EDUcause FL Presentation 051019
•
0 likes•135 views
This document discusses designing learning spaces that are flexible and accommodate changing needs. It emphasizes involving all stakeholders upfront to understand requirements and balance costs with desired features. Flexibility comes from adaptable building structures, mechanical and IT systems, and movable furniture. Resources for learning about cutting-edge design trends and examples include EDUCAUSE, Dartmouth University, and NC State University's SCALE-UP program. The panelists encourage sharing this content non-commercially provided the copyright is maintained.
More Related Content
Viewers also liked
Similar to EDUcause FL Presentation 051019
Similar to EDUcause FL Presentation 051019 (20)
EDUcause FL Presentation 051019
- 1. whenspacebecomesmorethanaplace . EDUCAUSE 19 October 05
- 2. panel MarkMaves, AIA sr. vicepresident, SmithGroup MartinSharpless, AIA senior manager, GilbaneBuildingCompany Copyright SmithGroup and Gilbane 2005. This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material to be shared for non-commercial, educational purposes, provided that this copyright statement appears on the reproduced materials and notice is given that the copying is by permission of the author. To disseminate otherwise or to republish requires written permission from the author.
- 4. place Rogets21st CenturyThesaurus: Concepts#435 .ASYLUM ..barrier ..dynasty . haunt .depository .depot
- 5. place becomes places expandingawarenessfromformal spaces: lecturehalls classrooms teachinglabs casestudyrooms seminar rooms
- 6. place becomes places to commons corridorsandlobbies cafés stairs grassandgrads lounges groupstudy
- 7. cuttingedge
- 8. cuttingedge toexpected goingquicklyfrom cuttingedge to stateof theart to stateof thestate
- 9. cuttingedge toexpected examples EmoryUniversity CoxHall ComputingCenter
- 13. cuttingedge toexpected ELI FocusSessions 2004 designof formal learningspaces(MIT) 2005 designof informal learningspaces(EstrellaMt.) 2006 designof virtual learningspaces (Uof Md)
- 14. cuttingedge toexpected new trendsfromELI (Sept. 05) byPhil Long(MIT) andMalcolmBrown(Dartmouth) intentional support for social learning strategies, informed by principles return to human centered design support of diverse, personally-owned devices to enrich academic learning
- 16. learners the net generation multi-tasked experienced learnbydoing collaborative digital portable connected fluid immediate
- 17. learning net genlearningpreferences peer-to-peer engagement & experience visual & kinesthetic things that matter
- 18. learners
- 19. transportation problems financial challenges work responsibilities job shift limited time health issues family responsibilities Diana Oblinger, ELI 05 Arizona (Bleed, 2005) learners lifeinterruptions
- 20. 0 20 50 10 30 Percentage 70 learners ( Dziuban, 2004) Mature 63% Boomer 55% Gen X 38% Net Gen 26% Students who were very satisfied with Web-based learning by generation Age vs. learning preferences 40 60
- 21. 90% Immediate Application 75% Practice by doing 50% Discussion Group 10% Reading 5% Lecture 20% Audiovisual 30% Demonstration 1 Average retention rates of learning activities. Source: National Training Laboratory, Bethel, ME learning
- 23. current opportunity Higher EducationSpending 2005$16.25Billion 65MillionSquareFeet 2006$17.25Billion 69MillionSquareFeet 2007$18.5Billion 74MillionSquareFeet 2008$18.5Billion 74MillionSquareFeet 2009$18Billion 72MillionSquareFeet 2010$17Billion 68MillionSquareFeet
- 24. current opportunity increasedexpendituresonbuildings increaseddonor interest increasedcompetitionfor students increasedcompetitionfor federal grants increasedrecognitionof collegesanduniversitiesas economicdrivers leadingtorecordexpenditureonconstruction -- opportunitytime!
- 25. involvedupfront
- 27. involvedupfront areaper person(standards/ typicals) # .lecture/ tablet arm 10-12nsf # .classroom/ table-chair 20-30nsf # .seminar 20-25nsf # .computer lab/classroom 30-40nsf
- 28. involvedupfront areaper person(contrast tostandards/ typicals) # .lecture/ tablet arm 10-12nsf # .classroom/ table-chair 20-30nsf # .seminar 20-25nsf # .computer lab/classroom 30-40nsf # .studio/multi-mediaclassroom 40-70nsf # .interactivelearningclassroom 45-100+nsf
- 29. involvedupfront what doesthefacilityrequire? classrooms can need 15 sf/person or 45 sf/person dependingonteachingrequirements $250 x 15 sf x600seats=$2.25million $250 x 45 sf x600seats=$6.75million flexibility=spaceanddollars whereisthebiggest impact (wanted/needed) and what can make do with less?
- 30. involvedupfront therealityof constructioncosts ResearchLabs=$350 500 per Square Foot Libraries = $280 350 per Square Foot RecreationCenters=$250 320 per Square Foot Student Housing=$160 230 per Square Foot BusinessSchools=$280 360 per Square Foot Liberal ArtsClassrooms=$220 300 per Square Foot $250/SquareFoot x100,000SquareFeet =$25Million!
- 33. involvedupfront prototyping/ labs iStanford teaming case study lecture Blecture A VECTA
- 34. involvedupfront budget andassumedsources in construction budget? in soft project costs? in departmental budget? inspecial programbudget/grant? incollege/universitybudget? in separate installation budget? $5 15per squarefoot
- 35. flexibility
- 36. flexibility
- 37. flexibility lifetimeof buildingcomponents Software systems Computer, Communications IT Hardware Cabling, Systems Furniture Systems Mechanical/ Electrical Systems Building Structures* * Effectively indefinite BuildingComponents Years 0 10 20 30 40 50
- 39. flexibility building meansof physical buildingflexibility flat slabs for floors floor to floor height lighting natural and mechanical/electrical systems IT infrastructure routes
- 40. flexibility building flat slab Tiers Slab Core Drilling
- 41. flexibility building floor height 1216 ACTIVITY Bottom of Slab Infrastructure / Structure Top of Slab Infrastructure / Structure
- 42. flexibility mechanical / electrical systems heat andcooling largegroupvs. small grouploadon space capacity flexibility vs. economy zonesfor capacityandvariableload power locationflexibilityvs. roomlayout options, capacity light dimmingcontrol, natural vs. artificial controls heating/lighting accesstoallowchangelater
- 43. flexibility ITinfrastructure/ AVsystems (inorder of priorityduringdesign) infrastructureroutes size capacity logical routing front? topand/ or bottomfed? teachingposition/ podium consistent controlsroomtoroomtominimizefaculty training
- 44. flexibility AV/ IT real-worldnsf per personratios floor-to-floor heightsbasedonimagesize real-worldbudgets
- 45. schematicdesign casestudy 40seat computer scienceclassroom SXGAresolution 11pt. font farthest viewer 30 3.5hscreenfactor 8.5hscreen 12 ceiling
- 46. schematicdesign casestudy 70seat computer scienceclassroom SXGAresolution 11pt. font farthest viewer 42 3.5hscreenfactor 12hscreen 12 ceiling, oops!
- 47. schematicdesign casestudy rotateroom90 degrees bringfarthest viewer closer pop-uptheceiling inthecenter maintainscreen sizetofarthest viewer ratio9-6 12-9 8-0 100°
- 52. resources
- 53. resources whotoinvolve developinggoals analyzingexistingfacilities projectingfutureneedsandlearningfromothers conductingarealitycheck exploringalternatives evaluatingandrecommending designingthefuture Educause Review July/ August 05, Wedge&Kearnsp32-38
- 55. resources SCALE-UP Student CenteredActivitiesFor LargeEnrollment UndergraduatePrograms http:/scaleup.programmedbydesign.com NorthCarolinaStateUniversity
- 58. panel MarkMaves, AIA sr. vicepresident, SmithGroup MartinSharpless, AIA senior manager, GilbaneBuildingCompany Copyright SmithGroup and Gilbane 2005. This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material to be shared for non-commercial, educational purposes, provided that this copyright statement appears on the reproduced materials and notice is given that the copying is by permission of the author. To disseminate otherwise or to republish requires written permission from the author.