The document discusses how many people enjoy bikes but not necessarily cycles that promote mindlessness through oppression, dependence, and blindness. It suggests that now may be a time when there is a means to break away from such cycles, especially given the intelligence of individuals within large institutions is limited by hierarchy. It proposes experimenting with measuring community well-being, considering humanity as a shared nationality, and jump starting revival through betting on synchronicity between people, spaces, and technology.

2. many love bikes.

3. many love bikes. not so many love cycles.

4. many love bikes. not so many love cycles.
at least not the ones that perpetuate mindlessness via
oppression/compulsion/dependence/blindness.

5. many love bikes. not so many love cycles.
at least not the ones that perpetuate mindlessness via
oppression/compulsion/dependence/blindness.
and especially not when there is a means to breaka w a y .

6. many love bikes. not so many love cycles.
at least not the ones that perpetuate mindlessness via
oppression/compulsion/dependence/blindness.
and especially not when there is a means to breaka w a y .
perhaps now… is one of those times.

7. many love bikes. not so many love cycles.
at least not the ones that perpetuate mindlessness via
oppression/compulsion/dependence/blindness.
and especially not when there is a means to breaka w a y .
perhaps now… is one of those times.

8. many love bikes. not so many love cycles.
at least not the ones that perpetuate mindlessness via
oppression/compulsion/dependence/blindness.
and especially not when there is a means to breaka w a y .
perhaps now… is one of those times.
maybe we say...

9. many love bikes. not so many love cycles.
at least not the ones that perpetuate mindlessness via
oppression/compulsion/dependence/blindness.
and especially not when there is a means to breaka w a y .
perhaps now… is one of those times.
maybe we say...

10. @stigmergy

14. @grab your x-d glasses

16. … no matter how intelligent the people staffing a large institution are as
individuals, hierarchy makes their intelligence unusable.
… a corporate hierarchy interferes with the judgment of what Friedrich
Hayek called “people-on-the-spot,” ..
from Kevin Carson’s The Desktop Regulatory State

17. everything is experiment

18. the premise:
Different measure – how are the people around you doing.
Community as credential/curriculum/ecosystem.
Soul/world peace. Nationality: human.
Jump start a revival with an initial bet on synchronicity.
[sync: enough people, spaces/resources, and tech]
Emerge/model ongoing reallocation/upcycling of resources.
Based on grit (passion + persistence) as sustainability.
Stemming from 2 conversations to help people see better.
In-the-cityas-the-day as mental/physical spaces of permission.
@ibp