TA
The provisio
However, co
of TA. The
ntended ski
rather than a
deally, the r
to be based
combined to
to know for
activities of F
nearly every
i a – E v a
of merging is
xibility and s
verhead cos
ocedure, the
of employin
enefits of in
be more cum
the market a
t more effor
already deliv
PF.
of all, the de
burse quickly
the HPF cou
f eligible fina
MDG PF f
d continued
tion of the fu
, the evalua
is flexible, s
HSDP. By co
pendent and
entation of H
on of the fun
A, Needs and
n of TAs ha
omplex probl
e main cha
ll transfer, m
as a means t
recruitment,
on an Actio
o a set of so
sure if the
FMOH. The
one recogni
l u a t i o n
s not merely
speed are m
sts. Second
e flexibility a
ng a Fund A
tended purp
mbersome w
and hire capa
rt should be
vering. This
ecision shou
y and efficie
uld also be
ancing for M
und, allocat
d to be m
unds.
ation conclud
speedy and
ontinuing to
d demand-dr
HSDP. Hen
d should stil
d Impact Asse
s significant
lems arise in
allenge, tho
mainly becau
to build long
contracting
on Plan that
und baseline
provision of
e needs and
zes more wo
o f H e a l
y safe; rathe
more acute
d, since FM
and timelines
Administrato
pose of the
with possibil
able and mo
e devoted to
s provides
uld be based
ently in orde
considered
MDG PF is
ted for TA,
managed b
des that the
also helps t
contribute t
riven fund ou
ce, as per t
ll continue w
essment
tly contribute
n the whole
ugh, remain
use the cons
-term and su
and second
is grounded
e indicators
f TAs is hav
impact asse
ork needs to
t h P o o l e
I
er it comes w
in the perfo
MOH operate
ss of disburs
r will not be
HPF. For i
ity of greate
otivated cons
o making e
another go
d on the ne
er to support
as part of th
the provisio
could be d
by UNICEF.
e continuity
to better gro
to the HPF,
utside the M
the evaluatio
with UNICEF
ed to the ach
process of r
ns ensuring
sultants are
ustainable c
dment of con
d in a more
that measu
ving an imp
essment is a
o be done in
e d F u n d
Index consu
with several
ormance of
es as per th
sement wou
e available, w
nstance, the
r delays and
sultants. So
xisting fund
od reason
ed for a fun
t the HSDP t
he MDG PF
on of TA. H
directly chan
. This way
of HPF is j
ound decisio
, DPs ensur
MDG Pooled
on results, I
.
hievement H
ecruitment a
g TA effecti
deployed in
apacity.
nsultants to t
thorough ne
re the outpu
act on the c
n important
this area.
sult, August,
l risks. Firs
HSDP than
he governm
ld be lost. T
which will d
e fund exec
d also difficu
ome DPs als
ing mechan
to maintain
nding mecha
to fulfill its g
F because o
Hence, a sp
nneled to H
y there wil
justifiable on
ns for the u
re that there
Fund to su
recommend
HSDP’s objec
and manage
iveness and
a gap-filling
the FMOH n
eeds assess
uts. This will
capacity bu
step forward
| 19
2010
t, the
n the
ment’s
Third,
defeat
cution
ulty to
so felt
nisms
n the
anism
goals.
ne of
ecific
HPF’s
ll be
n the
rgent
e is a
pport
d the
ctive.
ement
d the
g role
needs
sment
l help
ilding
d, but

21. F M O H
, E t h i o p i a – E v a l u a t i o n o f H e a l t h P o o l e
I
e d F u n d
Index consu
sult, August,
| 20
2010

22. F M O H
• F
• O
• P
• T
, E t h i o p
Full Name
Organizatio
Position ___
Type of inv
i a – E v a
__________
on________
__________
volvement
l u a t i o n
__________
__________
___________
in the HP
o f H e a l
Ques
___________
___________
__________
F ________
t h P o o l e
I
stionnaire co
___________
__________
__________
___________
e d F u n d
Index consu
ode # ____
____
____
____
__
sult, August,
__________
| 21
2010
____

23. A
1
2
3
4
5
6
F M O H
A. General
1) Are you a
Yes,
2) What is t
• D
• F
• JC
• R
• F
• C
• O
3) What are
________
________
________
4) What wa
________
________
5) What is y
________
________
________
6) Who are
________
________
________
________
________
________
, E t h i o p
aware that t
No
the role of yo
Donor,
MOH
CCC membe
RHB
und Adminis
Contractor/Cl
Other
e the objectiv
__________
__________
__________
s the amoun
__________
__________
your opinion
__________
__________
__________
the major c
__________
__________
__________
__________
__________
__________
i a – E v a
the Health Po
our organiza
er,
stration,
ient,
ves of the H
___________
___________
___________
nt fund raise
___________
___________
on the scop
___________
___________
___________
contributors
___________
___________
___________
___________
___________
___________
l u a t i o n
ool Fund (H
ation in the H
HPF?
__________
__________
__________
ed and durat
__________
__________
pe (adequac
__________
__________
__________
of the Healt
__________
__________
__________
__________
__________
__________
o f H e a l
PF) Exists?
Health Pool
_________
_________
_________
tion of the H
_________
_________
cy, eligible ar
_________
_________
_________
h Pool fund?
_________
_________
_________
_________
_________
_________
t h P o o l e
I
Fund?
HPF?
reas) of Hea
?
e d F u n d
Index consu
alth Pool Fun
sult, August,
nd (HPF)?
| 22
2010

24. B
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
F M O H
B. Relevan
1) Is the wo
stakehold
Yes,
________
________
2) What is H
________
________
________
3) Are all th
Yes,
4) What are
________
________
________
5) How do y
(Highly sat
6) Are there
Yes,
If yes, pl
________
________
7) Are there
Yes,
If yes, pl
________
________
________
, E t h i o p
nce
ork of Health
ders? If your
No
__________
__________
HPF’s compa
__________
__________
__________
he requests r
No
e the areas m
__________
__________
__________
you rate the
tisfactory [5], S
e any proble
No
ease mentio
__________
__________
e any proble
No
ease mentio
__________
__________
__________
i a – E v a
h Pool Fund
r answer is N
___________
___________
arative advan
___________
___________
___________
received and
most often re
___________
___________
___________
degree of p
Satisfactory [4
ms in the de
on the proble
___________
___________
ms in the im
on the proble
___________
___________
___________
l u a t i o n
(HPF) cons
No, please e
__________
__________
ntage relativ
__________
__________
__________
d executed in
equested fo
__________
__________
__________
political com
4], fairly satisfa
esign of the
ems
__________
__________
mplementatio
ems
__________
__________
__________
o f H e a l
sistent with t
explain.
_________
_________
ve to other a
_________
_________
_________
n line with H
r funding?
_________
_________
_________
mitment am
actory [3], Less
Health Pool
_________
_________
on or commi
_________
_________
_________
t h P o o l e
I
the developm
alternatives c
Health Pool F
mong key sta
s satisfactory [
Fund [HPF]
issioning of t
e d F u n d
Index consu
ment strateg
covering sim
Fund (HPF) p
keholders? _
2], Not satisfa
]?
the Health P
sult, August,
gy of its prin
milar issues?
proposal?
______
actory [1])
Pool Fund [H
| 23
2010
ncipal
HPF]?

25. C
1
2
3
4
5
6
F M O H
C. Coheren
1) In your
implemen
Yes,
2) Are HPF’s
Yes,
a) D
b) W
__
__
3) What has
of HSDP
________
________
________
4) Are the b
effort?
Yes,
5) Why only
for other
________
________
________
6) How do
appropria
(Highly sat
, E t h i o p
nce
opinion, w
ntation of HS
No
s time lines,
No
Do you think
Yes,
What needs t
__________
__________
s been the v
III? Please w
__________
__________
__________
benefits of H
No
y few donors
donors for
__________
__________
__________
you rate th
ate for the a
tisfactory [5], S
i a – E v a
was Health
SDP III?
milestones
the HPF sho
No
to be improv
___________
___________
value-added
write below,
___________
___________
___________
Health Pool F
s committed
not joining t
___________
___________
___________
he extent to
attainment o
Satisfactory [4
l u a t i o n
Pool Fund
and targets
ould continu
ved in HPF II
__________
__________
of the Healt
,
__________
__________
__________
Fund [HPF] c
d to Health P
the HPF?
__________
__________
__________
o which the
f its objectiv
4], fairly satisfa
o f H e a l
d [HPF] a
appropriate
e as it is?
II?
____
____
th Pool Fund
_________
_________
_________
commensura
Pool Fund [H
_________
_________
_____
Health Poo
ves? ______
actory [3], Less
t h P o o l e
I
viable opt
e?
d to support
ate with inpu
HPF]? What d
ol Fund desi
___
s satisfactory [
e d F u n d
Index consu
tion for st
t the implem
uts in terms
do you think
ign and stra
2], Not satisfa
sult, August,
rengthening
mentation pro
of cost, time
k are the rea
ategy sound
actory [1])
| 24
2010
g the
ocess
e and
asons
d and

26. D
F
1
2
3
4
F
5
6
7
8
F M O H
D. Efficienc
Fund Utiliza
1) Did the P
of HPF?
Yes,
2) In your o
spirit of i
Ye
3) Did the
through U
Ye
4) How do y
requests
(Highly sat
Fund Appro
5) How muc
_____
6) How do y
(Highly sat
• Regu
• Effect
• Atten
7) How do y
(Highly sat
• Monit
• Trans
• Time
• Feedb
8) How do
_______
(Highly sat
, E t h i o p
cy
ation
PPD-FMOH h
opinion did t
ts purpose?
es,
PPD-FMOH
UNICEF?
es,
you rate the
for funding?
tisfactory [5], S
oval
ch time does
__ (please sp
you rate the
tisfactory [5], S
larity of the
tiveness of t
ndance by al
you rate JCC
tisfactory [5], S
toring mecha
sparency___
liness______
back mecha
you rate JC
tisfactory [5], S
i a – E v a
have annual
No
the PPD-FMO
No
follow the
No
e overall resp
? _______
Satisfactory [4
s the JCCC ta
specify in hour
JCCC’s mee
Satisfactory [4
meetings__
the meetings
l members__
CC's approva
Satisfactory [4
anisms_____
_____
__
nisms_____
CCC's overall
Satisfactory [4
l u a t i o n
expenditure
OH ensured
standard pr
ponsibility of
4], fairly satisfa
ake, on aver
rs, days, week
etings in term
4], fairly satisfa
_______
s________
_____
al process fo
4], fairly satisfa
__
____
l decision m
4], fairly satisfa
o f H e a l
e/action plan
the appropr
rocedures to
f PPD-FMOH
actory [3], Less
rage, to app
eks, or months
ms of:
actory [3], Less
r the HPF as
actory [3], Less
making proce
actory [3], Less
t h P o o l e
I
n for approp
riate and eff
o authorize
H for receivin
s satisfactory [
prove a requ
s)
s satisfactory [
s per the MO
s satisfactory [
ess in alloca
s satisfactory [
e d F u n d
Index consu
priate and ef
ficient use o
the execut
ng, processin
2], Not satisfa
est for fundi
2], Not satisfa
OU in terms
2], Not satisfa
ting and uti
2], Not satisfa
sult, August,
fficient utiliz
of the fund i
ion of the
ng and appro
actory [1])
ing?
actory [1])
of:
actory [1])
ilizing resou
actory [1])
| 25
2010
zation
n the
plans
oving
rces?

27. F
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1
F M O H
Fund Admin
1) Were all
schedule
Ye
If not
_____
_____
2) Are all th
Ye
3) How muc
_____
4) Do you
managing
Ye
5) How do y
(Highly sat
6) How do y
(Highly sat
• Less
• Trans
7) How do y
for JCCC
(Highly sat
• Time
• Accur
8) How do y
(Highly sat
• Trans
• Clear
9) How do y
(Highly sat
10) Do you t
continued
Ye
If No
, E t h i o p
nistration
contributio
?
es,
t, what mea
__________
__________
he required p
es,
ch time does
_____ (pleas
think the h
g the fund?
es,
you rate effi
tisfactory [5], S
you rate the
tisfactory [5], S
cumbersome
sparency___
you rate the
and HPF pa
tisfactory [5], S
liness______
racy_______
you rate the
tisfactory [5], S
sparency of
r TOR for ass
you rate the
tisfactory [5], S
think the ad
d by UNICEF
es,
, please spe
i a – E v a
ns by HPF
No
sures were t
___________
___________
procedures a
No
s UNICEF tak
se specify in h
human resou
No
ciency of the
Satisfactory [4
administrat
Satisfactory [4
eness______
______;
e financial st
artners in ter
Satisfactory [4
__
__
selection of
Satisfactory [4
selection___
signment___
overall fund
Satisfactory [4
dministration
F?
No
ecify _______
l u a t i o n
Donors rece
taken by UN
__________
__________
adhere to up
ke, on avera
hours, days, w
urce allocat
e process of
4], fairly satisfa
tion of the H
4], fairly satisfa
_;
tatements, p
rms of:
4], fairly satisfa
f clients and
4], fairly satisfa
___
____
d administra
4], fairly satisfa
n and mana
__________
o f H e a l
eived on tim
NICEF to man
___________
___________
pon request
age, to proce
weeks, or mo
ted by UNIC
f the procure
actory [3], Less
HPF by UNIC
actory [3], Less
progress repo
actory [3], Less
contracting
actory [3], Less
tion process
actory [3], Less
agement of
___________
t h P o o l e
I
me and acc
nage funding
__
__
for spending
ess an autho
onths)
CEF is adeq
ement of ser
s satisfactory [
EF/Ethiopia
s satisfactory [
Flexibility_
Timelines
orts produce
s satisfactory [
process in t
s satisfactory [
s by UNICEF
s satisfactory [
the Health
__________
e d F u n d
Index consu
cording to t
g gaps?
g?
orized spend
quate for ad
rvice and go
2], Not satisfa
in terms of:
2], Not satisfa
______
ss_______
ed and subm
2], Not satisfa
terms of:
2], Not satisfa
F/Ethiopia? _
2], Not satisfa
Pool Fund
___________
sult, August,
he disburse
ding?
dministering
ods? _____
actory [1])
actory [1])
mitted by UN
actory [1])
actory [1])
_____
actory [1])
[HPF] shou
________
| 26
2010
ement
g and
___
NICEF
ld be

28. E
1
2
3
4
F M O H
E. Impact
1) What are
implemen
________
________
________
2) What w
documen
a) Short
_____
_____
_____
b) Possi
_____
_____
_____
c) What
_____
_____
d) What
_____
_____
3) How do y
donor en
(Highly sat
4) What is y
_______
(Highly sat
, E t h i o p
e the contri
ntation of HS
__________
__________
____________
were the ou
nted]?
t-term outco
__________
__________
___________
ble long-term
__________
__________
___________
t do you per
__________
__________
t do you per
__________
__________
you rate the
ngagement?
tisfactory [5], S
your overall
tisfactory [5], S
i a – E v a
butions of t
SDP?
___________
___________
___________
utputs of
omes
___________
___________
____________
m impacts o
___________
___________
____________
ceive as the
___________
___________
ceive as the
___________
___________
e effectivene
_______
Satisfactory [4
rating of th
Satisfactory [4
l u a t i o n
the Health P
__________
__________
____________
HPF implem
__________
__________
___________
on the groun
__________
__________
___________
e greatest su
__________
__________
e greatest ch
__________
__________
ess of the H
4], fairly satisfa
he extent of
4], fairly satisfa
o f H e a l
Pool Fund [
_________
_________
_________
mentation [
___________
___________
____________
d
___________
___________
____________
ccesses rega
________
________
hallenges reg
________
___________
Health Pool F
actory [3], Less
f achieveme
actory [3], Less
t h P o o l e
I
HPF] in the
[quantitative
__
__
__
__
__
__
arding Healt
garding Heal
__
Fund [HPF]
s satisfactory [
ent Health Po
s satisfactory [
e d F u n d
Index consu
e harmonizat
e and qual
th Pool Fund
lth Pool Fund
as a working
2], Not satisfa
ool Fund [H
2], Not satisfa
sult, August,
tion process
litative sha
d [HPF]?
d [HPF]?
g-model for
actory [1])
HPF]'s object
actory [1])
| 27
2010
s and
ll be
joint
tives?

29. F
1
2
G
1
2
H
3
I
1
2
F M O H
F. Owners
1) Did your
Yes,
2) Did your
Yes,
G. Sustaina
1) Do you th
Yes,
2) Are resou
Yes,
H. Institut
3) Do the m
Ye
I. Governa
1) Are the i
appropria
Ye
2) Are the g
Ye
, E t h i o p
hip and Ha
organization
organization
ability
hink that He
urces adequ
ional Align
members and
es,
ance
nteractions,
ate?
es,
governance p
es,
i a – E v a
armonizatio
n participate
No
n play any ro
No
ealth Pool Fu
No
ate to susta
No
nment
d donors in t
No
structure, r
No
procedures o
No
l u a t i o n
on
e in the desig
ole in the po
und achievem
in progress?
the HPF repr
role and aut
of HPF adeq
o f H e a l
gn and/or im
opularization
ments will en
?
resent the ke
hority of the
quate in term
t h P o o l e
I
mplementatio
n of HPF stak
ndure?
ey partners
e HPF and it
ms of transpa
e d F u n d
Index consu
on of the HP
keholders?
in the count
ts related go
arency and o
sult, August,
PF?
try?
overnance b
objectivity?
| 28
2010
odies

30. J
F M O H
J. Overall
3) Do yo
Ye
1) How
• O
• D
• Im
• M
(Highly
2) What
mitig
_____
_____
____
3) What
[HPF]
____
_____
____
4) How
count
(Highly
5) How
(Highly
, E t h i o p
ou think the
es,
do you rate
Objectives___
Design______
mplementati
Monitoring___
y satisfactory [
t barriers to
ated?
__________
__________
__________
t improveme
]?
__________
__________
__________
do you c
tries/standar
y satisfactory [
do you rate
y satisfactory [
i a – E v a
efficiency o
No
the strength
_____
_
ion_______
_____
[5], Satisfactor
effective ut
___________
___________
__________
ents do you
__________
___________
__________
compare the
rds? ______
[5], Satisfactor
the overall
[5], Satisfactor
l u a t i o n
of implement
h and weakn
ry [4], fairly sa
tilization of
__________
__________
_________
suggest for
_________
__________
_________
e achievem
__
ry [4], fairly sa
performance
ry [4], fairly sa
o f H e a l
tation of HPF
ness of the H
atisfactory [3],
HPF have b
___________
___________
__________
r better imp
__________
___________
__________
ment of HP
atisfactory [3],
e of HPF? __
atisfactory [3],
t h P o o l e
I
F-II has imp
HPF in terms
, Less satisfacto
been encoun
__
__
__
plementation
__
__
__
PF relative
, Less satisfacto
_____
, Less satisfacto
e d F u n d
Index consu
roved comp
s of
ory [2], Not sa
ntered and h
n of future H
to best pr
ory [2], Not sa
ory [2], Not sa
sult, August,
ared to HPF
atisfactory [1])
how can the
Health Pool
ractice in
atisfactory [1])
atisfactory [1])
| 29
2010
-I?
)
ey be
Fund
other
)
)

31. F M O H
1) L
L
F
D
I
A
I
T
J
H
R
C
, E t h i o p
List of Eva
List of Gover
Federal Dem
Department
Italian Co‐op
Austrian Dev
Irish Aid (IA)
The United N
JCCC Membe
Health Pool F
Regional Hea
Client/contra
i a – E v a
aluation Pa
nment Institu
ocratic Repu
For Internati
eration(IC)
velopment Co
Nations Childr
ers and Organ
Fund Adminis
alth Bureaus (
actor
l u a t i o n
articipants
utions and O
blic of Ethiop
onal Develop
ooperation (A
ren’s Fund in
nizations oth
strator, UNIC
(Oromiya or
o f H e a l
s
rganizations
pia, Ministry
pment (DFID)
ADC)
Ethiopia (UN
her than the H
CEF
Addis Ababa
t h P o o l e
I
of Health (FM
)
NICEF Ethiopi
HPF Donors
RHB)
e d F u n d
Index consu
MOH)
a)
Total
sult, August,
# of respond
4
1
1
2
1
2
2
3
1
1
18
| 30
2010
dents