2. Background
•Wholesale shoe business
• Established in1991 in West grove, P.A.
•One design
• Closed back, stapled constructed leather clog
•Growth
• Started as small start up
• Now over 100 employees and $90M in revenues
3. Issues Facing Dansko
•Foreign exchange risk
• $ value is decling relative to €
•Outsourcing to Asian manufacturers
• To offset increased production costs & increase
capacity
•Lacking industry expertise
• Required to sustain growth
4. U.S. Footwear Market 2000-2004
•Compound annual growth rate of 2.7%
•Annual sales reached $2.3B in 2004
•Forecasted value projected at $60B by 2009
U.S Footwear Industry
$52B in Sales
Brown Shoes 47%
(Leather,Office,and Casual)
White Shoes 30%
(Athletic Footwear)
Other 23%
U.S. Comfort Wear
(Style & Comfort)
Euro Comfort
(Durability & Orthopedic)
5. Financial Analysis
• operating margins = 50%-60%
• profit margins of =17%
• D/E ratio = 0
6. Competitors
• Ecco
•operating margin of 7.9%
• D/E of 1.79
• profit margin 4.4%
•increased marketing spending by 22%
• Brown Shoe Company
•operating margin 3.33%
•profit margin of 2.56%
• D/E of 1.03
• Both firms have some international exposure and are
diversified against the change in consumer tastes
8. Strategy
•Differentiation
• US company with European style
• 9 different product lines
• Mom & Pop culture
• All decisions go through CEO Calbot
• “Home-schooling method”
• Informal mentoring
• Affects growth
9. Aspects of the firm related to performance
•Organizational
• Affected by lack of knowledge about the industry
•Culture
•Everyone is like family
•Educational opportunities
•People & Top Leaders
•Cabot insists on having much of the control
10. Issues Going Forward
•Skyrocketing manufacturing costs
• Manufacturing mostly in Europe
• $ value is decling relative to €
• “No experts” management model will not
continue to work
• need mentors to teach staff how to run a multi-million
dollar company
• employees not developing as fast as the business
11. Issues Going Forward
•Should Dansko partner with a big shoe
company?
• Suitor has over $1B in annual revenue
• Many industry experts
12. Option 1: Manufactoring
Keep Manufacturing in
Europe
Move Manufacturing to Asia
or South America
Pros
--Lower costs
Cons
-Quality could suffer
Pros
-Higher quality
-Fits company’s image
Cons
-Expensive
13. Option 2: Outside Sources
Hire More Outside Experts Partner with Big Shoe
Company
Pros
-could mentor current employees
-would offer expert solutions to
current problems
Pros
-Gain money and experience big
company has
-would take stress off current
employees (and Cabot)
Cons
-Would be paid more than current
employees
-most experts already have good
jobs
-current employees may resent them
Cons
-Dansko would lose its autonomy
-Current culture could change
dramatically
-Dansko might become a face in the
crowd
14. Option 3: Big Box Retailers
Pros
-increased market share
-higher revenues
Cons
-Saturated market
-decreased profit margins
-no longer gourmet
-no longer the shoe everye wants,
but can’t get
15. Option 4: New Organizational Structure
Pros
-Keep Mandy stress free
-Mandy keeps control of the company
-get professional advice and mentoring
Cons
-Hard to obtain experts
-higher admin costs
-Lose some control
16. Recommendation
•create a new organizational structure and
bring in experts
•best option to solve multiple problems
•Mandy’s stress level
•lack of industry knowledge
•keeping control of the company
•not fading into obscurity
17. How will we implement this?
•Financial Resources
• extra salaries to hire experts
•Time
•To implement new organizational structure
• 3 months to a year
•Depends on adaptation of employees