3. Introduction
• Military surgeons frequently treat combat gunshot
wounds.
• Civilian Gun Shot Wound (GSW) of the limb is not
uncommon in wartime but it differs from peace
time casualty in terms of contamination and
wounding potential of firearms.
• There is always a decision making dilemma to
divide wounds for conservative irrigation and
aggressive debridement.
12. Minor GSW
Fresh wound<24 hours
Apparently clean wound of <2cm in diameter
(entry/exit)
No major vessel or nerve injury
No fracture or joint involvement
16. All wounds were left open and redressed daily to
check for infections
Noninfected wounds were closed delayed primarily
(within 4-6 days)
Infected wounds underwent daily aseptic dressing
until they were fit for secondary closure (SC) or
fasciocutaneous flap (FCF) or Split Thickness Skin
Grafting (STSG)
All patients were given a 3-5 days course of
antibiotics
17.
18. Result
Total 11(20%) patients developed wound infection;
among them
2(4%) in irrigation group and
9(16%) in aggressive wound debridement group.
70% patient returned to normal life and activity
within 6 weeks,
Rest 30% have returned to work with some
limitations and modifications of life style.
19.
20.
21.
22. Discussion
The success of war wound surgery depends on
strict adherence to four basic principle i.e.
meticulous wound cleaning/debridement
immobilization
delayed wound coverage
antibiotics.
23. Take home message
“It is the wound, not the bullet”- is the decision
making principle
It is better to be on the side of aggressive excision
rather than to be conservative
24. Conclusion
War surgery is always difficult because
• both the patients and doctors are in adverse
situation and
• resource constraints usually compound the
problem.
However according to the laid down criteria and by
dint of clinical knowledge and experience the
wounds can be properly grouped and treated by
debridement and irrigation.