Batman was accused of copyright infringement for making 3D reproductions of a sculpture and filming it without permission. The sculpture, called Zanja Madre or Mother of Ditch, depicts a water vampire sucking life from the surrounding desert. While Batman did copy the sculpture, the author argues it shouldn't matter unless the sculpture played a major role in the movie. The document provides information on copyright, what constitutes infringement, and penalties for being caught copying someone else's work without attribution.

2. TITLE AND CONTENT
Copyright
Top story versus
Top Story
My Opinion
The End

3. COPYRIGHT
Cannot copy without saying where you got it
If for student project you may use 10% of a website without site
Copyrighting is when you take someone else's work and call it
your own
Getting caught for copyright is punishable by suspension, being
arrested, being sued or even expulsion from school

4. TOP STORY
B AT M A N F O R E V E R T H E WAT E R VA M P I R E
Batman was Sued batman for the
accused of copy of the
copyright sculpture know as
infringement for Zanja Madre, or the
making 3-D Mother of Ditch.
reproductions of Which is portrayed
the radial rowers in Los Angeles as a
and for filming or water vampire
taking photos of sucking life water
the radial towers. from the
surrounding
dessert.

5. MY OPINION
Batman did indeed copy the sculpture but unless it had a major importance
in the movie then it shouldn’t matter.
It shouldn’t have mattered copy or not.

6. THE END
My info came from:
http://www.benedict.com/Visual/Batman/Batman.aspx