The document summarizes a court case involving the Illinois Fraudulent Transfer Act. It discusses how the Act allows creditors to recover assets that debtors have transferred to avoid paying a debt or judgment. In the case, a bank obtained a $4.3 million judgment against a defendant but then the defendant transferred millions in property to his sister. The bank sued under the Act and the court found that the bank had sufficiently alleged that the transfers were made to avoid paying the debt, violating the Act. The ruling shows how aggressively pursuing post-judgment collection efforts can help creditors recover assets debtors try to hide or transfer away.
A primer on the complex issues surrounding immigration consequences of criminal convictions. VERY important for attorneys in order to avoid charges of ineffective assistance of counsel! This was presented as a CLE for the Criminal Section of the Minnesota Bar Association.
Our office provides opinion letters to attorneys to keep their criminal practice from becoming malpractice.
Thanks for reading!
Chaudhary Law Office, PLLC
Minneapolis, Minnesota Immigration Attorneys Lawyers
5010 Flour Exchange Building
310 Fourth Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55415
(612) 206-3721
satveer@chaudharylawoffice.com
Presentations from the Charleston Trident Association of REALTORS 2011 Midyear Market Update.
Includes:
Economic and Real Estate Trends by Dr. Joseph Von Nessen
Mortgage Lending Update by Mikell Richards
Foreclosure Update (Charleston County) by Judge Mikell Scarborough
A primer on the complex issues surrounding immigration consequences of criminal convictions. VERY important for attorneys in order to avoid charges of ineffective assistance of counsel! This was presented as a CLE for the Criminal Section of the Minnesota Bar Association.
Our office provides opinion letters to attorneys to keep their criminal practice from becoming malpractice.
Thanks for reading!
Chaudhary Law Office, PLLC
Minneapolis, Minnesota Immigration Attorneys Lawyers
5010 Flour Exchange Building
310 Fourth Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55415
(612) 206-3721
satveer@chaudharylawoffice.com
Presentations from the Charleston Trident Association of REALTORS 2011 Midyear Market Update.
Includes:
Economic and Real Estate Trends by Dr. Joseph Von Nessen
Mortgage Lending Update by Mikell Richards
Foreclosure Update (Charleston County) by Judge Mikell Scarborough
Abetment and Criminal Conspiracy under English and Indian lawNishkaPrajapati
1. Explain the provisions relating to abetment in English and Indian law.
2. Proof of conspiracy and its admissibility.
3. Difference between abetment and conspiracy.
4. Sections 34, 109 and 120-A.
Abetment and Criminal Conspiracy under English and Indian lawNishkaPrajapati
1. Explain the provisions relating to abetment in English and Indian law.
2. Proof of conspiracy and its admissibility.
3. Difference between abetment and conspiracy.
4. Sections 34, 109 and 120-A.
Powerpoint presentationDeliverable Length 5 - 7 slides with .docxChantellPantoja184
Powerpoint presentation
Deliverable Length: 5 - 7 slides with speaker notes of 200 - 250 words per slide (excluding Title and Reference slides) APA FORMAT
You, as a HR Generalist, have been asked by your HR Director for your recommendations in terms of what tools your organization could use to better manage the talents of your employees. This will help to develop policies and procedures in managing your human capital. Please develop a PowerPoint presentation to your Director addressing the following:
· Describe and analyze the broad range of talent management efforts that use software applications to help you Director to make an educated decision.
· Give some examples of firms that have successfully used these applications.
· Describe how these efforts are useful in terms of strategic human capital management.
Page | 1
Plaintiff in Pro Se,
ClearChoice Community Services Inc.
2736 Lyndale Ave S Suit e202
Minneapolis MN 55408
Telephone No.9522220251
STATE OF MINNESOTA
DISTRICT COURT
County of Hennepin
Judicial District:
Court File number:
Case Type:
ClearChoice Community Services Inc.
Plaintiff Pro Se
V
Caskecla Investment
THEODORE J MEYERS
JOHN DOE I-XX, et al.
Defendants
PARTIES TO THE ACTION
1. Plaintiff Pro se, ClearChoice Community Services Inc. (herein referred as Borrower/Plaintiffs) all times relevant have resided at 4816 Nicollet Ave S Minneapolis MN 55419
2. Defendant Caskecla Investment (herein after refreed to as Lender) having its place of business at 8271 SE Sanctuary Drive, Hobe Sound FL 33455
3. Defendant THEODORE J. MEYERS having its place of business at 1755 St. Marys Street lcon Heights MN 55113
4. Any allegations about acts of any corporate or other business of Defendants means that the corporation or other business did the alleged acts through its officers, directors, employees, agents and/or representatives while they were acting within the actual or ostensible scope of their authority.
5. At all relevant times, each Defendant committed acts, caused or directed others to commit the acts, or permitted others to commit the acts alleged in this Complaint; additionally, some of the Defendants acted as the agent for other Defendants, and all of the Defendants in connivance with each other acted within the scope of their agency as if acting as the agent of another.
6. Knowing or realizing that other Defendants were engaging in or planning to engage in unlawful conduct, each Defendant nevertheless cilitated the commission of those unlawful acts.
7. Each Defendant intended to and did encourage, cilitate or assist in the commission of the unlawful acts, and thereby aided and abetted the other Defendants in the unlawful conduct.
I. CTUAL BACKGROUND:
(a) In the present case, the Deed of Trust for the Property listed the borrower, as "ClearChoice Community Services Inc.," and listed the Lender, as "Caskecla Investment, “ The Caskecla Investment, was renamed Caskecla Investment and later on was clo.
Defending Against Bankruptcy Avoidance Actions (Series: Complex Financial Lit...Financial Poise
In the event of a bankruptcy, the debtor or trustee may opt to take legal action in order to recover money or property that was transferred by the debtor prior to going bankrupt. These actions, whereby such transfers are effectively reversed, are referred to as “avoidance actions.” In this webinar, the expert panel discusses the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code, common avoidance actions, and key considerations when planning for and defending against these actions.
To listen to this webinar on-demand, go to: https://www.financialpoise.com/financial-poise-webinars/defending-against-bankruptcy-avoidance-actions-2020/
John Darer of 4Structures in Stamford, CTJohn Darer
John Darer of 4Structures in Stamford, CT is an AM Best Recommended Structured Settlement Expert, Sudden Money® Advisor, Settlement Planner, Watchdog. John Darer is a well-known highly skilled creative structured settlement expert, Certified Financial Transitionist, Registered Settlement Planner, licensed insurance agent, listener, communicator, thought leader and problem solver.
Types of Mortgages in Housing loan & the rights of the lenderPratistha Mishra
Types of Mortgages that are provided by the lenders in Housing Loan & what the rights of the Mortgagor & Mortgagee along with it what are the essentials of each type of mortgage.
Case Study : Business Law I Essay
Unit 2 Business Law Essay
Business Law
Business Law Essay
Business Law: Case Study Questions And Answers
The Business Law Short Essay
Business Law Essay
Business Law
Business Law Questions and Answers
Business Law and Ethics Essay
Business Law Essay
Business Law
Business Law Essay
Business Law Essay
Common Law Vs Civil Law Essay
Business Law
Business Law Essay
Business Law Essay
Business Law
The annual Legal Seminar For Credit Professionals, presented by Kegler Brown in conjunction with NACM – Great Lakes Region and American Subcontractors Association, was combined with an international business and construction legal program. Topics included selling internationally, post-judgment collection, bankruptcy, bids and pay-if-paid clauses.
Similar to Chicago Daily Law Bulletin - 7.29.15 Fraudulent Transfer Act - Pleading Requirements (20)
Law360 featured a fraud and civil conspiracy case we're handling for the defense. The Judge granted in part and denied in part our motion to dismiss but the case is noteworthy for its analysis of the conversion tort as applied to money and when an LLC is an indispensable party to a suit implicating LLC interests.
Our firm's developer client recently defeated a motion to dismiss a breach of contract suit stemming from faulty architectural plans involving Aspen, CO property. The Court provides a thorough and well-reasoned analysis of specific jurisdiction, minimum contacts test and Illinois' long-arm statute.
Recent opinion where our firm's land developer client defeated motion to dismiss breach of contract and architectural malpractice claim involving Aspen, CO real estate.
Our firm recently defeated a Defendants' Rule 12(b)(2) motion to dismiss in an architectural design dispute affecting Aspen, CO property. The Northern District provides a trenchant and thorough analysis of the key factors comprising minimum contacts test when deciding whether an out-of-state corporate defendant is subject to specific jurisdiction under the Ill. long-arm statute. Case remains pending.
Recent Appellate court victory our firm earned on behalf of its client. Case was a breach of contract and fraud case stemming from a failed real estate venture in Chicago's River North neighborhood. Post-judgment proceedings are pending.
Chicago Daily Law Bulletin - 7.29.15 Fraudulent Transfer Act - Pleading Requirements
1. Chicago Daily Law Bulletin - The City's No. 1 Source for the Law Profession
http://www.chicagolawbulletin.com/...rintpath=/Articles/2015/07/29/Paul-Porvaznik-forum-7-29-15&classname=tera.gn3article[7/29/2015 4:56:04 PM]
Serving the city's law profession since 1854
July 29, 2015
The Fraudulent Transfer Act: Pleading to show actual fraud
By Paul B. Porvaznik
Paul B. Porvaznik is an attorney at Davis, McGrath LLC and practices primarily in the areas of commercial
litigation, landlord-tenant law, mechanic’s liens and post-judgment enforcement.
The Illinois Fraudulent Transfer Act is a powerful creditor enforcement tool aimed at capturing assets
transferred by a judgment debtor to elude a money judgment.
In United Central Bank v. Sindhu, 2014 WL 3748555, the plaintiff bank obtained a $4.3 million judgment
against Saad Sindhu. After initiating various citations to discover assets, United Central Bank learned that
several months after the judgment, the defendant transferred three properties to his sister — including one
residential property valued at more than $3 million. He also received and turned over several rent checks on
one of the transferred commercial properties.
The bank filed suit against the defendant and his sister under the FTA, 740 ILCS 160/1, et seq., seeking the
turnover of the $3 million property and the rent checks. The defendants moved to dismiss all counts. The U.S.
District Court denied the bulk of the motion.
The reasons
FTA sections 5(a)(1), (2) and 6 govern claims based on actual fraud, constructive fraud and for pre-transfer
claims, respectively.
The FTA’s actual fraud provision — section 5(a)(1) — requires a plaintiff to plead that a debtor transferred
property with actual intent to hinder or defraud a creditor, whether the claim arose before or after the transfer
was made.
Actual fraud factors include the following:
•The transfer or obligation was to an insider.
•The transfer or obligation was disclosed or concealed.
•Before the transfer was made or obligation was incurred, the debtor had been sued or threatened with
suit.
•The transfer was of substantially all the debtor’s assets.
•The debtor removed or concealed assets.