City CouncilOctober 18, 2011
Discussion Item โ€“ Front Yard ParkingRequested by Council members Adams & Alexander;Discussed in December of 2003;Discussed in October of 2009;Discussed in May of 2011;
Purpose of DiscussionGet thoughts of Council;Determine if/how issue should be addressed; andObtain direction for ordinance.
Rationale Behind RegulationsAppearance of blight;Clear delineation between parking areas and yards;Prevents growth of ground cover;Reduces openness;Blocks sight lines for vehicular traffic;Obstructs access for emergency vehicles;Diminishes quality of neighborhoods;
May 2011 DiscussionBasically prohibited parking with the following exceptions:Parking screened from public view with a fence or wall 6โ€™ in height;Parking in a rear yard not adjacent to a street right-of-way;Residential lots on streets 30โ€™ wide or narrower;Parking of a vehicle with a valid handicapped license plate or mirror hanger;On an improved surface;For six months after the passage of the ordinance.
Todayโ€™s DiscussionProhibition of parking in all front yards, with the following exceptions:Parking screened from public view with a fence or wall 6โ€™ in height;Vehicles parked on an improved surface;Residential lots fronting onto street rights-of-way which have less than 36โ€™ of pavement width;Street rights-of-way defined in the Master Thoroughfare Plan as minor arterial, major arterial, minor collector, major collector; and For one year after the passage of the ordinance.
Proposed Definition of Improved Surfacehot mix over an appropriate base material;ย two-course penetration (two layers of crushed stone and asphalt);ย reinforced concrete;ย interlocking concrete paving stones over an appropriate base; orย compacted gravel, caliche or crushed rock with a minimum depth.

City Council October 18, 2011 Planning Presentation

  • 1.
  • 2.
    Discussion Item โ€“Front Yard ParkingRequested by Council members Adams & Alexander;Discussed in December of 2003;Discussed in October of 2009;Discussed in May of 2011;
  • 3.
    Purpose of DiscussionGetthoughts of Council;Determine if/how issue should be addressed; andObtain direction for ordinance.
  • 4.
    Rationale Behind RegulationsAppearanceof blight;Clear delineation between parking areas and yards;Prevents growth of ground cover;Reduces openness;Blocks sight lines for vehicular traffic;Obstructs access for emergency vehicles;Diminishes quality of neighborhoods;
  • 5.
    May 2011 DiscussionBasicallyprohibited parking with the following exceptions:Parking screened from public view with a fence or wall 6โ€™ in height;Parking in a rear yard not adjacent to a street right-of-way;Residential lots on streets 30โ€™ wide or narrower;Parking of a vehicle with a valid handicapped license plate or mirror hanger;On an improved surface;For six months after the passage of the ordinance.
  • 6.
    Todayโ€™s DiscussionProhibition ofparking in all front yards, with the following exceptions:Parking screened from public view with a fence or wall 6โ€™ in height;Vehicles parked on an improved surface;Residential lots fronting onto street rights-of-way which have less than 36โ€™ of pavement width;Street rights-of-way defined in the Master Thoroughfare Plan as minor arterial, major arterial, minor collector, major collector; and For one year after the passage of the ordinance.
  • 7.
    Proposed Definition ofImproved Surfacehot mix over an appropriate base material;ย two-course penetration (two layers of crushed stone and asphalt);ย reinforced concrete;ย interlocking concrete paving stones over an appropriate base; orย compacted gravel, caliche or crushed rock with a minimum depth.