This general order from a U.S. District Court addresses common issues and deficiencies with discovery objections. It instructs parties to avoid vague, nonspecific objections and to explain how requests are overly broad or burdensome. If the scope is disputed, responsive information within the agreed scope should still be provided. Objections must specifically explain why information sought would not lead to admissible evidence. Formulaic objections followed by an answer are insufficient, as are generalized privilege objections without a proper privilege log.