Google has launched an online form to comply with a recent European Union court ruling requiring search engines to provide a way for people to request the removal of certain links from search results. The form allows EU residents to petition Google to remove specific URLs from search results by providing their name, email, photo ID and URLs to be removed. Google will review each request individually to balance privacy rights and public access to information, and will not necessarily remove all information, such as details about crimes or financial scams.
SECTION D PrivacyCase 8 Google and the Right to Be Forgott.docxrtodd280
SECTION D Privacy
Case 8 Google and the Right to Be Forgotten1
Cynthia E. Clark
Bentley University
In 2009, Mario Costeja Gonzalez, a self-employed attorney living in a small town outside Madrid, Spain, casually “googled” himself and was startled by what came up on his computer screen. Prominently displayed in the search results was a brief legal notice that had appeared more than a decade earlier in a local newspaper, La Vanguardia, which listed property seized and being auctioned by a government agency for nonpayments of debts. Among the properties was a home jointly owned by Costeja and his wife.
Costeja immediately realized that this information could damage his reputation as an attorney. Equally troubling, the information was no longer factual. He had paid his debt nearly a decade earlier. Abanlex, Costeja’s small law firm, depended on the Internet to gain much of its new business, which was often generated by a Google search. Potential clients might choose not to hire him based on the old auction notice, he reflected. His mind then turned to the possible effects of this kind of information on other people’s livelihoods. “There are people who cannot get a job because of content that is irrelevant,” he thought.2 “I support freedom of expression and I do not defend censorship. [However, I decided] to fight for the right to request the deletion of data that violates the honor, dignity and reputation of individuals.”3
The next week, Costeja wrote to La Vanguardia and requested that it remove the article about his debt notice, because it had had been fully resolved a number of years earlier and reference to it now was, therefore, entirely irrelevant.4 In doing so, he was making use of his rights under Spain’s strong data protection policies, which recognized the protection and integrity of personal data as a constitutional right under Section 18 of the nation’s Data Protection Act.5 In response, the newspaper informed him that it had recently uploaded to the Internet all its past archives, dating back to 1881, to allow them to be searched by the public. It also noted that the auction notice had originally been publicly posted in order to secure as many bidders as possible. The newspaper refused Costeja’s request, stating that the information was obtained from public records and had thus been published lawfully.6
To be sure, the real problem for Costeja was not that the notice had appeared in La Vanguardia’s digital library, but that it had shown up in the results of the most widely used search engine in the world, Google, where potential clients might use it to judge his character.7 Following this reasoning, Costeja then wrote to Google Spain, the firm’s Spanish affiliate, only to be told that the parent company, Google Inc., was the entity responsible for the development of search results.8 Costeja was taken aback by this development. “The resources Google has at their disposal aren’t like those of any other citizens,” he reflected.9 Cost.
SECTION D PrivacyCase 8 Google and the Right to Be Forgott.docxrtodd280
SECTION D Privacy
Case 8 Google and the Right to Be Forgotten1
Cynthia E. Clark
Bentley University
In 2009, Mario Costeja Gonzalez, a self-employed attorney living in a small town outside Madrid, Spain, casually “googled” himself and was startled by what came up on his computer screen. Prominently displayed in the search results was a brief legal notice that had appeared more than a decade earlier in a local newspaper, La Vanguardia, which listed property seized and being auctioned by a government agency for nonpayments of debts. Among the properties was a home jointly owned by Costeja and his wife.
Costeja immediately realized that this information could damage his reputation as an attorney. Equally troubling, the information was no longer factual. He had paid his debt nearly a decade earlier. Abanlex, Costeja’s small law firm, depended on the Internet to gain much of its new business, which was often generated by a Google search. Potential clients might choose not to hire him based on the old auction notice, he reflected. His mind then turned to the possible effects of this kind of information on other people’s livelihoods. “There are people who cannot get a job because of content that is irrelevant,” he thought.2 “I support freedom of expression and I do not defend censorship. [However, I decided] to fight for the right to request the deletion of data that violates the honor, dignity and reputation of individuals.”3
The next week, Costeja wrote to La Vanguardia and requested that it remove the article about his debt notice, because it had had been fully resolved a number of years earlier and reference to it now was, therefore, entirely irrelevant.4 In doing so, he was making use of his rights under Spain’s strong data protection policies, which recognized the protection and integrity of personal data as a constitutional right under Section 18 of the nation’s Data Protection Act.5 In response, the newspaper informed him that it had recently uploaded to the Internet all its past archives, dating back to 1881, to allow them to be searched by the public. It also noted that the auction notice had originally been publicly posted in order to secure as many bidders as possible. The newspaper refused Costeja’s request, stating that the information was obtained from public records and had thus been published lawfully.6
To be sure, the real problem for Costeja was not that the notice had appeared in La Vanguardia’s digital library, but that it had shown up in the results of the most widely used search engine in the world, Google, where potential clients might use it to judge his character.7 Following this reasoning, Costeja then wrote to Google Spain, the firm’s Spanish affiliate, only to be told that the parent company, Google Inc., was the entity responsible for the development of search results.8 Costeja was taken aback by this development. “The resources Google has at their disposal aren’t like those of any other citizens,” he reflected.9 Cost.
The removal of a russian app raises new concerns for apple and googleaditi agarwal
The app in query, referred to as Smart Voting, became a tool for establishing competition to Russia President Vladimir Putin beforehand of elections held over the weekend.
Is it safe to share your location on Foursquare, Gowalla, Facebook, Twitter? Shouldn't we all share more, since only wrongdoers have something to hide? Is it even possible to opt out of sharing in a connected society?
The Firecat Studio First Friday Coworking and Brownbag lunch topic of May, 2011 covered these examples and currently proposed legislation.
United Kingdom GDPR Action Taken Against Canadian CompanyBarry Schuman
Recently, the UK Information Commissioner’s Office (“ICO”), a non-governmental public body which serves as the independent regulatory office concerning data protection, decided to take action in the form of an enforcement notice issued on July 6, 2018, against a non-European entity following a purported breach of the GDPR.
Save paper and follow @newyorker on TwitterAnnals of Law.docxanhlodge
Save paper and follow @newyorker on Twitter
Annals of Law
SEPTEMBER 29, 2014 ISSUE
The Solace of Oblivion
In Europe, the right to be forgotten trumps the Internet.
BY JEFFREY TOOBIN
O
The European Court ruled that Google must delete certain links that violate privacy.
ILLUSTRATION BY JAVIER JAÉN
n October 31, 2006, an eighteen-year-old woman named Nikki
Catsouras slammed her father’s sports car into the side of a
concrete toll booth in Orange County, California. Catsouras was
decapitated in the accident. The California Highway Patrol, following
standard protocol, secured the scene and took photographs. The
manner of death was so horrific that the local coroner did not allow
Nikki’s parents to identify her body.
“About two weeks after the accident, I got a call from my brother-in-
law,” Christos Catsouras, Nikki’s father, told me. “He said he had
heard from a neighbor that the photos from the crash were circulating
on the Internet. We asked the C.H.P., and they said they would look
into it.” In short order, two employees admitted that they had shared
the photographs. As summarized in a later court filing, the employees
had “e-mailed nine gruesome death images to their friends and family
members on Halloween—for pure shock value. Once received, the
photographs were forwarded to others, and thus spread across the
Internet like a malignant firestorm, popping up on thousands of Web
sites.”
Already bereft of his eldest daughter, Catsouras told his three other
girls that they couldn’t look at the Internet. “But, other than that,
people told me there was nothing I could do,” he recalled. “They said,
‘Don’t worry. It’ll blow over.’ ” Nevertheless, Catsouras embarked on a
modern legal quest: to remove information from the Internet. In
recent years, many people have made the same kind of effort, from
actors who don’t want their private photographs in broad circulation
to ex-convicts who don’t want their long-ago legal troubles to prevent
them from finding jobs. Despite the varied circumstances, all these
people want something that does not exist in the United States: the
right to be forgotten.
The situation is different in Europe, thanks to a court case that was
decided earlier this year. In 1998, a Spanish newspaper called La
Vanguardia published two small notices stating that certain property
owned by a lawyer named Mario Costeja González was going to be
auctioned to pay off his debts. Costeja cleared up the financial
difficulties, but the newspaper records continued to surface whenever
anyone Googled his name. In 2010, Costeja went to Spanish
authorities to demand that the newspaper remove the items from its
Web site and that Google remove the links from searches for his
name. The Spanish Data Protection Agency, which is the local
representative of a Continent-wide network of computer-privacy
regulators, denied the claim against La Vanguardia but granted the
claim against Google. This spring, the European Court of Justice,
which operates.
THIS PRESENTATION IS ALL ABOUT GOOGLE. THIS PRESENTATION GIVES YOU THE GLIMPSE OF GOOGLE FROM IT'S PAST TO PRESENT .
___________________________________________________
follow me for more awesome presentation on interesting topics
@Bhavesh Singh
5 7As globalization continues to transform the world o.docxtarifarmarie
5 7
As globalization continues to transform the world
of business, companies that decide to expand into other
countries are faced with many challenges. The markets in
developing nations hold great promise; however, any com-
pany that wishes to operate in them must often overcome
both relatively minor problems, such as dealing with cul-
tural differences, as well as larger problems, such as serious
human rights abuses. Google, the world’s largest internet
company, has to contend with both cultural differences
and human rights abuses while operating in China. An
analysis of Google’s actions in China shows how creative
solutions can be found to complex ethical problems.
The challenges Google has faced in China primarily
stem from the Chinese government’s controversial policy
of censoring the internet. Censorship is currently enacted
through what is officially known as the Golden Shield
Project; however, in the West it is more often referred to
by its unofficial nickname, the Great Firewall of China.
This policy was enacted in 1998 and has drawn much
criticism from Western governments and human rights
organizations like Amnesty International and Reporters
Without Borders (Clinton 2010; Amnesty International
2006; Reporters Without Borders 2009). Despite inter-
national pressure, the Chinese government adamantly
supports the censorship, and in early 2010 it released a
white paper addressing internet freedoms in China. In
the white paper, the government spelled out its official
policy, which is to block:
[Anything] against the cardinal principles set
forth in the Constitution; endangering state secu-
rity, divulging state secrets, subverting state power
and jeopardizing national unification; damaging
state honor and interests; instigating ethnic hatred
or discrimination and jeopardizing ethnic unity;
jeopardizing state religious policy, propagating
heretical or superstitious ideas; spreading rumors,
disrupting social order and stability; disseminat-
ing obscenity, pornography, gambling, violence,
brutality and terror or abetting crime; humiliat-
ing or slandering others, trespassing on the lawful
rights and interests of others; and other contents
forbidden by laws and administrative regulations.
(Information Office of the State Council 2010)
This policy is clearly broad enough that it gives China’s
Ministry of Public Security the power to block anything
it wants.
The Chinese government often uses this power to
quench criticism and suppress information about human
rights abuses (Amnesty International 2006). In order to
enforce the policy, China employs tens of thousands of
people to monitor forums, chat rooms, and bulletin boards.
It also filters all internet traffic coming into China from
other countries and requires all internet companies in
China to self-censor their content (Elgin and Einhorn
2006). Despite all of this, the Chinese government insists
that “Chinese citizens fully enjoy freedom .
The internet is reshaping its form for privacy as the 350 billion dollar digi...aditi agarwal
As Apple and Google enact privateness modifications, businesses are grappling with the fallout, Madison Avenue is preventing returned and Facebook has cried foul
The removal of a russian app raises new concerns for apple and googleaditi agarwal
The app in query, referred to as Smart Voting, became a tool for establishing competition to Russia President Vladimir Putin beforehand of elections held over the weekend.
Is it safe to share your location on Foursquare, Gowalla, Facebook, Twitter? Shouldn't we all share more, since only wrongdoers have something to hide? Is it even possible to opt out of sharing in a connected society?
The Firecat Studio First Friday Coworking and Brownbag lunch topic of May, 2011 covered these examples and currently proposed legislation.
United Kingdom GDPR Action Taken Against Canadian CompanyBarry Schuman
Recently, the UK Information Commissioner’s Office (“ICO”), a non-governmental public body which serves as the independent regulatory office concerning data protection, decided to take action in the form of an enforcement notice issued on July 6, 2018, against a non-European entity following a purported breach of the GDPR.
Save paper and follow @newyorker on TwitterAnnals of Law.docxanhlodge
Save paper and follow @newyorker on Twitter
Annals of Law
SEPTEMBER 29, 2014 ISSUE
The Solace of Oblivion
In Europe, the right to be forgotten trumps the Internet.
BY JEFFREY TOOBIN
O
The European Court ruled that Google must delete certain links that violate privacy.
ILLUSTRATION BY JAVIER JAÉN
n October 31, 2006, an eighteen-year-old woman named Nikki
Catsouras slammed her father’s sports car into the side of a
concrete toll booth in Orange County, California. Catsouras was
decapitated in the accident. The California Highway Patrol, following
standard protocol, secured the scene and took photographs. The
manner of death was so horrific that the local coroner did not allow
Nikki’s parents to identify her body.
“About two weeks after the accident, I got a call from my brother-in-
law,” Christos Catsouras, Nikki’s father, told me. “He said he had
heard from a neighbor that the photos from the crash were circulating
on the Internet. We asked the C.H.P., and they said they would look
into it.” In short order, two employees admitted that they had shared
the photographs. As summarized in a later court filing, the employees
had “e-mailed nine gruesome death images to their friends and family
members on Halloween—for pure shock value. Once received, the
photographs were forwarded to others, and thus spread across the
Internet like a malignant firestorm, popping up on thousands of Web
sites.”
Already bereft of his eldest daughter, Catsouras told his three other
girls that they couldn’t look at the Internet. “But, other than that,
people told me there was nothing I could do,” he recalled. “They said,
‘Don’t worry. It’ll blow over.’ ” Nevertheless, Catsouras embarked on a
modern legal quest: to remove information from the Internet. In
recent years, many people have made the same kind of effort, from
actors who don’t want their private photographs in broad circulation
to ex-convicts who don’t want their long-ago legal troubles to prevent
them from finding jobs. Despite the varied circumstances, all these
people want something that does not exist in the United States: the
right to be forgotten.
The situation is different in Europe, thanks to a court case that was
decided earlier this year. In 1998, a Spanish newspaper called La
Vanguardia published two small notices stating that certain property
owned by a lawyer named Mario Costeja González was going to be
auctioned to pay off his debts. Costeja cleared up the financial
difficulties, but the newspaper records continued to surface whenever
anyone Googled his name. In 2010, Costeja went to Spanish
authorities to demand that the newspaper remove the items from its
Web site and that Google remove the links from searches for his
name. The Spanish Data Protection Agency, which is the local
representative of a Continent-wide network of computer-privacy
regulators, denied the claim against La Vanguardia but granted the
claim against Google. This spring, the European Court of Justice,
which operates.
THIS PRESENTATION IS ALL ABOUT GOOGLE. THIS PRESENTATION GIVES YOU THE GLIMPSE OF GOOGLE FROM IT'S PAST TO PRESENT .
___________________________________________________
follow me for more awesome presentation on interesting topics
@Bhavesh Singh
5 7As globalization continues to transform the world o.docxtarifarmarie
5 7
As globalization continues to transform the world
of business, companies that decide to expand into other
countries are faced with many challenges. The markets in
developing nations hold great promise; however, any com-
pany that wishes to operate in them must often overcome
both relatively minor problems, such as dealing with cul-
tural differences, as well as larger problems, such as serious
human rights abuses. Google, the world’s largest internet
company, has to contend with both cultural differences
and human rights abuses while operating in China. An
analysis of Google’s actions in China shows how creative
solutions can be found to complex ethical problems.
The challenges Google has faced in China primarily
stem from the Chinese government’s controversial policy
of censoring the internet. Censorship is currently enacted
through what is officially known as the Golden Shield
Project; however, in the West it is more often referred to
by its unofficial nickname, the Great Firewall of China.
This policy was enacted in 1998 and has drawn much
criticism from Western governments and human rights
organizations like Amnesty International and Reporters
Without Borders (Clinton 2010; Amnesty International
2006; Reporters Without Borders 2009). Despite inter-
national pressure, the Chinese government adamantly
supports the censorship, and in early 2010 it released a
white paper addressing internet freedoms in China. In
the white paper, the government spelled out its official
policy, which is to block:
[Anything] against the cardinal principles set
forth in the Constitution; endangering state secu-
rity, divulging state secrets, subverting state power
and jeopardizing national unification; damaging
state honor and interests; instigating ethnic hatred
or discrimination and jeopardizing ethnic unity;
jeopardizing state religious policy, propagating
heretical or superstitious ideas; spreading rumors,
disrupting social order and stability; disseminat-
ing obscenity, pornography, gambling, violence,
brutality and terror or abetting crime; humiliat-
ing or slandering others, trespassing on the lawful
rights and interests of others; and other contents
forbidden by laws and administrative regulations.
(Information Office of the State Council 2010)
This policy is clearly broad enough that it gives China’s
Ministry of Public Security the power to block anything
it wants.
The Chinese government often uses this power to
quench criticism and suppress information about human
rights abuses (Amnesty International 2006). In order to
enforce the policy, China employs tens of thousands of
people to monitor forums, chat rooms, and bulletin boards.
It also filters all internet traffic coming into China from
other countries and requires all internet companies in
China to self-censor their content (Elgin and Einhorn
2006). Despite all of this, the Chinese government insists
that “Chinese citizens fully enjoy freedom .
The internet is reshaping its form for privacy as the 350 billion dollar digi...aditi agarwal
As Apple and Google enact privateness modifications, businesses are grappling with the fallout, Madison Avenue is preventing returned and Facebook has cried foul
Social Media Strategy 12 Month Sample PlanRajendra Singh
Social Media SWOT Analysis
Strengths
• New cutting edge Technology
• Quality and huge spectrum
• Availability of cash, strong balance sheet
• Superior execution skills
• Whole country license
• Respectable brand
Weaknesses
• New Team
• Complex Launch
• New Process
• Dependence on Infrastructure partners
• New untested 4G handsets
• Churn of Customers
• Customer Power
• Under developed eco-system
Opportunities
• Big Market (1300 million population)
• Low Internet penetration (11%)
• Low broad band penetration (4%)
• Higher % population below 25 years of age (55%)
• Low social media penetration (6%)
• Higher download speed
• Low legacy effect
• Lifestyle trends
• New business applications
Threats
• Uncertain Foreign Direct Investment
• Introduction of new/better technology
• Retaliation from existing players
• Government sanctions against social media
• Negative environment factors
• Unstable Government
• Vertical Integration
Integrated & Dynamically Consistent Strategy
Business Strategy
• To be number 1, market leader with 30% plus market share, 4G company in next 5 years
Digital Marketing Strategy
• To contribute 50% of company’s overall marketing contribution in the next 5 years (progressively from 20% in the 1st year)
• To have positive ROI on Digital Marketing Expenditure
Social Media Strategy
• To be an innovative Social Media integrated marketing team enabling Company’s overall business plan, business strategy and digital marketing strategy.
• To collaborate with all teams , functions and departments of the company
• To be the dominant and market leader with more than 30% share in 4G Social Media Marketing.
• To assist in all the phases of business and sales funnel towards conversion.
Business planning should start with defining clear goals, and social media is no exception. Without a clear idea of what you want to accomplish with social media, you are unlikely to achieve anything at all because your efforts will be scattered or aimless. In addition, different social media goals require different sets of action. For example, if your goal is to gain consumer credibility, that looks very different than if your goal is to convert 30 percent of prospects to sales.
Start by writing down at least three social media goals for your business. Make sure each goal is specific, realistic and measurable. It is vital to make your goals measurable so that you can track your business’ progress towards each goal. It’s also important that your goals for social media relate to your overall goals for your business.
My Business Social Media Goals Are:
1. ___________________________________________________
2. ___________________________________________________
3. ___________________________________________________
Social Media Strategy University of California Irvine 2014 weekwise objective...Rajendra Singh
Social Media Strategy University of California Irvine 2014 week wise objectives and assignments Description and details of all 7 weeks of the course. http://unex.uci.edu/ http://unex.uci.edu/areas/business_mgmt/social_media/
Massive and rapid business growth engine 11 nuggetsRajendra Singh
Nuggets to scale and grow business to/at massive level rapidly. Write your inputs and ideas for improvement of the slide. More details will follow regarding each of the nuggets.
This 7-second Brain Wave Ritual Attracts Money To You.!nirahealhty
Discover the power of a simple 7-second brain wave ritual that can attract wealth and abundance into your life. By tapping into specific brain frequencies, this technique helps you manifest financial success effortlessly. Ready to transform your financial future? Try this powerful ritual and start attracting money today!
Bridging the Digital Gap Brad Spiegel Macon, GA Initiative.pptxBrad Spiegel Macon GA
Brad Spiegel Macon GA’s journey exemplifies the profound impact that one individual can have on their community. Through his unwavering dedication to digital inclusion, he’s not only bridging the gap in Macon but also setting an example for others to follow.
# Internet Security: Safeguarding Your Digital World
In the contemporary digital age, the internet is a cornerstone of our daily lives. It connects us to vast amounts of information, provides platforms for communication, enables commerce, and offers endless entertainment. However, with these conveniences come significant security challenges. Internet security is essential to protect our digital identities, sensitive data, and overall online experience. This comprehensive guide explores the multifaceted world of internet security, providing insights into its importance, common threats, and effective strategies to safeguard your digital world.
## Understanding Internet Security
Internet security encompasses the measures and protocols used to protect information, devices, and networks from unauthorized access, attacks, and damage. It involves a wide range of practices designed to safeguard data confidentiality, integrity, and availability. Effective internet security is crucial for individuals, businesses, and governments alike, as cyber threats continue to evolve in complexity and scale.
### Key Components of Internet Security
1. **Confidentiality**: Ensuring that information is accessible only to those authorized to access it.
2. **Integrity**: Protecting information from being altered or tampered with by unauthorized parties.
3. **Availability**: Ensuring that authorized users have reliable access to information and resources when needed.
## Common Internet Security Threats
Cyber threats are numerous and constantly evolving. Understanding these threats is the first step in protecting against them. Some of the most common internet security threats include:
### Malware
Malware, or malicious software, is designed to harm, exploit, or otherwise compromise a device, network, or service. Common types of malware include:
- **Viruses**: Programs that attach themselves to legitimate software and replicate, spreading to other programs and files.
- **Worms**: Standalone malware that replicates itself to spread to other computers.
- **Trojan Horses**: Malicious software disguised as legitimate software.
- **Ransomware**: Malware that encrypts a user's files and demands a ransom for the decryption key.
- **Spyware**: Software that secretly monitors and collects user information.
### Phishing
Phishing is a social engineering attack that aims to steal sensitive information such as usernames, passwords, and credit card details. Attackers often masquerade as trusted entities in email or other communication channels, tricking victims into providing their information.
### Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) Attacks
MitM attacks occur when an attacker intercepts and potentially alters communication between two parties without their knowledge. This can lead to the unauthorized acquisition of sensitive information.
### Denial-of-Service (DoS) and Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Attacks
APNIC Foundation, presented by Ellisha Heppner at the PNG DNS Forum 2024APNIC
Ellisha Heppner, Grant Management Lead, presented an update on APNIC Foundation to the PNG DNS Forum held from 6 to 10 May, 2024 in Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea.
1.Wireless Communication System_Wireless communication is a broad term that i...JeyaPerumal1
Wireless communication involves the transmission of information over a distance without the help of wires, cables or any other forms of electrical conductors.
Wireless communication is a broad term that incorporates all procedures and forms of connecting and communicating between two or more devices using a wireless signal through wireless communication technologies and devices.
Features of Wireless Communication
The evolution of wireless technology has brought many advancements with its effective features.
The transmitted distance can be anywhere between a few meters (for example, a television's remote control) and thousands of kilometers (for example, radio communication).
Wireless communication can be used for cellular telephony, wireless access to the internet, wireless home networking, and so on.
Multi-cluster Kubernetes Networking- Patterns, Projects and GuidelinesSanjeev Rampal
Talk presented at Kubernetes Community Day, New York, May 2024.
Technical summary of Multi-Cluster Kubernetes Networking architectures with focus on 4 key topics.
1) Key patterns for Multi-cluster architectures
2) Architectural comparison of several OSS/ CNCF projects to address these patterns
3) Evolution trends for the APIs of these projects
4) Some design recommendations & guidelines for adopting/ deploying these solutions.
Google launches 'right to be forgotten' request form 30th may 2014
1. Google Launches 'Right To Be Forgotten' Request Form
BY STEPHANIE MLOT
MAY 30, 2014 09:45AM EST
The application requests a home country, name, email,
and list of URLs to be removed, as well as valid photo
ID.
2. You may not be able to hide from your past, but now
you can delete it from the Internet - in the EU, at least.
A recent ruling from the Court of Justice of the
European Union called on Google to provide a way for
people to request that their information be removed
from the search engine. As a result, Google this week
published a search removal request form.
3. The online application allows residents of the EU's 28
member states to petition for certain links to be
removed from the search engine's results.
The case dates back to 1998, when a large Spanish
daily newspaper published an article about Mario
Costeja Gonzalez's social security debts. When the
paper's archives were later published online, the man
discovered that a search for his name produced the
article.
4. Despite his attempts, both the newspaper publisher
and Google refused to remove the story or the direct
link, so he filed a complaint with the Spanish data
protection authorities, which led to a 2010 order for
Google to remove mention of his name from search
results.
The Web giant appealed, and in June 2013 won a case
in the EU's Central Court of Justice, which found that
search engines were not required to remove such
links, provided that publication of the data is legal.
5. That decision was overturned, however, earlier this
month, in what Google called "a disappointing ruling for
search engines and online publishers in general."
Still an "initial effort," the online application requires
details including your home country, full name, email
address, and list of URLs to be removed. Users will
also need a valid form of photo ID, in an effort for
Google to crack down on fraudulent removal requests.
6. "We will assess each individual request and attempt to
balance the privacy rights of the individual with the
public's right to know and distribute information,"
Google explained.
Don't expect your petition to automatically result in a
clean Web slate. Information about financial scams,
professional malpractice, criminal convictions, or public
conduct of government officials, for example, may not
make the cut.
7. Gonzalez, meanwhile, might be pleased with the
outcome, but Google executive chairman Eric Schmii
not; he said recently that the European court made a
mistake.