EACH answer should be 300 words long,Quotation You may quote di.docx

•Download as DOCX, PDF•

0 likes•5 views

EACH answer should be 300 words long, Quotation: You may quote directly from primary sources, i.e. the readings we have used in class. This includes Shafer-Landau, Korsgaard, and Feldman. You must cite all quotations. Do not quote excessively in an attempt to up your word count; it will generally only weaken your answer! You may NOT use other sources (Wikipedia, SparkNotes, etc.). 1)One of Kant’s formulations of the categorical imperative is “Always act in such a way that you treat humanity, whether in yourself or another person, never merely as a means but always at the same time as an end.” What does it mean to treat human beings as ends rather than merely means? Why does Kant think human beings are ends in themselves? Do you agree with Kant that this is why we should treat persons ethically? Give reasons for your answer. 2) Onora O’Neill contrasts Kantian and Utilitarian Ethics with regard to their emphasis on justice vs. beneficence. Briefly say what O’Neill means by justice and beneficence (you may just give an example). Then discuss this contrast. What is the role of justice and beneficence in each theory? How are they different? 3) What are the behaviors that DeWaal thinks constitute chimpanzee justice? Do you think that the chimpazees’ behavior really is ethical/moral (as opposed to instinctual or accidental or something else)? Why or why not? Do you think this behavior entitles them to special ethical/moral treatment by humans? Why or why not? .

Education

EACH answer should be 300 words long,Quotation You may quote di.docx

Thought experiments in ethics can be used in a way that is analogous to how experiments in science are used. Many philosophers think that our ethical theories ought to be largely consistent with our considered judgments about morality. A considered judgment is a judgment about the moral rightness or wrongness of an action where the relevant information to make the judgment is available and the person making the judgment is in a position to do so dispassionately and without bias. We can test our moral theories by presenting specific moral cases to see if they entail or imply the same conclusion about the case as we get from our considered judgment about that case. Employ thought experiments to test the strength and weaknesses of Utilitarianism and Kant's deontology. Debate moral theory with your peers. Assignment Instructions Consider the 2 scenario's below. Write at least one paragraph (must be at least 200 hundred words each) on each scenario. Be sure your paragraph answers these three questions. 1. What would be the right thing to do according to Kant's deontological moral theory. 2. What would be the right thing to do according to Mill's Utilitarian theory. 3. What do you think is the right thing to do and why? (Initial post due Thursday). Follow up by commenting on at least two of your classmates posts (due by Sunday). Scenario 1 Imagine you own several houses in 1944 in the Netherlands. Anne Frank and her family are living in one of these and hiding from the Nazis. Suppose some Nazi SS officers ask you if anyone lives at the house where Anne Frank and her family living. You can lie and save them or tell the truth and doom them to death in a concentration camp. What would Kant say you should do and why? What would Mill say you should do and why? What WOULD you do and why? Scenario 2 A brilliant surgeon has five patients, each in need of a different organ, each of whom will die without that organ. Unfortunately, there are no organs available to perform any of these five transplant operations. A healthy you traveler, just passing through, comes in for a routine checkup. In the course of doing the checkup, the doctor discovers that his organs are compatible with all five of his dying patients. Should the doctor will the traveler to harvest his organs and saver the five people. What would Kant say you should do and why? What would Mill say you should do and why? What WOULD you do and why? ...

Answer each question with short answer (answers for every set of q.docx

justine1simpson78276

Answer each question with short answer (answers for every set of question located in the link) Alexander Chapter 6 https://peacelawandjustice.files.wordpress.com/2013/12/newjimcrow-ch-1.pdf · Describe the experience of the Jena 6: who, what, when, where. How was the case eventually adjudicated? · By and large, what has been the attitude of the civil rights community on the War on Drugs? · What one area of criminal justice has most been the focus of civil rights lawyers? · Why was Rosa Parks chosen to be the symbol of courage by not giving up her seat on the bus? · Who were Claudette Colvin and Mary Louise Smith? Why were they not chosen to represent the bus boycotters? · Why does Alexander include these examples (Parks, Colvin, Smith) in her discussion of criminal advocacy? · Do poverty and unemployment statistics include people behind bars? · On what basis does Bruce Western argue that it is “pure fiction” that the Clinton years were good for African Americans? · What is the Corrections Corporation of America? · Besides for-profit prisons, name at least three “prison profiteers.” · Does mass incarceration contribute substantially to lower crime rates? · What did California’s Proposition 36 mandate? · What is colorblindness and why is it problematic as an approach to the War on Drugs? · What is California’s Proposition 54 (endnote #34). Did it pass or fail? · Why does the author consider affirmative action as a “racial bribe”? · What are the four threats to the declining circumstances of white men in the U.S.? Hint: one is NOT affirmative action. · Does the presence of people of color as workers in the criminal justice make a difference in light of all the problems discussed in the book? Why or why not? · Has President Obama’s administration made things worse or better? How does Alexander support this answer? · Who said, “Look, you know, when I was a kid, I inhaled. Frequently. That was the point”? · Which writer said to his nephew, “this is your home…do not be driven from it. …we can make America what it must become”? Letter from a Birmingham Jail http://www.africa.upenn.edu/Articles_Gen/Letter_Birmingham.html · Who is the author · To whom was the letter directed? · What did St. Augustine say about an unjust law? · Who was Albert Boutwell? Bull Connor? · Which U.S. Constitutional Amendment guarantees peaceful assembly? Antiracist Activism https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Antiracist_Activism_for_Teachers_and_Students/White_Activists/Activists · What is the name of Beverly Tatum’s 1997 book? · What is Tatum’s definition of “antiracist activism” using the metaphor of the conveyor belt? · Is there such a thing as passive antiracism? Why or why not? · Describe who each of these antiracist activists are and what they did to end racism. · Margaret Burnham · Terry Davis · Dr. Martin Nathan · Dr. James Cameron · Dr. Beverly Tatum · Timothy Jacob Wise Writing Assignment Guidelines: Love, life, and family. The prompt for the third w.

End of Term Paper The paper requires you to reflect on a problem an.docx

christinemaritza

End of Term Paper: The paper requires you to reflect on a problem and to explain how some contrasting philosophical positions relate to it. The paper also requires you to take a critical stance. A paper assignment will be posted on Canvas well before the paper's due date. This paper is of moderate length (1,800 - 2,000 words). (Choose one of the prompts below.) Prompt 1: The problem: The relationship between the mind and the body The opposing philosophical positions: Cartesian Dualism and Physicalism (Use both Ryle and Putnam) - You will 1) Summarize both positions, 2) Explain the arguments for and against each opposing position (why does their position do a better job explaining the mind. You may use Nagel’s arguments in this part), 3) Offer your own assessment of the dialectic using your own examples and reasoning; which side you think offers a more plausible model of the mind and why? Prompt 2: The problem: What makes our actions moral? The opposing philosophical positions: Utilitarianism (use Bentham) and Kantianism. - You will 1) Summarize both positions, 2) explain how and when each position differs from one another with respect to their judgments of the moral worth of actions. Describe examples where they come to different conclusions. 3) Offer your own assessment of the dialectic by discussing which theory offers more or less plausible grounds for justifying our actions. You may end up siding with one over the other, agreeing with both, or disagreeing with both. Make sure to focus on the reasons why you came to this conclusion. Prompt 3: The problem: What aspects of our identity are fundamental to understanding what makes us a rational person? The (potentially) opposing philosophical positions: The Kantian account of personhood and the situated personhood of social epistemology. - You will 1) Summarize Kant’s account of what it is to be a person. Then, explain the importance of aspects of our situated identity in Mills’ and Fricker’s accounts of ignorance and responsibly listening to testimony. Offer your own assessment of each point of view and argue whether, with respect to understanding what we need to do in order to be rationality, these points of view are more likely to be incompatible or compatible. Make sure to focus on the reasons why you came to this conclusion .

Abortion 1. What according to Warren are the 5 conditions .docx

daniahendric

Abortion 1. What according to Warren are the 5 conditions for personhood? Why is it relevant to the abortion debate? 2. What is a necessary/sufficient condition? Give examples. What does it have to do with the abortion debate? 3. What is the traditional argument against abortion? Is it valid? 4. Why is the notion of personhood important to the argument against abortion? 5. Explain why a fetus, according to Warren, does not have a right to life. 6. What is the space explorer analogy and what is it supposed to show? 7. What is (are) an (the) objection(s) to Warren’s argument against banning abortion? Are there any objections against it? Does she have any replies to those objection(s)? Are her replies any good? Explain why or why not. 8. What part of the traditional argument for the banning of abortion does Thompson attempt to undermine? (How does she go about doing so?) 9. What is the violinist example in the Thompson article? What is it meant to show? 10. What is Marquis’ thesis about? Why does he think killing of innocents is wrong? 11. What argument does Marquis’ propose instead of the traditional personhood argument? 12. What are the implications of Marquis’ argument against abortion? 13. What are the various answer that Marquis considers to the question of why killing is wrong? Which is the answer that he favors? 14. What is the discontinuation account of wrongful killing? How does it relate to Marquis’s argument? Animal Ethics 15. What is “Speciesism”? Why is it wrong according to Singer? What are reasons for thinking this is a kind of unjust discrimination? 16. Explain why Singer thinks it is impossible to justify the principle of equality among humans on the basis of an actual, factual equality between humans. 17. Where should we draw the line between the beings who are worth of moral consideration, and the ones who are not, according to Singer? 18. On which notion of right does Machan base his claim that animals do not have rights? How does it relate to his argument about animal rights? 19. What is the fundamental difference between animals and humans according to Machan? How does it relate to his argument about animal rights? 20. What are four ways of responding to the Norcross’s “causal argument”? Explain them. 21. State and explain Singer's response to the following objection: Animals and humans can't be morally equal because they are factually very different from each other. 22. State and explain Singer's response to the following objection: Humans and animals should not get equal treatment since this would involve absurdities like giving animals the right to vote and providing them with a high school education. 23. What is the difference between a consequentialist moral theory like utilitarianism and a rights view like Machan’s? Which factors do they consider when determining if an action is right/wrong? What is Machan’s criterion of moral sta ...

Plagiarism unizulu

siphiweashwell

This document provides information about plagiarism, including definitions, examples, and guidelines for proper citation. It defines plagiarism as stealing another's work and ideas and passing them off as one's own. This can be done intentionally by copying work verbatim or unintentionally by poorly paraphrasing or citing sources. The document emphasizes the importance of citing sources through practices such as quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing in order to avoid plagiarism. It also outlines the proper ways to cite sources in-text and in reference lists to give credit to original authors.

Follow-Up Post Peer ResponsePlease write a minimum of five c.docx

keugene1

Follow-Up Post Peer Response Please write a minimum of five complete sentences for your one peer posting. You should also consider referencing some information from the course textbook , lecture lessons , or a scholarly source to help support your written response post. Writing Requirements Minimum of 2 sources cited (assigned readings/online lessons and an outside scholarly source) APA format for in-text citations and list of references Youtube Video: PHILOSOPHY: Immanuel Kant Please find information related to Immanuel Kant below. Immanuel Kant was born in what is known today as Kaliningrad, Russia. He was known for publishing sixty-nine philosophical publications. Kant was not only a philosopher and teacher; he was also a chair in the field of mathematics. He was a believer in morals and doing what was right. This philosopher was also known for having multiple diseases over the course of his life (Fellin & Ble, 1997). During the course of his life, Immanuel Kant wrote about human socialization and how antagonism can impact humans and society. For instance, Immanuel Kant blames “man’s own absurd natural predispositions” for his own problems (Valdez, 2017, p. 827). Some of these problems consisted of barbaric behavior as well as war. This was difficult for Kant. As a moral philosopher, Immanuel Kant believed in doing the right thing. Similarly, Kant believed in peacebuilding. Thus, building trust was a great way to maintain peace (Yu, 1998). Kant also believed that there were times when individuals were confident in their ability to be among others in society. He also believed that there were times when individuals felt isolated from the same society that they often enjoyed engagement. Moreover, Kant believed that autonomy was a necessary part of human nature (Pirc, 2018). Like, Aristotle, Immanuel Kant believed in respect and dignity for human life. This connectedness stemmed from a common thread that Kant labeled as the formula for humanity. This philosopher furthered believed in two distinct domains as it related to the categorical imperative. One of these was the doctrine of right. The other distinct domain was referred to as the doctrine of virtue (DiCenso, 2019). Kant’s categorical imperative was one method of illuminating this message. In other words, people mattered. According to Ruggiero (2012), they should never be used as a means to someone else’s end. “To treat people “as an end” means, on the most superficial level, treating them well. We must promote their welfare, respect their rights, avoid harming them, and generally “endeavor, so far as we can, to further the ends of others” (Rachels & Rachels, 2019, p. 147). Needless to say, cruelty and evil exists but Kant believed that it was important for people to act morally. At times; however, Kant viewed human beings as animals. Kant argued, “that if we develop a habit of treating animals cruelly this will damage our character and ultimately lead to in.

An Argument Essay

Papers Writing Service

What Makes An Effective Argument Ineffective? Argument From Analogy Essay Everythings An Argument Ethos Pathos Logos What Is An Argumentative Passage Analysis Everything Is An Argument Argumentative Essay On Artificial Intelligence What Makes A Successful Argument? Argumentative Essay On Social Justice Writing An Argumentative Essay Writing An Argument Analysis Fallacies To An Argument Example Of An Argument Analysis Argumentative Essay On Veganism Argumentative Essay On The Holocaust Othello : An Argumentative Essay Argumentative Essay On Organ Donation Argumentative Essay : Argumentative Writing How to Write an Argument Essay

Is there a universal purpose in human Is there a.docx

write4

The document outlines an assignment to write three argumentative essays on philosophical topics. Students are instructed to choose three of ten central philosophical questions provided and for each: 1) Take a pro position and argue for it, addressing two objections; 2) Take a con position and argue for it, addressing two objections; and 3) Critically analyze and evaluate the arguments for both sides and determine which has the better argument. Students are provided guidelines on formatting, citing sources, and structure for each essay section.

The document provides instructions for students to write a letter to the editor from the perspective of a character in their chosen novel. It outlines the task, gives examples of issues the letter could address, and provides guidance on the structure and content of the letter, including how to write an effective opening statement, arguments, and conclusion. Students are also given tips on using personal pronouns and emotive language in the letter and reminded of the submission deadline and process.

Directions Choose one (1) prompt from each of the four (4) sect.docx

mariona83

Directions: Choose one (1) prompt from each of the four (4) sections below and write a 175-350 word (1/2 page to 1 page) response. All responses should be typed, double-spaced and submitted electronically to Blackboard by the assigned due date. Please use this document to record your responses. Genesis and The Enuma Elish (50 pts.) 1. Creation myths often make claims about the workings of the natural world. Discuss 3 of these claims as found in Enuma Elish and/or Genesis. What, if anything, do these claims suggest about the culture that produced them and their understanding of the natural world? 2. Secular scholars suggest that Genesis 1 (written around 600 BCE) is most likely a retelling of the older Enuma Elish (written around 2000 BCE). What commonalities between the two do you see? Are they enough to warrant this conclusion? Why? Why not? 3. Identify and discuss 3 differences between Genesis 1 and Genesis 2. Are these differences enough to justify the position that these stories come from different traditions and different authors? Why or why not? 4. Many ancient cultures imagined life as formed in the clay and then quickened by the gods through their blood, their breath, or other means. Discuss the motif of the golem and the fragmenting of the deity. How do they play into the idea of “the god within?” Reference at least 2 works in your response. Objective Points Comments Response directly addresses prompt. /10 Response cites directly (uses quotations) from source material. /10 Response indicates a thorough understanding of source material (student has strong grasp of details and demonstrates an understanding of the culture). /10 Response indicates the student has thought critically about the source material (draws conclusions, makes inferences, evaluates, makes connections). /10 Response is well written, free of grammatical error, and meets the length requirement. /10 The Epic of Gilgamesh (50 points) 1. Discuss the conflict between the civilized man and the savage as revealed in the Epic of Gilgamesh. What are the characteristics of the civilized man? How does this compare to the savage? 2. Discuss Gilgamesh’s battle with Humbaba. In the battle, what does Gilgamesh represent? What does Humbaba represent? What does the conflict reveal about the Babylonian view of man’s relationship with nature? 3. Discuss the theme of immortality in Epic of Gilgamesh. Does King Gilgamesh eventually attain immortality? How? What is the significance of this? 4. The Epic of Gilgamesh offers its own commentary on what is valuable in life. What is this commentary? Consider the tavern keeper’s advice to King Gilgamesh, the flood narrative, and Gilgamesh’s revelations at the end of the epic. 5. One of the primary themes in The Epic of Gilgamesh is Cooperation vs. Competition. Explore this theme in the work. What is being taught about the nature of competition and cooperation? 6. Compare and/or contrast the conflict of city vs. c.

Literary AnalysisExplanation and BackgroundLiterary anal.docx

SHIVA101531

Literary Analysis Explanation and Background Literary analysis: The Island of Doctor Moreau Rough draft due: October 2nd at the start of class Final draft due: October 7th at the start of class requirements 1,800 – 2,400 words (approx. 6-8 pgs.) + Works Cited Page Pose an original interpretation of The Island of Doctor Moreau. Reference one of the historical or critical readings from the Broadview editions (these are what we read on Sept. 18). prompt So what? This is the question that we always ask in relation to literature. A conversation that you may have with an English instructor might go as follows: Hetty was so tragic. So what? I mean, she had no one to turn to. So what? She was like, abandoned by her society for her affair with Arthur, but he wasn’t even punished. So what? It’s a real double-standard, you know. Hetty is punished for her desire. Now you’re getting somewhere. A literary analysis should offer your analysis of a text’s relevance to greater culture. What is this text saying about one’s experience of the world around us? This is what you’ll seek to answer. To support your interpretation, you will draw on the language of the text, meaning direct quotations (you will need a minimum of one quotation per paragraph). Examples You will have access to examples on Blackboard, so I recommend you look there. However, you might also review the chapter “Strategic Reading.” The authors illustrate what aspects of a text you might analyze and how to form an argument. Consider their reading of animals in Frederick Douglass narrative. They do NOT just say, “Frederick Douglas uses animals to represent the slave holders.” This is the type of statement to which you might reply, “So what?” It doesn’t tell you anything significant about the novel. Rather than make a general (and unexciting) statement like this, they argue, “Frederick Douglas uses animal imagery to represent the character of the slave holders, inverting the traditional association of animals with slaves to suggest that the slave holders are the true uncivilized monsters.” Which statement is better? Which one tells you more? Which one can you argue with? If Douglas refers to the slave holders as animals, you can’t argue with that, but you might argue that, rather than suggesting that the slave holders are monsters, Douglas inverts the traditional trope to suggest that the slave holders are not that different from the slaves from whom they want to distinguish themselves. Your job is to do this with The Island of Doctor Moreau. Pick an attribute of the story or text that you found particularly interesting and explain it in your literary analysis. Learning objectives At the end of this assignment you should have demonstrated your ability to do the following: Analyze the language of a text. Incorporate terms that illustrate your familiarity with the genre of writing. Reference and analyze the language of the text to support your analysis. Write a clear thesis statement. Pro ...

or Singer.docx

stirlingvwriters

The document provides instructions for a 5-page essay examining an issue from the perspectives of three ethical approaches: 1) a utilitarian thinker like Bentham, Mill, or Singer who focuses on maximizing welfare, 2) a deontologist like Kant, Nozick, Locke or Rawls who emphasizes respecting freedom and rights, and 3) a virtue ethicist like Aristotle who focuses on cultivating virtue and promoting the good life. For each perspective, students should explore arguments for both sides of the issue and identify an objection. The essay should have a clear thesis arguing one approach is superior and why.

First_Day_of_Class_International_Relatio

Dr. Robert L Silva II MA

This course introduces students to the field of international relations through its major components, theories, and analytical methods. Students will learn to use empirical evidence to support arguments about international relations concepts. The course will teach basic thinking techniques including ontology, phenomenology, epistemology, and phrenology to categorize and explain situations and behavior. Students will complete 10 news article analyses applying these analytical methods and a midterm and final exam testing their understanding of key definitions and ability to analyze situations. Class attendance, article analyses, and exams will determine grades, with opportunities to improve grades through optional papers.

COGNITIVE DISSONANCE THEORY .docx

monicafrancis71118

COGNITIVE DISSONANCE THEORY 3 Adams, J. S., Berkowitz, L. & Hatfield, E. (1976). Equity theory: Towards the general theory of social interaction. New York: Academic Press. The three authors of this book consider the theory of cognitive dissonance as, one that proposes that individuals should have motivational drive that reduces dissonance by way of altering the existing forms of cognitions. They also propose that the drive should also form new consistent belief systems, or even reduce the significance of any single element of dissonance. They consider the theory as one based on the proposition that if a person has two forms of cognitions which may be inconsistent with one another, he or she will experience some pressure of a motivational state referred to as cognitive dissonance. They argue that if a person has two forms of cognitions which may be inconsistent with one another, he or she will experience some pressure of a motivational state referred to as cognitive dissonance. This pressure seeks to alter either of the dissonant cognition. This book acts a source that identifies the major propositions within which the theory lies. Akerlof, G. A., & Dickens, W. T. (1982). Economic consequences of cognitive Dissonance. American economic review,72(3): 307–319. In this book, Akerlof and Dickens came up with an economic model of the phenomenon of cognitive dissonance. The two explain the phenomenon of cognitive dissonance using three simplified propositions. The first one they consider is the development of preferences of the actual state in addition to the traditional assumption over the actual state of the world; they also tend to have preferences over their own beliefs of the actual state of the world. They give an example of people believing that they are smart and compassionate. The other proposition is that people can only control their beliefs partially. They tend to belief what they choose to, if given some information. They also always chose the information to listen to. According to the authors, people prefer to think themselves as smarter, and they always tend to ignore any information that may suggest they made a wrong decision. The last proposition is that, once a particular person tends to choose his beliefs, they always persist over time. Cooper, J. (2007). Cognitive dissonance: Fifty years of a classic theory. Los Angeles: SAGE Publ. In his book, Cooper identifies cognitive dissonance as one of the most influential form of theories in the field of social psychology. He considers its oldest realization as the choice induced sort of dissonance. He claims that people always tend to rationalize past choices by way of devaluing the rejected alternatives and instead upgrading the embraced ones. He refers to this process as preference spreading. He demonstrates that every study he tested suffered from a fundamental form of methodological flaw. His analysis.

Determinism.docx

bkbk37

According to the principle of determinism, every event has a cause that makes it inevitable. This includes human thoughts and actions. The passage uses the example of formulating a thesis and writing an essay to illustrate this point. It argues that if determinism is true, the thoughts one is having now and the quality of the upcoming essay are the unavoidable results of one's genetics, upbringing, brain state, and the current situation, determined since birth. This raises questions about whether people deserve praise or blame for their actions if they are inevitable. The essay question asks which theory - libertarianism, hard determinism, or compatibilism - best explains the relationship between moral responsibility, freedom, and determinism.

1000+ word essay MLA styleTopic Judging others is human nature..docx

AlyciaGold776

1000+ word essay MLA style Topic : Judging others is human nature. Some of us may practice fighting the urge to be judgmental more than others, but it is a very active battle. What lessons can you argue the characters from “ A Good Man Is Hard To Find by Flannery Oconnor” and “Young Goodman Brown by Nathaniel Hawthorne” teach readers regarding the dangers of being judgmental? Please use these strategy questions as the professor is looking for them to be addressed in the writing. Do you have a lead-in to “hook” your reader? (an example, anecdote, scenario, startling statistic, or provocative question.) How much background is required to properly acquaint readers with your issue? Will your claim be placed early (introduction) or delayed (conclusion) in your paper? What is your supporting evidence? Have you located authoritative (expert) sources that add credibility to your argument? Have you considered addressing opposing viewpoints? Are you willing to make some concessions (compromises) toward opposing sides? What type of tone (serious, comical, sarcastic, inquisitive) best relates your message to reach your audience? One written, have you maintained a third person voice? (no “I” or “you” statements) How will you conclude in a meaningful way? (call your readers to take action, explain why the topic has a global importance, or offer a common ground compromise that benefits all sides?) I wanted to make the instructions clear so I am not penalized when it comes to grading. All paragraphs should have a topic sentence and supporting sentences explaining one idea and not multiple ideas. Things I got hit on, on past papers on here. Intro Opposition Supporting argument Conclusion Works cited page looking for an A+ also have a 2000 word research paper coming up soon that i'm willinng to pay good for will be posting soon .

Introduction to Logic Lecture Notes.pptx

qaalluudha

NameBIB 107DateInstructor Covenant Paper Student Gui.docx

rosemarybdodson23141

Name BIB 107 Date Instructor Covenant Paper Student Guide Part 1 – Covenant and Scripture Analysis Instructions Use this template to complete the Topic 1 Term Paper Part 1 assignment. In this assignment, you will answer questions about passages in each of the NT categories. · The Gospels · Acts · Paul’s Epistles · The General Epistles · Revelation Type directly onto this template, and submit it for your assignment. Do not put quotes of the scripture passages in your answers to the questions. Instead, summarize and analyze the passages about each of the covenants. Your answers to the questions should come from your reading of and reflection on the biblical texts. The Gospels Use a concordance, Bible website (e.g., biblegateway.com), or Bible software program to search for occurrences of the word covenant or related words in the Gospels. Related words where the covenants are implied without using the term may include words such as the law, Moses, Abraham, Noah, promise, and so on. 1. From your search, what are the three most significant passages in the Gospels related to the theme of covenant? Answer each question below, typing the answer to each question directly beneath each question. The answers to all three questions must be 150-200 words combined. 2. What do these passages tell you about God’s relationship with people through covenants? Which covenants are operative? 3. What are the Gospels teaching about the covenants? Do these teachings explain the relationship between the covenants? 4. What do the Gospels teach about the New Covenant? Acts Use a concordance, Bible website (e.g., biblegateway.com), or Bible software program to search for occurrences of the word covenant or related words in Acts. Related words where the covenants are implied without using the term may include words such as the law, Moses, Abraham, Gentile, circumcision, and so on. 1. From your search, what are the three most significant passages in Acts related to the theme of covenant? Answer each question below, typing the answer to each question directly beneath each question. The answers to all three questions must be 150-200 words combined. 2. What do these passages tell you about God’s relationship with people through covenants? Which covenants are operative? 3. What is Acts teaching about the nature of the covenants? Do these teachings explain the relationship between the covenants? 4. What does Acts have to say about the Gentiles’ relationship to the covenants? Paul’s Epistles Use a concordance, Bible website (e.g., biblegateway.com), or Bible software program to search for occurrences of the word covenant or related words in Paul’s epistles. Related words where the covenants are implied without using the term may include words such as the law, Moses, Abraham, Gentile, circumcision, and so on. 1. From your search, what are the three most significant passages in Paul related to the theme of covenant? Answer each question below, typing .

scientific writing-slides recc.ppt

ima fitria

This document provides an overview of key principles for effective scientific writing from a course titled "Scientific Writing." It discusses several important aspects of what makes good writing, including communicating ideas clearly and elegantly. It emphasizes reducing unnecessary words, cutting extraneous content, and being specific rather than vague. The document also includes examples of wordy and unclear sentences improved by applying these principles of concise, clear scientific writing.

Logic & critical thinking

AMIR HASSAN

This document provides an introduction to logic and critical thinking. It defines logic as the study of correct reasoning and fallacies as incorrect arguments. It discusses the history of logic according to various philosophers like Aristotle. It also defines key logical terms like quality, quantity, and immediate inference. Immediate inferences include conversion, obversion, and contraposition. The document provides examples of each. It also discusses different types of fallacies including fallacies of relevance, presumption, and ambiguity. Fallacies of relevance aim to appear relevant but are not, such as appeals to emotion.

EC202 Fall 2016Homework 1(due Oct 12)Name_________.docx

EACH answer should be 300 words long,Quotation You may quote di.docx

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Similar to EACH answer should be 300 words long,Quotation You may quote di.docx

Similar to EACH answer should be 300 words long,Quotation You may quote di.docx (14)

More from hasselldelisa

More from hasselldelisa (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

EACH answer should be 300 words long,Quotation You may quote di.docx