SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 31
Where Would You Want to Age?
Proposal: Establish for-profit PACE center in Nashville to
provide comprehensive care to 55+ population needing long
term support services
CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS SEEKING
80% Funding (20% already secured)
Synergy with:
• Established local HC network
• Insurer with local MC population
BENEFITS
6 year ROI – 153%
Expandable to other markets
Building $741,000
Equipment/Vans $880,000
Solvency Reserves $1,055,000
Working Capital $2,752,000
Total $5,427,000
Outline
PACE
Value Proposition
Company Missions
Key Success Factors
Market Trends
Competitive Edge
Financial Forecasts
Marketing and Sales Strategy
Performance Metrics and Goals
PACE - Nashville
PACE  Value Prop  Desc and Miss  Mkt Trends  Success Factors  Competitive Edge  Financial  Marketing  Performance Metrics
Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly
• CMS – Supported program, developed in 1970s
• First Medicare/ Medicaid waivers issued in 1990
• Became permanent recognized provider type for
Medicare/ Medicaid in 1997
• CMS removes non-profit ownership restriction in 2015
PACE - Nashville
• Will deliver all needed medical and supportive services
for participants
• Primary care – adult day care – home health and social
services – hospital and nursing – targeted interventions
Value Proposition to Participant
PACE  Value Prop  Desc and Miss  Mkt Trends  Success Factors  Competitive Edge  Financial  Marketing  Performance Metrics
“Live where you want, longer, safer,
better.”
• Will provide high-quality care in a more
desirable setting at a lower cost that current
nursing home-based
• Assuming full risk, PACE- Nashville will be
unfettered by Medicare/ Medicaid restrictions
on long-term care services and can deliver
targeted, proactive care, and non-medical
interventions in a highly customized fashion.
Value Proposition to Investors
PACE  Value Prop  Desc and Miss  Mkt Trends  Success Factors  Competitive Edge  Financial  Marketing  Performance Metrics
• Gain experience in geriatric population health through a
proven model of care
• Opportunity to co-develop and scale PACE in multiple
markets to lower cost, improve experience and increase
options for enrollees
• Effectively manage the care of Dual-eligible population
in managed care program
United Healthcare
• Develop partnerships to reduce risk in transition to VBP
environment, HRRP Initiatives, Payment bundling
• Opportunity to scale program to multiple markets
• Community impact in Nashville
Hospital Corporation of America
Mission Statements
PACE -
Nashville
UHC
Our mission is to help people live
healthier lives and to help make the
health system work better for
everyone.
HCA
Above all else, we are committed to
the care and improvement of human
life. In recognition of this commitment,
we will strive to deliver high quality,
cost-effective healthcare in the
communities we serve.
PACE  Value Prop  Desc and Miss  Mkt Trends  Success Factors  Competitive Edge  Financial  Marketing  Performance Metrics
Market Trends
PACE
Aging
Pop
Risk
TechnologyCosts
Quality
PACE  Value Prop  Desc and Miss  Mkt Trends  Success Factors  Competitive Edge  Financial  Marketing  Performance Metrics
Key Success Factors
Sufficient Demand
Less Long-Term Care Competitors
Strong State Support
Adequate Capitation Rates
Adequate Startup Capitalization
Strong Clinical and Financial Risk Management Strategies
PACE  Value Prop  Desc and Miss  Mkt Trends  Success Factors  Competitive Edge  Financial  Marketing  Performance Metrics
Competitive Advantages
Treatment model coordinates complex care – no dropped balls
Capitated payments incentivizes cost effective care
Demonstrated value – higher quality care at lower cost
Proven track record at maintaining participant independence
Price and quality transparency
PACE  Value Prop  Desc and Miss  Mkt Trends  Success Factors  Competitive Edge  Financial  Marketing  Performance Metrics
0
$1,988,482
$5,822,882
$9,304,230
$12,399,738
$14,468,082
1
USDollars
Revenue Growth
PACE - Nashville: Revenue
Start-Up Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
PACE  Value Prop  Desc and Miss  Mkt Trends  Success Factors  Competitive Edge  Financial  Marketing  Performance Metrics
$-717,489
$-1,624,767
$-507,343
$222,159
$855,203
$1,249,706
1
PACE - Nashville: Net Income
Start-Up Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
PACE  Value Prop  Desc and Miss  Mkt Trends  Success Factors  Competitive Edge  Financial  Marketing  Performance Metrics
PACE  Value Prop  Desc and Miss  Mkt Trends  Success Factors  Competitive Edge  Financial  Marketing  Performance Metrics
$3,330,543
$1,283,342
$314,544
$159,320
$770,545
$2,070,416
1
PACE – Nashville: End of Year Cash on Hand
Startup Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
Target Market & Program
Size Estimate
• Davidson County only
• Target Market = Medicare+LTSS
• CMS+TennCare data
• Program Size:
• Market Penetration Estimates
• FBDE – 20%
• Others – 10%
• Geographic Limitations – 10 mile
Radius
• Market Segments
• Families/Participants
• Discharge Planners
• Geriatricians
• AAAD
64,000
Medicare
11,021
Total LTSS
population
1314
(Penetration
Losses)
825
(location
limits)
PACE  Value Prop  Desc and Miss  Mkt Trends  Success Factors  Competitive Edge  Financial  Marketing  Performance Metrics
Marketing/Sales Strategy
• Direct to consumers:
• “You shouldn’t have to choose between your home and your health”
• Outdoor Advertisements: Transport Vans, EOB Paperwork
• Acute facility discharge planners:
• “One stop shop for all inclusive care without being tied to a facility”
• Building relationships via Direct Outreach by Sales and Marketing Coordinator
• Other geriatric referral sources:
• Primary Care, Area Agency on Aging and Disabilities, and Tennessee’s
Medicaid program
• “Value of a nationally validated model of care designed for this population”
• Building relationships via Direct Outreach by Sales and Marketing Coordinator
PACE  Value Prop  Desc and Miss  Mkt Trends  Success Factors  Competitive Edge  Financial  Marketing  Performance Metrics
Performance Metrics – Balanced Scorecard
Marketing
New Starts
Telephone Contacts
Conversion Rate
Referral Source
Quality Care/Satisfaction
Hospital Admission Rate
30 Day Readmission Rate
% Nursing Home Days
Disenrollment Rate
Financial
Days in AR
Days Cash on Hand
Operating Expenses per
Participant
Operating Margin
Human Resources
Staff Turnover Rate
Staff Satisfaction Score
Contract Hours
PACE  Value Prop  Desc and Miss  Mkt Trends  Success Factors  Competitive Edge  Financial  Marketing  Performance Metrics
Time
(months)
Objectives
12 60 Enrollees
24 98% success rate at preventing nursing home admissions
Superior healthcare outcomes (Hospital readmission rate,
LOS, immunization rates) compared to usual care
30 Financial break even
36 150 enrollees
60 Two centers serving 250 to 300 enrollees
Revenue of 15 million dollars with 10% margin
Expanded program open to private-pay participants
Goal
Over a three-year period, PACE-Nashville will establish itself as the premier
source of all-inclusive care for our target population, those 55+ in need of
nursing home services who could safely remain at home with home and
community based services.
PACE  Value Prop  Desc and Miss  Mkt Trends  Success Factors  Competitive Edge  Financial  Marketing  Performance Metrics
• Expand Program
• Internal Funding
• Venture Capital
• Sale
• Liquidate
Long Term Exit Strategy
• Free Operating Cash Flow -
$13.7million/ROI – 153%
• Growth Rate – 3%
• Cost of Capital – 6.58%
• Beta – 0.92
• EBITDA multiples – 12-15 million
Valuation @ 6 Years
Proposal: Establish for-profit PACE center in Nashville to
provide comprehensive care to 55+ population needing long
term support services
CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS SEEKING
80% Funding (20% already secured)
Synergy with:
• Established local HC network
• Insurer with local MC population
BENEFITS
6 year ROI – 153%
Expandable to other markets
Building $741,000
Equipment/Vans $880,000
Solvency Reserves $1,055,000
Working Capital $2,752,000
Total $5,427,000
Appendices
• LTSS Spending for HCBS by State Map
• Challenges
• NPA Pro Forma Model
• Start-Up Cost Assumptions
• Budget/Enrollment
• Summary P&L
• Summary Cash Flow
• Summary BS
• Volume Projections
• Effect of Growth Rate on NPV
• PESTLE Analysis
Challenges
State and TennCare
Nursing Home Industry
New Entrant
NPA High Level Financial Pro Forma Model
 Developed in 2003 immediately following PACE Expansion Initiative funded by grants from
Robert Wood Johnson and John A. Hartford Foundations.
 At that time, only 26 PACE programs existed. Currently there are 115 in 32 States, all of which
are NPA members.
 Model generates pro forma financials based on assumptions input schedule and presents a
baseline start-up scenario.
 Assumptions based on experiences with current operational PACE programs.
 Capitated revenue reflect actual Medicare/Medicaid by selected county.
 Expense assumptions reflect national median estimates derived from current operational
PACE programs.
PACE  Value Prop  Desc and Miss  Mkt Trends  Success Factors  Competitive Edge  Financial  Marketing  Performance Metrics
Start-Up Costs – Assumptions
NPA Guidelines
• PACE center lease $10 to $15 per sq. ft.
• Typical Size 10,000 to 12,000 sq. ft.
• Renovation Costs of $45 to $55 per sq. ft.
• Hardware/Software/EHR - $450,000.
• Equipment Purchases at $650 to $850 per
enrollee = $200,000.
• Vans at $60,000 New, $40,000 Used.
• Solvency Reserves of $500,000 to $750,000.
PACE – Nashville
• Lease of $22 per sq. ft.
• Building size 13,000 sq. ft.
• Renovations of $57 per sq. ft.
• $450,000.
• Equipment Purchases of $130,000 ($850 x 153
enrollees).
• Vans All New (5 total).
• Solvency Reserves of $1,000,000.
NPA Guideline PACE - Nashville PACE - Chattanooga (Alexian Bros.)
Budget $1.5 - $5.6 mil $5.4 mil ('15) $3.5 mil ('98)
Initial Enrollment 6 to 9 7 8
Average Monthly Net 3 to 5 3 to 5 6.8 to 8.6 (actual)
End of Year
1 - 57 101 (actual)
2 - 105 224 (actual)
5 up to 300 225 -
BUDGET AND ENROLLMENT
SUMMARY DEPARTMENTAL PROFIT & LOSS STATEMENT
STARTUP YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
CY 2015-16 CY 2017 CY 2018 CY 2019 CY 2020 CY 2021
ENROLLMENT
Year End Enrollment 57 105 153 189 225
Average Daily Enrollment 29 83 131 173 199
Member Months 352 996 1,572 2,070 2,385
ATTENDANCE
Year End Daily Attendance 28 52 77 95 100
Average Daily Attendance 15 42 66 86 99
Attendance Days 3,813 10,790 17,030 22,425 25,838
REVENUES
Medicare $0 $893,043 $2,694,054 $4,315,812 $5,765,872 $6,747,754
Medicaid 0 1,095,439 3,128,828 4,988,418 6,633,866 7,720,328
Total Revenues 0 1,988,482 5,822,882 9,304,230 12,399,738 14,468,082
EXPENSES
Transportation 0 144,958 311,543 483,603 613,304 714,264
Meals 0 47,875 145,041 202,056 255,727 283,771
Social Services 4,075 116,224 190,045 266,668 329,224 388,126
Therapy 0 133,352 332,139 371,918 511,252 534,679
PACE Adult Day Center 28,625 249,358 359,712 495,079 560,010 632,809
Home Care 6,102 243,266 478,472 783,530 959,298 1,094,369
Pharmacy 0 237,536 692,283 1,125,419 1,526,403 1,811,442
PACE Center Primary Care 49,988 461,087 623,100 800,479 994,475 1,020,456
Outpatient Specialist 0 69,778 276,607 446,968 595,886 703,332
Labs and Diagnostics 0 17,445 50,347 81,053 108,865 127,940
Nursing Home 0 87,120 364,690 766,913 1,267,491 1,762,985
Hospital 0 211,370 547,947 782,164 983,414 1,076,829
Housing 0 27,254 78,658 126,630 170,081 199,882
Administrative 494,776 805,396 1,001,179 1,355,538 1,571,889 1,693,848
Marketing 51,673 149,628 152,620 155,673 158,786 161,962
Insurance 5,250 53,593 92,882 128,105 158,661 178,250
Facility 77,000 314,160 320,443 326,852 333,389 340,057
Pastoral Care 0 15,033 15,333 15,640 15,953 16,272
DME/Supplies 0 29,884 86,248 138,849 186,494 219,170
Depreciation 0 198,933 210,933 228,933 243,933 257,933
Interest 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Expenses 717,489 3,613,249 6,330,225 9,082,071 11,544,535 13,218,376
Net Income (Loss) -717,489 -1,624,767 -507,343 222,159 855,203 1,249,706
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
STARTUP YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
CY 2015-16 CY 2017 CY 2018 CY 2019 CY 2020 CY 2021
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Increase (decrease) in net assets ($717,489) ($1,624,767) ($507,343) $222,159 $855,203 $1,249,706
Add back non-cash Items:
Depreciation & Amortization 0 198,933 210,933 228,933 243,933 257,933
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable 0 -317,103 -288,760 -287,692 -225,390 -78,233
Accounts payable 61,486 129,827 139,197 148,988 131,158 61,443
Cash Reserve 0 (434,091) (402,825) (407,612) (333,679) (130,978)
Cash from operating activities -656,003 -2,047,201 -848,798 -95,224 671,225 1,359,871
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Acquisition of buildings, equipment, and vans -1,441,000 0 -120,000 -60,000 -60,000 -60,000
Cash from investing activities -1,441,000 0 -120,000 -60,000 -60,000 -60,000
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Ownership Contribution 5,427,546 0 0
Repayments of long term debt 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cash from financing activities 5,427,546 0 0 0 0 0
Net increase (decrease) in cash 3,330,543 -2,047,201 -968,798 -155,224 611,225 1,299,871
Cash, beginning of year 0 3,330,543 1,283,342 314,544 159,320 770,545
Cash, end of year 3,330,543 1,283,342 314,544 159,320 770,545 2,070,416
BALANCE SHEET - PACE Nashville
Years Ending December 31 FUNDING STARTUP YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
CY 2015-16 CY 2017 CY 2018 CY 2019 CY 2020 CY 2021
ASSETS
Current:
Cash 5,427,546 $3,330,543 1,283,342 314,544 159,320 $770,545 $2,070,416
Cash reserve 0 434,091 836,916 1,244,528 1,578,206 1,709,184
Accounts receivable 0 317,103 605,864 893,556 1,118,946 1,197,179
Total current assets 0 2,034,536 1,757,324 2,297,404 3,467,697 4,976,779
Fixed:
Buildings and equipment,net 1,441,000 1,242,067 1,151,133 982,200 798,267 600,333
1,242,067 1,151,133 982,200 798,267 600,333
Total assets 4,771,543 3,276,603 2,908,457 3,279,604 4,265,964 5,577,112
LIABILITIES AND NET ASSETS
Liabilities:
Accounts payable 61,486 191,313 330,510 479,498 610,655 672,099
Long term debt 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Liabilities 61,486 191,313 330,510 479,498 610,655 672,099
Net Assets:
Net assets - beginning of the period 5,427,546 5,427,546 4,710,057 3,085,290 2,577,947 2,800,106 3,655,309
Net income (loss) 0 -717,489 -1,624,767 -507,343 222,159 855,203 1,249,706
Paid-In Capital 5,427,546 5,427,546 5,427,546 5,427,546 5,427,546 5,427,546 5,427,546
Retained Earnings 0 -717,489 -2,342,256 -2,849,599 -2,627,440 -1,772,237 -522,531
Shareholder Equity 5,427,546 4,710,057 3,085,290 2,577,947 2,800,106 3,655,309 4,905,015
Total Liabilities and Shareholder Equity 4,771,543 3,276,603 2,908,457 3,279,604 4,265,964 5,577,114
Volume Projections
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Volume
Quarter
Projected Volumes PACE-Nashville
Baseline Best Case Worst Case Conservative FP Estimates
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
Beginning Enrollment 7
Monthly net Enrollment 5 4 4 3 3
End of Year Enrollment 62 110 158 194 230
Growth Rate NPV 6 year ROI
0% $9,017,520 66%
1% 10,023,223 85%
2% 11,468,098 111%
3% 13,720,165 153%
4% 17,718,021 226%
5% 26,776,454 393%
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6%
Millionsof$
Growth Rate
Effect of Growth Rate on NPV
Environmental
- Davidson County Growth
Political
- Need to address cost of health
care
- Medicaid budget considerations
- Pushback from Nursing Home
Association/Managed Care
providers
Economic
- Risk-based care/population
health
- Reduced reimbursement
- Drug costs for new meds
- Hospital costs
- Price and Quality Transparency
Social
- Aging population/Baby Boomers –
80% increase in >60 population
by 2040
- Two worker families (no caretaker
at home)
- Desire to remain at home in
elderly
Technological
- Home monitoring devices
- Communications devices
- Healthcare analytics
- EHR development
Legal
- CMS regulations
- Quality Metrics
- Advertising regulations
- PACE regulations
- TennCare regulations
PACE -
Nashville
PESTLE Analysis

More Related Content

What's hot

Current resume mary_elizabeth_garden
Current resume  mary_elizabeth_gardenCurrent resume  mary_elizabeth_garden
Current resume mary_elizabeth_gardenMary Elizabeth Garden
 
Presentation winning strategies for shared services in the public sector
Presentation winning strategies for shared services in the public sectorPresentation winning strategies for shared services in the public sector
Presentation winning strategies for shared services in the public sectorChazey Partners
 
Chi Sigma Consulting - Pitch Deck
Chi Sigma Consulting - Pitch DeckChi Sigma Consulting - Pitch Deck
Chi Sigma Consulting - Pitch DeckMarina Jeon
 
Matt Hutchison resume 2016
Matt Hutchison resume 2016Matt Hutchison resume 2016
Matt Hutchison resume 2016Matt Hutchison
 
Why shared services for the higher education, but why not?
Why shared services for the higher education, but why not?Why shared services for the higher education, but why not?
Why shared services for the higher education, but why not?Chazey Partners
 
Korey Keling Resume Dec 2015
Korey Keling Resume Dec 2015Korey Keling Resume Dec 2015
Korey Keling Resume Dec 2015Korey Keling
 
Arnie albert sr. healthcare leader resume 05. 2012
Arnie albert sr. healthcare leader resume  05. 2012Arnie albert sr. healthcare leader resume  05. 2012
Arnie albert sr. healthcare leader resume 05. 2012Arnie Albert
 
Dental Financial Life-Cycle
Dental Financial Life-CycleDental Financial Life-Cycle
Dental Financial Life-CyclePixelSpoke
 
HTS3 - 45YearsofResults
HTS3 - 45YearsofResultsHTS3 - 45YearsofResults
HTS3 - 45YearsofResultsDerek Morkel
 

What's hot (9)

Current resume mary_elizabeth_garden
Current resume  mary_elizabeth_gardenCurrent resume  mary_elizabeth_garden
Current resume mary_elizabeth_garden
 
Presentation winning strategies for shared services in the public sector
Presentation winning strategies for shared services in the public sectorPresentation winning strategies for shared services in the public sector
Presentation winning strategies for shared services in the public sector
 
Chi Sigma Consulting - Pitch Deck
Chi Sigma Consulting - Pitch DeckChi Sigma Consulting - Pitch Deck
Chi Sigma Consulting - Pitch Deck
 
Matt Hutchison resume 2016
Matt Hutchison resume 2016Matt Hutchison resume 2016
Matt Hutchison resume 2016
 
Why shared services for the higher education, but why not?
Why shared services for the higher education, but why not?Why shared services for the higher education, but why not?
Why shared services for the higher education, but why not?
 
Korey Keling Resume Dec 2015
Korey Keling Resume Dec 2015Korey Keling Resume Dec 2015
Korey Keling Resume Dec 2015
 
Arnie albert sr. healthcare leader resume 05. 2012
Arnie albert sr. healthcare leader resume  05. 2012Arnie albert sr. healthcare leader resume  05. 2012
Arnie albert sr. healthcare leader resume 05. 2012
 
Dental Financial Life-Cycle
Dental Financial Life-CycleDental Financial Life-Cycle
Dental Financial Life-Cycle
 
HTS3 - 45YearsofResults
HTS3 - 45YearsofResultsHTS3 - 45YearsofResults
HTS3 - 45YearsofResults
 

Similar to Final_Master_BP_Presentation (1)

Challenges and Solutions in the Changing Landscape of Healthcare - Michael Kr...
Challenges and Solutions in the Changing Landscape of Healthcare - Michael Kr...Challenges and Solutions in the Changing Landscape of Healthcare - Michael Kr...
Challenges and Solutions in the Changing Landscape of Healthcare - Michael Kr...Healthcare Network marcus evans
 
Capitation as a Means to Improve Financial Performance on Medicaid Patients-M...
Capitation as a Means to Improve Financial Performance on Medicaid Patients-M...Capitation as a Means to Improve Financial Performance on Medicaid Patients-M...
Capitation as a Means to Improve Financial Performance on Medicaid Patients-M...Healthcare Network marcus evans
 
Pitch deck- Bijana Healthcare Private Limited
Pitch deck- Bijana Healthcare Private LimitedPitch deck- Bijana Healthcare Private Limited
Pitch deck- Bijana Healthcare Private LimitedNagendra Prasad
 
An Analytics Journey: Case Study over Seven Years-Rich Pollack, VCU Health
An Analytics Journey: Case Study over Seven Years-Rich Pollack, VCU HealthAn Analytics Journey: Case Study over Seven Years-Rich Pollack, VCU Health
An Analytics Journey: Case Study over Seven Years-Rich Pollack, VCU HealthHealthcare Network marcus evans
 
Strategic formulation, intent & balance score card
Strategic formulation, intent & balance score cardStrategic formulation, intent & balance score card
Strategic formulation, intent & balance score cardVijay K S
 
CMS Bidding From Process to Strategy-August 24-25 2015-Paradise Point Resort ...
CMS Bidding From Process to Strategy-August 24-25 2015-Paradise Point Resort ...CMS Bidding From Process to Strategy-August 24-25 2015-Paradise Point Resort ...
CMS Bidding From Process to Strategy-August 24-25 2015-Paradise Point Resort ...Kyle Raeder
 
Dao Management Consulting Services, Inc.
Dao Management Consulting Services, Inc.Dao Management Consulting Services, Inc.
Dao Management Consulting Services, Inc.Helen Dao, BA MHA
 
Dao Management Consulting Services, Inc.
Dao Management Consulting Services, Inc.Dao Management Consulting Services, Inc.
Dao Management Consulting Services, Inc.Helen Dao, BA MHA
 
PPACA: Staying Compliant & Strategic
PPACA: Staying Compliant & StrategicPPACA: Staying Compliant & Strategic
PPACA: Staying Compliant & StrategicCBIZ, Inc.
 
STFM PI conf 12.4.15 Gerdes
STFM PI conf 12.4.15 GerdesSTFM PI conf 12.4.15 Gerdes
STFM PI conf 12.4.15 GerdesMelissa Gerdes
 
A Seven-Step Approach to a Clinically Integrated Network
A Seven-Step Approach to a Clinically Integrated NetworkA Seven-Step Approach to a Clinically Integrated Network
A Seven-Step Approach to a Clinically Integrated NetworkConifer Health Solutions
 
2013 10 utilizing member engagement to improve cahps scores
2013 10 utilizing member engagement to improve cahps scores2013 10 utilizing member engagement to improve cahps scores
2013 10 utilizing member engagement to improve cahps scoresimagine.GO
 
Edifecs CJR: don't fumble with your bundle ss
Edifecs CJR: don't fumble with your bundle ssEdifecs CJR: don't fumble with your bundle ss
Edifecs CJR: don't fumble with your bundle ssEdifecs Inc
 
Why Healthcare Costing Matters to Enable Strategy and Financial Performance
Why Healthcare Costing Matters to Enable Strategy and Financial PerformanceWhy Healthcare Costing Matters to Enable Strategy and Financial Performance
Why Healthcare Costing Matters to Enable Strategy and Financial PerformanceHealth Catalyst
 
How to achieve buy in adopting cdhp dallas hr conf
How to achieve buy in adopting cdhp dallas hr confHow to achieve buy in adopting cdhp dallas hr conf
How to achieve buy in adopting cdhp dallas hr confKelli Sewell
 
Proving the Value of Your Website
Proving the Value of Your WebsiteProving the Value of Your Website
Proving the Value of Your WebsiteGeonetric
 
Service Matters Ideas Lab Slide Deck
Service Matters Ideas Lab Slide DeckService Matters Ideas Lab Slide Deck
Service Matters Ideas Lab Slide DeckStephen Kerr
 
Innovative Solutions for Building Healthy Communities Presentation
Innovative Solutions for Building Healthy Communities PresentationInnovative Solutions for Building Healthy Communities Presentation
Innovative Solutions for Building Healthy Communities PresentationSalesforce.org
 

Similar to Final_Master_BP_Presentation (1) (20)

Challenges and Solutions in the Changing Landscape of Healthcare - Michael Kr...
Challenges and Solutions in the Changing Landscape of Healthcare - Michael Kr...Challenges and Solutions in the Changing Landscape of Healthcare - Michael Kr...
Challenges and Solutions in the Changing Landscape of Healthcare - Michael Kr...
 
Capitation as a Means to Improve Financial Performance on Medicaid Patients-M...
Capitation as a Means to Improve Financial Performance on Medicaid Patients-M...Capitation as a Means to Improve Financial Performance on Medicaid Patients-M...
Capitation as a Means to Improve Financial Performance on Medicaid Patients-M...
 
Pitch deck- Bijana Healthcare Private Limited
Pitch deck- Bijana Healthcare Private LimitedPitch deck- Bijana Healthcare Private Limited
Pitch deck- Bijana Healthcare Private Limited
 
An Analytics Journey: Case Study over Seven Years-Rich Pollack, VCU Health
An Analytics Journey: Case Study over Seven Years-Rich Pollack, VCU HealthAn Analytics Journey: Case Study over Seven Years-Rich Pollack, VCU Health
An Analytics Journey: Case Study over Seven Years-Rich Pollack, VCU Health
 
CEB November 2015_Miller ORiordan (final)
CEB November 2015_Miller ORiordan (final)CEB November 2015_Miller ORiordan (final)
CEB November 2015_Miller ORiordan (final)
 
Strategic formulation, intent & balance score card
Strategic formulation, intent & balance score cardStrategic formulation, intent & balance score card
Strategic formulation, intent & balance score card
 
CMS Bidding From Process to Strategy-August 24-25 2015-Paradise Point Resort ...
CMS Bidding From Process to Strategy-August 24-25 2015-Paradise Point Resort ...CMS Bidding From Process to Strategy-August 24-25 2015-Paradise Point Resort ...
CMS Bidding From Process to Strategy-August 24-25 2015-Paradise Point Resort ...
 
Dao Management Consulting Services, Inc.
Dao Management Consulting Services, Inc.Dao Management Consulting Services, Inc.
Dao Management Consulting Services, Inc.
 
Dao Management Consulting Services, Inc.
Dao Management Consulting Services, Inc.Dao Management Consulting Services, Inc.
Dao Management Consulting Services, Inc.
 
PPACA: Staying Compliant & Strategic
PPACA: Staying Compliant & StrategicPPACA: Staying Compliant & Strategic
PPACA: Staying Compliant & Strategic
 
STFM PI conf 12.4.15 Gerdes
STFM PI conf 12.4.15 GerdesSTFM PI conf 12.4.15 Gerdes
STFM PI conf 12.4.15 Gerdes
 
Evolving Business Models in Digital Health
Evolving Business Models in Digital HealthEvolving Business Models in Digital Health
Evolving Business Models in Digital Health
 
A Seven-Step Approach to a Clinically Integrated Network
A Seven-Step Approach to a Clinically Integrated NetworkA Seven-Step Approach to a Clinically Integrated Network
A Seven-Step Approach to a Clinically Integrated Network
 
2013 10 utilizing member engagement to improve cahps scores
2013 10 utilizing member engagement to improve cahps scores2013 10 utilizing member engagement to improve cahps scores
2013 10 utilizing member engagement to improve cahps scores
 
Edifecs CJR: don't fumble with your bundle ss
Edifecs CJR: don't fumble with your bundle ssEdifecs CJR: don't fumble with your bundle ss
Edifecs CJR: don't fumble with your bundle ss
 
Why Healthcare Costing Matters to Enable Strategy and Financial Performance
Why Healthcare Costing Matters to Enable Strategy and Financial PerformanceWhy Healthcare Costing Matters to Enable Strategy and Financial Performance
Why Healthcare Costing Matters to Enable Strategy and Financial Performance
 
How to achieve buy in adopting cdhp dallas hr conf
How to achieve buy in adopting cdhp dallas hr confHow to achieve buy in adopting cdhp dallas hr conf
How to achieve buy in adopting cdhp dallas hr conf
 
Proving the Value of Your Website
Proving the Value of Your WebsiteProving the Value of Your Website
Proving the Value of Your Website
 
Service Matters Ideas Lab Slide Deck
Service Matters Ideas Lab Slide DeckService Matters Ideas Lab Slide Deck
Service Matters Ideas Lab Slide Deck
 
Innovative Solutions for Building Healthy Communities Presentation
Innovative Solutions for Building Healthy Communities PresentationInnovative Solutions for Building Healthy Communities Presentation
Innovative Solutions for Building Healthy Communities Presentation
 

Final_Master_BP_Presentation (1)

  • 1. Where Would You Want to Age?
  • 2. Proposal: Establish for-profit PACE center in Nashville to provide comprehensive care to 55+ population needing long term support services CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS SEEKING 80% Funding (20% already secured) Synergy with: • Established local HC network • Insurer with local MC population BENEFITS 6 year ROI – 153% Expandable to other markets Building $741,000 Equipment/Vans $880,000 Solvency Reserves $1,055,000 Working Capital $2,752,000 Total $5,427,000
  • 3. Outline PACE Value Proposition Company Missions Key Success Factors Market Trends Competitive Edge Financial Forecasts Marketing and Sales Strategy Performance Metrics and Goals
  • 4. PACE - Nashville PACE  Value Prop  Desc and Miss  Mkt Trends  Success Factors  Competitive Edge  Financial  Marketing  Performance Metrics Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly • CMS – Supported program, developed in 1970s • First Medicare/ Medicaid waivers issued in 1990 • Became permanent recognized provider type for Medicare/ Medicaid in 1997 • CMS removes non-profit ownership restriction in 2015 PACE - Nashville • Will deliver all needed medical and supportive services for participants • Primary care – adult day care – home health and social services – hospital and nursing – targeted interventions
  • 5. Value Proposition to Participant PACE  Value Prop  Desc and Miss  Mkt Trends  Success Factors  Competitive Edge  Financial  Marketing  Performance Metrics “Live where you want, longer, safer, better.” • Will provide high-quality care in a more desirable setting at a lower cost that current nursing home-based • Assuming full risk, PACE- Nashville will be unfettered by Medicare/ Medicaid restrictions on long-term care services and can deliver targeted, proactive care, and non-medical interventions in a highly customized fashion.
  • 6. Value Proposition to Investors PACE  Value Prop  Desc and Miss  Mkt Trends  Success Factors  Competitive Edge  Financial  Marketing  Performance Metrics • Gain experience in geriatric population health through a proven model of care • Opportunity to co-develop and scale PACE in multiple markets to lower cost, improve experience and increase options for enrollees • Effectively manage the care of Dual-eligible population in managed care program United Healthcare • Develop partnerships to reduce risk in transition to VBP environment, HRRP Initiatives, Payment bundling • Opportunity to scale program to multiple markets • Community impact in Nashville Hospital Corporation of America
  • 7. Mission Statements PACE - Nashville UHC Our mission is to help people live healthier lives and to help make the health system work better for everyone. HCA Above all else, we are committed to the care and improvement of human life. In recognition of this commitment, we will strive to deliver high quality, cost-effective healthcare in the communities we serve. PACE  Value Prop  Desc and Miss  Mkt Trends  Success Factors  Competitive Edge  Financial  Marketing  Performance Metrics
  • 8. Market Trends PACE Aging Pop Risk TechnologyCosts Quality PACE  Value Prop  Desc and Miss  Mkt Trends  Success Factors  Competitive Edge  Financial  Marketing  Performance Metrics
  • 9. Key Success Factors Sufficient Demand Less Long-Term Care Competitors Strong State Support Adequate Capitation Rates Adequate Startup Capitalization Strong Clinical and Financial Risk Management Strategies PACE  Value Prop  Desc and Miss  Mkt Trends  Success Factors  Competitive Edge  Financial  Marketing  Performance Metrics
  • 10. Competitive Advantages Treatment model coordinates complex care – no dropped balls Capitated payments incentivizes cost effective care Demonstrated value – higher quality care at lower cost Proven track record at maintaining participant independence Price and quality transparency PACE  Value Prop  Desc and Miss  Mkt Trends  Success Factors  Competitive Edge  Financial  Marketing  Performance Metrics
  • 11. 0 $1,988,482 $5,822,882 $9,304,230 $12,399,738 $14,468,082 1 USDollars Revenue Growth PACE - Nashville: Revenue Start-Up Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 PACE  Value Prop  Desc and Miss  Mkt Trends  Success Factors  Competitive Edge  Financial  Marketing  Performance Metrics
  • 12. $-717,489 $-1,624,767 $-507,343 $222,159 $855,203 $1,249,706 1 PACE - Nashville: Net Income Start-Up Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 PACE  Value Prop  Desc and Miss  Mkt Trends  Success Factors  Competitive Edge  Financial  Marketing  Performance Metrics
  • 13. PACE  Value Prop  Desc and Miss  Mkt Trends  Success Factors  Competitive Edge  Financial  Marketing  Performance Metrics $3,330,543 $1,283,342 $314,544 $159,320 $770,545 $2,070,416 1 PACE – Nashville: End of Year Cash on Hand Startup Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
  • 14. Target Market & Program Size Estimate • Davidson County only • Target Market = Medicare+LTSS • CMS+TennCare data • Program Size: • Market Penetration Estimates • FBDE – 20% • Others – 10% • Geographic Limitations – 10 mile Radius • Market Segments • Families/Participants • Discharge Planners • Geriatricians • AAAD 64,000 Medicare 11,021 Total LTSS population 1314 (Penetration Losses) 825 (location limits) PACE  Value Prop  Desc and Miss  Mkt Trends  Success Factors  Competitive Edge  Financial  Marketing  Performance Metrics
  • 15. Marketing/Sales Strategy • Direct to consumers: • “You shouldn’t have to choose between your home and your health” • Outdoor Advertisements: Transport Vans, EOB Paperwork • Acute facility discharge planners: • “One stop shop for all inclusive care without being tied to a facility” • Building relationships via Direct Outreach by Sales and Marketing Coordinator • Other geriatric referral sources: • Primary Care, Area Agency on Aging and Disabilities, and Tennessee’s Medicaid program • “Value of a nationally validated model of care designed for this population” • Building relationships via Direct Outreach by Sales and Marketing Coordinator PACE  Value Prop  Desc and Miss  Mkt Trends  Success Factors  Competitive Edge  Financial  Marketing  Performance Metrics
  • 16. Performance Metrics – Balanced Scorecard Marketing New Starts Telephone Contacts Conversion Rate Referral Source Quality Care/Satisfaction Hospital Admission Rate 30 Day Readmission Rate % Nursing Home Days Disenrollment Rate Financial Days in AR Days Cash on Hand Operating Expenses per Participant Operating Margin Human Resources Staff Turnover Rate Staff Satisfaction Score Contract Hours PACE  Value Prop  Desc and Miss  Mkt Trends  Success Factors  Competitive Edge  Financial  Marketing  Performance Metrics
  • 17. Time (months) Objectives 12 60 Enrollees 24 98% success rate at preventing nursing home admissions Superior healthcare outcomes (Hospital readmission rate, LOS, immunization rates) compared to usual care 30 Financial break even 36 150 enrollees 60 Two centers serving 250 to 300 enrollees Revenue of 15 million dollars with 10% margin Expanded program open to private-pay participants Goal Over a three-year period, PACE-Nashville will establish itself as the premier source of all-inclusive care for our target population, those 55+ in need of nursing home services who could safely remain at home with home and community based services. PACE  Value Prop  Desc and Miss  Mkt Trends  Success Factors  Competitive Edge  Financial  Marketing  Performance Metrics
  • 18. • Expand Program • Internal Funding • Venture Capital • Sale • Liquidate Long Term Exit Strategy • Free Operating Cash Flow - $13.7million/ROI – 153% • Growth Rate – 3% • Cost of Capital – 6.58% • Beta – 0.92 • EBITDA multiples – 12-15 million Valuation @ 6 Years
  • 19. Proposal: Establish for-profit PACE center in Nashville to provide comprehensive care to 55+ population needing long term support services CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS SEEKING 80% Funding (20% already secured) Synergy with: • Established local HC network • Insurer with local MC population BENEFITS 6 year ROI – 153% Expandable to other markets Building $741,000 Equipment/Vans $880,000 Solvency Reserves $1,055,000 Working Capital $2,752,000 Total $5,427,000
  • 20. Appendices • LTSS Spending for HCBS by State Map • Challenges • NPA Pro Forma Model • Start-Up Cost Assumptions • Budget/Enrollment • Summary P&L • Summary Cash Flow • Summary BS • Volume Projections • Effect of Growth Rate on NPV • PESTLE Analysis
  • 21.
  • 22. Challenges State and TennCare Nursing Home Industry New Entrant
  • 23. NPA High Level Financial Pro Forma Model  Developed in 2003 immediately following PACE Expansion Initiative funded by grants from Robert Wood Johnson and John A. Hartford Foundations.  At that time, only 26 PACE programs existed. Currently there are 115 in 32 States, all of which are NPA members.  Model generates pro forma financials based on assumptions input schedule and presents a baseline start-up scenario.  Assumptions based on experiences with current operational PACE programs.  Capitated revenue reflect actual Medicare/Medicaid by selected county.  Expense assumptions reflect national median estimates derived from current operational PACE programs. PACE  Value Prop  Desc and Miss  Mkt Trends  Success Factors  Competitive Edge  Financial  Marketing  Performance Metrics
  • 24. Start-Up Costs – Assumptions NPA Guidelines • PACE center lease $10 to $15 per sq. ft. • Typical Size 10,000 to 12,000 sq. ft. • Renovation Costs of $45 to $55 per sq. ft. • Hardware/Software/EHR - $450,000. • Equipment Purchases at $650 to $850 per enrollee = $200,000. • Vans at $60,000 New, $40,000 Used. • Solvency Reserves of $500,000 to $750,000. PACE – Nashville • Lease of $22 per sq. ft. • Building size 13,000 sq. ft. • Renovations of $57 per sq. ft. • $450,000. • Equipment Purchases of $130,000 ($850 x 153 enrollees). • Vans All New (5 total). • Solvency Reserves of $1,000,000.
  • 25. NPA Guideline PACE - Nashville PACE - Chattanooga (Alexian Bros.) Budget $1.5 - $5.6 mil $5.4 mil ('15) $3.5 mil ('98) Initial Enrollment 6 to 9 7 8 Average Monthly Net 3 to 5 3 to 5 6.8 to 8.6 (actual) End of Year 1 - 57 101 (actual) 2 - 105 224 (actual) 5 up to 300 225 - BUDGET AND ENROLLMENT
  • 26. SUMMARY DEPARTMENTAL PROFIT & LOSS STATEMENT STARTUP YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5 CY 2015-16 CY 2017 CY 2018 CY 2019 CY 2020 CY 2021 ENROLLMENT Year End Enrollment 57 105 153 189 225 Average Daily Enrollment 29 83 131 173 199 Member Months 352 996 1,572 2,070 2,385 ATTENDANCE Year End Daily Attendance 28 52 77 95 100 Average Daily Attendance 15 42 66 86 99 Attendance Days 3,813 10,790 17,030 22,425 25,838 REVENUES Medicare $0 $893,043 $2,694,054 $4,315,812 $5,765,872 $6,747,754 Medicaid 0 1,095,439 3,128,828 4,988,418 6,633,866 7,720,328 Total Revenues 0 1,988,482 5,822,882 9,304,230 12,399,738 14,468,082 EXPENSES Transportation 0 144,958 311,543 483,603 613,304 714,264 Meals 0 47,875 145,041 202,056 255,727 283,771 Social Services 4,075 116,224 190,045 266,668 329,224 388,126 Therapy 0 133,352 332,139 371,918 511,252 534,679 PACE Adult Day Center 28,625 249,358 359,712 495,079 560,010 632,809 Home Care 6,102 243,266 478,472 783,530 959,298 1,094,369 Pharmacy 0 237,536 692,283 1,125,419 1,526,403 1,811,442 PACE Center Primary Care 49,988 461,087 623,100 800,479 994,475 1,020,456 Outpatient Specialist 0 69,778 276,607 446,968 595,886 703,332 Labs and Diagnostics 0 17,445 50,347 81,053 108,865 127,940 Nursing Home 0 87,120 364,690 766,913 1,267,491 1,762,985 Hospital 0 211,370 547,947 782,164 983,414 1,076,829 Housing 0 27,254 78,658 126,630 170,081 199,882 Administrative 494,776 805,396 1,001,179 1,355,538 1,571,889 1,693,848 Marketing 51,673 149,628 152,620 155,673 158,786 161,962 Insurance 5,250 53,593 92,882 128,105 158,661 178,250 Facility 77,000 314,160 320,443 326,852 333,389 340,057 Pastoral Care 0 15,033 15,333 15,640 15,953 16,272 DME/Supplies 0 29,884 86,248 138,849 186,494 219,170 Depreciation 0 198,933 210,933 228,933 243,933 257,933 Interest 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Expenses 717,489 3,613,249 6,330,225 9,082,071 11,544,535 13,218,376 Net Income (Loss) -717,489 -1,624,767 -507,343 222,159 855,203 1,249,706
  • 27. STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS STARTUP YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5 CY 2015-16 CY 2017 CY 2018 CY 2019 CY 2020 CY 2021 OPERATING ACTIVITIES Increase (decrease) in net assets ($717,489) ($1,624,767) ($507,343) $222,159 $855,203 $1,249,706 Add back non-cash Items: Depreciation & Amortization 0 198,933 210,933 228,933 243,933 257,933 Changes in operating assets and liabilities: Accounts receivable 0 -317,103 -288,760 -287,692 -225,390 -78,233 Accounts payable 61,486 129,827 139,197 148,988 131,158 61,443 Cash Reserve 0 (434,091) (402,825) (407,612) (333,679) (130,978) Cash from operating activities -656,003 -2,047,201 -848,798 -95,224 671,225 1,359,871 INVESTING ACTIVITIES Acquisition of buildings, equipment, and vans -1,441,000 0 -120,000 -60,000 -60,000 -60,000 Cash from investing activities -1,441,000 0 -120,000 -60,000 -60,000 -60,000 FINANCING ACTIVITIES Ownership Contribution 5,427,546 0 0 Repayments of long term debt 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cash from financing activities 5,427,546 0 0 0 0 0 Net increase (decrease) in cash 3,330,543 -2,047,201 -968,798 -155,224 611,225 1,299,871 Cash, beginning of year 0 3,330,543 1,283,342 314,544 159,320 770,545 Cash, end of year 3,330,543 1,283,342 314,544 159,320 770,545 2,070,416
  • 28. BALANCE SHEET - PACE Nashville Years Ending December 31 FUNDING STARTUP YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5 CY 2015-16 CY 2017 CY 2018 CY 2019 CY 2020 CY 2021 ASSETS Current: Cash 5,427,546 $3,330,543 1,283,342 314,544 159,320 $770,545 $2,070,416 Cash reserve 0 434,091 836,916 1,244,528 1,578,206 1,709,184 Accounts receivable 0 317,103 605,864 893,556 1,118,946 1,197,179 Total current assets 0 2,034,536 1,757,324 2,297,404 3,467,697 4,976,779 Fixed: Buildings and equipment,net 1,441,000 1,242,067 1,151,133 982,200 798,267 600,333 1,242,067 1,151,133 982,200 798,267 600,333 Total assets 4,771,543 3,276,603 2,908,457 3,279,604 4,265,964 5,577,112 LIABILITIES AND NET ASSETS Liabilities: Accounts payable 61,486 191,313 330,510 479,498 610,655 672,099 Long term debt 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Liabilities 61,486 191,313 330,510 479,498 610,655 672,099 Net Assets: Net assets - beginning of the period 5,427,546 5,427,546 4,710,057 3,085,290 2,577,947 2,800,106 3,655,309 Net income (loss) 0 -717,489 -1,624,767 -507,343 222,159 855,203 1,249,706 Paid-In Capital 5,427,546 5,427,546 5,427,546 5,427,546 5,427,546 5,427,546 5,427,546 Retained Earnings 0 -717,489 -2,342,256 -2,849,599 -2,627,440 -1,772,237 -522,531 Shareholder Equity 5,427,546 4,710,057 3,085,290 2,577,947 2,800,106 3,655,309 4,905,015 Total Liabilities and Shareholder Equity 4,771,543 3,276,603 2,908,457 3,279,604 4,265,964 5,577,114
  • 29. Volume Projections 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Volume Quarter Projected Volumes PACE-Nashville Baseline Best Case Worst Case Conservative FP Estimates Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Beginning Enrollment 7 Monthly net Enrollment 5 4 4 3 3 End of Year Enrollment 62 110 158 194 230
  • 30. Growth Rate NPV 6 year ROI 0% $9,017,520 66% 1% 10,023,223 85% 2% 11,468,098 111% 3% 13,720,165 153% 4% 17,718,021 226% 5% 26,776,454 393% 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% Millionsof$ Growth Rate Effect of Growth Rate on NPV
  • 31. Environmental - Davidson County Growth Political - Need to address cost of health care - Medicaid budget considerations - Pushback from Nursing Home Association/Managed Care providers Economic - Risk-based care/population health - Reduced reimbursement - Drug costs for new meds - Hospital costs - Price and Quality Transparency Social - Aging population/Baby Boomers – 80% increase in >60 population by 2040 - Two worker families (no caretaker at home) - Desire to remain at home in elderly Technological - Home monitoring devices - Communications devices - Healthcare analytics - EHR development Legal - CMS regulations - Quality Metrics - Advertising regulations - PACE regulations - TennCare regulations PACE - Nashville PESTLE Analysis

Editor's Notes

  1. wes
  2. wes
  3. wes
  4. Sean
  5. Sean
  6. Sean
  7. Sean
  8. Emily
  9. Emily
  10. wes
  11. pat
  12. Pat - Break-even in Q10 (May-June, 2019)
  13. Pat –
  14. Kevin
  15. Kevin
  16. Kevin
  17. Kevin
  18. Kevin
  19. wes
  20. wes