Why should it be hard to share geospatial native title information? The focus of this presentation will be to highlight geospatial information sharing initiatives which been flourished in the native title landscape and the reasons for their success
CNIC Information System with Pakdata Cf In Pakistan
Geospatial Native Title Information: Reality, not a Dream
1. Geospatial native title information:
Reality, not a dream
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Spatial Information (ATSISI) Workshop
Adelaide 27 November 2008
1. Where opinions are expressed in this presentation they are those of the presenter and not necessarily those of the National Native Title Tribunal
Steven James1
Spatial Architect, Geospatial Services
2. provocative question
is access to geospatial native title
information a reality ?
… from the perspective of
an ordinary user?
3. presentation objective
‘Discover’ the
availability
accessibility
user friendliness, of
geospatial native title information
based on criteria, and
access methods
4. what criteria?
2006 e-Government Strategy
“govt. information services will be easy
to understand and locate”
vision for 2010
Meeting users’ needs
Connected service delivery
Value for money
Public sector capability
1. 2006 e-Government Strategy, Responsive Government: A New Service Agenda
1
5. criterion 1 – meeting users’ needs
information services easy to locate
interaction is quick
easy to pinpoint information
range of delivery modes
native title
6. criterion 2 – connected service delivery
consistent and unified
PUBLIC
SECTOR
CONNECTED
SERVICE
DELIVERY
MULTIPLE
CHANNELS
source: 2006 e-Government Strategy, Responsive Government - A New Service Agenda
7. criterion 3 – value for money
less double handling
more informed users
common standards
information sharing
8. criterion 4 – public sector capability
enhanced capability
enhanced skills
public sector capability
source: Shared Land Implementation Platform Final Implementation Plan, October 2004
9. methods of access
3 types of access methods
desktop
datasets
browser
number of users
‘personal’ datasets e.g. ESRI, Mapinfo
intranet, extranet, internet
web maps
accessmethod
linked
services
OGC services e.g. WMS, WFS
10. the challenge
using only datasets and tools available
on the internet, build a visual picture
of native title over the recent Witjara
National Park determination area
15. Native TitleVision – check it out
accessed via the web
URL http://www.ntv.nntt.gov.au
user name & password: nntt_guest
Australia wide coverage
easy to use !
16. at a glance
browser
advantages
simple to use
only a browser is
needed
available for
Windows, Apple and
Linux computers
17. at a glance
browser
disadvantages
internet access
required
currency may be a
issues with non-
custodial datasets
may need to visit
many websites
inconsistent
functions
18. scorecard
browsers
meeting users’ needs
connected service delivery
value for money
public sector capability
verdict : Reality
2
1.5
2
1.5
7 out of 10total
20. sources of desktop datasets
native title
NNTT – ESRI, Mapinfo, KML formats
topography
Geoscience Australia – above + GeoPDF
land administration & use
SA Dept for Environment & Heritage
SA Dept of Planning & Local Govt.
resource development
Primary Industries & Resources SA
imagery
Dept of Climate Change
refer to Appendix A of this presentation for website addresses for the above themes
21. Open Source desktop GIS
Quantum GIS (QGIS)
Linux, Mac and Windows platforms
vector, raster and database formats
wide range of formats
user friendly
free
refer to Appendix B of this presentation for website address for the above Open Source application
22. Open Source desktop GIS
Portable GIS by Archaegeek
GIS on a USB stick
Desktop GIS
Webserver
Database server
WMS/WFS servers
free
refer to Appendix B of this presentation for website address for the above Open Source applications
24. at a glance
desktop data
advantages
assign symbology
select layers
portability
collect new data
integrate imagery
ad hoc queries
combine formats
better labelling
quality output
25. at a glance
desktop data
disadvantages
skilled users
manage datasets
maintain currency
manage datums
initial setup
26. scorecard
desktop data
meeting users’ needs
connected service delivery
value for money
public sector capability
verdict : Reality
1.5
1.5
2
1.5
6.5 out of 10total
31. at a glance
services
advantages
integration
automation
up-to-date
convenient
multi-platform
32. at a glance
services
disadvantages
high skill level
tailoring required
dependency on
service providers
33. scorecard
desktop data
meeting users’ needs
connected service delivery
value for money
public sector capability
verdict : Reality
2
2
2
1
7 out of 10total
34. conclusions
browser ideal for infrequent users
Open Source desktop GIS is mature,
flexible and cost effective
online availability of native title is a
reality
further work needed to get more
datasets online