Patient-based learning made simple
Understanding the anatomy of a sports injury is the key to unlocking the diagnosis for most clinicians. Unfortunately, anatomy is often poorly taught, is not clinically focused and many anatomy textbooks are so complicated that searching for clinically useful information is difficult. In addition, multiple pathologies can present in an overlapping fashion, making the differentiation of the various possible causes of injury problematic.
Clinical Sports Anatomy classifies structures according to their anatomical reference points to form a diagnostic triangle. Discriminant questions are coupled with the more useful clinical tests and diagnostic manoeuvres to direct the reader toward a definitive clinical diagnosis. This approach is firmly rooted in evidence-based medicine and includes a list of the most appropriate investigations required to confirm diagnosis.
VIP Call Girls Pune Vrinda 9907093804 Short 1500 Night 6000 Best call girls S...
Clinical sports anatomy sample chapter
1. Chapter 5 THE GROIN TRIANGLE
1
Chronic groin pain is a common presentation in sports medicine practice. Studies
in professional sports have found groin injury the fourth most common injury
affecting soccer players,[1] the third most common injury in Australian rules
football,[2] and also has a high prevalence in ice hockey[3] and rugby.[4, 5]
This gives an incomplete portrayal however, as the morbidity attached to chronic
groin pain means it is behind only fracture and joint reconstruction in terms of lost
time from injury.[4, 5]
All these sports involve kicking and twisting movements whilst running. These
actions place strain on fascial and musculoskeletal structures that are fixed to a
number of bony anatomical points in close proximity. The resultant tissue damage
and/or entrapment of anatomical structures may cause pain.
This paper sets out a method based on patho-anatomic principles for a systematic
examination of the chronically painful groin, which enables the clinician to
discriminate more easily between pathological conditions and target their
investigation and subsequent management to specific diagnoses.
The specific anatomical landmarks and borders of the groin triangle are set out in
Figure 1.
Apex points of the groin triangle
The anatomical apex points of the triangle are as follows;
Anterior Superior Iliac Spine (ASIS)
Pubic Tubercle
3G point
From anthropometric measurements, the authors defined a new reference point at
the apex of the triangle. This point was termed the ‘3G point’ in reference to the
three-dimensional pathology and the groin, gluteal and greater trochanteric
regions. The relationship of this point in the anterior coronal plane was the mid
distance point between ASIS and the ssuperior pole of the patella, and in the
posterior coronal plane, double the distance from the spinous process of L5 lumbar
vertebrae to the ischial tuberosity in the line of the femur.
Figure 1 The Groin triangle
TFL= tensor fasciae latae, IlioPS= iliopsoas, Pec= pectinius, AL= adductor longus, Sar.= sartorius, Gr=
gracilis, RF= rectus femoris, VL= vastus lateralis, VM= vastus medialis, ASIS= anterior superior liac
spine, 3G= the 3 G point.
2. Chapter 5 THE GROIN TRIANGLE
2
Muscle Origin Insertion Nerve Root
Iliacus Inner surface of the iliac fossa Lesser trochanter of
femur
Femoral nerve
L2, L3
Psoas
Major and
Minor
Transverse processes L1-L5,
vertebral bodies of T12-L5 and
intervertebral discs
Lesser trochanter of
femur
Lumbar plexus
L1.L2,L3
Tensae
fascia latae
Anterior superior iliac crest Iliotibial band Superior gluteal
nerve
L4,L5,S1
Sartorius Anterior superior iliac spine Proximal antero-
medial tibia ( pes
anserine)
Femoral nerve
L2,L3
Rectus
femoris
Anterior head – anterior
inferior iliac spine
Posterior head – supra
acetabular groove
Tibial tuberosity Femoral nerve
L2,L3,L4
Vastus
lateralis
Lateral lip of linea aspera Tibial tuberosity Femoral nerve
L2,L3,L4
Vastus
intermedius
Antero lateral surface of femur Tibial tuberosity Femoral nerve
L2.L3.L4
Vastus
medialis
Inter trochanteric line Tibial tuberosity Femoral nerve
L2,L3.L4
Pectineus Pectineal line of superior pubic
ramus
Pectineal line of femur Femoral nerve
and/or obturator
nerve
L2,L3 and/or L2,3,4
Adductor
longus
Anterior surface of pubis
inferior to pubic tubercle
Middle third of linea
aspera
Obturator nerve
L2,L3,L4
Adductor
brevis
Body and inferior pubic ramus Proximal third of linea
aspera
Obturator nerve
L2,L3,L4
Gracilis Body and inferior pubic ramus Proximal antero-
medial tibia ( pes
anserinus)
Obturator nerve
L2,L3,L4
Adductor
Magnus
Anterior head- inferior pubic
ramus and ischial ramus
Posterior head – ischial
tuberosity
Anterior head – linea
aspera
Posterior head –
adductor tubercle of
femur
Anterior -
Obturator nerve
Posterior -
Sciatic nerve
L2,L3,L4
and L4,L5
3. Chapter 5 THE GROIN TRIANGLE
3
Movement
Hip Flexion Hip Lateral
rotation
Hip Medial
rotation
Hip Adduction Hip Abduction Knee Extension
Psoas Major Psoas Major Tensor fascia latae Adductor Magnus
Adductor longus
Adductor brevis
Sartorius
Gracilis
Tensor fascia latae Rectus femoris
Psoas Minor Psoas Minor Vastus lateralis
Iliacus Iliacus Vastus intermedius
Tensor fascia
latae
Vastus medialis
Gracilis
Superior border of the groin triangle
The line between the pubic tubercle and the ASIS forms the superior border of the
triangle. This corresponds to the anatomical position of the inguinal ligament, a
thickening of the aponeurosis of the external oblique muscle. Superior to the this
line, working from the pubic tubercle medially to the ASIS laterally the following
structures will be encountered;
Rectus abdominis and rectus abdominis sheath insertions
Internal oblique, external oblique, and transversus abdominis insertions
and aponeuroses.
Inguinal canal, medially the superficial inguinal ring and conjoint tendon,
more laterally the canal and further laterally the deep inguinal ring.
Ilioinguinal, iliohypogastric and genital branch of the genitofemoral nerve.
Conjoint tendon of Ilio-psoas as it passes under the lateral third of the
inguinal ligament
The visceral contents of the abdomen and pelvis
The insertion of rectus abdominis and its sheath are intimately related to the
aponeuroses of the obliques and transversus abdominis. The junction of where
these structures converge at the pubic bone revolves around the inguinal canal.
The internal inguinal ring is located at a point between the mid-inguinal point
(situated midway between the anterior superior iliac spine and the pubic
symphysis) and the midpoint of the inguinal ligament.[6]. The transversalis fascia,
and the conjoint tendon, a confluence of internal oblique and transversalis fasciae
form the posterior wall of the canal. The superficial inguinal ring, the opening in the
external oblique aponeurosis is situated a centimetre above and lateral to the
pubic tubercle. The anatomy of the ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric and genital
branch of the genitofemoral nerves is extremely variable, between them they
supply the skin of the lower abdomen, medial thigh and scrotum.[7]
Medial Border of the groin triangle
The line from the pubic tubercle to the 3G point inferiorly, forms the medial border
of the triangle. Though neither the medial or lateral borders of the triangle
comprise of a muscular line, in both instances they work to separate the clinically
important ‘groups’ of structures that lie on either side of them. Medial to the border
lie the adductor muscles, from superficial to deep
Adductor longus
Gracilis
Adductor brevis
Adductor magnus
The adductor longus and gracilis tendons are the most commonly affected and lie
in an almost continuous site of origin along the body of the pubis. The other
adductor muscles (brevis and magnus) arise more posterolaterally along the
inferior pubic ramus. The ramus forms a direct continuum between the pubic body
and the ischial tuberosity. The obturator nerve divides in the obturator canal (2-3
cm long canal situated in the anterosuperior aspect of the obturator foramen
containing the obturator nerve, artery, and vein) to anterior and posterior divisions.
The anterior branch innervates adductor longus, brevis, gracilis, and, occasionally
pectineus, it supplies sensory innervation to the skin and fascia of the inner distal
thirds of the medial thigh.[8]
Lateral Border of Triangle
The line from the ASIS superiorly to the 3G point forms the lateral border of the
triangle.
Femoro-acetabular joint
Trochanteric bursa
Tensor fasciae latae & Iliotibial band
4. Chapter 5 THE GROIN TRIANGLE
4
Though the surface marking of the femora-acetabular joint lies within the triangle,
pathology of the joint is usually referred to the greater trochanter, as such it is
considered in this section. Gluteal bursae underlie gluteus maximus and gluteus
medius tendons proximal to their insertions. The iliotibial band (ITB) or tract is a
lateral thickening of the fasciae latae in the thigh. Proximally it splits into superficial
and deep layers, enclosing tensor fasciae latae and anchoring this muscle to the
iliac crest.
Within the Triangle
Within the triangle the following structures are encountered;
Conjoint tendon of Iliopsoas muscle
Rectus femoris muscle
Femoral canal
Psoas arises as a series of slips each of which arise from the adjacent margins of
the vertebral bodies and the intervening discs from the lower border of T12 to the
upper border of L5. Iliacus arises from the upper two-thirds of the concavity of the
iliac fossa and the inner lip of the iliac crest, as well as the ventral sacro-iliac and
iliolumbar ligaments and the upper surface of the lateral part of the sacrum. The
two muscles converge and pass downwards and medially beneath the inguinal
ligament over the hip joint and into the lesser trochanter of the femur. The passage
of this conjoined tendon over the hip joint is facilitated by the iliopsoas bursa,
which is in some cases in direct communication with the hip joint. Rectus femoris
arises via a direct head from the anterior inferior iliac spine and a reflected head
arising from the superior acetabular rim and joint capsule. The femoral ring is the
base of the femoral canal. Its surface marking is medial to the femoral artery,
palpable at the mid-inguinal point. The femoral ring is bounded in front by the
inguinal ligament, behind by the pectineus, medially by the crescentic base of the
lacunar ligament, and laterally by the fibrous septum on the medial side of the
femoral vein.
Nerve entrapment,
The classic distribution of the cutaneous innervation of the area incorporated in the
triangle and their potential neuropathies is shown in figure 2; these however, must
serve as a guide only, as in vivo considerable variation occurs.[7, 9-12] The
clinician will appreciate that in addition to paraesthesias, a compressed nerve can
give rise to pain. The additional possibility of referred or radicular pain from T12,
L1, L2, and L3 must also be considered.
Figure 2 Nerve entrapment of the proximal lower limb
Gr= gracilis, VL= vastus lateralis, VM= vastus medialis, RF= rectus femoris, ASIS= anterior superior liac
spine, 3G= the 3 G point.
A patho-anatomic approach
The diagnostic process of history and examination is often abbreviated. There is a
growing tendency to rely on investigational studies as the initial diagnostic step
(e.g. proceeding to magnetic resonance imaging of a painful groin in the absence
of a clear differential diagnosis). The authors propose a four-step approach to the
diagnostic process emphasising history and examination and limiting investigation
to the final step as follows:
Step 1; Define & Align
Define the anatomical points and borders of the triangle on the patient (ASIS,
pubic tubercle, and 3G point).
5. Chapter 5 THE GROIN TRIANGLE
5
Step 2; Listen & Localise
Listen to the patient’s history and obtain as many localising factors as possible
then pinpoint the pain in relation to the groin triangle.
Step 3; Palpate & Re-create
Carefully palpate the identified area and determine which anatomical structures
are painful. The use of provocative manoeuvres/examinations (e.g. exercise) to re-
create the patient’s pain can be a critical diagnostic step. To describe all of the
manoeuvres in detail is beyond the scope of this text, readers are referred to
reviews on this topic. [13, 14]
Step 4; Alleviate & Investigate
Where a number of anatomical structures are in close proximity, clinical
presentations can be very similar. The manner in which pain can be removed may
be very helpful. A decrease in pain following abstinence from aggravating activity
is revealing. If a distinct structure can be identified, the elimination of symptoms
following guided injection of local anaesthetic into the structure is invaluable. The
authors recognise that a number of conditions discussed in this text may only be
diagnosed definitively following radiological investigation, in these instance the
most discriminative, evidence based investigation is recommended.
Specific scenarios using a problem oriented approach
The diagnostic stepwise approach using the groin triangle is summarized
in tables 1-5. The triangle is used to localise the pathology to a particular
area. We refer the reader to the specific table relating to that border of the
triangle. This provides a differential diagnosis, and clarifies the most
discriminative evidence based tests.
Pubic tubercle
Because many potentially anatomical structures converge at this point, we
propose a marking of the structure in similar fashion to a clock face (Fig.
3). This schematic representation of the anatomy of the area serves as a
guide to what may be palpable following invagination of the scrotum. The
examining clinician can therefore ‘walk their finger’ around the tubercle
assigning each part of the clock face to relevant attachment as highlighted
in Fig. 3. The authors recognise the variability of structures in this area,
having based diagrams on cadaveric studies performed prior to this
paper.[15] We have employed the term pubic bone stress injury for what is
often in the literature called ‘Osteitis Pubis’. We feel this is a better
reflection of the clinical picture in the absence of any evidence of an
inflammatory process.
The topic of incipient hernia is included as disorders of the posterior and
anterior inguinal walls. These are diagnoses of exclusion and, outside of
the most experienced hands, probably inseparable. These may represent
different ends of a spectrum of pathology in the area owing to differing
sporting activity.[3, 16-19]
Figure 3 The Pubic tubercle schematic
6. Chapter 5 THE GROIN TRIANGLE
6
Define &
Align
Pathology Listen & Localise Palpate & Recreate Alleviate & Investigate
Pubic
Tubercle
Adductor tendon
enthesopathy
Insidious onset, warms up
with exercise
Guarding on passive
abduction,[20]
weakness.[21] Pubic
‘Clock’; 6-8
Magnetic resonance
imaging ±
Gadolinium[22]
Rectus abdominis
enthesopathy
Well localised to insertion,
acute or insidious onset
Pain from resisted sit-
up.[21] Pubic ‘Clock’; 12
Magnetic resonance
imaging ± Gadolinium
[22]
Pubic bone stress injury Non-specific diminished
athletic performance, loss of
propulsive power
Bone tenderness
predominates[23, 24]
Diagnosis of exclusion
Plain film[24]Magnetic
resonance imaging[25]
Degenerative pubic
symphysis
Central pain, associated
with stress through
symphysis- stair climbing
Tender over symphysis.
Pubic ‘Clock’; 3
Plain film, stress
view,[26] Magnetic
resonance imaging[25]
Incipient hernia; conjoint
tendon tear
Insidious onset, diminished
performance, warms up.
Pain on resisted ‘torsion’ of
trunk ‘ipsilateral direction’.
[27] Pubic ‘Clock’; 11
Ultrasound[28]
Magnetic resosnance
imaging[29]
Confirmation by direct
vision at
arthroscopy,[18, 30, 31]
Incipient hernia; external
oblique aponeurosis tear
Acute onset, related to sport
specific movement eg ‘slap
shot’.[17]
.
Pain on resisted ‘torsion’ of
trunk ‘contralateral
direction’. [27]
Tenderness & dilation of
superficial inguinal ring on
invagination of scrotum.[16]
Pubic ‘Clock’; 12-1
Nerve entrapment;
Ilioinguinal nerve
Genitofemoral nerve
(genital branch)
Altered skin sensation
Post inguinal surgery?[32]
Superficial pain
hyper/dysaesthesia to skin
over pubis.[33]
Absence of muscular
component[10]
Relief of pain by
ultrasound-guided local
anaesthetic
infiltration[34]Nerve
conduction studies[7]
7. Chapter 5 THE GROIN TRIANGLE
7
Medial
Adductor longus pathology is the most common cause for pain in this area,
differentiation of enthesis-related problems from those at the musculi-
tendinous junction is important. The abnormal mechanics that arise due to
adductor dysfunction play a critical role in the generation of a chronic
pain/dysfunction cycle in the area.
Figure 4 Medial to the triangle
AL= adductor longus, AB= adductor brevis, AM= adductor magnus, S= sartorius, Gr= gracilis
8. Chapter 5 THE GROIN TRIANGLE
8
Table 2: Patho-anatomic approach; Medial to the groin triangle
Define &
Align
Pathology Listen & Localise Palpate & Recreate Alleviate & Investigate
Medial to
Triangle
Adductor/gracilis
enthesopathy
Insidious onset,
diminished
performance,
warms up
Proximal adductor pain, at
enthesis. Guarding,
weakness[20, 21]
Magnetic resonance
imaging ± Gadolinium [22]
Adductor longus pathology at
Musculotendinous junction
Acute onset, worse
during exercise.
Pain in proximal adductor.[21]
(2-4cm distal to enthesis),
guarding, weakness.[20, 21]
Magnetic resonance
imaging ± Gadolinium [22]
Pubic bone stress injury Pain primarily at
pubis radiating to
proximal thigh
Bone tenderness, lack of point
muscular tenderness
Magnetic resonance
imaging ± Gadolinium [22,
35]
Stress fracture inferior pubic
ramus
Insidious onset,
heavy training load
Hop test,[14] associated deep
buttock pain
Plain x-ray, Magnetic
resonance imaging[36]
Nerve Entrapment;
I. Obturator nerve
II. Ilioinguinal nerve
III. Genitofemoral nerve
(Genital branch)
Claudicant-type
pain of medial thigh
which settles on
resting[37]
Exercise-related adductor
weakness, superficial
dysesthesia of mid-medial
thigh[38]
Electromyography of
adductor longus[39]
Guided local anaesthetic
injection to obturator
foramen[40]
Altered skin
sensation
Post inguinal
surgery?
Dysaesthesia/ hyperaesthesia
over area of skin supplied by
nerve in question[32, 33]
Relief of pain by
ultrasound-guided local
anaesthetic infiltration[34]
Nerve conduction
studies[7]
External Iliac Artery
Endofibrosis
Thigh discomfort
post high-intensity
exercise mainly in
cyclists
Exercise related lower limb
weakness, Exercise-altered bruit
& Ankle/Brachial Index[41]
Doppler ultrasound[42]
Angiography[43]
9. Chapter 5 THE GROIN TRIANGLE
9
Superior
Rectus abdominis pathology tends to be well localised to its insertion at
the pubic tubercle, often making it the most clear-cut diagnosis in this area.
This may arise as a primary diagnosis, or develop secondary to pubic
overload originating from adductor or iliopsoas pathology.
Figure 5 Superior to the groin triangle
10. Chapter 5 THE GROIN TRIANGLE
10
Table 3: Patho-anatomic approach; Superior to the groin triangle
Define &
Align
Pathology Listen & Localise Palpate & Recreate Alleviate & Investigate
Superior
To Base
Rectus abdominis
Tendinopathy
Well localised to
insertion, acute or
insidious onset
Pain from resisted sit-up.[21, 44]
Pubic ‘Clock’; 12
Magnetic resonance
imaging ± Gadolinium [22]
Incipient hernia; conjoint
tendon tear
Insidious onset,
diminished
performance,
warms up.
Pain on resisted ‘torsion’ of trunk
‘ipsilateral direction’. [27] Pubic
‘Clock’; 11
Ultrasound[28]
Magnetic resosnance
imaging[29]
Confirmation by direct
vision at arthroscopy,[18,
30, 31]
Incipient hernia; external
oblique aponeurosis tear
Acute onset,
related to sport
specific movement
eg ‘slap shot’.[17]
.
Pain on resisted ‘torsion’ of trunk
‘contralateral direction’. [27]
Tenderness & dilation of superficial
inguinal ring on invagination of
scrotum.[16]
Pubic ‘Clock’; 12-1
Inguinal hernia Pain on Valsalva
manoeuvre
Cough impulse, palpable mass at
deep inguinal ring (direct), in inguinal
canal/scrotum (indirect)
Ultrasound[28]
Herniography,[45]
laparoscopy.
Nerve Entrapment;
Ilioinguinal nerve
Iliohypogastric nerve
Genitofemoral nerve
(genital branch)
Lateral femoral
cutaneous nerve
Altered skin
sensation
Dysaesthesia/ hyperaesthesia over
area of skin supplied by nerve in
question.[7, 10]
Relief of pain by
ultrasound-guided local
anaesthetic infiltration.[34]
Nerve conduction
studies[7]
11. Chapter 5 THE GROIN TRIANGLE
11
Lateral
As a cause of recalcitrant groin pain, pathology of the femoro-acetabular
joint should not be underestimated. The joint is prone to degenerative,
inflammatory and infective processes. The long-term contribution of acute
or repetitive trauma to the development of degenerative conditions such as
osteoarthritis is of particular concern in the sports setting.
Figure 6 Lateral to the groin triangle
TFL= tensor fasciae latae, VL= vastus lateralis, RF= rectus femoris
12. Chapter 5 THE GROIN TRIANGLE
12
Table 4: Patho-anatomic approach; Lateral to the groin triangle
Define &
Align
Pathology Listen & Localise Palpate & Recreate Alleviate & Investigate
Lateral to
Triangle
Impingement/Labral pathology,
Femoro-acetabular joint.
Mechanical signs,
clicking in joint and/or
catching
Impingement test[46] Magnetic resonance
imaging, Arthrogram[47]
Osteoarthritis/Chondral damage,
Femoro-acetabular joint;
History of traumatic/
congenital insult. Older
age group
Limited range of
movement,[48] pain on
weight bearing.
Plain film x-ray, Magnetic
resonance imaging[36]
Stress fracture Neck of Femur Heavy training load,
biomechanical/gait
abnormality
Hop test,[49] fulcrum
test[50]
Plain film x-ray, Magnetic
resonance imaging[36]
Trochanteric bursitis Persistant lateral hip pain
worse on lying on
affected side
Pain on transition
between
lying/standing[51]
Ultrasound,[52] Relief of
pain by ultrasound-guided
local anaesthetic injection
Iliotibial band friction syndrome External ‘Snapping’
and/or lateral knee pain
Recreate snapping,[53]
Ober’s test[14]
Ultrasound[52]
Nerve Entrapment; Lateral
Cutaneous Femoral nerve/
Meralgia paraesthetica
Exercise induced,
obesity[54]
Reproduction of
symptoms on pressure
inferior to anterior
superior iliac spine[54]
Nerve conduction studies[7]
13. Chapter 5 THE GROIN TRIANGLE
13
Within the triangle
Pathology of the iliopsoas muscle may cause pain that is referred in the
area superior to the triangle but the conjoint tendon is the most palpable
structure within the triangle when the hip is flexed. This is a common,
though under-diagnosed, cause of groin pain.[55] It is particularly prone to
irritation when overloaded secondary to dysfunction of other muscular
structures around the groin, such as the adductors.
Figure 7 Within the triangle
14. Chapter 5 THE GROIN TRIANGLE
14
Table 5: Patho-anatomic approach; Within the groin triangle
Define &
Align
Pathology Listen & Localise Palpate & Recreate Alleviate &
Investigate
Within the
triangle
Iliopsoas syndrome Pain above & below
inguinal ligament
Associated snapping
at hip joint.
Thomas test, modified[14] Ultrasound scan
dynamic view of
snapping[52] ±
injection[56]
Magnetic resonance
imaging.
Rectus femoris
tendinopathy/apophysitis
Does knee movement
affect pain?
Rectus Femoris contracture
test[57]
Plain x-ray,
Ultrasound scan,[52]
Magnetic resonance
imaging.
Femoral hernia Painful lump infero-
medial to pubic
tubercle
Minimal relationship to
exercise
Ultrasound scan,[28]
Herniography.[45]
Nerve entrapment;
Genitofemoral nerve (femoral
branch)
Medial femoral cutaneous
nerve
Altered skin sensation Dysaesthesia/ hyperaesthesia
over area of skin supplied by
nerve in question.[8]
Relief of pain by
local anaesthetic
infiltration[34]
Nerve conduction
studies[7]
15. Chapter 5 THE GROIN TRIANGLE
15
Intra-abdominal pathology
Discussion of this topic is beyond the scope of this paper, gastrointestinal
and genitourinary pathology may mask as groin discomfort or pain. Key
discriminating symptoms may be signs of systemic illness, systemic
inflammatory response and no correlation between exercise and
symptoms or signs. Any or all of the above in conjunction with a negative
musculoskeletal examination serve to alert the examining physician to
focus their examinations beyond the musculoskeletal system.
Case Histories
A 35-year-old woman presents with a 3-month history of groin pain. She
is nt usually active but had joined a ‘boot camp’ to lose some weight prior
to her symptom onset. She first noticed the pain after a particularly heavy
session which involved performing weighted sit-ups. She developed a
sharp pain in her groin. This was extremely sore but settled somewhat so
she was able to resume some training after a number of days. At this point
her symptoms gradually worsened and now she is unable to do any
abdominal work and even running hurts.
This is a presentation of groin pain, as such proceed to step 1, define and
align the groin triangle.
Define and align;
Expose the patient properly, a pair of sports shorts will allow physical
access and aid visibility.
Define the triangle: Locate the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS), locate
the pubic symphysis, mark the mid-point of the line between the ASIS and
superior pole of the patella (3G point).
Align the patient’s pain on the triangle. Here the pain is quite specific the
patient points to the area just above her pubic bone.
The patient has localised the pain to the area ‘superior to the triangle’.
From this point we recommend the reader attempt to exclude the potential
pathologies. From our table ‘superior to the triangle’ the potential causal
structures are:
16. Chapter 5 THE GROIN TRIANGLE
16
We proceed to differentiate between these structures, step 2.
Listen and localise:
Addressing the rectus abdominis muscle we ask:
o Is the pain well localised to above the pubic bone
(demonstrate where you mean)? Yes
Addressing an excipient hernia we ask:
o Does the pain have an insidious onset, does it occur
during and post exercise? No it began severely but it does
occur during exercise and stops a while after.
Addressing an inguinal hernia we ask:
o Do you experience pain when you ‘bear down’, for
example straining at stool, or lifting a heavy object? Not
initially but I have noticed that I do have pain when I lift
heavy things now.
Addressing neuropathy we ask:
o Have you noticed any abnormal sensation of the skin in
the area? No
This will narrow our differential diagnosis somewhat, and we proceed to
examination to narrow it further. By palpating painful structures, and
recreating the pain through diagnostic manoeuvres we move toward a
diagnosis, step 3.
Palpate & recreate:
From the pubic clock, pain at and around the 12pm position on the
‘pubic clock’ indicates pathology of the rectus abdominis muscle.
Incipient hernia is extremely uncommon in women, but the
external inguinal ring may be palpated superolateral to the pubic
tubercle at the 11 pm position.
A palpable mass in this area indicates a true inguinal hernia; here,
a cough impulse is helpful.
Normal superficial sensation in the area makes neuropathy
unlikely, but if you are unsure have the patient perform the
aggravating activity and re-examine post.
Given step 2 and the results of our palpation it is likely that this is a
rectus abdominus enthesopathy/insertion tear. A test to recreate
the pain is to have the patient ‘situp’ against resistance.
Recreation of pain is a positive test.
We may now proceed, if necessary, to confirm our clinical suspicion, step
4.
Alleviate & investigate
We may confirm our clinical suspicion via imaging. Ultrasonography is
effective but the most evidence-based test is MRI with or without the use
of gadolinium contrast.
17. Chapter 5 THE GROIN TRIANGLE
17
A 26 year-old soccer player presents with worsening ‘groin pain’ over the
previous 2 years. Interventions had included non-steroidal anti-
inflammatory drugs and simple analgesia. Pain developed after 20-30
minutes of activity and when sever would last until the next day. Heavy
training and running particularly game time aggravated the pain. The
player volunteered that rest was the only true relieving factor. The pain
was a non-specific ache but progressed to a sharp pinch when severe.
This is a presentation of groin pain, as such proceed to step 1, define and
align the groin triangle.
Define and align;
As in case 1 expose the patient appropriately and define the groin triangle
according to it’s bony landmarks.
Align the patient’s pain on the triangle:
The patient localises the pain to the area on the medial side of his leg,
sometimes radiating towards the knee.
This places the pain in the area medial to the triangle. From this point we
recommend the reader attempt to exclude the potential pathologies that
might be encountered in this region. From our table ‘medial to the triangle’
the potential causal structures are:
We proceed to differentiate between these structures, step 2.
Listen and localise:
Addressing the adductor/Gracilis muscle we ask;
o Did the pain come on gradually, and does it ease with
warming up? The answer is no
18. Chapter 5 THE GROIN TRIANGLE
18
o Did the pain come on suddenly and is it worse on
exercise? Yes that sounds right.
Addressing the pubic bone we ask:
o Has your training load increased over the last few months,
have you been doing more kicking than normal? No, I
have been at a two-week training camp but that was no
more intensive than my normal weekly training load.
o Is the pain at the pubic bone itself? No, the patient pointed
to the lateral border of the pubis, radiating down the inside
of the leg
Addressing neuropathy we ask:
o Have you noticed any abnormal sensation of the skin in
the area? No
o Have you had recent hernia or lower abdominal surgery?
No
o Does the pain take the form of a gripping pain settling with
rest? No
Addressing the Iliac artery we ask:
o Have you noticed the pain occurs particularly with intense
exercise and then ease with rest over 30 minutes or so?
No – The pain occurs with all activity.
This will narrow our differential diagnosis somewhat; nerve entrapment
and external iliac artery fibrosis are very unlikely. We proceed to
examination to narrow it further. By palpating painful structures, and
recreating the pain through diagnostic manoeuvres we move toward a
diagnosis, step 3.
Palpate & recreate:
The most evidence-based test for the adductor /Gracilis
enthesopathy is tenderness at the proximal enthesis of the
adductors, this can be differentiated from Adductor longus
pathology at the musculoskeletal junction as this is some 3-4 cm
distal to the enthesopathy of insertion. Guarding and adduction
weakness is seen with both pathologies.
Widespread bone tenderness over the pubic tubercle may indicate
pubic bone stress injury. Symptomatically this may be similar to a
stress fracture; (this is where the directed questioning should have
hinted at stress fracture) the later is however, usually more inferior
and posterior. An inferior ischial ramus fracture will usually
however have a positive Hop test – where the patient is asked to
hop on one leg and this exacerbates the pain with radiation to the
buttock can be of help here
Palpation of the area indicates pain along the adductor longus
muscle and tendon. The point of maximal tenderness is slightly
distal to the enthesis rather than directly at it.
Given our suspicion following questioning and findings on examination we
may proceed to step 4.
Alleviate and Investigate.
We may need no further investigation at this point. A careful rehabilitation
programme with appropriate initial conservative management should result
in steady improvement with a general and then sport specific return to
activity. If imaging confirmation were required both ultrasound imaging and
magnetic resonance imaging would demonstrate the musculo-tendinous
junction well.
19. Chapter 5 THE GROIN TRIANGLE
19
A 26 year-old rugby union player presents with worsening ‘groin pain’
over the previous 2 years. Interventions had included non-steroidal anti-
inflammatory drugs and simple analgesia. Pain developed after 20-30
minutes of activity and when sever would last until the next day. Heavy
training and running particularly game time aggravated the pain. The
player volunteered that rest was the only true relieving factor. The pain
was a non-specific ache but progressed to a sharp pinch when severe.
This is a presentation of groin pain, as such proceed to step 1, define and
align the groin triangle.
Define and align;
As in case 1 expose the patient appropriately and define the groin triangle
according to it’s bony landmarks.
Align the patient’s pain on the triangle. Here it is a non-specific pain. In an
effort to localise the pain, ask the patient to point to where the pain is with
one finger.
The patient localises the pain to within the triangle. From this point we
recommend the reader attempt to exclude the potential pathologies. From
our table ‘within the triangle’ the potential causal structures are:
We proceed to differentiate between these structures, step 2.
Listen and localise:
Addressing the psoas muscle we ask;
o Is there pain above & below inguinal ligament? Yes there
is
o Is there associated snapping at hip joint? Maybe, it
sometimes clicks a little.
Addressing rectus femoris tendinopathy/apophysitis we ask:
o Does knee movement affect pain? No. This patient is too
old for an apophysitis, but rectus femoris strain would
20. Chapter 5 THE GROIN TRIANGLE
20
have to be differentiated from iliopsoas as they both act as
hip flexors.
Addressing femoral hernia we ask:
o Is there a painful lump infero-medial to pubic tubercle? No
Addressing neuropathy we ask:
o Have you noticed any abnormal sensation of the skin in
the area? No
This will narrow our differential diagnosis somewhat, and we proceed to
examination to narrow it further. By palpating painful structures, and
recreating the pain through diagnostic manoeuvres we move toward a
diagnosis, step 3.
Palpate & recreate:
The most evidence-based test for the iliopsoas strain is a modified
Thomas test, fig. 1. Stand a patient at the end of the examination
table so the buttocks are resting at it’s edge, They then take the
knee of the unaffected leg in their hands and lie back onto the
table. The examiner ensures the hip of the unaffected side is fully
flexed while extending the affected side. Pain is experienced
above and below the inguinal ligament.
Fig. 1: modified Thomas test.
< ? insert picture from B & K?>
To differentiate from a rectus femoris pathology one must
remember the anatomy of this muscle. Travelling from the AIIS
(anterior inferior iliac spine) to the tibial tuberosity it spans both the
hip and knee. If knee movement alters pain at the hip it suggests
pathology of this muscle. This is best tested with the Rectus
Femoris contracture test, fig. 2. With the patient lying prone, the
knee is fully flexed. Pathology of the rectus femoris will cause it to
shorten; this is accommodated by involuntary flexion at the hip,
indicating a positive test.
Fig. 2: Rectus Femoris contracture test.
< ? insert picture from B & K?>
Both of these tests are negative. Palpation for any painful masses
inferomedial to the pubic tubercle is negative and sensation in the
area is intact.
Revisit your diagnosis
Returning to our anatomy, one structure that lies both within the triangle
and lateral to it, is the femoro-acetabular joint. This has been categorised
as lateral to the triangle to draw the reader to the greater trochanter
triangle. This deals in depth with the hip joint and structures around it.
Femoro-acetabular pathology which often presents as groin pain, may
result in a loss of range of movement at the hip. In a situation such as
damage to the acetabular labrum, however, loss of movement may be
subtle. Given the nature of the presentation to date and the findings on
examination we move to the lateral section of the triangle.
Listen and localise;
Addressing the hip joint we ask the question:
o Have you noticed any clicking in your hip joint and/or
catching? Yes I noticed it clicks sometimes.
Palpate and recreate;
o A discriminative test is the impingement test Fig 3. The hip is
flexed fully, adducted and internal rotation is added. This
correlates very well with labral injury.
21. Chapter 5 THE GROIN TRIANGLE
21
Figure 3. The hip impingement test.
< ? insert picture from B & K?>
At this point we may proceed to confirm our clinical suspicion, step 4.
Alleviate and Investigate.
A plain film x-ray of the hip may identify some abnormal femoral head neck
offset, or acetabular dysplasia. Both features indicate femoro-acetabular
impingement, which may cause labral injury. Where this is not present we
proceed to an MRI or MR arthrography of the hip to confirm our clinical
suspicion of an acetabular labral injury.
Summary
Securing a diagnosis is the obvious first step in the treatment of any
problem. Groin pain is often insidious in onset so it is often chronic when
the athlete presents. An anatomically crowded area can make
differentiation between structures difficult. This can be further complicated
by an overload pattern forcing other structures to bear more than their
normal workload. They will, if the underlying cause is not addressed,
themselves become inflamed and painful.
Do not be afraid to consider a number of pathologies as the causal agent
in chronic groin pain. The greater the chronicity the more likely multiple
pathologies are. As is illustrated in case 3 we must be prepared to revisit
the diagnosis and shape our differential diagnosis according to the
symptoms and signs which become apparent.
22. Chapter 5 THE GROIN TRIANGLE
22
References
[1] Walden M, Hagglund M, Ekstrand J. Football injuries during European Championships
2004-2005. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007 Mar 21.
[2] Orchard J, Seward H. Epidemiology of injuries in the Australian Football League, seasons
1997-2000. British journal of sports medicine. 2002 Feb;36(1):39-44.
[3] Emery CA, Meeuwisse WH, Powell JW. Groin and abdominal strain injuries in the
National Hockey League. Clin J Sport Med. 1999 Jul;9(3):151-6.
[4] Brooks JH, Fuller CW, Kemp SP, Reddin DB. Epidemiology of injuries in English
professional rugby union: part 2 training Injuries. British journal of sports medicine. 2005
Oct;39(10):767-75.
[5] Brooks JH, Fuller CW, Kemp SP, Reddin DB. Epidemiology of injuries in English
professional rugby union: part 1 match injuries. British journal of sports medicine. 2005
Oct;39(10):757-66.
[6] Koliyadan SV, Narayan G, Balasekran P. Surface marking of the deep inguinal ring.
Clinical anatomy (New York, NY. 2004 Oct;17(7):554-7.
[7] Rab M, Ebmer And J, Dellon AL. Anatomic variability of the ilioinguinal and
genitofemoral nerve: implications for the treatment of groin pain. Plastic and reconstructive surgery.
2001 Nov;108(6):1618-23.
[8] McCrory P, Bell S, Bradshaw C. Nerve entrapments of the lower leg, ankle and foot in
sport. Sports medicine (Auckland, NZ. 2002;32(6):371-91.
[9] Krahenbuhl L, Striffeler H, Baer HU, Buchler MW. Retroperitoneal endoscopic
neurectomy for nerve entrapment after hernia repair. The British journal of surgery. 1997
Feb;84(2):216-9.
[10] Lee CH, Dellon AL. Surgical management of groin pain of neural origin. Journal of the
American College of Surgeons. 2000 Aug;191(2):137-42.
[11] Morikawa R. [Distribution and variations of the nerves deriving from the lumbar plexus and
supplying the abdominal wall]. Kaibogaku zasshi. 1971 Oct;46(5):312-38.
[12] Starling JR, Harms BA. Diagnosis and treatment of genitofemoral and ilioinguinal
neuralgia. World journal of surgery. 1989 Sep-Oct;13(5):586-91.
[13] Brukner PD, Khan KM. Clinical Sports Medicine. 3 ed. Sydney: McGraw Hill 2006.
[14] Malanga GA, Nadler SF. Physical Examination of the hip. Muscloskeletal Physical
Examination, An Evidence-Based Approach. Philedlphia, PA: Elsevier Mosby 2006:251-79.
[15] Franklin-Miller A, Falvey EC, McCrory P, Briggs C. Landmarks for the 3G approach;
Groin, Gluteal, and Greater trochanter triangles, a pathoanatomical method in sports medicine.
Submitted. 2007.
[16] Gilmore J. Groin pain in the soccer athlete: fact, fiction, and treatment. Clinics in sports
medicine. 1998 Oct;17(4):787-93, vii.
[17] Irshad K, Feldman LS, Lavoie C, Lacroix VJ, Mulder DS, Brown RA. Operative
management of "hockey groin syndrome": 12 years of experience in National Hockey League players.
Surgery. 2001 Oct;130(4):759-64; discussion 64-6.
[18] Kluin J, den Hoed PT, van Linschoten R, JC IJ, van Steensel CJ. Endoscopic evaluation and
treatment of groin pain in the athlete. Am J Sports Med. 2004 Jun;32(4):944-9.
[19] Lovell G. The diagnosis of chronic groin pain in athletes: a review of 189 cases. Australian
journal of science and medicine in sport. 1995 Sep;27(3):76-9.
[20] Kendall FP ME. Lower extremity muscles. In: Kendall FP ME, ed. Muscles - testing and
function: Williams and Wilkins 1983:158-79.
[21] Holmich P, Holmich LR, Bjerg AM. Clinical examination of athletes with groin pain: an
intraobserver and interobserver reliability study. British journal of sports medicine. 2004
Aug;38(4):446-51.
[22] Robinson P, Barron DA, Parsons W, Grainger AJ, Schilders EM, O'Connor PJ. Adductor-
related groin pain in athletes: correlation of MR imaging with clinical findings. Skeletal radiology.
2004 Aug;33(8):451-7.
[23] Lynch SA, Renstrom PA. Groin injuries in sport: treatment strategies. Sports medicine
(Auckland, NZ. 1999 Aug;28(2):137-44.
[24] Fricker PA, Taunton JE, Ammann W. Osteitis pubis in athletes. Infection, inflammation or
injury? Sports medicine (Auckland, NZ. 1991 Oct;12(4):266-79.
[25] Lovell G, Galloway H, Hopkins W, Harvey A. Osteitis pubis and assessment of bone
marrow edema at the pubic symphysis with MRI in an elite junior male soccer squad. Clin J Sport
Med. 2006 Mar;16(2):117-22.
[26] LaBan MM, Meerschaert JR, Taylor RS, Tabor HD. Symphyseal and sacroiliac joint pain
associated with pubic symphysis instability. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 1978
Oct;59(10):470-2.
[27] Kumar S. Ergonomics and biology of spinal rotation. Ergonomics. 2004 Mar 15;47(4):370-
415.
[28] van den Berg JC, Rutten MJ, de Valois JC, Jansen JB, Rosenbusch G. Masses and pain in
the groin: a review of imaging findings. European radiology. 1998;8(6):911-21.
[29] Nelson EN, Kassarjian A, Palmer WE. MR imaging of sports-related groin pain. Magnetic
resonance imaging clinics of North America. 2005 Nov;13(4):727-42.
[30] Kumar A, Doran J, Batt ME, Nguyen-Van-Tam JS, Beckingham IJ. Results of inguinal
canal repair in athletes with sports hernia. Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh.
2002 Jun;47(3):561-5.
[31] Steele P, Annear P, Grove JR. Surgery for posterior inguinal wall deficiency in athletes.
Journal of science and medicine in sport / Sports Medicine Australia. 2004 Dec;7(4):415-21;
discussion 22-3.
[32] Liszka TG, Dellon AL, Manson PN. Iliohypogastric nerve entrapment following
abdominoplasty. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 1994 Jan;93(1):181-4.
[33] Harms BA, DeHaas DR, Jr., Starling JR. Diagnosis and management of genitofemoral
neuralgia. Arch Surg. 1984 Mar;119(3):339-41.
[34] Eichenberger U, Greher M, Kirchmair L, Curatolo M, Moriggl B. Ultrasound-guided blocks
of the ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerve: accuracy of a selective new technique confirmed by
anatomical dissection. British journal of anaesthesia. 2006 Aug;97(2):238-43.
23. Chapter 5 THE GROIN TRIANGLE
23
[35] Verrall GM, Slavotinek JP, Barnes PG, Fon GT, Esterman A. Assessment of physical
examination and magnetic resonance imaging findings of hamstring injury as predictors for recurrent
injury. The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy. 2006 Apr;36(4):215-24.
[36] Berger FH, de Jonge MC, Maas M. Stress fractures in the lower extremity. The importance
of increasing awareness amongst radiologists. European journal of radiology. 2007 Apr;62(1):16-26.
[37] Bradshaw C, McCrory P, Bell S, Brukner P. Obturator nerve entrapment. A cause of groin
pain in athletes. Am J Sports Med. 1997 May-Jun;25(3):402-8.
[38] Bradshaw C, McCrory P. Obturator nerve entrapment. Clin J Sport Med. 1997 Jul;7(3):217-
9.
[39] Delagi E, Perotto A. Anatomic Guide for the Electromyographer. 2nd ed. Springfield:
Charles C Thomas Publishers 1980.
[40] Magora F, Rozin R, Ben-Menachem Y, Magora A. Obturator nerve block: an evaluation of
technique. British journal of anaesthesia. 1969 Aug;41(8):695-8.
[41] Abraham P, Bickert S, Vielle B, Chevalier JM, Saumet JL. Pressure measurements at rest
and after heavy exercise to detect moderate arterial lesions in athletes. J Vasc Surg. 2001
Apr;33(4):721-7.
[42] Abraham P, Leftheriotis G, Bourre Y, Chevalier JM, Saumet JL. Echography of external
iliac artery endofibrosis in cyclists. Am J Sports Med. 1993 Nov-Dec;21(6):861-3.
[43] Abraham P, Chevalier JM, Saumet JL. External iliac artery endofibrosis: a 40-year course.
The Journal of sports medicine and physical fitness. 1997 Dec;37(4):297-300.
[44] Meyers WC, Foley DP, Garrett WE, Lohnes JH, Mandlebaum BR. Management of severe
lower abdominal or inguinal pain in high-performance athletes. PAIN (Performing Athletes with
Abdominal or Inguinal Neuromuscular Pain Study Group). Am J Sports Med. 2000 Jan-Feb;28(1):2-8.
[45] Garner JP, Patel S, Glaves J, Ravi K. Is herniography useful? Hernia. 2006 Mar;10(1):66-9.
[46] Ganz R, Parvizi J, Beck M, Leunig M, Notzli H, Siebenrock KA. Femoroacetabular
impingement: a cause for osteoarthritis of the hip. Clinical orthopaedics and related research. 2003
Dec(417):112-20.
[47] Leunig M, Podeszwa D, Beck M, Werlen S, Ganz R. Magnetic resonance arthrography of
labral disorders in hips with dysplasia and impingement. Clinical orthopaedics and related research.
2004 Jan(418):74-80.
[48] Birrell F, Croft P, Cooper C, Hosie G, Macfarlane G, Silman A. Predicting radiographic hip
osteoarthritis from range of movement. Rheumatology (Oxford, England). 2001 May;40(5):506-12.
[49] Monteleone GP, Jr. Stress fractures in the athlete. The Orthopedic clinics of North America.
1995 Jul;26(3):423-32.
[50] Johnson AW, Weiss CB, Jr., Wheeler DL. Stress fractures of the femoral shaft in athletes--
more common than expected. A new clinical test. Am J Sports Med. 1994 Mar-Apr;22(2):248-56.
[51] Bird PA, Oakley SP, Shnier R, Kirkham BW. Prospective evaluation of magnetic resonance
imaging and physical examination findings in patients with greater trochanteric pain syndrome.
Arthritis and rheumatism. 2001 Sep;44(9):2138-45.
[52] Allen GM, Wilson DJ. Ultrasound in sports medicine--a critical evaluation. European
journal of radiology. 2007 Apr;62(1):79-85.
[53] Brignall CG, Brown RM, Stainsby GD. Fibrosis of the gluteus maximus as a cause of
snapping hip. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993 Jun;75(6):909-10.
[54] Seror P, Seror R. Meralgia paresthetica: clinical and electrophysiological diagnosis in 120
cases. Muscle & nerve. 2006 May;33(5):650-4.
[55] Holmich P. Long-standing groin pain in sportspeople falls into three primary patterns - a
'clinical entity' approach: Prospective study of 207 patients. British journal of sports medicine. 2007
Jan 29.
[56] Adler RS, Buly R, Ambrose R, Sculco T. Diagnostic and therapeutic use of sonography-
guided iliopsoas peritendinous injections. Ajr. 2005 Oct;185(4):940-3.
[57] Magee D. Orthopedic Physical Examination. 4th ed. Philedelphia: WB Saunders 2002.