2. 3 Questions
What are the important behavioral features of the crime that may help
identify and successfully prosecute the perpetrator?
What suggestions can be made about the characteristics of the offender that
may help identify him or her?
Are there any other crimes that are likely to have been committed by the
same person?
3. Introduction to Criminal Profiling
Profiling is a technique or approach for solving crime. Some scientist define it as
a forensic technique used by forensic investigators and law enforcement
agencies to understand why criminals are committing crime, to classify criminal
behavior and to solve crimes that have already been committed (Saroha, 2014).
Others view it as a tool used by forensic experts to identify the offender’s
behavioral tendencies, personality traits, demographic variables, and
geographical variables based on the information and characteristics of the crime
(Lickiewicz, 2011). However, the general consensus is that criminal profiling
involves collecting inferences about the traits of the individual responsible for
the series of crime or for a particular crime.
It involves understanding what a particular crime says about the perpetrator
(Kirwan, & Power, 2013). It is used by forensic investigators and law
enforcement agencies to understand and apprehend criminal offenders. As a
forensic technique, criminal profiling enables investigative agencies to use the
specific information to focus their attention on people with personality traits
that parallel those of other offenders who have committed other similar
offences (Kirwan, & Power, 2013).
4. Introduction
There is no common definition in the special literature. There are diverse
interpretations of criminal profiling and different terms are used: criminal
profiling; offender profiling, criminal profiling, psychological profiling,
criminal investigative analysis, crime scene analysis, behavioural profiling,
criminal personality profiling, socio-psychological profiling and criminological
profiling, more recently, investigative psychology. Generally speaking,
criminal profiling involves making inferences about the physical, habitual,
emotional, psychological, and even vocation characteristics of criminals .
Integrating the sciences and the arts, criminal profiling allows investigators to
analyze victims and crime scene and comparing them to similar crimes
committed by known offenders’ personalities and traits. From this, the
criminal profiler can predict the unknown offender’s characteristics including
sex, age, and level of mental stability, geographical location and motivation
(Lickiewicz, 2011). The investigators can also link other offences committed
by the offender from the offender’s signature and modus operandi identified
from the physical evidence collected at the setting where the crime occurred
and scene of crime (Saroha, 2014)
5. Definitions
Profiling—requires sketching the significant psychological and demographic features of a person or
persons.
Criminal profiling – Criminal profiling refers to the process of identifying personality
traits, behavioral tendencies, geographic locations and demographic or biological descriptors of an
offender based on characteristics of the crime
OR
is a technique whereby the probable characteristics of a criminal offender or offenders are predicted
based on the behaviors exhibited in the commission of a crime.
OR
A collection of leads and a biological sketch of behavioral patterns, trends, and tendencies
OR
A forensic technique which seeks to provide investigative agencies with specific information which will
help focus attention on individuals with personality traits that parallel traits of other perpetrators who
have committed similar other offenses
6. Goals of Profiling
The primary goal of profiling is to narrow the field of possible suspects.
To provide a descriptive template of the features that characterize the probable perpetrator(s) of
a particular crime(s) under investigation.
To provide tactical suggestions on how facets of a criminal investigation may be undertaken.
As such, criminal profiling contains information about the perpetrators (Kirwan,
2011):
• Likely demographics (i.e., gender and age)
• Legal history including history of prior criminal convictions/offenses and any antecedence
• Vocational backgrounds that is the work the perpetrator is likely to be involved in, if any
• Social interests and habits (hobbies, sports, and other interests in which the perpetrator
may have)
• Family characteristics including the offender’s family background
• Various personality characteristics including the offender’s appearance, demeanor etc
• Mode of transport (i.e., type of vehicle that they offender may have)
7. Vocabulary
Criminal profiler—a person who infers the personality and characteristics of a
suspect based on information gathered from a crime scene
Modus operandi (MO)—also referred to as the method of operation, a
recognized pattern of behavior in the commission of a crime
Signature—something unusual or specific left at the crime scene by the
perpetrator
Victim—person who has experienced harm, injuries, loss, or death
Victimology—the study of victims affected by crime, accidents, or natural
disasters
8. History in brief
1940s – First recorded use by psychiatrist Walter Langer during WWII
commissioned to construct a psychodynamic profile of Hitler.
1957 – Psychiatrist James Brussels worked with NYPD to construct a profile of
the Mad Bomber.
1970s – 1980s – FBI (Howard Teten, John Douglas, Robert Ressler, Roy
Hazelwood and others) became involved in psychological profiling and
popularized the technique.
1990s – 2003 – attempt (by David Canter, Maurice Godwin, Ron Hoimes, Robert
Keppel, Brent Turvey, Kim Rossmo and others) to scientize profiling and move
the practice beyond the purview of the FBI.
9.
10. Profiling a Serial Killer
NY—1989, multiple murders
Police ask for FBI profiler, Gregg McCrary
McCrary studied the murder’s MO, and
Concluded that the murderer probably would
return to scene of the crime
Police delayed collecting the next victim
Arthur Shawcross returned to the crime scene
and was arrested for the murder of 11 women
11. THE STRUCTURE AND APPLICATIONS OF CRIMINAL
PROFILES
For the most part, a criminal profile consists of information that predominantly serves
to describe the biographical features of the probable perpetrator(s) of a crime. Thus,
criminal profiles typically contain information about the probable offender concerning
the following:
Likely demographics, such as age and gender.
Legal history, including any antecedence (i.e., history of prior criminal
offenses/convictions).
Vocational background (i.e., the work the offender is likely to be engaged in, if any).
Family characteristics (i.e., the likely background of the offender’s family).
Habits and social interests (sports, hobbies, or other interests that the offender may
have).
Mode of transport (type of vehicle, if any, the offender has).
Various personality characteristics (the offender’s demeanor, appearance, etc).
Geographic profiling: approximate location of an offender’s residence
12. THE STRUCTURE AND APPLICATIONS OF CRIMINAL PROFILES
The range of possible tactics concerning how information contained in a
profile may be used is very much dependent on the particular
circumstances of the crime under investigation as well as the ingenuity
and innovation of the consultant profiler. On this score it should be
noted that many of the controversies related to criminal profiling have
involved highly unethical, unprofessional, and sometimes even unlawful
tactical applications of criminal profiles.
Some of the more conventional applications of criminal profiles are
listed here:
A guide for how to potentially identify suspect(s) to the crime under
investigation.
A guide for how to prioritize/focus investigative lines of inquiry on
existing suspects.
A guide for patrol policing operations to potentially reduce the
commission of further offenses.
A guide for possible surveillance operations.
A guide for search and seizure operations.
13. Types of Profiling
Modern criminal profiling takes two forms: the deductive and inductive approaches.
Deductive is evidence-based involving analyzing the evidence found from the case in order
to construct the offender’s behavioral profile. This way, the offender’s profile is constructed
based on the evidences and information found at the crime scene (Kirwan, 2011).
Professionals use this approach to get into the mind of the criminal. They try to think in the
same way the offender may have thought whiling committing the crime. This type of
criminal profiling is largely based on human intelligence rather than on statistical data.
Inductive profiling on the other hand uses the statistical analysis of the previous offender’s
characteristics to generate a generalized behavioral pattern of the perpetrator. Comparative
and statistical analyses are used to create the profile of the criminal. Information comes
from results of studies of previously convicted criminals, their interviews, observation, data
from official databases, and the usage of clinical methods. The profiler analyzes all these
information and constructs a possible profile of the likely offender of the type of crime
basing on the traits of criminals that committed similar types of crimes. The inductive
technique is basically based on the inductive logic, which forms the basis of narrowing down
and predicting who will commit specific types of crimes (Halder, & Jaishankar, 2011).
14. Stereotypes of cybercriminals
(1) are socially inept but bright;
(2) have a great technical skills and knowledge and very high IQs;
(3) are males and usually boys;
(4) teenage boys with computers and dangerous criminals, and
(5) all cybercriminals are never violent.
16. a) Input
The profiling inputs stage initiates the criminal-profile-generating process.
Comprehensive case resources are essential for accurate profiling. In
homicide cases, the required information includes a complete synopsis of
the crime and a description of the crime scene, encircling factors
indigenous to that area to the time of the incident such as political and
social environment and the weather conditions. Complete background
information on the victim is also vital in homicide profiles.
The data should cover domestic setting, reputation, hobbies, physical
condition, employment, habits, fears, personality, criminal history,
family relationships, and social conduct.
Forensic information concerning to the crime is also critical to the profiling
process, including an autopsy report with toxicology/serology results,
autopsy photographs, and photographs of the cleansed wounds.
17. b) Decision Process Models
The decision process begins by organizing and arranging the inputs into meaningful patterns. Six
key decision points, or models, differentiate and organize the information from Stage 1 and
form an underlying decisional structure for profiling:
Homicide Type and Style: Anything beyond three victims is classified as a mass murder; that is,
four or more victims in one location, and within one event.
Primary intent of the Murderer: In some cases, murder may be secondary action and not itself
the primary intent of the offender. The killer's primary intent could be: (1) criminal enterprise.
(2) sexual or (3) emotional, selfish, or cause-specific.
Victim Risk: The concept of the victim's risk is involved at several stages of the profiling process
and provides information about the suspect in terms of how he/she operates. Risk is determined
using such factors as age, occupation, physical stature, lifestyle, resistance ability, and victim’s
location, and is classified as high, moderate, or low.
18. Escalation: Information about escalation is derived from an analysis of facts and
patterns from the prior decision process stages/models. Investigative profilers are
able to assume the sequence of acts committed during the crime. From this
deduction, they may be able to make determinations about the potential of the
criminal not only to escalate his crimes (e.g., rape, murder, assault etc), but to
repeat his crimes in serial fashion.
Time Factors: There are several time factors that need to be considered in
producing a criminal profile. These factors include the length of time required: (1)
to kill the victim, (2) to commit additional acts with the body, and (3) to dispose
off the body. The time of day or night that the crime was committed is also
important, as it may provide information on the lifestyle and occupation of the
offender
Location Factors: Information about location-where the victim was first
approached, where the crime occurred, and if the crime and death scenes differ-
provide yet additional data about the offender.
20. c) Crime Assessment Stage
This stage involves the reconstruction of the sequence of events and the
behavior of both the offender and victim.
Based on the various decisions of the previous stage, this reconstruction of
how things happened, how people behaved, and how they planned and
organized the encounter provides information about specific characteristics
to be generated for the criminal profile.
Assessments are made about the classification of the crime, its
organized/disorganized aspects, the offender's selection of a victim,
strategies used to control the victim, the sequence of crime, the
performance (or not) of the crime, the offender's motivation for the
crime, and crime scene dynamics.
21. The classification of the crime is determined through the decision
process outlined in the first decision process model.
Motivation
Is a difficult factor to judge because it requires dealing with the
inner thoughts and behavior of the offender. Motivation is more
easily determined in the organized offender who
premeditates, plans, and has the ability to carry out a plan of
action that is logical and complete. On the other hand, the
disorganized offender carries out his crimes by motivations that
frequently are derived from mental illnesses and accompanying
distorted thinking (resulting from delusions and hallucinations).
Drugs and alcohol, as well as panic and stress resulting from
disruptions during the execution of the crime, are factors which
must be considered in the overall assessment of the crime scene.
22. Crime Scene Dynamics
Crime scene dynamics are the numerous elements common to every crime
scene which must be interpreted by investigating officers and are at times
easily misunderstood. Examples include location of crime scene, cause of
death, method of killing, positioning of body, excessive trauma, and
location of wounds.
A basic premise of criminal profiling is that the way a person thinks that
directs the person's behavior. Thus, when the investigative profiler analyzes a
crime scene and notes certain critical factors, she or he may be able to
determine the motive and type of person who committed the crime.
23. The features of an Organized Crime Scene
Offense planned
Victim a targeted stranger
Victim personalized
Controlled conversation
Crime scene reflects overall control
Demands submissive victim
Restraints used
Aggressive acts prior to death
Body hidden
Weapon/evidence absent
victim or body transported from scene
24. The features of a disorganized Crime
Scene
Victim or location known
Depersonalizes victim
Minimal conversation
Crime scene random and sloppy
Sudden violence to victim
Minimal use of restraints
Sexual acts after death
Body left in view
Evidence/weapon often present
Body left at death scene
Associated with Psychosis
25. d) Criminal Profile Stage
The fourth stage in generating a criminal profile deals with the type of
person who committed the crime and that individual's behavioral
organization with relation to the crime.
Once this description is generated, the strategy of investigation can be
formulated, as this strategy requires a basic understanding of how an
individual will respond to a variety of investigative efforts.
Included in the criminal profile are background information
(demographics), physical characteristics, habits, beliefs and values,
pre-offense behavior leading to the crime, and post-offense
behavior.
It may also include investigative recommendations for interrogating or
interviewing, identifying and apprehending the offender.
The profile must fit with the earlier reconstruction of the crime, with
the evidence and with the key decision process models.
In addition, the investigative procedure developed from the
26. e)Investigation Stage
Once the similarity of the criminal profile is determined, a written report is
provided to the requesting agency and added to its ongoing investigative
efforts.
The investigative recommendations generated in Stage 4 are applied,
and suspects matching the profile are evaluated.
If identification, apprehension, and a confession result, the goal of the profile
effort has been met. If new evidence is generated (e.g., by another murder)
and/or there is no identification of a suspect, reevaluation occurs.
The information is reexamined and the profile revalidated.
27. f) Apprehension Stage
Once a suspect is apprehended, the agreement between the outcome and the
various stages in the profile-generating-process are examined.
When an apprehended suspect admits guilt, it is important to conduct a
detailed interview to check the total profiling process for validity.
28. M.O & Signature
METHOD OF OPERATION (M.O.)
How the offender committed the crime. Tells about the experience of the offender
and situational/contextual factors involved in the crime.
SIGNATURE
The behavior/expression of fantasy the killer must leave at the scene to satisfy
emotional/psychological needs. Goes beyond what’s necessary to commit crime
and tells about the offender’s psychological needs and motivation.
29. Factors that Shape M.O.
Trade/Professional Experience
Criminal experience and confidence
Contact with the criminal justice system
Offender Mood/Mental state
Unknown/unplanned influences