ENUM in Austria A story of high expectations and low usage figures Kurt Reichinger Austrian Regulatory Authority for  Telecommunications and Broadcasting 19.05.2009 .my ENUM Seminar – Kuala Lumpur The opinions expressed in this presentation are the personal view of the author and do not prejudge decisions of the Austrian regulatory authorities.
One of my slides from 2001 … 19.05.2009 .my ENUM Seminar – Kuala Lumpur Page
…  and Usage Figures from 2009 Page    19.05.2009 .my ENUM Seminar – Kuala Lumpur
Agenda What is ENUM?  >> The Austrian ENUM Story Lessons Learned Way Forward Page    1 2 3 0
The Austrian ENUM Story 1 Page
Phases of the Austrian ENUM Story Page    Warming  Forming  Storming  Norming  Performing  Mourning  19.05.2009 .my ENUM Seminar – Kuala Lumpur
From    Warming to    Forming … August 2001 First public consultation conducted by RTR (i.e. the Austrian Regulatory Authority) February 2002 (User) ENUM Workshop organized by RTR Group of interested partners formed    Austrian ENUM Trial Platform May 2002 Delegation request by RTR to RIPE, ITU-TSB for 3.4.e164.arpa June 2002 3.4.e164.arpa delegated to RTR ENUM Tier 1 Registry in operation by NIC.AT (i.e. Austrian ccTLD Registry) September 2002 Austrian ENUM Trial Platform officially established Page    19.05.2009 .my ENUM Seminar – Kuala Lumpur
RTR‘s main focus in phase  1/2 Acting as an enabler for innovative technology §1 Austrian Telecommunications Act mandates promotion of innovation Inform market players – discuss opportunities and threats  White paper Public consultation(s) Public workshop Prepare landscape for first trials Providing platform for interested parties Clarify responsibilities regarding Austrian ENUM Domain File application for delegation of Austrian ENUM Domain Persuade the sceptics  Page    19.05.2009 .my ENUM Seminar – Kuala Lumpur
ENUM Tier 1 Registry Responsibility for Numbering in Austria (+43)    RTR, i.e. the Regulatory Authority Responsibility for Austrian ENUM Domain (3.4.e164.arpa)    RTR Responsibility for ENUM Tier 1 Registry General    RTR Admin Contact    RTR Tech + Zone Contact    Outsourced to nic.at (later to found enum.at) ENUM trial framework between RTR-GmbH and trial partners Policy framework for ENUM trial in Austria Evaluating processes between registry and registrars Working on (re-)validation processes regarding the right to use number Page    19.05.2009 .my ENUM Seminar – Kuala Lumpur
From     Storming to     Norming … September 2002 ENUM Tier 2 Name Server in operation by Telekom Austria November 2002  Policy Framework available Official start of Austrian ENUM trial First Live Demo in Atlanta, GA (Fall VON) December 2002  Ready to invite friendly ENUM subscribers and users October 2003  1st part of trial completed, 2nd phase (business customers) started December 2003  Large Scale ENUM and VoIP Pilot started at Vienna University (AT43) Page    19.05.2009 .my ENUM Seminar – Kuala Lumpur
RTR‘s main focus in phase  3/4 Ensuring integrity of E.164 Numbering Space and related 3.4.e164.arpa ENUM Domain Space Compilation of transparent framework for usage of Austrian ENUM Domain Definition of requirements regarding identification and validation Ensuring adherence to the framework Enabling of maximum competition on ENUM Tier 2 level ENUM Registrar, ENUM Name Server Provider, ENUM Validation Entity ENUM Service Provider Consumer Protection Ensuring secrecy of telecommunications Preventing lock-in scenarios Ensuring end-customer opt-in Page    19.05.2009 .my ENUM Seminar – Kuala Lumpur
The Legal Framework (I) New Austrian Telecommunications Law (TKG 2003) In force since August 20 th  2003 Based on the New European Legal Framework New Austrian Numbering Ordinance In force since May 12 th  2004, Amendment of October 18 th  2006 Taking ENUM into account +43 720 for national portable numbers and VoIP (semi-nomadic) +43 780 for VoIP and ENUM (nomadic) Definition of number ranges to be available for ENUM    see next slide Page    19.05.2009 .my ENUM Seminar – Kuala Lumpur
Number Ranges made available for ENUM Page    19.05.2009 .my ENUM Seminar – Kuala Lumpur Numbers for convergent services - (0)780  F Designated for the use with ENUM Gateway to the PSTN required   Private networks - 05 C Numbers directly assigned to enduser   Validation via assignment document Mobile numbers - (0)6 B Also pre-paid numbers are usable Validation by premium rate SMS Geographic numbers  A (Used to be) Most common numbers  Validation by postal mail and PIN Location independent fixed network numbers  - (0)720  E Usable for VoIP Also possible as „Personal Numbers“   Toll free numbers - (0)800  D Commercially interesting numbers Validation via assignment document
ENUM-driven Number Range (0)780 Number format: +43 780 abcdef (ghi) Prior delegation of ENUM domain required for assignment of number Registrar has to provide a Generic Gateway (for this number range) Cancellation of ENUM domain will (also) relinquish the number No validation problem as the domain delegation is necessary as the first step (domains delegated on a first come first served policy) Decoupling of number range allocation and gateway operator Any gateway may route the whole number range, just needs to be able to query ENUM    These gateways are called Generic Gateways (GG) Commercial delegation of domains starting May 2005 19.05.2009 .my ENUM Seminar – Kuala Lumpur
The Generic Gateway Page    Generic Gateway Calling Party A   Called Party B   Registration PSTN ENUMTier 1 ENUMTier 2 Internet 19.05.2009 .my ENUM Seminar – Kuala Lumpur
And finally from     Performing to    M ourning … October 2003 Decision to start preparation for commercial deployment May 2004 New Numbering Ordinance defines ENUM-driven number range (780) August 2004 Contract signed with enum.at concerning a commercial phase November 2004 End of ENUM trial / Commercial ENUM services made available May 2005 ENUM enabled number range 780 finally added April 2006 Addendum to ENUM Agreement allowing Infrastructure ENUM in Austria Since then Desperately seeking ENUM users … Page    19.05.2009 .my ENUM Seminar – Kuala Lumpur
RTR‘s main focus in phase  5/6 Ensuring smooth transition into commercial phase Signing of contract with ENUM Tier 1 Registry regarding U-ENUM Monitoring policy framework requirements Setting track for Infrastructure ENUM Work on policy framework Signing of contract with ENUM Tier 1 Registry regarding I-ENUM Reducing regulatory involvement Phasing out of project-oriented work Establishing of monitoring processes … Allowing ENUM to stand on its own feet … Page    19.05.2009 .my ENUM Seminar – Kuala Lumpur
The Legal Framework (II) Contract between RTR and Tier 1 Registry (enum.at) Signed in August 2004 for a period until the end of 2007 (now ext. to 2009)  Policy framework for ENUM in Austria for 3.4.e164.arpa domain Basic technical, operational and administrative requirements Validation guidelines for Registrars E.g. defining error values depending on the number of delegations with several procedures occurring when this values are exceeded Addendum to the existing agreement between RTR and enum.at Signed in April 2006 allowing the commercial usage of Infrastructure ENUM Allowing communication service providers to enter numbers of their subscribers into a separate sub-domain and to add provider-relevant information (e.g. for routing or billing). Page    19.05.2009 .my ENUM Seminar – Kuala Lumpur
Regulatory Involvement over Time                   Phase Degree of regulatory involvement  Page    19.05.2009 .my ENUM Seminar – Kuala Lumpur Kick-start process U-ENUM Policy Framework I-ENUM Policy Framework ENUM Trial Platform
enum.at  - The official Austrian ENUM Registry Page    http://www.enum.at 19.05.2009 .my ENUM Seminar – Kuala Lumpur
IPcom  - One of 13 Austrian ENUM Registrars Page    http://www.my-enum.at/ 19.05.2009 .my ENUM Seminar – Kuala Lumpur
ENUM Delegations in Austria by Q1/2009 Page    19.05.2009 .my ENUM Seminar – Kuala Lumpur
Numbers in ENUM by 07.05.2009 Page    http://crawler.enum.at 19.05.2009 .my ENUM Seminar – Kuala Lumpur
Lessons learned 2 Page
User ENUM General Principle End-users should opt-in to ENUM with their existing phone numbers on the PSTN under the domain e164.arpa to provide other end-users with the capability to look up contact URIs on the Internet the above end-user wants to link to his number Weaknesses Most VoIP providers do not provide end-users with SIP URIs to be reached on the Public Internet (i.e. without generating termination income) Only the calling party benefits from an ENUM Record of the called party Chicken and egg problem (with number of ENUM delegations and ENUM services) and the statistics of Metcalfe’s Law 1 Country opt-in    regulators involvement slowing process down End-user opt-in    slowing process down further more General Scepticism of providers 1)  the value of a telecommunications network is proportional to the square of the number of users of the system (n 2 ) Page    19.05.2009 .my ENUM Seminar – Kuala Lumpur
User ENUM (cont’d) Weaknesses (cont’d) National level: High tariffs to ENUM-driven number range (+43 780)  International level ENUM-driven number ranges not routed from abroad at all “ Unknown” number range not implemented “ Suspect” number range not implemented High tariffs to “unknown” number range Page    19.05.2009 .my ENUM Seminar – Kuala Lumpur
Infrastructure ENUM General Principle Providers should opt-in to ENUM with the telephone numbers of their subscribers under a defined domain (e.g. i.3.4.e164.arpa for Austria) to provide other providers with details of their networks‘ ingress points. Weaknesses Provider Opt-In Country Opt-In (again) Single Tree What type of tree? Who is responsible? How to get all providers on that tree? How to deal with private ENUM deployments? Chicken and egg problem (with number of ENUM delegations and ENUM services) and the statistics of Metcalfe’s Law (again) Page    19.05.2009 .my ENUM Seminar – Kuala Lumpur
Private ENUM General Principle Providers opt-in to ENUM with the telephone numbers of their subscribers under a defined domain (e.g. e164.info) to provide fellow providers with details of their subscribers SIP AoRs. Also called Operator ENUM, Enterprise ENUM or Carrier ENUM Current service provider interconnect Private ENUM in a walled garden scenario SIP Exchange with restricted access on the Internet Public tree not in e164.arpa Weaknesses Limited reach No global solution How to peer with other federations? Page    19.05.2009 .my ENUM Seminar – Kuala Lumpur
Way forward 3 Page
General Benefits of ENUM remain (1/2) ENUM is using the DNS it’s there, it works, it’s global, it scales, it’s reliable, it’s open, anyone can use it…    Saving CAPEX Enables originating administrative domain to do an All Call Query (ACQ) to find destination network    Ultimate solution in Number Portability Provisioning is done only by the destination (recipient) administrative domain for the E.164 numbers this domain is hosting Saving OPEX Enables all multimedia (MM) services for E.164 numbers for all sessions on IP end-to-end Enables convergence (remember slide from 2001: ENUM – Key to Convergence?) Page    19.05.2009 .my ENUM Seminar – Kuala Lumpur
General Benefits of ENUM remain (2/2) The major benefits of Infrastructure ENUM for (VoIP) carriers and (VoIP) service providers is to save costs Minimal CAPEX for setting up the required infrastructure to provide the routing data Minimal OPEX for maintaining routing data Announce the E.164 numbers you host (in ENUM) Announce the domains you host (in DNS) Make bilateral or multilateral peering agreements Query ENUM and DNS to find any other destination provider Page    19.05.2009 .my ENUM Seminar – Kuala Lumpur
Final Considerations (1/2) ENUM already successfully used ... in Private ENUM deployments ( XConnect, e164.info, SPIDER, …) ENUM still strongly in the focus of standardisation IETF: WG ENUM, WG SPEERMINT, WG P2PSIP ETSI/3GPP: ENUM as a building block of the NGN control layer Future mobile service framework GSMA: strongly promoting Private ENUM to be used in their IPX framework Private domain e164enum.net Not connected to the public DNS Database possibly linking 2 billion mobile subscriber within the reach of GSMA Path Finder (GSMA number translation service) Page    19.05.2009 .my ENUM Seminar – Kuala Lumpur
Final Considerations (2/2) ENUM has left its infancy years Has been well supported, gained attention and  is deployed in a couple of places  ENUM now needs more industry support Standardisation bodies, operators and  service providers, service developers Technological innovation will do its part Migration to IP-based NGNs will further promote the ENUM case Industry solutions will emerge Page    19.05.2009 .my ENUM Seminar – Kuala Lumpur
Thank you. ! Kurt Reichinger Austrian Regulatory Authority for  Telecommunications and Broadcasting Mail: kurt.reichinger[at]rtr.at Fon: +43 1 58058 306 ENUM: 6.0.3.8.5.0.8.5.1.3.4.e164.arpa  Page
Backup - What is ENUM? 3 Page
What is ENUM? E lectronic  NU mber  M apping: “ … the mapping of Telephone Numbers to Uniform Resource Identifiers (URIs) using the Domain Name System (DNS) in the domain e164.arpa …” ENUM is an IETF standard (RFC 3761) finalized in April 2004 that allows users and applications to use a telephone number to access a listing of Internet resources (URI) for that number, such as addresses for IP telephony, e-mail or Web sites URIs are used to identify resources on the Internet (e.g. http://www.rtr.at ) Page    19.05.2009 .my ENUM Seminar – Kuala Lumpur
What is ENUM? Page    TEL: +43 1 58058 306 FAX: +43 1 58058 9306 MOB: +43 664 1234567 E-Mail: kurt.reichinger@rtr.at Web: www.rtr.at VoIP: 85573@fwd.pulver.com GATEWAY NUMBER TO URI MAPPING ENUM 19.05.2009 .my ENUM Seminar – Kuala Lumpur
ENUM is like an inquiry service Page    [email_address] [email_address] www.rtr.at +43 664 1234567 Kurt Reichinger | RTR | Tech. Dept. Who is  +43 1 58058 306 ? Can somebody help me ? [email_address] [email_address] www.rtr.at +43 664 1234567 Kurt Reichinger | RTR | Tech. Dept. I have some information ! 19.05.2009 .my ENUM Seminar – Kuala Lumpur
4 Call Scenarios Page    PSTN Internet +43 1 2083639 ENUM +43 1 58058 306 +43 1 58058 306 [email_address] [email_address] +43 1 2083639 +43 1 2083639 +43 1 2083639 19.05.2009 .my ENUM Seminar – Kuala Lumpur
ENUM Domain Name Page    +43 1 58058 306 43158058306 60385085134 6.0.3.8.5.0.8.5.1.3.4 6.0.3.8.5.0.8.5.1.3.4.e164.arpa   „ Fully qualified E.164 telephone number“   „ Fully qualified domain name“ As a result of an ENUM Lookup for this domain one gets back the IP-Address of the server where the data of the user of the corresponding telephone number are stored. Now this information can be retrieved 19.05.2009 .my ENUM Seminar – Kuala Lumpur
ENUM NAPTR RRs Page    [email_address] [email_address] www.rtr.at +43 664 1234567 Kurt Reichinger | RTR | Tech. Dept. ENUM Name Server $ORIGIN 7.1.4.8.5.0.8.5.1.3.4.e164.arpa.   IN NAPTR 10 10 “u” “E2U+ voice ”  “!ˆ^.*$!sip:85575@fwd.pulver.com!”. IN NAPTR 10 10 “u” “E2U+ email ”  “!ˆ^.*$!mailto:kurt.reichinger@rtr.at!”. IN NAPTR 10 20 “u” “E2U+ voice ”  “!ˆ^(.*$)$!tel:+436641234567!”. usw. NAMING AUTHORITY POINTER RESOURCE RECORD >> Agenda 19.05.2009 .my ENUM Seminar – Kuala Lumpur

ENUM in Austria

  • 1.
    ENUM in AustriaA story of high expectations and low usage figures Kurt Reichinger Austrian Regulatory Authority for Telecommunications and Broadcasting 19.05.2009 .my ENUM Seminar – Kuala Lumpur The opinions expressed in this presentation are the personal view of the author and do not prejudge decisions of the Austrian regulatory authorities.
  • 2.
    One of myslides from 2001 … 19.05.2009 .my ENUM Seminar – Kuala Lumpur Page
  • 3.
    … andUsage Figures from 2009 Page 19.05.2009 .my ENUM Seminar – Kuala Lumpur
  • 4.
    Agenda What isENUM? >> The Austrian ENUM Story Lessons Learned Way Forward Page 1 2 3 0
  • 5.
    The Austrian ENUMStory 1 Page
  • 6.
    Phases of theAustrian ENUM Story Page Warming  Forming  Storming  Norming  Performing  Mourning  19.05.2009 .my ENUM Seminar – Kuala Lumpur
  • 7.
    From  Warming to  Forming … August 2001 First public consultation conducted by RTR (i.e. the Austrian Regulatory Authority) February 2002 (User) ENUM Workshop organized by RTR Group of interested partners formed  Austrian ENUM Trial Platform May 2002 Delegation request by RTR to RIPE, ITU-TSB for 3.4.e164.arpa June 2002 3.4.e164.arpa delegated to RTR ENUM Tier 1 Registry in operation by NIC.AT (i.e. Austrian ccTLD Registry) September 2002 Austrian ENUM Trial Platform officially established Page 19.05.2009 .my ENUM Seminar – Kuala Lumpur
  • 8.
    RTR‘s main focusin phase 1/2 Acting as an enabler for innovative technology §1 Austrian Telecommunications Act mandates promotion of innovation Inform market players – discuss opportunities and threats White paper Public consultation(s) Public workshop Prepare landscape for first trials Providing platform for interested parties Clarify responsibilities regarding Austrian ENUM Domain File application for delegation of Austrian ENUM Domain Persuade the sceptics Page 19.05.2009 .my ENUM Seminar – Kuala Lumpur
  • 9.
    ENUM Tier 1Registry Responsibility for Numbering in Austria (+43)  RTR, i.e. the Regulatory Authority Responsibility for Austrian ENUM Domain (3.4.e164.arpa)  RTR Responsibility for ENUM Tier 1 Registry General  RTR Admin Contact  RTR Tech + Zone Contact  Outsourced to nic.at (later to found enum.at) ENUM trial framework between RTR-GmbH and trial partners Policy framework for ENUM trial in Austria Evaluating processes between registry and registrars Working on (re-)validation processes regarding the right to use number Page 19.05.2009 .my ENUM Seminar – Kuala Lumpur
  • 10.
    From  Storming to  Norming … September 2002 ENUM Tier 2 Name Server in operation by Telekom Austria November 2002 Policy Framework available Official start of Austrian ENUM trial First Live Demo in Atlanta, GA (Fall VON) December 2002 Ready to invite friendly ENUM subscribers and users October 2003 1st part of trial completed, 2nd phase (business customers) started December 2003 Large Scale ENUM and VoIP Pilot started at Vienna University (AT43) Page 19.05.2009 .my ENUM Seminar – Kuala Lumpur
  • 11.
    RTR‘s main focusin phase 3/4 Ensuring integrity of E.164 Numbering Space and related 3.4.e164.arpa ENUM Domain Space Compilation of transparent framework for usage of Austrian ENUM Domain Definition of requirements regarding identification and validation Ensuring adherence to the framework Enabling of maximum competition on ENUM Tier 2 level ENUM Registrar, ENUM Name Server Provider, ENUM Validation Entity ENUM Service Provider Consumer Protection Ensuring secrecy of telecommunications Preventing lock-in scenarios Ensuring end-customer opt-in Page 19.05.2009 .my ENUM Seminar – Kuala Lumpur
  • 12.
    The Legal Framework(I) New Austrian Telecommunications Law (TKG 2003) In force since August 20 th 2003 Based on the New European Legal Framework New Austrian Numbering Ordinance In force since May 12 th 2004, Amendment of October 18 th 2006 Taking ENUM into account +43 720 for national portable numbers and VoIP (semi-nomadic) +43 780 for VoIP and ENUM (nomadic) Definition of number ranges to be available for ENUM  see next slide Page 19.05.2009 .my ENUM Seminar – Kuala Lumpur
  • 13.
    Number Ranges madeavailable for ENUM Page 19.05.2009 .my ENUM Seminar – Kuala Lumpur Numbers for convergent services - (0)780 F Designated for the use with ENUM Gateway to the PSTN required Private networks - 05 C Numbers directly assigned to enduser Validation via assignment document Mobile numbers - (0)6 B Also pre-paid numbers are usable Validation by premium rate SMS Geographic numbers A (Used to be) Most common numbers Validation by postal mail and PIN Location independent fixed network numbers - (0)720 E Usable for VoIP Also possible as „Personal Numbers“ Toll free numbers - (0)800 D Commercially interesting numbers Validation via assignment document
  • 14.
    ENUM-driven Number Range(0)780 Number format: +43 780 abcdef (ghi) Prior delegation of ENUM domain required for assignment of number Registrar has to provide a Generic Gateway (for this number range) Cancellation of ENUM domain will (also) relinquish the number No validation problem as the domain delegation is necessary as the first step (domains delegated on a first come first served policy) Decoupling of number range allocation and gateway operator Any gateway may route the whole number range, just needs to be able to query ENUM  These gateways are called Generic Gateways (GG) Commercial delegation of domains starting May 2005 19.05.2009 .my ENUM Seminar – Kuala Lumpur
  • 15.
    The Generic GatewayPage Generic Gateway Calling Party A Called Party B Registration PSTN ENUMTier 1 ENUMTier 2 Internet 19.05.2009 .my ENUM Seminar – Kuala Lumpur
  • 16.
    And finally from  Performing to  M ourning … October 2003 Decision to start preparation for commercial deployment May 2004 New Numbering Ordinance defines ENUM-driven number range (780) August 2004 Contract signed with enum.at concerning a commercial phase November 2004 End of ENUM trial / Commercial ENUM services made available May 2005 ENUM enabled number range 780 finally added April 2006 Addendum to ENUM Agreement allowing Infrastructure ENUM in Austria Since then Desperately seeking ENUM users … Page 19.05.2009 .my ENUM Seminar – Kuala Lumpur
  • 17.
    RTR‘s main focusin phase 5/6 Ensuring smooth transition into commercial phase Signing of contract with ENUM Tier 1 Registry regarding U-ENUM Monitoring policy framework requirements Setting track for Infrastructure ENUM Work on policy framework Signing of contract with ENUM Tier 1 Registry regarding I-ENUM Reducing regulatory involvement Phasing out of project-oriented work Establishing of monitoring processes … Allowing ENUM to stand on its own feet … Page 19.05.2009 .my ENUM Seminar – Kuala Lumpur
  • 18.
    The Legal Framework(II) Contract between RTR and Tier 1 Registry (enum.at) Signed in August 2004 for a period until the end of 2007 (now ext. to 2009) Policy framework for ENUM in Austria for 3.4.e164.arpa domain Basic technical, operational and administrative requirements Validation guidelines for Registrars E.g. defining error values depending on the number of delegations with several procedures occurring when this values are exceeded Addendum to the existing agreement between RTR and enum.at Signed in April 2006 allowing the commercial usage of Infrastructure ENUM Allowing communication service providers to enter numbers of their subscribers into a separate sub-domain and to add provider-relevant information (e.g. for routing or billing). Page 19.05.2009 .my ENUM Seminar – Kuala Lumpur
  • 19.
    Regulatory Involvement overTime       Phase Degree of regulatory involvement Page 19.05.2009 .my ENUM Seminar – Kuala Lumpur Kick-start process U-ENUM Policy Framework I-ENUM Policy Framework ENUM Trial Platform
  • 20.
    enum.at -The official Austrian ENUM Registry Page http://www.enum.at 19.05.2009 .my ENUM Seminar – Kuala Lumpur
  • 21.
    IPcom -One of 13 Austrian ENUM Registrars Page http://www.my-enum.at/ 19.05.2009 .my ENUM Seminar – Kuala Lumpur
  • 22.
    ENUM Delegations inAustria by Q1/2009 Page 19.05.2009 .my ENUM Seminar – Kuala Lumpur
  • 23.
    Numbers in ENUMby 07.05.2009 Page http://crawler.enum.at 19.05.2009 .my ENUM Seminar – Kuala Lumpur
  • 24.
  • 25.
    User ENUM GeneralPrinciple End-users should opt-in to ENUM with their existing phone numbers on the PSTN under the domain e164.arpa to provide other end-users with the capability to look up contact URIs on the Internet the above end-user wants to link to his number Weaknesses Most VoIP providers do not provide end-users with SIP URIs to be reached on the Public Internet (i.e. without generating termination income) Only the calling party benefits from an ENUM Record of the called party Chicken and egg problem (with number of ENUM delegations and ENUM services) and the statistics of Metcalfe’s Law 1 Country opt-in  regulators involvement slowing process down End-user opt-in  slowing process down further more General Scepticism of providers 1) the value of a telecommunications network is proportional to the square of the number of users of the system (n 2 ) Page 19.05.2009 .my ENUM Seminar – Kuala Lumpur
  • 26.
    User ENUM (cont’d)Weaknesses (cont’d) National level: High tariffs to ENUM-driven number range (+43 780) International level ENUM-driven number ranges not routed from abroad at all “ Unknown” number range not implemented “ Suspect” number range not implemented High tariffs to “unknown” number range Page 19.05.2009 .my ENUM Seminar – Kuala Lumpur
  • 27.
    Infrastructure ENUM GeneralPrinciple Providers should opt-in to ENUM with the telephone numbers of their subscribers under a defined domain (e.g. i.3.4.e164.arpa for Austria) to provide other providers with details of their networks‘ ingress points. Weaknesses Provider Opt-In Country Opt-In (again) Single Tree What type of tree? Who is responsible? How to get all providers on that tree? How to deal with private ENUM deployments? Chicken and egg problem (with number of ENUM delegations and ENUM services) and the statistics of Metcalfe’s Law (again) Page 19.05.2009 .my ENUM Seminar – Kuala Lumpur
  • 28.
    Private ENUM GeneralPrinciple Providers opt-in to ENUM with the telephone numbers of their subscribers under a defined domain (e.g. e164.info) to provide fellow providers with details of their subscribers SIP AoRs. Also called Operator ENUM, Enterprise ENUM or Carrier ENUM Current service provider interconnect Private ENUM in a walled garden scenario SIP Exchange with restricted access on the Internet Public tree not in e164.arpa Weaknesses Limited reach No global solution How to peer with other federations? Page 19.05.2009 .my ENUM Seminar – Kuala Lumpur
  • 29.
  • 30.
    General Benefits ofENUM remain (1/2) ENUM is using the DNS it’s there, it works, it’s global, it scales, it’s reliable, it’s open, anyone can use it…  Saving CAPEX Enables originating administrative domain to do an All Call Query (ACQ) to find destination network  Ultimate solution in Number Portability Provisioning is done only by the destination (recipient) administrative domain for the E.164 numbers this domain is hosting Saving OPEX Enables all multimedia (MM) services for E.164 numbers for all sessions on IP end-to-end Enables convergence (remember slide from 2001: ENUM – Key to Convergence?) Page 19.05.2009 .my ENUM Seminar – Kuala Lumpur
  • 31.
    General Benefits ofENUM remain (2/2) The major benefits of Infrastructure ENUM for (VoIP) carriers and (VoIP) service providers is to save costs Minimal CAPEX for setting up the required infrastructure to provide the routing data Minimal OPEX for maintaining routing data Announce the E.164 numbers you host (in ENUM) Announce the domains you host (in DNS) Make bilateral or multilateral peering agreements Query ENUM and DNS to find any other destination provider Page 19.05.2009 .my ENUM Seminar – Kuala Lumpur
  • 32.
    Final Considerations (1/2)ENUM already successfully used ... in Private ENUM deployments ( XConnect, e164.info, SPIDER, …) ENUM still strongly in the focus of standardisation IETF: WG ENUM, WG SPEERMINT, WG P2PSIP ETSI/3GPP: ENUM as a building block of the NGN control layer Future mobile service framework GSMA: strongly promoting Private ENUM to be used in their IPX framework Private domain e164enum.net Not connected to the public DNS Database possibly linking 2 billion mobile subscriber within the reach of GSMA Path Finder (GSMA number translation service) Page 19.05.2009 .my ENUM Seminar – Kuala Lumpur
  • 33.
    Final Considerations (2/2)ENUM has left its infancy years Has been well supported, gained attention and is deployed in a couple of places ENUM now needs more industry support Standardisation bodies, operators and service providers, service developers Technological innovation will do its part Migration to IP-based NGNs will further promote the ENUM case Industry solutions will emerge Page 19.05.2009 .my ENUM Seminar – Kuala Lumpur
  • 34.
    Thank you. !Kurt Reichinger Austrian Regulatory Authority for Telecommunications and Broadcasting Mail: kurt.reichinger[at]rtr.at Fon: +43 1 58058 306 ENUM: 6.0.3.8.5.0.8.5.1.3.4.e164.arpa Page
  • 35.
    Backup - Whatis ENUM? 3 Page
  • 36.
    What is ENUM?E lectronic NU mber M apping: “ … the mapping of Telephone Numbers to Uniform Resource Identifiers (URIs) using the Domain Name System (DNS) in the domain e164.arpa …” ENUM is an IETF standard (RFC 3761) finalized in April 2004 that allows users and applications to use a telephone number to access a listing of Internet resources (URI) for that number, such as addresses for IP telephony, e-mail or Web sites URIs are used to identify resources on the Internet (e.g. http://www.rtr.at ) Page 19.05.2009 .my ENUM Seminar – Kuala Lumpur
  • 37.
    What is ENUM?Page TEL: +43 1 58058 306 FAX: +43 1 58058 9306 MOB: +43 664 1234567 E-Mail: kurt.reichinger@rtr.at Web: www.rtr.at VoIP: 85573@fwd.pulver.com GATEWAY NUMBER TO URI MAPPING ENUM 19.05.2009 .my ENUM Seminar – Kuala Lumpur
  • 38.
    ENUM is likean inquiry service Page [email_address] [email_address] www.rtr.at +43 664 1234567 Kurt Reichinger | RTR | Tech. Dept. Who is +43 1 58058 306 ? Can somebody help me ? [email_address] [email_address] www.rtr.at +43 664 1234567 Kurt Reichinger | RTR | Tech. Dept. I have some information ! 19.05.2009 .my ENUM Seminar – Kuala Lumpur
  • 39.
    4 Call ScenariosPage PSTN Internet +43 1 2083639 ENUM +43 1 58058 306 +43 1 58058 306 [email_address] [email_address] +43 1 2083639 +43 1 2083639 +43 1 2083639 19.05.2009 .my ENUM Seminar – Kuala Lumpur
  • 40.
    ENUM Domain NamePage +43 1 58058 306 43158058306 60385085134 6.0.3.8.5.0.8.5.1.3.4 6.0.3.8.5.0.8.5.1.3.4.e164.arpa  „ Fully qualified E.164 telephone number“  „ Fully qualified domain name“ As a result of an ENUM Lookup for this domain one gets back the IP-Address of the server where the data of the user of the corresponding telephone number are stored. Now this information can be retrieved 19.05.2009 .my ENUM Seminar – Kuala Lumpur
  • 41.
    ENUM NAPTR RRsPage [email_address] [email_address] www.rtr.at +43 664 1234567 Kurt Reichinger | RTR | Tech. Dept. ENUM Name Server $ORIGIN 7.1.4.8.5.0.8.5.1.3.4.e164.arpa.   IN NAPTR 10 10 “u” “E2U+ voice ” “!ˆ^.*$!sip:85575@fwd.pulver.com!”. IN NAPTR 10 10 “u” “E2U+ email ” “!ˆ^.*$!mailto:kurt.reichinger@rtr.at!”. IN NAPTR 10 20 “u” “E2U+ voice ” “!ˆ^(.*$)$!tel:+436641234567!”. usw. NAMING AUTHORITY POINTER RESOURCE RECORD >> Agenda 19.05.2009 .my ENUM Seminar – Kuala Lumpur

Editor's Notes

  • #2 <number><number>
  • #3 <number>
  • #4 <number>
  • #5 <number>
  • #6 <number>
  • #7 FormingIn the first stages of team building, the forming of the team takes place. The team meets and learns about the opportunity and challenges, and then agrees on goals and begins to tackle the tasks. Team members tend to behave quite independently. They may be motivated but are usually relatively uninformed of the issues and objectives of the team. Team members are usually on their best behavior but very focused on themselves. Mature team members begin to model appropriate behavior even at this early phase. Sharing the knowledge of the concept of \"Teams - Forming, Storming, Norming, Performing\" is extremely helpful to the team.Supervisors of the team tend to need to be directive during this phase.The forming stage of any team is important because in this stage the members of the team get to know one another and make new friends. This is also a good opportunity to see how each member of the team works as an individual and how they respond to pressure .[edit] StormingEvery group will then enter the storming stage in which different ideas compete for consideration. The team addresses issues such as what problems they are really supposed to solve, how they will function independently and together and what leadership model they will accept. Team members open up to each other and confront each other's ideas and perspectives.In some cases storming can be resolved quickly. In others, the team never leaves this stage. The maturity of some team members usually determines whether the team will ever move out of this stage. Some team members will focus on minutiae to evade real issues.The storming stage is necessary to the growth of the team. It can be contentious, unpleasant and even painful to members of the team who are averse to conflict. Tolerance of each team member and their differences needs to be emphasized. Without tolerance and patience the team will fail. This phase can become destructive to the team and will lower motivation if allowed to get out of control.Supervisors of the team during this phase may be more accessible but tend to still need to be directive in their guidance of decision-making and professional behavior.The groups will therefore resolve their differences and group members will be able to participate with one another more comfortably and they won't feel that they are being judged in any way and will therefore share their own opinions and views.[edit] NormingAt some point, the team may enter the norming stage. Team members adjust their behavior to each other as they develop work habits that make teamwork seem more natural and fluid. Team members often work through this stage by agreeing on rules, values, professional behavior, shared methods, working tools and even taboos. During this phase, team members begin to trust each other. Motivation increases as the team gets more acquainted with the project.Teams in this phase may lose their creativity if the norming behaviors become too strong and begin to stifle healthy dissent and the team begins to exhibit groupthink.Supervisors of the team during this phase tend to be participative more than in the earlier stages. The team members can be expected to take more responsibility for making decisions and for their professional behavior.[edit] PerformingSome teams will reach the performing stage. These high-performing teams are able to function as a unit as they find ways to get the job done smoothly and effectively without inappropriate conflict or the need for external supervision. Team members have become interdependent. By this time they are motivated and knowledgeable. The team members are now competent, autonomous and able to handle the decision-making process without supervision. Dissent is expected and allowed as long as it is channeled through means acceptable to the team.Supervisors of the team during this phase are almost always participative. The team will make most of the necessary decisions. Even the most high-performing teams will revert to earlier stages in certain circumstances. Many long-standing teams will go through these cycles many times as they react to changing circumstances. For example, a change in leadership may cause the team to revert to storming as the new people challenge the existing norms and dynamics of the team.<number>
  • #9 <number>
  • #10 <number>
  • #12 <number>
  • #13 13
  • #15 <number>
  • #16 <number>
  • #18 <number>
  • #24 <number>
  • #25 <number>
  • #26 <number>
  • #28 <number>
  • #29 <number>
  • #30 <number>
  • #31 <number>
  • #34 <number>
  • #35 <number>
  • #36 <number>
  • #37 <number>
  • #38 <number>
  • #39 <number>
  • #40 <number>
  • #41 <number>