From Binary Trees to AVL Trees
Understanding the Need for Self-
Balancing Trees
Presented by: [Your Name]
Institution: [Your Institution]
Introduction to Trees
• A tree is a non-linear hierarchical data
structure.
• A binary tree has at most two children per
node.
• Terminology: root, node, edge, leaf, depth,
height.
Binary Tree – Structure & Types
• Full Binary Tree: Every node has 0 or 2
children.
• Complete Binary Tree: All levels filled except
possibly the last.
• Perfect Binary Tree: All internal nodes have 2
children & all leaves at same level.
Binary Search Tree (BST)
• Each node’s left child is smaller, right child is
larger.
• Example: Insert 10, 5, 15, 3, 7, 12, 18.
• Diagram: BST representation (to be drawn
manually).
Problem in BST – Skewed Trees
• Worst-case: BST becomes left- or right-
skewed.
• Caused by sorted data input.
• Results in degraded performance: O(n) time
complexity.
• Diagram: Skewed BST [10, 20, 30, 40, 50].
Need for Balanced Trees
• Goal: Maintain height ~ log(n).
• Balanced trees ensure O(log n) time
complexity.
• Solution: Self-balancing BSTs like AVL, Red-
Black, B-Trees.
Introduction to AVL Trees
• Named after Adelson-Velsky and Landis
(1962).
• Self-balancing BST: Balance factor -1, 0, or +1.
• BF = Height(left subtree) - Height(right
subtree).
AVL Tree – Rotations
• Used to restore balance after
insertion/deletion.
• Types of rotations:
• Left Rotation (LL), Right Rotation (RR),
• Left-Right (LR), Right-Left (RL).
• Include diagrams for each.
AVL Tree Example
• Insert values: 30, 20, 10.
• RR Rotation applied to restore balance.
• Step-by-step diagram (to be added manually).
Comparison: BST vs. AVL Tree
• BST: Not guaranteed to be balanced.
• AVL: Always balanced (BF = -1, 0, +1).
• BST Worst-case height: O(n), AVL: O(log n).
• AVL requires rotations on insert/delete.
Why AVL Trees Are Best
• AVL Trees maintain strict balance (BF = -1, 0,
+1):
• → Lower tree height.
• → Faster search time (O(log n)).
• Compared to:
• Red-Black Trees: Loosely balanced, slightly
taller.
• B-Trees: Optimized for disk; height for block-
wise, not RAM.
Applications of AVL Trees
• Used in database indexing.
• Memory management.
• Real-time systems.
• Scenarios with frequent insertions/deletions +
fast lookup.
Conclusion
• Binary Trees are foundational structures.
• BSTs suffer in performance if unbalanced.
• AVL Trees solve this via self-balancing.
• Ensures optimal O(log n) for
search/insert/delete.
Q&A
• Thank you!
• Questions are welcome.

From_Binary_Trees_to_AVL_Trees_Presentation.pptx

  • 1.
    From Binary Treesto AVL Trees Understanding the Need for Self- Balancing Trees Presented by: [Your Name] Institution: [Your Institution]
  • 2.
    Introduction to Trees •A tree is a non-linear hierarchical data structure. • A binary tree has at most two children per node. • Terminology: root, node, edge, leaf, depth, height.
  • 3.
    Binary Tree –Structure & Types • Full Binary Tree: Every node has 0 or 2 children. • Complete Binary Tree: All levels filled except possibly the last. • Perfect Binary Tree: All internal nodes have 2 children & all leaves at same level.
  • 4.
    Binary Search Tree(BST) • Each node’s left child is smaller, right child is larger. • Example: Insert 10, 5, 15, 3, 7, 12, 18. • Diagram: BST representation (to be drawn manually).
  • 5.
    Problem in BST– Skewed Trees • Worst-case: BST becomes left- or right- skewed. • Caused by sorted data input. • Results in degraded performance: O(n) time complexity. • Diagram: Skewed BST [10, 20, 30, 40, 50].
  • 6.
    Need for BalancedTrees • Goal: Maintain height ~ log(n). • Balanced trees ensure O(log n) time complexity. • Solution: Self-balancing BSTs like AVL, Red- Black, B-Trees.
  • 7.
    Introduction to AVLTrees • Named after Adelson-Velsky and Landis (1962). • Self-balancing BST: Balance factor -1, 0, or +1. • BF = Height(left subtree) - Height(right subtree).
  • 8.
    AVL Tree –Rotations • Used to restore balance after insertion/deletion. • Types of rotations: • Left Rotation (LL), Right Rotation (RR), • Left-Right (LR), Right-Left (RL). • Include diagrams for each.
  • 9.
    AVL Tree Example •Insert values: 30, 20, 10. • RR Rotation applied to restore balance. • Step-by-step diagram (to be added manually).
  • 10.
    Comparison: BST vs.AVL Tree • BST: Not guaranteed to be balanced. • AVL: Always balanced (BF = -1, 0, +1). • BST Worst-case height: O(n), AVL: O(log n). • AVL requires rotations on insert/delete.
  • 11.
    Why AVL TreesAre Best • AVL Trees maintain strict balance (BF = -1, 0, +1): • → Lower tree height. • → Faster search time (O(log n)). • Compared to: • Red-Black Trees: Loosely balanced, slightly taller. • B-Trees: Optimized for disk; height for block- wise, not RAM.
  • 12.
    Applications of AVLTrees • Used in database indexing. • Memory management. • Real-time systems. • Scenarios with frequent insertions/deletions + fast lookup.
  • 13.
    Conclusion • Binary Treesare foundational structures. • BSTs suffer in performance if unbalanced. • AVL Trees solve this via self-balancing. • Ensures optimal O(log n) for search/insert/delete.
  • 14.
    Q&A • Thank you! •Questions are welcome.