SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Inside:
• An in-depth look at the new
130 – 170 score scales
• Guidance on making the
transition to the new score scales
• Helpful considerations when
using GRE® scores
A helpful overview of
what you need to know
The new
Verbal Reasoning
and Quantitative
Reasoning
score scales:
Better
by Design™
Using the new score scales:
Here’s a quick review of the new score scales:
• Verbal Reasoning scores are reported on a
130 – 170 score scale, in one-point increments
(the prior 200 – 800 score scale was reported in
10-point increments).
• Quantitative Reasoning scores are reported on a
130 – 170 score scale, in one-point increments
(the prior 200 – 800 score scale was reported in
10-point increments).
• Analytical Writing scores are reported on the
0 – 6 score scale, in half-point increments.
How the new score scales provide
clearer differentiation
The 41-point score scales were selected to reflect the
changes in content, test length and the new psychometric
model of the GRE revised General Test.
In setting the new score scales, one goal was to have scores
spread out across the entire range of possible scores.
For example, in the case of the Quantitative Reasoning
scale, this will reduce the portion of test takers’ scores
that are “bunched” at the upper end of the scale —
as has been the case in the past — providing better
differentiation between top-scoring applicants.
Why one-point increments lead to
better decisions
Scores in the Verbal Reasoning and Quantitative Reasoning
measures are reported in one-point increments, making
it easier for you to distinguish performance differences
between your applicants.
For example, a 500 and a 520 on the prior Verbal
Reasoning score scale created the impression that there
was a bigger difference in ability than there actually was.
But by reporting in one-point increments, a 150 and 152,
for example, demonstrate small differences.
Now small score differences are less likely to be interpreted
as meaningful when comparing applicants — and larger
score differences will stand out more clearly.
How they provide more simplicity in comparing applicants.
The GRE® revised General Test was introduced in August 2011, making the most trusted
assessment of graduate-level skills even better — for you, and for your potential students.
With new question types and the new test-taker friendly design, the GRE revised General Test also features new score
scales for the Verbal Reasoning and Quantitative Reasoning measures. These new score scales will help you make more
meaningful comparisons between applicants — and even better admissions decisions for your program.
Scaled
Score
Percent of Examinees Scoring Lower than
Selected Scaled Scores
Verbal
Reasoning
Quantitative
Reasoning
160 86 84
159 84 82
158 79 79
157 77 77
156 72 74
155 69 69
154 64 67
153 62 65
152 56 61
151 51 56
150 48 53
149 42 49
148 40 44
147 36 40
146 31 36
145 28 32
144 26 26
143 21 22
142 18 19
141 16 16
140 13 12
139 10 10
Percentile Ranks:
A valuable source
of information
Percentile ranks are very
helpful when comparing
scores on the prior and new
tests because they’re indicative
of how well the test taker
performed in relation to other
test takers.
Here’s how:
• A percentile rank for a score
indicates the percentage of
test takers who took the test
and received a lower score.
• They’re based on the
performance of the current
reference group from a recent
three-year period.*
• The reference group is
updated every year, which
means the percentile rank for
any score may vary slightly
over the years.
*July1,2007-June30,2010.
Thecurrentpercentileranks will
beappropriateforusethrough
June2012.
A Sample of the Percentile Ranks Table
Based on the performances of examinees who tested between
July 1, 2007 and June 30, 2010.
To view the complete Percentile Ranks table, go to
www.ets.org/gre/percentile.
To learn more about using GRE scores, download the
GRE® Guide to the Use of Scores at www.ets.org/gre/guide.
Since GRE® scores are valid for five years, these concordance tables will help you understand the relationship
between scores on the new 130 – 170 score scales and scores on the prior 200 – 800 score scales — making it
easier for you to compare candidates.
Percentile ranks are also included on the concordance tables for your convenience. A sample portion of each
concordance table is shown to the right.
For business schools: The easy-to-use GRE® Comparison Tool
The GRE Comparison Tool places GRE scores in the context of GMAT®
Total scores, so business schools that are more familiar with GMAT
scores can understand and appropriately interpret GRE scores.
• This online tool calculates a predicted GMAT Total score
based on an applicant’s GRE Verbal Reasoning and
Quantitative Reasoning scores.
• You can calculate an estimated GMAT Total score by
entering GRE scores on either the 130 – 170 score
scales or the 200 – 800 score scales.
Try it now at www.ets.org/gre/comparison.
To help you more easily transition to using scores on the new score scales, we’ve created
two concordance tables — one for the Verbal Reasoning measure and one for the
Quantitative Reasoning measure.
Comparing applicants:
Using concordance tables to get familiar with
the new score scales.
A Sample of the Verbal Reasoning
Concordance Table
For use November 1, 2011 - June 30, 2012
A Sample of the Quantitative Reasoning
Concordance Table
For use November 1, 2011 - June 30, 2012
650 163 93
640 162 90
630 162 90
620 161 89
610 160 86
600 160 86
590 159 84
580 158 79
570 158 79
560 157 77
550 156 72
540 156 72
530 155 69
520 154 64
510 154 64
500 153 62
490 152 56
650 151 56
640 151 56
630 150 53
620 149 49
610 149 49
600 148 44
590 148 44
580 147 40
570 147 40
560 146 36
550 146 36
540 145 32
530 145 32
520 144 26
510 144 26
500 144 26
490 143 22
Scores on the
Prior Scale
EstimatedScores
on the
Current Scale
% Rank
Scores on the
Prior Scale
EstimatedScores
on the
Current Scale
% Rank
View the complete Verbal Reasoning and Quantitative Reasoning concordance tables at www.ets.org/gre/concordance.
To learn more about using GRE scores, download the
GRE® Guide to the Use of Scores at www.ets.org/gre/guide.
Here’s a closer look:
• Score reports for those who tested on or after August 1, 2011
show Verbal Reasoning and Quantitative Reasoning scores on
the new 130 – 170 score scales, in one-point increments.
• Score reports for those who tested before August 1, 2011
show scores originally earned on the 200 – 800 score scales,
along with corresponding estimated scores on the new
130 – 170 score scales.
• All score reports show the Analytical Writing measure scores
based on the 0 – 6 score scale, in half-point increments.
• All score reports show one set of percentile ranks for each
measure, which indicate how the applicant performed
in comparison to the reference group from a recent
three-year period.
Plus:
• You will also receive the test taker’s email address, phone
number, intended graduate major and more.
• New paper score reports feature the ETS® Security Guard —
a special heat-sensitive ink that, when activated, verifies the
report’s authenticity.
For your convenience, GRE® score reports are available in
these formats:
• paper reports
• electronic score files via SCORELINK® Internet Delivery Service
• electronic score files on CD-ROM
The new score report:
Redesigned to give you more information about applicants.
To learn about receiving scores via the SCORELINK service,
the fastest method of score reporting, go to
www.ets.org/gre/scorelink.
Estimated scores
on the current scale
for administrations
before August 2011.
New test-taker
information including
email address, telephone
number and intended
graduate major.
Special heat-sensitive
ink for added security.
Scores on the
prior scale for
administrations
before August 2011.
Percentile ranks
based on the
most recent
three-year period.
Scores on the
current scale for
administrations
in August 2011
or later.
To learn more about using GRE scores, download the
GRE® Guide to the Use of Scores at www.ets.org/gre/guide.
One of the most significant enhancements introduced with the GRE® revised General Test is
the advanced technology of the new Multi-Stage Test (MST) design. With the MST design, the
Verbal Reasoning and Quantitative Reasoning measures of the computer-based test are now
adaptive at the section level.
Here’s what that means for scoring:
• Each measure has two operational sections; the
computer selects the second section of a measure
based on the test taker’s performance on
the first section.
• Within each section, all questions contribute equally
to the final score.
• For each of the two measures, a raw score is computed,
which is based on the number of questions
answered correctly.
• The raw score is then converted to a scaled score
through a process called equating, which accounts for
GRE®
scores:
A look at how the test is scored.
minor variations in difficulty among the different
test editions as well as differences in difficulty among
individuals’ tests introduced by the section-level
adaptation. This means a given scaled score reflects
approximately the same level of performance —
regardless of which section was selected and when
the test was taken.
To learn more about scoring of the computer-based
and paper-based test for all three measures — Verbal
Reasoning, Quantitative Reasoning and Analytical
Writing — visit www.ets.org/gre/aboutscores.
As graduate and business school programs around the world become familiar with the
new score scales, it’s a good time to reflect on the benefits of using GRE scores.
For more than 60 years, the GRE General Test has been a valid predictor of success at the graduate level. With its
introduction in August 2011, the GRE revised General Test continues to:
• assess the skills that graduate and business school programs value — verbal reasoning, quantitative reasoning,
critical thinking and analytical writing.
• provide a common measure for comparing applicants with differing educational and cultural backgrounds.
• furnish independent information to supplement the evaluation of grades and recommendations.
• provide access to a broad, diverse pool of highly qualified applicants interested in pursuing an
advanced degree.
A look at how scores are helpful in the admissions process.
To learn more about using GRE scores, download the
GRE® Guide to the Use of Scores at www.ets.org/gre/guide.
As you become familiar with the new score scales and score report, now is also a
good time to review best practices for evaluating applicants’ scores. Following these
guidelines will help you make the best decisions for your program.
What to keep in mind when using the
new score scales
Make the transition to the new 130 – 170 score scales
Departments and programs that accept GRE® scores are
encouraged to transition from using the prior score scales
to using the new score scales. To make the transition, you
are encouraged to use scores from the prior test that are
converted to the new 130 – 170 score scales based on
the concordance tables — as well as the actual scores
from test takers who took the GRE revised General Test.
It is not recommended to take the new score scales and
revert to the prior score scales.
Use concordance information to transition to the
new score scales
Concordance tables show the relationship between the
scores on the prior score scales and new score scales.
These tables may be appropriately used for translating an
institution’s historical guidelines for GRE scores on the prior
score scales to the new score scales. Using the tables in this
way should result in the selection of approximately the
same proportion of students.
It’s important to note that the scores in the concordance
tables are approximations, not equivalences, and that a
test taker who has a particular score on the prior scale
would not necessarily obtain the exact concorded score
if they had taken the GRE revised General Test.
Score users should use special care in evaluating test
takers who received a Quantitative Reasoning score at
the top end of the prior 200 – 800 score scale. Now, with
the new 130 – 170 score scale, we can provide more
differentiation for higher ability test takers. However,
test takers who took the prior test and received an
800 on the Quantitative Reasoning measure received
the highest score possible that they were able to earn
on the measure. Therefore, this information should be
considered when making admissions decisions.
Refrain from making decisions based on small
score differences
One benefit of moving to one-point increments is that
small score differences are less likely to be interpreted
as meaningful differences. That’s why it’s recommended
that small differences in GRE scores not be used to make
distinctions among applicants.
Another thing to consider: With all standardized tests —
including the prior GRE General Test — there’s a standard
error of measurement (SEM). The SEM of the difference
between scores should be taken into account when
comparing applicants’ scores on the same measure,
because this means a score in a measure may actually be
a few points higher or lower than reported. SEMs vary by
test; the SEMs for GRE tests are available in the
GRE® Guide to the Use of Scores, which you can download
at www.ets.org/gre/guide.
Best practices:
HelpfulguidelinesforusingGRE® scoresinyouradmissionsprocess.
Other resources to help you make the transition to the new score scales
Visit www.ets.org/gre/infocenter to:
• Register for an upcoming webinar, featuring live QA session with GRE measurement experts.
• Sign up for our eUpdate newsletter to receive updates and stay informed about the GRE revised General Test.
Plus, go to www.ets.org/gre/scoring to:
• Review concordance tables for the Verbal Reasoning and Quantitative Reasoning measures.
• See percentile ranks for scores in the Verbal Reasoning, Quantitative Reasoning and Analytical Writing measures.
To learn more about using GRE scores, download the
GRE® Guide to the Use of Scores at www.ets.org/gre/guide.
What to consider when using GRE scores
in general
Use multiple criteria, in addition to GRE scores,
when considering applicants
As part of the admissions process, it is recommended
that multiple sources of information be used to both
ensure fairness and balance the limitations of any single
measure of knowledge, skills or abilities.
These sources may include:
• Undergraduate grade-point average
• Letters of recommendation
• Personal statement
• Samples of academic work
• GRE® Subject Test scores, which measure achievement
in a particular field of study in eight subject areas
• TOEFL® scores, which measure the ability of nonnative
English speakers to use and understand the English
language as it is heard, spoken, read and written in the
university classroom
• ETS® Personal Potential Index Evaluation Reports,
which provide quantitative and qualitative feedback
from evaluators on six core personal attributes widely
recognized as essential for graduate-level success
Use the most recent percentile ranks when comparing
applicants from different GRE testing years
In addition to test scores, the GRE Program describes scores
in terms of their standing in appropriate reference groups. To
thatend,eachGREtestscoreisreportedwithacorresponding
percentile rank, which indicates the percentage of test takers
who received a lower score for that measure. Percentile
ranks are included in score concordance tables and on score
reports for easier comparison between applicants, and
are based on three years of performance data. The current
percentile ranks will be appropriate for use through June 2012.
Consider Verbal Reasoning, Quantitative Reasoning
and Analytical Writing scores as three separate and
independent measures
For each measure, the level of skills required for success
in graduate and business school varies by field or by
department. Scores for these measures should be
considered independently and should not be combined.
Avoid using cutoff scores when considering applicants
The use of multiple criteria as part of the admissions
process is important, so GRE scores should never be the
sole basis for an admissions decision. To that end, a cutoff
score below which applicants are categorically denied
admission without consideration is not recommended.
Plus, as with all standardized tests, the SEM means the score
may actually be a few points higher or lower than reported —
another reason why using a cutoff score is not advised.
Visit us online at www.ets.org/gre/institutions
Email us at GREhelpline@ets.org
Call the GRE Helpline at +1-609-683-2002
At ETS, we advance quality and equity in education for people worldwide by creating assessments
based on rigorous research. ETS serves individuals, educational institutions and government
agencies by providing customized solutions for teacher certification, English language learning, and
elementary, secondary and post-secondary education, as well as conducting education research,
analysis and policy studies. Founded as a nonprofit in 1947, ETS develops, administers and scores
more than 50 million tests annually — including the TOEFL® and TOEIC® tests, the GRE® tests and
The Praxis Series™ assessments — in more than 180 countries, at over 9,000 locations worldwide.
www.ets.org
Copyright © 2011 by Educational Testing Service. All rights reserved. ETS, the ETS logo, LISTENING. LEARNING. LEADING.,
GRE, TOEFL, TOEIC and SCORELINK are registered trademarks of Educational Testing Service (ETS). BETTER BY DESIGN and
THE PRAXIS SERIES are trademarks of ETS. GMAT is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council. ETS10317B
Learn more about the GRE® revised General Test.
765815

More Related Content

Similar to New Gre score scale brochure by ETS

Ofqual’s work on quality of marking
Ofqual’s work on quality of marking Ofqual’s work on quality of marking
Ofqual’s work on quality of marking
Ofqual Slideshare
 
gre_general_test_fall_20142020_oct_14.pptx
gre_general_test_fall_20142020_oct_14.pptxgre_general_test_fall_20142020_oct_14.pptx
gre_general_test_fall_20142020_oct_14.pptx
NubiaSanchezRodrigue
 
GRE
GREGRE
Scoring Sat Practice Test (1)
Scoring Sat Practice Test (1)Scoring Sat Practice Test (1)
Scoring Sat Practice Test (1)
RebecaJtiva
 
Va 101 ppt
Va 101 pptVa 101 ppt
ACT - September
ACT - SeptemberACT - September
ACT - September
Dylan Schuck
 
Data AnalysisResearch Report AssessmentBSB
Data AnalysisResearch Report AssessmentBSBData AnalysisResearch Report AssessmentBSB
Data AnalysisResearch Report AssessmentBSB
OllieShoresna
 
pm-pa.ppt
pm-pa.pptpm-pa.ppt
pm-pa.ppt
TahaReyan
 
k-12 grading outcome.pptx
k-12 grading outcome.pptxk-12 grading outcome.pptx
k-12 grading outcome.pptx
DjqueenRayonMacahilo
 
Understanding Assessments
Understanding AssessmentsUnderstanding Assessments
Understanding Assessments
Jenny Shotts
 
Aligning Benchmarks With High Stakes Assessments 2009
Aligning Benchmarks With High Stakes Assessments 2009Aligning Benchmarks With High Stakes Assessments 2009
Aligning Benchmarks With High Stakes Assessments 2009
dvodicka
 
Episode 8
Episode 8Episode 8
Episode 8
kenneth Clar
 
Galambos_SlidesNEAIR2015
Galambos_SlidesNEAIR2015Galambos_SlidesNEAIR2015
Galambos_SlidesNEAIR2015
Nora Galambos, PhD
 
Standard Four: Best Practices From Troy University
Standard Four: Best Practices From Troy University Standard Four: Best Practices From Troy University
Standard Four: Best Practices From Troy University
ACBSP Global Accreditation
 
Unit 1.2
Unit 1.2Unit 1.2
Unit 1.2
YUSUF ADENEYE
 
Survey report: Present the results with ready-made tables and charts
Survey report: Present the results with ready-made tables and chartsSurvey report: Present the results with ready-made tables and charts
Survey report: Present the results with ready-made tables and charts
Startquestion
 
Designing Pay Structure.pptx
Designing Pay Structure.pptxDesigning Pay Structure.pptx
Designing Pay Structure.pptx
Jerome Formalejo
 
Automated Trait Scores For GRE Writing Tasks
Automated Trait Scores For GRE   Writing TasksAutomated Trait Scores For GRE   Writing Tasks
Automated Trait Scores For GRE Writing Tasks
Kate Campbell
 
Interpreting Assessment and Reporting
Interpreting Assessment and ReportingInterpreting Assessment and Reporting
Interpreting Assessment and Reporting
cathy1991
 
PID3687979
PID3687979PID3687979
PID3687979
WAJID HUSSAIN
 

Similar to New Gre score scale brochure by ETS (20)

Ofqual’s work on quality of marking
Ofqual’s work on quality of marking Ofqual’s work on quality of marking
Ofqual’s work on quality of marking
 
gre_general_test_fall_20142020_oct_14.pptx
gre_general_test_fall_20142020_oct_14.pptxgre_general_test_fall_20142020_oct_14.pptx
gre_general_test_fall_20142020_oct_14.pptx
 
GRE
GREGRE
GRE
 
Scoring Sat Practice Test (1)
Scoring Sat Practice Test (1)Scoring Sat Practice Test (1)
Scoring Sat Practice Test (1)
 
Va 101 ppt
Va 101 pptVa 101 ppt
Va 101 ppt
 
ACT - September
ACT - SeptemberACT - September
ACT - September
 
Data AnalysisResearch Report AssessmentBSB
Data AnalysisResearch Report AssessmentBSBData AnalysisResearch Report AssessmentBSB
Data AnalysisResearch Report AssessmentBSB
 
pm-pa.ppt
pm-pa.pptpm-pa.ppt
pm-pa.ppt
 
k-12 grading outcome.pptx
k-12 grading outcome.pptxk-12 grading outcome.pptx
k-12 grading outcome.pptx
 
Understanding Assessments
Understanding AssessmentsUnderstanding Assessments
Understanding Assessments
 
Aligning Benchmarks With High Stakes Assessments 2009
Aligning Benchmarks With High Stakes Assessments 2009Aligning Benchmarks With High Stakes Assessments 2009
Aligning Benchmarks With High Stakes Assessments 2009
 
Episode 8
Episode 8Episode 8
Episode 8
 
Galambos_SlidesNEAIR2015
Galambos_SlidesNEAIR2015Galambos_SlidesNEAIR2015
Galambos_SlidesNEAIR2015
 
Standard Four: Best Practices From Troy University
Standard Four: Best Practices From Troy University Standard Four: Best Practices From Troy University
Standard Four: Best Practices From Troy University
 
Unit 1.2
Unit 1.2Unit 1.2
Unit 1.2
 
Survey report: Present the results with ready-made tables and charts
Survey report: Present the results with ready-made tables and chartsSurvey report: Present the results with ready-made tables and charts
Survey report: Present the results with ready-made tables and charts
 
Designing Pay Structure.pptx
Designing Pay Structure.pptxDesigning Pay Structure.pptx
Designing Pay Structure.pptx
 
Automated Trait Scores For GRE Writing Tasks
Automated Trait Scores For GRE   Writing TasksAutomated Trait Scores For GRE   Writing Tasks
Automated Trait Scores For GRE Writing Tasks
 
Interpreting Assessment and Reporting
Interpreting Assessment and ReportingInterpreting Assessment and Reporting
Interpreting Assessment and Reporting
 
PID3687979
PID3687979PID3687979
PID3687979
 

Recently uploaded

BBR 2024 Summer Sessions Interview Training
BBR  2024 Summer Sessions Interview TrainingBBR  2024 Summer Sessions Interview Training
BBR 2024 Summer Sessions Interview Training
Katrina Pritchard
 
Hindi varnamala | hindi alphabet PPT.pdf
Hindi varnamala | hindi alphabet PPT.pdfHindi varnamala | hindi alphabet PPT.pdf
Hindi varnamala | hindi alphabet PPT.pdf
Dr. Mulla Adam Ali
 
ANATOMY AND BIOMECHANICS OF HIP JOINT.pdf
ANATOMY AND BIOMECHANICS OF HIP JOINT.pdfANATOMY AND BIOMECHANICS OF HIP JOINT.pdf
ANATOMY AND BIOMECHANICS OF HIP JOINT.pdf
Priyankaranawat4
 
Philippine Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) Curriculum
Philippine Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) CurriculumPhilippine Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) Curriculum
Philippine Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) Curriculum
MJDuyan
 
RHEOLOGY Physical pharmaceutics-II notes for B.pharm 4th sem students
RHEOLOGY Physical pharmaceutics-II notes for B.pharm 4th sem studentsRHEOLOGY Physical pharmaceutics-II notes for B.pharm 4th sem students
RHEOLOGY Physical pharmaceutics-II notes for B.pharm 4th sem students
Himanshu Rai
 
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH 8 CẢ NĂM - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 (CÓ FI...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH 8 CẢ NĂM - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 (CÓ FI...BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH 8 CẢ NĂM - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 (CÓ FI...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH 8 CẢ NĂM - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 (CÓ FI...
Nguyen Thanh Tu Collection
 
MARY JANE WILSON, A “BOA MÃE” .
MARY JANE WILSON, A “BOA MÃE”           .MARY JANE WILSON, A “BOA MÃE”           .
MARY JANE WILSON, A “BOA MÃE” .
Colégio Santa Teresinha
 
Gender and Mental Health - Counselling and Family Therapy Applications and In...
Gender and Mental Health - Counselling and Family Therapy Applications and In...Gender and Mental Health - Counselling and Family Therapy Applications and In...
Gender and Mental Health - Counselling and Family Therapy Applications and In...
PsychoTech Services
 
Temple of Asclepius in Thrace. Excavation results
Temple of Asclepius in Thrace. Excavation resultsTemple of Asclepius in Thrace. Excavation results
Temple of Asclepius in Thrace. Excavation results
Krassimira Luka
 
Film vocab for eal 3 students: Australia the movie
Film vocab for eal 3 students: Australia the movieFilm vocab for eal 3 students: Australia the movie
Film vocab for eal 3 students: Australia the movie
Nicholas Montgomery
 
ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, and GDPR: Best Practices for Implementation and...
ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, and GDPR: Best Practices for Implementation and...ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, and GDPR: Best Practices for Implementation and...
ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, and GDPR: Best Practices for Implementation and...
PECB
 
IGCSE Biology Chapter 14- Reproduction in Plants.pdf
IGCSE Biology Chapter 14- Reproduction in Plants.pdfIGCSE Biology Chapter 14- Reproduction in Plants.pdf
IGCSE Biology Chapter 14- Reproduction in Plants.pdf
Amin Marwan
 
Leveraging Generative AI to Drive Nonprofit Innovation
Leveraging Generative AI to Drive Nonprofit InnovationLeveraging Generative AI to Drive Nonprofit Innovation
Leveraging Generative AI to Drive Nonprofit Innovation
TechSoup
 
Main Java[All of the Base Concepts}.docx
Main Java[All of the Base Concepts}.docxMain Java[All of the Base Concepts}.docx
Main Java[All of the Base Concepts}.docx
adhitya5119
 
বাংলাদেশ অর্থনৈতিক সমীক্ষা (Economic Review) ২০২৪ UJS App.pdf
বাংলাদেশ অর্থনৈতিক সমীক্ষা (Economic Review) ২০২৪ UJS App.pdfবাংলাদেশ অর্থনৈতিক সমীক্ষা (Economic Review) ২০২৪ UJS App.pdf
বাংলাদেশ অর্থনৈতিক সমীক্ষা (Economic Review) ২০২৪ UJS App.pdf
eBook.com.bd (প্রয়োজনীয় বাংলা বই)
 
How to Create a More Engaging and Human Online Learning Experience
How to Create a More Engaging and Human Online Learning Experience How to Create a More Engaging and Human Online Learning Experience
How to Create a More Engaging and Human Online Learning Experience
Wahiba Chair Training & Consulting
 
Pengantar Penggunaan Flutter - Dart programming language1.pptx
Pengantar Penggunaan Flutter - Dart programming language1.pptxPengantar Penggunaan Flutter - Dart programming language1.pptx
Pengantar Penggunaan Flutter - Dart programming language1.pptx
Fajar Baskoro
 
spot a liar (Haiqa 146).pptx Technical writhing and presentation skills
spot a liar (Haiqa 146).pptx Technical writhing and presentation skillsspot a liar (Haiqa 146).pptx Technical writhing and presentation skills
spot a liar (Haiqa 146).pptx Technical writhing and presentation skills
haiqairshad
 
คำศัพท์ คำพื้นฐานการอ่าน ภาษาอังกฤษ ระดับชั้น ม.1
คำศัพท์ คำพื้นฐานการอ่าน ภาษาอังกฤษ ระดับชั้น ม.1คำศัพท์ คำพื้นฐานการอ่าน ภาษาอังกฤษ ระดับชั้น ม.1
คำศัพท์ คำพื้นฐานการอ่าน ภาษาอังกฤษ ระดับชั้น ม.1
สมใจ จันสุกสี
 
How to deliver Powerpoint Presentations.pptx
How to deliver Powerpoint  Presentations.pptxHow to deliver Powerpoint  Presentations.pptx
How to deliver Powerpoint Presentations.pptx
HajraNaeem15
 

Recently uploaded (20)

BBR 2024 Summer Sessions Interview Training
BBR  2024 Summer Sessions Interview TrainingBBR  2024 Summer Sessions Interview Training
BBR 2024 Summer Sessions Interview Training
 
Hindi varnamala | hindi alphabet PPT.pdf
Hindi varnamala | hindi alphabet PPT.pdfHindi varnamala | hindi alphabet PPT.pdf
Hindi varnamala | hindi alphabet PPT.pdf
 
ANATOMY AND BIOMECHANICS OF HIP JOINT.pdf
ANATOMY AND BIOMECHANICS OF HIP JOINT.pdfANATOMY AND BIOMECHANICS OF HIP JOINT.pdf
ANATOMY AND BIOMECHANICS OF HIP JOINT.pdf
 
Philippine Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) Curriculum
Philippine Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) CurriculumPhilippine Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) Curriculum
Philippine Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) Curriculum
 
RHEOLOGY Physical pharmaceutics-II notes for B.pharm 4th sem students
RHEOLOGY Physical pharmaceutics-II notes for B.pharm 4th sem studentsRHEOLOGY Physical pharmaceutics-II notes for B.pharm 4th sem students
RHEOLOGY Physical pharmaceutics-II notes for B.pharm 4th sem students
 
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH 8 CẢ NĂM - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 (CÓ FI...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH 8 CẢ NĂM - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 (CÓ FI...BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH 8 CẢ NĂM - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 (CÓ FI...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH 8 CẢ NĂM - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 (CÓ FI...
 
MARY JANE WILSON, A “BOA MÃE” .
MARY JANE WILSON, A “BOA MÃE”           .MARY JANE WILSON, A “BOA MÃE”           .
MARY JANE WILSON, A “BOA MÃE” .
 
Gender and Mental Health - Counselling and Family Therapy Applications and In...
Gender and Mental Health - Counselling and Family Therapy Applications and In...Gender and Mental Health - Counselling and Family Therapy Applications and In...
Gender and Mental Health - Counselling and Family Therapy Applications and In...
 
Temple of Asclepius in Thrace. Excavation results
Temple of Asclepius in Thrace. Excavation resultsTemple of Asclepius in Thrace. Excavation results
Temple of Asclepius in Thrace. Excavation results
 
Film vocab for eal 3 students: Australia the movie
Film vocab for eal 3 students: Australia the movieFilm vocab for eal 3 students: Australia the movie
Film vocab for eal 3 students: Australia the movie
 
ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, and GDPR: Best Practices for Implementation and...
ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, and GDPR: Best Practices for Implementation and...ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, and GDPR: Best Practices for Implementation and...
ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, and GDPR: Best Practices for Implementation and...
 
IGCSE Biology Chapter 14- Reproduction in Plants.pdf
IGCSE Biology Chapter 14- Reproduction in Plants.pdfIGCSE Biology Chapter 14- Reproduction in Plants.pdf
IGCSE Biology Chapter 14- Reproduction in Plants.pdf
 
Leveraging Generative AI to Drive Nonprofit Innovation
Leveraging Generative AI to Drive Nonprofit InnovationLeveraging Generative AI to Drive Nonprofit Innovation
Leveraging Generative AI to Drive Nonprofit Innovation
 
Main Java[All of the Base Concepts}.docx
Main Java[All of the Base Concepts}.docxMain Java[All of the Base Concepts}.docx
Main Java[All of the Base Concepts}.docx
 
বাংলাদেশ অর্থনৈতিক সমীক্ষা (Economic Review) ২০২৪ UJS App.pdf
বাংলাদেশ অর্থনৈতিক সমীক্ষা (Economic Review) ২০২৪ UJS App.pdfবাংলাদেশ অর্থনৈতিক সমীক্ষা (Economic Review) ২০২৪ UJS App.pdf
বাংলাদেশ অর্থনৈতিক সমীক্ষা (Economic Review) ২০২৪ UJS App.pdf
 
How to Create a More Engaging and Human Online Learning Experience
How to Create a More Engaging and Human Online Learning Experience How to Create a More Engaging and Human Online Learning Experience
How to Create a More Engaging and Human Online Learning Experience
 
Pengantar Penggunaan Flutter - Dart programming language1.pptx
Pengantar Penggunaan Flutter - Dart programming language1.pptxPengantar Penggunaan Flutter - Dart programming language1.pptx
Pengantar Penggunaan Flutter - Dart programming language1.pptx
 
spot a liar (Haiqa 146).pptx Technical writhing and presentation skills
spot a liar (Haiqa 146).pptx Technical writhing and presentation skillsspot a liar (Haiqa 146).pptx Technical writhing and presentation skills
spot a liar (Haiqa 146).pptx Technical writhing and presentation skills
 
คำศัพท์ คำพื้นฐานการอ่าน ภาษาอังกฤษ ระดับชั้น ม.1
คำศัพท์ คำพื้นฐานการอ่าน ภาษาอังกฤษ ระดับชั้น ม.1คำศัพท์ คำพื้นฐานการอ่าน ภาษาอังกฤษ ระดับชั้น ม.1
คำศัพท์ คำพื้นฐานการอ่าน ภาษาอังกฤษ ระดับชั้น ม.1
 
How to deliver Powerpoint Presentations.pptx
How to deliver Powerpoint  Presentations.pptxHow to deliver Powerpoint  Presentations.pptx
How to deliver Powerpoint Presentations.pptx
 

New Gre score scale brochure by ETS

  • 1. Inside: • An in-depth look at the new 130 – 170 score scales • Guidance on making the transition to the new score scales • Helpful considerations when using GRE® scores A helpful overview of what you need to know The new Verbal Reasoning and Quantitative Reasoning score scales: Better by Design™
  • 2. Using the new score scales: Here’s a quick review of the new score scales: • Verbal Reasoning scores are reported on a 130 – 170 score scale, in one-point increments (the prior 200 – 800 score scale was reported in 10-point increments). • Quantitative Reasoning scores are reported on a 130 – 170 score scale, in one-point increments (the prior 200 – 800 score scale was reported in 10-point increments). • Analytical Writing scores are reported on the 0 – 6 score scale, in half-point increments. How the new score scales provide clearer differentiation The 41-point score scales were selected to reflect the changes in content, test length and the new psychometric model of the GRE revised General Test. In setting the new score scales, one goal was to have scores spread out across the entire range of possible scores. For example, in the case of the Quantitative Reasoning scale, this will reduce the portion of test takers’ scores that are “bunched” at the upper end of the scale — as has been the case in the past — providing better differentiation between top-scoring applicants. Why one-point increments lead to better decisions Scores in the Verbal Reasoning and Quantitative Reasoning measures are reported in one-point increments, making it easier for you to distinguish performance differences between your applicants. For example, a 500 and a 520 on the prior Verbal Reasoning score scale created the impression that there was a bigger difference in ability than there actually was. But by reporting in one-point increments, a 150 and 152, for example, demonstrate small differences. Now small score differences are less likely to be interpreted as meaningful when comparing applicants — and larger score differences will stand out more clearly. How they provide more simplicity in comparing applicants. The GRE® revised General Test was introduced in August 2011, making the most trusted assessment of graduate-level skills even better — for you, and for your potential students. With new question types and the new test-taker friendly design, the GRE revised General Test also features new score scales for the Verbal Reasoning and Quantitative Reasoning measures. These new score scales will help you make more meaningful comparisons between applicants — and even better admissions decisions for your program.
  • 3. Scaled Score Percent of Examinees Scoring Lower than Selected Scaled Scores Verbal Reasoning Quantitative Reasoning 160 86 84 159 84 82 158 79 79 157 77 77 156 72 74 155 69 69 154 64 67 153 62 65 152 56 61 151 51 56 150 48 53 149 42 49 148 40 44 147 36 40 146 31 36 145 28 32 144 26 26 143 21 22 142 18 19 141 16 16 140 13 12 139 10 10 Percentile Ranks: A valuable source of information Percentile ranks are very helpful when comparing scores on the prior and new tests because they’re indicative of how well the test taker performed in relation to other test takers. Here’s how: • A percentile rank for a score indicates the percentage of test takers who took the test and received a lower score. • They’re based on the performance of the current reference group from a recent three-year period.* • The reference group is updated every year, which means the percentile rank for any score may vary slightly over the years. *July1,2007-June30,2010. Thecurrentpercentileranks will beappropriateforusethrough June2012. A Sample of the Percentile Ranks Table Based on the performances of examinees who tested between July 1, 2007 and June 30, 2010. To view the complete Percentile Ranks table, go to www.ets.org/gre/percentile. To learn more about using GRE scores, download the GRE® Guide to the Use of Scores at www.ets.org/gre/guide.
  • 4. Since GRE® scores are valid for five years, these concordance tables will help you understand the relationship between scores on the new 130 – 170 score scales and scores on the prior 200 – 800 score scales — making it easier for you to compare candidates. Percentile ranks are also included on the concordance tables for your convenience. A sample portion of each concordance table is shown to the right. For business schools: The easy-to-use GRE® Comparison Tool The GRE Comparison Tool places GRE scores in the context of GMAT® Total scores, so business schools that are more familiar with GMAT scores can understand and appropriately interpret GRE scores. • This online tool calculates a predicted GMAT Total score based on an applicant’s GRE Verbal Reasoning and Quantitative Reasoning scores. • You can calculate an estimated GMAT Total score by entering GRE scores on either the 130 – 170 score scales or the 200 – 800 score scales. Try it now at www.ets.org/gre/comparison. To help you more easily transition to using scores on the new score scales, we’ve created two concordance tables — one for the Verbal Reasoning measure and one for the Quantitative Reasoning measure. Comparing applicants: Using concordance tables to get familiar with the new score scales.
  • 5. A Sample of the Verbal Reasoning Concordance Table For use November 1, 2011 - June 30, 2012 A Sample of the Quantitative Reasoning Concordance Table For use November 1, 2011 - June 30, 2012 650 163 93 640 162 90 630 162 90 620 161 89 610 160 86 600 160 86 590 159 84 580 158 79 570 158 79 560 157 77 550 156 72 540 156 72 530 155 69 520 154 64 510 154 64 500 153 62 490 152 56 650 151 56 640 151 56 630 150 53 620 149 49 610 149 49 600 148 44 590 148 44 580 147 40 570 147 40 560 146 36 550 146 36 540 145 32 530 145 32 520 144 26 510 144 26 500 144 26 490 143 22 Scores on the Prior Scale EstimatedScores on the Current Scale % Rank Scores on the Prior Scale EstimatedScores on the Current Scale % Rank View the complete Verbal Reasoning and Quantitative Reasoning concordance tables at www.ets.org/gre/concordance. To learn more about using GRE scores, download the GRE® Guide to the Use of Scores at www.ets.org/gre/guide.
  • 6. Here’s a closer look: • Score reports for those who tested on or after August 1, 2011 show Verbal Reasoning and Quantitative Reasoning scores on the new 130 – 170 score scales, in one-point increments. • Score reports for those who tested before August 1, 2011 show scores originally earned on the 200 – 800 score scales, along with corresponding estimated scores on the new 130 – 170 score scales. • All score reports show the Analytical Writing measure scores based on the 0 – 6 score scale, in half-point increments. • All score reports show one set of percentile ranks for each measure, which indicate how the applicant performed in comparison to the reference group from a recent three-year period. Plus: • You will also receive the test taker’s email address, phone number, intended graduate major and more. • New paper score reports feature the ETS® Security Guard — a special heat-sensitive ink that, when activated, verifies the report’s authenticity. For your convenience, GRE® score reports are available in these formats: • paper reports • electronic score files via SCORELINK® Internet Delivery Service • electronic score files on CD-ROM The new score report: Redesigned to give you more information about applicants. To learn about receiving scores via the SCORELINK service, the fastest method of score reporting, go to www.ets.org/gre/scorelink.
  • 7. Estimated scores on the current scale for administrations before August 2011. New test-taker information including email address, telephone number and intended graduate major. Special heat-sensitive ink for added security. Scores on the prior scale for administrations before August 2011. Percentile ranks based on the most recent three-year period. Scores on the current scale for administrations in August 2011 or later. To learn more about using GRE scores, download the GRE® Guide to the Use of Scores at www.ets.org/gre/guide.
  • 8. One of the most significant enhancements introduced with the GRE® revised General Test is the advanced technology of the new Multi-Stage Test (MST) design. With the MST design, the Verbal Reasoning and Quantitative Reasoning measures of the computer-based test are now adaptive at the section level. Here’s what that means for scoring: • Each measure has two operational sections; the computer selects the second section of a measure based on the test taker’s performance on the first section. • Within each section, all questions contribute equally to the final score. • For each of the two measures, a raw score is computed, which is based on the number of questions answered correctly. • The raw score is then converted to a scaled score through a process called equating, which accounts for GRE® scores: A look at how the test is scored. minor variations in difficulty among the different test editions as well as differences in difficulty among individuals’ tests introduced by the section-level adaptation. This means a given scaled score reflects approximately the same level of performance — regardless of which section was selected and when the test was taken. To learn more about scoring of the computer-based and paper-based test for all three measures — Verbal Reasoning, Quantitative Reasoning and Analytical Writing — visit www.ets.org/gre/aboutscores.
  • 9. As graduate and business school programs around the world become familiar with the new score scales, it’s a good time to reflect on the benefits of using GRE scores. For more than 60 years, the GRE General Test has been a valid predictor of success at the graduate level. With its introduction in August 2011, the GRE revised General Test continues to: • assess the skills that graduate and business school programs value — verbal reasoning, quantitative reasoning, critical thinking and analytical writing. • provide a common measure for comparing applicants with differing educational and cultural backgrounds. • furnish independent information to supplement the evaluation of grades and recommendations. • provide access to a broad, diverse pool of highly qualified applicants interested in pursuing an advanced degree. A look at how scores are helpful in the admissions process. To learn more about using GRE scores, download the GRE® Guide to the Use of Scores at www.ets.org/gre/guide.
  • 10. As you become familiar with the new score scales and score report, now is also a good time to review best practices for evaluating applicants’ scores. Following these guidelines will help you make the best decisions for your program. What to keep in mind when using the new score scales Make the transition to the new 130 – 170 score scales Departments and programs that accept GRE® scores are encouraged to transition from using the prior score scales to using the new score scales. To make the transition, you are encouraged to use scores from the prior test that are converted to the new 130 – 170 score scales based on the concordance tables — as well as the actual scores from test takers who took the GRE revised General Test. It is not recommended to take the new score scales and revert to the prior score scales. Use concordance information to transition to the new score scales Concordance tables show the relationship between the scores on the prior score scales and new score scales. These tables may be appropriately used for translating an institution’s historical guidelines for GRE scores on the prior score scales to the new score scales. Using the tables in this way should result in the selection of approximately the same proportion of students. It’s important to note that the scores in the concordance tables are approximations, not equivalences, and that a test taker who has a particular score on the prior scale would not necessarily obtain the exact concorded score if they had taken the GRE revised General Test. Score users should use special care in evaluating test takers who received a Quantitative Reasoning score at the top end of the prior 200 – 800 score scale. Now, with the new 130 – 170 score scale, we can provide more differentiation for higher ability test takers. However, test takers who took the prior test and received an 800 on the Quantitative Reasoning measure received the highest score possible that they were able to earn on the measure. Therefore, this information should be considered when making admissions decisions. Refrain from making decisions based on small score differences One benefit of moving to one-point increments is that small score differences are less likely to be interpreted as meaningful differences. That’s why it’s recommended that small differences in GRE scores not be used to make distinctions among applicants. Another thing to consider: With all standardized tests — including the prior GRE General Test — there’s a standard error of measurement (SEM). The SEM of the difference between scores should be taken into account when comparing applicants’ scores on the same measure, because this means a score in a measure may actually be a few points higher or lower than reported. SEMs vary by test; the SEMs for GRE tests are available in the GRE® Guide to the Use of Scores, which you can download at www.ets.org/gre/guide. Best practices: HelpfulguidelinesforusingGRE® scoresinyouradmissionsprocess.
  • 11. Other resources to help you make the transition to the new score scales Visit www.ets.org/gre/infocenter to: • Register for an upcoming webinar, featuring live QA session with GRE measurement experts. • Sign up for our eUpdate newsletter to receive updates and stay informed about the GRE revised General Test. Plus, go to www.ets.org/gre/scoring to: • Review concordance tables for the Verbal Reasoning and Quantitative Reasoning measures. • See percentile ranks for scores in the Verbal Reasoning, Quantitative Reasoning and Analytical Writing measures. To learn more about using GRE scores, download the GRE® Guide to the Use of Scores at www.ets.org/gre/guide. What to consider when using GRE scores in general Use multiple criteria, in addition to GRE scores, when considering applicants As part of the admissions process, it is recommended that multiple sources of information be used to both ensure fairness and balance the limitations of any single measure of knowledge, skills or abilities. These sources may include: • Undergraduate grade-point average • Letters of recommendation • Personal statement • Samples of academic work • GRE® Subject Test scores, which measure achievement in a particular field of study in eight subject areas • TOEFL® scores, which measure the ability of nonnative English speakers to use and understand the English language as it is heard, spoken, read and written in the university classroom • ETS® Personal Potential Index Evaluation Reports, which provide quantitative and qualitative feedback from evaluators on six core personal attributes widely recognized as essential for graduate-level success Use the most recent percentile ranks when comparing applicants from different GRE testing years In addition to test scores, the GRE Program describes scores in terms of their standing in appropriate reference groups. To thatend,eachGREtestscoreisreportedwithacorresponding percentile rank, which indicates the percentage of test takers who received a lower score for that measure. Percentile ranks are included in score concordance tables and on score reports for easier comparison between applicants, and are based on three years of performance data. The current percentile ranks will be appropriate for use through June 2012. Consider Verbal Reasoning, Quantitative Reasoning and Analytical Writing scores as three separate and independent measures For each measure, the level of skills required for success in graduate and business school varies by field or by department. Scores for these measures should be considered independently and should not be combined. Avoid using cutoff scores when considering applicants The use of multiple criteria as part of the admissions process is important, so GRE scores should never be the sole basis for an admissions decision. To that end, a cutoff score below which applicants are categorically denied admission without consideration is not recommended. Plus, as with all standardized tests, the SEM means the score may actually be a few points higher or lower than reported — another reason why using a cutoff score is not advised.
  • 12. Visit us online at www.ets.org/gre/institutions Email us at GREhelpline@ets.org Call the GRE Helpline at +1-609-683-2002 At ETS, we advance quality and equity in education for people worldwide by creating assessments based on rigorous research. ETS serves individuals, educational institutions and government agencies by providing customized solutions for teacher certification, English language learning, and elementary, secondary and post-secondary education, as well as conducting education research, analysis and policy studies. Founded as a nonprofit in 1947, ETS develops, administers and scores more than 50 million tests annually — including the TOEFL® and TOEIC® tests, the GRE® tests and The Praxis Series™ assessments — in more than 180 countries, at over 9,000 locations worldwide. www.ets.org Copyright © 2011 by Educational Testing Service. All rights reserved. ETS, the ETS logo, LISTENING. LEARNING. LEADING., GRE, TOEFL, TOEIC and SCORELINK are registered trademarks of Educational Testing Service (ETS). BETTER BY DESIGN and THE PRAXIS SERIES are trademarks of ETS. GMAT is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council. ETS10317B Learn more about the GRE® revised General Test. 765815