This document provides a summary of the Marin County Family Support Blueprint. It lays out a vision for Marin County where children are cherished, families are supported, and communities thrive. The blueprint was developed with input from stakeholders to provide strategies and a framework for a coordinated family support system. It identifies strengths and needs of families in areas like economics, health, education, and community support. The blueprint proposes strategies at different levels to mobilize communities, influence policies, and better support families. It aims to guide policies and practices to help families be healthy, secure, and hopeful, especially in challenging economic times.
This document provides an overview of partnership opportunities between faith-based and neighborhood organizations and the federal government. It begins by introducing the White House Office of Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships and its role in coordinating partnerships across 13 federal agencies. The bulk of the document provides issue-specific sections on various policy areas where partnerships can be formed, such as strengthening adoption, disaster preparedness, education, economic opportunity, and more. Contact information is provided for each agency's Center for Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships.
The document provides an agenda and details for the California Primary Care Association's 2016 Annual Conference. Key points include:
- The conference will celebrate accomplishments of the past year and look towards future opportunities, with the theme "Together Towards Tomorrow."
- New this year is a CPCA beauty bar, non-stop photo studio, polling station for attendees to vote on best exhibitor booths, and a book signing with keynote speaker Dr. Bennet Omalu.
- The agenda includes breakout sessions, keynote presentations, an awards program, and a trade show and reception to network with industry contacts. Registration will utilize new self-check-in iPad stations to streamline the process.
We Care Connection is a nonprofit organization in Watsonville, California that aims to educate the community, assist with employment, and make a positive impact on people's lives. It provides services related to planned parenthood, domestic violence, aging, and education. The organization seeks to reduce Watsonville's historically high unemployment rate and obtain funding through sources like government grants, donations, fundraising events, corporations, and the United Way to support its programs and services. Its budget allocates funds toward salaries, operations, programming, and outcomes evaluation to fulfill its mission of empowering and serving the local community.
The budget summary provides an overview of JWB's revenues and expenditures for the current and next few fiscal years:
- Revenues are derived primarily from property taxes which make up around 90% of total revenues. Intergovernmental transfers also contribute several million dollars annually.
- Expenditures are focused on human services through funding of children and family programs. General government administrative costs are also included.
- The budget is balanced each year by applying fund balance reserves as needed to equal total revenues and expenditures. Maintaining service levels while keeping costs down remains a priority through inflationary cost pressures.
SS Chapter 2 - Governance in Singapore (Lesson 3 of 3)
In this lesson, we moved swiftly through Singapore's ageing population. We talked about what that meant for us in the future (more taxes!!!) and the 'Many Helping Hands' approach to deal with this problem.
Rick Santos, President and CEO, IMA World Health presents on partnerships to ensure full and sustainable global vaccine coverage at the CCIH 2018 conference.
The document discusses eliminating asset tests for eligibility in Medicaid and TANF programs in West Virginia. It argues that asset tests discourage saving and force families to spend down resources to qualify for assistance, hindering self-sufficiency. While states can modify asset tests, West Virginia has some of the strictest limits - $1,000 for Medicaid and $2,000 for TANF. Eliminating asset tests would allow families to save without losing benefits and could reduce program usage and administrative costs over time.
This document provides policy recommendations from the Massachusetts Commission on Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, and Questioning (LGBTQ) Youth for Fiscal Year 2015. It summarizes data showing health disparities experienced by LGBTQ youth such as higher rates of suicide attempts, homelessness, bullying, and substance abuse compared to non-LGBTQ youth. The Commission works with state agencies to develop policies and programs to better support the needs of LGBTQ youth. The recommendations target agencies involved in health and human services, education, housing, employment and other areas to promote wellbeing and reduce disparities for LGBTQ youth.
This document provides an overview of partnership opportunities between faith-based and neighborhood organizations and the federal government. It begins by introducing the White House Office of Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships and its role in coordinating partnerships across 13 federal agencies. The bulk of the document provides issue-specific sections on various policy areas where partnerships can be formed, such as strengthening adoption, disaster preparedness, education, economic opportunity, and more. Contact information is provided for each agency's Center for Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships.
The document provides an agenda and details for the California Primary Care Association's 2016 Annual Conference. Key points include:
- The conference will celebrate accomplishments of the past year and look towards future opportunities, with the theme "Together Towards Tomorrow."
- New this year is a CPCA beauty bar, non-stop photo studio, polling station for attendees to vote on best exhibitor booths, and a book signing with keynote speaker Dr. Bennet Omalu.
- The agenda includes breakout sessions, keynote presentations, an awards program, and a trade show and reception to network with industry contacts. Registration will utilize new self-check-in iPad stations to streamline the process.
We Care Connection is a nonprofit organization in Watsonville, California that aims to educate the community, assist with employment, and make a positive impact on people's lives. It provides services related to planned parenthood, domestic violence, aging, and education. The organization seeks to reduce Watsonville's historically high unemployment rate and obtain funding through sources like government grants, donations, fundraising events, corporations, and the United Way to support its programs and services. Its budget allocates funds toward salaries, operations, programming, and outcomes evaluation to fulfill its mission of empowering and serving the local community.
The budget summary provides an overview of JWB's revenues and expenditures for the current and next few fiscal years:
- Revenues are derived primarily from property taxes which make up around 90% of total revenues. Intergovernmental transfers also contribute several million dollars annually.
- Expenditures are focused on human services through funding of children and family programs. General government administrative costs are also included.
- The budget is balanced each year by applying fund balance reserves as needed to equal total revenues and expenditures. Maintaining service levels while keeping costs down remains a priority through inflationary cost pressures.
SS Chapter 2 - Governance in Singapore (Lesson 3 of 3)
In this lesson, we moved swiftly through Singapore's ageing population. We talked about what that meant for us in the future (more taxes!!!) and the 'Many Helping Hands' approach to deal with this problem.
Rick Santos, President and CEO, IMA World Health presents on partnerships to ensure full and sustainable global vaccine coverage at the CCIH 2018 conference.
The document discusses eliminating asset tests for eligibility in Medicaid and TANF programs in West Virginia. It argues that asset tests discourage saving and force families to spend down resources to qualify for assistance, hindering self-sufficiency. While states can modify asset tests, West Virginia has some of the strictest limits - $1,000 for Medicaid and $2,000 for TANF. Eliminating asset tests would allow families to save without losing benefits and could reduce program usage and administrative costs over time.
This document provides policy recommendations from the Massachusetts Commission on Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, and Questioning (LGBTQ) Youth for Fiscal Year 2015. It summarizes data showing health disparities experienced by LGBTQ youth such as higher rates of suicide attempts, homelessness, bullying, and substance abuse compared to non-LGBTQ youth. The Commission works with state agencies to develop policies and programs to better support the needs of LGBTQ youth. The recommendations target agencies involved in health and human services, education, housing, employment and other areas to promote wellbeing and reduce disparities for LGBTQ youth.
The document discusses agile metrics and their use. It provides definitions of metrics, key performance indicators, and diagnostics. It discusses reasons to measure and not measure team performance. A case study is presented of a project that implemented agile practices including using Jira and establishing metrics for velocity, story completion, acceptance, and cost per story point. Best practices are recommended like tracking velocity, resource utilization, adherence to criteria, and technical code quality metrics.
Dokumen tersebut membahas tentang keutamaan wanita sholehah dan kewajiban suami istri dalam pernikahan. Beberapa poin penting yang disebutkan antara lain bahwa doa wanita lebih mudah dikabulkan, wanita sholehah lebih baik dari 1000 laki-laki tidak sholeh, dan Allah akan memandang pasangan suami istri dengan kasih sayang jika saling menghormati.
Client focused approach, project management, deep diveAleksandr Fedorov
The document describes the responsibilities of an architect working for Real Model International in Dubai from December 2012 to May 2013. Some of the key responsibilities included:
- Communicating with customers to obtain necessary project information and ensure projects were completed according to requirements.
- Supporting project managers by coordinating sub-projects, developing project schedules and tracking issues.
- Assisting with business development, proposals, and ensuring a customer-centric focus.
- Overseeing the design, procurement, and production of architectural models.
- Providing project finance management and analyzing financial trade-offs with incomplete data.
This document summarizes the services of Cardon Outreach, a revenue cycle management company. They provide a full suite of services including eligibility screening, early out services, accounts receivable management, and disability advocacy. They work to maximize net patient revenue and reduce bad debt for over 800 healthcare clients. Key aspects of their approach include patient-centric screening using tablets, following up extensively with patients, rescreening patient files in real time, and combining payments for ease of resolution. They also work to increase payments through facility enrollment, claims editing, and negotiating quick settlements.
Channel coding transforms binary data bits into signal elements that can be transmitted. It involves selecting a coding scheme to avoid high frequencies, direct current, and ensure timing control. Common line codes include alternate mark inversion (AMI), high-density bipolar three zeros (HDB3), and coded mark inverted (CMI). These codes ensure sufficient transitions to maintain synchronization and embed timing information while removing the dc component.
HW/SW Partitioning Approach on Reconfigurable Multimedia System on ChipCSCJournals
Due to the complexity and the high performance requirement of multimedia applications, the design of embedded systems is the subject of different types of design constraints such as execution time, time to market, energy consumption, etc. Some approaches of joint software/hardware design (Co-design) were proposed in order to help the designer to seek an adequacy between applications and architecture that satisfies the different design constraints. This paper presents a new methodology for hardware/software partitioning on reconfigurable multimedia system on chip, based on dynamic and static steps. The first one uses the dynamic profiling and the second one uses the design trotter tools. The validation of our approach is made through 3D image synthesis.
El documento proporciona recomendaciones para gestionar una marca personal en redes sociales. Recomienda identificar las redes donde se encuentra el público objetivo, usar una imagen y biografía diferenciadora, y compartir contenido relevante que aporte valor. También analiza herramientas como LinkedIn y Twitter para conectar con otros profesionales, estar informado y dar visibilidad al trabajo, y el uso de blogs para posicionarse como experto y aportar valor a la comunidad.
The 2016 annual report of the Summit County Health Department highlights the department's work in promoting and protecting personal and environmental health. It provides an overview of the department's mission and functions, financial information, messages from leadership, and summaries of programs and initiatives in areas such as emergency preparedness, communicable disease control, and health promotion. The report demonstrates the department's impact through interagency collaboration and services that address the health needs and challenges facing Summit County.
2012 - Leicestershire's Family Poverty StrategyDanny Myers
This document presents Leicestershire's Family Poverty Strategy. It summarizes that the child poverty needs assessment concluded that addressing family poverty is key to addressing child poverty. Family poverty is often intergenerational and related to additional complex needs within families. The strategy aims to work holistically with families earlier to provide the right support through a key worker model before issues escalate. This approach has shown improved outcomes for families and cost savings in other areas.
This document summarizes recommendations from a policy report on breaking the cycle of poverty in young families through two-generation strategies. The two-generation approach aims to meet the needs of both parents and children simultaneously by providing services like education, workforce training, childcare and development. The report calls for policy changes at the federal, state and local levels as well as for organizations. Recommended federal policies include redefining poverty levels, increasing minimum wage and funding for existing programs. State/local policies should support blended funding and workforce development. Organizations need help with grants, data collection and collaboration. The overall goal is to provide comprehensive support for young parents and children's economic mobility.
This document summarizes recommendations from a policy report on breaking the cycle of poverty in young families through two-generation strategies. The two-generation approach aims to meet the needs of both parents and children simultaneously by providing services like education, workforce training, childcare and development. The report calls for policy changes at the federal, state and local levels as well as support for organizations implementing two-generation programs. Recommended federal policies include redefining poverty levels, increasing funding for existing programs, and providing tax relief and workforce access for working families. State/local policies should support coordination across services and funding. Organizations need help with evaluation, collaboration and accessing grants. Case studies highlight promising two-generation programs and policies in states like Washington,
Gentry LaRue served as Chairman of the Board of Directors for Community Action Council for over 30 years before stepping down at the end of 2013. Though no longer Chairman, he will continue serving the Council's mission. LaRue was born in 1933 in Kentucky and obtained deferments to complete his education, but was ultimately drafted into the U.S. Army in 1956 after graduating from Kentucky State College. As a long-time leader, LaRue has made significant contributions to reducing poverty in the community.
The document outlines the need to reform Victoria's children and families services system. It notes that while most children grow up safely, the system is failing many vulnerable children. Risk factors like family violence, parental mental health issues, and substance abuse are driving increased reports to child protection. The document calls for a greater focus on early intervention, prevention, and a shared community responsibility in supporting families and keeping children safe. It finds that current services are disconnected, access is difficult, and opportunities are being missed to holistically help at-risk children and families. Reform is needed to build a more integrated, accessible system focused on early support.
This document summarizes a research paper on Bethany Christian Services' Safe Families for Children program. The paper evaluates the program's place in social entrepreneurship, business model, finances, evaluation methods, scaling, and potential for transition. Safe Families for Children is considered a social entrepreneurship as it innovatively addresses family crises through temporary child placements. It operates as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit, relying on grants and donations. The program measures its social impact and financial sustainability. The paper recommends additional evaluation methods and promoting Safe Families for Children and pre-/post-adoption services to reduce foster care costs.
2
8
1
Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Analy
Promoting Safe and Stable Families
The role of nurses throughout healthcare program and policy evaluation is vital to our role as change agents within our communities. As nurses we participate in the evaluation process every time we go to work, assess our patients, and then partake in delivery of care. If we want to our voices to be heard we must be willing to take our evaluation skills to the next level. We must ask ourselves tough questions about whether the healthcare programs we are providing are meeting the needs of patients, their families, and communities. We must evaluate the healthcare program goals and outcomes to help determine whether it remains fiscally responsible and continues to meet a need in the population it aims to serve. Ultimately, we cannot blindly accept that the presence of a program validates its success. We must be willing and able to take personal action to ensure patients receive the highest quality of healthcare each and every day. The purpose of this paper is to present an evaluation of the Promoting Safe and Stable Families (PSSF) program with respect to it’s background, goals, outcomes, success, costs and related nursing advocacy opportunities.
Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation
Promoting Safe and Stable Families (PSSF)
Description
The Promoting Safe and Stable Families (PSSF) program, which is more formally known as Title IV-B subpart 2 of the Social Security Act, aims to avoid unnecessary separations between caregivers and their children, protect permanency for children by taking the necessary steps to reunite them with their parents, when possible, or another permanent living situation, and to improve the quality of care and programming services being offered to children and their families to achieve maximum chance for stable families (U.S. Department of Health & Human Services: Children’s Bureau, 2012).
The PSSF program has recently had two additional programs added, the Personal Responsibility Education Program (PREP) and abstinence education. The goal of the PREP program is to provide state funding aimed at teen pregnancy prevention, addressing prevalence of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in the adolescent population, as well as teaching teens skills to prepare them for adulthood (ie financial responsibility and organization skills). The abstinence education portion provides grants to individual states to promote education to adolescents regarding delaying sexual activity in an effort to further reduce teen pregnancy rates, but also to promote development of healthy relationships and establishment of healthy boundaries in at-risk populations such as homeless teens or those in foster care (United States Department of Health & Human Services, 2018).
How was the success of the program or policy measured?
Success of the PSSF program has been measured by the fact that funding for this program became a ma ...
Program design and management6 social service programsPOLY33
The National Head Start Association (NHSA) is a non-profit organization that provides early childhood education and support services to low-income families through Head Start programs. NHSA serves over 1 million children through 1,600 local programs. Its mission is to support the Head Start model and advocate for policies that help vulnerable children and families succeed. Head Start programs provide education, health care, parent involvement, and social services to young children and their families. NHSA aims to expand access to Head Start and adapt its services to changing community needs.
The document describes the community health programs of UCHealth's Community Health Improvement department. It serves over 75,000 individuals annually in northern Colorado through programs focused on maternal/child health, chronic disease management, injury prevention, health promotion, and more. Key programs discussed include Vida Sana (addressing health equity), Medicaid Accountable Care Collaborative (care coordination), Healthy Harbors (care for at-risk children), family education classes, nurse home visits, Bright by Three (early childhood development), and Healthy Kids Club (active living in youth). The department works with a variety of partners and aims to foster optimal health and wellness through evidence-based community programs.
This document discusses how foundations are increasingly taking a strategic approach to philanthropy by investing in asset building across multiple sectors to create greater impact. It provides examples of how foundations support asset building through initiatives in workforce development like Evergreen Cooperative Initiative in Cleveland, microenterprise/small business programs like ACCION Texas, improving access to education through programs like Financial Aid U, and promoting college completion through programs like CNM Connect. The strategic, cross-sector approach to asset building leverages resources, catalyzes outcomes, and helps families shift from getting by to getting ahead.
The document discusses agile metrics and their use. It provides definitions of metrics, key performance indicators, and diagnostics. It discusses reasons to measure and not measure team performance. A case study is presented of a project that implemented agile practices including using Jira and establishing metrics for velocity, story completion, acceptance, and cost per story point. Best practices are recommended like tracking velocity, resource utilization, adherence to criteria, and technical code quality metrics.
Dokumen tersebut membahas tentang keutamaan wanita sholehah dan kewajiban suami istri dalam pernikahan. Beberapa poin penting yang disebutkan antara lain bahwa doa wanita lebih mudah dikabulkan, wanita sholehah lebih baik dari 1000 laki-laki tidak sholeh, dan Allah akan memandang pasangan suami istri dengan kasih sayang jika saling menghormati.
Client focused approach, project management, deep diveAleksandr Fedorov
The document describes the responsibilities of an architect working for Real Model International in Dubai from December 2012 to May 2013. Some of the key responsibilities included:
- Communicating with customers to obtain necessary project information and ensure projects were completed according to requirements.
- Supporting project managers by coordinating sub-projects, developing project schedules and tracking issues.
- Assisting with business development, proposals, and ensuring a customer-centric focus.
- Overseeing the design, procurement, and production of architectural models.
- Providing project finance management and analyzing financial trade-offs with incomplete data.
This document summarizes the services of Cardon Outreach, a revenue cycle management company. They provide a full suite of services including eligibility screening, early out services, accounts receivable management, and disability advocacy. They work to maximize net patient revenue and reduce bad debt for over 800 healthcare clients. Key aspects of their approach include patient-centric screening using tablets, following up extensively with patients, rescreening patient files in real time, and combining payments for ease of resolution. They also work to increase payments through facility enrollment, claims editing, and negotiating quick settlements.
Channel coding transforms binary data bits into signal elements that can be transmitted. It involves selecting a coding scheme to avoid high frequencies, direct current, and ensure timing control. Common line codes include alternate mark inversion (AMI), high-density bipolar three zeros (HDB3), and coded mark inverted (CMI). These codes ensure sufficient transitions to maintain synchronization and embed timing information while removing the dc component.
HW/SW Partitioning Approach on Reconfigurable Multimedia System on ChipCSCJournals
Due to the complexity and the high performance requirement of multimedia applications, the design of embedded systems is the subject of different types of design constraints such as execution time, time to market, energy consumption, etc. Some approaches of joint software/hardware design (Co-design) were proposed in order to help the designer to seek an adequacy between applications and architecture that satisfies the different design constraints. This paper presents a new methodology for hardware/software partitioning on reconfigurable multimedia system on chip, based on dynamic and static steps. The first one uses the dynamic profiling and the second one uses the design trotter tools. The validation of our approach is made through 3D image synthesis.
El documento proporciona recomendaciones para gestionar una marca personal en redes sociales. Recomienda identificar las redes donde se encuentra el público objetivo, usar una imagen y biografía diferenciadora, y compartir contenido relevante que aporte valor. También analiza herramientas como LinkedIn y Twitter para conectar con otros profesionales, estar informado y dar visibilidad al trabajo, y el uso de blogs para posicionarse como experto y aportar valor a la comunidad.
The 2016 annual report of the Summit County Health Department highlights the department's work in promoting and protecting personal and environmental health. It provides an overview of the department's mission and functions, financial information, messages from leadership, and summaries of programs and initiatives in areas such as emergency preparedness, communicable disease control, and health promotion. The report demonstrates the department's impact through interagency collaboration and services that address the health needs and challenges facing Summit County.
2012 - Leicestershire's Family Poverty StrategyDanny Myers
This document presents Leicestershire's Family Poverty Strategy. It summarizes that the child poverty needs assessment concluded that addressing family poverty is key to addressing child poverty. Family poverty is often intergenerational and related to additional complex needs within families. The strategy aims to work holistically with families earlier to provide the right support through a key worker model before issues escalate. This approach has shown improved outcomes for families and cost savings in other areas.
This document summarizes recommendations from a policy report on breaking the cycle of poverty in young families through two-generation strategies. The two-generation approach aims to meet the needs of both parents and children simultaneously by providing services like education, workforce training, childcare and development. The report calls for policy changes at the federal, state and local levels as well as for organizations. Recommended federal policies include redefining poverty levels, increasing minimum wage and funding for existing programs. State/local policies should support blended funding and workforce development. Organizations need help with grants, data collection and collaboration. The overall goal is to provide comprehensive support for young parents and children's economic mobility.
This document summarizes recommendations from a policy report on breaking the cycle of poverty in young families through two-generation strategies. The two-generation approach aims to meet the needs of both parents and children simultaneously by providing services like education, workforce training, childcare and development. The report calls for policy changes at the federal, state and local levels as well as support for organizations implementing two-generation programs. Recommended federal policies include redefining poverty levels, increasing funding for existing programs, and providing tax relief and workforce access for working families. State/local policies should support coordination across services and funding. Organizations need help with evaluation, collaboration and accessing grants. Case studies highlight promising two-generation programs and policies in states like Washington,
Gentry LaRue served as Chairman of the Board of Directors for Community Action Council for over 30 years before stepping down at the end of 2013. Though no longer Chairman, he will continue serving the Council's mission. LaRue was born in 1933 in Kentucky and obtained deferments to complete his education, but was ultimately drafted into the U.S. Army in 1956 after graduating from Kentucky State College. As a long-time leader, LaRue has made significant contributions to reducing poverty in the community.
The document outlines the need to reform Victoria's children and families services system. It notes that while most children grow up safely, the system is failing many vulnerable children. Risk factors like family violence, parental mental health issues, and substance abuse are driving increased reports to child protection. The document calls for a greater focus on early intervention, prevention, and a shared community responsibility in supporting families and keeping children safe. It finds that current services are disconnected, access is difficult, and opportunities are being missed to holistically help at-risk children and families. Reform is needed to build a more integrated, accessible system focused on early support.
This document summarizes a research paper on Bethany Christian Services' Safe Families for Children program. The paper evaluates the program's place in social entrepreneurship, business model, finances, evaluation methods, scaling, and potential for transition. Safe Families for Children is considered a social entrepreneurship as it innovatively addresses family crises through temporary child placements. It operates as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit, relying on grants and donations. The program measures its social impact and financial sustainability. The paper recommends additional evaluation methods and promoting Safe Families for Children and pre-/post-adoption services to reduce foster care costs.
2
8
1
Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Analy
Promoting Safe and Stable Families
The role of nurses throughout healthcare program and policy evaluation is vital to our role as change agents within our communities. As nurses we participate in the evaluation process every time we go to work, assess our patients, and then partake in delivery of care. If we want to our voices to be heard we must be willing to take our evaluation skills to the next level. We must ask ourselves tough questions about whether the healthcare programs we are providing are meeting the needs of patients, their families, and communities. We must evaluate the healthcare program goals and outcomes to help determine whether it remains fiscally responsible and continues to meet a need in the population it aims to serve. Ultimately, we cannot blindly accept that the presence of a program validates its success. We must be willing and able to take personal action to ensure patients receive the highest quality of healthcare each and every day. The purpose of this paper is to present an evaluation of the Promoting Safe and Stable Families (PSSF) program with respect to it’s background, goals, outcomes, success, costs and related nursing advocacy opportunities.
Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation
Promoting Safe and Stable Families (PSSF)
Description
The Promoting Safe and Stable Families (PSSF) program, which is more formally known as Title IV-B subpart 2 of the Social Security Act, aims to avoid unnecessary separations between caregivers and their children, protect permanency for children by taking the necessary steps to reunite them with their parents, when possible, or another permanent living situation, and to improve the quality of care and programming services being offered to children and their families to achieve maximum chance for stable families (U.S. Department of Health & Human Services: Children’s Bureau, 2012).
The PSSF program has recently had two additional programs added, the Personal Responsibility Education Program (PREP) and abstinence education. The goal of the PREP program is to provide state funding aimed at teen pregnancy prevention, addressing prevalence of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in the adolescent population, as well as teaching teens skills to prepare them for adulthood (ie financial responsibility and organization skills). The abstinence education portion provides grants to individual states to promote education to adolescents regarding delaying sexual activity in an effort to further reduce teen pregnancy rates, but also to promote development of healthy relationships and establishment of healthy boundaries in at-risk populations such as homeless teens or those in foster care (United States Department of Health & Human Services, 2018).
How was the success of the program or policy measured?
Success of the PSSF program has been measured by the fact that funding for this program became a ma ...
Program design and management6 social service programsPOLY33
The National Head Start Association (NHSA) is a non-profit organization that provides early childhood education and support services to low-income families through Head Start programs. NHSA serves over 1 million children through 1,600 local programs. Its mission is to support the Head Start model and advocate for policies that help vulnerable children and families succeed. Head Start programs provide education, health care, parent involvement, and social services to young children and their families. NHSA aims to expand access to Head Start and adapt its services to changing community needs.
The document describes the community health programs of UCHealth's Community Health Improvement department. It serves over 75,000 individuals annually in northern Colorado through programs focused on maternal/child health, chronic disease management, injury prevention, health promotion, and more. Key programs discussed include Vida Sana (addressing health equity), Medicaid Accountable Care Collaborative (care coordination), Healthy Harbors (care for at-risk children), family education classes, nurse home visits, Bright by Three (early childhood development), and Healthy Kids Club (active living in youth). The department works with a variety of partners and aims to foster optimal health and wellness through evidence-based community programs.
This document discusses how foundations are increasingly taking a strategic approach to philanthropy by investing in asset building across multiple sectors to create greater impact. It provides examples of how foundations support asset building through initiatives in workforce development like Evergreen Cooperative Initiative in Cleveland, microenterprise/small business programs like ACCION Texas, improving access to education through programs like Financial Aid U, and promoting college completion through programs like CNM Connect. The strategic, cross-sector approach to asset building leverages resources, catalyzes outcomes, and helps families shift from getting by to getting ahead.
The document provides an introduction and overview for recommendations from the Erie County Community Coordinating Council on Children and Families. The Council was charged with evaluating and improving services for children and families in Erie County. They found that poverty and lack of social support negatively impact families and that the current system of care operates in silos. The report outlines a children's bill of rights and examines how the complexity of the current system impacts those rights. It calls for primary service providers to collaborate more and remove barriers to creating a coordinated, collaborative system of care.
InDesign Product Brochure for Guardian Life Insurancepcorey
This document discusses estate planning considerations for individuals with special needs children. It outlines concerns around guardianship, government assistance programs, care for other family members, estate taxes, and creating a plan to meet the financial needs of the special needs child. It then describes potential sources of financial assistance including family, government programs like Social Security and Medicaid, and charitable organizations. Finally, it discusses three common estate planning strategies - leaving all assets outright to the child, creating a special needs trust, or a combination approach. The goal is to create a secure future for the special needs individual while maintaining eligibility for vital government assistance.
The document provides information on various searchable databases and grant opportunities related to family health and children's health and safety. Section 1 summarizes three searchable databases - Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, Grant Forward, and Grants.gov. Section 2 indicates the document author's areas of interest. Section 3 profiles 10 different foundations and government agencies that offer relevant grants, including the Michael and Susan Dell Foundation, Highmark Foundation, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and American Heart Association. Eligible applicants and example funded projects are described for each funder.
2 0 1 6 S t a t e Fa c t S h e e t sChild Care in America.docxvickeryr87
2 0 1 6 S t a t e Fa c t S h e e t s
Child Care in America:
Every week in the United States, child care providers care for nearly 11
million children younger than age 5 whose parents are working. On
average, these children spend 36 hours a week in child care, and one
quarter (nearly 3 million) are in multiple child care arrangements due to
the traditional and nontraditional working hours of their parents.1
Research has continually illustrated the importance of quality early
experiences in achieving good health, especially within the most
vulnerable populations. Families, child care providers and state and
federal policymakers share responsibility for the safety and wellbeing
of children while they are in child care settings. Basic state
requirements and oversight help lay the foundation necessary to
protect children and promote their healthy development while in child
care.
The Child Care and Development Block Grant (CCDBG) program
serves approximately 1.45 million children annually in communities
across the country. CCDBG is the primary federal grant program that
provides child care assistance for families and funds child care quality
initiatives. Funds are administered to states in formula block grants,
and states use the grants to subsidize child care for low-income
working families.
In November 2014, President Barack Obama signed S.1086, the Child
Care and Development Block Grant Act of 2014 into law. The new law
includes several measures focused on quality, including requiring
states to:
Promote quality child care by increasing activities to improve
the care, enhancing states’ ability to train providers and develop
safer and more effective child care services.
Strengthen health and safety requirements in child care
programs and providers.
Improve access to child care by expanding eligibility for
participating families and helping families connect with quality
programs that meet their needs by enhancing consumer
education, providing greater options for quality child care and
working to ensure continuity of care, essential for both the well-
being and stability of a child.2
With the new federal child care measures set to take effect, states are
rapidly building, evaluating, and changing their early care and
education quality focused systems (Quality Rating and Improvement
System (QRIS), professional development, licensing and standards).
Implementation of the new regulations must align with these efforts for
sustainability and maximum impact.
Over the past several years, Child Care Aware® of America has
surveyed and conducted focus groups with parents of young children,
grandparents, national child advocacy organizations, and state and
local Child Care Resource and Referral (CCR&R) agencies. Those
conversations underscored that child care is an essential building block
1 U.S.
The United Healthcare Silver Compass H.S.A. 3600 plan is classified as a HMO (Health Maintenance Organization) plan. HMO plans require members to use in-network providers for all non-emergency care. Members must select an in-network primary care provider (PCP) who coordinates all care and referrals to specialists. Using out-of-network providers typically results in no coverage, except in emergencies. This plan's network structure and requirement to designate a PCP are characteristics of an HMO plan.
Fostering-Change-Opportunities-in-Transition-Report-SummaryAllison Nelson
This summary provides an overview of a report that analyzes the economic costs and opportunities of investing in supports for youth aging out of foster care in British Columbia.
The report finds that educational, economic, social and wellness outcomes are poor for many youth exiting foster care. It estimates total annual costs of $222-268 million associated with these adverse outcomes. Costs stem from lower educational attainment, poverty, and poor mental health. The report also finds that a basic package of increased supports for housing, education, and social support costing $99,000 per youth could significantly improve outcomes and save tens of millions annually. Improving supports for youth aging out of care could reduce government costs while improving lives.
Examining the role of health facilities in supporting early breastfeeding in ...Stanleylucas
This study examines the relationship between the health service environment related to breastfeeding counseling during antenatal care and early initiation of breastfeeding in Haiti and Malawi. The study uses data from recent Service Provision Assessment surveys in each country, which characterize facility readiness, provider training, and delivery of breastfeeding counseling during antenatal care visits. These data are geographically linked to Demographic and Health Survey data from corresponding areas to analyze associations between the health service environment factors and whether women initiated breastfeeding within one hour of birth, while controlling for individual characteristics. The study aims to identify gaps in health systems support for optimal breastfeeding and provide evidence on how increased provider training could help improve counseling and early breastfeeding.
This document outlines Islington's Children and Families Prevention and Early Intervention Strategy for 2015-2025. The strategy aims to 1) build resilience in children, families, and the community to become more self-sustaining, 2) enable investments to positively impact lives, and 3) continuously evaluate and improve early intervention approaches. The strategy recognizes that early intervention requires a long-term, partnership approach across sectors to support wellness and resilience among Islington's population over 10 years. Intervening early in a child's life and in the onset of problems can generate cost savings and positive outcomes throughout someone's life course.
Retired Military Personnel’s Spouse Welfare ProgramNameInst.docxjoellemurphey
Retired Military Personnel’s Spouse Welfare Program
Name:
Instructor:
Date:
1
Problem/Need
A number of military personnel have spouses who stay at home without formal employment.
The situation is attributed to the long times a military personnel spends in active roles out of the country.
Thus, the wife stays at home to compensate for the time the husband is not close to his children.
Unfortunately, once a military personnel retires, the family source of income is significantly affected negatively.
The situation creates despondency to the veterans who have selflessly opted to sacrifice their life and family life on behalf of the country’s security.
The country has a moral obligation to give back to the families of retired military personnel who have sacrificed their desires to protect the country.
The families of military officers requires a stable life after retirement where they can sustain their needs.
Thus, a program aimed at enabling the spouses of retired military personnel to acquire basic employment skills is essential in promoting their welfare.
A welfare program targeting the spouses of the retired military personnel has been proposed.
2
Objective
The objective of the program is to reinforce welfare of the retired military personnel’s family.
This objective will be attained by developing skills of the retired militaries’ spouses.
The skill development program will aim at enabling the spouses to acquire basic business skills and computer applications.
The skills will help the spouses to earn formal employment or start their own small businesses.
Thus, the income the spouses will earn or generate will reinforce the income of the families.
This will help the retired military officers to live a dignified life after the service.
Methods
In order to instill the skill development effectively to the spouses, effective methods will be employed.
One of the method is to expose the spouses to female spouses outside the military service running their own small scale businesses.
The exposure will give the spouses a basic insight and confidence of running their own business.
The second approach will involve introducing the group to a consultant to learn basic work skills and business plan development.
Similarly, the development program will involve introduction to basic financial management and accounting in running a business.
Furthermore, guideline manuscripts will be supplied to the group for personal learning.
Consequently, the spouses of retired military personnel will be equipped effectively to earn income in reinforcing the family livelihood.
Evaluation
Similar funding targeting the military personnel in the past have shown they are meeting the objectives.
The skill development program targeting the spouses of active military personnel's spouses has seen a significant number of them starting their own businesses and earning employment opportunities.
Similarly, the program funded at offering psychologi ...
2. Table of Contents
Executive Summary .............................................................................................i
I. Vision.............................................................................................................1
II. The Whats and Whys of Family Support ....................................................1
1. The Family Support Planning Process.................................................................. 1
2. The Family Support Blueprint................................................................................ 3
3. What is Family Support? ....................................................................................... 4
4. Why Invest in Family Support? ............................................................................. 5
III. The Picture: Strengths and Needs ..............................................................6
1. Family Economics ................................................................................................. 7
2. Emotional and Behavioral Health.......................................................................... 9
3. Health Access and Physical Health .................................................................... 10
4. Education ............................................................................................................ 11
5. Family and Community Resiliency ...................................................................... 13
IV. Cross Cutting Issues..................................................................................14
1. Changing Demographics.................................................................................... 14
2. Economic Climate............................................................................................... 14
3. Accessible Services............................................................................................ 14
4. Opportunities for Linking and Leveraging Services............................................ 15
5. Building Capacity for Family Support Practice ................................................... 15
V. The Blueprint Framework...........................................................................15
VI. Family Support Strategies for Achieving Our Vision: Overview ............17
VII. Family and Community Members Level Strategies .................................18
♦ Strengthening Individual Skills and Knowledge
♦ Promoting Community Education
VIII. Service Providers and Organizations Level Strategies...........................21
♦ Educating Providers
♦ Fostering Coalitions and Networks
♦ Changing Organizational Practice
IX. Leadership and Policymakers Level Strategies.......................................25
♦ Mobilizing Communities and Neighborhoods
♦ Influencing Policy and Legislation
X. Next Steps ...................................................................................................28
3. Page i
Family Support Blueprint Vision:
Marin is a County in which children
are cherished and families are vital
resources for communities that
thrive. We are united in our efforts to
support all families to be healthy,
secure, interconnected, and filled
with hope and joy. The County's
Family Support System is made up
of formal and informal resources that
are coordinated, accessible and
reflective of our growing diversity.
Everyone in the community shares
the responsibility of contributing to
the wellbeing of families.
I Why Marin Needs a Blueprint for Supporting Families
Marin is a County in which children are cherished and families are vital resources for communities that
thrive.
Across the county, a growing number of families and
communities are struggling to meet their basic needs,
and to provide care and support for their children. At
the same time that families find their needs increasing
in all domains – economics, health and education –
public and non-profits service agencies are faced with
drastic cuts in resources. Meanwhile, Marin’s child
population is growing faster than any Bay Area county.
The Family Support System described in this Blueprint
lays the foundation for a better way of supporting
families, in these tough times and beyond.
This Family Support Blueprint offers a vision of Marin
County that will guide our policies and practice in
support of families for years to come. At this moment
of unprecedented economic crisis, it is even more
critical to have a plan for supporting families in difficult times. The Family Support approach that
underlies this Blueprint is built upon the understanding that family is the most fundamental
influence in the lives and outcomes of children, and families are strong when they are supported by
safe and thriving neighborhoods.
II Purpose of the Blueprint
We are united in our efforts to support all families to be healthy, secure, interconnected, and filled with
hope and joy.
The Family Support Blueprint presents a guiding vision and framework, along with concrete steps
for supporting families in Marin County. It is grounded in both evidence based practices and family
support principles and the needs and strengths that are unique to Marin. It also provides a
framework for organizing new and existing systems and resources in the County. In the current
climate of reduced public, private and philanthropic resources, reorganizing and leveraging what we
have is especially critical. Therefore, in addition to identifying effective family support strategies for
providers, family members, and policymakers, the Blueprint focuses on the pressing issue of
improving the coordination and overall effectiveness of the Family Support System.
The Blueprint was developed with input from a countywide cross-section of service providers,
public agencies, advocates, policymakers and community members. It has been endorsed by all of
the stakeholder organizations represented on the Steering Committee, and, as such, carries
significant political capital. The Blueprint provides a common language, vision and framework for
everyone working with families in Marin. It can be used to inform individual services, to advocate
for new and existing resources, and to integrate the many efforts happening across the county.
III Why Invest in Family Support
Even prior to the recent economic downturn, a wide range of social and demographic factors
changed the landscape for many Marin families. Demographic shifts such as an increase in the
4. Page ii
number of single-parent households, growing poverty, and Marin’s extraordinary cost of living have
increased the number of families that struggle to meet their basic needs. A growing immigrant
population has required a shift in service delivery systems to meet the challenges of greater diversity.
Furthermore, the burgeoning cost of healthcare and housing, long commute and work hours, and
the breakdown of extended family and neighborhood support have increased burdens on families.
As the nation faces an unprecedented healthcare crisis, research tells us that the social conditions of
our lives (e.g. employment, housing and education) impact health more than genetics, behavior, or
even medical care. Chronic stress, experienced by those who have high demands but little control in
their lives, taxes physiological systems and often triggers an array of chronic diseases.1
Research
consistently shows that investing in children yields substantial benefits and savings to society.2
Now, more than ever, we need to invest in families. According to First Focus, a bi-partisan child
advocacy group, an additional 2.6-3.3 million children throughout the nation are likely to fall into
poverty during this recession. Of these children, 60% could fall into persistent or intermittent
poverty - often leading to lost earnings, increased crime, and poor health outcomes. Ultimately the
cost of this increase in child poverty could total $1.7 trillion over this generation’s lifetime.3
Local communities and the federal government can do something to divert our children from this
path. From the 1960’s to the early 70’s, the federal government instituted a number of anti-poverty
programs that reduced the child poverty rate to an all-time low in 1973. The health and educational
status of children during this period demonstrated a corresponding improvement. Family Support
has the potential to improve the lives of families across all of these domains. Engaging families in
problem solving and bringing together services and resources that promote new opportunities will
increase the capacity of families to be healthy, involved members of dynamic communities. Now,
more than ever, is the time for Marin to give top priority to the wellbeing of children and families.
IV Components of the Family Support Blueprint
The Family Support Blueprint for Marin County contains all of
the elements necessary to build a comprehensive Family
Support System. It starts with a foundation of Strengths and
Needs and Cross Cutting Issues for families. It then presents an
organizational Framework drawn from the Spectrum of
Prevention4
, which is used nationally to develop comprehensive
prevention strategies. Finally, it lays out in detail Strategies at all
levels of the spectrum, highlighting “high leverage
opportunities” and effective strategies for coordination.
Strengths and Needs. An effective Family Support System is
rooted in an understanding of the unique strengths and needs of
the community. The first step in creating a countywide Blueprint for family support was to examine
the status of families. We gathered data from many sources across the domains of family life: Family
Economics, Health Access and Physical Health, Emotional and Behavioral Health, Education, and
1 Ten Things to Know About Health, California Newsreel (2008)
2 Investing in Infants and Toddlers: The Economics of Early Childhood, Zero to Three Policy Center
3
http://www.firstfocus.net/Download/CostNothing.pdf
4 http://cchealth.org/topics/prevention/spectrum.php
5. Page iii
Family/Community Resilience. The Blueprint presents the key findings, and the complete
Community Assessment can be found at: http://www.co.marin.ca.us/familysupport.
Cross Cutting Issues. The key findings from the Assessment led to the identification of five
cross cutting issues most heavily affecting families in all aspects of their lives. These issues help us
understand, develop and communicate about the work of supporting families.
1. Changing Demographics: Marin’s child population is growing faster than any Bay Area county,
and becoming increasingly ethnically diverse. The family support system must expand to serve a
growing population, and do so in a manner that is culturally and linguistically appropriate.
2. Economic Climate: Even before the economic downturn, one-third of Marin households were
unable to pay basic living expenses and were not considered self-sufficient. It takes more than
four full-time minimum wage jobs to cover the basic expenses for a family of three in Marin.
Meanwhile, the cost of housing is extraordinary, unemployment is rising, and demand for public
assistance and services is growing at the same time those resources are diminishing.
3. Accessible Services: In addition to barriers such as lack of transportation and language, another
challenge to access is the federally-defined requirements for many services. For example, the
Federal Poverty Level is so low that, while many families have incomes above what qualifies for
subsidized services, they struggle to meet basic needs because the cost of living is so high.
4. Linking and Leveraging Services: Marin supports families through a wide range of services.
However, navigating the many CBOs, school districts and public agencies in this geographically
diverse county is a challenge for providers and families alike. It is crucial to develop an effective
resource and referral system, and to move beyond that to a coordinated system of care,
especially in difficult financial times.
5. Building Capacity for Family Support Practice: While providers agree that the family support
principles describe their philosophy, integrating the principles into their work is challenging. The
system must integrate promising and evidence-based practices while at the same time engaging
our diverse informal resources, families, and unique communities that make up this County.
V The Framework and Strategies
The County's family support system is made up of formal and informal resources that are coordinated,
accessible and reflective of our growing diversity.
This section of the Blueprint details what is needed to achieve our vision of a countywide Family
Support System. The Blueprint consolidates the Spectrum of Prevention into three stakeholder
levels that are most directly affected by the strategies, that is, family and community members,
service providers and organizations, and leadership and policymakers. The system should facilitate
the flow of information, feedback and learning among all three stakeholder levels.
The strategies in the Blueprint are a combination of existing strategies currently underway in the
County and promising new ideas that have shown success in other communities. While the majority
of these strategies are currently in place, many successful ones must be expanded, adapted to other
communities, and/or better coordinated to meet the expressed need of families and providers. In
addition, many strategies were in danger of being cut as the Blueprint went to print.
Within each stakeholder level, there are 2-3 high leverage opportunities. These involve strategies that are
connected to a specific opportunity in the coming year, e.g. stimulus funding, organizational priority.
6. Page iv
The following are six high leverage opportunities that directly address our changing demographics,
economic climate, access to services, linking and leveraging opportunities, and capacity building.
♦ Supportive Services for Pregnant and Postpartum Families. Leveraging and expanding
resources targeting postpartum depression could substantially increase home-visiting and group
prenatal care, both of which increase access to evidence-based services. Possible new resources
include Early Head Start stimulus funds, Bella Vista Foundation funding, and the County
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).
♦ Resource and Referral. At the same time that the current economic crisis has created a
demand for services which is unprecedented, both direct services and the outreach necessary to
provide access to those services are being cut. The County HHS will dedicate staff time to work
with 211, Network of Care for Kids, www.HealthyMarin.org, and other coordination points for
family support services to improve access to and use of HHS and community resources.
♦ School-Based Services. There is significant federal, regional and foundation support for
school-based services under the umbrella of Community Schools, an approach with which Marin
has had considerable experience through School-Linked Services (SLS). Although current fiscal
challenges will result in the end of SLS as we know it, the infrastructure and relationships that
have been built position Marin to access funding for Community Schools, an effective way to
support children, families and community, and to address the crosscutting issues.
♦ Division of Public Health / HHS Restructuring. The Marin County Division of Public
Health (DPH) is currently undergoing a reorganization process. The DPH will utilize the Family
Support Blueprint to help inform decisions related how existing public health resources will
support families in Marin and to leverage resources for a range of family support strategies. This
will help address families’ increased needs and improve linkages, even during difficult times.
♦ Coordination at the Level of Service Providers and Organizations. The release of this
Blueprint could generate increased involvement and philanthropic support for coordination of
family support efforts. We recommend exploring how to build on existing coordination points
for service providers, such as the Coordinating Council, to most effectively link a wide range of
family support providers, and leverage our efforts, knowledge and resources.
♦ Coordination at the Level of Leadership and Policymakers. The Family Support Steering
Committee is an existing group of leaders in the field that has the potential to build and sustain a
coordinated approach and the political will for family support across Marin County.
VI Moving Forward
Everyone in the community shares the responsibility of contributing to the wellbeing of families.
This Family Support Blueprint offers a vision of Marin County that will guide our policies and
practice in support of families for years to come. At this moment of unprecedented economic crisis,
it is critical that we have a plan for supporting families in difficult times. The Family Support
Steering Committee will continue to focus our collective efforts to achieve the vision and strategies
defined in the Blueprint and build political will to improve the wellbeing of all families.
7. Page 1
I Vision
Marin is a County in which children are cherished and families are vital
resources for communities that thrive. We are united in our efforts to
support all families to be healthy, secure, interconnected, and filled with
hope and joy. The County's family support system is made up of formal
and informal resources that are coordinated, accessible and reflective of
our growing diversity. Everyone in the community shares the
responsibility of contributing to the wellbeing of families.
II The Whats and Whys of Family Support
1. The Family Support Planning Process
In mid-2007, the Marin County Division of Public Health, Community Health and Prevention
Services (CHPS) met with staff from the Bella Vista Foundation, a small family foundation that
supports early childhood projects, to discuss the feasibility of convening a countywide family
support planning process. CHPS received funding from the Bella Vista Foundation to conduct such
a planning process, focusing on families with children from pregnancy to age five. The Marin
Community Foundation, through their School Linked Services initiative, provided additional
funding to expand the project focus to families with school-aged youth.
The family support planning process consisted of two components - a community assessment,
which then informed the development of this countywide Family Support Blueprint. CHPS engaged
a consulting company, Hatchuel Tabernik & Associates, to assist with the planning process and
convened a Steering Committee of diverse group of leaders providing support to families in Marin.
The Community Assessment was designed to paint a picture of life for families in Marin - their
needs, strengths, informal resources and formal services. This assessment covers the full scope of
family life and is somewhat unique in that it provides information in domains including economics,
education; health and mental health among others. While even the best community assessment
provides only a snapshot in time, the picture in Marin began to change significantly with the
economic downturn that started part way through the process. The community assessment was
conducted from the spring of 2008 to early 2009, and, in the process, has made best efforts to
document the status of families in Marin during this period of change. The assessment utilized
extant community level data and focus groups as follows:
• Marin County Community Health Survey (2001), which, though dated, provides the best
sample size of any community survey in Marin.
• The California Health Information Survey, with 2005 data being most frequently cited
because of a larger sample size. The assessment also references 2003 CHIS data when survey
questions were not available in subsequent years and pooled 2005/2007 data when it would
be a more accurate reflection of the community.
• California Healthy Kids Survey (2004-06)
8. Page 2
• A variety of state-level databases, such as the California Department of Finance, California
Department of Education, as well as from a number of local assessments including Pathways
to Progress, the Marin County Childcare Master Plan, and the Maternal, Child, and
Adolescent Health Capacity Assessment.
• Seven focus groups with families from pregnancy to five years of age included:
◦ Marin Head Start Policy Council
◦ Marin City School Readiness Initiative Playgroup
◦ Community Action Marin Family Council
◦ San Geronimo Valley School Readiness Initiative Playgroup
◦ Family Service Agency Postpartum Depression Group
◦ Centering Pregnancy Group
◦ Aprendiendo Juntos Playgroup
• Four focus groups with parents of school-aged children at the following locations:
◦ Shoreline School Linked Services parent participants
◦ Lynwood Family Literacy Program
◦ Novato Youth Center, Parent Project participants
◦ Venetia Valley School English Learner Advisory Committee
• An on-line survey was developed and sent to providers of family support services and
community leaders that were identified by Steering Committee members. Ninety-two
providers responded to the survey.
The Steering Committee met on a bi-monthly basis for a year and a half to guide the process. The
Family Support Steering Committee members include:
♦ Jenna Churchman Prosperity Partners / Community Action Marin
♦ Mary Donovan Division of Social Services
♦ Ericka Erikson Grassroots Leadership Network
♦ Linda Frost and Alaina Cantor Novato Youth Center
♦ Kristen Gardner MHSA Prevention and Early Intervention Consultant
♦ Bonne Goltz-Reiser Jewish Children and Family Services
♦ Paula Machado San Rafael City Schools
♦ Alma Martinez Novato Unified School District
♦ Sheryl Morgan and Kay Wernert Marin Head Start
♦ Jenny Ocon Parent Services Project
♦ Ann Pring Community Mental Health
♦ Sandy Ponek Canal Alliance
♦ Amy Reisch First 5 Marin
♦ Lisa Schwartz Marin County Office of Education
♦ Lisa Sepahi and Bobbe Rockoff Department of Health and Human Services
♦ Rebecca Smith Division of Public Health, CHPS
♦ Sparkie Spaeth Division of Public Health, CHPS
♦ Dani Tarry Marin Community Foundation , School Linked Services
♦ Kathy Truax Family Service Agency
♦ Terri Vyenielo Rockas Kaiser Permanente / Healthy Marin Partnership
♦ Tina Warren Division of Public Health, CHPS
♦ Donna West Division of Public Health, CHPS
Steering Committee members contributed to the overall design of the planning process, the
assessment tools and target audiences, and the vision and structure of the Blueprint. They reviewed
the findings and discussed the implications of those findings on family support strategies. They
9. Page 3
shared current opportunities and threats to family support, and identified existing family support
practices in Marin and promising practices from around the country. Two ad hoc workgroups
emerged during the process - Data and What Works - that conducted research and analysis and
reported back to the full Committee. The work culminated in a full-day retreat and two follow-up
meetings, to develop the strategies and next steps presented in this Blueprint.
2. The Family Support Blueprint
The Marin County Family Support Blueprint presents a guiding vision and framework, along with
concrete steps for supporting families in Marin County. The Blueprint is grounded in family support
principles and the needs and strengths identified through the community assessment. We envision
that the Blueprint will serve as a guide for organizing new and existing systems and resources in the
County. It is designed to be accessible and usable by all sectors of the County in a number of
capacities including but not limited to: coordinating resources, developing programs, making policy,
mobilizing communities, and directing funding.
The Blueprint draws upon the Spectrum of Prevention as an organizing framework. The Spectrum
of Prevention (described in detail on pages 15-16) outlines seven levels of intervention – from
strengthening individual skills to influencing policy – that together guide the development of a
comprehensive community approach to addressing complex issues.
The Steering Committee chose the Spectrum as a framework because it captures the complexity of
family support. Not only does it encourage people to think about strategies at the micro and macro
levels, it also enables us to think across the traditional silos in which family support providers and
advocates usually operate (e.g. education, health or family economics) to develop a blueprint for
supporting families holistically. The Family Support Blueprint starts by presenting The Picture of
strengths and needs in the county in the traditional service domains. However, it then intentionally
moves to identifying short and long-term strategies across all of those domains, organized by level
of support on the Spectrum. The seven levels have been further consolidated into three stakeholder
levels, or the type of stakeholder that is most directly impacted by the strategies: (1) family and
community members, (2) service providers and organizations, and (3) leadership and policymakers.
We hope that the vision of a family support system presented here will be an enduring one. The
current economic climate makes the emphasis on a coordinated and accessible system even more
critical. Therefore the Blueprint includes many strategies that increase collaboration, in addition to
explicit coordination strategies that focus on improving the overall effectiveness of the family
support system at all levels of the Spectrum.
Uses of Blueprint. As mentioned, the Blueprint is a guide for building a countywide system of
family support. In an effort to make the Blueprint user-friendly and relevant, there are two major
points of entry: the picture and the strategies.
If stakeholders are interested in the strengths and needs of families, they can be explored in The
Picture section of the Blueprint, which is organized by specific domain, i.e. family economics,
physical health and health access, mental health, education, and family/community resiliency.
If stakeholders are looking for guidance for developing programs, building capacity and linkages,
or policymaking, then they can open up The Strategies section and start with the most relevant
stakeholder level.
10. Page 4
Family Support Principles
1. Families are resources to their own members, to
other families, to programs, and to communities.
2. Staff enhance families’ capacity to support the
growth and development of all family members
and emphasize the importance of hope and joy.
3. Practitioners work with families to mobilize both
formal and informal resources.
4. Programs affirm and strengthen families’ cultural,
racial, and linguistic identities and enhance their
ability to function in a multicultural society.
5. Programs advocate with families for services and
systems that are coordinated, fair, responsive, and
accountable to the families served.
6. Staff and families work together in relationships
based on equality and respect.
7. Programs are flexible and responsive to emerging
family and community issues.
8. Programs are embedded in communities,
interdependent, and contribute to the community-
building process.
9. Principles of family support are modeled in all
program activities, including planning,
governance, and administration.
Since the Blueprint was developed with input from a broad cross-section of the County and has
been adopted by all of the stakeholders represented on the Steering Committee, it presents
significant political capital for individual organizations as they advocate for new or existing family
support services and resources. The Blueprint provides a common language, vision and framework
for everyone working with families in Marin. It can be used to inform individual services and to
integrate the many efforts underway across the county. Steering Committee members identified
some of the ways that they, and all family support providers and stakeholders, can use the Blueprint:
• Inform City and County planning and resource allocation
• Utilize as a tool for organizational development
• Inform program planning
• Inform strategic planning at all levels, e.g. County level, interdepartmental, community-based
organizations, foundations
• Build policy platforms
• Create legislation
• Leverage funding
• Identify gaps and areas of need, both geographically and by service area
• Guide orientation and training
• Utilize as a tool for organizing parents
• Track countywide progress towards supporting families with a cohesive system
3. What is Family Support?
A growing number of families and communities are struggling to provide care and support for their
children. Even prior to the recent economic downturn, a wide range of social and demographic
factors has changed the landscape for many
families in Marin. Changing demographics, such as
an increase in the number of single-parent
households and growing poverty, have lead to a
greater number of families that struggle to meet
their basic needs. A growing immigrant population
has required a shift in service delivery systems to
meet the needs of this more diverse population.
Furthermore, the increasing cost of healthcare, long
commute and work hours, and the breakdown of
extended family and neighborhood support has
created additional burdens on families.
Family support is an approach to working with
families that considers these changing needs. This
approach is built upon the understanding that
family is the most fundamental factor
influencing the lives and outcomes of children,
and families are strong when they are
supported by safe and thriving neighborhoods.5
Family support brings together services and
resources that promote new opportunities for
families, which, in turn, increase the capacity of
5 Family Strengthening Policy Center, Policy Brief. Introduction to Family Strengthening, 2004
11. Page 5
families to be healthy, involved members of dynamic communities. Engaging families in problem-
solving, while at the same time developing skills, creates both healthy and functioning families and
stronger communities.
The approach of family support encompasses philosophy, programs, and place. Family support is based
upon a philosophy or principles that guide interactions with families. These principles focus on
resiliency and are strengths-based (see Family Support Principles above). Family Support includes
programs or resources that promote healthy family functioning and minimize adverse childhood
experiences. These programs and philosophy are ideally embedded in a place – neighborhood-based
supports that are multidisciplinary and integrated.
4. Why Invest in Family Support?
As the nation faces an unprecedented crisis in healthcare, research indicates that the social
conditions of our lives (e.g. employment, housing and educational levels) impact our health as much
as our genes, our individual behavior, or even our medical care. Here in the United States, the
strongest predictor of an individual’s health is his or her class status; poorer people are four times
more likely to die an early death than those in the upper income brackets. Chronic stress,
experienced by those who have high demands but little control in their lives, taxes physiological
systems to the point of creating an array of chronic diseases.6
Healthy People 2010, which creates
federal goals and benchmarks for health, recognizes that, “Communities, states, and national
organizations will need to take a multidisciplinary approach to achieving health equity — an
approach that involves improving health, education, housing, labor, justice, transportation,
agriculture, and the environment.” Family support is just such a multi-disciplinary approach to
addressing these social determinants of health.
A growing body of research indicates that early relationships, particularly during the first three years
of life, influence long term health, mental health, social and academic outcomes for children.
Researchers in the field of human capital, such as Nobel Prize winner James Heckman, have
consistently found that investing in these early years of life produces high benefits and savings to
society.7
Cost-benefit analyses of quality early care programs show a return on investment of 16
percent each year, a rate exceptionally higher than returns to most stock market investments or
traditional economic development.8
This notion of a high return on investments for children is supported by research on long-term
health consequences for children who have adverse childhood experiences. In the late 1990’s Kaiser
Permanente Department of Preventative Medicine in San Diego and the Center for Disease Control
surveyed 17,337 middle-income, educated patients about adverse childhood experiences (ACEs),
such as exposure to abuse, drug or alcohol abuse in the household, having a depressed or mentally
ill parent, having an absent parent, etc. Researchers found that, as the number of ACEs these
individuals were exposed to increased, so did the variety and severity of chronic diseases and social
problems that they experienced as adults. The ACE Study found that adults who had adverse
experiences as children had higher rates of smoking, pulmonary disease, hepatitis, heart disease,
fractures, diabetes, obesity, alcohol abuse, and IV drug use.
6 Ten Things to Know About Health, California Newsreel (2008)
7 Investing in Infants and Toddlers: The Economics of Early Childhood, Zero to Three Policy Center
8 www.childrensdefense.org/helping-americas-children/early-childhood-education-child-care/about.html
12. Page 6
Individuals with multiple
ACEs were 460% more
likely to suffer from
depression as adults and
have an attempted suicide
rate that is 30-51 times
higher than average.9
The
ACE pyramid demon-
strates that adverse child-
hood experiences lead to
disrupted neurodevelop-
ment which leads to risky
behaviors, and ultimately
disease, disability and early
death.
Now, more than ever, we
need to invest in children
and families. According to
First Focus, a bi-partisan
child advocacy group, an
additional 2.6 - 3.3 million children in the nation are likely to fall into poverty during this recession.
Of these children, 60% could fall into persistent or intermittent poverty - often leading to future lost
earnings, increased crime, and poor health outcomes. Ultimately the cost of this increase in child
poverty could total $1.7 trillion over this generation’s lifetime.
Finally, in addressing our urgent economic challenges, policymakers and economists agree that
improving the economic stability and earnings of low-income families is a good way to stimulate the
economy, as they are likely to spend additional resources quickly in order to meet their basic needs
that will in turn enable them to contribute to an upturn in the economy.10
III The Picture: Strengths and Needs
An effective family support system must be rooted in the unique needs
and strengths of the community. Therefore, the first step in creating a
countywide Blueprint for family support was to examine the status of
families. Over the course of 10 months, we gathered quantitative and
qualitative data to help develop a picture of how families were faring –
their needs, strengths, informal resources and formal services. We looked
at extant data from many sources across the core domains of family life:
Family Economics, Health Access and Physical Health, Emotional and
Behavioral Health, Education, and Family/Community Resilience. We
also held focus groups with families, and surveyed 92 providers. The key
9 http://www.acestudy.org/files/Gold_into_Lead-_Germany1-02_c_Graphs.pdf
10 www.childrensleadershipcouncil.com/node/7
Figure 1. Adverse Childhood Experiences Pyramid
13. Page 7
findings for each domain are presented below. The full Community Assessment, with greater detail
and complete citations, can be found at http://www.co.marin.ca.us/familysupport.
Families in Marin face a wide range of social, economic, and public health challenges that threaten
their ability to thrive in our community. Although Marin has fewer households with children than
the state average, the child population is rising. Furthermore the number of Latino children in Marin
has doubled in the past eight years. Findings from the Community Assessment reveal significant
need among Marin’s low-income population; however, all families have needs. Many Marin families
are experiencing a period of unprecedented need, which intensified with the recent economic
downturn.
Figure 2. Changes in Ethnicity of Marin Youth Population
Percent of Youth (0-17 Years Old) by Ethnicity
73%
57%
15%
32%
12% 11%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
2000 2008
Other
Latino
White
Figure 3. Change in Age of Marin Youth Population
Age/Population 1995 2000 2008
Change
1995-2008
0-2 years 8,186 8,045 7,467 -9%
3-5 years 9,019 8,169 9,585 6%
6-10 years 13,948 14,664 15,926 14%
11-13 years 7,450 8,682 8,792 18%
14-17 years 8,012 10,978 11,827 48%
Total 0-17 years 46,615 50,538 53,597 15%
1. Family Economics $
• For a county widely considered as being wealthy, Marin has consistently had a siginifcant
number of poor children. Officially, 3,767 or 7.7% of children aged 0 to 17 lived in
households reporting incomes below the federal poverty level (FPL) in 2005; 17.7% of
children were living in households below 200% of the FPL. Most of these children live in
Novato and San Rafael. (US Census Bureau)
• Marin’s unemployment rate has increased significantly -- from 3.9% on average during 2005
to 7.4% in March 2009; however, Marin’s unemployment rate is significantly below the
statewide unemployment rate of 11.5%. (Calfornia Employment Development Department)
14. Page 8
• Marin families are experiencing significant financial hardships, unlike those seen since the
Great Depression. Based on two locally-developed aggregate community need indices,
demand for public assistance rose over 20% between January and December 2008. Families
in focus groups overwhelmingly identified financial concerns as the top stressor impacting
their family. In particular, families who did not qualify for public assistance expressed
significant frustration about obtaining resources to help them make ends meet. (Marin
County Department of Health and Human Services)
• Even before the economic downturn, more than one-third of Marin’s households (35,387
out of 100,201) were not able to able to pay for basic living expenses and were not
considered to be self sufficient according to the County’s Department of Health and Human
Services. The self-sufficiency index is a measure of county-specific costs for housing, food,
transportation, child care, health care, and taxes. A single adult with a preschooler and a
school-age child will require $68,880 per year to remain self-sufficient in Marin County in
2008, requiring more than the equivalent of 4 full-time minimum wage jobs. (Insight Center for
Community Economic Development)
Figure 4. Self-Sufficiency and Earnings in Marin
• Many families who were not officially classified as “living in poverty” could not sustain the
cost of living in Marin. While only 5.7% of people in Marin County meet the federal poverty
requirements, 18.2% live in a state of asset poverty – defined as not having enough assets in
reserve to financially support them for a 3 month period. (Marin County Department of
Health and Human Services)
• Marin’s homeless population is growing, while the County is struggling to meet the
increasing need. In February 2009, 1,770 people were identified as homeless and either living
in shelters or locations not meant for human habitation; of these, 331 were children. An
additional 3,028 were precariously housed, i.e. were “doubling or tripling up” with friends or
family members. (Marin County Department of Health and Human Services)
15. Page 9
• In 2008, fair market rent for a 2 bedroom unit was $1,592 / month as opposed to $905 in
California. Furthermore, there is a deficit of subsidized housing in the County, with only
half of those living below 100% of the Federal Poverty Level in Marin having access to very
low-income housing.
• Food security is an important issue for low-income families in Marin. While participation in
the food stamp program has increased, state studies show that many eligible families in
Marin are not accessing the food stamp program. (California Food Policy Advocates)
• Participation in the school Free and Reduced Lunch program increased from 14.4% in 2003
to 24% in 2008. The districts with the highest participation rates were Sausalito Marin City,
San Rafael and Shoreline. (CA Department of Education)
Figure 5. Youth Participating in Free or Reduced School Lunch Program
Percent of Youth Receiving Free or Reduced Lunch
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Sausalito-Marin City San Rafael Shoreline Marin County
2. Emotional and Behavioral Health ☺
• Approximately one
quarter of mothers
reported that they were so
sad or downhearted after
having a child that they
needed some kind of help,
and of that group only
37% got help. This
percentage was higher for
low-income mothers
(below 300% of Federal
Poverty Line) and first-
time mothers. Almost one
half of low-income
mothers felt they needed
Figure 6. Woman in Marin who Reported Feeling Sad after
Childbirth, by Income
Percent of Women who Feel Sad After
Childbirth
14% 16%
22%
24%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
Moderate and High Income
Moms
Low Income Moms
Received Needed Help Did NOT Receive Needed Help
16. Page 10
emotional help after giving birth. (Marin County Health Survey)
• Mothers in Marin are twice as likely to receive help for mental health or emotional problems
as are fathers. (California Health Information Survey)
• While Marin youth report lower levels of sadness and hopelessness than their statewide
counterparts, low-income youth report nearly three times the risk of depression as do more
affluent youth. (California Healthy Kids Survey)
• Although Marin’s rates of reports and substantiated cases of child abuse and neglect are less
than the statewide rate, both reports and substantiated cases disproportionately involve
children of color. (University of California at Berkeley Center for Social Services Research)
• Reports of domestic violence are increasing in San Rafael and the unincorporated areas of
Marin while it has decreased across California. Exposure to domestic violence can lead to
the same emotional, behavioral, and academic problems faced by children who are direct
victims of abuse. Data from the Family Violence Prevention Project in 2002 indicates that in
at least 29% of domestic violence cases, children are present at the time of the incident.
(Calfornia Department of Justice, Criminsal Justice Statistics Center)
3. Health Access and Physical Health
• Marin children generally have high rates of primary health coverage (98%) and access to a
medical home. Dental insurance coverage and oral health utilization rates for children in
Marin, however, are worse than for children statewide. (CA Health Information Survey)
• Overall, Marin parents (90%) reported that they had health insurance, which compares
favorably with the state. However, only 67% of low-income parents reported that they had
health insurance. According to the family support survey of social service providers in
Marin, healthcare for adults was rated as one of the most needed but least available services.
In focus groups throughout the County, parents spoke frequently about obstacles to
healthcare including inaccessible hours, challenging voice mail systems, front office staff
being disrespectful, difficulty with paperwork, wait times, and long wait lists. (California
Health Information Survey)
• Forty percent of low-income
parents report that they do
not have mental health
coverage, which compares
poorly with the state.
According to a survey of
social service providers in
Marin County, mental health
services for adults ranks
highly in a list of most needed
but least available services in
Marin. (California Health
Information Survey)
• Trust and familiarity are the
most essential qualities that
Figure 7. Mental Health Coverage Among Parents, by Income
Percent of Parents with no Mental
Health Insurance
27%
40%
22%
30%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
All Marin Parents Low-income Marin
Parents
Marin California
17. Page 11
predict who Latino parents will rely upon for healthcare information. (First 5 Marin, Health
Access Health Literacy Initiative)
• Pregnant women in Marin effectively utilize prenatal care, but many lose care shortly after
birth. Nearly one quarter of all births in Marin are paid for by Medi-Cal, and most of these
are to undocumented Latina immigrants. Mothers who have Emergency Medi-Cal for
pregnancy lose coverage within 4-8 weeks, leaving them uninsured at a particularly
vulnerable time. (California Center for Health Statistics)
• Marin families have high rates of breastfeeding initiation, but most mothers do not continue
to breastfeed for the recommended duration and rates fall below the Healthy People 2010
objective. (California Department of Public Health, Center for Family Health, Genetic
Disease Screening Program and California Health Information Survey)
• Marin’s rate of overweight children is lower than Bay Area and statewide averages, but is
increasing. There are ethnic disparities in rates of physical fitness among youth, with Latino
and African-American youth being generally less fit. (Center for Disease Control and
Prevention, The Pediatric Nutrition Surveillance System, CA Health Information Survey)
Figure 8. Seventh Graders Meeting the Physical Fitness Standards
Percent of Youth (7th Grade) who meet
Phyiscal Fitness Standards
55%
51% 50%
33%
28%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Asian American White Filipino Hispanic /
Latino
African
American
4. Education
• Marin County has shortages of infant and school-age care. While sufficient care exists to
serve preschool-aged children generally, many working families are unable to find full time
care for their children. (Marin County Child Care Commission)
• In many cases, families with children of all ages are unable to afford the full price of child
care and are unable to obtain subsidized care for their children. There are an estimated 2.2
children eligible for subsidized care competing for each available subsidized space in the
county. Parents in focus groups identified lack of affordable childcare and afterschool
activities as a primary stressor for their family. (Marin County Child Care Commission)
• Public school enrollment has historically remained relatively steady, but enrollment increased
over the last four years. The California Department of Education projects that Marin’s
enrollment will continue to rise and have one of the fastest increasing enrollments over the
next decade as compared to other counties.
18. Page 12
• Marin’s Latino and English Language Learner (ELL) populations have grown significantly;
the Latino population has increased by 20% and the ELL by 36% over the last 8 years.
(California Department of Education)
Figure 9. Enrollment in Marin County Schools, 2007-2008
Enrollment White Latino
African
American
Other
(including Asian)
English
Learners
Economically
Disadvantaged
29,081 64% 19.8% 3.4% 12.8% 13% 20.9%
• Marin has a significant achievement gap. African American and Latino children score much
lower than their White and Asian counterparts on several standardized state test measures.
Furthermore, in many cases, the gap in test scores between Marin’s children of color and
their white counterparts is larger than in other Bay Area counties and the state overall. (CA
Department of Education)
Figure 10. Achievement Gap Among Students on the CAT/6 Standardized Test, 2007
CAT/6: Percent of Youth Scoring in the 50th Percentile or Above
62%
21%
75% 75%
71%
26%
31%
47%
22%
54% 56%
61%
22%
17%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Overall Economically
Disadvantaged
Non-
Economically
Disadvantaged
White Asian Latino African
American
3rd Grade Reading Algebra I
Figure 11. Achievement Gap Among 10
th
graders on the California High School Exit Exam, 2007
High School Exit Exam: Percent of 10th Graders Passing
88%
95%
60%
96% 94%
62%
74%
88%
94%
63%
95% 97%
67%
62%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Overall Non-
Economically
Disadvantaged
Economically
Disadvantaged
White Asian Latino African
American
English Math
19. Page 13
• Parents in focus groups expressed a desire for more information about child development,
particularly related to how to discipline children. Parents of young children overwhelmingly
expressed an interest in drop-in parenting groups, informal educational opportunities, and
free parent-child activities such as those that are available through First 5 Marin's School
Readiness Initiative playgroups. (Family Support Focus Groups)
• Parents of school-aged children expressed a desire for support with navigating the public
school system and dealing with acculturation issues for Latino immigrant families. Parents
also expressed a need for more affordable afterschool care and activities for school-aged
children and youth. (Family Support Focus Groups)
5. Family and Community Resiliency ♥
• Marin parents report higher levels of involvement with young children than statewide
counterparts, but seem to have lower levels of teen supervision than parents statewide. Many
parents in focus groups expressed challenges balancing work and family life. (Marin Family
Support Focus Groups)
• In 2001, the Marin County Community Health Survey looked at education levels among
parents of children under five years old, comparing those with incomes above 300% of the
Federal Poverty Line to those below. A full 99% of middle to upper income parents had
graduated from high school, with 94% going on to higher education. In contrast, only 70%
of low-income parents (below 300% of the FPL) graduated from high school, with 42%
continuing on to college. Parents with higher levels of education usually have greater access
to resources and income that creates a stable environment. Parents in our focus groups
expressed a desire for more adult education opportunities, such as English as a Second
Language and technical or vocational classes. (Marin County Community Health Survey and
Family Support Focus Groups)
• When asked about how often families in Marin get together with friends or relatives, low
income parents reported significantly less frequent social contact than their higher income
counterparts. In family focus groups for this project, many Latino immigrant families
discussed the challenges of
isolation, not having family
members nearby and not
knowing their neighbors.
(Family Support Focus Groups)
• Ninety percent of parents
report that a park or open
space is within walking
distance. Parents report that
having a walkable neighbor-
hood is the top asset in their
community. Almost half of
low-income parents report that
they take their children to the
park 20 or more days per
month, which is much higher
than the state average. (Family Support Survey and Focus Groups)
Figure 12. Families Using the Park 20 or more Days During the
Last Month
48%
16%
11%
7%
0%
20%
40%
60%
Below 300% of the
Federal Poverty Level
Above 300% of the
Federal Poverty Level
California Marin
20. Page 14
• Youth in Marin have higher measures of resiliency, including caring relationships with an
adult, high expectations from an adult, and opportunities for meaningful participation in
both school and community settings than youth statewide. However, low-income families
consistently expressed a need for more affordable afterschool and summer activities for
children and youth. (Marin Family Support Survey and Focus Groups)
• In focus groups, parents of young children reported that they are seeking resources and
groups for families that are informal, community-based, drop-in, and free. Both family
members and providers reported that most families learn about services and resources from
friends, family members, and schools. (Marin Family Support Focus Groups)
IV Cross Cutting Issues
Across all domains and stakeholder levels the following issues emerged
consistently from the community assessment and planning process. These
cross cutting issues inform how we understand, develop and
communicate about the work of supporting families. They reflect
families’ ongoing struggles and the heightened strain of our current
reality. The cross cutting issues must be addressed for the County to
achieve the vision of a coordinated, accessible and culturally relevant
family support system.
1. Changing Demographics
Marin’s child population is growing faster than any Bay Area county. At the same time the County is
becoming increasingly ethnically diverse as the Latino population has doubled in the last eight years.
Clearly, this has implications for both the allocation of countywide resources and for the approach
to serving families. The family support system must expand to serve a growing population, and do
so in a manner that is culturally and linguistically appropriate.
2. Economic Climate
Marin families are experiencing significant financial hardships unlike any seen since the Great
Depression. Even before the economic downturn, about one-third of Marin’s households were
unable to pay basic living expenses and were not considered to be self-sufficient. Because the self-
sufficiency standard, or the amount of money required to meet basic needs, is so high in Marin,
many families are seeking assistance and support for the first time due to the recession. This means
that demand for public assistance is growing at the same time those resources are diminishing.
3. Accessible Services
There are a number of barriers to services that surfaced across all domains. Lack of transportation
was often cited by families as a major obstacle, especially for those outside of the more urban areas
like the Canal and Central San Rafael. The need for more bilingual services was also frequently
mentioned. Federally-defined requirements for many services, e.g. the Federal Poverty Level, pose
another challenge to families in Marin and the Bay Area. Many families have incomes well above
what qualifies for subsidized services and yet struggle to meet basic needs because the cost of living
is so high. Finally, families and providers repeatedly stressed the importance of services that are
easily accessible and flexible in nature, such as those that are school-based and neighborhood-based.
21. Page 15
4. Opportunities for Linking and Leveraging Services
Marin County has a wide range of services that provide families with resources in all areas of their
lives. However, understanding the many non-profits, school districts, and local governmental
agencies is a challenge for providers and families alike. Developing an effective resource and referral
system, and moving beyond it to create a coordinated system of care, is particularly critical during
difficult financial times.
5. Building Capacity for Family Support Practice
For our family support system to be truly responsive and reflective of communities in Marin,
families must be included in decision-making and seen as a critical partner. While the majority of
providers responding to the family support provider survey felt that the family support principles
described their organizations’ philosophies, they also identified challenges to integrating the
principles into their work. Organizations expressed challenges such as not having sufficient time or
training to engage families, services being tied to billable hours, insufficient bi-lingual/bi-cultural
staff, difficultly referring to and/or collaborating with other agencies, and challenges engaging
parents who work long hours. In addition, the family support system needs to work towards
continual improvement and integration of promising and evidence based practices, while
maintaining a commitment to the unique communities we serve.
V The Blueprint Framework
This section of the Blueprint details strategies for achieving our vision
of a countywide family support system. As described in the
introduction, the Blueprint draws upon the Spectrum of Prevention as
our organizing framework for the development of a comprehensive
community approach to family support.
The Spectrum of Prevention was developed by Larry Cohen while
working as Director of Prevention Programs at the Contra Costa
County Health Department. It has been used nationally in public health
and prevention initiatives targeting issues such as violence prevention,
injury prevention, nutrition, and fitness. In Marin, it is currently being used by the Healthy Marin
Partnership as a framework for targeting obesity, alcohol abuse, and smoking. The Spectrum
framework includes seven complementary levels for strategy development that, when used together,
result in greater impact than would be possible by implementing any single activity or initiative.
The Steering Committee used the Spectrum of Prevention to identify existing and promising family
support strategies that address the needs of Marin families. As the planning process progressed, we
found it most useful to consolidate the original seven levels into three stakeholder levels. These
represent the level of stakeholder that is most directly impacted by the strategies, i.e. family and
community members, providers and organizations, and leadership and policymakers. Ideally, the
Family Support System integrates a continual flow of information, feedback, and learning among all
three of these stakeholder levels. The Family Support Principles illustrate how all of these levels are
vital to creating families, organizations, and communities that thrive. The full Spectrum and
consolidated stakeholder levels are detailed on the following page:
22. Page 16
Stakeholder Level Spectrum of Prevention Level
Influencing Policy and Legislation:
Legislation and other policy initiatives are among the most effective
strategies for achieving broad goals. Both formal and informal policies
have the ability to affect large numbers of people by improving the
environments in which they live and work, encouraging people to lead
healthy lifestyles, and providing for family protections.
Leadership
&
Policymakers
Mobilizing Neighborhoods and Communities:
Addressing today's social and public health problems requires a
community as well as a medical approach. We must be willing to
meet with communities and share the agenda, prioritizing community
concerns as well as provider/department goals.
Changing Organizational Practices: Modifying the internal
policies and practices of agencies and institutions can result in
improved support for staff of the organization, better services for
clients, and a healthier community environment. Advocating for
organizational change at agencies such as law enforcement, schools and
health departments can result in a broad impact on family support.
Fostering Coalitions and Networks:
Coalitions and networks can be powerful advocates for legislation and
organizational change. They also provide an opportunity for collaborative
planning, resource coordination, and system-wide problem solving.
Service
Providers
&
Organizations
Educating Providers:
Strategies can reach a broad range of family support providers who
have daily contact with large numbers of families in a variety of
settings, building their capacity to transmit skills and knowledge to
others.
Promoting Community Education:
The goals of community education are to reach the greatest number of
individuals possible, as well as to build a critical mass of people who are or
will become involved in supporting families.
Family &
Community
Members
Strengthening Individual Knowledge & Skills: Working
directly with family and community members in all settings can enhance an
individual's capability to support their own and/or other families.
23. Page 17
VI Strategies for Achieving Our Vision: Overview
The strategies incorporated in the Blueprint represent what is needed to
create an effective system of family support. They are a combination of
existing strategies currently underway in the County and promising new
ideas that have shown success in other communities.
We recognize that at first glance, the Strategy section can be
overwhelming. However, this Blueprint is intended to be the framework
for building a comprehensive family support system. In such a complex
field, the strategies cover a broad range of needs, approaches, domains,
and stakeholder levels. While the majority of these strategies are
currently in place, many are not operating at the level needed to meet the expressed need of the
community, and in addition, some of the strategies were in danger of being cut as the Blueprint went
to print. The goal of the Blueprint, especially during such a shifting landscape, is to provide a lasting,
community recording of all of the strategies that are essential to the family support system.
With that in mind, we have organized the strategies to maximize their usefulness to all family
support stakeholders, as follows:
1. Stakeholder Level. First strategies are organized by stakeholder level. These stakeholder levels
include Family and Community Members, Service Providers and Organizations, and Leadership
and Policymakers.
2. High Leverage Opportunities. Within each stakeholder level, the Steering Committee has
identified high leverage opportunities. These involve strategies that are most viable because they are
connected to a specific opportunity in the coming year, e.g. stimulus funding, departmental
reorganization, existing priority among major organization, institution or coalition, etc. They are
also considered high leverage because they can begin to have an impact on families, providers, or
policies within a year – something the Steering Committee felt was especially important in these
difficult economic times. At each stakeholder level, the first high leverage opportunities is a
Coordination strategy, which specifically addresses the need for better linking and leveraging of
family support efforts at and between each Stakeholder Level. The current economic climate
makes the emphasis on a coordinated and accessible system even more critical, so special
attention has been given to these strategies.
3. Family Support Strategies. Finally, the remaining strategies for that stakeholder level are listed.
They each have an icon indicating which community assessment domain they address. As
mentioned above, while the majority of the strategies included in this Blueprint are already being
implemented to varying degrees throughout the county, they are not able to meet the level of
need. And as families’ needs and stressors are increasing, the resources and services available to
support them are being reduced or cut altogether.
24. Page 18
VII Families and Community Member Level Strategies
Stakeholder Level: Families and Community Members
This stakeholder level includes Strengthening Individual Skills and Knowledge and Promoting Community
Education. The Blueprint envisions family and community members as both the focus of family
support efforts and also as partners and resources to each other. Family support strategies at the
family and community member level contribute to families that are healthy, self-sufficient and
interconnected, and physically and emotionally secure; and to children that live in safe and nurturing
environments that foster optimal physical, intellectual, social and emotional development.
High Leverage Opportunity
Coordination at the Level of Family and Community Members
New Opportunity: Due to the current economic crisis, it is especially important to support
family and community members to develop and build on their own informal and community
based resources. Groups provide social support, information on child development, other
essential resources, or links to civic engagement activities. They all provide a basis for
relationships and skill-building which build and maintain resiliency during difficult times.
Existing Capacity: There is currently a wide range of informal resources within Marin
communities, including playgroups, mothers’ and fatherhood groups, co-op preschools, faith-
based resources, Promatoras, community gardens, cultural and arts groups, and many more.
Recommended Actions: Convene these groups to come together and share information
through vehicles such as learning communities. Link these groups to one another and to
other Stakeholder Levels to help ensure that they reach families and are effective, self-
sustaining, and connected to a broader family support system.
High Leverage Opportunity - Supportive Services for Pregnant and
Postpartum Families
New Opportunity: Early Head Start stimulus funds, Bella Vista funding, Kaiser Community
Grants, the Mental Health Services Act, and Dept. of Health and Human Services (HHS)
resources are possible resources for serving families impacted by or at-risk for postpartum
depression. Leveraging these resources could improve coordination of services, as well as
increase Early Head Start, other homevisiting, and Centering Pregnancy group prenatal care,
all of which are evidence-based practices.
Existing Capacity: HHS Integrated Clinics provides prenatal care for many of Marin’s
families with greatest need, and Marin Head Start is has a well-established Early Head Start
program in the County. There are also a number of efforts in the County that provide
support for families that are impacted by postpartum depression, including: screening,
support groups, individual counseling, and limited homevisiting services.
Recommended Actions: HHS Community Health and Prevention Services will continue to
convene the providers of these services to improve coordination, offer professional
development and training opportunities, and identify options for expanding programs. Family
Support Steering Committee members have signed letters of support for an Early Head Start
expansion in Marin, which would provide services to teen parents and other families.
25. Page 19
Domain Family Support Strategies Targeting Families and Community Members
$
Outreach to low-income families and promote free tax preparation services and Individual
Taxpayer Identification Number assistance to increase utilization of federal tax benefits such as
Earned Income Tax Credit.
$ Outreach to low-income families to promote Individual Development Accounts aimed at home
ownership, small business and continuing education or training.
$ Provide comprehensive financial education in multiple languages throughout the county (credit
building, access to mainstream financial services, budgeting, and asset protection).
$ Link families to coordinated income support services (CalWorks, SSI, Social Security, SDI, PFL
benefits, food stamps, WIC, school food program, childcare, CHI products, Pharmacy cards)
$ Provide one-stop employment and training support for individuals seeking opportunities for self-
employment.
$ Provide accessible vocational training opportunities in multiple languages.
$ Provide eviction prevention and rental assistance.
$
Provide school based outreach to increase families’ awareness of free and reduced school
breakfast and lunch services; explore and address barriers to families applying for and
obtaining free meals.
☺ Provide individual peer support groups and peer mentoring
☺ Provide parenting support via home-visiting services for families, pregnancy through age 3 (i.e.
Nurse Family Partnership) and parent coaching
☺
Provide evidence-based therapy and support services for young families with unique needs.
e.g., PCAT, PCIT, Infant-Parent Psychotherapy, CTI- Parent Child Psychotherapy treatment for
trauma exposure, and Triple P.
☺ Provide post-partum depression support groups
☺ Provide depression screening and referral at childcare sites
☺
Provide coordinated behavioral health services in schools. Utilize a range of forums such as
school Student Study Teams and School Attendance Review Boards for reaching families.
☺ Provide adolescent mental health services
☺ Provide intensive family services for parents participating in domestic violence, mental health,
and drug courts.
☺ Provide Medi-Cal and sliding scale mental health services
☺ Provide mental health outreach, education, screening, and early intervention for at-risk
populations
☺ Provide suicide prevention and outreach services to underserved communities
☺ Provide individual substance abuse treatment services and peer support services
☺ Coordinate media resources to mobilize parents to take action related to high-risk alcohol use
and other ATOD issues
☺ Disseminate information on the web on most current research related to high risk alcohol use
and other ATOD issues
Key: $ = Family Economics ☺ = Behavioral Health = Health Access & Physical Health
= Education ♥ = Family Resiliency
26. Page 20
Domain Family Support Strategies Targeting Families and Community Members
Provide one-stop outreach enrollment and retention for children’s health insurance products
and link all families to a medical home.
Provide community-based health education and health literacy activities (i.e. Promotores)
Provide health education / reproductive health care services to teens and low-income families
to prevent pregnancy / unwanted pregnancy
Provide group prenatal and well-child care (i.e. Centering Pregnancy and Centering Parenting)
Provide community-based health education related to pregnancy and early parenting
Provide breastfeeding support and education by both peers and professionals and promote
pro-breastfeeding norms via social marketing campaigns
Provide peer led community education related to nutrition and access to food
Provide families with skills and resources to walk and bike within their community safely
Provide oral health outreach, screening, and follow-up
Provide high quality formal early learning experiences
Provide informal early learning opportunities and playgroups etc.
Educate parents about child development and support them in their parenting (i.e. Triple P)
Educate parents about the school system and related processes and encourage/promote
parents’ involvement in their children’s schools
Provide family literacy programs (i.e. Raising a Reader, Bring Me a Book)
Link students to support services to ensure their academic success
Provide affordable and desirable afterschool and summer tutoring and enrichment opportunities
Utilize clinics and childcare centers to identify and assess young children’s special needs and
coordinate / link them with appropriate resources,
Provide parent education to identify and support for families whose children have special needs
Establish therapeutic preschool to meet needs of children who need enhanced services
♥ Provide families with skills and resources to participate in community gardens
♥ Provide school-based resource and referral services
♥ Provide faith based supports, resource and referrals
♥ Provide youth mentoring services
♥ Strengthen skills and opportunities for youth in the juvenile justice program (i.e. Youth Court)
♥ Provide schoolwide programs to increase awareness of cultural, social, emotional issues
♥ Train emerging parent leaders to serve as informal resources within preschool and K-12 sites
♥ Coordinate family education to increase utilization of outdoor and recreational opportunities
Key: $ = Family Economics ☺ = Behavioral Health = Health Access & Physical Health
= Education ♥ = Family Resiliency
27. Page 21
VIII Service Providers and Organizations Level Strategies
Stakeholder Level: Service Providers and Organizations
This stakeholder level includes Educating Providers, Fostering Coalitions and Networks, and Changing
Organizational Practice. Currently, providers are the core of the county’s family support system, and
warrant ongoing capacity building to improve skills, practices and coordination. Family support
efforts at this level contribute to providers’ ability to offer services and resources that are
coordinated, accessible, welcoming to families and reflective of the County’s growing diversity. The
result is a family-centered countywide system of family support with multiple points of entry that are
coordinated across all domains, e.g. physical and mental health, education, economics.
High Leverage Opportunity
Coordination at the Level of Service Providers and Organizations
Link and Leverage Services to Create a Coordinated System of Family Support
New Opportunity: The release of the Blueprint could generate increased involvement and
philanthropic support for coordination of family support efforts. Due to the current economic
crisis, it is essential that family support providers better coordinate their efforts in order to
identify and respond to increased needs and dwindling resources.
Existing Capacity: There are existing coordination points for service providers groups, such as
the Coordinating Council, that effectively engage a range of family support providers.
Recommended Actions: Explore the feasibility of building upon existing groups to integrate a
renewed focus on family support. Explore potential funding to support these groups, e.g.
United Way. Develop a group structure to engage essential family support providers in the
County and prioritize possible functions of the group, including:
• Build a common language related to family support and social determinants of health
• Provide a forum for networking, working across disciplines, and communicating with family
support partners
• Leverage resources, e.g. support providers’ grant writing and planning efforts, discuss
collaborative funding opportunities
• Coordinate training and professional development
• Explore and develop strategies for integrating services
• Look at gaps, needs, capacity and resources across the County to better focus resources and
collaborative efforts
• Build and maintain effective resource and referral strategies
• Coordinate service provider fair
• Discuss and disseminate information about trends and opportunities in family support
• Identify strategies make services more accessible and to reach geographically isolated and
hidden populations
• Build cultural humility across service delivery systems
• Learn how to effectively engage families and support direct services staff to influence and
inform decisions at the policy level
28. Page 22
High Leverage Opportunity – Resource and Referral
New Opportunity: The County Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is dedicating
staff time to improve access to information about HHS and community resources. HHS will
work with 211, Network of Care for Kids, and www.HealthyMarin.org to keep information
current, coordinate information sharing, and promote the appropriate use of these
underutilized resource and referral systems in the community.
Existing Capacity: At the same time that the current economic crisis has created a demand for
services which is unprecedented, both direct services and the outreach necessary to provide
access to those services are being cut. We need to find alternative ways to sustain the work of
programs such as School Linked Services, which has provided a substantial hub for resource
and referral services for the past many years.
Recommended Actions: Family Support Steering Committee members will be invited to
partner with DHHS to participate in an assessment of resource and referral services, and
develop mechanisms for maintenance and promotion of an effective system.
High Leverage Opportunity – School-Based Services
New Opportunity: There is a range of possible funding sources for school-based services, under
the umbrella of Community Schools, including Stimulus funding (e.g. Title I, Race to the Top),
federal Full-Service Community-School grants, the East Bay Community Schools Network, and
wide-spread interest among local foundations.
Existing Capacity: Marin’s School-Linked Services model is a community school approach, as
are many of the current and former Healthy Start sites. Although SLS is being discontinued, its
legacy makes Marin well-positioned to adopt models such as Community Schools, which are
public schools that combine the best educational practices with a wide range of vital in-house
health and social services to ensure that families are engaged and supported, and children are
physically, emotionally and socially prepared to learn. In this model, the school site becomes a
community hub, and is available for community use after school hours.
Recommended Actions: Exit interviews between School Linked Services staff and school
officials will compile information about district needs and offer information about potential
linkages that may assist with meeting these needs. Health and social service providers will be
seeking new ways to connect with schools in the absence of SLS, and will need to identify
mechanism for building this coordination.
29. Page 23
High Leverage Opportunity - Food and Nutrition
New Opportunity: A recent convergence of factors presents an unprecedented opportunity to
build new linkages between food security, nutrition education and sustainability efforts. These
factors include the roll out of the revised WIC food package, additional ARRA supplemental
food funding, increased countywide access to Farmer's Markets and Farm Stands, as well as
multiple grassroots efforts to improve local agricultural capacity. As the need for supplemental
food increases in the community, there is increased opportunity to develop innovative and
family-friendly partnerships that increase access to healthy foods.
Existing Capacity: The Marin Community Foundation recently sponsored a Food Summit, a
convening of food pantries and food banks. As a result, Department of Health and Human
Services Policy & Planning will lead an effort to map food security resources available through
the pantries, schools and food banks in the county and develop recommendations to enhance
food access. Concurrently, Marin Master Gardeners is conducting an assessment of community
gardens in Marin and Marin Link is planning to conduct a community food assessment in hopes
of integrating all of this work.
Recommended Actions: Integrate the recommendations of these various groups to develop a
comprehensive food system assessment and develop an on-going network or coalition to
address these issues. Bring these recommendations to funders such as Marin Community
Foundation for consideration through the Food Summit and Improving Community Health.
Domain Family Support Strategies Targeting Service Providers and Organizations
$ Educate providers about how to apply for food, rental and income support services
$ Coordinate and collaborate with food distribution sites
$ Focus employment and training on career ladders for living wage jobs and entrepreneurial
interests in growing sectors
☺ Train peer support providers to provide home visiting services
☺ Train childcare providers to identify and respond to behavioral concerns in the classroom and
to work effectively with families on these and other issues
☺ Train childcare providers to promote healthy social emotional development using evidence-
based practices ( i.e. evidence-based curricula such as Second Step)
☺ Educate providers to support early attachment and promote early childhood mental health
using evidence based- practices ( i.e., Promoting First Relationships, DC: 0-3)
☺ Train providers in evidence based practices to address domestic violence, trauma, etc.
☺ Provide integrated behavioral health in healthcare settings
☺ Provide universal screening for postpartum depression / domestic violence / perinatal
substance abuse
Develop facilitated and coordinated referrals between medical safety net providers
Key: $ = Family Economics ☺ = Behavioral Health = Health Access & Physical Health
= Education ♥ = Family Resiliency
30. Page 24
Domain Family Support Strategies Targeting Service Providers and Organizations
Assess and address barriers such as cost, wait time, etc. to accessing health care in
community clinics
Employ medical volunteerism to increase access to health services for low-income families
Provide mobile, school and ECE- centered, and community-based health care services
Work with schools to make health education comprehensive and impactful
Work with employers to develop policies and practices that encourage breastfeeding in the
workplace
Convene stakeholders to prevent obesity
Recruit culturally and language competent ECE and K-12 staff and provide training for all
teachers so they can better support English Learners and children of different cultures
Provide family advocates in child care centers
Strengthen kindergarten transition supports
Strengthen articulation between Pre-K and K-12 programs
Strengthen system for linking students to support services
Capture additional funding to address students’ academic needs
Develop program and educational strategies to keep teen parents enrolled in school
Support K-12 culture that meets the needs of low performing students
♥ Identify and promote use of key information and referral hotlines
♥ Provide family support training and technical assistance for providers promoting family
resiliency and informal supports
♥ Provide community based service hubs through Community Schools, existing agencies and/or
Family Resource Centers
♥ Coordinate male involvement / father involvement coalitions / networks
♥ Encourage grassroots neighborhood council – join planning advocacy, and community
development
♥ Outreach and education to organizations that run events to infuse family friendly policies and
practices
♥ Create child friendly community spaces
♥ Provide safe afterschool spaces for youth
♥ Coordinate community policing efforts
Key: $ = Family Economics ☺ = Behavioral Health = Health Access & Physical Health
= Education ♥ = Family Resiliency
31. Page 25
IX Leadership and Policymakers Level Strategies
Stakeholder Level: Leadership and Policymakers
This stakeholder level includes Mobilizing Communities and Neighborhoods and Influencing Policy and
Legislation. Family support efforts at this level aim to create a county where leaders and policymakers
of all types share in the responsibility of contributing to the wellbeing of families. This means that
Marin has policies that are responsive to needs and strengths of families in this County and that
strengthen family support services and resources; community leaders are empowered to work
collectively to help families thrive; and funders are active partners in generating and sustaining family
support resources. In other words, all stakeholders work collectively to build the systems,
infrastructure and political will needed to implement this Blueprint.
High Leverage Opportunity
Coordination at the Level of Leadership and Policymakers
Build a Coordinated Approach and the Political Will for Family Support Across the County
New Opportunity: The release of the Family Support Blueprint provides an opportunity to share
this vision and framework with leadership and policymakers throughout the County, and
develop policies and infrastructure that supports children, families and communities to thrive.
Existing Capacity: The Family Steering Committee membership is currently comprised of a
number of professionals that are influential in the field of Family Support. In addition, there are
a range of grassroots community leadership groups in the County, including Parent Voices,
School Readiness Initiative Advisory Boards, Grassroots Leadership Network, Sustainable
Marin, the Concilio, ISOJI, and the Hispanic, Latino, Indigenous People of Novato.
Recommended Actions: Continue to convene the Family Support Steering Committee and
expand membership to include leadership from grassroots community groups, local
municipalities, “non-traditional” family support providers and other policymakers. The
Committee could eventually function as a “hub of hubs”, coordinating the following functions:
• Identify priority issues (from the Family Support Blueprint) to work on in the
committee, and at the regional, county, and/or city levels
• Solicit input on policy issues from families and service providers
• Develop and/or coordinate advocacy campaigns for family support overall and specific
related issues
• Conduct and/or share policy analyses and discuss their implications across domains
• Share information, funding opportunities and updates
• Give feedback and input on initiatives, grants, policies, plans – from the organizations
represented and their constituencies
• Influence City and County planning efforts (monitor city council or Board agendas)
• Identify champions and build political will throughout County
• Leverage resources and coordinate fund development efforts, e.g. build collaborative
relationships with funders, assist with submitting RFPs in coordinated fashion and with
letters of support
• Assess progress in realizing the family support vision
32. Page 26
High Leverage Opportunity - Public Health / HHS Restructuring
New Opportunity: The Marin County Division of Public Health (DPH) is currently undergoing
a reorganization process, aimed at better utilizing public health resources to build the Division’s
capacity to more directly reach the community and address the social determinants of health to
affect change. The development of a new organizational domain focusing on children and
family services may lead to increased opportunities to leverage resources for a range of family
support strategies.
Existing Capacity: The newly released Family Support Blueprint will help to inform decisions
related how existing public health resources will support families in Marin.
Recommended Actions: The Children and Families team within DPH will conduct a program
assessment aimed at best leveraging program goals, funding streams, staff skills, and other
community resources. Staff will continue to collect information from other public health
departments about innovative partnerships that offer essential services for families.
High Leverage Opportunity
Marin Community Foundation, Improving Community Health
New Opportunity: Marin Community Foundation has embarked upon a community grants
process aimed at Improving Community Health, and in collaboration with leaders from the
County Department of Health and Human Services, Healthy Marin Partnership, First 5 Marin,
and others. The work will focus on community health activities including grantmaking and
technical assistance in the areas of providing health insurance for children, strengthening the
delivery of health services, and addressing the social determinants of health.
Existing Capacity: This partnership engages leadership from some of the most active
organizations providing preventative and family focused healthcare in the community.
Recommended Actions: This group will continue to help guide strategic efforts to improve
community health in Marin.
High Leverage Opportunity
Very Low Income Housing and Homeless Prevention
New Opportunity: The Homeless Policy Committee will be redeveloping the Housing
Component of Marin’s Ten Year Plan to End Homelessness. While federal leadership has in
times past focused on chronic individual homelessness, new legislation and stimulus funding
broadens the focus of homeless efforts to homeless prevention and increased focus on family
homelessness. Family Support Steering Committee members have been invited to participate in
the county-wide Homeless Policy Committee to advocate for increased very low income family
housing and homeless prevention funding to be directed to families.
Existing Capacity: The Homeless Policy Committee will oversee the new Housing Component
of the Ten Year Plan, which will be influenced by a new housing options feasibility study led by
the Department of Health and Human Services in partnership with Marin Housing Authority,
Community Development, and the Continuum of Housing and Services. MCF’s Affordable
Housing Initiative provides additional opportunities for funding.
Recommended Actions: This group will increasingly influence homeless and housing policy in
Marin, with a growing focus on families
33. Page 27
Domain Family Support Strategies Targeting Leadership and Policymakers
$ Use self-sufficiency index to raise awareness of Federal Poverty Level issue and advocate for
policy changes
$ Advocate for living wage
$ Advocate for equity in workforce investment for green jobs
$ Advocate for a permanent warming center
$ Campaign for affordable housing on a city level
$ Create cooperative housing, community land trusts
☺ Mobilize parents and youth within local or school communities to address high risk alcohol use
☺ Advocate for MediCal reimbursement for DC: 0-3 diagnostic criteria (Diagnostic Classification of
Mental Health and Developmental Disorders of Infancy and Early Childhood)
Support development and implementation of ECE and school wellness policies
Support advocacy for universal healthcare
Educate and mobilize community members to advocate with leadership to adopt policies to
increase access to healthy foods
Encourage parent leadership and advocacy in schools
Train and mobilize parents to advocate for child care/early learning opportunities
Mobilize parents to advocate for public education
Mobilize parents to advocate for educational equity
Advocate for increased child care/early learning opportunities
Advocate for public education supports
♥ Coordinate opportunities for youth leadership and civic engagement
♥ Educate and mobilize community members to advocate with leadership to adopt policies for
safe, walkable communities
♥ Coordinate community gardens efforts
♥ Support families to form and participate in informal playgroups and peer support groups, and
informal respite care
♥ Develop policies mandating that community events and community spaces be family friendly
♥ Policy bodies in the County consider “Is it good for the kids?” when decisions are made
♥ Create countywide system to support community gardens
Key: $ = Family Economics ☺ = Behavioral Health = Health Access & Physical Health
= Education ♥ = Family Resiliency
34. Page 28
X Next Steps
This Family Support Blueprint offers a vision of Marin County that
will guide our policies and practice in support of families for years to
come. For the first time, we have a countywide blueprint for
supporting families across all service sectors and domains of family
life. At this moment of unprecedented economic crisis, it is even more
critical to have a plan for supporting families in difficult times. The
Blueprint is built upon the understanding that family is the most
fundamental influence in the lives and outcomes of children, and
families are strong when they are supported by safe and thriving
neighborhoods.
The Family Support Blueprint is a living document shared by the community. To help bring this
document and the vision within it to life, Marin Community Health and Prevention Services will
continue to convene a Family Support Steering Committee, which will now work towards the
implementation of the family support strategies identified in the Blueprint. The Family Support
Steering Committee plans to focus our collective work in a number of ways in the coming years.
These include:
• Disseminating the Blueprint to policymakers, service providers, and family members as a
response to the current economic crisis. The Blueprint is a tool which can help to generate
political will in support of families. Future presentations of the Blueprint by Steering
Committee members will include Healthy Marin Partnership, Marin Community Foundation,
Bella Vista Foundation, Marin Child Care Commission, and Marin County Office of Education.
• Building a policy/leadership committee with broad consensus and representation via the
Family Support Steering Committee. The Steering Committee members will share
representation on other policy committees and will serve as a “hub of hubs” for families.
• Creating linkages and systems for communication among all stakeholder levels, with a
special consideration of how to engage families and policymakers. These linkages should include
mutual feedback, shared leadership, and a focus on finding solutions during difficult economic
times. The Steering Committee will help to create tools for communication among
stakeholders, so that Marin is poised to respond to opportunities quickly, such as leveraging
resources and coordinating advocacy.
• Responding to trends, crises and needs of families, while at the same time working to
address the high-leverage strategies identified in the Blueprint. The Steering Committee will
review the Blueprint to assure that the strategies and opportunities represented in it are current
and relevant to Marin’s families. As part of this process the group may develop indicators to
track progress on strategies, participate in further assessment activities, develop new
partnerships and define new opportunities.
As we move forward with these next steps, the Blueprint as a framework is only as strong as the
community that is built around it. We will continue our commitment as a community to share the
responsibility for the wellbeing of families in Marin.