CROTON POINT AVENUE PROJECT


PRESENTATION TO THE VILLAGE MANAGER
       CROTON ON HUDSON, NY

             MAY 17, 2012
               (updated)
To avoid getting hung up in the details, I think the
        following 3 objectives are most important:


• Separate B-P’s and motor vehicles as long as possible

• Eliminate interchanges between B-P and vehicles

• Move interchanges to the safest possible place
I think the best way to accomplish the
          objectives is with 3 Changes:

• Move B-P lanes to the north side of CPA

• Extend B-P lanes up to Benedict Blvd

• Extend B-P lanes down to station
BP lanes extend down ramp and up to station, between
parked cars and fence (cars would then park diagonally).
BP lanes extend up to Benedict Boulevard,
covering one motor vehicle lane near intersection
There are many examples of separated
bike lanes, where bicyclists and
pedestrians travel together in opposing
directions – here are few examples,
including narrower lanes and higher
volume than in the CPA project …
Two examples of barriers follow. Having
one between bicyclists and motor vehicles
would improve safety, even if it is only a
painted buffer line and results in narrower
bike lanes.
Project Implementation Benefits

• Avoid traffic light at Rt.9N interchange

• Avoid re-engineering of Rt.9N ramp

• Elimination of 5 foot sidewalk on south side of
  CPA can be used to reduce right of way or
  whatever the highest priority is

• Address concerns of residents, trustees, & DOT
Improved Project Results

• Increased safety

• Facilitated traffic flow

• Reduced financial cost

• Easier B-P introduction and usage
Contact Information:

Bryan Dailey
220 Grand Street
Croton On Hudson, NY 10520
bwd2@cornell.edu
802-664-4148

CPA v2

  • 1.
    CROTON POINT AVENUEPROJECT PRESENTATION TO THE VILLAGE MANAGER CROTON ON HUDSON, NY MAY 17, 2012 (updated)
  • 2.
    To avoid gettinghung up in the details, I think the following 3 objectives are most important: • Separate B-P’s and motor vehicles as long as possible • Eliminate interchanges between B-P and vehicles • Move interchanges to the safest possible place
  • 3.
    I think thebest way to accomplish the objectives is with 3 Changes: • Move B-P lanes to the north side of CPA • Extend B-P lanes up to Benedict Blvd • Extend B-P lanes down to station
  • 5.
    BP lanes extenddown ramp and up to station, between parked cars and fence (cars would then park diagonally).
  • 6.
    BP lanes extendup to Benedict Boulevard, covering one motor vehicle lane near intersection
  • 7.
    There are manyexamples of separated bike lanes, where bicyclists and pedestrians travel together in opposing directions – here are few examples, including narrower lanes and higher volume than in the CPA project …
  • 11.
    Two examples ofbarriers follow. Having one between bicyclists and motor vehicles would improve safety, even if it is only a painted buffer line and results in narrower bike lanes.
  • 15.
    Project Implementation Benefits •Avoid traffic light at Rt.9N interchange • Avoid re-engineering of Rt.9N ramp • Elimination of 5 foot sidewalk on south side of CPA can be used to reduce right of way or whatever the highest priority is • Address concerns of residents, trustees, & DOT
  • 16.
    Improved Project Results •Increased safety • Facilitated traffic flow • Reduced financial cost • Easier B-P introduction and usage
  • 17.
    Contact Information: Bryan Dailey 220Grand Street Croton On Hudson, NY 10520 bwd2@cornell.edu 802-664-4148