This document appears to be a performance review or evaluation of four individuals (Reta 1, Reta 2, Reta 3, Reta 4) across multiple criteria (AR1, AR2, AB, Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4). It shows their performance ratings for each criterion, with "ok" indicating satisfactory performance and "-" indicating room for improvement. The ratings suggest Reta 1 and Reta 3 met most criteria, while Reta 2 needed improvement on some criteria and Reta 4 was mixed but generally met expectations.

1. 1
 
 
 

2. 2
 

3. 3
 

4. 4
 

5. 5
 
 

6. 6

7. 7

8. 8

9. 9

10. 10

11. 11

12. 12

13. 13

14. 14

15. 15

16. 16

17. 17

18. 18

19. 19

20. 20

21. 21

22. 22
AR1 AR2 AB
Reta 1 ok ok ok
Reta 2 - - ok
Reta 3 ok - ok
Reta 4 - ok ok
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Reta 1 ok - ok -
Reta 2 ok - ok -
Reta 3 - ok - ok
Reta 4 - ok - ok