The days when an attorney can simply try a case based solely on oral testimony are gone. With technology, a whole new generation of jurors now expect more visual and illustrative evidence than ever. Their attention span is short. Their patience span is even shorter. To capture attention, attorneys must must employ compelling and powerful demonstrative evidence to educate, inform, and captivate. This paper is written for personal injury and trial lawyers about the use of demonstrative evidence and provide ideas and tips on creating and using them.
This document provides guidance on designing the front page layout of a broadsheet newspaper including formatting the masthead, headlines, images, advertisements, body text, pull quotes, and multiple stories. It lists the key design elements to include on each page such as the masthead, headlines, images, body text, advertisements, and pull quotes.
This document summarizes the culture of Brunei. It introduces the group members and their roles for a project on Brunei culture. It then provides essential questions about culture and answers about Brunei culture, noting its similarities to Malay cultures and challenges of modernization. Interview questions and answers from an interviewee about weaving are also included. Finally, potential solutions to preserving cultural heritage through weaving are proposed, such as practicing with experts, setting up weaving clubs, and honoring ancestors' rituals.
Answer these questions in a paragraph or more. Use teh prompts belowbrockdebroah
Answer these questions in a paragraph or more. Use teh prompts below for assistance.
1)
Describe how the Daubert Standard differs from the Frye Standard.
The
Frye Standard
involves the general acceptance of a theory or technique within the field of science. Basically, if it’s good enough for the scientific community, it’s good enough to be presented in court. This is still the standard in many states.
The
Daubert Standard
has been accepted at the federal level and is the standard in several states. The
Daubert Standard
uses the
Frye Standard
as one of its prongs of its reliability component (in addition to whether the theory can be tested, whether the error rate is acceptable, and whether the theory has faced peer review). In addition to reliability, the court must decide whether the testimony is relevant to the case and whether its probative value outweighs the potential prejudice it will produce.
Although several answers discussed that
Daubert
was an “improvement” over
Frye
, it really just added more requirements without increasing the scientific rigor. Some of these requirements are redundant. For example, if a theory is
generally accepted
within a
scientific discipline
, it’s going to be (a) peer reviewed and (b) testable. The requirement of “an acceptable error rate” sounds nice, but because no one has ever defined what constitutes an acceptable error rate, it’s kind of meaningless. The biggest actual difference involves the “relevance” and “legal sufficiency” components. These are both determined by the court. Thus, even if the science is sound, the court can prevent the testimony if the court wants to. In practice, this can be very subjective. In fact, in cases like
Daubert
, the court often prevents scientific testimony about increased vulnerability or rates of exposure because it views the relationship between the cause and effect as tenuous. For instance, I’ve read cases where an epidiomological analysis of the effect of a particular chemical on a particular health issue was judged to be too prejudicial (e.g., “You say that Chemical X causes cancer, but people who have no exposure to Chemical X get cancer, so how do you know that this particular chemical caused this particular case of cancer? Maybe the plaintiff would have gotten cancer anyway.”). So, the biggest difference between the two standards is that a lot of the deference to science has been decreased in favor of the discretion of the judge.
Now, I don’t expect you to know or state all of these things, but I do expect you to do more than copy and paste information from the PowerPoint slides. You should give some analysis.
2)
What are some advantages that Science has over other ways of knowing?
The main difference between science and other ways of knowing is that it involves a falsifiable test. In fact, several elements of science can appear in logical deduction; that’s why hypotheses have to be logical and based on previous observation. To some e ...
This document discusses the importance of storytelling in litigation. It argues that opening statements are the most important part of a trial because they establish the framework and context through which jurors will view the evidence. Research shows that as many as 80% of jurors make up their minds after opening statements. The document provides tips for crafting an effective story and narrative for jurors, including reducing complex facts to relatable human experiences and using descriptive language and metaphors to engage jurors' emotions and imagination. It notes litigators can learn from techniques used in soap operas and other narrative forms to more fully activate jurors' brains.
Auto Injury Litigation From Start to Finish Woodrow Glass
This document discusses the importance of thoroughly investigating potential cases before filing litigation. It recommends conducting a case screening which includes reviewing jury instructions and similar past cases. The initial client interview and questionnaire are important for gathering accurate facts and assessing if the client will be likeable to a potential jury. Pre-suit investigation should include obtaining relevant documents like medical records, accident reports, social media, and background checks. Developing an expense budget is also recommended to evaluate if the likely case value justifies costs. Thorough pre-filing investigation helps maximize case value and increases the chances of a successful outcome for both the client and attorney.
Auto Injury Litigation From Start to FinishWoodrow Glass
This document discusses the importance of thoroughly screening potential cases before accepting representation. It emphasizes reviewing elements and facts needed to prove legal theories, researching recent verdicts, monitoring social media, and carefully evaluating the client's likability and version of events during an initial interview. Conducting pre-suit investigation helps avoid disappointment from adverse rulings or defense verdicts that could result from hastily filed cases without properly screening facts and legal viability first.
The document discusses tips for preparing witnesses to testify effectively in court. It recommends that witnesses familiarize themselves with the courtroom process through mock direct and cross examinations. Witnesses should listen carefully to each question and only answer what is asked rather than offering extra information. They should feel comfortable asking for clarification if a question is unclear and acknowledging when they do not know or remember something. Witnesses also need to thoroughly review any documents they are asked about on the stand to avoid being impeached. Overall, answers should be short, polite, and address only the question that was asked.
The document discusses tips for preparing witnesses to testify effectively in court. It recommends that witnesses familiarize themselves with the courtroom process through mock direct and cross examinations. Witnesses should listen carefully to each question asked and only answer what is asked rather than providing unnecessary information. It is okay for witnesses to admit when they do not know or remember something. Witnesses should thoroughly review any documents shown to them before answering questions about them. Answers should be short, polite, and address only the question asked. Preparing witnesses in this way can help reduce their anxiety and allow them to communicate more clearly and effectively.
This document provides guidance on designing the front page layout of a broadsheet newspaper including formatting the masthead, headlines, images, advertisements, body text, pull quotes, and multiple stories. It lists the key design elements to include on each page such as the masthead, headlines, images, body text, advertisements, and pull quotes.
This document summarizes the culture of Brunei. It introduces the group members and their roles for a project on Brunei culture. It then provides essential questions about culture and answers about Brunei culture, noting its similarities to Malay cultures and challenges of modernization. Interview questions and answers from an interviewee about weaving are also included. Finally, potential solutions to preserving cultural heritage through weaving are proposed, such as practicing with experts, setting up weaving clubs, and honoring ancestors' rituals.
Answer these questions in a paragraph or more. Use teh prompts belowbrockdebroah
Answer these questions in a paragraph or more. Use teh prompts below for assistance.
1)
Describe how the Daubert Standard differs from the Frye Standard.
The
Frye Standard
involves the general acceptance of a theory or technique within the field of science. Basically, if it’s good enough for the scientific community, it’s good enough to be presented in court. This is still the standard in many states.
The
Daubert Standard
has been accepted at the federal level and is the standard in several states. The
Daubert Standard
uses the
Frye Standard
as one of its prongs of its reliability component (in addition to whether the theory can be tested, whether the error rate is acceptable, and whether the theory has faced peer review). In addition to reliability, the court must decide whether the testimony is relevant to the case and whether its probative value outweighs the potential prejudice it will produce.
Although several answers discussed that
Daubert
was an “improvement” over
Frye
, it really just added more requirements without increasing the scientific rigor. Some of these requirements are redundant. For example, if a theory is
generally accepted
within a
scientific discipline
, it’s going to be (a) peer reviewed and (b) testable. The requirement of “an acceptable error rate” sounds nice, but because no one has ever defined what constitutes an acceptable error rate, it’s kind of meaningless. The biggest actual difference involves the “relevance” and “legal sufficiency” components. These are both determined by the court. Thus, even if the science is sound, the court can prevent the testimony if the court wants to. In practice, this can be very subjective. In fact, in cases like
Daubert
, the court often prevents scientific testimony about increased vulnerability or rates of exposure because it views the relationship between the cause and effect as tenuous. For instance, I’ve read cases where an epidiomological analysis of the effect of a particular chemical on a particular health issue was judged to be too prejudicial (e.g., “You say that Chemical X causes cancer, but people who have no exposure to Chemical X get cancer, so how do you know that this particular chemical caused this particular case of cancer? Maybe the plaintiff would have gotten cancer anyway.”). So, the biggest difference between the two standards is that a lot of the deference to science has been decreased in favor of the discretion of the judge.
Now, I don’t expect you to know or state all of these things, but I do expect you to do more than copy and paste information from the PowerPoint slides. You should give some analysis.
2)
What are some advantages that Science has over other ways of knowing?
The main difference between science and other ways of knowing is that it involves a falsifiable test. In fact, several elements of science can appear in logical deduction; that’s why hypotheses have to be logical and based on previous observation. To some e ...
This document discusses the importance of storytelling in litigation. It argues that opening statements are the most important part of a trial because they establish the framework and context through which jurors will view the evidence. Research shows that as many as 80% of jurors make up their minds after opening statements. The document provides tips for crafting an effective story and narrative for jurors, including reducing complex facts to relatable human experiences and using descriptive language and metaphors to engage jurors' emotions and imagination. It notes litigators can learn from techniques used in soap operas and other narrative forms to more fully activate jurors' brains.
Auto Injury Litigation From Start to Finish Woodrow Glass
This document discusses the importance of thoroughly investigating potential cases before filing litigation. It recommends conducting a case screening which includes reviewing jury instructions and similar past cases. The initial client interview and questionnaire are important for gathering accurate facts and assessing if the client will be likeable to a potential jury. Pre-suit investigation should include obtaining relevant documents like medical records, accident reports, social media, and background checks. Developing an expense budget is also recommended to evaluate if the likely case value justifies costs. Thorough pre-filing investigation helps maximize case value and increases the chances of a successful outcome for both the client and attorney.
Auto Injury Litigation From Start to FinishWoodrow Glass
This document discusses the importance of thoroughly screening potential cases before accepting representation. It emphasizes reviewing elements and facts needed to prove legal theories, researching recent verdicts, monitoring social media, and carefully evaluating the client's likability and version of events during an initial interview. Conducting pre-suit investigation helps avoid disappointment from adverse rulings or defense verdicts that could result from hastily filed cases without properly screening facts and legal viability first.
The document discusses tips for preparing witnesses to testify effectively in court. It recommends that witnesses familiarize themselves with the courtroom process through mock direct and cross examinations. Witnesses should listen carefully to each question and only answer what is asked rather than offering extra information. They should feel comfortable asking for clarification if a question is unclear and acknowledging when they do not know or remember something. Witnesses also need to thoroughly review any documents they are asked about on the stand to avoid being impeached. Overall, answers should be short, polite, and address only the question that was asked.
The document discusses tips for preparing witnesses to testify effectively in court. It recommends that witnesses familiarize themselves with the courtroom process through mock direct and cross examinations. Witnesses should listen carefully to each question asked and only answer what is asked rather than providing unnecessary information. It is okay for witnesses to admit when they do not know or remember something. Witnesses should thoroughly review any documents shown to them before answering questions about them. Answers should be short, polite, and address only the question asked. Preparing witnesses in this way can help reduce their anxiety and allow them to communicate more clearly and effectively.
Chapter 21 - The Investigator and the Legal System1.docxwalterl4
Chapter 21 - The Investigator and the Legal System
1
The decisions investigators must make involve a great deal of discretion.
Investigators must consider what may be termed risk factors.
2
Investigators must consider what may be termed risk factors.
Some police officers and criminal investigators are not fully aware of the order in
3
which a trial is conducted because time often prohibits them from attending a
complete trail from beginning to end. Also, witnesses are often sequestered from
the courtroom before and after giving testimony. This very common practice is used
to minimize the possibility that a witness’s testimony might be affected by other
witnesses’ testimony.
The courtroom process begins with the selection and swearing in of a jury. Jury
selection can last a few hours or a few weeks, depending on the selection process
and the nature of the case. The jury panel from whom the jurors in the trial will
eventually be picked is called a venire.
The steps in the trial process include: direct examination, cross-examination,
redirect examination, re-cross examination, the rebuttal, surrebuttal, and closing
arguments.
Evidence can be defined as anything that tends logically to prove or disprove
a fact at issue in a judicial case or controversy.
4
a fact at issue in a judicial case or controversy.
The rules of evidence are designed primarily to keep a jury from hearing or
seeing improper evidence, and the first rule of evidence is designed to set
parameters on the above definition of evidence.
Proof may be defined as the combination of all those facts—of all the evidence—in
5
determining the guilt or innocence of a person accused of a crime.
The pie chart above illustrates how several different pieces of evidence can
be put together in order to constitute proof of guilt.
6
be put together in order to constitute proof of guilt.
The doctrine of judicial notice is an evidentiary shortcut. Judicial notice is designed
7
to speed up the trial and eliminate the necessity of formally proving the truth of a
particular matter when the truth is not in dispute.
Direct Evidence
8
Direct evidence usually is the testimony of witnesses that ties the defendant
directly to the commission of the crime, such as the testimony of an
eyewitness who can positively state that the defendant committed the crime.
Real Evidence
Sometimes referred to as “physical evidence,” real evidence is connected
with the commission of the crime and can be produced in court.
Demonstrative Evidence
Demonstrative, or illustrative, evidence is not identical to real evidence even
though the items introduced are tangible. It consists of maps, diagrams,
sketches, photographs, tape recordings, videotapes, X-rays, and visual tests
and demonstrations produced to assist witnesses in explaining their
testimony.
Circumstantial Evidence
9
It is a myth that one cannot be convicted of a crime solely o.
The not so secret service rules for the modern the barrister magazineDouglas McPherson
More and more barristers are engaging in client service review programmes but what do they achieve? What will you learn from talking to your clients? And how will that insight benefit Chambers?
This document discusses deception detection and the challenges of determining when someone is lying. It makes three key points:
1) Humans are generally poor at detecting deception, performing only slightly better than chance. We rely on incorrect cues and overestimate our own abilities.
2) While some think looking someone in the eye helps determine lies, research shows liars can control facial expressions better while truth-tellers are less aware, so eye contact reduces accuracy.
3) Asking direct questions about lying, like "are you telling the truth," may increase transparency compared to indirect questions, as it puts more pressure on liars to maintain deception while honest people have natural emotional responses. However, it also risks liars
Communicating With Jurors About Money Seminar Power Pointmccormick
A PowerPoint providing defense counsel with practical advice on how to counter plaintiff’s counsel’s attempts to maximize damage awards by developing the defendant’s own theme, choosing “low” damage jurors and persuasively attacking damages during closing argument.
The document discusses various topics related to witness preparation by lawyers. It notes that witness preparation is not directly regulated and there is little case law or scholarly literature on the topic. While lawyers have a duty to zealously represent clients, they cannot knowingly assist witnesses to testify falsely or commit perjury. The document discusses challenges around distinguishing proper witness preparation from improper coaching. It also discusses techniques used in witness preparation like "the lecture" and debates around simultaneous witness interviews. Overall, the document examines the ethical boundaries and gray areas of lawyers preparing witnesses for testimony or deposition.
Christopher Benvenuto
Collene Walter
What can you expect when you are called upon to act as an expert witness in a matter? This session will help planners prepare for testifying as an expert at depositions, in court, and at quasijudicial
hearings. Common strategies for effective testimony on direct and cross examination, and ways to avoid potential pitfalls will be discussed among other important practical considerations
when testifying as an expert.
1) The document summarizes a panel discussion with Jannie Bester on conclusion terminology and scales used in signature and handwriting examination.
2) Bester uses a 5-scale terminology in their lab: (1) above any reasonable doubt did not write, (2) on a balance of probabilities did not write, (3) inconclusive, (4) on a balance of probabilities did write, (5) above any reasonable doubt did write.
3) Bester believes the 5-scale terminology is the most appropriate as it provides clear conclusions that can be easily understood in a legal context, while other scales cause confusion in judicial proceedings.
Recognize Potential Traumatic Vestibular InjuriesEdward K. Le
Vestibular injuries are common following automobile accidents and falls. However, it is often overlooked by attorneys who fail to recognize it and assist their client to find the appropriate medical specialist. This presentation is to help attorneys identify and recognize a serious medical condition that is often overlooked.
Handling the Dram Shop & Alcohol Overservice CaseEdward K. Le
Litigating and prosecuting the dram shop and alcohol over-service case is notoriously difficult. This presentation discusses practical strategies for the attorney handling such a case.
Litigating and handling the stairway fall caseEdward K. Le
There are many issues that must be dealt with by attorneys who represent clients injured in stairway fall cases. This presentation is a primer on some of the key issues that a lawyer should look for in pursuing liability against the landowner.
Strategies to Maximize Recovery in the Mild Traumatic Brain Injury CaseEdward K. Le
Prosecuting the mild traumatic brain injury (“mTBI”) case is a multi-faceted endeavor. It requires not only understanding the medicine, but also identifying the providers who can give our client the appropriate treatment health providers to ensure their path to recovery. It also requires effectively presenting your client’s case in the most effective manner to obtain the type of compensation that can help them live out a productive and meaningful life after the legal ordeal is over. According to the National Head Injury Foundation, there are approximately two million Americans who will suffer a traumatic brain injury every year. Of this, mild traumatic brain injury accounts for seventy five percent [75%] or more of those brain injuries. Automobile collisions are one of the most common causes of traumatic brain injury. Yet, there are medical research that shows people with mTBI can be left with disabling symptoms that leads to permanent and profound impairments in their life, work, and activities of daily living.
Unfortunately, because the vast majority of victims “appear normal” and are not usually self-aware of their own problems, it is also known as “silent epidemic” according to the Center for Disease Control. Hence, many persons with mild traumatic brain injuries are often victimized due to a lack of understanding by many medical professionals to make the proper diagnosis early on. In many cases, instead of diagnosing a concussion or mTBI, many health care professionals usually overlook the diagnosis and veer to another diagnosis such as post-traumatic headaches, dizziness, anxiety, PTSD, or depression. This leads to an insufficient workup which results in little or no medical documentation of the head injury being entered early on or near its onset. This non-documentation of the head trauma creates a "false medical chart" for the brain injured patient that creates the recipe for later medical and legal mistreatment.
The purpose of this presentation is to present some strategic approaches for the attorney on how to better serve these clients and maximize compensation for them. The suggestions are not intended to be exhaustive and intended to reflect only the views of this author. The goal is to provide some suggestions on what to do if you suspect your client sustain a mild traumatic brain injury.
How to Know Whether You Have a Winning Slip and Fall CaseEdward K. Le
Slip, Trip, and Fall cases are difficult legal cases for any attorneys to take. Here are some factors to know whether you have a viable and winning slip and fall case or not.
Litigating and handling the stairway fall caseEdward K. Le
Stairway falls is one of the most premise liability and common cause of serious injuries and death in the US. However, they are vigorously defended by property owners and landlords. This presentation by a Seattle personal injury attorney is to help attorneys identify the winning stairway fall case.
Common ethical issues in settlement negotiations and mediationsEdward K. Le
The document discusses several hypothetical ethical issues that can arise in settlement negotiations and mediation. It addresses issues such as settling a case without client consent, negotiating with pro se parties, use of puffery and exaggeration in negotiations, complying with onerous client instructions, handling inadvertent disclosures, aggregate settlements, and restrictions in settlement agreements. The document provides analysis of the relevant ethics rules and opinions on each issue to help guide attorneys' conduct.
PRACTICAL STRATEGIES FOR HANDLING A DRAM SHOP CASEEdward K. Le
This document summarizes strategies for handling dram shop liability cases in Washington state. It discusses:
1) Social hosts are generally not liable for injuries caused by intoxicated guests, while commercial establishments can be liable if they serve obviously intoxicated patrons who then cause injuries.
2) Case law established that social hosts are not liable even if they serve alcohol to minors.
3) Commercial establishments may be liable to third parties injured by patrons served while obviously intoxicated, though proving obvious intoxication is difficult without eyewitnesses.
4) More recent cases have lowered the standard of proof from "obviously intoxicated" to "apparently intoxicated," making it easier for plaintiffs to establish commercial establishment liability
Effective use of demonstrative evidence at trialEdward K. Le
The days when an attorney can simply try a case based solely on oral presentation and testimony are gone. With the advent of technology, jurors are now more visual than ever. The negative effect is that their attention span is short and these same jurors are now more impatient than ever. While they may not tell you, these jurors expect trials to be seamless, quick, and entertaining. To hold their attention, the attorney not only has to present seamless testimony, he or she must employ compelling and powerful demonstrative evidence that will educate, inform, and captivate the juror’s attention. That is why the use of compelling and persuasive demonstrative evidence is as important as ever. The point of this paper is to help answer some basic questions to the attorney and his legal team about the use of demonstrative evidence, but also provide ideas and tips on how to create and use demonstrative evidence to persuade jurors. Along the way, another goal is to create and use these demonstrative evidence to increase and enhance the value of your case.
The days when an attorney can simply try a case based solely on oral presentation and testimony are gone. With the advent of technology, jurors are now more visual than ever. The negative effect is that their attention span is short and these same jurors are now more impatient than ever. While they may not tell you, these jurors expect trials to be seamless, quick, and entertaining. To hold their attention, the attorney not only has to present seamless testimony, he or she must employ compelling and powerful demonstrative evidence that will educate, inform, and captivate the juror’s attention. That is why the use of compelling and persuasive demonstrative evidence is as important as ever. The point of this paper is to help answer some basic questions to the attorney and his legal team about the use of demonstrative evidence, but also provide ideas and tips on how to create and use demonstrative evidence to persuade jurors. Along the way, another goal is to create and use these demonstrative evidence to increase and enhance the value of your case.
Common issues in handling a traumatic brain injury caseEdward K. Le
A guide from a Seattle brain injury attorney to the most common issues in how to handle the most common issues with traumatic brain injury cases and post-concussive syndrome. It is also to give the public general facts about brain injury symptoms and rehabilitation.
Trucking crash cases - Handling Trucking CasesEdward K. Le
This document provides information about pursuing justice in trucking crash cases. It discusses how trucking cases differ from car crashes, as the trucking industry has legal teams that respond quickly. It also outlines the distinction between interstate and intrastate trucking, and the different rules and regulations that apply. Tools for litigation are also presented, including manuals, associations, and experts. The document provides tips on identifying parties and preparing thorough discovery.
More Related Content
Similar to How to effectively create and use demonstrative evidence at trial
Chapter 21 - The Investigator and the Legal System1.docxwalterl4
Chapter 21 - The Investigator and the Legal System
1
The decisions investigators must make involve a great deal of discretion.
Investigators must consider what may be termed risk factors.
2
Investigators must consider what may be termed risk factors.
Some police officers and criminal investigators are not fully aware of the order in
3
which a trial is conducted because time often prohibits them from attending a
complete trail from beginning to end. Also, witnesses are often sequestered from
the courtroom before and after giving testimony. This very common practice is used
to minimize the possibility that a witness’s testimony might be affected by other
witnesses’ testimony.
The courtroom process begins with the selection and swearing in of a jury. Jury
selection can last a few hours or a few weeks, depending on the selection process
and the nature of the case. The jury panel from whom the jurors in the trial will
eventually be picked is called a venire.
The steps in the trial process include: direct examination, cross-examination,
redirect examination, re-cross examination, the rebuttal, surrebuttal, and closing
arguments.
Evidence can be defined as anything that tends logically to prove or disprove
a fact at issue in a judicial case or controversy.
4
a fact at issue in a judicial case or controversy.
The rules of evidence are designed primarily to keep a jury from hearing or
seeing improper evidence, and the first rule of evidence is designed to set
parameters on the above definition of evidence.
Proof may be defined as the combination of all those facts—of all the evidence—in
5
determining the guilt or innocence of a person accused of a crime.
The pie chart above illustrates how several different pieces of evidence can
be put together in order to constitute proof of guilt.
6
be put together in order to constitute proof of guilt.
The doctrine of judicial notice is an evidentiary shortcut. Judicial notice is designed
7
to speed up the trial and eliminate the necessity of formally proving the truth of a
particular matter when the truth is not in dispute.
Direct Evidence
8
Direct evidence usually is the testimony of witnesses that ties the defendant
directly to the commission of the crime, such as the testimony of an
eyewitness who can positively state that the defendant committed the crime.
Real Evidence
Sometimes referred to as “physical evidence,” real evidence is connected
with the commission of the crime and can be produced in court.
Demonstrative Evidence
Demonstrative, or illustrative, evidence is not identical to real evidence even
though the items introduced are tangible. It consists of maps, diagrams,
sketches, photographs, tape recordings, videotapes, X-rays, and visual tests
and demonstrations produced to assist witnesses in explaining their
testimony.
Circumstantial Evidence
9
It is a myth that one cannot be convicted of a crime solely o.
The not so secret service rules for the modern the barrister magazineDouglas McPherson
More and more barristers are engaging in client service review programmes but what do they achieve? What will you learn from talking to your clients? And how will that insight benefit Chambers?
This document discusses deception detection and the challenges of determining when someone is lying. It makes three key points:
1) Humans are generally poor at detecting deception, performing only slightly better than chance. We rely on incorrect cues and overestimate our own abilities.
2) While some think looking someone in the eye helps determine lies, research shows liars can control facial expressions better while truth-tellers are less aware, so eye contact reduces accuracy.
3) Asking direct questions about lying, like "are you telling the truth," may increase transparency compared to indirect questions, as it puts more pressure on liars to maintain deception while honest people have natural emotional responses. However, it also risks liars
Communicating With Jurors About Money Seminar Power Pointmccormick
A PowerPoint providing defense counsel with practical advice on how to counter plaintiff’s counsel’s attempts to maximize damage awards by developing the defendant’s own theme, choosing “low” damage jurors and persuasively attacking damages during closing argument.
The document discusses various topics related to witness preparation by lawyers. It notes that witness preparation is not directly regulated and there is little case law or scholarly literature on the topic. While lawyers have a duty to zealously represent clients, they cannot knowingly assist witnesses to testify falsely or commit perjury. The document discusses challenges around distinguishing proper witness preparation from improper coaching. It also discusses techniques used in witness preparation like "the lecture" and debates around simultaneous witness interviews. Overall, the document examines the ethical boundaries and gray areas of lawyers preparing witnesses for testimony or deposition.
Christopher Benvenuto
Collene Walter
What can you expect when you are called upon to act as an expert witness in a matter? This session will help planners prepare for testifying as an expert at depositions, in court, and at quasijudicial
hearings. Common strategies for effective testimony on direct and cross examination, and ways to avoid potential pitfalls will be discussed among other important practical considerations
when testifying as an expert.
1) The document summarizes a panel discussion with Jannie Bester on conclusion terminology and scales used in signature and handwriting examination.
2) Bester uses a 5-scale terminology in their lab: (1) above any reasonable doubt did not write, (2) on a balance of probabilities did not write, (3) inconclusive, (4) on a balance of probabilities did write, (5) above any reasonable doubt did write.
3) Bester believes the 5-scale terminology is the most appropriate as it provides clear conclusions that can be easily understood in a legal context, while other scales cause confusion in judicial proceedings.
Recognize Potential Traumatic Vestibular InjuriesEdward K. Le
Vestibular injuries are common following automobile accidents and falls. However, it is often overlooked by attorneys who fail to recognize it and assist their client to find the appropriate medical specialist. This presentation is to help attorneys identify and recognize a serious medical condition that is often overlooked.
Handling the Dram Shop & Alcohol Overservice CaseEdward K. Le
Litigating and prosecuting the dram shop and alcohol over-service case is notoriously difficult. This presentation discusses practical strategies for the attorney handling such a case.
Litigating and handling the stairway fall caseEdward K. Le
There are many issues that must be dealt with by attorneys who represent clients injured in stairway fall cases. This presentation is a primer on some of the key issues that a lawyer should look for in pursuing liability against the landowner.
Strategies to Maximize Recovery in the Mild Traumatic Brain Injury CaseEdward K. Le
Prosecuting the mild traumatic brain injury (“mTBI”) case is a multi-faceted endeavor. It requires not only understanding the medicine, but also identifying the providers who can give our client the appropriate treatment health providers to ensure their path to recovery. It also requires effectively presenting your client’s case in the most effective manner to obtain the type of compensation that can help them live out a productive and meaningful life after the legal ordeal is over. According to the National Head Injury Foundation, there are approximately two million Americans who will suffer a traumatic brain injury every year. Of this, mild traumatic brain injury accounts for seventy five percent [75%] or more of those brain injuries. Automobile collisions are one of the most common causes of traumatic brain injury. Yet, there are medical research that shows people with mTBI can be left with disabling symptoms that leads to permanent and profound impairments in their life, work, and activities of daily living.
Unfortunately, because the vast majority of victims “appear normal” and are not usually self-aware of their own problems, it is also known as “silent epidemic” according to the Center for Disease Control. Hence, many persons with mild traumatic brain injuries are often victimized due to a lack of understanding by many medical professionals to make the proper diagnosis early on. In many cases, instead of diagnosing a concussion or mTBI, many health care professionals usually overlook the diagnosis and veer to another diagnosis such as post-traumatic headaches, dizziness, anxiety, PTSD, or depression. This leads to an insufficient workup which results in little or no medical documentation of the head injury being entered early on or near its onset. This non-documentation of the head trauma creates a "false medical chart" for the brain injured patient that creates the recipe for later medical and legal mistreatment.
The purpose of this presentation is to present some strategic approaches for the attorney on how to better serve these clients and maximize compensation for them. The suggestions are not intended to be exhaustive and intended to reflect only the views of this author. The goal is to provide some suggestions on what to do if you suspect your client sustain a mild traumatic brain injury.
How to Know Whether You Have a Winning Slip and Fall CaseEdward K. Le
Slip, Trip, and Fall cases are difficult legal cases for any attorneys to take. Here are some factors to know whether you have a viable and winning slip and fall case or not.
Litigating and handling the stairway fall caseEdward K. Le
Stairway falls is one of the most premise liability and common cause of serious injuries and death in the US. However, they are vigorously defended by property owners and landlords. This presentation by a Seattle personal injury attorney is to help attorneys identify the winning stairway fall case.
Common ethical issues in settlement negotiations and mediationsEdward K. Le
The document discusses several hypothetical ethical issues that can arise in settlement negotiations and mediation. It addresses issues such as settling a case without client consent, negotiating with pro se parties, use of puffery and exaggeration in negotiations, complying with onerous client instructions, handling inadvertent disclosures, aggregate settlements, and restrictions in settlement agreements. The document provides analysis of the relevant ethics rules and opinions on each issue to help guide attorneys' conduct.
PRACTICAL STRATEGIES FOR HANDLING A DRAM SHOP CASEEdward K. Le
This document summarizes strategies for handling dram shop liability cases in Washington state. It discusses:
1) Social hosts are generally not liable for injuries caused by intoxicated guests, while commercial establishments can be liable if they serve obviously intoxicated patrons who then cause injuries.
2) Case law established that social hosts are not liable even if they serve alcohol to minors.
3) Commercial establishments may be liable to third parties injured by patrons served while obviously intoxicated, though proving obvious intoxication is difficult without eyewitnesses.
4) More recent cases have lowered the standard of proof from "obviously intoxicated" to "apparently intoxicated," making it easier for plaintiffs to establish commercial establishment liability
Effective use of demonstrative evidence at trialEdward K. Le
The days when an attorney can simply try a case based solely on oral presentation and testimony are gone. With the advent of technology, jurors are now more visual than ever. The negative effect is that their attention span is short and these same jurors are now more impatient than ever. While they may not tell you, these jurors expect trials to be seamless, quick, and entertaining. To hold their attention, the attorney not only has to present seamless testimony, he or she must employ compelling and powerful demonstrative evidence that will educate, inform, and captivate the juror’s attention. That is why the use of compelling and persuasive demonstrative evidence is as important as ever. The point of this paper is to help answer some basic questions to the attorney and his legal team about the use of demonstrative evidence, but also provide ideas and tips on how to create and use demonstrative evidence to persuade jurors. Along the way, another goal is to create and use these demonstrative evidence to increase and enhance the value of your case.
The days when an attorney can simply try a case based solely on oral presentation and testimony are gone. With the advent of technology, jurors are now more visual than ever. The negative effect is that their attention span is short and these same jurors are now more impatient than ever. While they may not tell you, these jurors expect trials to be seamless, quick, and entertaining. To hold their attention, the attorney not only has to present seamless testimony, he or she must employ compelling and powerful demonstrative evidence that will educate, inform, and captivate the juror’s attention. That is why the use of compelling and persuasive demonstrative evidence is as important as ever. The point of this paper is to help answer some basic questions to the attorney and his legal team about the use of demonstrative evidence, but also provide ideas and tips on how to create and use demonstrative evidence to persuade jurors. Along the way, another goal is to create and use these demonstrative evidence to increase and enhance the value of your case.
Common issues in handling a traumatic brain injury caseEdward K. Le
A guide from a Seattle brain injury attorney to the most common issues in how to handle the most common issues with traumatic brain injury cases and post-concussive syndrome. It is also to give the public general facts about brain injury symptoms and rehabilitation.
Trucking crash cases - Handling Trucking CasesEdward K. Le
This document provides information about pursuing justice in trucking crash cases. It discusses how trucking cases differ from car crashes, as the trucking industry has legal teams that respond quickly. It also outlines the distinction between interstate and intrastate trucking, and the different rules and regulations that apply. Tools for litigation are also presented, including manuals, associations, and experts. The document provides tips on identifying parties and preparing thorough discovery.
Evaluating & Handling Premise Liability and Injury CasesEdward K. Le
How to evaluate and handle the premise injury cases, such as slip and falls, trip and falls, stairway fall, construction fall, sidewalk fall, parking lot fall, grocery store fall, and restaurant fall from a personal injury and accident attorney who practices in Seattle, Kent, Auburn, Tukwila, and Bellevue.
How to Find and Use the Medical Literature in a Mild Traumatic Brain Injury CaseEdward K. Le
The effective brain injury lawyer must first learn to understand the medical literature relating to a mild traumatic brain injury before they can effectively represent their client. By doing so, you will not only be a better advocate for your client, but increase the possibility of a fairer resolution for your client. this slideshow is to help you look at some ways to incorporate the use of medical literature into your case in order to be a better advocate for your client.
Abuse and Misuse of the MMPI in Traumatic Brain Injury LitigationEdward K. Le
It is likely that if you ever represent a brain injured client, he or she will likely be compelled to go through psychological neuropsychological testing where the MMPI or the MMPI-2 [the most current version] will be administered. This test is arguably the most frequently used psychological test in America. It is used in employment, criminal, family, and personal injury cases. Tthe frequent problem that you will most encounter as a personal injury practitioner is the extent to which it is misused by the defense and their experts to label your client a malingerer, hypochondriac, or hysterical person without the proper investigation, methodology, or foundation necessary to reach such a conclusion about your client. Hence, it is important that you understand what the MMPI are and what its components consists of in order to effectively represent your client at trial.
How to Make Insurers Pay a Verdict Beyond Their CoverageEdward K. Le
Insurance companies does not pay claims fairly, forcing most injured victims to try cases even in the most straightforward case. Even when a trial verdicts results in a just award for the plaintiff or injured victim, it is difficult to collect directly from the defendant who do not have the assets to pay off the judgment. The only practical solution is to obtain an assignment of claims from the defendant, in exchange for a covenant not to execute, and go after the defendant’s insurers for the excess verdict.
However, unless the correct procedural steps are taken to properly “set up” the insurance company, most insurance companies will balk at paying any funds that are above the third party policy limits of the defendant. The point of these slides is to set forth several suggestions to the plaintiff’s attorney who represents the injured victim to assist them in maximizing the ability to collect on the excess verdict and hold the insurance company accountable. The steps here are based upon Washington law.
10 common myths and misconceptions about traumatic brain injuryEdward K. Le
A guide from a Seattle brain injury attorney to the most common myths and false assumptions about traumatic brain injury and the true facts about post-concussive syndrome. It is to give the public general facts about brain injury symptoms and rehabilitation.
Defending Weapons Offence Charges: Role of Mississauga Criminal Defence LawyersHarpreetSaini48
Discover how Mississauga criminal defence lawyers defend clients facing weapon offence charges with expert legal guidance and courtroom representation.
To know more visit: https://www.saini-law.com/
Genocide in International Criminal Law.pptxMasoudZamani13
Excited to share insights from my recent presentation on genocide! 💡 In light of ongoing debates, it's crucial to delve into the nuances of this grave crime.
Lifting the Corporate Veil. Power Point Presentationseri bangash
"Lifting the Corporate Veil" is a legal concept that refers to the judicial act of disregarding the separate legal personality of a corporation or limited liability company (LLC). Normally, a corporation is considered a legal entity separate from its shareholders or members, meaning that the personal assets of shareholders or members are protected from the liabilities of the corporation. However, there are certain situations where courts may decide to "pierce" or "lift" the corporate veil, holding shareholders or members personally liable for the debts or actions of the corporation.
Here are some common scenarios in which courts might lift the corporate veil:
Fraud or Illegality: If shareholders or members use the corporate structure to perpetrate fraud, evade legal obligations, or engage in illegal activities, courts may disregard the corporate entity and hold those individuals personally liable.
Undercapitalization: If a corporation is formed with insufficient capital to conduct its intended business and meet its foreseeable liabilities, and this lack of capitalization results in harm to creditors or other parties, courts may lift the corporate veil to hold shareholders or members liable.
Failure to Observe Corporate Formalities: Corporations and LLCs are required to observe certain formalities, such as holding regular meetings, maintaining separate financial records, and avoiding commingling of personal and corporate assets. If these formalities are not observed and the corporate structure is used as a mere façade, courts may disregard the corporate entity.
Alter Ego: If there is such a unity of interest and ownership between the corporation and its shareholders or members that the separate personalities of the corporation and the individuals no longer exist, courts may treat the corporation as the alter ego of its owners and hold them personally liable.
Group Enterprises: In some cases, where multiple corporations are closely related or form part of a single economic unit, courts may pierce the corporate veil to achieve equity, particularly if one corporation's actions harm creditors or other stakeholders and the corporate structure is being used to shield culpable parties from liability.
सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने यह भी माना था कि मजिस्ट्रेट का यह कर्तव्य है कि वह सुनिश्चित करे कि अधिकारी पीएमएलए के तहत निर्धारित प्रक्रिया के साथ-साथ संवैधानिक सुरक्षा उपायों का भी उचित रूप से पालन करें।
What are the common challenges faced by women lawyers working in the legal pr...lawyersonia
The legal profession, which has historically been male-dominated, has experienced a significant increase in the number of women entering the field over the past few decades. Despite this progress, women lawyers continue to encounter various challenges as they strive for top positions.
Guide on the use of Artificial Intelligence-based tools by lawyers and law fi...Massimo Talia
This guide aims to provide information on how lawyers will be able to use the opportunities provided by AI tools and how such tools could help the business processes of small firms. Its objective is to provide lawyers with some background to understand what they can and cannot realistically expect from these products. This guide aims to give a reference point for small law practices in the EU
against which they can evaluate those classes of AI applications that are probably the most relevant for them.
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordinary And Special Businesses And Ordinary And Special Resolutions with Companies (Postal Ballot) Regulations, 2018
The Future of Criminal Defense Lawyer in India.pdfveteranlegal
https://veteranlegal.in/defense-lawyer-in-india/ | Criminal defense Lawyer in India has always been a vital aspect of the country's legal system. As defenders of justice, criminal Defense Lawyer play a critical role in ensuring that individuals accused of crimes receive a fair trial and that their constitutional rights are protected. As India evolves socially, economically, and technologically, the role and future of criminal Defense Lawyer are also undergoing significant changes. This comprehensive blog explores the current landscape, challenges, technological advancements, and prospects for criminal Defense Lawyer in India.
This document briefly explains the June compliance calendar 2024 with income tax returns, PF, ESI, and important due dates, forms to be filled out, periods, and who should file them?.
Business law for the students of undergraduate level. The presentation contains the summary of all the chapters under the syllabus of State University, Contract Act, Sale of Goods Act, Negotiable Instrument Act, Partnership Act, Limited Liability Act, Consumer Protection Act.
How to effectively create and use demonstrative evidence at trial
1. P a g e 1 | 13
HOW TO EFFECTIVELY CREATE AND USE PERSUASIVE
DEMONSTRATIVE EVIDENCE AT TRIAL
Edward K. Le, Esq.
Edward K. Le, PLLC
135 Park Ave N.
Renton, Wa 98057
(425) 336-2255
Email: edward@edwardkle.com
www.edwardkle.com
The days when an attorney can simply try a case based solely on oral presentation and
testimony are gone. With the advent of technology, jurors are now more visual than ever. The
negative effect is that their attention span is short and these same jurors are now more
impatient than ever. While they may not tell you, these jurors expect trials to be seamless,
quick, and entertaining. To hold their attention, the attorney not only has to present seamless
testimony, he or she must employ compelling and powerful demonstrative evidence that will
educate, inform, and captivate the juror’s attention. That is why the use of compelling and
persuasive demonstrative evidence is as important as ever. The point of this paper is to help
answer some basic questions to the attorney and his legal team about the use of demonstrative
evidence, but also provide ideas and tips on how to create and use demonstrative evidence to
persuade jurors. Along the way, another goal is to create and use these demonstrative
evidence to increase and enhance the value of your case.
A. WHAT IS DEMONSTRATIVE EVIDENCE?
By its term, demonstrative evidence is any type of evidence that can be used to
demonstrate or illustrate a point, concept, or impression to the jury. It does not have to be
used in a trial setting and you will find it equally useful when preparing a settlement or
mediation memorandum. It can be a picture, a photograph, drawing, illustration, blueprint,
recording, sketch, PowerPoint slide, re-creation, animation, X-ray, MRI, and/or anything that
your mind can conceive to help you and your witness explain an argument or point. Basically,
it is anything that may be displayed or referred to without being formally admitted into
evidence. It is distinguishable from substantive evidence which are admitted into evidence at
trial and taken back into the jury room. That is where the primary difference between
substantive and demonstrative evidence lies: substantive evidence may be submitted and used
by the jury during deliberation, while demonstrative evidence does not. Demonstrative
evidence is further distinguished from real evidence in that it has no probative value itself, but
serves merely as a visual aid to thejury to understand the verbal testimony of the witness.
B. WHY SHOULD YOU USE DEMONSTRATIVE EVIDENCE?
There are many reasons why you, as the attorney or a legal staff member, should use
2. P a g e 2 | 13
demonstrative evidence. Below are the top seven.
First, because jurors expect you to use it. Jurors now live in a society where information
is delivered in a multi-media format. Most of them grew up in an age where information is not
delivered through a talking head, as witnesses will appear to them if they only testify verbally, but
through a content rich format where information is conveyed both orally and visually. In recent
years the “CSI effect” has invaded jury pools and resulted in entertainment-hungry jurors. While
some attorneys may dismiss this effect as unimportant, it is a reality that all trial attorneys must
consider. Without it, the attorney and his legal team are at a significant disadvantage to the
attorney or legal team that does.
Second, because it helps facilitate juror understanding of difficult concepts or points
where a verbal description by itself may be lost. Without a doubt, one of the most important
feature of demonstrative evidence is the ability to explain difficult liability or medical issues
which are difficult to articulate conceptually. Even in minor soft tissue cases, I find that using
a visual illustration that explains the mechanism of injury goes a long way in persuading jurors
to fairly compensate my client. With more complex cases, the use of demonstrative evidence
is almost mandatory. For example, where liability is disputed, having a drawing or a sketch
of the highway where the collision occurred is invaluable in understanding why the defense’s
theory of the case should be rejected. Additionally, in a products liability case, actual images
of the product that injured my client often means the difference between jurors believing my
version of the story or the defense. This is especially true when you, as the attorney or their
assistant, have to explain more complex medical injuries such as cauda equine syndrome,
thoracic outlet syndrome, complex regional pain syndrome, TMJ, or other types of injuries
that are not the garden variety soft-tissue neck and back case. The use of demonstrative and
visual aid in these types of cases often means the difference between a few thousand dollars
or hundreds of thousands of dollars.
Third, because it helps defeat the defense strategy of injecting ambiguity into the case.
As most plaintiff attorneys know, ambiguity is the defense weapon of choice. Ambiguity is
what torpedoes our cases. When jurors do not understand or grasp what we are trying to
prove, research shows they fill the information gap with their own life experiences and mental
shortcuts, which can be adverse to our theory of the case. Therefore, it is imperative that we
help them understand even the most basic issues in our case. For example, I have tried cases
in conservative jurisdictions where even plaintiffs have lost rear end collision cases. Often,
the justification used by these same jurors is that “it was just an accident” and no harm was
intended. In preparing for trial, I would create diagrams and schematics of the collision to
focus not on the collision itself, but on the series of deliberate choices the defendant willfully
ignored that led to the “accident.” I then focus my argument to show through the diagram
how the defendant had choices to make that would have prevented this incident but he/she
deliberately choose to violate those safe choices. I may couple the diagram with a rhetorical
question in closing argument: if someone came into a china shop and break the merchandise,
should they be excused from paying because “it was an accident.” In the same way, if the
defendant broke your client’s enjoyment of good health on a highway instead of a fruit bowl
in a china shop, should they be excused because “it was an accident.”
3. P a g e 3 | 13
Fourth, because it helps increase the value of your case. As any juror will tell you after
a trial, there is often a disconnected between what jurors think testimony meant versus was
said and described by the witness. For example, the invasiveness of a surgical procedure is
sometimes lost during testimony or a medical finding issue. The procedure may be perceived
as relatively minor when in fact, the opposite is true. For example, if your client suffered a
neck injury and went through a cervical fusion, there will be a disconnect in how jurors
perceive the pain and suffering your client experience and what he/she actually suffered
through if all they hear is medical jargons delivered in a scientific manner from the doctor.
But if in addition to the testimony, they are able to see the procedure your client endured, they
will develop a stronger visceral reaction which could justify a bigger verdict. This is what I
call the “wince factor” of a case: the more that jurors are able to viscerally experience and
feel what your client went through after seeing your demonstrative exhibit, the more they will
fairly compensate your client.
Fifth, because it helps jurors retain information better. Modern juryresearch validates
that jurors retain visual information at much a greater rate if verbal and visual information
is concurrently given to them, the same research shows that demonstrative and visual
evidence can help tilt the scale in terms of factual retention. In fact, there are studies which
now shows that jurors retain 75 percent of the information given to them visually. Hence,
if you now ask most lawyers and jury consultants, there simply is not a more effective way
to communicate information than through demonstrative evidence. In fact, psychological
studies suggest that even after 72 hours, most people retain only about 20 percent of what they
see and 10 percent of what they hear. However, their retention rate rises to 75 percent when
they simultaneously hear and see the facts depicted. These figures are especially important
when a trial is expected to last several days or weeks.
Sixth, because it makes you look prepared and competent. Competence promotes
authoritativeness and credibility. As most of you know, trials are all about impressions and
juror engagement. In the vast majority of cases I have tried, it was never the ornery judge
or hostile defense attorney who worries me. It is the juror who yawns or falls asleep during
my case in chief. There is nothing more I dread than that. Yet, interestingly enough, the
majority of attorneys who try cases nowadays still primarily rely on verbal presentation as
their sole means of communication. Unfortunately, most jurors especially the Gen X and
millennial jurors who grew up in the age of social network and media of Youtube, the
internet, and mobile search, their attention span is less than 30 minutes. Ask yourself the
same question: how long would you sit through a newscast that is delivered only from
verbal delivery without any visuals or images before changing the channel? These jurors are
no different and may resent you for wasting their time when they sacrificed their work and
family time to sit on your case.
Seventh and most importantly, because it helps you win your case. Make no
mistake; demonstrative evidence is a powerful tool of persuasion that not only tilt a trial
in your favor, but often can significantly increase the value of your case. I cannot tell you
the number of cases where I was offered very little money which later resulted in a
significant recovery because I was able to simplify a complex liability or damage concept
on a “pin of a head” through a visual exhibit. If you can constantly ask yourself how you
4. P a g e 4 | 13
can visualize an argument, then you will go a long way towards the path of victory.
C. WHAT ARE THE LIMITS ON THE USE OF DEMONSTRATIVE
EVIDENCE?
Whether to allow the use of a demonstrative exhibit is a matter strictly within the trial court's
discretion. Because its purpose is to illustrate testimony, demonstrative evidence is authenticated
by the witness whose testimony is being illustrated. By definition, demonstrative evidence is not
offered for its truth, but rather to illustrate or clarify substantive proof. Consequently, the
foundation necessary for demonstrative evidence is fairly basic. The main foundational elements
necessary for the use of demonstrative evidence are: (a) the demonstrative exhibit relate to a piece
of admissible substantive evidence, (b) the item fairly and accurately reflects the purported proof
for its sue, and (c) the item is deem helpful to the jury. Like substantive evidence, it must fulfill
four criteria of admissibility: 1) relevancy, 2) materiality, 3) competency, and 4) have probative
value that outweighs its prejudicial value. See ER 401, 402, and 403. Hence, as long as the
exhibit has a tendency to make more or less probable the existence of any fact, goes directly to
the purpose of illustration, is understandable and does not mislead, and does not inflame the jury
without having overriding probative value, it is admissible.
In fact, Washington state have generally adopted a liberal rule in allowing the use of
demonstrative evidence at trial. See Spokane v. Patterson, 46 Wash. 93, 94, 89 Pac. 402 (1908)
where the Supreme Court held:
“It is the common practice in the courts to receive private or unofficial maps, diagrams,
models, or sketches for the purpose of giving a representation of objects and places which
generally cannot otherwise be as conveniently shown or described by witnesses, and when
proved to be correct or offered in connection with the testimony of a witness they are
admissible as legitimate aids to the court or jury.”
Consequently, for over 50 years, Washington courts have set forth a policy admitting
demonstrative evidence in a wide range of circumstances. For example, in State v. Tatum, 58
Wn.2d 73, 360 P.2d 754 (1961), our ashington Supreme Court reiterated its long-standing policy
in favor of using demonstrative evidence at trial:
It should be noted that this Court has for many years encouraged the admission and use of
demonstrative evidence, including photographs.
58 Wn.2d at 75.
Indeed, recognizing the technological age in which we live, many Washington courts
have approved of efforts by attorneys to explore imaginative methods of presenting evidence.
For example, in Norris v. State, 46 Wn. App. 822, 733 P.2d 231 (1987), the Washington Court of
Appeals approved of a series of drawings prepared by a professional artist of the scene of an
accident where no photographs were available. Each drawing was identified and authenticated at
trial by witnesses who gave the artist the information. The Court approved of the use of this
evidence in sweeping terms:
5. P a g e 5 | 13
The State's objection seems largely motivated by the novelty of the evidence. Novelty in
an exhibit, however, does not make it inadmissible.
46 Wn. App. at 827.
In simple talk, if it is not misleading, argumentative, quotes hearsay text or testimony,
grosses people out, incite their passion, irrelevant to an issue in the case, or unduly
cumulative, there is no restriction against its use. The general test for admitting demonstrative
evidence is whether it will truly help the jury understand other relevant matters. To make it
admissible to present to the jury, all a witness needs to do is testify that the exhibit fairly and
accurately reflects what the exhibit depicts and that it will help him/her explain a point to the
jury. In fact, its use has been liberally construed by courts for admission.
D. WHAT TYPES OF DEMONSTRATIVE EVIDENCE CAN I USE TO
ENHANCE MY PRESENTATION?
There is no limit to the types of demonstrative exhibits that can be used and created. Below
are some samples and suggestions of demonstrative evidence that you can create and use but by
no means, are intended to be below exhaustive.
1. Photos
Photos are not only the most common demonstrative evidence used at trial, they are likely
the most ubiquitous form of demonstrative evidence. There is truth to the saying, "a picture is
worth a thousand words." I do not recall when I ever try a case, write a mediation memorandum,
or present an arbitration statement without the use of photos. Photos are not only used to
document my client's injuries, but to compare and contrast what the client was like before the injury,
especially if there are scarring or more graphic injuries suchas open wounds, amputated limbs, or broken
bones. In high property damage collisions, photos can be used to establish the severity of the
collision or the impact of force. In addition, I often use photos of the scene of the incident or the
premises to explain the series of events leading to my client’s injuries. For the damage portion
of my case, I also frequently used family photos of my client to humanize them to show the
extent of the harms and losses they suffered by showing activities they used to enjoy versus the
disability and limitations they now experience.
2. Videotapes
Like photos, videos are another category of demonstrative evidence I frequently use.
For example, in a personal injury case, I would obtain a copy of the dash cam video of the
police vehicle to provide the jurors as much sensorial impressions of the scene as possible. If
my client has a family video of him/her showing them being active, I use that to compare and
contrast what they were like before the crash. Further, in more serious injury cases, I would
sometime present a “day in the life” video of my client to depict the client’s limitations and
6. P a g e 6 | 13
impact on his activities of daily living. The video helps provide jurors with insight into what
my client goes through day in and day out so that these same jurors can build empathy or a
connection with my client. Having said that, I think a prudent attorney and his staff should
be careful not to repeat playing the videos too much, or else risk desensitizing the jurors and
losing the emotional impact of the video.
3. Anatomical Models and Illustrations
In personal injury cases, the use of anatomical models and illustration is essential. I can’t
remember ever trying a personal injury case without the use of anatomical models or illustrations.
They assist the doctor or expert to explain a plaintiff's specific injury and to explain difficult
medical concepts that are difficult to articulate otherwise. In fact, jurors have told me afterwards
that the use of such illustration and models was essential to their understanding of the case.
4. Charts
Charts are incredibly useful versatile evidence. They can be used to summarize important
points, summarize past and future special damages, compare and contrasts the testimony and
qualifications of witnesses, and point out key facts essential for the jury to know. They are
particularly useful in opening and closing arguments to organized key testimony in support of the
theory of the case. I also use them to summarize the voluminous information that I intend to
present or have already presented in arguments.
5. Blowupsof Medical Records and Illustration
There is nothing with a greater impact on a jury like using a foam board to highlight
key medical records or an illustration that graphically describe your client’s injuries during
witness presentation so that you can them use over and over during the process of a trial. It
sits in a corner of the courtroom so jurors can see it at all times and psychologically embed it
in their minds. These blow ups not only help you chart your client’s treatment time-line but
also reaffirms to the jury the authenticity of your client’s injuries. In turn, these documents
will create much more impact on the jury and exhibit information that are vital to the case's
support. When the blow up is continually used and kept on display during the testimonies,
it will eventually and psychologically embed in the minds of your jurors, creating a
reinforcing effect that is hard to erase. For this reason, I often have blowups of medical
records in addition to creating Power Point slides during trial.
6. Imaging or Diagnostic Studies
In personal injury cases, jurors often come into trial skeptical of the plaintiff’s injuries.
Hence, if there are imaging studies such as X-rays, MRIs, CT-Scan, SPECT/PET scan, ultrasound
studies, or EMG studies that are supportive of your client’s injuries, you should incorporate it into
a poster board or PowerPoint slide to objectify your client’s injuries. They not only help armed
your favorable jurors to argue on your behalf during jury deliberation but also convert hesitant
7. P a g e 7 | 13
jurors who may have been on the fence about supporting your case. Indeed, anytime there is
objective evidence that can support your case, you should continually refer to it during trial.
Further, because most hospitals, radiological, and diagnostic centers now provide these imaging
or diagnostic studies in electronic format, it is not difficult to obtain and put them into a PowerPoint
slide or to blow them up on a poster board which can then be used during opening, closing, or
witness testimony. In my opinion, putting them on poster board and leaving it inside the courtroom
where jurors can continually observe the exhibit will further reinforce the fact that you have
objective evidence to support your case.
7. Timelines
Timelines are essential tools to both educate the jury about critical issues in your case as
well as create favorable impressions about the nature of your case. In trials, I often use timelines
to highlight the length and consistency of my client’s treatment to rebut the defendant’s claim that
he/she is malingering or that there was a pre-existing condition. The timeline help emphasize the
continuity of care the client received and to compare/contrast the familiarity my client’s treating
doctors developed over time with my client versus that of the defense examiner. They also help
me argue projected need for future medical care and future earning capacity loss by showing the
need for continuing care and the continuation of his/her time away from work.
Additionally, in products liability and premise liability cases, I use timelines to highlight
the number of other similar incidents that have occurred with the product or on the premises by
showing these events on the timeline. Because jurors often respond negatively to the defendant
who had notice of other similar incidents but chose to take little or no action towards prevention,
the timeline often prove critical to swaying jurors to the plaintiff side of the case even in these
traditionally tough liability cases.
In medical malpractice cases, I use a timeline to underscore the errors or omissions that
were committed by the hospital or health providers leading to the event. Because jurors are much
more lenient to the medical defendants in these type of cases, I use the timeline to overcome a
higher psychological barrier of proof that these jurors often require in their mind. Hence, I use the
timeline to demonstrate that the misconduct committed to my client was not a one-time
error/omission or event, but rather a systematic pattern of misconduct that resulted from a series
of errors and misconduct to help overcome the psychological resistance from these jurors.
8. Summary of Injuries
In many personal injury cases, the client suffers not just a single but multiple injuries. To
emphasize the seriousness of their medical condition, a summary of injuries listing all of the
injuries on one page highlights the extent of the client’s disability and limitations. The summary
can be used in conjunction with the expert or with the client to underscore what they have suffered
and gone through. With experts, the compounding effects of medical comorbidity can be
explained using the chart as to why each site of injury lengthens the process of recovery for another
injury. For example, if your client suffers chronic pain and develops depression resulting in
cognitive deficits, the medical literature supports that the length of his or her injury will be
compounded. Hence, by showing all of the listed injuries on one chart will allow your doctor to
8. P a g e 8 | 13
present a compelling argument regarding why your client needs future medical care or why he/she
cannot return to work sooner. Additionally, you can use the summary during closing argument to
justify a higher request for general damages.
9. Storyboards
Storyboards are series of hand-drawn still images with written details about the action
and content below each image. In cases where the facts are complex and confusing, storyboards
are used to explain the story of a case in a coherent manner without losing the powerful and
persuasive effects of storytelling. For example, in a motor vehicle crash case, the storyboard can be
used to show the sequence of an event and the series of wrong choices the defendant made leading
to the crash. This is a much compelling technique than just verbally describing the incident because
it allows jurors to be immersed in the story and feel like theyare a participant rather than an observer.
In fact, I prefer storyboards over computer animation, which are much more expensive to create
and more difficult to fix whenever a judge sustain an objection against its use. In these
instances, I use storyboards to ensure that thekey events in my case are covered and focus the
jurors’ attention at the same time.
10. Recreation and Reenactment
In products and premise liability cases, I find that a simple recreation or reenactment of
an event often is the most persuasive evidence in the case. I would engage my engineer, human
factors expert, ergonomist, or safety expert reenact the event that my client described on video to
illustrate how the incident occurred and then recreate another video to show how the incident could
have been prevented with a better design, more regular repairs, or adopting a simple fix. For
example, I recently represented several clients in separate cases who sued their landlord after
falling down the stairways at their apartment complex. In most instances, these cases are tough
because jurors usually and viscerally blame the plaintiff for not “watching where they are going”
or for ignoring an open and obvious condition that they knew or should have known.” However,
by showing a reenactment of how the fall occurred with a recreation of what safety features could
have been employed by the landlord to prevent the fall, I was able to present a compelling argument
that even if the tenants lived on the premises for years, they could not possibly know the hazards
posed by the stairways until the time they needed it the most: the actual moment of their fall.
Hence, if you can reenact an incident and compare it to what could have been done to make it
safer, you have a powerful arsenal to help you convince jurors about your theory of the case.
11. Computer Animation
Of all the demonstrative evidence available, computer animations is by far the most
expensive to create. It is also the most recent to be adopted for use in the courtroom. Outside
of actual reenactments, animation is arguably the best form of evidence to allow the jury to see
firsthand what occur in an accident, event, or medical procedure. Because it is dynamic
versus static evidence like a document, use of animation captivates and holds jury attention
the best. Hence, if you ever worry about boring or complicated facts in your case, your case
may justify the use of animation to visually and sensorially engage your jurors and sway them
9. P a g e 9 | 13
to your theory of the case. Jurors who only listen to an oral presentation oftentimes will
create their own differing versions of the process or event. However, with animation, all
thejurors see arethe exact same event atthe sametime and to some degree become witnesses
themselves to the actual event or incident. They are not just audience members, but part of
the scene as they see the process step by step. However, you should be forewarn that computer
generated animation can be extremely expensive, so you must carefully weigh the benefit of
its use. For example, an animation of a single process can cost from a few thousand to tens
of thousands of dollars.
E. WHERE CAN I GO TO CREATE DEMONSTRATIVE EVIDENCE?
Creating and using demonstrative evidence requires planning and imagination. However,
it does not require a hefty budget. What it does require is a deep reflection on the practical realities
of your case and a careful consideration of what the value of the case is. However, through careful
planning and thought, you can certainly create persuasive and compelling demonstrative evidence
not only that can be done on a shoestring budget, but to be recycled for future use. Below are a
number of considerations on how you can create demonstrative evidence. However, they are not
intended to be exhaustive and with some ingenuity, you will find that some of the best
demonstrative evidence are simple everyday objects that you can use.
First, you can hire an expert to create a custom made exhibit. Unless the case justifies it, I
don’t particularly recommend this route because it is the most expensive. However, there are
occasions where the most persuasive demonstrative evidence are the ones that are custom made.
With custom exhibits, you will need to connect your expert with illustrators and animators who in
turn, work together to create a custom made exhibit that is specifically tailored to address the
particular issues of your my case. You should then seek a pre-trial ruling before its use so that if
there are any changes the judge feels warranted, you can have your illustrator or animator make
such modifications before presenting it at trial.
Second, if your budget does not justify hiring an illustrator or animator, you may find it
particularly useful to just purchase recycle stock illustrations and animation. There is no shortage
of online medical illustration and animation companies who are willing to sell recycled work
product or stock samples of their work at a fraction of the original work. Outfits such as
medicalexhibits.com, medivisuals.com, gettyimages.com, scientificanimations.com provide stock
medical illustrations and videos that are friendly on the budget but can give you powerful exhibits
that address the particular issues in your case. Another equally viable option is purchasing
software to create your own timeline. For example, since the time I purchased TimeMap software,
I have created well over hundreds of timelines which I have incorporated into my settlement
demands, mediation memorandums, arbitration materials, and trial exhibits. For as little as $300,
the software has given me immeasurable returns through the years.
Third, if buying stock illustrations and videos still stretches beyond your budget, there is
still the friendly internet and search engine that always provide free materials. In fact, I now make
it a frequent practice to first see if I can first find materials on Google, Google images, Flickr,
YouTube, and other website first before I consider hiring an expert illustrator or animator. For the
10. P a g e 10 | 13
most part, these web portals and search engines provide over 90% of my trial demonstrative
materials. I send my doctor or expert the link, like a YouTube animation video or a Google image,
and have my doctor or expert determine whether the material fairly and accurately depict what it
purports to be. I then ask these experts whether using such exhibit will aid them in explaining
their testimony before a jury. Without exception, these doctors and experts are always appreciative
that they have multimedia materials that can aid them to explain their testimony. Additionally, I
have sometimes connected my IPad or computer to the Web to load a YouTube video or image in
order to play it before a jury. I don’t just use them for trial. I frequently use YouTube and Google
images routinely now even in my own practice with my own clients to help my client better
understand their medical conditions and issues. In some occasions, I have used YouTube and
Google images to help my clients prepare for their defense medical examination. Indeed, versus
other big law firms with huge trial budgets, the Web has been a great equalizer in my practice to
preparing my clients and experts for trials.
Fourth, join a WSAJ listserv and ask to borrow the exhibit. As many of you already know,
the WASJ listserv is a great resource for many small firms and solo practitioners. It is likely that
many of the demonstrative exhibit that you are seeking probably has already been created,
purchased, or prepared by a fellow colleague who may be willing to share it with you. In fact, I
myself have been asked by many colleagues who are preparing to try their first case to share my
PowerPoint slides, anatomical models, animation videos, and even audio/video equipment with
them. Unless we are in trial, I usually have no hesitation in loaning out these materials so it does
not hurt to ask us.
Fifth, create it yourself. If you can learn how to use PowerPoint to incorporate images and
videos into your presentation, you yourself can create memorable demonstrative exhibits to use at
trial. For example, because our firm conducts our own video deposition, I find it much easier to
take snippets out of deposition videos that I can incorporate into my PowerPoint presentation at
trial, especially during openings, closings, or cross-examinations of an adverse witness. In these
instances, jurors have told me that being able to see the witness’ demeanor and body language
versus just hearing their testimony made a huge impression on how they perceive that witness.
F. WHAT TYPE OF OBJECTIONS SHOULD I ANTICIPATE FROM OPPOSING
COUNSEL?
You cannot create and use demonstrative evidence without first anticipating what type of
objections your opposing counsel will make. In fact, it is both prudent and economical to know
what type of objections your opponent will raise before you waste your time with creating an
expensive or time consuming exhibits. As I indicated in section C, there are a few restrictions that
you should know beforehand on the use of demonstrative evidence so that you tailor your exhibit
to avoid these objections.
First, ask: is the exhibit relevant to what I or my witness are trying to prove? If so, is its
probative value substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice? A potential problem
with certain demonstrative evidence, such as videos, in-court demonstrations or computer
generated animation, is that the jury may be unfairly prejudiced by such a graphic representation
11. P a g e 11 | 13
of an event. For example, if you intend to use graphic images of your client’s injury, make sure to
have a legal memorandum written in advance to support the use of such images to maximize your
ability to use it.
Second, ask: does it mislead the jury in any way? Does it have texts which are
argumentative? Most judges, while liberally admitting the use of images, will conversely
refuse to allow the use of texts or sounds which serves to as substituted argument to the jury.
Hence, it is important if you show an image or a video, that no texts or sounds be included.
Third, ask: is the exhibit cumulative, necessary, or cause undue delay? One of the
great problem of preparing for trial is that we create and use too many exhibits as we can to
support our case. This can be seen as overkill by the judge. Hence, before using the exhibit,
ask ourselves whether there is another exhibit that may be more effective. Remember that
demonstrative evidence, is, by its very nature, a demonstration of evidence, not a repeat of
evidence. In addition to choosing your exhibits and visual aids carefully, resist the urge to use
all the available exhibits to support your case.
Finally, a word of advice. A common objection or tactic I have encounter from the
defense is that the demonstrative evidence was not disclose in discovery. Do not fall for
this objection. The civil rules does not require a party to disclose demonstrative exhibits
until they are created. Since most demonstrative exhibits are prepared either a few weeks
or just weeks before trial, argue that you do not have a duty to produce something that has
yet been created until its completion. Having said that, I would urge you to share your
demonstrative exhibits with your opponent and defense counsel as early as practicable or
seek an agreement on its use. At the very least, you will know what the objection is in
advance to rebut it or to preemptively file a Motion to Pre-admit the demonstrative
evidence.
G. ARE THERE ANY ADDITIONAL TIPS CAN YOU PROVIDE ABOUT USING
DEMONSTRATIVE EVIDENCE
Yes. The following list below are based upon years of my own trial and error using
demonstrative evidence.
First, determine what point you are trying to make. Just because you can use it does not
mean you should use it. In fact, you should never use demonstrative exhibits just for the sake of
doing it. There is always a danger that it may be use by your opponent to support his/her case.
Hence, before using the exhibit, first make sure that the point or concept are you trying to illustrate
is accurately reflected in the exhibit. If your exhibit is vague or confusing, your opponent may
figure out a way to use your exhibit against you.
Second, pay attention to the details. Jurors will pay attention to the smallest details and
any mistake will reflect badly on your credibility or at worse, will be seen as a deliberate attempt
to mislead. Hence, make sure that you carefully scrutinize the exhibit before actually showing it
to the jurors. I learned this lesson the hard way years ago during a trial. My theory in that case
12. P a g e 12 | 13
was that a round metal rod in the cushion of a seat caused my client’s thoracic spine to fracture.
However, before trial, I could not find a round metal rod that was similar in dimension so I
substituted it with a rectangular rod that did have similar in dimension, even if not in shape.
Despite pointing out this only difference during my direct examination, several jurors later told
me they thought I was trying to mislead them. Although this did not prove fatal to my case, I learn
that if I ever offered any demonstrative exhibit again, it would have to be accurately similar in
detail to the object I was trying to demonstrate.
Third, make sure you show it to your expert and get their agreement to use the exhibit at
trial. The last thing you want to do is surprise your expert and have them use an exhibit that you
created for them at trial. One, they may not agree with your exhibit. Two, he/she may point out a
tiny inaccuracy which gives fodder for the defense to argue against its use. Three, the exhibit may
not support the concept they are trying to convey. Either way, your credibility and that of your
case will be diminished before these jurors. Hence, it is a good idea to always sit down with your
expert and ask them if the exhibit you created would be helpful for them to use. It is possible they
may direct you to a better exhibit or one they are more comfortable with.
Fourth, make sure that the exhibit is not argumentative or testimonial in any way. Judges
usually allow non-argumentative demonstrative exhibits for the purpose of assisting the jury.
However, if a demonstrative exhibit is argumentative or in any way testimonial, it will likely not
be allowed.
Fifth, make sure to disclose it to your opponent before using it. This will assure that there
are no interruptions when you present it. Ask them if they have any objections. If so, bring it up
to the Court for approval. At the very least, you will know in advance whether or not you will be
able to use it during your presentation.
Sixth, ask your staff, friends, and family to provide input and feedback about your
demonstrative exhibit. For example, after you created an illustration, reenactment, image, or
video, ask your colleague, friend, or family member what they think of it. Does it help you prove
a point that you are trying to make? The reaction you receive will be invaluable. This will allow
you to know whether judges or jurors will react favorably to your exhibit or not. Further, it will
allow you to make necessary modifications if you discover that your exhibit has a tendency to
create confusion or misunderstanding. Also, your colleague, friend, or family may help show you
a better concept or way to improve the clarity and persuasive power of the exhibit.
Seventh, always have a backup plan by making sure your exhibit can be easily and quickly
modified. For example, if a judge sustain an objection to the wording or labels on your exhibits,
you need to be able to make changes quickly to comport with the rulings. Hence, if the exhibit is
stored on a computer, you can make the necessary changes and generate a new exhibit.
Additionally, it is always a good practice to keep texts, labels, and other notations on your exhibit
to a minimum, not only to increase its admissibility, but also to give your witness the opportunity
to provide a more detailed explanations and contemporaneously enhance his/her credibility or
authority in front of jurors.
13. P a g e 13 | 13
Eighth, make sure your exhibits can be clearly seen by all jurors. The whole point of using
demonstrative exhibits is so that they can persuade jurors or the viewer. However, if the exhibits
cannot be clearly seen by the jurors, this would be a futile effort. Hence, make sure that the image,
video, chart, or diagram is large enough to be seen. If there are labels and notations, make sure
that the font and letter size is large enough to be read.
Ninth, keep it simple. Do not make your demonstrative exhibit too complicated. Often
demonstrative exhibits designed by experts or “exhibit professionals” suffer from too much detail.
Remember that you are trying the case to a jury of lay persons, and that it is your job to simplify
the point or concept that you are trying to make.
Tenth, if you intend to play a video, reenact an event, or use PowerPoint slides, make sure
to rehearse using the demonstrative evidence before presenting it. It is always a danger to play a
PowerPoint or reenact an event for the first time in front of the jury. An exhibit that is supposed
to tell the jury “x”, but does “y” will be devastating to your case. Hence, you will need to play it
beforehand. If something can go wrong with an exhibit in the courtroom, assume that it will. The
more time that passes while you and your team are trying to figure what is wrong with your exhibit,
the more damage that will be done to your case and credibility.
Finally, make it interesting and entertaining. If it is not interesting, it may lose juror interest.
Worse, it will fail to hold the juror’s retention of the key points you are trying to make. For
example, do not use bullet points in PowerPoint slides. They are boring and distract from the
jurors’ ability to listen to what you have to say. If your slide cannot capture the jurors’ attention
immediately upon showing, it will be cognitively discarded in the juror’s mind. Hence, show the
exhibit to your colleague, friends, and family for their input about the interest or educational value
of an exhibit before using it.
H. CONCLUSION
Make no doubt about it. Demonstrative evidence is important. I can either help you
win your case and it can help increase the value of your case. In the majority of the time, you
will find that the value and advantages of using it substantially outweigh the risks of not using
it. This paper is intended to offer you some insight on how to use demonstrative evidence
effectively at trial. However, you may find that the tips and advice given may also aid you at
preparing effective settlement demands, mediation memorandums, and arbitration prehearing
statements as well. I encourage you to use this paper not as an end, but as a starting point.
Along the way, if you find more creative or helpful ideas, I welcome you to share it with us so
that we may all improve our collective advocacy skills and serve our clients the best that we
can.