SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 44
Prepared by:
Laxman Gurung
Mohini Khyen
Niva Pradhan
Situ Sainju
Sanim Bajracharya
Sunir Lakhe
Group: P
Project Supervisor:
Er. Ram Gopal Kharbuja
FINAL PRESENTATION
 Nepal is a developing country with huge
hydropower potential.
 Hydropower is the most reliable and renewable
source of energy & abundantly available.
 Does not cause any green house gasses or
pollution
 Small HP project are feasible in our present
context due to less cost & quick output
1.1 Reasons for focusing on Hydropower Projects
 According to NEA based on power output
 1) Micro hydropower plant = <100KW
 2) Mini hydropower plant = 100KW-1MW
 3) Small hydropower plant = 1MW- 10MW
 4) Medium hydropower plant=10MW-300MW
 5) Large hydropower plant = > 300MW
1.2 Classification of Hydropower Project
Development region:Western
Zone: Gandaki
District: Gorkha
District headquarter: Gorkha
VDCs: Manbu
Longitude: 84° 53’ 00” to 84° 54’ 03” East
Latitude: 28° 10’ 08” to 28° 10’ 41” North
Type of scheme: Run of river (RoR)
Source river: Chhote Khola
General
EDC, HMG/N
W. Seti
Bheri
Kali
Gandaki
Trisuli
Marsayangdi
Burhi Gandaki
Arun
Sun Koshi
Dudh Koshi
Tama Koshi
Bagmati
Basin
Kankai
Basin
West Rapti
Babai
Sapta Koshi
Bhote
Koshi
Rapti
N
Upper Karnali
(300 MW)
Budhi Ganga
(22 MW)
Likhu Khola
(50 MW)
Tamur
(101 MW)
*
KATHMANDU
Rahughat Khola
(27 MW)
Kabeli ‘A’
(30 MW)
Dudh Koshi
(300 MW)
CHINA
INDIA
Andhi Khola
(5 MW)
Karnali (Chisapani)
(10,800 MW)
Bhote Khosi
(36 MW)
Kali Gandaki-2
(572 MW??)
West Seti
(750 MW)
Pancheshwar
(6,400 MW?)
Khimti Khola
(60 MW)
Jimruk
(12 MW)
Mahakali BasinLegend:
Karnali Basin
Gandaki Basin
Southern Rivers Basin
Gandaki Basin
Chhote Khola
Project Locat
Chhote Khola - tributary of Budhigandaki and
Budhigandaki - major tributary ofTrishuli River-Narayani
Perennial river
Originates from Chunar dada and Mandra dada hills with
the highest peak at elevation 4162m.
It is about 2 km upstream from the confluence with
Budigandaki.
Lies at about elevation of 895 m and located at about 1500
m upstream of the confluence with Budigandaki River.
The Chhote Khola basin drains towards east-west
direction
Catchment Physiography and Drainage
Reference Hydrology
Month Discharge(Q2)Days % Time exceedence Cumm Q2 Q1
Aug 441 31 8.333 8.333 441 4.43463687
Jul 412 31 8.333 16.667 412 4.14301676
Sept 317 30 8.333 25.000 317 3.1877095
Jun 228 30 8.333 33.333 228 2.29273743
Oct 155 31 8.333 41.667 155 1.55865922
45.000 135.4 1.36156425
May 106 30 8.333 50.000 106 1.06592179
Nov 81.1 30 8.333 58.333 81.1 0.81553073
Apr 59.1 30 8.333 66.667 59.1 0.59430168
Dec 50.3 31 8.333 75.000 50.3 0.50581006
Jan 36.3 31 8.333 83.333 36.3 0.36502793
Mar 35.9 31 8.333 91.667 35.9 0.36100559
Feb 31 28 8.333 100.000 31 0.31173184
In terms of month with reference to Budi Gandaki at Aru Ghat
Reference Hydrology
Month Discharge(Q2)Days % Time exceedence Cumm Q1
Aug 3.91 31 8.333 8.333 12.42
Sept 3 30 8.333 16.667 9.52941
Jul 2.77 31 8.333 25.000 8.79882
Oct 1.39 31 8.333 33.333 4.41529
Jun 0.914 30 8.333 41.667 2.90329
45.000 2.60598
Nov 0.68 30 8.333 50.000 2.16
Dec 0.458 31 8.333 58.333 1.45482
Jan 0.377 31 8.333 66.667 1.19753
May 0.356 30 8.333 75.000 1.13082
Feb 0.315 28 8.333 83.333 1.00059
Mar 0.287 31 8.333 91.667 0.91165
Apr 0.277 30 8.333 100.000 0.87988
In terms of Month with reference to Bagmati at Sundarijal
Q45 = 2.6 m3/s
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
0.000 20.000 40.000 60.000 80.000 100.000 120.000
Discharge(m3/s)
Time exceedence %
bagmati
budhi gandaki
 From above curve
discharge at 45%
exceedence = 2.6m3/s
 Hence our design
discharge = 2.6m3/s
Flood frequency at 100 years return period
 Gumbell 199.6 m3/s
 log pearson 287.71 m3/s
 log normal 166.117 m3/s
 DHM 365.84 m3/s
 Adopted log Pearson value : 287.71 m3/s
1.000
10.000
100.000
1000.000
10000.000
1 10 100 1000 10000
Dischargem3/s
Return Period
log normal
gumbel
log pearson
Catchment Area AtThe Intake 54 Km2
Gross Head 80 m
Design Discharge
2.6 m3/s @ 45%
Exceedence
Q100 (Design Flood) 287.71 m3/s
 P=ηγ QdH
 Taking,
η= 80%
γ=9810 N/m3
Qd= 2.6 m3/s
Net H=72 m (10% Head loss)
 Hence,
Power (P)=1.469 MW
 Gross head: 80 m
 Rated net head : 72 m
 Installed capacity: 1.469 MW
 Dry season energy: 3.23 GWh
 Wet season energy: 5.58 GWh
 Annual energy: 8.81 GWh
 Type = ogee shaped spillway
 High flood(Q100) = 287.71m3/s
 Flood pass through weir= 90% of Q100
= 259.119m3/s
 Height of weir = 4.3m
 Length of spillway = 10m
WEIR
INTAKE
GRAVELTRAP &
SETTLING BASIN
 No. of orifice = 2
 Width of orifice = 1.5m
 Height of orifice = 1.5m
 Type of gate = vertical gate
 Location = left bank
 Trash rack = 20mm thick bar 100mm c/c
spacing at 75o
 Discharge pass through orifice = 3.12m3/s
FIG: Plan of Weir
 Stone Lining
 Rectangular Stone Masonry
with cement mortar
 Cement Lining
 Plaster 20 mm
 Width = 2m
 Height = 1.0m
 Type: Gravity flushing type
 Overall length: 6.3 m
 Width: 2 m
 Overall depth: 1.3 m
 Particle size to be trapped: 2 mm
 Flushing flow: 0.31 m3/s
Flushing Pipe
 Diameter = 0.3m
 Slope=1:50
 Length= 18 m
 Type: Double chamber, continuous flushing type
 Settling zone length: 32.00 m
 Inlet transition length: 14.7 m
 Single basin width: 1.6 m
 Effective depth: 4.9 m
 Particle size to be settled: 0.2 mm with 90% settling
efficiency
 Design flow: 3.12 m3/s
 Settling velocity: 0.032m/s
Flushing Pipe
 Diameter= 0.214m
 Slope = 1:500
SPILLWAY in settling basin:
Type: Ogee
 Length=9m
 Breadth= 2m
 Height=4.9 m
Sectional view of settling basin
 Size : 1.7m x 0.9m
 Free board =0.3m
 Type: RCC tank
 Storage period: 180 s
 Effective length: 36.00 m
 Width: 2.5 m
 Effective depth: 5.2 m
 Normal water level: 970.2 m amsl
 Spillway:
 Type: ogee
 L = 8.3m
 B= 2m
 H=5.2m
Flush pipe dia= 0.2m
FlushingCanal=1 x 0.5 m
Air vent pipe: dia. 0.2m
 Type: Surface, mild steel circular shaped
 Length: 153 m
 Internal diameter: 1 m
 Thickness: 35 mm
 Design flow: 2.6 m3/s
 No. of anchor blocks: 7
 No. of support piers: 25
FOREBAY
PENSTOCKPOWER
HOUSE
TAIL RACE
FIG: L- SECTION OF PENSTOCK ALIGNMENT
Forebay
POWER
HOUSE
Anchor
Block
 SIZE:
 Length: 4m
 Breadth : 3m
 Height: 3
 Number :7
 Type: Surface type, RCC structure
 Length: 27.5 m
 Width: 6.5 m
 Height: 6.5 m
 Turbine axis level: 896m amsl
 Tailrace length: 10.0 m from after tailrace
junction
 Tailrace width: 1.0 m
 Tailrace depth: 0.50 m
FIG: PLAN SHOWING POWER HOUSE andTAIL RACE
Tail Race
Penstock
Power House
 Type: Francis (2 units)
 Rated capacity: 735 kW one unit
 Tail water level: 893.16 m amsl
 Rated flow: 1.3 m3/s for one unit
 Rated speed: 300 rpm
 Specific Speed ofTurbine: 62.4 rpm
S.No. Partiiculars Amount
1 Summary of Pre-operating expenses 2,800,000.00
2 Environmental cost, Land acquisition 1,800,000.00
3 Infrastructure Development (Access road and construction power) 32,500,000.00
4 Civil Construction Works 47,132,963.39
5 Hydromechanical Works 9,701,580.00
6 Electromechanical Works 13,173,300.00
7 Transmission line and interconnection facilities 12,600,000.00
8 Office and camping facilities 2,000,000.00
9 Office equipment and vehicle 3,000,000.00
10 Engineering, supervision, contract administration and management 6,175,000.00
11 Health and safety 700,000.00
Total Project Cost without financing 131,582,843.39
Interest During Construction 13,158,284.34
Total Project CostWith financing 144,741,127.73
Cost Per kW (US$) (1 US$=NRs. 85) 3,406
Summary of Pre-operating
expenses
2%
Environmental cost, Land acquisition
1%
Infrastructure Development (Access
road and construction power)
25%
Civil Construction Works
36%
Hydromechanical Works
7%
Electromechanical Works
10%
Transmission line and
interconnection facilities
10%
Office and camping facilities
1%
Office equipment and vehicle
2%
Engineering, supervision, contract
administration and management
5%
Health and
safety
1%
SUMMARY OF COST
 Project cost (with IDC, ): 144,741,127.73
Mill NRs
 Cost per kW (with IDC): 3855 US$
(with rate 1 US$= NRs. 85)
 Debt equity ratio: 70/30
 FIRR: 33.76%
 NPV: 112.87 Mill NRs
 BC ratio: 1.75
 Return on equity: 52.73%
 Auto CAD
 SW-DTM
 Microsoft Excel
 MicrosoftWord
Final

More Related Content

Similar to Final

Design and Development Solar Power Aeration System ppt.pdf
Design and Development Solar Power Aeration System  ppt.pdfDesign and Development Solar Power Aeration System  ppt.pdf
Design and Development Solar Power Aeration System ppt.pdfUtkarshFalak1
 
Attachment to KulekhanI–I Hydropower (BEL-069)
Attachment  to KulekhanI–I Hydropower (BEL-069)Attachment  to KulekhanI–I Hydropower (BEL-069)
Attachment to KulekhanI–I Hydropower (BEL-069)Kabindra Pokharel
 
Feasibility and Economic Design of Pumped Storage Hydropower Station
Feasibility and Economic Design of Pumped Storage Hydropower StationFeasibility and Economic Design of Pumped Storage Hydropower Station
Feasibility and Economic Design of Pumped Storage Hydropower StationAwais Marwat
 
3kw Propeller Turbine Blade Design Based on Tidal Range
3kw Propeller Turbine Blade Design Based on Tidal Range3kw Propeller Turbine Blade Design Based on Tidal Range
3kw Propeller Turbine Blade Design Based on Tidal Rangeijtsrd
 
IRJET- A Case Study and Design Approach for Sewage Treatment Plant in Kakuman...
IRJET- A Case Study and Design Approach for Sewage Treatment Plant in Kakuman...IRJET- A Case Study and Design Approach for Sewage Treatment Plant in Kakuman...
IRJET- A Case Study and Design Approach for Sewage Treatment Plant in Kakuman...IRJET Journal
 
Design water supply scheme
Design water supply schemeDesign water supply scheme
Design water supply schemeAby Mundackal
 
Final Evaluation
Final EvaluationFinal Evaluation
Final EvaluationShahroz Ali
 
Performance studies on a direct drive turbine for wave power generation in a ...
Performance studies on a direct drive turbine for wave power generation in a ...Performance studies on a direct drive turbine for wave power generation in a ...
Performance studies on a direct drive turbine for wave power generation in a ...Deepak Prasad
 
Design of Sewage Treatment Plant
Design of Sewage Treatment PlantDesign of Sewage Treatment Plant
Design of Sewage Treatment PlantPhurba Tamang
 
Seunguk-Lee-converted.pptx
Seunguk-Lee-converted.pptxSeunguk-Lee-converted.pptx
Seunguk-Lee-converted.pptxAmnaIqbal93
 
Innovative design of crossflow hydro turbine system.pdf
Innovative design of crossflow hydro turbine system.pdfInnovative design of crossflow hydro turbine system.pdf
Innovative design of crossflow hydro turbine system.pdfdngoma
 
Ultra Large Energy Storage System
Ultra Large Energy Storage SystemUltra Large Energy Storage System
Ultra Large Energy Storage SystemHEINDL ENERGY GmbH
 
THE VERTICAL APPROACH – TRANSITIONING FROM SAMPLING TO SUSTAINABLE MINING
THE VERTICAL APPROACH – TRANSITIONING FROM SAMPLING TO SUSTAINABLE MININGTHE VERTICAL APPROACH – TRANSITIONING FROM SAMPLING TO SUSTAINABLE MINING
THE VERTICAL APPROACH – TRANSITIONING FROM SAMPLING TO SUSTAINABLE MININGiQHub
 
Hydropower tutorial(1)
Hydropower tutorial(1)Hydropower tutorial(1)
Hydropower tutorial(1)Sivasakthi Vel
 
Design and fabrication of hydro electric power
Design and fabrication of hydro electric powerDesign and fabrication of hydro electric power
Design and fabrication of hydro electric powerkannan42
 

Similar to Final (20)

Srisailam project final
Srisailam project finalSrisailam project final
Srisailam project final
 
Design and Development Solar Power Aeration System ppt.pdf
Design and Development Solar Power Aeration System  ppt.pdfDesign and Development Solar Power Aeration System  ppt.pdf
Design and Development Solar Power Aeration System ppt.pdf
 
Attachment to KulekhanI–I Hydropower (BEL-069)
Attachment  to KulekhanI–I Hydropower (BEL-069)Attachment  to KulekhanI–I Hydropower (BEL-069)
Attachment to KulekhanI–I Hydropower (BEL-069)
 
Feasibility and Economic Design of Pumped Storage Hydropower Station
Feasibility and Economic Design of Pumped Storage Hydropower StationFeasibility and Economic Design of Pumped Storage Hydropower Station
Feasibility and Economic Design of Pumped Storage Hydropower Station
 
3kw Propeller Turbine Blade Design Based on Tidal Range
3kw Propeller Turbine Blade Design Based on Tidal Range3kw Propeller Turbine Blade Design Based on Tidal Range
3kw Propeller Turbine Blade Design Based on Tidal Range
 
تصمم.pptx
تصمم.pptxتصمم.pptx
تصمم.pptx
 
IRJET- A Case Study and Design Approach for Sewage Treatment Plant in Kakuman...
IRJET- A Case Study and Design Approach for Sewage Treatment Plant in Kakuman...IRJET- A Case Study and Design Approach for Sewage Treatment Plant in Kakuman...
IRJET- A Case Study and Design Approach for Sewage Treatment Plant in Kakuman...
 
5 ijsrms-02617 (1)
5 ijsrms-02617 (1)5 ijsrms-02617 (1)
5 ijsrms-02617 (1)
 
Design water supply scheme
Design water supply schemeDesign water supply scheme
Design water supply scheme
 
Final Evaluation
Final EvaluationFinal Evaluation
Final Evaluation
 
Performance studies on a direct drive turbine for wave power generation in a ...
Performance studies on a direct drive turbine for wave power generation in a ...Performance studies on a direct drive turbine for wave power generation in a ...
Performance studies on a direct drive turbine for wave power generation in a ...
 
Design of Sewage Treatment Plant
Design of Sewage Treatment PlantDesign of Sewage Treatment Plant
Design of Sewage Treatment Plant
 
Seunguk-Lee-converted.pptx
Seunguk-Lee-converted.pptxSeunguk-Lee-converted.pptx
Seunguk-Lee-converted.pptx
 
Innovative design of crossflow hydro turbine system.pdf
Innovative design of crossflow hydro turbine system.pdfInnovative design of crossflow hydro turbine system.pdf
Innovative design of crossflow hydro turbine system.pdf
 
project ppt
project pptproject ppt
project ppt
 
Ultra Large Energy Storage System
Ultra Large Energy Storage SystemUltra Large Energy Storage System
Ultra Large Energy Storage System
 
THE VERTICAL APPROACH – TRANSITIONING FROM SAMPLING TO SUSTAINABLE MINING
THE VERTICAL APPROACH – TRANSITIONING FROM SAMPLING TO SUSTAINABLE MININGTHE VERTICAL APPROACH – TRANSITIONING FROM SAMPLING TO SUSTAINABLE MINING
THE VERTICAL APPROACH – TRANSITIONING FROM SAMPLING TO SUSTAINABLE MINING
 
Assignment-10CV45.pdf
Assignment-10CV45.pdfAssignment-10CV45.pdf
Assignment-10CV45.pdf
 
Hydropower tutorial(1)
Hydropower tutorial(1)Hydropower tutorial(1)
Hydropower tutorial(1)
 
Design and fabrication of hydro electric power
Design and fabrication of hydro electric powerDesign and fabrication of hydro electric power
Design and fabrication of hydro electric power
 

Final

  • 1. Prepared by: Laxman Gurung Mohini Khyen Niva Pradhan Situ Sainju Sanim Bajracharya Sunir Lakhe Group: P Project Supervisor: Er. Ram Gopal Kharbuja FINAL PRESENTATION
  • 2.  Nepal is a developing country with huge hydropower potential.  Hydropower is the most reliable and renewable source of energy & abundantly available.  Does not cause any green house gasses or pollution  Small HP project are feasible in our present context due to less cost & quick output 1.1 Reasons for focusing on Hydropower Projects
  • 3.  According to NEA based on power output  1) Micro hydropower plant = <100KW  2) Mini hydropower plant = 100KW-1MW  3) Small hydropower plant = 1MW- 10MW  4) Medium hydropower plant=10MW-300MW  5) Large hydropower plant = > 300MW 1.2 Classification of Hydropower Project
  • 4. Development region:Western Zone: Gandaki District: Gorkha District headquarter: Gorkha VDCs: Manbu Longitude: 84° 53’ 00” to 84° 54’ 03” East Latitude: 28° 10’ 08” to 28° 10’ 41” North Type of scheme: Run of river (RoR) Source river: Chhote Khola General EDC, HMG/N W. Seti Bheri Kali Gandaki Trisuli Marsayangdi Burhi Gandaki Arun Sun Koshi Dudh Koshi Tama Koshi Bagmati Basin Kankai Basin West Rapti Babai Sapta Koshi Bhote Koshi Rapti N Upper Karnali (300 MW) Budhi Ganga (22 MW) Likhu Khola (50 MW) Tamur (101 MW) * KATHMANDU Rahughat Khola (27 MW) Kabeli ‘A’ (30 MW) Dudh Koshi (300 MW) CHINA INDIA Andhi Khola (5 MW) Karnali (Chisapani) (10,800 MW) Bhote Khosi (36 MW) Kali Gandaki-2 (572 MW??) West Seti (750 MW) Pancheshwar (6,400 MW?) Khimti Khola (60 MW) Jimruk (12 MW) Mahakali BasinLegend: Karnali Basin Gandaki Basin Southern Rivers Basin Gandaki Basin Chhote Khola Project Locat
  • 5. Chhote Khola - tributary of Budhigandaki and Budhigandaki - major tributary ofTrishuli River-Narayani Perennial river Originates from Chunar dada and Mandra dada hills with the highest peak at elevation 4162m. It is about 2 km upstream from the confluence with Budigandaki. Lies at about elevation of 895 m and located at about 1500 m upstream of the confluence with Budigandaki River. The Chhote Khola basin drains towards east-west direction Catchment Physiography and Drainage
  • 6. Reference Hydrology Month Discharge(Q2)Days % Time exceedence Cumm Q2 Q1 Aug 441 31 8.333 8.333 441 4.43463687 Jul 412 31 8.333 16.667 412 4.14301676 Sept 317 30 8.333 25.000 317 3.1877095 Jun 228 30 8.333 33.333 228 2.29273743 Oct 155 31 8.333 41.667 155 1.55865922 45.000 135.4 1.36156425 May 106 30 8.333 50.000 106 1.06592179 Nov 81.1 30 8.333 58.333 81.1 0.81553073 Apr 59.1 30 8.333 66.667 59.1 0.59430168 Dec 50.3 31 8.333 75.000 50.3 0.50581006 Jan 36.3 31 8.333 83.333 36.3 0.36502793 Mar 35.9 31 8.333 91.667 35.9 0.36100559 Feb 31 28 8.333 100.000 31 0.31173184 In terms of month with reference to Budi Gandaki at Aru Ghat
  • 7. Reference Hydrology Month Discharge(Q2)Days % Time exceedence Cumm Q1 Aug 3.91 31 8.333 8.333 12.42 Sept 3 30 8.333 16.667 9.52941 Jul 2.77 31 8.333 25.000 8.79882 Oct 1.39 31 8.333 33.333 4.41529 Jun 0.914 30 8.333 41.667 2.90329 45.000 2.60598 Nov 0.68 30 8.333 50.000 2.16 Dec 0.458 31 8.333 58.333 1.45482 Jan 0.377 31 8.333 66.667 1.19753 May 0.356 30 8.333 75.000 1.13082 Feb 0.315 28 8.333 83.333 1.00059 Mar 0.287 31 8.333 91.667 0.91165 Apr 0.277 30 8.333 100.000 0.87988 In terms of Month with reference to Bagmati at Sundarijal Q45 = 2.6 m3/s
  • 8. 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0.000 20.000 40.000 60.000 80.000 100.000 120.000 Discharge(m3/s) Time exceedence % bagmati budhi gandaki  From above curve discharge at 45% exceedence = 2.6m3/s  Hence our design discharge = 2.6m3/s
  • 9. Flood frequency at 100 years return period  Gumbell 199.6 m3/s  log pearson 287.71 m3/s  log normal 166.117 m3/s  DHM 365.84 m3/s  Adopted log Pearson value : 287.71 m3/s
  • 10. 1.000 10.000 100.000 1000.000 10000.000 1 10 100 1000 10000 Dischargem3/s Return Period log normal gumbel log pearson
  • 11. Catchment Area AtThe Intake 54 Km2 Gross Head 80 m Design Discharge 2.6 m3/s @ 45% Exceedence Q100 (Design Flood) 287.71 m3/s
  • 12.  P=ηγ QdH  Taking, η= 80% γ=9810 N/m3 Qd= 2.6 m3/s Net H=72 m (10% Head loss)  Hence, Power (P)=1.469 MW
  • 13.  Gross head: 80 m  Rated net head : 72 m  Installed capacity: 1.469 MW  Dry season energy: 3.23 GWh  Wet season energy: 5.58 GWh  Annual energy: 8.81 GWh
  • 14.  Type = ogee shaped spillway  High flood(Q100) = 287.71m3/s  Flood pass through weir= 90% of Q100 = 259.119m3/s  Height of weir = 4.3m  Length of spillway = 10m
  • 16.  No. of orifice = 2  Width of orifice = 1.5m  Height of orifice = 1.5m  Type of gate = vertical gate  Location = left bank  Trash rack = 20mm thick bar 100mm c/c spacing at 75o  Discharge pass through orifice = 3.12m3/s
  • 17. FIG: Plan of Weir
  • 18.  Stone Lining  Rectangular Stone Masonry with cement mortar  Cement Lining  Plaster 20 mm  Width = 2m  Height = 1.0m
  • 19.
  • 20.  Type: Gravity flushing type  Overall length: 6.3 m  Width: 2 m  Overall depth: 1.3 m  Particle size to be trapped: 2 mm  Flushing flow: 0.31 m3/s Flushing Pipe  Diameter = 0.3m  Slope=1:50  Length= 18 m
  • 21.
  • 22.
  • 23.  Type: Double chamber, continuous flushing type  Settling zone length: 32.00 m  Inlet transition length: 14.7 m  Single basin width: 1.6 m  Effective depth: 4.9 m  Particle size to be settled: 0.2 mm with 90% settling efficiency  Design flow: 3.12 m3/s  Settling velocity: 0.032m/s Flushing Pipe  Diameter= 0.214m  Slope = 1:500
  • 24. SPILLWAY in settling basin: Type: Ogee  Length=9m  Breadth= 2m  Height=4.9 m
  • 25.
  • 26. Sectional view of settling basin
  • 27.
  • 28.  Size : 1.7m x 0.9m  Free board =0.3m
  • 29.
  • 30.  Type: RCC tank  Storage period: 180 s  Effective length: 36.00 m  Width: 2.5 m  Effective depth: 5.2 m  Normal water level: 970.2 m amsl  Spillway:  Type: ogee  L = 8.3m  B= 2m  H=5.2m Flush pipe dia= 0.2m FlushingCanal=1 x 0.5 m Air vent pipe: dia. 0.2m
  • 31.
  • 32.
  • 33.  Type: Surface, mild steel circular shaped  Length: 153 m  Internal diameter: 1 m  Thickness: 35 mm  Design flow: 2.6 m3/s  No. of anchor blocks: 7  No. of support piers: 25
  • 35. FIG: L- SECTION OF PENSTOCK ALIGNMENT Forebay POWER HOUSE Anchor Block
  • 36.  SIZE:  Length: 4m  Breadth : 3m  Height: 3  Number :7
  • 37.  Type: Surface type, RCC structure  Length: 27.5 m  Width: 6.5 m  Height: 6.5 m  Turbine axis level: 896m amsl  Tailrace length: 10.0 m from after tailrace junction  Tailrace width: 1.0 m  Tailrace depth: 0.50 m
  • 38. FIG: PLAN SHOWING POWER HOUSE andTAIL RACE Tail Race Penstock Power House
  • 39.  Type: Francis (2 units)  Rated capacity: 735 kW one unit  Tail water level: 893.16 m amsl  Rated flow: 1.3 m3/s for one unit  Rated speed: 300 rpm  Specific Speed ofTurbine: 62.4 rpm
  • 40. S.No. Partiiculars Amount 1 Summary of Pre-operating expenses 2,800,000.00 2 Environmental cost, Land acquisition 1,800,000.00 3 Infrastructure Development (Access road and construction power) 32,500,000.00 4 Civil Construction Works 47,132,963.39 5 Hydromechanical Works 9,701,580.00 6 Electromechanical Works 13,173,300.00 7 Transmission line and interconnection facilities 12,600,000.00 8 Office and camping facilities 2,000,000.00 9 Office equipment and vehicle 3,000,000.00 10 Engineering, supervision, contract administration and management 6,175,000.00 11 Health and safety 700,000.00 Total Project Cost without financing 131,582,843.39 Interest During Construction 13,158,284.34 Total Project CostWith financing 144,741,127.73 Cost Per kW (US$) (1 US$=NRs. 85) 3,406
  • 41. Summary of Pre-operating expenses 2% Environmental cost, Land acquisition 1% Infrastructure Development (Access road and construction power) 25% Civil Construction Works 36% Hydromechanical Works 7% Electromechanical Works 10% Transmission line and interconnection facilities 10% Office and camping facilities 1% Office equipment and vehicle 2% Engineering, supervision, contract administration and management 5% Health and safety 1% SUMMARY OF COST
  • 42.  Project cost (with IDC, ): 144,741,127.73 Mill NRs  Cost per kW (with IDC): 3855 US$ (with rate 1 US$= NRs. 85)  Debt equity ratio: 70/30  FIRR: 33.76%  NPV: 112.87 Mill NRs  BC ratio: 1.75  Return on equity: 52.73%
  • 43.  Auto CAD  SW-DTM  Microsoft Excel  MicrosoftWord