Michael Anderson has over 28 years of experience as a computer forensic expert and special agent for the IRS Criminal Investigation Division. He has investigated hundreds of cases involving tax evasion, money laundering, and identity theft. Some significant cases he worked on included the prosecution of a narcotics kingpin in Miami who received 240 years in prison and an identity theft case involving $60 million in fraudulent tax refunds. He also led the forensic investigation of a tax protester group called American Rights Litigators, which resulted in over 16 trials and convictions for clients who attempted $1.5 billion in tax fraud.
CJA 215 Effective Communication - tutorialrank.comBartholomew24
For more course tutorials visit
www.tutorialrank.com
Most crimes applicable to citizens are covered under state or federal statutes. Upon completion of this assignment, you will be able to locate your state statutes, search within them a variety of crimes, and decipher their elements.
Tasks:
David Cuillier prepared this presentation on making better use of public records for journalists attending APME's Phoenix NewsTrain on April 6-7, 2018. Cuillier is associate professor at and director of the University of Arizona School of Journalism. His seven steps include: 1) Get in a document state of mind. 2) Find the records. 3) Know the law. 4) Order records effectively.
5) Overcome denials. 6) Be unafraid of suing. 7) Just do it! The presentation is accompanied by a 39-page handout of the same name that was produced by Cuillier, Charles N. Davis from the University of Georgia and Joel Campbell from Brigham Young University, all three Society of Professional Journalists trainers in freedom of information. A second handout with the presentation is a pop quiz on Arizona public records. NewsTrain is a training initiative of Associated Press Media Editors (APME). More info: http://bit.ly/NewsTrain
For more classes visit
www.snaptutorial.com
Most crimes applicable to citizens are covered under state or federal statutes. Upon completion of this assignment, you will be able to locate your state statutes, search within them a variety of crimes, and decipher their elements.
Tasks:
For more classes visit
www.snaptutorial.com
Most crimes applicable to citizens are covered under state or federal statutes. Upon completion of this assignment, you will be able to locate your state statutes, search within them a variety of crimes, and decipher their elements.
Tasks:
For more classes visit
www.snaptutorial.com
Most crimes applicable to citizens are covered under state or federal statutes. Upon completion of this assignment, you will be able to locate your state statutes, search within them a variety of crimes, and decipher their elements.
Tasks:
CJA 215 Effective Communication - tutorialrank.comBartholomew24
For more course tutorials visit
www.tutorialrank.com
Most crimes applicable to citizens are covered under state or federal statutes. Upon completion of this assignment, you will be able to locate your state statutes, search within them a variety of crimes, and decipher their elements.
Tasks:
David Cuillier prepared this presentation on making better use of public records for journalists attending APME's Phoenix NewsTrain on April 6-7, 2018. Cuillier is associate professor at and director of the University of Arizona School of Journalism. His seven steps include: 1) Get in a document state of mind. 2) Find the records. 3) Know the law. 4) Order records effectively.
5) Overcome denials. 6) Be unafraid of suing. 7) Just do it! The presentation is accompanied by a 39-page handout of the same name that was produced by Cuillier, Charles N. Davis from the University of Georgia and Joel Campbell from Brigham Young University, all three Society of Professional Journalists trainers in freedom of information. A second handout with the presentation is a pop quiz on Arizona public records. NewsTrain is a training initiative of Associated Press Media Editors (APME). More info: http://bit.ly/NewsTrain
For more classes visit
www.snaptutorial.com
Most crimes applicable to citizens are covered under state or federal statutes. Upon completion of this assignment, you will be able to locate your state statutes, search within them a variety of crimes, and decipher their elements.
Tasks:
For more classes visit
www.snaptutorial.com
Most crimes applicable to citizens are covered under state or federal statutes. Upon completion of this assignment, you will be able to locate your state statutes, search within them a variety of crimes, and decipher their elements.
Tasks:
For more classes visit
www.snaptutorial.com
Most crimes applicable to citizens are covered under state or federal statutes. Upon completion of this assignment, you will be able to locate your state statutes, search within them a variety of crimes, and decipher their elements.
Tasks:
For more classes visit
www.snaptutorial.com
Most crimes applicable to citizens are covered under state or federal statutes. Upon completion of this assignment, you will be able to locate your state statutes, search within them a variety of crimes, and decipher their elements.
For more course tutorials visit
www.tutorialrank.com
Most crimes applicable to citizens are covered under state or federal statutes. Upon completion of this assignment, you will be able to locate your state statutes, search within them a variety of crimes, and decipher their elements.
CJA 215 Life of the Mind/newtonhelp.com bellflower13
For more course tutorials visit
www.newtonhelp.com
Most crimes applicable to citizens are covered under state or federal statutes. Upon completion of this assignment, you will be able to locate your state statutes, search within them a variety of crimes, and decipher their elements.
Tasks:
Can Information Management Law Keep Up With Technology?IQPC Exchange
Jason Baron, Director of Litigation at the National Archives and Records Administration, joins Legal IQ to discuss technological developments, information retention and edisclosure.
Public Records and Breaking News, a handout compiled by Michelle Guido for her Planning for Breaking News session at Orlando NewsTrain on May 15-16, 2015. Instructor Michelle Guido offers a a checklist for constructing a breaking-news coverage plan. Guido is a journalist with 25 years of award-winning work across print, digital and television platforms. Most recently, she was managing editor of WESH 2 News, the NBC affiliate in Orlando.
Municipalities & The Internet: A Few Legal IssuesShawn Tuma
In the Fall of 2000, I delivered this presentation at the North Central Texas Council of Governments' e-Government 2000 Fall Forum. There were no slides at this presentation but this is the paper that was delivered to the group.
For more classes visit
www.snaptutorial.com
Most crimes applicable to citizens are covered under state or federal statutes. Upon completion of this assignment, you will be able to locate your state statutes, search within them a variety of crimes, and decipher their elements.
For more course tutorials visit
www.tutorialrank.com
Most crimes applicable to citizens are covered under state or federal statutes. Upon completion of this assignment, you will be able to locate your state statutes, search within them a variety of crimes, and decipher their elements.
CJA 215 Life of the Mind/newtonhelp.com bellflower13
For more course tutorials visit
www.newtonhelp.com
Most crimes applicable to citizens are covered under state or federal statutes. Upon completion of this assignment, you will be able to locate your state statutes, search within them a variety of crimes, and decipher their elements.
Tasks:
Can Information Management Law Keep Up With Technology?IQPC Exchange
Jason Baron, Director of Litigation at the National Archives and Records Administration, joins Legal IQ to discuss technological developments, information retention and edisclosure.
Public Records and Breaking News, a handout compiled by Michelle Guido for her Planning for Breaking News session at Orlando NewsTrain on May 15-16, 2015. Instructor Michelle Guido offers a a checklist for constructing a breaking-news coverage plan. Guido is a journalist with 25 years of award-winning work across print, digital and television platforms. Most recently, she was managing editor of WESH 2 News, the NBC affiliate in Orlando.
Municipalities & The Internet: A Few Legal IssuesShawn Tuma
In the Fall of 2000, I delivered this presentation at the North Central Texas Council of Governments' e-Government 2000 Fall Forum. There were no slides at this presentation but this is the paper that was delivered to the group.
In Weeks 2 through 4, you will follow a scenario as a case moves fro.docxEstelaJeffery653
In Weeks 2 through 4, you will follow a scenario as a case moves from initial crime through sentencing. This scenario is representative of many real-world cases where multiple jurisdictions are involved. As the case progresses, the relevant laws and various parties (police officers, attorneys, community members, and so on) all affect how the case moves through the criminal justice system. Each week, you will receive additional information that may influence how you interpret the case or choose to proceed.
This week, you review the case from the perspective of the
judge
and a
jury member
:
Review
the scenario presented in Weeks 2 and 3 and the additional information provided below:
Mr. Stamps was put on trial for robbery of the postal employee at the post office. A jury of 12 individuals was empanelled to hear the case and after 2 hours of deliberations returned a guilty verdict for robbery.
Use
the
Sentencing Guidelines Calculator
(which is based on federal law) to explore some of the factors that would be considered in sentencing Mr. Stamps in federal district court for a violation of 18 U.S.C. 2114 (robbery).
Write
a 2- to 4-page analysis of the scenario in which you address the following:
As a judge, how would sentencing guidelines play a role when imposing your sentence?
What legal requirements govern how judges use sentencing guideline in a criminal case?
What are some of the philosophical issues that the jury members might discuss during their deliberations related to sentencing the defendant?
If the defendant was convicted of the post office robbery in your state’s trial court, what avenues for appeal would be available to him? What options would the defendant have for review of the conviction by federal courts? What options for appeal would be available if the defendant had been tried and convicted in U.S. District Court?
Support
your analysis with a minimum of two references. The course textbook may be one resource. Additional references may include scholarly articles, websites, blogs, podcasts, or other relevant sources.
Adhere
to APA guidelines.
**The first week's scenario:
Earlier today, an individual rushed into the lobby of the local post office and forced his way past several customers to make his way to the retail counter. The individual then produced a firearm and pointed at the postal clerk and demanded all of the money from the clerk. The clerk complied with the individual’s demands, and the individual fled the scene of the crime on foot with the stolen money. The following people witnessed the crime: the postal clerk and two customers (John and Jill). There was no video surveillance inside of the post office, but several stores surrounding the post office were equipped with surveillance systems.
Second week's added scenario information:
Federal and state law-enforcement officers were to interview the witnesses at the post office and canvass the immediate area for additional evidence. Police reviewed s.
Expert witness CV / resume for Jason Coombs in fields of forensic engineering and expert witness services such as: derivatives trading algorithms, software, cloud computing, virtualization, information security and forensics, Internet architecture and services, software development and software analysis, electronic commerce, payments, trademarks, copyright infringement, cybercrime investigation, cybersecurity, criminal defense, patent litigation, vulnerability research, and network intrusion countermeasures.
The final project for this course will allow you to see yourself in chestnutkaitlyn
The final project for this course will allow you to see yourself in a range of criminal justice practitioner roles. Each position will require you to address different issues and concerns indicative of that area of criminal justice—some requiring research, others requiring you to apply methods of inquiry, all leading to the creation of a case analysis portfolio. The final project is supported by two milestones, which will be submitted at various points throughout the course to scaffold learning and ensure quality final submissions. These milestones will be submitted in Modules Two and Four. The final submission will occur in Module Seven. In this assignment, you will demonstrate your mastery of the following course outcomes: •Illustrate the major historical milestones of criminal law in the United States for their impact on the criminal Justice system and the role of the practitioner
•Evaluate constitutional parameters set by courts for their influence on the performance of law‐enforcement agencies
•Evaluate the impact of emerging technology on the development of an ethical criminal investigation • Apply the sociological and criminological scientific methods of inquiry to determine a defendant’s mental state and possible criminal defenses for case preparation
Prompt For the final assessment, you will need to imagine yourself in a variety of criminal justice practitioner roles. You will be presented with a series of case scenarios and will be required to address each of them by utilizing case law research. You will then have to make decisions based on your findings, evidence, and any procedural knowledge you have obtained throughout the course.
The final submission will require you to respond to each one of the following situations and compile them together for a case analysis portfolio. Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:
I. Miranda
A uniformed police officer is dispatched to a bank robbery. Upon arrival, John Smith is already under arrest by the detectives for committing the robbery and shooting the guard. He is placed in the back of the officer’s cruiser. During the drive back to the station, Smith yells out, “I am so sorry I shot him!” One month later, the officer is called to testify about Smith’s statement. Smith’s defense attorney argues that the officer failed to read him his Miranda rights. Consider if his statements are admissible given the fact he was not read his Miranda Rights prior to making them.
A.
Imagine yourself as the judge presiding over this case. Clearly and accurately evaluate the constitutional parameters that emerged from the Miranda decision. How has this case influenced the practice of law enforcement?
B.
Describe your ruling for the bank robbery case, citing the Miranda case. How did Miranda influence your decision‐making process?
II. Jewelry Store Robbery
A detective was conducting surveillan ...
The final project for this course will allow you to see yourself imosyrettcc
The final project for this course will allow you to see yourself in a range of criminal justice practitioner roles. Each position will require you to address different issues and concerns indicative of that area of criminal justice—some requiring research, others requiring you to apply methods of inquiry, all leading to the creation of a case analysis portfolio. The final project is supported by two milestones, which will be submitted at various points throughout the course to scaffold learning and ensure quality final submissions. These milestones will be submitted in Modules Two and Four. The final submission will occur in Module Seven. In this assignment, you will demonstrate your mastery of the following course outcomes: •Illustrate the major historical milestones of criminal law in the United States for their impact on the criminal Justice system and the role of the practitioner
•Evaluate constitutional parameters set by courts for their influence on the performance of law‐enforcement agencies
•Evaluate the impact of emerging technology on the development of an ethical criminal investigation • Apply the sociological and criminological scientific methods of inquiry to determine a defendant’s mental state and possible criminal defenses for case preparation
Prompt For the final assessment, you will need to imagine yourself in a variety of criminal justice practitioner roles. You will be presented with a series of case scenarios and will be required to address each of them by utilizing case law research. You will then have to make decisions based on your findings, evidence, and any procedural knowledge you have obtained throughout the course.
The final submission will require you to respond to each one of the following situations and compile them together for a case analysis portfolio. Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:
I. Miranda
A uniformed police officer is dispatched to a bank robbery. Upon arrival, John Smith is already under arrest by the detectives for committing the robbery and shooting the guard. He is placed in the back of the officer’s cruiser. During the drive back to the station, Smith yells out, “I am so sorry I shot him!” One month later, the officer is called to testify about Smith’s statement. Smith’s defense attorney argues that the officer failed to read him his Miranda rights. Consider if his statements are admissible given the fact he was not read his Miranda Rights prior to making them.
A.
Imagine yourself as the judge presiding over this case. Clearly and accurately evaluate the constitutional parameters that emerged from the Miranda decision. How has this case influenced the practice of law enforcement?
B.
Describe your ruling for the bank robbery case, citing the Miranda case. How did Miranda influence your decision‐making process?
II. Jewelry Store Robbery
A detective was conducting surveillance outs ...
David Cuillier offered this 39-page handout to journalists attending APME's Phoenix NewsTrain on April 6-7, 2018. Cuillier is associate professor at and director of the University of Arizona School of Journalism. This handout was produced by Cuillier, Charles N. Davis from the University of Georgia and Joel Campbell from Brigham Young University, all three SPJ newsroom trainers in freedom of information (www.spj.org). It includes sections on the news stories possible with public records, strategies for accessing public records, and resources on access and on data. It accompanies Cuillier's Phoenix NewsTrain presentation of the same name. A second handout with the presentation is a pop quiz on Arizona public records. NewsTrain is a training initiative of Associated Press Media Editors (APME). More info: http://bit.ly/NewsTrain
First assignment 4-1Discussion Open Forum for Criminal Investig.docxernestc3
First assignment 4-1
Discussion: Open Forum for Criminal Investigation
During Weeks 4–7, you participate in an Open Forum Discussion concerning the criminal investigative analysis you are conducting for your assignments and Final Project. This is your opportunity to discuss aspects of the case and seek clarification about elements of evidence that will support your conclusion of the case and eventual report to the law enforcement agency that requested your services.
When analyzing a case, it is essential that the analyst has access to all investigative material. As you review the case material, determine:
Do you have all information relevant to the crime scene?
Photos
Reports
Interviews
Forensic Reports
Do you have all information relevant to the medical examination?
Autopsy Reports
Autopsy Photos
Forensic Reports
Do you have all relevant information for the victim?
In this Open Forum Discussion, you begin to collaborate with your colleagues to determine your initial thoughts about the case.
Review the evidence of the case.
What are your initial thoughts on the crime scene?
What other things would you like to know about the victim?
As you reviewed the documents, are there other areas about which you would like additional information?
CASE STUDY I have addition file that need to be sent
Second Assignment 2
Assignment: Investigating a Crime: Phase I – Organization and Summary of Information
A local law enforcement agency has asked you to review the case evidence files of a crime and provide a report and presentation concerning the offender and the victim. All the evidence has been provided in the Learning Resources. It has been organized using a standard method for your convenience, but you might experiment with your own system of organization. The file titled “Document Index” will assist you locating specific evidence relevant to the case.
For this Assignment, you will conduct Phase I of the process: Organization and Summary of Information.
In a 2- to 3-page report:
Provide the facts of the case concerning the offense, victim, and offender. Also, provide a summary of notes specific to the victim. This should include:
Victim
Current relationship status (e.g., single, married, divorced)
Employment history
Hobbies/routine activities
Educational history
Family history (e.g., parents, children)
Personality issues
Mental health issues
Criminal history
Substance/alcohol use abuse
Use of social media
.
1. CV for Michael Anderson
Computer Forensic Expert
2856 Hillbrook Way
Decatur, GA 30033
404-502-0539
gacis2014@gmail.com
This is a summary of my work and trials as a Special Agent and Computer Investigative Specialist for
Internal Revenue Service – Criminal Investigation Division.
Special Agent (March 1987 – January 2, 2015): I became a special agent with the Criminal Investigation
Division of the IRS in 1987. As a S/A I have been responsible for investigating individuals, and businesses for
violations of various criminal charges including money laundering, RICO, tax evasion, mail fraud and
defrauding the government, multi-agency Organized Crime and Drug Enforcement Task Force cases
(OCDETF), multi-million dollar bankruptcy cases and multi-million dollar boiler room investigations and identity
theft cases. On January 2, 2015, I retired from my law enforcement position.
Computer Investigative Specialist – In 1990 I attended Seized Computer and Evidence Recovery. In 1995
I attended Computer Investigative Specialist training at the University of North Texas. As a CIS I am tasked to
recover evidence from electronic media such as computers, cell phones, tablets, floppy disks, CD’s, DVD’s,
and GPS’. I have testified dozens of times in federal court concerning evidence obtained during search
warrants. I have been qualified twice as an expert in computer forensics in federal court. As a CIS I have
processed tens of thousands of computers and other electronic devices. I have received training in various
forensic software packages, including XWays, ILook, Encase, and Access Data’s Forensic Tool Kit. I also had
the unique assignment of being a Macintosh or Apple specialist and I have received training in the Black Bag
Forensic package specifically used for Apple products. I have completed and instructed multiple classes on
data recovery and Microsoft products.
Significant Cases:
US vs. Salvatore Magluta – Miami: Narcotics King Pin who transported and distributed tens of thousands of
pounds of cocaine into the US. I testified in the trial against Mr. Magluta where he received 240 years in a
maximum security prison.
US vs. Compubras – Miami: Computer assembler charged with tax evasion. Testified concerning important
documents retrieved from computers. I was qualified as a computer forensic expert.
US Vs. Bernardo Davis – Atlanta: Identity theft case involving roughly 60 million in fraudulent tax refunds
claimed. Testified concerning documents retrieved off computers and text messages off of cell phones.
US Vs. Govereh - Atlanta: Testified concerning tax returns, pictures, internet artifacts, and documents
recovered from various computers seized during a search warrant.
Gregory Harrison (NC): Mr. Harrison ran multiple temporary labor companies which were located all over
the Southeastern United States. Mr. Harrison failed to file employment tax returns and used the withholdings
from his thousands of employees for personal gain. I was called into the case to assist in the recovery of the
accounting software that was stored on tape drives. Using the tape drives and tapes recovered during a
search warrant that had been executed years before I recovered the data and then analyzed it to determine
the amount of the loss. The accounting program was one that was obsolete and was out of production. I
conducted a large amount of research into the accounting program in order to get it operational. I located and
interviewed the original owners of the software and also the programmer but due to licensing issues I got very
little information. Through trial and error I eventually got the accounting software to run. I generated hundreds
of reports showing a loss of $60,000,000.00. During the trial I summarized my reports and presented the loss.
One of the prosecutors said “Mike is the best government witness I’ve ever worked with.” My testimony
resulted in guilty verdicts on all 69 counts. Mr. Harrison was sentenced to forty plus years.
American Rights Litigators-In 2004 I was the lead CIS on the execution of a search warrant at the offices of
American Rights Litigators (ARL). ARL was an organization with close to 5000 clients who assisted the
obstruction of collection of income taxes for their clients. At the search warrant there were 33 computers
including a Linux Email Server, Fax Server, and a Windows 2000 Server containing an access database of all
2. of ARL’s clients and their activities. I secured, imaged and analyzed the computers and the servers. Using
the Access Database I identified potential targets for the IRS.
• Specific ARL Trials: Wesley Snipes – Ocala: Spent one month in Ocala during the trial assisting with
prep and witness interviews. Testified for 4 plus hours concerning electronic evidence recovered by me
during the investigation.
• Eddie Kahn Et. Al.– Ocala and Washington DC: Mr. Kahn was the founder of ARL. I testified in two
trials concerning Mr. Kahn and most of the employees of ARL. During the trial in DC I prepped for over a
month and stayed in the courthouse for a month assisting with the trial. I was the first government
witness who introduced over 80% of the evidence. I was on the witness stand for 4 ½ days mostly under
direct examination.
• US Vs. Mahoney – Boston: I testified concerning the electronic evidence and physical evidence
obtained concerning the defendant during the ARL warrant.
• US Vs. Brown – Boston: I testified concerning the electronic evidence and physical evidence obtained
concerning the defendant during the ARL warrant.
• US Vs. Dr. Rodney Justin – North Carolina: I testified concerning the electronic evidence and physical
evidence obtained concerning the defendant during the ARL warrant.
• US Vs. Cote – Hartford: I testified concerning the electronic evidence and physical evidence obtained
concerning the defendant during the ARL warrant. I recovered and presented to the jury Skype
messages between the defendant and his wife that aided in his conviction.
• US Vs. Beiter – Ft. Lauderdale: I testified concerning the electronic evidence and physical evidence
obtained concerning the defendant during the ARL warrant.
• US Vs. Brent Gross – Detroit: I testified concerning the electronic evidence and physical evidence
obtained concerning the defendant during the ARL warrant.
These are only a few of the trials I testified in relative to the search warrant at ARL. Each of these defendants
was a client of ARL. These trials were separate and distinct from the two trials concerning Mr. Kahn and his
employees. Over a 10 year period, I testified in approximately 16 trials concerning the clients of ARL. In each
of the case the defendants were convicted and received lengthy sentences. Mr. Kahn is currently in prison for
20 years and each of the employees received 10 years each. The attempted fraud that was perpetrated by
ARL totaled well in excess of 1.5 billion dollars. I acted as the evidentiary and summary witness in DC.