This document outlines a pre-application protocol for mediation information and assessment in family court proceedings in England and Wales. It aims to encourage parties to explore mediation and alternative dispute resolution before bringing a court application. The protocol requires applicants, before applying to court, to attend a mediation information meeting except in certain circumstances. It is intended to help resolve family disputes when possible without costly court proceedings.
Discovery Practice (Series: Newbie Litigator School - Fall Edition)Financial Poise
If you say the word “discovery” to a litigator, the reaction may not be kind. Discovery-the exchange of relevant information- usually in the form of documents or oral depositions, takes up the majority of a litigator’s time and costs clients the most money.
To view the accompanying webinar, go to: https://www.financialpoise.com/financial-poise-webinars/discovery-practice-2020/
This is a detailed overview of the enforcement of foreign arbitral awards: New York Convention 1958, with a special reference to the section on foreign arbitral awards in Nepalese Arbitration act 2055.
International Criminal Court - ICC 2018 the Prosecutor opened three new preli...MYO AUNG Myanmar
Myanmar Aung
39 mins ·
https://www.icc-cpi.int/itemsDocu…/181205-rep-otp-PE-ENG.pdf
https://www.facebook.com/InternationalCriminalCourt/posts/984651011730610
International Criminal Court - ICC
2018
This year, the ICC Office of the Prosecutor opened three new preliminary examinations relating to the situation in the Philippines, the situation in Venezuela, and the alleged deportation of the Rohingya people from Myanmar to Bangladesh.
Additionally, following a thorough preliminary examination, the Prosecutor concluded that there was no reasonable basis to proceed with an investigation into the situation in Gabon, and closed this preliminary examination.
The Office further continued its preliminary examinations of the situations in Colombia, Guinea, Iraq/United Kingdom, Nigeria, Palestine, and Ukraine. This process aims to determine whether a situation meets the legal criteria established by the Rome Statute to warrant investigation by the Office.
Read this year’s report of the ICC Prosecutor on Preliminary Examination Activities: https://www.icc-cpi.int/Pages/item.aspx…
https://www.icc-cpi.int/Pages/item.aspx…
Report on Preliminary Examination Activities (2018)
Report : 5 December 2018
Report on Preliminary Examination Activities (2018)
English, Français
Source : Office of the Prosecutor
SITUATIONS UNDER PHASE 2 (SUBJECT-MATTER JURISDICTION)
BANGLADESH/MYANMAR
Procedural History
Discovery Practice (Series: Newbie Litigator School - Fall Edition)Financial Poise
If you say the word “discovery” to a litigator, the reaction may not be kind. Discovery-the exchange of relevant information- usually in the form of documents or oral depositions, takes up the majority of a litigator’s time and costs clients the most money.
To view the accompanying webinar, go to: https://www.financialpoise.com/financial-poise-webinars/discovery-practice-2020/
This is a detailed overview of the enforcement of foreign arbitral awards: New York Convention 1958, with a special reference to the section on foreign arbitral awards in Nepalese Arbitration act 2055.
International Criminal Court - ICC 2018 the Prosecutor opened three new preli...MYO AUNG Myanmar
Myanmar Aung
39 mins ·
https://www.icc-cpi.int/itemsDocu…/181205-rep-otp-PE-ENG.pdf
https://www.facebook.com/InternationalCriminalCourt/posts/984651011730610
International Criminal Court - ICC
2018
This year, the ICC Office of the Prosecutor opened three new preliminary examinations relating to the situation in the Philippines, the situation in Venezuela, and the alleged deportation of the Rohingya people from Myanmar to Bangladesh.
Additionally, following a thorough preliminary examination, the Prosecutor concluded that there was no reasonable basis to proceed with an investigation into the situation in Gabon, and closed this preliminary examination.
The Office further continued its preliminary examinations of the situations in Colombia, Guinea, Iraq/United Kingdom, Nigeria, Palestine, and Ukraine. This process aims to determine whether a situation meets the legal criteria established by the Rome Statute to warrant investigation by the Office.
Read this year’s report of the ICC Prosecutor on Preliminary Examination Activities: https://www.icc-cpi.int/Pages/item.aspx…
https://www.icc-cpi.int/Pages/item.aspx…
Report on Preliminary Examination Activities (2018)
Report : 5 December 2018
Report on Preliminary Examination Activities (2018)
English, Français
Source : Office of the Prosecutor
SITUATIONS UNDER PHASE 2 (SUBJECT-MATTER JURISDICTION)
BANGLADESH/MYANMAR
Procedural History
This presentation by Beryl A. Howell Bio, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Columbia, was made during the discussion Access to the case file and protection of confidential information” held at the 130th meeting of the OECD Working Party No. 3 on Co-operation and Enforcement on 3 December 2019. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found at oe.cd/acfci.
If you say the word “discovery” to a litigator, the reaction may not be kind. Discovery—the exchange of relevant information, usually in the form of documents or oral depositions, takes up the majority of a litigator’s time and costs clients the most money. This episode begins with a summary of the rules governing discovery. In particular, we discuss the new federal rules governing the preservation and discovery of electronic data and information, and the new concept of “proportionality” in discovery. We also discuss the practicalities of discovery: budgeting, tactics, and common opportunities and pitfalls. This hour demystifies a mystifying process, and to provide listeners with what they need to know to not get tripped up in litigation. At the very least, you will understand why the acronym “ESI” causes our panel to wince.
Part of the webinar series: NEWBIE LITIGATOR SCHOOL- 101 PART I 2022
See more at https://www.financialpoise.com/webinars/
Conduct of arbitral proceeding part 2 vaibhav goyalVaibhav Goyal
Within the period of time agreed upon by the parties or determined by the arbitral tribunal, the claimant shall state the facts supporting his claim, the points at issue and the relief or remedy sought, and the respondent shall state his defence in respect of these particulars, unless the parties have otherwise agreed as to the required elements of those statements.
MUTUAL CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT FORMAT
FREE LEGAL AND ACCOUNTANT FORMATS
KANOON KE RAKHWALE INDIA
HIRE LAWYER ONLINE
LAW FIRMS IN DELHI
CA FIRM DELHI
VISIT : https://www.kanoonkerakhwale.com/
VISIT : https://hirelawyeronline.com/
1. Practice Direction 3A –
Pre-Application Protocol for Mediation Information
and Assessment
This Practice Direction supplements FPR Part 3 (Pre-Application Protocol for Mediation
Information and Assessment)
Introduction
1.1 This Practice Direction applies where a person is considering applying for an order in family
proceedings of a type specified in Annex B (referred to in this Direction as “relevant family
proceedings”).
1.2 Terms used in this Practice Direction and the accompanying Pre-action Protocol have the
same meaning as in the FPR.
1.3 This Practice Direction is supplemented by the following Annexes:
(i) Annex A: The Pre-application Protocol (“the Protocol”), which sets out steps which
the court will normally expect an applicant to follow before an application is made to
the court in relevant family proceedings;
(ii) Annex B: Proceedings which are “relevant family proceedings” for the purposes of
this Practice Direction; and
(iii) Annex C: Circumstances in which attendance at a Mediation Information and
Assessment Meeting is not expected.
Aims
2.1 The purpose of this Practice Direction and the accompanying Protocol is to:
(a) supplement the court’s powers in Part 3 of the FPR to encourage and facilitate the
use of alternative dispute resolution;
(b) set out good practice to be followed by any person who is considering making an
application to court for an order in relevant family proceedings; and
(c) ensure, as far as possible, that all parties have considered mediation as an alternative
means of resolving their disputes.
Rationale
3.1 There is a general acknowledgement that an adversarial court process is not always best
suited to the resolution of family disputes, particularly private law disputes between parents
relating to children, with such disputes often best resolved through discussion and agreement,
where that can be managed safely and appropriately.
3.2 Litigants who seek public funding for certain types of family proceedings are (subject to
some exceptions) already required to attend a meeting with a mediator as a pre-condition of
receiving public funding.
3.3 There is growing recognition of the benefits of early information and advice about mediation
and of the need for those wishing to make an application to court, whether publicly funded or
otherwise, to consider alternative means of resolving their disputes, as appropriate.
Jordan Publishing
www.familylaw.co.uk
2. 3.4 In private law proceedings relating to children, the court is actively involved in helping
parties to explore ways of resolving their dispute. The Private Law Programme, set out in Practice
Direction 12B, provides for a first hearing dispute resolution appointment (‘FHDRA’), at which
the judge, legal advisor or magistrates, accompanied by an officer from Cafcass (the Children and
Family Court Advisory and Support Service), will discuss with parties both the nature of their
dispute and whether it could be resolved by mediation or other alternative means and can give the
parties information about services which may be available to assist them. The court should also
have information obtained through safeguarding checks carried out by Cafcass, to ensure that any
agreement between the parties, or any dispute resolution process selected, is in the interests of the
child and safe for all concerned.
3.5 Against that background, it is likely to save court time and expense if the parties take steps to
resolve their dispute without pursuing court proceedings. Parties will therefore be expected to
explore the scope for resolving their dispute through mediation before embarking on the court
process.
The Pre-application Protocol
4.1 To encourage this approach, all potential applicants for a court order in relevant family
proceedings will be expected, before making their application, to have followed the steps set out
in the Protocol. This requires a potential applicant except in certain specified circumstances, to
consider with a mediator whether the dispute may be capable of being resolved through
mediation. The court will expect all applicants to have compiled with the Protocol before
commencing proceedings and (except where any of the circumstances In Annex C applies) will
expect any respondent to have attended a Mediation Information and Assessment Meeting, if
invited to do so. If court proceedings are taken, the court will wish to know at the first hearing
whether mediation has been considered by the parties. In considering the conduct of any relevant
family proceedings, the court will take into account any failure to comply with the Protocol and
may refer the parties to a meeting with a mediator before the proceedings continue further.
4.2 Nothing in the Protocol is to be read as affecting the operation of the Private Law
Programme, set out in Practice Direction 12B, or the role of the court at the first hearing in any
relevant family proceedings.
Annex A – The Pre-application Protocol
1 This Protocol applies where a person (“the applicant”) is considering making an application to
the court for an order in relevant family proceedings.
2 Before an applicant makes an application to the court for an order in relevant family
proceedings, the applicant (or the applicant’s legal representative) should contact a family
mediator to arrange for the applicant to attend an information meeting about family mediation and
other forms of alternative dispute resolution (referred to in this Protocol as “a Mediation
Information and Assessment Meeting”).
3 An applicant is not expected to attend a Mediation Information and Assessment Meeting where
any of the circumstances set out in Annex C applies.
4 Information on how to find a family mediator may be obtained from local family courts, from
the Community Legal Advice Helpline – CLA Direct (0845 345 4345) or at www.direct.gov.uk.
5 The applicant (or the applicant’s legal representative) should provide the mediator with contact
details for the other party or parties to the dispute (“the respondent(s)”), so that the mediator can
contact the respondent(s) to discuss that party’s willingness and availability to attend a Mediation
Information and Assessment Meeting.
Jordan Publishing
www.familylaw.co.uk
3. 6 The applicant should then attend a Mediation Information and Assessment Meeting arranged
by the mediator. If the parties are willing to attend together, the meeting may be conducted
jointly, but where necessary separate meetings may be held. If the applicant and respondent(s) do
not attend a joint meeting, the mediator will invite the respondent(s) to a separate meeting unless
any of the circumstances set out in Annex C applies.
7 A mediator who arranges a Mediation Information and Assessment Meeting with one or more
parties to a dispute should consider with the party or parties concerned whether public funding
may be available to meet the cost of the meeting and any subsequent mediation. Where none of
the parties is eligible for, or wishes to seek, public funding, any charge made by the mediator for
the Mediation Information and Assessment Meeting will be the responsibility of the party or
parties attending, in accordance with any agreement made with the mediator.
8 If the applicant then makes an application to the court in respect of the dispute, the applicant
should at the same time file a completed Family Mediation Information and Assessment Form
(Form FM1) confirming attendance at a Mediation Information and Assessment Meeting or
giving the reasons for not attending.
9 The Form FM1, must be completed and signed by the mediator, and countersigned by the
applicant or the applicant’s legal representative, where either:
(a) the applicant has attended a Mediation Information and Assessment Meeting; or
(b) the applicant has not attended a Mediation Information and Assessment Meeting and
(i) the mediator is satisfied that mediation is not suitable because another party to
the dispute is unwilling to attend a Mediation Information and Assessment
Meeting and consider mediation;
(ii) the mediator determines that the case is not suitable for a Mediation
Information and Assessment Meeting; or
(iii) a mediator has made a determination within the previous four months that the
case is not suitable for a Mediation Information and Assessment Meeting or
for mediation.
10 In all other circumstances, the Form FM1 must be completed and signed by the applicant or
the applicant’s legal representative.
11 The form may be obtained from magistrates’ courts, county courts or the High Court or from
www.direct.gov.uk.
Annex B – Proceedings which are “relevant family proceedings” for
the purposes of this Practice Direction
1 Private law proceedings relating to children, except:
• proceedings for an enforcement order, a financial compensation order or an order
under paragraph 9 or Part 2 of Schedule Al to the Children Act 1989;
• any other proceedings for enforcement of an order made in private law proceedings;
or
• where emergency proceedings have been brought in respect of the same child(ren)
and have not been determined.
(“Private law proceedings” and “emergency proceedings” are defined in Rule 12.2)
2 Proceedings for a financial remedy, except:
• Proceedings for an avoidance of disposition order or an order preventing a
Jordan Publishing
www.familylaw.co.uk
4. disposition;
• Proceedings for enforcement of any order made in financial remedy proceedings.
(“Financial remedy” is defined in Rule 2.3(1) and “avoidance of disposition order”
and “order preventing a disposition” are defined in Rule 9.3(1))
Annex C – A person considering making an application to the court
in relevant family proceedings is not expected to attend a
Mediation Information and Assessment Meeting before doing so if
any of the following circumstances applies:
1 The mediator is satisfied that mediation is not suitable because another party to the dispute is
unwilling to attend a Mediation Information and Assessment Meeting and consider mediation.
2 The mediator determines that the case is not suitable for a Mediation Information and
Assessment Meeting.
3 A mediator has made a determination within the previous four months that the case is not
suitable for a Mediation Information and Assessment Meeting or for mediation.
4 Domestic abuse
Any party has, to the applicant’s knowledge, made an allegation of domestic violence against
another party and this has resulted in a police investigation or the issuing of civil proceedings for
the protection of any party within the last 12 months.
5 Bankruptcy
The dispute concerns financial issues and the applicant or another party is bankrupt.
6 The parties are in agreement and there is no dispute to mediate.
7 The whereabouts of the other party are unknown to the applicant.
8 The prospective application is for an order in relevant family proceedings which are already in
existence and are continuing.
9 The prospective application is to be made without notice to the other party.
10 Urgency
The prospective application is urgent, meaning:
(a) there is a risk to the life, liberty or physical safety of the applicant or his or her
family or his or her home; or
(b) any delay caused by attending a Mediation Information and Assessment Meeting
would cause a risk of significant harm to a child, a significant risk of a miscarriage
of justice, unreasonable hardship to the applicant or irretrievable problems in dealing
with the dispute (such as an Irretrievable loss of significant evidence).
11 There is current social services involvement as a result of child protection concerns in respect
of any child who would be the subject of the prospective application.
12 A child would be a party to the prospective application by virtue of Rule 12.3(1).
13 The applicant (or the applicant’s legal representative) contacts three mediators within
15 miles of the applicant’s home and none is able to conduct a Mediation Information and
Assessment Meeting within 15 working days of the date of contact.
Jordan Publishing
www.familylaw.co.uk