Data-driven
teacher effectiveness
Chancesabout how
you’re already thinking
                        are
to improve teacher effectiveness.
S 763:
S ecuring Teacher Effectiveness,
L eaders, L earning A nd R esults Act
S 763:

STELLAR ACT
Where to
begin
You could
invest
6 figures—even 7 figures—on
more testing...
... but what if you could
drive school change…
...using the assessment data
you already have today
Growth
Modeling
Our approach:
Compare & analyze ANY test data.
Your result:
NO extra testing.
NO extra cost.
Example:
Language ITBS Growth vs. Achievement
(anonymous school)
Low performance/high growth                         High performance/high growth
                                               100
                                                                                                                                             20
                                                                                                                                    5
                                                                                                                                                  15
                                                                                                                         16
Student Growth Percentile



                                                                                                        1                           8       23
                                               75




                                                                                                                              6
                                                                                                                        4                              9
                            (2007-2009 ITBS)




                                                         11                                                                             3

                                                                                                                        25
                                               50




                                                                22                                                                 19
                                                                                          12
                                                                                                                                                  7
                                                                2                                            14
                                               25




                                                                                                                   13
                                                                                     24
                                                                21                                           10         18
                                                                              17

                                                              Low performance/low growth                          High performance/low growth
                                                     0                   25                        50                         75                           100

                                                                                   National Percentile Rank
                                                                                               (2009 ITBS)
Student Names
1          14
2           15
3          16
4           17
5          18
6          19
7          20
8           21
9          22
10         23
11         24
12         25
13
Example:
Math ITBS Growth vs. Achievement
(district-wide)
Low performance/high growth        High performance/high growth
                                         100
                                         75
Median District SGP
                      (2007-2009 ITBS)
                                         50
                                         25




                                                                                                             Less than 100

                                                                                                             100-149

                                                                                                             150-199


                                                   Low performance/low growth         High performance/low growth 299
                                                                                                              200 -

                                                                                                             300 or more
                                               0              25                 50               75                         100

                                                                     Median 2009 ITBS NPR
Inquiry
Outliers?
What’s going on?
Why?
What are our
best practices
and how do we
share them
What NCLB did for
principal accountability,
GROWTH MODELING does for
teacher accountability.
Data-driven
teacher effectiveness
Data-driven
teacher effectiveness
Now that I’ve identified
the issues...
...how do I support
the process
Replicate my
exceptionally good
teachers.
Replicate my
exceptionally good
teachers.
Support my
struggling learners.
Support my
struggling learners.
Growth
Modeling

Data-driven teacher effectiveness: Where to begin?