Municipality of CALENZANO - Florence beyond reception politics,  a stabilization model: costs and expediencies  about long-term solutions HOUSING & WELFARE Enrico Panzi Councellorship for Local Welfare & Housing Governance
Municipality of CALENZANO HOUSING & WELFARE
Municipality of CALENZANO HOUSING & WELFARE
Municipality of CALENZANO Town Council HOUSING & WELFARE Mayor: Mr. Alessio Biagioli Deputy Mayor: Mrs. Elena Papi the Aldermen
Municipality of CALENZANO 1) what we are talking about: lodgings for not-EU workers HOUSING & WELFARE
HOUSING & WELFARE 1) what we are talking about: lodgings for not-EU workers Municipality of CALENZANO
HOUSING & WELFARE 1) what we are talking about: lodgings for not-EU workers Municipality of CALENZANO
1) what we are talking about: lodgings for not-EU workers HOUSING & WELFARE 40 not-EU citizen  hosted in 12 flats three user typologies: singles, groups, family units lease standing:  3 years with right to renew covered area: 1000 sq.m. live square: 650 sq.m. low-energy consumption, based on district heating/cooling Municipality of CALENZANO
1) what we are talking about: lodgings for not-EU workers HOUSING & WELFARE total cost:  1,905,000 euro funding by Government of Tuscany: 654,000 euro funding by Efficient District project: 81,000 euro funding by Minister of Welfare and Labour: 200,000 euro remaining: 970,000 euro charged on Municipality balance 20-years mortgage at 3.50% = around 60,000 euro/year as refund Municipality of CALENZANO
2) how much spend the guests HOUSING & WELFARE preset lease: -25/30% compared to rent market i.e. around 7 euro/sq.m./month (utilities and apartment block are billed apart) = over  50,000 euro/year paid directly to Municipality Municipality of CALENZANO
3) how much spends the Municipality HOUSING & WELFARE running expense: administrative:  -4,000 euro/year generic:  -6,000 euro/year investments: 970.000 euro charged on Municipality balance 20-years mortgage at 3.50% -60,000 euro/year  as refund current receipts:   +50,000 euro/year  as lease Municipality of CALENZANO
HOUSING & WELFARE then intervention is  self-sustainable 3) how much spends the Municipality Municipality of CALENZANO
HOUSING & WELFARE then intervention is  (almost) self-sustainable 3) how much spends the Municipality Municipality of CALENZANO
HOUSING & WELFARE HOWEVER there are important  elements of criticalness then intervention is  (almost) self-sustainable 3) how much spends the Municipality Municipality of CALENZANO
4) criticalness of local welfare HOUSING & WELFARE this specific intervention  is self-sustainable just because  external fundings but for all the rest Municipalities cannot be  left alone (this sad rule applies always,  for every italian Municipality) Municipality of CALENZANO
HOUSING & WELFARE Calenzano: total population
HOUSING & WELFARE Calenzano: immigrant inhabitants
4) criticalness of local welfare HOUSING & WELFARE percentage of foreign inhabitants in our Municipality: around 6% of resident population percentage of foreign inhabitants in our local rankings related to social services, economic subsidies,  support for housing, help for school education: between 25 and 40% Municipality of CALENZANO
4) criticalness of local welfare HOUSING & WELFARE topics on immigration in Italy: income taxes drained towards Central Administration wealth on central Social Previdence balance greater pressure  on local social services contention  with vulnerable citizens for welfare access  = gain and  advantages  for Government agencies,  but pressure and  criticalness  on Municipalities Municipality of CALENZANO
4) criticalness of local welfare HOUSING & WELFARE topics on immigration in Italy: income taxes drained towards Central Administration wealth on central Social Previdence balance greater pressure  on local social services contention  with vulnerable citizens for welfare access   = gain and  advantages  for Government agencies,  but  pressure and  criticalness  on Municipalities Municipality of CALENZANO this is the italian  local welfare paradox
5) advantages of a solid welfare HOUSING & WELFARE instead, when resources come back from Central Administration to Municipalities, then the model works fine and  the paradigm turns  from  reception  to  stabilization stabilization issues: immigrants improve their personal life-project  they need less local welfare services remittances towards homelands go down in a long-term scenario, new citizen give back to Municipalities more of what they had had so finally  stability becomes opportunity for local communities Municipality of CALENZANO
5) advantages of a solid welfare HOUSING & WELFARE RECEPTION PHASE few available resources low capability of project managing costs and pressures dumped over Municipality high remittances towards homelands Municipality of CALENZANO
5) advantages of a solid welfare HOUSING & WELFARE RECEPTION PHASE few available resources low capability of project managing costs and pressures dumped over Municipality high remittances towards homelands STABILIZATION PHASE we need a more expensive startup we need a long-term vision but  we expect permanent advantages  on territories Municipality of CALENZANO
HOUSING & WELFARE then, to sum up: on short-term income taxes, previdence remittances social services and local welfare immigrant workers Municipality
HOUSING & WELFARE with a long-term stabilization model expenditures and wealth on nearby territory Municipality immigrant workers then, to sum up: on short-term income taxes, previdence remittances social services and local welfare Municipality immigrant workers some resources
Municipality of CALENZANO HOUSING & WELFARE Enrico Panzi Councellorship for Local Welfare & Housing Governance

Comune di Calenzano Inglese

  • 1.
    Municipality of CALENZANO- Florence beyond reception politics, a stabilization model: costs and expediencies about long-term solutions HOUSING & WELFARE Enrico Panzi Councellorship for Local Welfare & Housing Governance
  • 2.
    Municipality of CALENZANOHOUSING & WELFARE
  • 3.
    Municipality of CALENZANOHOUSING & WELFARE
  • 4.
    Municipality of CALENZANOTown Council HOUSING & WELFARE Mayor: Mr. Alessio Biagioli Deputy Mayor: Mrs. Elena Papi the Aldermen
  • 5.
    Municipality of CALENZANO1) what we are talking about: lodgings for not-EU workers HOUSING & WELFARE
  • 6.
    HOUSING & WELFARE1) what we are talking about: lodgings for not-EU workers Municipality of CALENZANO
  • 7.
    HOUSING & WELFARE1) what we are talking about: lodgings for not-EU workers Municipality of CALENZANO
  • 8.
    1) what weare talking about: lodgings for not-EU workers HOUSING & WELFARE 40 not-EU citizen hosted in 12 flats three user typologies: singles, groups, family units lease standing: 3 years with right to renew covered area: 1000 sq.m. live square: 650 sq.m. low-energy consumption, based on district heating/cooling Municipality of CALENZANO
  • 9.
    1) what weare talking about: lodgings for not-EU workers HOUSING & WELFARE total cost: 1,905,000 euro funding by Government of Tuscany: 654,000 euro funding by Efficient District project: 81,000 euro funding by Minister of Welfare and Labour: 200,000 euro remaining: 970,000 euro charged on Municipality balance 20-years mortgage at 3.50% = around 60,000 euro/year as refund Municipality of CALENZANO
  • 10.
    2) how muchspend the guests HOUSING & WELFARE preset lease: -25/30% compared to rent market i.e. around 7 euro/sq.m./month (utilities and apartment block are billed apart) = over 50,000 euro/year paid directly to Municipality Municipality of CALENZANO
  • 11.
    3) how muchspends the Municipality HOUSING & WELFARE running expense: administrative: -4,000 euro/year generic: -6,000 euro/year investments: 970.000 euro charged on Municipality balance 20-years mortgage at 3.50% -60,000 euro/year as refund current receipts: +50,000 euro/year as lease Municipality of CALENZANO
  • 12.
    HOUSING & WELFAREthen intervention is self-sustainable 3) how much spends the Municipality Municipality of CALENZANO
  • 13.
    HOUSING & WELFAREthen intervention is (almost) self-sustainable 3) how much spends the Municipality Municipality of CALENZANO
  • 14.
    HOUSING & WELFAREHOWEVER there are important elements of criticalness then intervention is (almost) self-sustainable 3) how much spends the Municipality Municipality of CALENZANO
  • 15.
    4) criticalness oflocal welfare HOUSING & WELFARE this specific intervention is self-sustainable just because external fundings but for all the rest Municipalities cannot be left alone (this sad rule applies always, for every italian Municipality) Municipality of CALENZANO
  • 16.
    HOUSING & WELFARECalenzano: total population
  • 17.
    HOUSING & WELFARECalenzano: immigrant inhabitants
  • 18.
    4) criticalness oflocal welfare HOUSING & WELFARE percentage of foreign inhabitants in our Municipality: around 6% of resident population percentage of foreign inhabitants in our local rankings related to social services, economic subsidies, support for housing, help for school education: between 25 and 40% Municipality of CALENZANO
  • 19.
    4) criticalness oflocal welfare HOUSING & WELFARE topics on immigration in Italy: income taxes drained towards Central Administration wealth on central Social Previdence balance greater pressure on local social services contention with vulnerable citizens for welfare access = gain and advantages for Government agencies, but pressure and criticalness on Municipalities Municipality of CALENZANO
  • 20.
    4) criticalness oflocal welfare HOUSING & WELFARE topics on immigration in Italy: income taxes drained towards Central Administration wealth on central Social Previdence balance greater pressure on local social services contention with vulnerable citizens for welfare access = gain and advantages for Government agencies, but pressure and criticalness on Municipalities Municipality of CALENZANO this is the italian local welfare paradox
  • 21.
    5) advantages ofa solid welfare HOUSING & WELFARE instead, when resources come back from Central Administration to Municipalities, then the model works fine and the paradigm turns from reception to stabilization stabilization issues: immigrants improve their personal life-project they need less local welfare services remittances towards homelands go down in a long-term scenario, new citizen give back to Municipalities more of what they had had so finally stability becomes opportunity for local communities Municipality of CALENZANO
  • 22.
    5) advantages ofa solid welfare HOUSING & WELFARE RECEPTION PHASE few available resources low capability of project managing costs and pressures dumped over Municipality high remittances towards homelands Municipality of CALENZANO
  • 23.
    5) advantages ofa solid welfare HOUSING & WELFARE RECEPTION PHASE few available resources low capability of project managing costs and pressures dumped over Municipality high remittances towards homelands STABILIZATION PHASE we need a more expensive startup we need a long-term vision but we expect permanent advantages on territories Municipality of CALENZANO
  • 24.
    HOUSING & WELFAREthen, to sum up: on short-term income taxes, previdence remittances social services and local welfare immigrant workers Municipality
  • 25.
    HOUSING & WELFAREwith a long-term stabilization model expenditures and wealth on nearby territory Municipality immigrant workers then, to sum up: on short-term income taxes, previdence remittances social services and local welfare Municipality immigrant workers some resources
  • 26.
    Municipality of CALENZANOHOUSING & WELFARE Enrico Panzi Councellorship for Local Welfare & Housing Governance