This document discusses important historical and current trends in the U.S. healthcare system that have led to demands for change. It outlines how healthcare costs have risen unsustainably over time, with total expenditures increasing from $73 billion in 1970 to $2.5 trillion in 2009. Specific programs like Medicare and Medicaid have also seen dramatic cost increases. Attempts to control costs through managed care plans were initially successful but failed to adequately address quality and patient satisfaction issues over the long run. The reforms in the Affordable Care Act aim to address longstanding problems around coverage, costs, and quality.
Acs0008 Health Care Economics The Broader Contextmedbookonline
1) US healthcare spending is very high at over $2 trillion annually, yet health outcomes are mixed compared to other developed nations.
2) There is debate around whether rising healthcare costs represent an economic risk, with some arguing costs crowd out other spending while others say spending is acceptable if the value of health is high.
3) A key factor driving higher US costs with no clear improvement in outcomes is the market-based healthcare system, which differs from other countries. Features of healthcare markets like supplier-induced demand and moral hazard may contribute to rising costs.
The document discusses the problems with the current US healthcare system, including the large number of uninsured and underinsured Americans, high costs, and lower quality of care compared to other developed nations. It argues for a universal single-payer healthcare system that would provide comprehensive coverage to all Americans with no out-of-pocket costs, funded through taxes and savings from reduced administrative overhead. A single-payer system could save over $200 billion per year currently spent on private health insurance bureaucracy and lower drug and care costs through collective bargaining.
This document discusses medical tourism, which is defined as traveling from one country to another for medical treatment. It notes that estimates of the number of US patients traveling abroad for care vary widely, from 60,000-85,000 per year according to one study to over 750,000 according to another. Several factors are driving growth in medical tourism, including rapidly rising healthcare costs in the US, a decrease in the percentage of Americans with health insurance, and significantly lower costs for care abroad. If US health plans covered medical travel, one study estimated the number of outbound medical tourists could grow to 500,000-700,000 patients annually.
HEA 409 - Expensive U.S. Health Care - DESALVAJulie DeSalva
The document analyzes reasons why U.S. healthcare is so expensive. It asserts the major factors are a lack of consumer understanding about costs, a system that incentivizes performing many services, and pricing of expensive treatments and equipment. Consumers do not understand hospital billing practices and prices, or declining out-of-pocket costs, leading them to overuse services. Providers are incentivized to perform more procedures to increase payments. Expensive equipment can be quickly paid off through additional billing, and drugs and devices face few price restraints. These factors have made healthcare costs increasingly unaffordable.
This document provides an executive summary of health care trends in the United States. It discusses factors contributing to recent declines in health care cost growth such as the economic recession and provisions of the Affordable Care Act. While millions have gained insurance through provisions of the ACA, nearly half of U.S. adults still lacked adequate health insurance in 2012. The effects of major ACA provisions going into effect need continued monitoring to ensure near universal coverage is achieved. Health care spending growth has remained stable in recent years but concerns remain about rising costs impairing deficit reduction goals.
Physician Expectations and Primary Care Shortages: Evidence from the Affordab...Gerrit Lensink
This paper is the first installment in my undergraduate thesis on physician expectations and their effect on primary care shortages in the United States. Over following semesters I will be strengthening my research with econometric models and further analysis. Updates will follow as completed.
The Cost & Impact of Massive Complexity in the US Health Insurance MarketRuss Kuhn
This document discusses the complexity of the US health insurance system and the potential impacts of an upcoming Supreme Court ruling on the Affordable Care Act. It notes that the US system is already very complex and expensive, with high costs preventing many from getting needed care. The ACA increased access to insurance but also added complexity. A Supreme Court case this month could end ACA subsidies for 8 million people, significantly increasing their costs overnight. Regardless of the ruling, the system will remain difficult for most consumers to navigate, with many making poor insurance choices without adequate understanding of options.
Acs0008 Health Care Economics The Broader Contextmedbookonline
1) US healthcare spending is very high at over $2 trillion annually, yet health outcomes are mixed compared to other developed nations.
2) There is debate around whether rising healthcare costs represent an economic risk, with some arguing costs crowd out other spending while others say spending is acceptable if the value of health is high.
3) A key factor driving higher US costs with no clear improvement in outcomes is the market-based healthcare system, which differs from other countries. Features of healthcare markets like supplier-induced demand and moral hazard may contribute to rising costs.
The document discusses the problems with the current US healthcare system, including the large number of uninsured and underinsured Americans, high costs, and lower quality of care compared to other developed nations. It argues for a universal single-payer healthcare system that would provide comprehensive coverage to all Americans with no out-of-pocket costs, funded through taxes and savings from reduced administrative overhead. A single-payer system could save over $200 billion per year currently spent on private health insurance bureaucracy and lower drug and care costs through collective bargaining.
This document discusses medical tourism, which is defined as traveling from one country to another for medical treatment. It notes that estimates of the number of US patients traveling abroad for care vary widely, from 60,000-85,000 per year according to one study to over 750,000 according to another. Several factors are driving growth in medical tourism, including rapidly rising healthcare costs in the US, a decrease in the percentage of Americans with health insurance, and significantly lower costs for care abroad. If US health plans covered medical travel, one study estimated the number of outbound medical tourists could grow to 500,000-700,000 patients annually.
HEA 409 - Expensive U.S. Health Care - DESALVAJulie DeSalva
The document analyzes reasons why U.S. healthcare is so expensive. It asserts the major factors are a lack of consumer understanding about costs, a system that incentivizes performing many services, and pricing of expensive treatments and equipment. Consumers do not understand hospital billing practices and prices, or declining out-of-pocket costs, leading them to overuse services. Providers are incentivized to perform more procedures to increase payments. Expensive equipment can be quickly paid off through additional billing, and drugs and devices face few price restraints. These factors have made healthcare costs increasingly unaffordable.
This document provides an executive summary of health care trends in the United States. It discusses factors contributing to recent declines in health care cost growth such as the economic recession and provisions of the Affordable Care Act. While millions have gained insurance through provisions of the ACA, nearly half of U.S. adults still lacked adequate health insurance in 2012. The effects of major ACA provisions going into effect need continued monitoring to ensure near universal coverage is achieved. Health care spending growth has remained stable in recent years but concerns remain about rising costs impairing deficit reduction goals.
Physician Expectations and Primary Care Shortages: Evidence from the Affordab...Gerrit Lensink
This paper is the first installment in my undergraduate thesis on physician expectations and their effect on primary care shortages in the United States. Over following semesters I will be strengthening my research with econometric models and further analysis. Updates will follow as completed.
The Cost & Impact of Massive Complexity in the US Health Insurance MarketRuss Kuhn
This document discusses the complexity of the US health insurance system and the potential impacts of an upcoming Supreme Court ruling on the Affordable Care Act. It notes that the US system is already very complex and expensive, with high costs preventing many from getting needed care. The ACA increased access to insurance but also added complexity. A Supreme Court case this month could end ACA subsidies for 8 million people, significantly increasing their costs overnight. Regardless of the ruling, the system will remain difficult for most consumers to navigate, with many making poor insurance choices without adequate understanding of options.
Dual eligibles, who qualify for both Medicare and Medicaid, make up different percentages of total Medicare populations across states, ranging from 11% in Montana to 37% in Maine. Individuals can qualify for Medicaid through various pathways including Supplemental Security Income (SSI), medically needy coverage, and Medicare Savings Programs. States with higher percentages of dual eligibles tend to have higher poverty rates and Medicaid programs that cover individuals with higher incomes. The Affordable Care Act aims to improve care coordination and lower costs for this vulnerable population through the Federal Coordinated Health Care Office.
Deaths from fall-related traumatic brain injuries are on the rise in U.S.Δρ. Γιώργος K. Κασάπης
Deaths due to traumatic brain injuries from falls have risen in recent years, according to new CDC data. Here's more:
•Overall trends: From 2008-2017, the number of TBI-related deaths from falls increased 17%, leading to more than 17,400 such deaths in 2017.
•Demographics: In 2017, the rate of such deaths was highest in males and in people aged 75 and older. In fact, the death rate in this age group was eight times more than for those 55-74.
•Implications: Given the study's findings, and the aging population in the U.S., health care providers ought to educate the elderly and their families about the risk of falls, the report authors conclude.
Policy experts Brian Blase and Rea S. Hederman, Jr. discuss why health insurance premiums will rise under Obamacare. Among the reasons are: minimized youth discounts, mandated benefits, and no cost-sharing for preventive services.
Mercer Capital's Value Focus: Healthcare Facilities | Year-End 2017Mercer Capital
Mercer Capital's Healthcare Facilities Industry newsletter provides perspective on valuation issues. Each newsletter also includes macroeconomic trends, industry trends, and guideline public company metrics.
This study examines the impact of lifestyle behaviors on Medicare costs at the state level using panel data from 2003 to 2010. The key findings are:
1) Reversible health-related lifestyle attributes like smoking and obesity are statistically significant determinants of variations in state-level Medicare costs.
2) State-level Medicare spending is elastic with respect to changes in the prevalence of smoking and obesity.
3) To account for unobserved state-specific factors, the study fits both fixed-effects and random-effects regression models and uses the Hausman test to identify the most efficient estimator.
Healthcare 2.0 - The State of Healthcare, Trends and Future DevelopmentsNick van Terheyden
The document discusses current problems in healthcare including physician burnout and challenges delivering high quality care due to complexity and workload. It also discusses trends in healthcare including use of electronic health records, healthcare reform, and social networking. Finally, it discusses potential future directions for healthcare including improved data sharing between patients and providers through technologies like medical record banking and patient communities.
The World’s Health Care Crisis: From the Laboratory Bench to the Patient’s Be...Elsevier
Ibis Sánchez-Serrano, founder and CEO of The Core Model Corp., a corporate strategy and policy think tank, talks about the role of pharma in the World’s Health Care Crisis at the New York Public Library on Aug. 29, 2013. He says the major problem is lack of access to better, safer and more affordable medicines. This issue is present not only in the United States and the developing world but also in countries with socialized health care systems. This illustrated talk will provide a comparative analysis of healthcare systems throughout the world and address major issues within biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries.
This document discusses several factors contributing to the high cost of healthcare in the United States, with a focus on prescription drug pricing. It notes that spending on prescription drugs has risen rapidly in recent decades and that pharmaceutical companies have high profit margins. Other key drivers of rising healthcare costs mentioned include chronic diseases like diabetes, spending on hospital services and medications to treat diseases, and health risk behaviors. The document also examines proposals to lower drug costs and the debate around pharmaceutical industry practices like drug price increases, marketing spending, mergers and acquisitions, and shareholder profits.
Intensive Care for Medicaid McQ Quarterly 2005Craig Tanio
This document summarizes a McKinsey report analyzing the unsustainable growth of Medicaid costs in the United States. It finds that by 2009, Medicaid will consume more than 75% of new state revenue in some states and 25-50% in many others. While opportunities exist to capture savings, actually doing so will require difficult decisions and creative leadership given political and structural challenges. Reform is needed to put Medicaid on a more stable long-term footing while still serving those in need.
A single-payer healthcare system would cause further inefficiencies and be an economic burden for the United States. While increasing access to care, a single-payer system would lead to longer wait times like in Canada where 27% of people wait over 4 months for procedures compared to only 5% in the US. It would also decrease quality of care as seen in Canada where doctors are overworked and underpaid. Implementing such a system would require a tax increase of over 150% which would cripple the US economy, as seen when Vermont explored a single-payer plan. Competition in healthcare markets leads to lower costs and higher quality unlike a single-payer system, making it a step backwards for US healthcare.
Whose to blame for high prescription drug costs?Richard Meyer
Pharma certainly can take the blame for high drug prices but the reality is that even if prescription drugs were free our healthcare costs would still be climbing
1) The document discusses new estimates from the American Community Survey that show an increase in uninsured children in Minnesota from 2008 to 2009, making Minnesota one of two states to see a rise.
2) It analyzes characteristics of uninsured children such as race, poverty level, and geographic location within Minnesota. Key findings include higher uninsurance among those with at least one full-time worker or with only a high school education.
3) The document concludes the ACS is a new tool for evaluating health insurance coverage at sub-state levels and that Minnesota is falling in state rankings for children's coverage.
This document discusses churning (involuntary movement between health insurance programs) under the Affordable Care Act. It aims to identify the characteristics of individuals likely to churn between Medicaid and Qualified Health Plans (QHPs), and the health plans best able to serve churning populations. The document introduces different types of health plans and examines their presence in several states' insurance exchanges. It outlines how churning will occur under the ACA and analyzes the experiences of Hawaii, New York, and Maryland to identify policies that can reduce churning, such as market alignment of insurers and strong data tools. The key findings are that market alignment dramatically reduces churning problems, data-driven health plans can help states address churning
Non-Emergency Medical Transportation and the Promise of Blockchain ApplicationsMaria Yaremenko
This article discusses non-emergency medical transportation (NEMT) services in the United States and how blockchain technology could help address issues with the current system. It notes that public programs like Medicaid and Medicare spend over $2.7 billion annually on NEMT to help vulnerable groups access healthcare. However, studies have found inefficiencies and missed appointments due to varying delivery methods between states. The article suggests blockchain could increase transparency and efficiency, reducing an estimated 15-20% of Medicaid spending that is lost to fraud and waste. This could yield over $100 million in program savings while also improving health outcomes.
Presentation to Kentucky Association of Health UnderwritersGalen Institute
The document discusses the impacts and future of the Affordable Care Act, including that it will increase health care costs, many will lose their current health insurance plans, and there is widespread pushback against the law from doctors, employers, and states who argue it will have negative economic consequences. The document also outlines ongoing legal and political challenges to the law.
This document discusses the growth potential of the medical breakthrough products sector over the next several decades. It cites increasing global healthcare expenditures, driven by expanding middle classes and aging populations, as macro trends supporting growth. It also notes industry trends like the rising percentage of drug revenues from breakthrough products and increasing understanding of human biology that will lead to new treatment and cure opportunities. Regulatory improvements may also help accelerate development and availability of medical breakthroughs. The document concludes that innovation in breakthrough products has the potential to dramatically disrupt healthcare and create new successful companies.
Latest nationwide health report shows i.a. some improvements in infant mortalityΔρ. Γιώργος K. Κασάπης
The latest national health report is out from the CDC. Here’s what you need to know:
•Infant mortality: Overall, the infant mortality rate in 2017 was 14% lower than in 2007. At the same time, the rate was 170% higher among black infants than infants born to Asian or Pacific Islander mothers.
•Use of cigarettes: Although the number of high schoolers who used tobacco cigarettes decreased between 2011-2018, the use of e-cigarettes increased by nearly 20%.
•Prescription drugs: The proportion of Americans taking five or more prescription drugs nearly doubled between 1999-2016. In 2017, some 12% of adults who were 100%-200% below the federal poverty level reported not getting prescribed medicines due to cost.
The document discusses challenges and opportunities for applying operations research (O.R.) principles to healthcare systems in emerging countries. It outlines several key issues facing healthcare delivery in these countries, including growing wealth and health disparities between urban and rural areas, increasing rates of non-communicable diseases, lack of health insurance coverage for most populations, and antiquated infrastructure. It then provides examples of how O.R. has been applied to healthcare projects in some low-income countries to improve monitoring, evaluation and resource allocation. Finally, it proposes a roadmap for applying O.R. in emerging country healthcare, focusing on improving access to medical supplies and products, hospital/clinic efficiency, disease prevention programs, public health emergencies, health
Chapter 2Where Are WeAmerican health care is in a state of flJinElias52
Chapter 2
Where Are We?
American health care is in a state of flux as new scientific knowledge and clinical experience continue to change our definitions of illness and wellness. As a society, we respond by changing the ways health care is delivered. Health services increasingly impact our society—from health status to employment to budgetary economics to recreation to professional concerns to our perceptions of our own well-being.
American health care is also in flux because now that it has grown to more than one-sixth of our economy it threatens to squeeze out public goods such as education and infrastructure maintenance. People have wanted to do something about cost and access to care problems for a long time. The 2010 Affordable Care Act (ACA) is doing much to address access issues, but opposition to certain provisions is strong. Employers are steadily shifting more risk to employees and their families, and there is a real tension between Washington and the state capitols over Medicaid expansion. Medicare trust funds are forecast to disappear over the next decade or so. Washington is unlikely to tolerate another major health reform battle, although major changes may come as a side effect of a “grand” government overhaul of spending and tax policies. The future is highly uncertain, and still we must plan and act as we go along.
This chapter reviews the current status of the U.S. health care system from several points of view:
• Current outcomes and costs
• Quality
• Leadership
• Complexity
• Industrializing structures for delivery
• Medicalization of our society
• Redistribution of wealth
2.1 Current Outcomes and Costs
Previous section
Next section
2.1 CURRENT OUTCOMES AND COSTS
Health care expenditures were projected to rise to close to 20% of the U.S. gross domestic product (GDP) by 2015 (Borger et al., 2006), but more recent estimates from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) project it to be 18.2% for 2015 and 19.5% by 2021 (CMS, 2012). Average annual family health insurance premiums were estimated for 2012 at $15,745, with $11,429 paid by employers. The 4% growth rate for 2012 was slow by historical standards but still more than twice the growth rate of wage income. The comparable total insurance cost for a single individual was $5,615. Large employers (98%) offered health care benefits to workers but were cutting back on retiree health benefits. Only 50% of firms with 3 to 9 workers and 73% with 10 to 24 workers offered health benefits. Many small companies do not provide health benefits. At the same time, control of health care by health professionals is being threatened by outsiders calling for more reliance on government programs, more consumer-centered care, or both.
High Comparative Costs and Low Comparative Outcomes
The United States spends far more on health care per capita and as a percentage of GDP than other developed countries, yet does not seem to be much better off for it. Table 2-1 illustrates this ...
Efforts to lower health care spending in the US are hampered by an aging population and rise in chronic diseases. Chronic illnesses like cancer, diabetes and heart disease account for 75% of health care costs and treating them over a lifetime leads to increasing costs. While the Affordable Care Act aims to expand access and incentivize quality, Republicans oppose it and offer alternatives focused on free markets. The future of health reform depends on the 2016 presidential election, as Democrats generally support the ACA while Republicans seek to repeal it.
Dual eligibles, who qualify for both Medicare and Medicaid, make up different percentages of total Medicare populations across states, ranging from 11% in Montana to 37% in Maine. Individuals can qualify for Medicaid through various pathways including Supplemental Security Income (SSI), medically needy coverage, and Medicare Savings Programs. States with higher percentages of dual eligibles tend to have higher poverty rates and Medicaid programs that cover individuals with higher incomes. The Affordable Care Act aims to improve care coordination and lower costs for this vulnerable population through the Federal Coordinated Health Care Office.
Deaths from fall-related traumatic brain injuries are on the rise in U.S.Δρ. Γιώργος K. Κασάπης
Deaths due to traumatic brain injuries from falls have risen in recent years, according to new CDC data. Here's more:
•Overall trends: From 2008-2017, the number of TBI-related deaths from falls increased 17%, leading to more than 17,400 such deaths in 2017.
•Demographics: In 2017, the rate of such deaths was highest in males and in people aged 75 and older. In fact, the death rate in this age group was eight times more than for those 55-74.
•Implications: Given the study's findings, and the aging population in the U.S., health care providers ought to educate the elderly and their families about the risk of falls, the report authors conclude.
Policy experts Brian Blase and Rea S. Hederman, Jr. discuss why health insurance premiums will rise under Obamacare. Among the reasons are: minimized youth discounts, mandated benefits, and no cost-sharing for preventive services.
Mercer Capital's Value Focus: Healthcare Facilities | Year-End 2017Mercer Capital
Mercer Capital's Healthcare Facilities Industry newsletter provides perspective on valuation issues. Each newsletter also includes macroeconomic trends, industry trends, and guideline public company metrics.
This study examines the impact of lifestyle behaviors on Medicare costs at the state level using panel data from 2003 to 2010. The key findings are:
1) Reversible health-related lifestyle attributes like smoking and obesity are statistically significant determinants of variations in state-level Medicare costs.
2) State-level Medicare spending is elastic with respect to changes in the prevalence of smoking and obesity.
3) To account for unobserved state-specific factors, the study fits both fixed-effects and random-effects regression models and uses the Hausman test to identify the most efficient estimator.
Healthcare 2.0 - The State of Healthcare, Trends and Future DevelopmentsNick van Terheyden
The document discusses current problems in healthcare including physician burnout and challenges delivering high quality care due to complexity and workload. It also discusses trends in healthcare including use of electronic health records, healthcare reform, and social networking. Finally, it discusses potential future directions for healthcare including improved data sharing between patients and providers through technologies like medical record banking and patient communities.
The World’s Health Care Crisis: From the Laboratory Bench to the Patient’s Be...Elsevier
Ibis Sánchez-Serrano, founder and CEO of The Core Model Corp., a corporate strategy and policy think tank, talks about the role of pharma in the World’s Health Care Crisis at the New York Public Library on Aug. 29, 2013. He says the major problem is lack of access to better, safer and more affordable medicines. This issue is present not only in the United States and the developing world but also in countries with socialized health care systems. This illustrated talk will provide a comparative analysis of healthcare systems throughout the world and address major issues within biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries.
This document discusses several factors contributing to the high cost of healthcare in the United States, with a focus on prescription drug pricing. It notes that spending on prescription drugs has risen rapidly in recent decades and that pharmaceutical companies have high profit margins. Other key drivers of rising healthcare costs mentioned include chronic diseases like diabetes, spending on hospital services and medications to treat diseases, and health risk behaviors. The document also examines proposals to lower drug costs and the debate around pharmaceutical industry practices like drug price increases, marketing spending, mergers and acquisitions, and shareholder profits.
Intensive Care for Medicaid McQ Quarterly 2005Craig Tanio
This document summarizes a McKinsey report analyzing the unsustainable growth of Medicaid costs in the United States. It finds that by 2009, Medicaid will consume more than 75% of new state revenue in some states and 25-50% in many others. While opportunities exist to capture savings, actually doing so will require difficult decisions and creative leadership given political and structural challenges. Reform is needed to put Medicaid on a more stable long-term footing while still serving those in need.
A single-payer healthcare system would cause further inefficiencies and be an economic burden for the United States. While increasing access to care, a single-payer system would lead to longer wait times like in Canada where 27% of people wait over 4 months for procedures compared to only 5% in the US. It would also decrease quality of care as seen in Canada where doctors are overworked and underpaid. Implementing such a system would require a tax increase of over 150% which would cripple the US economy, as seen when Vermont explored a single-payer plan. Competition in healthcare markets leads to lower costs and higher quality unlike a single-payer system, making it a step backwards for US healthcare.
Whose to blame for high prescription drug costs?Richard Meyer
Pharma certainly can take the blame for high drug prices but the reality is that even if prescription drugs were free our healthcare costs would still be climbing
1) The document discusses new estimates from the American Community Survey that show an increase in uninsured children in Minnesota from 2008 to 2009, making Minnesota one of two states to see a rise.
2) It analyzes characteristics of uninsured children such as race, poverty level, and geographic location within Minnesota. Key findings include higher uninsurance among those with at least one full-time worker or with only a high school education.
3) The document concludes the ACS is a new tool for evaluating health insurance coverage at sub-state levels and that Minnesota is falling in state rankings for children's coverage.
This document discusses churning (involuntary movement between health insurance programs) under the Affordable Care Act. It aims to identify the characteristics of individuals likely to churn between Medicaid and Qualified Health Plans (QHPs), and the health plans best able to serve churning populations. The document introduces different types of health plans and examines their presence in several states' insurance exchanges. It outlines how churning will occur under the ACA and analyzes the experiences of Hawaii, New York, and Maryland to identify policies that can reduce churning, such as market alignment of insurers and strong data tools. The key findings are that market alignment dramatically reduces churning problems, data-driven health plans can help states address churning
Non-Emergency Medical Transportation and the Promise of Blockchain ApplicationsMaria Yaremenko
This article discusses non-emergency medical transportation (NEMT) services in the United States and how blockchain technology could help address issues with the current system. It notes that public programs like Medicaid and Medicare spend over $2.7 billion annually on NEMT to help vulnerable groups access healthcare. However, studies have found inefficiencies and missed appointments due to varying delivery methods between states. The article suggests blockchain could increase transparency and efficiency, reducing an estimated 15-20% of Medicaid spending that is lost to fraud and waste. This could yield over $100 million in program savings while also improving health outcomes.
Presentation to Kentucky Association of Health UnderwritersGalen Institute
The document discusses the impacts and future of the Affordable Care Act, including that it will increase health care costs, many will lose their current health insurance plans, and there is widespread pushback against the law from doctors, employers, and states who argue it will have negative economic consequences. The document also outlines ongoing legal and political challenges to the law.
This document discusses the growth potential of the medical breakthrough products sector over the next several decades. It cites increasing global healthcare expenditures, driven by expanding middle classes and aging populations, as macro trends supporting growth. It also notes industry trends like the rising percentage of drug revenues from breakthrough products and increasing understanding of human biology that will lead to new treatment and cure opportunities. Regulatory improvements may also help accelerate development and availability of medical breakthroughs. The document concludes that innovation in breakthrough products has the potential to dramatically disrupt healthcare and create new successful companies.
Latest nationwide health report shows i.a. some improvements in infant mortalityΔρ. Γιώργος K. Κασάπης
The latest national health report is out from the CDC. Here’s what you need to know:
•Infant mortality: Overall, the infant mortality rate in 2017 was 14% lower than in 2007. At the same time, the rate was 170% higher among black infants than infants born to Asian or Pacific Islander mothers.
•Use of cigarettes: Although the number of high schoolers who used tobacco cigarettes decreased between 2011-2018, the use of e-cigarettes increased by nearly 20%.
•Prescription drugs: The proportion of Americans taking five or more prescription drugs nearly doubled between 1999-2016. In 2017, some 12% of adults who were 100%-200% below the federal poverty level reported not getting prescribed medicines due to cost.
The document discusses challenges and opportunities for applying operations research (O.R.) principles to healthcare systems in emerging countries. It outlines several key issues facing healthcare delivery in these countries, including growing wealth and health disparities between urban and rural areas, increasing rates of non-communicable diseases, lack of health insurance coverage for most populations, and antiquated infrastructure. It then provides examples of how O.R. has been applied to healthcare projects in some low-income countries to improve monitoring, evaluation and resource allocation. Finally, it proposes a roadmap for applying O.R. in emerging country healthcare, focusing on improving access to medical supplies and products, hospital/clinic efficiency, disease prevention programs, public health emergencies, health
Chapter 2Where Are WeAmerican health care is in a state of flJinElias52
Chapter 2
Where Are We?
American health care is in a state of flux as new scientific knowledge and clinical experience continue to change our definitions of illness and wellness. As a society, we respond by changing the ways health care is delivered. Health services increasingly impact our society—from health status to employment to budgetary economics to recreation to professional concerns to our perceptions of our own well-being.
American health care is also in flux because now that it has grown to more than one-sixth of our economy it threatens to squeeze out public goods such as education and infrastructure maintenance. People have wanted to do something about cost and access to care problems for a long time. The 2010 Affordable Care Act (ACA) is doing much to address access issues, but opposition to certain provisions is strong. Employers are steadily shifting more risk to employees and their families, and there is a real tension between Washington and the state capitols over Medicaid expansion. Medicare trust funds are forecast to disappear over the next decade or so. Washington is unlikely to tolerate another major health reform battle, although major changes may come as a side effect of a “grand” government overhaul of spending and tax policies. The future is highly uncertain, and still we must plan and act as we go along.
This chapter reviews the current status of the U.S. health care system from several points of view:
• Current outcomes and costs
• Quality
• Leadership
• Complexity
• Industrializing structures for delivery
• Medicalization of our society
• Redistribution of wealth
2.1 Current Outcomes and Costs
Previous section
Next section
2.1 CURRENT OUTCOMES AND COSTS
Health care expenditures were projected to rise to close to 20% of the U.S. gross domestic product (GDP) by 2015 (Borger et al., 2006), but more recent estimates from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) project it to be 18.2% for 2015 and 19.5% by 2021 (CMS, 2012). Average annual family health insurance premiums were estimated for 2012 at $15,745, with $11,429 paid by employers. The 4% growth rate for 2012 was slow by historical standards but still more than twice the growth rate of wage income. The comparable total insurance cost for a single individual was $5,615. Large employers (98%) offered health care benefits to workers but were cutting back on retiree health benefits. Only 50% of firms with 3 to 9 workers and 73% with 10 to 24 workers offered health benefits. Many small companies do not provide health benefits. At the same time, control of health care by health professionals is being threatened by outsiders calling for more reliance on government programs, more consumer-centered care, or both.
High Comparative Costs and Low Comparative Outcomes
The United States spends far more on health care per capita and as a percentage of GDP than other developed countries, yet does not seem to be much better off for it. Table 2-1 illustrates this ...
Efforts to lower health care spending in the US are hampered by an aging population and rise in chronic diseases. Chronic illnesses like cancer, diabetes and heart disease account for 75% of health care costs and treating them over a lifetime leads to increasing costs. While the Affordable Care Act aims to expand access and incentivize quality, Republicans oppose it and offer alternatives focused on free markets. The future of health reform depends on the 2016 presidential election, as Democrats generally support the ACA while Republicans seek to repeal it.
The document discusses Medicare spending in the United States. It reports that Medicare spending was reduced to 0.2% in 2013 compared to 1.8% between 2009-2012. This decrease may have resulted from the recession limiting spending, delivery system reforms to improve quality while reducing local costs, or a focus on patient-centered care. Statistical data from Medicare budget reports is cited to support the claims around reduced spending.
Healthcare oligopoly is Affecting u.s. economy convertedRoyJMeidinger
The document provides an overview of rising healthcare costs and declining outcomes in the United States compared to other developed nations. It notes that while the US spends much more per capita on healthcare, it has lower life expectancy and rates of preventable deaths than peers. The high costs are driven by administrative waste, high prices, and lack of cost control. The document argues that healthcare costs are a major burden on the US economy and individuals, and that reforms are needed to reduce costs while improving access and outcomes for all Americans.
Assessing U.S. and International Experience with Health Reform and Implications for the Future by W. David Helms, Ph.D, President and CEO, Academy Health
https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2018.1444267
COMMENTARY
The opportunity cost of pharmaceutical price increases:
improving health by investing in education
Jonathan E. Fieldinga, Frederick J. Zimmermana and Kristin Calsadab
aCenter for Health advancement, Department of Health Policy & Management, Fielding School of Public Health,
uCla, los angeles, Ca, uSa; bDepartment of Health Policy & Management, Fielding School of Public Health, uCla,
los angeles, Ca, uSa
ABSTRACT
A federal law prohibits the US Government from negotiating pharmaceutical
prices. This law comes with an opportunity cost: resources spent on
unnecessarily highly priced drugs cannot be spent on other social goals. To
calculate the opportunity cost of this spending, this analysis first identified
a proxy for unnecessarily high pharmaceutical spending. We then estimated
the value of the outcomes which this money would produce if invested in an
alternative, high-value use. We estimated the excess price increases in a set
of 80 commonly prescribed drugs paid for by the Centers for Medicare and
Medicaid Services from 2010 to 2014. The value of price increases among
these drugs above the rate of medical inflation was $11.5 billion dollars. This
money has alternative uses, including some that promote health and other
social goals. This is the opportunity cost of unnecessarily high pharmaceutical
spending. Investment in high-school dropout prevention programs was
chosen as a measure of alternative uses for this spending because of the
importance of education as a social determinant of health and because
medical spending has been shown to specifically crowd out education
spending. Invested in programs to increase high-school graduation rates,
this money could create an additional 200,000 high-school graduates, which
in turn would generate an estimated $32 billion in returns (net present value)
to government and health improvements of up to 1 million quality-adjusted
life years (QALYs) per year of redirected expenditures.
Introduction
In 2014, medical care-related expenditures in the United States accounted for 17.8% of gross domestic
product (GDP), totaling over $3 trillion (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, 2015b). Yet despite
outspending all other countries on a per capita basis, the United States ranks in the bottom third of
non-poor countries in life expectancy at birth and 27th out of 34 in life expectancy at age 60, ahead
only of far less wealthy countries like Mexico, Turkey, and Hungary (Scobie, 2015).
A report from the Institute of Medicine (Young & Olsen, 2010) documented $425 billion in excessive
costs-per-service delivered in 2009, including $130 billion in inefficiently delivered services, $190 billion
in excessive administrative costs, and $105 billion in prices that are too high. Although the report breaks
out inefficiency and administrative costs from prices, it should be remembered that all of these factors
increase the ave ...
Health care policy in the United States, Canada and ChinaYuzhou Sun
This document compares the health care systems of the United States, Canada, and China. It finds that while the US spends the most on health care as a percentage of GDP, it has a lower life expectancy than Canada. China spends the least but has increased funding for reform. Key factors discussed include pharmaceutical costs, administration costs, income levels, the uninsured population, lifestyle/obesity rates, and recent reforms in the US and China. Excessive medical treatment and fraud are also noted as increasing costs without improving health outcomes.
The document discusses key issues with the American healthcare system by analyzing three important exhibits. Exhibit 2 shows that while the US scores well on health outcomes, it performs poorly on access and efficiency compared to other countries. Exhibit 3 illustrates how the US spends nearly twice as much on healthcare than other nations without better quality. Exhibit 13 highlights the problem of nearly 47 million uninsured Americans lacking access to healthcare. Overall, the exhibits show the US healthcare system struggles with access, costs, and quality despite high spending, indicating managerial issues more than financial constraints.
Health care spending in the US is increasing and is projected to continue rising due to factors such as an aging population and increased prevalence of chronic diseases. The US currently spends over $2.8 trillion annually on health care, with 75% of that amount going towards treatment of chronic illnesses like cancer, diabetes, and heart disease. As baby boomers age, the population over 65 is growing rapidly and will account for 20% of the US population by 2030. Most elderly individuals have multiple chronic conditions, driving up costs. Chronic disease treatment is also more expensive than acute care since it requires long-term management. Increased spending on the top three chronic diseases alone is estimated to reach $846 billion. Policy solutions aim to better manage chronic
Required Resources week 6Required TextLovett-Scott, M., & Pra.docxsodhi3
Required Resources week 6
Required Text
Lovett-Scott, M., & Prather, F. (2014). Global health systems: Comparing strategies for delivering health services. Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
· Chapter 15: Prevalence and Management of Behavioral Health Care
· Chapter 16: Comparative Health Systems
· Chapter 17: Conclusions and Future Leadership
Articles
Baumol, W., & Blinder, A. (1999). Economics: Principles and policy (8th ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Dryden Press.
Collins, T. (2003). Globalization, global health, and access to healthcare. International Journal of Health Planning and Management, 18, 97–104.
Flesner, M. K. (2004). Care of the elderly as a global nursing issue. Nursing Administration Quarterly, 28(1), 67-72.
Getzen, T. E. (2004). Health care economics: Fundamentals and flow of funds (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.
Lee, R. (2003). The demographic transition: Three centuries of fundamental change. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17(4), 167-190.
Medicare Rights Center. (2011). The history of Medicare and the current debate (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.. Retrieved from http://www.medicarerights.org/
Strunk, B., Ginsburg, P., & Banker, M. (2006). The effect of population aging on future hospital demand. Health Affairs, 25(3), 141-149. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.25.w141
World Health Organization. (2011). Globalization (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/trade/glossary/story043/en/index.html
Recommended Resources
Textbook PowerPoint Presentations
Lovett-Scott, M., & Prather, F. (2014). Chapter 15: Prevalence and Management of Behavioral Health Care. Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Lovett-Scott, M., & Prather, F. (2014). Chapter 16: Comparative Health Systems. Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Lovett-Scott, M., & Prather, F. (2014). Chapter 17: Conclusions and Future Leadership. Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Week Six Standard Guidance
The globalization of health services has moved to the forefront of national political discussions. According to the World Health Organization (2011):
Increased interconnectedness and interdependence of people and countries, is generally understood to include two interrelated elements: the opening of borders to increasingly fast flows of goods, services, finance, people, and ideas across the international borders and the changes in institutional and policy regimes at the international and national levels that facilitate or promote such flows (para. 1).
Balancing the increasing cost of quality health care and access for a country’s population has given rise to economic measurement of inputs and outputs to determine actual cost of health delivery. An aging population in countries around the globe adds to the growing list of health trends that have taxed health systems around the world.
Global healthcare systems today are growing at an unsustainable rate, while consumers on a worldw ...
The United States spends more on healthcare than any other country but has poor health outcomes. Money influences the healthcare system in several ways. The system is fragmented with different providers and payers not sharing information, leading to duplicate tests and costs. A fee-for-service payment model incentivizes providers to see more patients and perform more procedures to increase payments. Lobbying by the pharmaceutical and insurance industries shapes healthcare policies and regulations in ways that prioritize profits over public health. Transforming how care is delivered, such as emphasizing prevention and plant-based diets, could reduce costs and improve health.
Healthcare causal essay sample from assignmentsupport.com essay writing ser...https://writeessayuk.com/
The document discusses challenges facing the US healthcare system as life expectancy increases and the population ages. Advancements in medicine have led to unprecedented growth in the elderly population. This will strain Medicare and increase demands for healthcare services, home care, and healthcare workers. It will also drive up overall healthcare expenditures. To support the growing elderly population, the government should promote education in health fields and encourage careers in geriatric, primary, and preventative care.
Will Healthcare Improve the US Economy in the Coming Years?anthonycasimano
With a double-digit growth rate, the healthcare industry is poised to improve the US economy. Also, looking at the current trend of growth, it does not seem like this is going to stop anytime soon. Healthcare has shown a healthy growth over the last decade between 2000 and 2010. Interestingly, healthcare employment grew by 25% while the employment rate dropped by more than 2% in the same period.
This document discusses health care reform in the United States. It provides background on universal health care systems originating in Germany and Britain in the late 19th/early 20th centuries. It then discusses the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act passed in 2010 in the US, which aimed to expand health insurance coverage. The document notes criticisms of both the German and US healthcare systems. It argues the German system distributes care fairly through government involvement, unlike the US approach of developing mass assistance programs and stating government should not control them.
Respond to at least two classmates who identified different areas of.docxpeggyd2
Respond to at least two classmates who identified different areas of disparity than your own. Do you agree or disagree with their assessment of the impact of economic policy on the disparity? Does the disparity discussed have a microeconomic or a macroeconomic impact on health care?
Post # 1
Trina Cox
Disparity in healthcare can be defined as, “differences between groups in health insurance coverage, access to and use of care, and quality of care” (Orger & Artiga, 2018). There are various healthcare disparities; however, the key areas of disparity I have chosen to identify and analyze include health insurance coverage, quality of care, and gender. As most people already know, health insurance is a type of insurance coverage that is designed to cover an insured person’s medical expenses (such as hospital, doctor, laboratory and pharmacy services). Although the number of uninsured Americans have decreased drastically since the passing of ACA, disparities in this area still exist. Some individuals’ annual incomes still are not enough to pay the low premiums that may be required of them to have access to health insurance coverage.
Quality of care can be described as, “the degree to which health care services for individuals and populations increase the likelihood of desired health outcomes and are consistent with current professional knowledge” (AHRQ, 2017). Although it is an unethical act displayed by healthcare professionals; in some areas, all patients are not treated equally with regards to quality of care. According to Dr. Ananya Mandal (2019), discrimination occurs when healthcare providers treat individuals from certain population groups differently to other population groups, whether this is done consciously or not. It is common for this to occur when providers have stereotyped impressions of specific racial or ethnic groups.
Gender can play a major role in healthcare disparities among women, specifically, in some of the developed countries. Researchers have reported that determinants of gender differences, like welfare indicators (e.g., education and income), behavioral factors (e.g., smoking and drinking), and social factors (e.g., social support and socioeconomic status) have direct correlations with some of the existing disparities (Hassanzadeh, et al, 2017). Afghanistan is a country that still has a high rate of gender disparities among women, even though some improvements have occurred. In this country, the biggest disparities that I feel still exist are between women in rural versus urban areas, and those with some education, as opposed to those women with none; showing that as education of women increases, so does their health and that of their children because of the education and resources that they have.
I think several economic policies have impacted these disparities and they include differences in income levels, education, and geographic location. A person’s annual income may have a direct effect on his or her ability.
MMS State of the State Conference: Susan Dentzer - Rationalizing Health Spend...Frank Fortin
The document discusses challenges facing Massachusetts and the US in controlling rising healthcare costs. It notes that current spending growth rates threaten Massachusetts' reforms and the nation's fiscal health. Several key drivers of higher spending are identified, including new medical technologies, chronic diseases like obesity, and low productivity growth in the healthcare sector. Solutions proposed include reducing unnecessary variations in supply-sensitive care, payment reforms like bundled payments that incentivize quality over quantity, and policies to improve prevention and management of chronic conditions.
Essay about Health Care Reform
Healthcare reform Essay
Health Care Reform Essay
Health Care Reform Essay
Health Care Reform Essay
Essay On Health Care Reform
The On Health Care Reform
Health Care Reform
Healthcare in the United States Essay
Essay Health Care Reform
Similar to HMG 6110 Final Term Paper Important Historical and Current Trends in Health Care that have Led to the Demands for Change (20)
LDR 7980 Capstone Essay Four Assignment Ethics and LeadershipArdavan Shahroodi
This document provides an analysis of ethics and leadership in organizations. It discusses how the modern organization structure can deprive employees of engagement needed for ethical development. Researchers found unethical decisions often stem from pressure from managers and lack of support from executives. The document recommends leaders develop strong value systems, avoid oversimplifying problems, be objective in evaluations, and seek diverse perspectives to make ethical decisions. Cultivating an authentic culture of engagement between leaders and followers is key to sustainable ethics.
LDR 7980 Capstone Essay Three Assignment Influencing Motivating and Leading t...Ardavan Shahroodi
The document discusses influencing, motivating, and leading knowledge workers. It defines knowledge workers as highly educated employees who contribute through specialized knowledge rather than manual labor. While knowledge workers are increasingly seen as the main source of competitive advantage, organizations struggle to measure their value and understand how to empower them. The document argues that knowledge workers respond best to leadership that inspires trust, clarifies purpose, aligns systems to support goals, and unleashes talent through individual support and setting an example. An effective performance review system focuses on skills development rather than decisions about pay. Overall, organizations must transition to a new model that recognizes all employees, including so-called unskilled workers, as potential knowledge workers in order to fully benefit from their human
There are several reasons why women are underrepresented in elite leadership roles. First, women's family responsibilities often force them to leave their careers voluntarily, and it can be difficult to return or regain their previous status. Additionally, women are less likely than men to promote themselves for leadership positions due to gender biases and social pressures. Finally, prevalent gender stereotypes associate women with communal rather than agentic leadership traits, resulting in prejudice that views women as less qualified than men for elite roles.
LDR 6135 Paper One Case Analysis of Values in Tension ArticleArdavan Shahroodi
The document summarizes the key points of the article "Values in Tension: Ethics Away from Home" by Thomas Donaldson. It discusses two approaches to dealing with ethical dilemmas abroad - cultural relativism and ethical imperialism. However, Donaldson proposes following three core principles instead: respect for core human values, respect for local traditions, and understanding that context matters. He provides examples of core human values like human dignity, basic rights, and good citizenship. The document also discusses how companies can establish codes of conduct and reward ethical behavior to operate ethically abroad while respecting different cultures.
LDR 6135 Student Research Paper Corporate Social ResponsibilityArdavan Shahroodi
This document provides an overview of corporate social responsibility (CSR) including definitions, theories, and arguments for and against CSR. It discusses how there is no universally agreed upon definition of CSR and presents definitions from various sources. It also summarizes different theoretical approaches that categorize theories of CSR as well as arguments made by prominent thinkers like Milton Friedman that the sole responsibility of businesses is to maximize profits for shareholders. The document provides a concise yet comprehensive introduction to the topic of CSR.
HRM 6045 Research Paper Why Change Efforts Fail Within OrganizationsArdavan Shahroodi
1) The document discusses Kotter's 8-step model for leading organizational change and why change efforts often fail. It analyzes each step in Kotter's model, using examples from PepsiCo's diversity strategy.
2) Establishing urgency, creating a guiding coalition, developing a vision and communicating the vision are some of the critical early steps. Failures at these stages are common reasons for change efforts to falter.
3) Effective communication is key - it must go beyond a single meeting and involve multiple opportunities to disseminate information through words and visible leadership support of the new vision.
How the vision of the founder can impact culture years after the company is f...Ardavan Shahroodi
The founder's vision can impact an organization's culture years later through six primary embedding mechanisms: (1) what leaders pay systematic attention to, (2) how they react to crises, (3) their visible behaviors, (4) how they allocate rewards and status, (5) who they hire and promote, and (6) how they deal with disagreements. These messages become embedded through six secondary articulation and reinforcement mechanisms over time: organizational design, structure, rituals, physical space, stories, and formal statements. In mature organizations, the secondary mechanisms act to reinforce and maintain the founder's assumptions even as new leaders take over.
Best Practices in Creating and Using Employee Survey Feedback Data as a Means...Ardavan Shahroodi
This document summarizes best practices for using employee survey feedback to improve retention and engagement. It discusses how competently designed surveys can provide valuable insight into organizational dynamics. Surveys should focus on questions that are essential to understanding how employees feel about their workplace. Proper design includes involving cross-functional teams, learning from past surveys, and communicating frequently with stakeholders before, during and after the survey process. The document also provides examples of how companies like Heinz and Astellas Pharma have successfully used survey data to implement policies to attract top talent and create dynamic work environments.
This document discusses developing effective mentoring programs in organizations. It defines mentoring as an extended relationship where a more experienced mentor transfers knowledge to a less experienced mentee. Effective programs improve employee engagement, productivity, diversity and retention. The document outlines steps to create a program, including assessing organizational goals, selecting mentors and mentees, matching pairs, and providing training and feedback. It emphasizes the voluntary nature and emphasizes allowing all, especially underrepresented groups, to participate. Programs should be measured through surveys and comparing metrics of participants versus non-participants.
The document discusses trends in the use of employee self-service technology in human resources. It describes how self-service systems have evolved from mainframe computers that automated basic HR functions to modern web-based and mobile platforms that allow employees to independently access and update their personal information, benefits, training records, and other employment-related data. The document also examines how social networking and dashboard technologies have expanded the scope of self-service HR to include communication, engagement, and strategic workforce analytics. While self-service systems provide benefits to both employees and employers, the document notes they also present risks like security breaches and legal liabilities that companies must mitigate through clear policies and procedures.
Intern Anti-Discrimination and Fair Labor Standards Act Training Overview HRM...Ardavan Shahroodi
This document provides an overview and training on anti-discrimination laws and the Fair Labor Standards Act for interns at A New Day, Inc. It discusses key principles from an employment law course including sustainability, responsibility, respect, fairness and compassion. It then summarizes laws prohibiting discrimination based on age, disability, equal pay, genetic information, and national origin. The document emphasizes complying with both the letter and spirit of anti-discrimination laws to avoid litigation and protect employees.
Anti-Discrimination Laws In United States and United KingdomArdavan Shahroodi
The document provides an overview and comparison of anti-discrimination laws in the United States and United Kingdom. It notes that while the US was earlier to enact substantive anti-discrimination legislation, the UK has narrowed this gap in recent years through laws like the 2010 Equality Act. Both countries rely on anti-discrimination statutes and agencies to address unequal treatment in employment, though class action lawsuits remain rare in the UK. The document also analyzes differences in the conceptual approaches taken by the two countries, such as the UK referring to disparate treatment as "direct discrimination" rather than using that term.
An Opinion on the U. S. Supreme Court Decision on the Affordable Care ActArdavan Shahroodi
The document provides an analysis of the U.S. Supreme Court decision on the Affordable Care Act. It argues that the Court's ruling was well-reasoned and respected the Constitution. The Court found that while Congress cannot mandate commerce, it can impose a tax penalty for not having health insurance. Additionally, the Court found that Congress cannot coerce states into expanding Medicaid by threatening to take away existing Medicaid funds. Overall, the author argues the Court interpreted the Constitution moderately and maintained its credibility despite political controversy surrounding the ACA.
Elements of the Health Care Eco-Sytem that Pose as Barriers to Care Week 5 Wr...Ardavan Shahroodi
This document discusses several barriers to healthcare access in the United States. It first examines the lack of health insurance, noting that around 17% of Americans were uninsured in 2009. Other barriers discussed include the type of insurance coverage (HMOs had better outcomes than fee-for-service or Medicaid), out-of-pocket costs deterring necessary care, Medicaid providing inadequate access and quality of care due to low reimbursement rates, and racial disparities resulting in worse treatment and outcomes for non-white groups. The Affordable Care Act aims to reduce many of these barriers through expanding insurance coverage and improving Medicaid.
Historical factors that have influenced health care, Health ManagementArdavan Shahroodi
The document discusses five historical factors that have influenced how healthcare is delivered in the US: 1) The authority of the medical profession in organizing care, 2) Viewing healthcare as a market commodity, 3) Limited role of government in healthcare, 4) Influence of technology, and 5) Effect of medical malpractice litigation. It analyzes each factor in more depth, particularly the role of physicians in establishing standards and controlling financing mechanisms, and how this led to physicians operating as self-interested entrepreneurs and healthcare as a market-based system. The document also discusses the increasing but still limited role of government in healthcare financing and regulation.
This document discusses factors that influence payments to physicians, including moral, ethical, political and economic considerations. It focuses on three key moral/ethical dimensions in American society that must be considered when developing payment controls: the love of liberty and independence, the passion for fairness and equity, and the urge for volunteerism. Any solution that places controls on physician payments must respect these enduring American institutions and principles that are deeply rooted in U.S. history and culture.
Bishop Desmond Tutu is known globally for his leadership in the fight against apartheid in South Africa and his advocacy for forgiveness and reconciliation. As the Archbishop of Cape Town, Tutu was a vocal critic of apartheid and promoted non-violent resistance. He chaired South Africa's Truth and Reconciliation Commission following the end of apartheid to document human rights abuses and promote healing. Tutu's moral philosophy emphasizes speaking truth to power, forgiveness, and restoring justice and human dignity for both victims and oppressors.
This document is a personal action paper written by Ardavan A. Shahroodi for a course on ethical leadership. It first analyzes philosophical theories of ethics discussed in the course, including utilitarianism, justice, rights, relativism, and egoism. It then discusses Donaldson's concept of core human values and a universal code of ethics. The paper reviews materials on ethical and unethical organizational leadership. It includes personal action journals completed in the course. The conclusion discusses how lessons from the course will help with ethical analysis, decision making, and leadership.
This document is a strategic leadership self-reflection paper by Ardavan A. Shahroodi. It discusses Shahroodi's understanding and practice of strategic leadership, with a focus on stakeholders, mission statements, and competitive advantage. The paper analyzes Shahroodi's view that customer service and employee satisfaction are key priorities. It also reflects on how Shahroodi's values of fairness and service were influenced by his mother and wife.
LDR 6140 Second Case Study Analysis--United TechnologiesArdavan Shahroodi
United Technologies is a highly diversified conglomerate with divisions in aerospace, building systems, and other industries. It has pursued an unrelated diversification strategy through acquisitions to reduce risk and dependence on any single market. The company implements an operating system called ACE to standardize processes and continuously improve efficiency, quality, and innovation across divisions. United Technologies has experienced significant growth and increased profitability through this strategy and operating system. The analysis recommends UTC continue refining ACE to strengthen its competitive position going forward.
LDR 6140 Second Case Study Analysis--United Technologies
HMG 6110 Final Term Paper Important Historical and Current Trends in Health Care that have Led to the Demands for Change
1. RunningHead: Historical andCurrentTrends in HealthCare that have Ledto the DemandsforChange
Important Historical and Current Trends in U.S. Health Care that have Led to the Demands for
Change
Ardavan A. Shahroodi
Northeastern University
Professor James J. Ferriter
HMG-6110- The Organization, Administration, Financing and History of Health Care in the U.S.
Final Term Paper
Thursday, May 16, 2013
2. Historical and CurrentTrendsin HealthCare that have Ledto the Demandsfor Change
Introduction
Our system of health care is facing a number of crucial decisions in the coming years.
An era of ever increasing cost over runs in the health care environment has placed unsustainable
financial pressures on our economy and public treasuries. In spite of these uncontrollable
expenditures, the quality of the health care products and services suffer from inconsistencies and
lack of uniformity in effectiveness and implementation. In addition, until very recently a sizable
minority of the population did not enjoy the protection of any health care insurance coverage.
The reforms of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) aim to rectify some of the most intractable
problems in the care system such as the lack of health insurance for so many Americans. ACA
will also create a number of initiatives, organizations and financial incentives that will contribute
towards improving quality and controlling the cost escalation associated with delivering health
care in this country.
Unsustainable Cost Structure in the Present and the Specter of Ever Increasing Cost
Escalation on the Horizon
In a historical analysis of the health care expenditures in the U.S., Barr (2011) brings
attention to the fact that in 1970, “people in the United States spent a total of $73 billion, or an
average of $ 341 per person per year, on all types of health care combined” (p. 19). At the time,
this amount represented 7.1 percent of the gross domestic product (GDP) of the country (Barr,
2011, p. 19). Sisko et al. (2010) estimate that total health care expenditures in 2009 had
escalated to $2.5 trillion that was 17.3 percent of the GDP and the average per person cost had
risen to $8,200 on a yearly basis (as cited by Barr, 2011, p. 19). Truffer et al. (2010) project that
by 2019; health care costs will have risen to 19.3 percent of the GDP (as cited by Barr, 2011, p.
19).
3. Historical and CurrentTrendsin HealthCare that have Ledto the Demandsfor Change
With respect to the cost of the Medicare Insurance program that covers those over 65
years old and represents a significant portion of health care expenditures in this country, Barr
(2011) informs us that the price of this particular entitlement had risen “from $4.2 billion in 1967
to $9.3 billion in 1973” (p. 140). Barr (2011) adds that “in 2009…Medicare expenditures for
Part A + Part B totaled $448 billion” (p. 140) and by 2010, “the cost of all Medicare programs
combined was $504 billion. As a result, presently, the cost for Medicare programs comprise
approximately 1 in every 5 dollars spent on health care, in light of the above figure for total
national expenditures of $2.5 trillion dollars on a yearly basis. The Kaiser Family Foundation
(2013) has estimated that “Medicare spending is projected to grow from $551 billion to $1
trillion in 2022” (Medicare at a Glance, Nov 14, 2012).
Some important additional statistics here are that when Medicare was introduced in the
U.S. during the 1960s, “approximately 9.5 percent of the country’s population was 65 years or
older” (Barr, 2011, p. 143). However, by 2010, this number of persons over 65 years old had
risen to 13 percent of the population (Barr, 2011, p. 143). Furthermore, Barr (2011) states that
“current projections predict that the proportion of the population 65 or over will rise to 16.1
percent by 2020 and 19.3 percent by 2030” (p. 143).
Kaiser Family Foundation (2010) has estimated that in 2006, “Medicare spent an average
of 8,344 per elderly beneficiary (not including the cost of prescription drug coverage” (as cited in
Barr, 2011, p. 143). This is a very interesting number since Kaiser Family Foundation (2010)
also tells us that “the sickest 10 percent of beneficiaries had an average annual per capita cost of
$48,210, and accounted for nearly 60 percent of all spending” (as cited in Barr, 2011, p. 143).
On the other hand, Kaiser Family Foundation (2010) informs us that in 2006 almost 34 percent
4. Historical and CurrentTrendsin HealthCare that have Ledto the Demandsfor Change
of the beneficiaries in the Medicare program spent in between zero to one percent of the total
expenditures (as cited in Barr, 2010, p. 143).
Kaiser Family Foundation (Medicare at a Glance, Nov 14, 2012), has estimated
that from 2000 to 2012, Medicare and private health insurance per capita spending has
experienced an average annual growth rate of 6.9 percent, while per capita GDP has increased by
2.9 percent and the Consumer Price Index (CPI) has increased by 2.5 percent. Kaiser Family
Foundation (Medicare at a Glance, Nov 14, 2012) projects that from 2012 to 2021, Medicare and
private health insurance will increase an average annual growth rate of 3.6 and 5 percent
respectively, while per capita GDP will be enhanced by 4 percent and the Consumer Price Index
will increase by 2.1 percent.
In spite of the aforementioned costs estimates and projections, it is most important to
keep in mind that “the Medicare system, despite being one of the largest government programs in
history, has proven to be one of the most efficient administrative systems for providing health
care to a defined population of patients” (Barr, 2011, p. 161). When we take the percentage
insurance programs spend on administrative expenses, we observe that these costs for Medicare
Parts A and B vary between 1 to 2.5 percent, while employer-based insurance programs
experience non-patient care costs that run anywhere from 10 to 30 percent and nonprofit HMOs
experience non-patient care costs of 3 to 7 percent (Barr, 2011, p. 161). The conclusion that we
may draw from the above figures is that cost escalation in the case of Medicare is unrelated to
matters of administrative efficiency.
In regards to the Medicaid program, Kaiser Family Foundation (The Medicaid Program
at a Glance, March 04, 2013) estimates that in FY 2011 “total Medicaid spending excluding
administration (5%, data not shown) totaled $414 billion”. Kaiser Family Foundation (The
5. Historical and CurrentTrendsin HealthCare that have Ledto the Demandsfor Change
Medicaid Program at a Glance, March 04, 2013) does bring to our attention that two-thirds of
Medicaid spending “was attributable to acute care and one-third went toward long-term care”
while “roughly two-thirds of Medicaid spending is attributable to elderly disabled beneficiaries”.
Here, Barr (2011) adds that “Sixty-seven percent of Medicaid costs go to provide care for 25
percent of beneficiaries” (p. 173). As much as low income children and adults comprise 75
percent of Medicaid beneficiaries, only 32 percent of spending is attributable to these population
groups (Barr, 2011, p. 173). The Office of the Actuary (OACT) in the centers for Medicaid and
Medicare Services (CMS) (March 2012) has projected that Medicaid expenditures are to
“increase at an average annual rate of 6.4 percent over the next 10 years, and to reach $795.0
billion by 2021 (total outlays not just federal)” (as cited in Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and
the Uninsured Issue Paper, March 2013).
The rising expenditure on prescription drugs is another factor contributing to the
escalating health care cost structure in the U.S. Prescription drug expenditures in 1980, U.S.
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (data from website) inform us, totaled 4.9 percent
of all heath care costs (as cited in Barr, 2011, p. 215). In 1990, those costs had risen to 5.8
percent and by 2003 the expenditures had a 10.7 percent of the national health care costs (Barr,
2011, p. 215). Barr informs us that “between 1993 and 2003, while national health expenditures
increased 89 percent, expenditures for prescription drugs increased 249 percent” (Barr, 2011, p.
215). Nevertheless, Barr (2011) relays to us that “the cost of prescription drugs is projected to
remain at approximately 10 percent of national health expenditures through 2019” (p. 215). A
Kaiser Family Foundation (2004) study of the period 1997-2002, attributed the increase in
expenditures of prescription drugs to the “increases in the number of prescriptions issued/44
percent” (as cited in Barr, 2011, p. 216), “manufacturers’ price increases for existing drugs/25
6. Historical and CurrentTrendsin HealthCare that have Ledto the Demandsfor Change
percent” (Ibid) and “shifting from a less expensive drug to a more expensive drug for the same
illness/34 percent” (Ibid).
Barr (2011) points towards a number of factors in the U.S. that are causing and will cause
in the future for the cost of health care to increase. First, an expanding population and as
suggested in the preceding sections an ever larger population of elderly Americans enhance
health care expenditures. Second, “the number of people receiving treatment for a specific
illness may go up” (Barr, 2011, p. 22) due to the pattern that “either the illness is becoming more
common, or more people with the condition may seek treatment” (Ibid). These illnesses or
treatments could be diabetes, cardio vascular disease, mental illness, orthopedic surgery or other
maladies and therapeutic solutions. Third, the expense of treating an illness may increase based
on “new, more advanced (and more high-tech) treatments becoming available, replacing older,
less expensive (and more low-tech) treatments” (Barr, 2011, p. 22).
Barr (2011) also argues that in the U.S., “technology and technological advances” (p. 56)
occupy a special place in our national purpose and psyche and as a result advances in medical
technology are highly valued, “even when the added benefit of these treatments is small
compared to their cost” (p. 56). Fuchs (1983) refers to this tendency as “the technological
imperative” (as cited in Barr, 2011, p. 57) where both physicians and patients understand quality
in terms of the aggressive usage of more advanced technologies in the treatment of disease. This
inclination “to equate technology with quality” (Barr, 2011, p. 57) has brought us to a belief
system that asserts “the more technological a treatment is, the better it is” (Ibid) and that “as
patients we have not received complete treatment unless we receive the most advanced
technology” (Ibid).
7. Historical and CurrentTrendsin HealthCare that have Ledto the Demandsfor Change
Barr (2011) uses a number of examples to illustrate the above phenomenon such as the
practice of ordering MRIs for an overwhelming number of orthopedic related conditions
regardless of the severity of the patient’s injuries (p. 56). The same situation is prevalent with
the usage of the “relatively expensive” (Barr, 2011, p. 57) prostate specific antigen (PSA) blood
test that possesses “a high risk of false-positive results” (Ibid). In addition, there is also the case
of medications for controlling blood pressure where ALLHAT Collaborative Research Group
(2002) found that the standard treatment of “diuretics are superior in preventing one or more
major forms of cardiovascular disease and are less expensive. They should be preferred for first-
step anti-hypertensive therapy” (as cited in Barr, 2011, p. 59). Nevertheless, other more
expensive and technologically advanced medications are still being widely used in spite of the
scientific evidence to the contrary regarding their superiority to diuretics in treating high blood
pressure.
Barr (2011) also introduces the opinions of Hillman and Goldsmith (2010) in describing
the roots of health care cost escalation in the U.S. Hillman and Goldsmith (2010) argue that
“there has been an imaging boom in U.S. health care” although “an unknown but substantial
fraction of imaging examinations are unnecessary and do not positively contribute to patient
care…the evidence basis for using imaging is incomplete” (as cited in Barr, 2011, p. 64). In a
similar observation, Leff and Finucane (2008) describe this all-consuming prevalence of “high-
tech imaging and other devices as gizmo idolatry” (as cited in Barr, 2011, p. 64) based on the
belief that “a more technological approach is intrinsically better than one that is less
technological unless, or perhaps even if, there is strong evidence to the contrary” (Ibid). Barr
(2011) contends the prevailing inclination of physicians in this country to practice “defensive
medicine” (p. 65) based on concerns for malpractice lawsuits has added “billions of dollars to
8. Historical and CurrentTrendsin HealthCare that have Ledto the Demandsfor Change
our health care budget by ordering extra tests and procedures that add little to care but present a
stronger defense ” (Ibid) in the event of patient oriented litigation.
The Inability of Managed Care and Managed Competition to Mitigate Cost Escalation
and Improve Quality
The concept of managed care health plans or health maintenance organizations (HMOs)
was first introduced by organizations such as the respectable Kaiser Permanente system in the
state of California. These non-profit operations were also labeled as “prepaid group practice”
(Barr, 2011, p. 106) who charged a “fixed monthly fee” (Ibid) or “capitation rate” (Ibid) and in
exchange provided for their members hospital care, physician care and “other outpatient
services” (p. 107). In the beginning, these health care plans “were consistently able to provide
comprehensive care at a substantially lower cost than the insurance plans using the traditional
fee-for-service method of paying for care” (Barr, 2011, p. 107).
A study by Manning et al. (1984) at the Rand Corporation found that “given comparable
patient populations, prepaid group practice service plans could be as much as one-third less
expensive than fee-for-service insurance plans for comparable care” (as cited by Barr, 2011, p.
107). Nevertheless, a further study by Davies et al. (1986) pointed towards “lower patient
satisfaction in a number of aspects of the primary care process” (as cited in Barr, 2011, p. 108)
with respect to the HMO operations. A third large study, called the Medical Outcome Study by
Safran, Tarlov and Rogers (1994) spanning a period of four years and involving “1208 patients
with chronic diseases” also found that “group HMO had a lower cost of care and better
communication among specialists and primary care physicians” (as cited in Barr, 2011, p. 113).
However, in this study, HMOs had lower ratings than other care arrangements (fee-for-service)
in “access to care, continuity of care, and comprehensiveness of care” (Barr, 2011, p. 113). In all
9. Historical and CurrentTrendsin HealthCare that have Ledto the Demandsfor Change
these and other studies, HMOs projected lower “patient satisfaction” (Barr, 2011, p. 114) ratings
“versus traditional fee-for-service practitioners” (Ibid).
The success of HMOs in controlling costs led some reformers such as Enthoven
(1980) to propose the creation of “a national system of health care centered on the concept of
groups of health care purchasers banding together to obtain health insurance from competing
health insurers” (as cited in Barr, 2011, p. 116). Enthoven (1980) proposed “a system of fair
economic competition in which customers and providers of care, making decisions in an
appropriately structured private market” (as cited in Barr, 2011, p. 116) would replace a system
of health care based on “built-in cost-increasing incentives” (Ibid) with one structured on “built-
in incentives for customer satisfaction and cost control” (Ibid). However, Barr (2011) reminds
us that the inherent inefficiencies in our system of health care such as the non-taxable nature of
health insurance premiums and the “system of paying physicians a separate fee for each service
provided regardless of the added benefit of that service” (p. 119) has created an environment
with “patients expecting and physicians providing a great deal of expensive care with relatively
little marginal benefit” (Ibid). Nevertheless, Enthoven (1980) did propose the creation of a
system of health care where “on a regional basis…patients choose between competing systems
of managed care” (Managed Competition) (as cited in Barr, 2011, p. 118).
However, as North (1986) would argue and Barr (2011) paraphrases “many types of
institutional force inhibit the ability of markets to achieve efficiency” (as cited in Barr, 2011, p.
124) such as the “technological imperative” (Ibid) discussed in the preceding paragraphs. In
addition, the concept of managed competition has remained largely theoretical with many small
and medium size firms offering only one or two managed care plans to their employees. The
Kaiser Family Foundation and Health Research and Educational Trust reported that in 2009,
10. Historical and CurrentTrendsin HealthCare that have Ledto the Demandsfor Change
almost 80 percent of employees nationally had the choice of access to only one or two health
plans (as cited in Barr, 2011, p. 127). Where, managed care operations did endeavor to control
costs they utilized strategies that was meant “to reduce the use of care, and through a reduction in
the amount they would pay physicians and hospitals for care” (Barr, 2011, p. 128). Both these
strategies created the “managed care backlash” (Barr, 2011, p. 128) that led the purchasers of
insurance “to accept the reality of increasing health care costs” (Ibid).
The aforementioned measures that some managed care organizations (mostly for-profit)
utilized in order to control expenses included the usage of primary care physicians (PCPs) as
gatekeepers “for other care the patient might need” (Barr, 2011, p. 194). The usage of the
PCPs as gatekeepers proved on occasion to be a controversial practice when physicians
“received a fixed amount of money to provide all out-patient care and tests for each patient in his
or her practice for a given period of time” and this total amount would also include their salary.
Consequently, the PCPs would continuously have to face the predicament of potential conflict of
interest scenarios that placed them in an untenable decision making quandary. As Barr (2011)
would argue, “linking the gatekeeper function directly to the physician’s income created an
obvious ethical conflict” (p. 195).
A further practice of managed care organizations that proved to be problematic was the
usage of the “utilization review department” (Barr, 2011, p. 195) that monitored and “reviewed
the care provided by physicians” (Ibid). The utilization review department would have to grant
prior approval in order for physicians to be able to order expensive tests such as MRIs or admit
their patients to hospitals. In addition, the utilization review departments would also monitor the
patients while they were in the hospital so that physicians do not keep them in those
environments for “too long” (Barr, 2011, p. 195).
11. Historical and CurrentTrendsin HealthCare that have Ledto the Demandsfor Change
In many instances, managed care organizations “gathered statistics on how often each
physician used expensive resources such as MRIs, drugs, hospitals, operations and the like”
(Barr, 2011, p. 195). Managed care organizations would then “penalized physicians whose
profile exceeded what the reviewers thought was appropriate” (Barr, 2011, p. 195) with the
usage of these “physician practice profiles” (Ibid). On the other hand, a number of managed
care operations followed the practice of rewarding physicians that “had kept down costs during
the year” (Barr, 2011, p. 196) by directly linking a physician’s bonus to “the cost of the care that
the physician had ordered during the year” (Ibid).
The aforementioned annunciated procedures of evaluating a physician’s performance
primarily on the basis of her or his financial decision making was not replicated in all managed
care operations. Some managed care operations have developed “structured programs of
education and feedback to remind physicians which type of care are most appropriate and which
type may be inappropriate” (Barr, 2011, p. 196). In addition, highly respected non-profit
managed care organizations such as the Kaiser Permanente system have never utilized a direct
bonus system and the physicians have always received an indirect bonus. In the event that the
cost of care “was less than the amount budgeted, the surplus was not added to the bonus pool but
rather was invested in the Kaiser Permanente system” (Barr, 2011, p. 198). Furthermore, the
Kaiser Permanente system places a heavy emphasis on “physician education and feedback, and
on gatekeeper systems that were not linked to physician compensation” (Barr, 2011, p. 198).
In spite of the credibility that organizations such as the Kaiser Permanente system bring
to the managed care environment, Arnold Relman (2007), a former editor of the authoritative
New England Journal of Medicine has stated that “the entry and growth of innumerable private
investor-owned businesses that sell health insurance and deliver medical care with a primary
12. Historical and CurrentTrendsin HealthCare that have Ledto the Demandsfor Change
concern for the maximization of their income” (as cited in Barr, 2011, p. 211) has dominated the
delivery of health care. In a most troubling statement that may possess profound consequences
for all of us, Relman (2007) argues that,
“the continued privatization of health care and the continued prevalence and intrusion of
market forces in the practice of medicine will not only bankrupt the health care system, but also
inevitably undermine the ethical foundations of medical practice and dissolve the moral precepts
that have historically defined the medical practice” (as cited in Barr, 2011, p. 211).
Gawande (June 1, 2009) argues that in certain communities “physicians who see their
practice primarily as a revenue stream” and view their patients as “profit centers” have come to
“predominate” the health care profession. In citing the research of Woody Powell (a Stanford
sociologist) regarding the “anchor-tenant theory of economic development”, Gawande (June 1,
2009) observes that in these health care communities the aforementioned anchors/practitioners
“set the norms” for medical practice. However, on the other end of the spectrum, world class
and highly effective health care organizations such as the Mayo clinic promote leaders “who
focused first on what was best for patients, and then on how to make this financially possible”
(Gawande, June 1, 2009).
In the Mayo Clinic, Gawande (June 1, 2009) observes “The needs of the patient come
first-not the convenience of the doctors, not their revenues” and in this mission the entire work
force sill have weekly meetings in order to “make the service and the care better”. In addition, in
the Mayo Clinic, all the employees including the physicians receive a salary so that the “doctor’s
goal in patient care couldn’t be increasing their income” (Gawande, June 1, 2009). One of the
central challenges of our health care system is how to evolve form a process oriented and
transaction based structure susceptible to the abuses, cost overruns and inefficiencies
13. Historical and CurrentTrendsin HealthCare that have Ledto the Demandsfor Change
annunciated in the Gawande (June 1, 2009) article to a system replicating the standards of an
organization such as the Mayo Clinic that are outcome oriented, accountable, quality laden,
patient centered and effective. As Professor Ferriter (Class 6, Lecture Outline, P. 4) has stated
such a system will also be cognizant of the fact that “profit in and of itself is not inherently bad,
but should not drive the decision to deliver the best care in a competitive market”.
The Problem of the Uninsured and other Barriers that Compromise Access to Health Care
Barr (2011) informs us that in 2009, approximately “16.7 percent of Americans-50.7
million people-faced the prospect of illness or injury with no health insurance” (p. 253). This
number of people without coverage does not include those who “were without insurance for
some period of time during the year but were not uninsured for the entire year” (Barr, 2011, p.
256). A number of people change jobs and careers and are without insurance for a period of time
and many college students do not have coverage in between the period between graduation and
full or partial employment (Barr, 2011, p. 256). Many “self-employed may cancel their coverage
for a period of time and enroll with a new insurance carrier” (Barr, 2011, p. 257). The important
point being that the 16.7 percent statistic of Americans who are uninsured for the entire year
does not include those who are without insurance for a partial segment of the year.
In order to acquire a picture of who are the uninsured we must realize that “only 30.5
percent of the uninsured come from low-income families (families with income less than
$25,000)” (Barr, 2011, p. 258). Consequently, almost half of those who have no insurance “are
from families with a household income between $25,000 and $75,000 per year” (Barr, 2011, p.
258). In regards to the age of the uninsured, Barr (2011) informs us that “forty-one percent of
the uninsured are young adults 18 and 34” (p. 258) and “Fifteen percent of the uninsured are
children” (Ibid). The Hispanic population of this country comprises 32 percent of the uninsured,
14. Historical and CurrentTrendsin HealthCare that have Ledto the Demandsfor Change
the black population is 13 percent of the uninsured and the Asian/Pacific Islanders make up 5
percent of the uninsured (Barr, 2011, p. 258).
Crucially, approximately 34 percent of uninsured workers were “employed full-time
during the year” (Barr, 2011, p. 259) and 35 percent of the uninsured were employed in part-time
work. Furthermore, “only 31 percent of uninsured adults did not work” (Barr, 2011, p. 258).
Barr (2011) brings to our attention that the uninsured are not only the “poor and the
unemployed” (Barr, 2011, p. 260), rather the uninsured are mostly from “middle class, working
families” (Ibid).
The employment related aspects of the uninsured problem is rooted in the fact that low-
wage workers are not offered health insurance by their employers as often as higher-wage
workers (Barr, 2011, p. 260). In addition, many low-wage workers simply cannot afford the
health insurance coverage that is offered through their place of employment although “many
employers make coverage available” (Barr, 2011, p. 260). Furthermore, Kaiser Family
Foundation and Health Research Educational Trust (2010) estimated that in 2010 “only 44
percent of workers employed in firms with fewer than twenty-five employees were covered by
their employer’s health insurance” (as cited in Barr, 2011, p. 261) as compared with “60 percent
of employees in firms with 25 to 199 employees, and 63 percent of employees in firms with 200
or more employees” (Ibid).
Barr (2011) reminds us that when health care costs increase “many at the margins of the
health insurance market lose coverage” (p. 268). On the other hand, when the economy is
contracting, a falling GDP and rising unemployment rate interchangeably will also lead to lower
rates of employment-based insurance.
15. Historical and CurrentTrendsin HealthCare that have Ledto the Demandsfor Change
A number of other factors compromise or act as barriers in “gaining access to high
quality care” (Barr, 2011, p. 273). As an example, Braveman et al. (1994) found that in a study
of patients that suffered from acute appendicitis, those who were covered “with either Medicaid
or no insurance had approximately a 50 percent greater risk of developing a ruptured appendix
than patients with HMO coverage” (as cited in Barr, 2011, p. 274). In addition, those who were
covered with a fee-for-service plan were at a 20 percent increased risk of developing a ruptured
appendix in comparison to those on a HMO plan (as cited in Barr, 2011, p. 274). Barr (2011)
surmises that patients on HMO plan are required to choose a primary care physician (PCP) upon
joining and consequently “Having a previously identified provider can facilitate care in an urgent
situation” (p. 275). On the other hand, patients on a fee-for-service plan may delay finding a
PCP and “may end up finding care in the emergency room” (Barr, 2011, p. 275). In general,
patients on fee-for-service plans pay higher deductibles and co-payments than those on HMO
coverage that “may lead to patients delaying necessary care” (Barr, 2011, p. 275).
A further potential barrier to care is the out-of-pocket expenses that a patient may have to
pay in order to secure medical services. Newhouse et al. (1981) found “an association between
the amount a patient must pay and the frequency with which the patient will obtain care” (as
cited in Barr, 2011, p. 275). Barr (2011) concludes from this study that “when a patient is
responsible for paying for part of the cost of care, he or she is less likely to use that care. This
association applies to necessary care as well as to unnecessary care (p. 276). A related barrier
that emanates from economic/financial limitations is experienced by Medicaid patients who are
at times unable to access care due to their particular insurance coverage. Here, Asplin et al.
(2005) conducted a study of patients that suffered form “a potentially serious medical problem”
(as cited in Barr, 2011, p. 278) such as “pneumonia, sever high blood pressure” (Ibid). In this
16. Historical and CurrentTrendsin HealthCare that have Ledto the Demandsfor Change
study when trained callers (graduate students) would inform “clinics and doctors’ offices” (as
cited in Barr, 2011, p. 278) regarding their Medicaid insurance, only 34 percent of the time they
would be able to receive an appointment within a week. In contrast, callers who were trained to
state that they were covered by private insurance “were able to get an appointment for follow-up
care within one week” (as cited in Barr, 2011, p. 278).
An additional barrier to care is rooted in the racial characteristics of patients. When
comparing white and black patient who had suffered a heart attack and were seeking treatment in
a VA hospital, Peterson et al. (1994) found that “among male patients…blacks were significantly
less likely than whites to receive aggressive care involving revascularization” (as cited in Barr,
2011, p. 280). A number of other studies also have reported “racial differences in access to care”
(Barr, 2011, p. 280) and “paint a disturbing picture of continuing racial differences in access”
(Ibid). Barr (2011) also states that “For a variety of serious medical conditions and in a variety
of settings and geographic locations, black patients receive less aggressive and lower-quality
medical care than white patients with the same disease. Even after taking into account the type of
insurance” (p. 281). Barr (2011) traces some of this unequal treatment of black patients to
“subtle often unconscious bias” (p. 284) that “nonetheless can result in lower-quality care for
black and other minority patients” (Ibid).
Lozano, Connell, and Koepsell (1995) and Rosenstreich et al. have found that other
barriers such as unsanitary and unhealthy living conditions that lead some parents of children
susceptible to asthma attacks to rely “more on the emergency room for care than the doctor’s
office” (as cited in Barr, 2011, p. 285) also compromise care. In addition, “many patients in
rural areas are not as close to health care facilities” (Barr, 2011, p. 286) in comparison to those in
urban areas and those in low income neighborhoods in urban locations face a shortage and lack
17. Historical and CurrentTrendsin HealthCare that have Ledto the Demandsfor Change
of health care resources regardless of insurance. All these barriers are also elevated with issues
having to do with securing transportation, child care and taking “time off work” (Barr, 2011, p.
286).
Cultural, ethnic and linguistic barriers also compromise access to quality health care.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2000, website) has mandated that “all health
care providers that receive federal funds” (Barr, 2011, p. 287) to “provide language
assistance…at no cost to each patient/customer with limited English proficiency” (as cited in
Barr, 2011, p. 287). Nevertheless, with respect to serving multi-lingual care seekers, Blendon et
al. (2007) have found “persistent problems in communication between patients and physicians or
other providers of care” (as cited in Barr, 2011, p. 287) and many educators in the medical field
and government officials have called for “better training of physicians and other health care
providers in what has come to be called cultural competence” (Barr, 2011, p. 287).
Barr (2011) has referred to “organizational complexity” (pp. 288-291) as a further barrier
to receiving quality health care. Here, Barr (2011) brings to our attention that the “managers of a
human service organization…tend to emphasize efficiency in the work of the organization” (p.
290). In this context, efficiency is measured on the basis of how many patients have been seen
or have received treatment per hour. However, Barr (2011) argues that such a dynamic will
create an inherent conflict in the health care environment where a provider is “caught between
the patient’s desire for good service and management’s emphasis on efficient work” (p. 290).
Eventually, Barr (2011) contends this “role conflict often leads to decreased worker satisfaction
and a tendency to become less sensitive to the needs of patients’ (p. 290).
18. Historical and CurrentTrendsin HealthCare that have Ledto the Demandsfor Change
The Reforms of the Affordable Care Act Intended to Expand Access, Improve Quality and
Control Cost in the Health Care System
Under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) Medicaid coverage is extended to “all citizens and
permanent residents with incomes below 133 percent of FPL/Federal Poverty Level” (Barr,
2011, p. 271). ACA also provides a tax credit for those in between 133 to 400 percent of the
FPL in order to facilitate the purchasing of coverage from “health benefit exchanges (HBEs),
operated by the state government or by a nonprofit organization” (Barr, 2011, p. 271). In
addition, under ACA, primary care physicians (PCPs) who treat Medicaid Patients will be
reimbursed “100 percent of the rate paid by the Medicare program” (Barr, 2011, p. 293) with the
hope that physicians who accept Medicare patients will also begin accepting those who are
covered under the Medicaid program. With respect to entities that have a work force of more
than 50 employees, ACA mandates that employers extend coverage to their employees or pay a
penalty of $2,000 for each staff member without coverage (Barr, 2011, p. 271) All in all,
approximately 32 million people will begin gaining access to health insurance coverage under
ACA.
ACA will “invest heavily in the expansions of nonprofit community health centers”
(Barr, 2011, p. 293). These organizations are referred to as the “federally qualified health
centers” (FQHCs) (Barr, 2011, p. 293) that will receive additional funding in order to treat
Medicaid patients and hire extra staff members. ACAs vision of FQHCs is to become a model of
what the American Academy of family Physicians, American Academy of Pediatrics, American
College of Physicians, and American Osteopathic Association (2007) call “patient-centered
medical home” (as cited in Barr, 2011, p. 293) organizations by “developing a team-based
approach to the management of chronic disease” (Ibid) that will enhance “the comprehensiveness
19. Historical and CurrentTrendsin HealthCare that have Ledto the Demandsfor Change
of care, the continuity of care, and ultimately the quality of care” (Ibid). In addition, ACA has
created a new organization “to study…new arrangement for care” (Barr, 2011, p. 164) called the
Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovations (CMMI). One of the concentrations of CMMI is
to research strategies for “groups of physicians and hospitals to come together to form
accountable care organizations (ACOs) that will be responsible for “planning, coordinating, and
providing the care of a group of Medicare beneficiaries” (Barr, 2011, p. 164) ACA has also
mandated that care providers must collect data “on race, ethnicity, primary language, disability
status, and similar demographic characteristics of the patients cared for” (Barr, 2011, p. 293) in
order to evaluate “racial and ethnic disparities in access to care” (Ibid).
In regards to insurers, under ACA, “companies are prohibited from considering pre-
existing conditions to deny coverage to an applicant” (Barr, 2011, p. 212). In addition, those
who apply for insurance must be charged a similar premium “regardless of pre-existing
conditions” (Barr, 2011, p. 212). Although some exceptions are made in rate differentiation
having to do with age, tobacco use, “participation in a health promotion program” (Barr, 2011, p.
212), etc. Furthermore, ACA does not allow “caps on the amount an insurance plan will pay for
care, either per year or for a patient’s lifetime” (Barr, 2011, p. 212).
In order to address the issue of health care cost escalation and particularly the rising cost
of Medicare, ACA has created the Independent Payment Advisory Board (IPAB) that is
composed of fifteen members appointed by the president and confirmed by the Senate. IPAB
will appraise/forecast the rate of growth of Medicare spending on a per beneficiary basis and
compare that increase with the target rate of growth for this federal program that will be
estimated by ACA. The target rate of growth set by the ACA for Medicare spending is based on
the rate of growth of the consumer price index (CPI) and the rate of growth of the GDP. In the
20. Historical and CurrentTrendsin HealthCare that have Ledto the Demandsfor Change
event that the rate of growth of Medicare spending is projected to “exceed the target amount,
IPAB is charged with the responsibility of coming up with a plan to rein in spending to meet the
target amount” (Barr, 2011, p. 164)). Nevertheless, IPAB’s recommendations must not include
any measures that may “ration health care, raise revenue [that is, taxes] or Medicare beneficiary
premiums…or increase Medicare beneficiary cost sharing (including deductibles, coinsurance
and copayments), or otherwise restrict benefits or modify eligibility criteria” (Barr, 2011, p.
164).
Conclusion
Our process oriented and transaction based system of health care is in a state of cost
escalation crisis. At these rates of ever increasing expenditures other major segments of our
economy will suffer and the public sector will be unable to support the fiscal viability of the
health care system. Nevertheless, in spite of this massive investment of financial resources
major issues remain concerned with the creation of an effective, accountable, patient centered,
quality laden and outcome oriented system of delivering health care. One of the primary goals of
the Affordable Care Act (ACA) is to offer health insurance protection to more than 50 million
Americans who possessed no coverage in the past. Through the creation of a number of
organizations and financial incentives in addition to the adoption of several initiatives promoting
patient satisfaction, provider team work and increased communication among care givers ACA
hopes to improve quality, expand access and effectively manage the growth of health
expenditures.
21. Historical and CurrentTrendsin HealthCare that have Ledto the Demandsfor Change
References
ALLHAT Collaborative Research Group. 2002. Major outcomes in high risk hypertensive
patients randomized to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or calcium channel
blocker vs. diuretic. JAMA 288:2981-97.
American Academy of Family Physicians, American Academy of Pediatrics, American College
of Physicians, and American Osteopathic Association. (2007). Joint principles of the
patient-centered medical home, March,
http://www.medicalhomeinfo.org/downloads/pdfs/JointStatement.pdf.
Asplin, B. R., Rhodes, K. V., Levy, H. et al. (2005). Insurance status and access to urgent
ambulatory care follow-up appointments. JAMA 294:1248-54.
Barr, D. A. (2011). Introduction to U. S. Health Policy: The organization, financing, and
delivery of health care in America (3rd ed.). Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins
University Press.
Braveman, P., Schaff, V. M., Egerter, S., Bennett, T., Schecter, W. (1994). Insurance related
differences in the risk of ruptured appendix. New England Journal of Medicine 331:444-
49.
Blendon, R. J., Buhr, T., Cassify, E.F., et al. (2007). Disparities in health: Perspectives of a
multi-ethnic, multi-racial America. Health Affairs 26(5):1437-4.
22. Historical and CurrentTrendsin HealthCare that have Ledto the Demandsfor Change
Davies, A. R., Ware, J. E., Brook, R.H., et al. (1986). Consumer acceptance of prepaid and fee-
for-service medical care: Results from a randomized controlled trial. Health Services
Research 21:429-49.
Enthoven, A., (1980). Health Plan: The only practical solution to the soaring cost of medical
care. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley.
Ferriter, J.J. (Spring 2013). HMG 6110-The organization, administration, financing and history
of health care in the U.S. Class 6, Lecture Outline. Northeastern University. College of
Professional studies.
Fuchs, V. R. (1983). Who shall live? New York, NY: Basic Books.
Gawande, A. (June 1, 2009). The Cost Conundrum: What a Texas town can teach us about
healthcare. The New Yorker. Retrieved April 28, 2013, from
http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2009/06/01/090601fa_fact-gawande.
Hillman, B. J. & Goldsmith, J. C. (2010). The uncritical use of high tech medical imaging. New
England Journal of Medicine, June 23, http://wwwnejm.org.
Kaiser Family Foundation. 2004. Prescription Drug Trends. Fact Sheet No. 3057.
http://www.kff.org/rxdrugs/3057.cfm.
Kaiser Family Foundation. 2010. Medicare at a glance. January,
http://www.kff.org/medicare/factsheets.cfm.
Kaiser Family Foundation. November 14, 2012. Medicare at a glance. Retrieved May 8, 2013,
from http://www.kff.org/medicare/fact-sheet/medicare-at-a-glance-fact-sheet/
23. Historical and CurrentTrendsin HealthCare that have Ledto the Demandsfor Change
Kaiser Family Foundation. March 04, 2013. The Medicaid Program at a glance. Retrieved May
13, 2013, from http://www.kff.org/medicaid/fact-sheet/the-medicaid-program-at-a-
glance-update.
Kaiser Family Foundation and Health Research and Educational Trust. 2009. Employer Health
Benefits 2009 Annual Survey, http://www.ehbs.kff.org/.
Kaiser Family Foundation and Health Research and Educational Trust. 2010. Employer Health
benefits 2010 Annual Survey, http://www.ehbs.kff.org/.
Leff, B., Thomas, E., Finucane, T. E. (2008). Gizmo Idolatry. JAMA 299:1830-32.
Lozano, P., Connell, F. A., and Koepsell, T. D. (1995). Use of health services by African
American children with asthma on Medicaid. JAMA 274:469-73.
Manning, W. G., Leibowitz, A., Goldberg, G. A., et al. (1984). A controlled trial of the effect of
a prepaid group practice on use of services. New England Journal of Medicine 310:1505-
10.
Newhouse, J. P., Manning, W. G., Morris, C. N., et al. (1981). Some interim results form a
controlled trial of cost sharing in health insurance. New England Journal of Medicine
305:1501-7.
North, D. C. (1986). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. New York,
NY. Cambridge University press.
Peterson, E. D., Wright, S. M., Daley, J., and Thibault, G. E. (1994). Racial variations in cardiac
procedure use and survival following acute myocardial infraction in the Department of
Veterans Affairs. JAMA 271:1175-80.
24. Historical and CurrentTrendsin HealthCare that have Ledto the Demandsfor Change
Relman, A. S. (2007). Medical professionalism in a commercialized health care market. JAMA
298:2668-70.
Rosenstreich, D. L., Eggleston, P., Kattan, M., et al. (1997). The role of cockroach allergy and
exposure to cockroach allergen in causing morbidity among inner-city children with
asthma. New England Journal of Medicine 336:1356-63.
Safran, D., Tarlov, A. R. & Rogers, W. H. (1994). Primary care performance in fee-for-service
and prepaid health systems. JAMA 271:1579-86.
Sisco, A. M., Truffer, C. J., Keehnan, S. P., et al. (2010). National health spending projections:
The estimated impact of reform through 2019. Health Affairs. 10.377/hlthaff.2010.0788,
published online September 9.
Truffer, C. J., Keehan, S., Smith, S., et al (2010). Health spending projections through 2019:
The recession’s impact continues. Health Affairs 29(3):522-29.
The Office of the Actuary (OACT) in the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS).
March 2012. 2012 Actuarial Report on the Financial Outlook for Medicaid. Retrieved
May 13, 2013, from http://www.medicaid.gov/Medicaid-Chip-Program-Information/By-
Topics/Financing-and-Reimbursment/Actuarial-Report-on-Financial-Outlook-for-
Medicaid.html.