3. So why don’t we see firms with high levels of debt?
Tax exhaustion
Debt capacity
Agency costs
Financial distress (bankruptcy)
4. Tax Exhaustion & Debt Capacity
Tax exhaustion
Only deduct interest if you have profit
First unit of debt adds more to Vf than later ones
Vf rises until Marginal Cost (MC) of debt = Marginal Cost
(MC) of equity
Debt capacity
Level of debt relates to level of security
Security relates to asset availability & type
Affected by second hand market (& resale value) and rate of
depreciation
5. Agency Costs..
Managers are agents for S/H
Managers adopt strategies to benefit S/H – can be at
expense of D/H
Strategies = agency costs
Costs = higher interest rates, restrictive covenants
Covenants: limit asset sales, restrict additional debt,
restrict dividends
Managers may avoid debt to avoid such restrictions
6. Financial Distress
M&M did not recognise cost of bankruptcy as assume assets
can be disposed of quickly at full value.. but…
Costs:
Administration/legal costs of wind up
Reduction in asset value
& rising debt increases risk of bankruptcy
There is a chance that a firm will go under in any year
so Vf is reduced by: PV of Expected (value of bankruptcy)
Also known as Trade off Theory
7. Trade off Theory
Vf
Optimum D/E
D/E
PV of B/K
PV of Tax
Optimum D/E: Increase in PV of tax shield = Increase in PV of E (Bankcruptcy B/K costs)
8. Summary: Value of the firm can be altered by changing the
gearing level
9. Activity
Attempt the following question:
Workshop Question D2W2 Q1
This question asks you to consider M&M and the trade
off theory
Chapter 18 p806-809 may help with this question
10. Observations
Pecking Order Theory: Finance is selected in an order of
preference
Retained earnings first (changing dividends as needed)
Then debt
Then equity
Asymmetric Information
Managers have insight into profitability & prospects of the firm
When shares are issued – prices drop
When debt is issued – little impact on share prices
11. Activity
Attempt the following question:
Workshop Question D2W2 Q2 & Q3
These two questions consider the Pecking Order Theory,
firstly considering the theory itself (you may refer back
to discussion on day 1 about equity financing) and the
application in a company.
Ch 18 p. 814-816 may help.
12. Capital Structure Considerations
Tax position
Agency costs
Managers avoid strategies that may endanger their post
Type of firm
R & D firms often have low debt
Industry averages
‘group norms’
Impact on financial statements
EPS (business risk) & gearing (financial risk)
Interest cover
How easily can interest payments be covered
13. Impact of debt
Two companies, same business risk, but different capital structures
Alpha plc Gamma plc
£m £m
£1 ordinary shares 200 340
12% pref shares 100 50
10% debentures 100 10
400 400
Currently both generate £80m profit before interest & tax and corporate
tax is at a rate of 30% …calculating their EPS
14. EPS
Alpha plc Gamma plc
£m £m
PBIT 80.0 80.0
Less interest 10.0 1.0
PBT 70.0 79.0
Less CT (30%) 21.0 23.7
PAT 49.0 55.3
Less pref div 12.0 6.0
Avail to ord s/h 37.0 49.0
EPS 18.5p > 14.5p
Activity:Consider EPS if PBIT is only
£40m?
Alpha plc Gamma plc
£m £m
£1 ordinary shares 200 340
12% pref shares 100 50
10% debentures 100 10
400 400
17. In summary
Can we change Ko & Vf by changing D& E
It appears so
Is there an optimum level of debt
Managers behave as though there is
How do we find it?
Not sure, no rules, no models, no easy answer…
But firms must consider the decision with respect to risk
(business & financial), investment plans, dividend policy,
industry, asset backing, tax etc..
18. Activity
Please use the rest of this workshop time to work on
Coursework TASK 2
Post any questions you may have in the Discussion
Board
19. And now…
Reading
Arnold & Lewis (2019) Chapter 18
Arnold (2013) Chapter 18
Articles – capital structure