Case presentation
Presenter
Dikendra Sanjyal
Department of psychiatry
NMCTH,Birgunj
2081/05/25
Patient particulars
 Name: Miss RK
 Age: 18 years
 Sex: Female
 Religion: Muslim
 Education: Studying in class 12
 Occupation: Currently unemployed
 Marital status: Unmarried
 Socioeconomic Status: Lower middle class
 Family type: Nuclear
 Address: Birgunj
 DOA- 1st
Aug 2024
 DOE-1st
Aug 2024
 Source of referral: Family members
 Source of information:
 Patient herself
 Mother: Mrs. U.K, 40 year, married, Secondary level, Homemaker by
occupation, has stayed with the patient during entire period of illness
 Information provided is reliable and adequate
Chief complaints
 According to the patient:
 Consumption of soil, brick for 15 years
 Headache for 6 year
 Low mood for 6 years
 According to informant:
 Persistent eating brick,soil,Ashes for 15 years
 Headache for 6 years
 Restlessness for 6 years
 Low mood for 6 years
 Total duration of illness: 15 years
 Onset was insidious
 Course was continuous
 Predisposing factors: Positive family history of psychiatry illness in her father
and elder siblings
 Precipitating factors: Psychological trauma
 Perpetuating factors: could not elicited
History of presenting illness:
 According to the informant, she was apparently well 15 years back. One day
the informant noticed that the patient was eating soil and other non-food
substances while playing in the ground. She didn't pay any attention at the
time. The informant thought that she was too small to distinguish between
edible and non-edible food.
 The days went by, and when she was about 10-12 years old, the informant
found her maximum time with eating soil,clay,brick and ash . By this time, she
would be able to do household chores; she was reading in class six in a private
school and did well in her studies. She would go to the market to make small
and large purchases and had knowledge of distinguish the things which are
for eating and not eating.
 The informant used to allegedly beat her by telling her not to eat bricks, soil,
and ashes whenever she used to find her during eating this substances. But
the patient didn't listen to her, and whenever she saw the earth, brick, and
ash, she had a strong crave to eat that kind of substance. She said that it was
difficult for her to control eating because she felt restless, characterised by a
rapid heartbeat which persisted for some time and only relieved after eating
that non nutritive things.
 She had knowledge of eating this substance can causes harmful health
problems but she never left to eat such substances.
 Due to eating non nutritive substances behaviour, she had to visit clinic due to
sudden onset of pain in the upper quadrant of the abdomen, diffuse in
nature, lasting from several hours to a day, occurring at intervals of 2-3 days.
This pain was relieved by taking medication, and she had difficulty
functioning.
 How often did the informant scold her for not eating such a substance? When
asked, the patient replied, "She had a sudden urge to eat such a substance and
had difficulty controlling this urge. It was continuous in nature but whenever
she had stressor related to academic at that time she used eat more than usual
day.
 Despite the regular consumption of non-nutritive substances, the patient had
regular appetite, sleep, and bowel and bladder control
 Six years ago, there was a pandemic of the Corona virus and there was a
lockdown. At that time, the grandfather of the patient had a sudden onset of a
fever. The fever was unrecorded at the time. It was accompanied by a dry
cough and difficulty breathing. The family members then suspected that he
was suffering from Corona. They took him to NMCTH, where he was
admitted.
 For the treatment of the grandfather, all the family members were present in
the hospital. The patient was alone in the house. At that time, one of the
recognised neighbours suddenly came into her house and tried to physically
assault her. He threatened her not to tell others and that he would tell
everyone in the village. The patient couldn't control herself. She cried for a
long time in the house. In the evening, her family members returned home
and saw her face as sad. She did not communicate well with other family
members. When they asked the patient what the reason was, she didn't
answer and was in tears for some time. Then the family members didn't
bother her. They thought it was part of her grandfather's illness.
 The patient didn't tell anyone about the event and spent time alone in
the room. She didn't communicate with other family members, as she
used to communicate well with other family members. Most of the time
was spent thinking about what happened. She didn't have sleep at night
and had difficulty with sleep onset. She would keep thinking about the
event, which would often make her want to roll and toll over bed. At 12-
1am, the patient would fall asleep and wake up at a regular time in the
morning.
 The patient didn't respond immediately when called by friends and teachers
in the school, and they had to call several times to respond, and previously the
patient would respond in one call and used to share small things with friends
and spend time with friends and family members.
 When others saw this kind of behaviour from the patient, they would try to
console her, but she wouldn't respond and would go out of the house. The
patient used to get anxious thinking that this event would happen again and
would be restless.
 She would have repeated flashbacks of this event day and night. While
sleeping, the patient saw the dream and woke up between sleeps, leading to
disturbed sleep.
 In school, she had flashbacks of events and got anxious. While having a
flashback of the event, she didn't interact with others. The flashback was
persistent and continuous.
 While walking in the street and at school, the patient used to get anxious by
thinking about the events and didn't communicate with others at that time.
 After 2 years of the event, the patient shared all the things with her mother
and started to cry in front of her. During this period, the patient was able to
talk to her mother about the event and had difficulty forgetting it. She had
also thought that life would be better after death, but she never tried it.
 Day by day, the patient's performance at school deteriorated as she had
difficulty concentrating on her studies due to a disturbing flashback. This
flashback was clear as water, vivid, and occurred at any time and leads to
crying and sometime tearful eyes. She failed in class 10. Previously, the patient
had studied regularly and was an average student who had never failed an
exam.
 With these symptoms, the patient visited the NMCTH and was prescribed a
capsule of fluoxetine 20 mg per day and a tablet of olanzapine 5 mg per night.
She improved by 70-80% with regular medication for 4 months, after which
she stopped the medication.
 A few days later, the patient had a sudden onset of headache involving one
side of the head, throbbing in nature, lasting 1-2 hours, radiating to the other
side of the head, associated with dizziness and tearing from both eyes, and
difficulty seeing the near object, which usually occurred while she was having
a flashback of an event. After consultation with a respected department, she
used glasses and improved.
 She became irritable with members of her family, and this irritability usually
came on when someone was trying to ask her a question.
 As a result of this flashback, the patient began to check the door repeatedly at
night, and when asked, the patient replied, "If I don't lock the room, the
neighbour will come in the absence of family members, and this event will
happen again.
 She thought that all men of this gender would do this to her, so she didn't
communicate with her male friend after that.
 She started taking her medication irregularly again for 1 year. Her headaches
made it difficult for her to fall asleep. She would eat non-edible substances
until now and was admitted to the psychiatric ward for better management.
Negative history
 No h/o headache, fever, vomiting, head trauma
 No h/o use of any psychoactive substances
 No h/o overfamiliarity, talkativeness, distractibility, hyper religious behavior
 No h/o chest pain, difficulty in breathing, palpitations, feeling of impending doom
 No h/o distressing thoughts or repetitive actions
 No h/o seeing things which is not seen by others and hearing of voice which is not
heard by others.
 No history of someone had taken his thoughts from his brain or someone had inserted
thoughts in the brain.
Treatment history
 Mention in HOPI.
Past history
 No h/o hypertension, diabetes mellitus, pulmonary tuberculosis or thyroid
disorder
 No h/o any surgical illness or procedures
 No h/o any other psychiatric disorders
 Difficult in seeing near vision for 2 years and under treatment.
 Family History:
+VE PSYCHIATRY
ILLNESS IN
FATHER
Mother
Grandfather
died due to
aging at 70
years
Grandmother
died due to
aging at 67
years
+VE
PSYCHIATRY
ILLNESS
 Patient’s belonged to nuclear, Lower middle socioeconomic status of Muslim.
Her family consisted of father, mother and 5 children including her.
 Siblings:
 Eldest sister: Miss YJ. Ansari 25 year old, studying in Bachelor level has
symptoms of suggestive of schizophrenia, no medical and surgical illness and
has staying with patient.
 Eldest brother : Mr SA. Ansari 22 year old, educated up to 8th
class,
worked as mechanic in garage, has been staying with patient and
primary breadwinner of the family.
 Youngest brother: Miss SJ. Ansari 15 year old, studying in class
9,unemployed, has been staying with patient and know about her
illness.
 Patients father: Mr SJ. Ansari, 53 years old married Muslim, Labour by
occupation, educated up to primary level, has symptoms suggestive of
schizophrenia under medication for 2 years and Head of the family and
primary breadwinner.
 Patient mother: was primary care giver.
 IPR among family members-good except with her father due to illness.
 IPR between family members and patient –good
 Family members support her fully both emotionally and financially
 No history of continuous stressor in the family
 No history of medical/surgical illness in the family
 PRESENT LIVING SITUATION
 Own pucca house
 No overcrowding
 Well and adequate ventilation with proper sanitation
PERSONAL HISTORY
 Birth history
 Ante-natal History
 Planned and wanted pregnancy
 No h/o Medical illness (Diabetes/ HTN Jaundice /STD)
 No h/o hyper-emesis, 1st
trimester X-ray exposure, drug intake (other than folate, iron,
calcium) or psychotropic, alcohol or tobacco use
 Irregular ante-natal visits and immunized with 2 doses of TT
 USG was done and no abnormality found
 No h/o complications such as Rh incompatibility, twin pregnancy, threatened abortion ,
Bleeding, Pre-eclampsia, Eclampsia
 Fetal movements were perceived throughout the pregnancy (not excessive or sluggish)
 Natal history
 Born at the home via NVD at term.
 Presentation:? longitudinal, cephalic
 No h/o large head, low placenta, prolapsed cord, cord around neck, fetal
distress, prolonged labor, PROM, non-progress of labor, or meconium stained
liquor, excessive bleeding
 Neonatal and post-natal History
 Birth weight could not be remembered , cried immediately after birth, color : Pink
 No h/o Respiratory distress
 Activity Normal, Suckling Normal
 Feeding : Breast fed exclusively for initial 6 months : on demand
 No feeding problem
 No abnormalities in Urine/ stools
 No congenital anomalies/ stigmata noticed
 No h/o Neonatal seizures, Jaundice, Infection, Hospital stay
 Immunized according to Immunization program of Nepal, documents not available
 Developmental history:
 Informant didn’t know exact time of milestones achieved but said there
was no developmental delay and achieved all the milestones as
compared to other siblings.
Childhood and adolescent history
 She used to spend most of his time playing with her friends.
 Had no difficulty getting involved with new people.
 Used to get angry often with friends while playing but did not use to get involved in physical fights.
 No h/o serious childhood illness requiring medical attention.
 No h/o behaviors such as nail biting, temper tantrums, or bed wetting.
 No h/o Bruxism/ sleep walking/ limb movements, Nightmares and night terror.
 Play
 Preferred group play with her siblings and cousins, she mixed well with other
children from her class
 No indifference towards playmates or siblings
 No h/o inappropriate intrusion or impulsivity during play
 Understood games governed by rules
 Showed co-operation during play
 Did not bully other children
 Did no get bullied by other children
 Education
 Type of schooling: day-government School
 Nature of school: Normal
 Any literacy exposure before formal schooling? No.
 Started schooling at approximately 4-5 years
 Class 1-8: in her village private school
 Class 9-12: in her village in government school, changed school due to financial problem
 Average in study
 After that event the performance in higher class was decreased and fail in one subject in class 10.
 No history of disciplinary action in school
 Attendance: Regular
 Peer group adjustment: average
 Problems with teachers: Nil
 Class room behavior: Favorable, no altercations with peers or teachers
 Occupational history: currently unemployed
 Menstrual history:
 Menarche : 12 years
 Regular cycles, 30 +/- 3 days
 Flow: 4-5 days, uses 3-4 pads/day
 No h/o dysmenorrhea, menorrhagia
 L.M.P. :29 July 2024
 Relationship and sexual history:
 Identifies as a female at age of 5 years, attracted to males
 Had no relationship till now
 No specifies fantasies were told by patient
 History of physical abuse at age of 12 years
 Other couldn’t be elicited as patient didn’t say on asking further.
 Marital history: unmarried
 No history of drugs and substance use
Premorbid Temperament
 Activity level:
 Regularly went to school
 Wake up at 7 Am
 She became ready for going school at 8 AM
 9:00 Am had food
 9:40 Am went school by herself
 4:00Pm return from school
 4-5 Pm had breakfast
 5-7 Pm goes to play games with her friend
 7-8 Pm did homework
 8:00 Pm had dinner
 9:00Pm went for sleep in bed
 Impression – energetic+
 Persistence and attention spans:
 She completed homework by herself in one seating after playing with her
friends.
 Impression – immersed+
 Distractibility :
 Could focus on homework even with surrounding noise and activity.
 Impression – Attentive+
 Sensory threshold:
 When doing homework and watching TV, she was not annoyed when family members
talk loudly and able to complete tasks
 Impression – Unaffected +
 Mood :
 When patients stayed with mother and father she would often spend time talking to
her mother and helping her around the house during activities.
 Impression - Positive
 Rhythmicity:
 Patients slept and wake at similar time everyday but some times had to told to sleep
on time, meals was at regular time and bowel habits are regular
 Impression – Regular+
 Approach:
 When meeting new people or guests at home,she greets them without being told
 Making friends is easy and mixed well with everyone in class peers and other family
members
 Impression – Withdrawal (open)
 Intensity:
 When guests and family members visited she often was cheerful and greeted them
 Impression – Exuberant+
 Adaptability:
 She is not fussy when things are not to her liking like meals and tends to eat whatever is given to
her.
 Impression-Accommodating
 Overall impression – Easy child
GENERAL EXAMINATION
Date of admission: 1st
Aug, 2024.
Date of examination : 1st
Aug, 2024.
Weight: 48Kgs Height: 5feet, 3 inches (163cms) BMI: 20.22 kg/m2
Vitals: Temperature: 98F Pulse: 78/min Respiration rate: 15breaths/min SPO2: 98% in room air BP: 110/80
mm/Hg
Pallor/Icterus/Lymphadenopathy/Cyanosis/Clubbing/Dehydration: Not seen
SYSTEMIC EXAMINATION:
 Cardiovascular: S1S2M0
 Respiratory: B/L Vesicular breath sounds, no added sounds
 Gastro-intestinal: Soft, non tender, no organs palpable, Bowel sounds 3/min
NEUROLOGICAL EXAMINATION
 Cranial Nerves:
 Olfactory: smell senses: Intact
 Optic:
 Visual Acuity 6/6
 Pupil 3mm equal B/L, circular, reactive to light
 Fundus Examination: Color/ shape/margin/ cup- Normal
 Oculomotor, Trochlear, Abducens
 Eyeball central in position, gaze intact in all directions
 Trigeminal:
 Muscles of mastication: intact
 Sensation over face: intact
 Corneal reflex: intact
 Facial nerve:
 Facial symmetry and movement of the face: intact
 Taste in anterior two-third of the tongue: intact
 Vestibulo-Cochlear:
 Rinne’s test: AC>BC
 Weber test: Not lateralised
 Glossopharyngeal and Vagus:
 Uvula-centrally located
 Gag Reflex: intact
 Cough on Command: intact
 Spinal Accessory:
 Trapezius and Sternocleidomastoid: shrugging: intact
 Hypoglossal:
 Inspection of tongue and tongue movements: Intact
 Motor System:
 Muscle bulk: B/L equal
 Involuntary movements: not present
 Muscle tone: Not increased or decreased
 Muscle power: 5/5 over all limbs
 Sensory:
 Light touch: Intact B/L equal
 Pain: Intact
 Temperature: Intact
 Vibration: Intact
 Joint position and movements: Intact
 Reflexes:
 Biceps: Normal
 Triceps: Normal
 Brachioradialis: Normal
 Knee: Normal
 Ankle: Normal
 Abdominal: normal
 Cremasteric: Normal
 Plantar: Flexion
 Cerebellar signs:
 Nystagmus : not present
 Scanning speech: not present
 Intentional tremors (finger-nose test): Normal
 Heel-shin test: Normal
 Dysdiadochokinesia: Normal
 Rebound phenomenon: Normal
 Pendular knee jerk: Not present
 Tandem walking or ataxic gait: Normal
 Cortical signs:
 Tactile localization: normal
 Two-point discrimination: normal
 Stereognosis: normal
 Graphesthesia: normal
 Meningeal Signs:
 Neck rigidity: not present
 Kerning’s Sign: not present
 Brudzinski Sign: not present
 Impression: No neurological deficits were noted
MENTAL STATUS EXAMINATION
 GENERALAPPEARANCE AND BEHAVIOUR
 An average mesomorphic built female appear to be in late ten’s which was
appropriate as stated, Wearing a khurta suruwal which was appropriately dressed
according to sex, climate and culture, well kempt hygiene and well groom, No
abnormal gait was noted, No abnormal facial expressions and Abnormal
movements absent, on Greeting replied Salam walikum, Eye contact was initiated
and maintained, Attitude was cooperative, Psychomotor activities was neither
increased or decreased, No catatonic behavior noted and Rapport was Established.
 Speech:
 Spontaneous , Coherent, Comprehensible
 Language: Hindi and Bhojpuri
 Rate: average
 Tone: Normal
 Pitch: Normal
 Volume: Normal
 Reaction Time: neither increased nor decreased
 Mood/Affect:
 Subjective= Q:तपाई को मन कस्तो छ?
 A: राम्रो छ।
 Objective=
 Quality: Euthymic
 Range: Broad
 Fluctuation: not present
 Reactivity: present
 Congruent to Thought: present
 Q.तपाई आफ्नो घर को बारेमा के हि भनु होस् ?
 A. मेरो घर यहि बिरगंज मा छ। घर मा बुवा,आमा, दिदि, भाई हरु छन्। सबै घर मा
मिलेर बस्छ। मेरो दिदि ले पनि मानसिक को औसदी खानु हुन्छ।
 Q.तपाई आफ्नो मन पर्ने चाडपर्ब को बारेमा भनु होस् ?
 A. मलाई मनपर्ने चाड पर्ब इदी हो। इदी मा सबै परिवार वसेर खान पहिन्छा। लामो
समय रोजा वसेर त्यो दिन मिठो परिकार हरु खान पाहिंछा।
 THOUGHT:
 Form:
 Derailment/ LOA: Not present
 Circumstantiality/Tangentiality: Not present
 Neologism: Not present Word Salad: Not present
 Flow :
 Tempo: Flight of Ideas/Retardation: Not present
 Continuity: Block : Not present / Perseveration: Not present
 Q:के तपाइलाइ वोरिपरि को मान्छे ले तपाइ को बारेमा कुरा गर्छन जस्तो लाग्छ।
 A: लाग्दैन।
 Q:के तपाई लाई लाग्छ जादू टूना गरेर तपाई लाई बस मा गरेको जस्तो लाग्छ ।
 A:लाग्दैन।
 Q: के तपाइलाइ ओरिपरि को मान्छे ले तपाई को बारेमा कुरा गर्छन जस्तो लागछ ?
 A: लाग्दैन।
 Q:कैले काई हजुर लाई जीवन बेकार छ , बाचेर के गर्नु लाग्छ ?
 A:मलाई सदै लाग्छ मेरो जीन्दगी बेकार हो बनेर र यो जीन्दगी संग बाच्न्नु भन्दा मर्न पाए भनेर सोच आउछ।
 Q:तेस्तो सोच कति भेला आउछ?
 A:मलाई सदै आउछ।
 Q:अनि तपाई ले आफ्नो मर्ने को लागि केहि सोच भनउनो भयको वा सोच्नु भयको छ अगाडी ?
 A:छैन तेस्तो।
 Q:तपाई लाई मर्नु को सोच आउनु मुखे कारण के हो ?
 A:मलाई आज भन्दा ६ बर्षे पहिले मलाई गाऊको मान्छे ले नराम्रो गरेको थियो। तेसैले गर्दा मलाई हरे समय त्यो कुरा
मात्र आउछ र मलाई अरु संग बोल्ने पनि डर लाग्छ। अनि कसरि यो कुरा अरु लाई भने र यो समाज ले मलाई के भन्छ
होला यो कुरा थाहा पाया पछि भनेर मेरो मन उदाश हुन्छ।
 Q:के तपाई लाई कुनै चिज वा कार्य गरेको पक्का हुदा पनि काम ठिक छ छैन भनि दोहेरयरा हेर्ने
गर्नु हुन्छ?
 A:मलाई डर लाग्छ रति अनि घर मा कोठा भन्दा गरेकी भनेर हेर्न जान्छु।
 Q:के को डर लाग्छ ?
 A:तेही घटना फे रि हुन्छ कि भने।
 Q:त्यो सोचे सदै आउछ कि ?
 A:आउछ अनि मलाई डर लाग्छ।
 Q:तपाई सफा सुन्दर हुदा पनि बारेम्बार धेरै बेर लागेर लुगा धुने , नुहाउने अर्थार्थ सरसफाई
बिशेस समय दिने गर्नु हुन्छ ?
 A:छैन तेस्तो।
 Content:
 Passive death wish +
 Preoccupied by stressor/event
 No delusion of persecution, reference
 No obsession
 Q.तपाईं लाई लाग्छ कि तपाईं को सोच आफ्नो हैन र कसैले दिमाग मा सोच राख्दियको
हो जस्तो लाग्छ ?
 A: लाग्दैन
 Q:तपाईंलाई लाग्छ कि बाहिर सक्ती ले तपाईं को सोचे लाई निकालेको जस्तो लाग्छ ?
 A:लाग्दैन
 Possession: No thought insertion, no thought withdrawal
 Perception:
 Q. तपाइ एक्लाई बसेको बेला कानमा मा आवाज आउछ ?
 A: आउदैन ।
 Q: अरु ले नदेखेको चिज तपाईंले मात्र देख्नोनु हुन्छ ?
 A: देखेदिना ।
 Q: के तपाईं लाई आफ्नो वोरिपिरि को चिज साचो हैन जस्तो लाग्छ ?
 A: लाग्दैन ।
 Impression: No hallucination and derealisation.
Cognition :
 Orientation:
 Time:
 Period of day: Afternoon
 Estimated time: 2 pm
 Day: Thursday
 Date : 01-Aug 2024
 Season: Summer
 Place:
 Country : Nepal
 City: Birgunj
 Place: National medical
 college
 Floor : first
 Ward : Psychiatry
 Person:
 Identity of accompanying informant asked,
identified as mother with correct name
 Impression : Oriented to time,place and person.
 Attention:
o Digit forward: 4 DF
o Digit Backward: 3 DB
 Concentration:
o Serial subtraction : Could do 100-7 upto 3 and then did mistake
In 40-3 did all without any mistake and took 1 minutes
In 20-1 did without any mistake and took 15 second
o Name of weeks :Could able to name the weeks and its reverse.
o Name of months & its reverse: Was able to do
 Impression: Arousable and Sustained
 Memory
o Registration and Recall (3 words): Intact i.e (सर्प , कलम र नदि )
o Immediate: Recall after 5 minutes in same order.
o Recent : Confirmed breakfast: Intact
o Remote:
 Year of birth : correctly confirmed
 Impression: Preserved
 Intelligence:
o Q : (Young girl handling an unexpected guest at home in absence of other family members)
o A: welcomed the guest.
o Simple calculations: could able to perform multiplication i.e 2* 3=6
o Complex calculation: patient was asked if you buy 10 apple in cost of 50? What would be cost
of each apple? The patient replied correctly i.e 5.
o Information and Fund of knowledge:
 Prime minister of Nepal:Thaya chaina
 3 big rivers: Narayani, Khosi and Bhagmati
 3 big city: pokhara, Kathmandu and chitwan
Impression: Average
 Abstract thinking:
o Similarity test
 Q: Apple and Orange
 A: फलफ
ु ल हो ,दुबै गोलो हुन्छ ।
 Q: Pencil and pen
 A: दुवै ले लेखन सकिन्छ ।
 Q: Aeroplane and bus
 A:दुवै ले मान्छे बोक्छ ।
o Proverb test:
 Q: नाच्न नजान्ने आग्न टेडा
 A: आफ
ु लाई क
े हि गर्न आउदिन अनि अरु लाई सिकाउछ।
 A. कालो अच्छ्यर भैसी बराबर ?
 B. आफ
ु लाई नआउने क
ु राहरु बुझ्न गारो हुन्छ।
 Impression : Intact
 Judgment:
 Personal Judgment: was done by asking question i.e घर गया पछि क
े गर्नु हुन्छ ? She
replied “घर को काम,पड्ने अनि औसधि खाने।”
 Social Judgment: behaviour was observed with other’s people in ward, doctor and
staff.(well behaved, cooperative and respect them in the ward.
 Test Judgment:
 Well stamped envelope test: ठेगाना छ भने खबर गरिदिन छु
 House on fire Test: आगो निमाउनो सहयोगे गर्छु
 Facing a snake suddenly test:भाग्छु
 Impression: Intact
 INSIGHT: Translated
 Q: Do you think there is anything the matter with you?
 A: Yes I have restless and headache.
 Q: Could it be a nervous condition?
 A: yes
 Q: what do you think the cause is?
 A: mental cause
 Q: Why do you need to come to hospital?
 A: To treat my restless and disturbed sleep.
 Q: Do you think this symptoms were part of a nervous condition ?
 A: yes
 Impression: Grade D
DIAGNOSTIC FORMULATION:
 Miss RK, 18 years unmarried Muslim, Studying in class 12th
class, unemployed by occupation, belonging
to lower middle socioeconomic status with past history of difficult in seeing near object under treatment
for 2 years with family history of suggestive of schizophrenia in father and in elder sister with easy child
premorbid temperament was admitted in psychiatric ward with target symptoms of consumption of non
nutritive substances that is brick,soil,ash which was persistent and severe enough to require clinical
attention with ability to distinguish between edible and non edible substances with exposure to extremely
threatening event(physical abuse) at 12 years of age and was re-experienced again and again in the form
of memories, repetitive dreams and images with flashback with fear of having episode again with low
mood, disturbed sleep, decreased interest in pleasure activites,hopelessness,worthlessness with
predisposing factor being positive family history of psychiatric illness in father and elder sister with
precipitating factor being physical abuse in children withpersonal history of decline in study due to
repeated flash back of events.
 On MSE revealing-ETEC initiated and maintain with linear and goal directed thought with preoccupied
by events with hopelessness,worthlessness, passive death wishes with insight to grade D
 Provisional diagnosis:
 ICD-11:
 6B84-PICA
 6B40-Post traumatic stress disorder
 Points favour for PICA
 Regular consumption of non nutritive substance
 Persistent or severe to require to clinical attention
 Based on age and level of intellectual function
 Points favour for PTSD
 Exposure to an event
 Re-experienced in the present
 Reminder likely to produce re-experiencing of the traumatic event are deliberately
avoided.
 Persistent
 Disturbed in personal,family,social and education
Management:
 Investigation
Sodium 137
Potassium 4.72
Blood Urea 15
Creatinine 0.66
RBS 87
TSH 2.678
 As the patient was complaint about pain in the head and watering from
the eyes the ophthalmic consultation was done.
 Final diagnosis:
 Pica with Post traumatic stress disorder
MANAGEMENT PLAN:
 Non pharmacological
 Pharmacological
Non pharmacological Approach
 Psycho-education to the patients party.
 Nutritional Counseling
 Environmental Modification
 PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5)=44
 Pharmacological Approach:
 Tab fluoxetine 20 mg and dose was increased upto 30 mg per day.
 Tab olanzapine 5mg per day at night
 Tab naproxen 250 mg po sos
 Tab clonazepam 0.25 mg po sos
 Plan
 CBT
 Behavioral Modification Therapy
CASE CONCEPTUALIZATION
Consumption of
non nutritive
substance at the age
of 2 years
Increasing age with
ability to distinguish
between edible to non
edible substance
Strong crave
for these
substance
that leads to
restless
Only relieved
crave after
eating
substance till
now
6 years back had
physical abuse
Reexperiencing
of events with
images and
flashback some
time during
dreams and
during day
time
Pica and PTSD
Topic of presentation
 Treatments for PICA
 Various treatments for pica including:
 Nutritional
 Psychological
 Pharmacological
 Behavioural interventions
 Ecological
 Sensory approaches
Stiegler, L. N. (2005). Understanding Pica Behavior: A Review for Clinical and Education Professionals. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 20(1), 27-
38. https://doi.org/10.1177/10883576050200010301
 Treatment of PTSD
 Non-pharmacologic treatment for PTSD
emphasizes:
 shared decision-making and
collaborative care as vital early
interventions
 The primary recommendation for PTSD
treatment is trauma-focused therapy.
 Research also supports newer
therapies, including Cognitive
Behavioral Therapy for PTSD,
Narrative Exposure Therapy (NET),
and Written Exposure Therapy, which
have shown positive effects on PTSD
symptoms
 Pharmacologic treatment for PTSD
recommends SSRIs and SNRIs such as
fluoxetine, paroxetine, sertraline, and
venlafaxine.
Schrader C, Ross A. A Review of PTSD and Current Treatment Strategies. Mo Med. 2021 Nov-Dec;118(6):546-551. PMID: 34924624;
PMCID: PMC8672952.
Reference
 Stiegler, L. N. (2005). Understanding Pica Behavior: A Review for Clinical and Education
Professionals. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 20(1), 27-38.
https://doi.org/10.1177/10883576050200010301
 Schrader C, Ross A. A Review of PTSD and Current Treatment Strategies. Mo Med. 2021
Nov-Dec;118(6):546-551. PMID: 34924624; PMCID: PMC8672952.
THANK YOU

Case presentation bhadra twenty five.pptx

  • 1.
    Case presentation Presenter Dikendra Sanjyal Departmentof psychiatry NMCTH,Birgunj 2081/05/25
  • 2.
    Patient particulars  Name:Miss RK  Age: 18 years  Sex: Female  Religion: Muslim  Education: Studying in class 12  Occupation: Currently unemployed  Marital status: Unmarried  Socioeconomic Status: Lower middle class  Family type: Nuclear  Address: Birgunj  DOA- 1st Aug 2024  DOE-1st Aug 2024
  • 3.
     Source ofreferral: Family members  Source of information:  Patient herself  Mother: Mrs. U.K, 40 year, married, Secondary level, Homemaker by occupation, has stayed with the patient during entire period of illness  Information provided is reliable and adequate
  • 4.
    Chief complaints  Accordingto the patient:  Consumption of soil, brick for 15 years  Headache for 6 year  Low mood for 6 years  According to informant:  Persistent eating brick,soil,Ashes for 15 years  Headache for 6 years  Restlessness for 6 years  Low mood for 6 years
  • 5.
     Total durationof illness: 15 years  Onset was insidious  Course was continuous  Predisposing factors: Positive family history of psychiatry illness in her father and elder siblings  Precipitating factors: Psychological trauma  Perpetuating factors: could not elicited
  • 6.
    History of presentingillness:  According to the informant, she was apparently well 15 years back. One day the informant noticed that the patient was eating soil and other non-food substances while playing in the ground. She didn't pay any attention at the time. The informant thought that she was too small to distinguish between edible and non-edible food.
  • 7.
     The dayswent by, and when she was about 10-12 years old, the informant found her maximum time with eating soil,clay,brick and ash . By this time, she would be able to do household chores; she was reading in class six in a private school and did well in her studies. She would go to the market to make small and large purchases and had knowledge of distinguish the things which are for eating and not eating.
  • 8.
     The informantused to allegedly beat her by telling her not to eat bricks, soil, and ashes whenever she used to find her during eating this substances. But the patient didn't listen to her, and whenever she saw the earth, brick, and ash, she had a strong crave to eat that kind of substance. She said that it was difficult for her to control eating because she felt restless, characterised by a rapid heartbeat which persisted for some time and only relieved after eating that non nutritive things.  She had knowledge of eating this substance can causes harmful health problems but she never left to eat such substances.
  • 9.
     Due toeating non nutritive substances behaviour, she had to visit clinic due to sudden onset of pain in the upper quadrant of the abdomen, diffuse in nature, lasting from several hours to a day, occurring at intervals of 2-3 days. This pain was relieved by taking medication, and she had difficulty functioning.
  • 10.
     How oftendid the informant scold her for not eating such a substance? When asked, the patient replied, "She had a sudden urge to eat such a substance and had difficulty controlling this urge. It was continuous in nature but whenever she had stressor related to academic at that time she used eat more than usual day.  Despite the regular consumption of non-nutritive substances, the patient had regular appetite, sleep, and bowel and bladder control
  • 11.
     Six yearsago, there was a pandemic of the Corona virus and there was a lockdown. At that time, the grandfather of the patient had a sudden onset of a fever. The fever was unrecorded at the time. It was accompanied by a dry cough and difficulty breathing. The family members then suspected that he was suffering from Corona. They took him to NMCTH, where he was admitted.
  • 12.
     For thetreatment of the grandfather, all the family members were present in the hospital. The patient was alone in the house. At that time, one of the recognised neighbours suddenly came into her house and tried to physically assault her. He threatened her not to tell others and that he would tell everyone in the village. The patient couldn't control herself. She cried for a long time in the house. In the evening, her family members returned home and saw her face as sad. She did not communicate well with other family members. When they asked the patient what the reason was, she didn't answer and was in tears for some time. Then the family members didn't bother her. They thought it was part of her grandfather's illness.
  • 13.
     The patientdidn't tell anyone about the event and spent time alone in the room. She didn't communicate with other family members, as she used to communicate well with other family members. Most of the time was spent thinking about what happened. She didn't have sleep at night and had difficulty with sleep onset. She would keep thinking about the event, which would often make her want to roll and toll over bed. At 12- 1am, the patient would fall asleep and wake up at a regular time in the morning.
  • 14.
     The patientdidn't respond immediately when called by friends and teachers in the school, and they had to call several times to respond, and previously the patient would respond in one call and used to share small things with friends and spend time with friends and family members.
  • 15.
     When otherssaw this kind of behaviour from the patient, they would try to console her, but she wouldn't respond and would go out of the house. The patient used to get anxious thinking that this event would happen again and would be restless.  She would have repeated flashbacks of this event day and night. While sleeping, the patient saw the dream and woke up between sleeps, leading to disturbed sleep.  In school, she had flashbacks of events and got anxious. While having a flashback of the event, she didn't interact with others. The flashback was persistent and continuous.
  • 16.
     While walkingin the street and at school, the patient used to get anxious by thinking about the events and didn't communicate with others at that time.  After 2 years of the event, the patient shared all the things with her mother and started to cry in front of her. During this period, the patient was able to talk to her mother about the event and had difficulty forgetting it. She had also thought that life would be better after death, but she never tried it.
  • 17.
     Day byday, the patient's performance at school deteriorated as she had difficulty concentrating on her studies due to a disturbing flashback. This flashback was clear as water, vivid, and occurred at any time and leads to crying and sometime tearful eyes. She failed in class 10. Previously, the patient had studied regularly and was an average student who had never failed an exam.
  • 18.
     With thesesymptoms, the patient visited the NMCTH and was prescribed a capsule of fluoxetine 20 mg per day and a tablet of olanzapine 5 mg per night. She improved by 70-80% with regular medication for 4 months, after which she stopped the medication.
  • 19.
     A fewdays later, the patient had a sudden onset of headache involving one side of the head, throbbing in nature, lasting 1-2 hours, radiating to the other side of the head, associated with dizziness and tearing from both eyes, and difficulty seeing the near object, which usually occurred while she was having a flashback of an event. After consultation with a respected department, she used glasses and improved.
  • 20.
     She becameirritable with members of her family, and this irritability usually came on when someone was trying to ask her a question.  As a result of this flashback, the patient began to check the door repeatedly at night, and when asked, the patient replied, "If I don't lock the room, the neighbour will come in the absence of family members, and this event will happen again.
  • 21.
     She thoughtthat all men of this gender would do this to her, so she didn't communicate with her male friend after that.  She started taking her medication irregularly again for 1 year. Her headaches made it difficult for her to fall asleep. She would eat non-edible substances until now and was admitted to the psychiatric ward for better management.
  • 22.
    Negative history  Noh/o headache, fever, vomiting, head trauma  No h/o use of any psychoactive substances  No h/o overfamiliarity, talkativeness, distractibility, hyper religious behavior  No h/o chest pain, difficulty in breathing, palpitations, feeling of impending doom  No h/o distressing thoughts or repetitive actions  No h/o seeing things which is not seen by others and hearing of voice which is not heard by others.  No history of someone had taken his thoughts from his brain or someone had inserted thoughts in the brain.
  • 23.
  • 24.
    Past history  Noh/o hypertension, diabetes mellitus, pulmonary tuberculosis or thyroid disorder  No h/o any surgical illness or procedures  No h/o any other psychiatric disorders  Difficult in seeing near vision for 2 years and under treatment.
  • 25.
     Family History: +VEPSYCHIATRY ILLNESS IN FATHER Mother Grandfather died due to aging at 70 years Grandmother died due to aging at 67 years +VE PSYCHIATRY ILLNESS
  • 26.
     Patient’s belongedto nuclear, Lower middle socioeconomic status of Muslim. Her family consisted of father, mother and 5 children including her.  Siblings:  Eldest sister: Miss YJ. Ansari 25 year old, studying in Bachelor level has symptoms of suggestive of schizophrenia, no medical and surgical illness and has staying with patient.  Eldest brother : Mr SA. Ansari 22 year old, educated up to 8th class, worked as mechanic in garage, has been staying with patient and primary breadwinner of the family.
  • 27.
     Youngest brother:Miss SJ. Ansari 15 year old, studying in class 9,unemployed, has been staying with patient and know about her illness.  Patients father: Mr SJ. Ansari, 53 years old married Muslim, Labour by occupation, educated up to primary level, has symptoms suggestive of schizophrenia under medication for 2 years and Head of the family and primary breadwinner.  Patient mother: was primary care giver.
  • 28.
     IPR amongfamily members-good except with her father due to illness.  IPR between family members and patient –good  Family members support her fully both emotionally and financially  No history of continuous stressor in the family  No history of medical/surgical illness in the family
  • 29.
     PRESENT LIVINGSITUATION  Own pucca house  No overcrowding  Well and adequate ventilation with proper sanitation
  • 30.
    PERSONAL HISTORY  Birthhistory  Ante-natal History  Planned and wanted pregnancy  No h/o Medical illness (Diabetes/ HTN Jaundice /STD)  No h/o hyper-emesis, 1st trimester X-ray exposure, drug intake (other than folate, iron, calcium) or psychotropic, alcohol or tobacco use  Irregular ante-natal visits and immunized with 2 doses of TT  USG was done and no abnormality found  No h/o complications such as Rh incompatibility, twin pregnancy, threatened abortion , Bleeding, Pre-eclampsia, Eclampsia  Fetal movements were perceived throughout the pregnancy (not excessive or sluggish)
  • 31.
     Natal history Born at the home via NVD at term.  Presentation:? longitudinal, cephalic  No h/o large head, low placenta, prolapsed cord, cord around neck, fetal distress, prolonged labor, PROM, non-progress of labor, or meconium stained liquor, excessive bleeding
  • 32.
     Neonatal andpost-natal History  Birth weight could not be remembered , cried immediately after birth, color : Pink  No h/o Respiratory distress  Activity Normal, Suckling Normal  Feeding : Breast fed exclusively for initial 6 months : on demand  No feeding problem  No abnormalities in Urine/ stools  No congenital anomalies/ stigmata noticed  No h/o Neonatal seizures, Jaundice, Infection, Hospital stay  Immunized according to Immunization program of Nepal, documents not available
  • 33.
     Developmental history: Informant didn’t know exact time of milestones achieved but said there was no developmental delay and achieved all the milestones as compared to other siblings.
  • 34.
    Childhood and adolescenthistory  She used to spend most of his time playing with her friends.  Had no difficulty getting involved with new people.  Used to get angry often with friends while playing but did not use to get involved in physical fights.  No h/o serious childhood illness requiring medical attention.  No h/o behaviors such as nail biting, temper tantrums, or bed wetting.  No h/o Bruxism/ sleep walking/ limb movements, Nightmares and night terror.
  • 35.
     Play  Preferredgroup play with her siblings and cousins, she mixed well with other children from her class  No indifference towards playmates or siblings  No h/o inappropriate intrusion or impulsivity during play  Understood games governed by rules  Showed co-operation during play  Did not bully other children  Did no get bullied by other children
  • 36.
     Education  Typeof schooling: day-government School  Nature of school: Normal  Any literacy exposure before formal schooling? No.  Started schooling at approximately 4-5 years  Class 1-8: in her village private school  Class 9-12: in her village in government school, changed school due to financial problem  Average in study  After that event the performance in higher class was decreased and fail in one subject in class 10.  No history of disciplinary action in school  Attendance: Regular  Peer group adjustment: average  Problems with teachers: Nil  Class room behavior: Favorable, no altercations with peers or teachers
  • 37.
     Occupational history:currently unemployed  Menstrual history:  Menarche : 12 years  Regular cycles, 30 +/- 3 days  Flow: 4-5 days, uses 3-4 pads/day  No h/o dysmenorrhea, menorrhagia  L.M.P. :29 July 2024
  • 38.
     Relationship andsexual history:  Identifies as a female at age of 5 years, attracted to males  Had no relationship till now  No specifies fantasies were told by patient  History of physical abuse at age of 12 years  Other couldn’t be elicited as patient didn’t say on asking further.
  • 39.
     Marital history:unmarried  No history of drugs and substance use
  • 40.
    Premorbid Temperament  Activitylevel:  Regularly went to school  Wake up at 7 Am  She became ready for going school at 8 AM  9:00 Am had food  9:40 Am went school by herself  4:00Pm return from school  4-5 Pm had breakfast  5-7 Pm goes to play games with her friend  7-8 Pm did homework  8:00 Pm had dinner  9:00Pm went for sleep in bed  Impression – energetic+
  • 41.
     Persistence andattention spans:  She completed homework by herself in one seating after playing with her friends.  Impression – immersed+  Distractibility :  Could focus on homework even with surrounding noise and activity.  Impression – Attentive+
  • 42.
     Sensory threshold: When doing homework and watching TV, she was not annoyed when family members talk loudly and able to complete tasks  Impression – Unaffected +  Mood :  When patients stayed with mother and father she would often spend time talking to her mother and helping her around the house during activities.  Impression - Positive
  • 43.
     Rhythmicity:  Patientsslept and wake at similar time everyday but some times had to told to sleep on time, meals was at regular time and bowel habits are regular  Impression – Regular+  Approach:  When meeting new people or guests at home,she greets them without being told  Making friends is easy and mixed well with everyone in class peers and other family members  Impression – Withdrawal (open)
  • 44.
     Intensity:  Whenguests and family members visited she often was cheerful and greeted them  Impression – Exuberant+  Adaptability:  She is not fussy when things are not to her liking like meals and tends to eat whatever is given to her.  Impression-Accommodating  Overall impression – Easy child
  • 45.
    GENERAL EXAMINATION Date ofadmission: 1st Aug, 2024. Date of examination : 1st Aug, 2024. Weight: 48Kgs Height: 5feet, 3 inches (163cms) BMI: 20.22 kg/m2 Vitals: Temperature: 98F Pulse: 78/min Respiration rate: 15breaths/min SPO2: 98% in room air BP: 110/80 mm/Hg Pallor/Icterus/Lymphadenopathy/Cyanosis/Clubbing/Dehydration: Not seen SYSTEMIC EXAMINATION:  Cardiovascular: S1S2M0  Respiratory: B/L Vesicular breath sounds, no added sounds  Gastro-intestinal: Soft, non tender, no organs palpable, Bowel sounds 3/min
  • 46.
    NEUROLOGICAL EXAMINATION  CranialNerves:  Olfactory: smell senses: Intact  Optic:  Visual Acuity 6/6  Pupil 3mm equal B/L, circular, reactive to light  Fundus Examination: Color/ shape/margin/ cup- Normal  Oculomotor, Trochlear, Abducens  Eyeball central in position, gaze intact in all directions  Trigeminal:  Muscles of mastication: intact  Sensation over face: intact  Corneal reflex: intact
  • 47.
     Facial nerve: Facial symmetry and movement of the face: intact  Taste in anterior two-third of the tongue: intact  Vestibulo-Cochlear:  Rinne’s test: AC>BC  Weber test: Not lateralised  Glossopharyngeal and Vagus:  Uvula-centrally located  Gag Reflex: intact  Cough on Command: intact  Spinal Accessory:  Trapezius and Sternocleidomastoid: shrugging: intact  Hypoglossal:  Inspection of tongue and tongue movements: Intact
  • 48.
     Motor System: Muscle bulk: B/L equal  Involuntary movements: not present  Muscle tone: Not increased or decreased  Muscle power: 5/5 over all limbs  Sensory:  Light touch: Intact B/L equal  Pain: Intact  Temperature: Intact  Vibration: Intact  Joint position and movements: Intact
  • 49.
     Reflexes:  Biceps:Normal  Triceps: Normal  Brachioradialis: Normal  Knee: Normal  Ankle: Normal  Abdominal: normal  Cremasteric: Normal  Plantar: Flexion
  • 50.
     Cerebellar signs: Nystagmus : not present  Scanning speech: not present  Intentional tremors (finger-nose test): Normal  Heel-shin test: Normal  Dysdiadochokinesia: Normal  Rebound phenomenon: Normal  Pendular knee jerk: Not present  Tandem walking or ataxic gait: Normal
  • 51.
     Cortical signs: Tactile localization: normal  Two-point discrimination: normal  Stereognosis: normal  Graphesthesia: normal  Meningeal Signs:  Neck rigidity: not present  Kerning’s Sign: not present  Brudzinski Sign: not present  Impression: No neurological deficits were noted
  • 52.
    MENTAL STATUS EXAMINATION GENERALAPPEARANCE AND BEHAVIOUR  An average mesomorphic built female appear to be in late ten’s which was appropriate as stated, Wearing a khurta suruwal which was appropriately dressed according to sex, climate and culture, well kempt hygiene and well groom, No abnormal gait was noted, No abnormal facial expressions and Abnormal movements absent, on Greeting replied Salam walikum, Eye contact was initiated and maintained, Attitude was cooperative, Psychomotor activities was neither increased or decreased, No catatonic behavior noted and Rapport was Established.
  • 53.
     Speech:  Spontaneous, Coherent, Comprehensible  Language: Hindi and Bhojpuri  Rate: average  Tone: Normal  Pitch: Normal  Volume: Normal  Reaction Time: neither increased nor decreased
  • 54.
     Mood/Affect:  Subjective=Q:तपाई को मन कस्तो छ?  A: राम्रो छ।  Objective=  Quality: Euthymic  Range: Broad  Fluctuation: not present  Reactivity: present  Congruent to Thought: present
  • 55.
     Q.तपाई आफ्नोघर को बारेमा के हि भनु होस् ?  A. मेरो घर यहि बिरगंज मा छ। घर मा बुवा,आमा, दिदि, भाई हरु छन्। सबै घर मा मिलेर बस्छ। मेरो दिदि ले पनि मानसिक को औसदी खानु हुन्छ।  Q.तपाई आफ्नो मन पर्ने चाडपर्ब को बारेमा भनु होस् ?  A. मलाई मनपर्ने चाड पर्ब इदी हो। इदी मा सबै परिवार वसेर खान पहिन्छा। लामो समय रोजा वसेर त्यो दिन मिठो परिकार हरु खान पाहिंछा।
  • 56.
     THOUGHT:  Form: Derailment/ LOA: Not present  Circumstantiality/Tangentiality: Not present  Neologism: Not present Word Salad: Not present  Flow :  Tempo: Flight of Ideas/Retardation: Not present  Continuity: Block : Not present / Perseveration: Not present
  • 57.
     Q:के तपाइलाइवोरिपरि को मान्छे ले तपाइ को बारेमा कुरा गर्छन जस्तो लाग्छ।  A: लाग्दैन।  Q:के तपाई लाई लाग्छ जादू टूना गरेर तपाई लाई बस मा गरेको जस्तो लाग्छ ।  A:लाग्दैन।  Q: के तपाइलाइ ओरिपरि को मान्छे ले तपाई को बारेमा कुरा गर्छन जस्तो लागछ ?  A: लाग्दैन।
  • 58.
     Q:कैले काईहजुर लाई जीवन बेकार छ , बाचेर के गर्नु लाग्छ ?  A:मलाई सदै लाग्छ मेरो जीन्दगी बेकार हो बनेर र यो जीन्दगी संग बाच्न्नु भन्दा मर्न पाए भनेर सोच आउछ।  Q:तेस्तो सोच कति भेला आउछ?  A:मलाई सदै आउछ।  Q:अनि तपाई ले आफ्नो मर्ने को लागि केहि सोच भनउनो भयको वा सोच्नु भयको छ अगाडी ?  A:छैन तेस्तो।  Q:तपाई लाई मर्नु को सोच आउनु मुखे कारण के हो ?  A:मलाई आज भन्दा ६ बर्षे पहिले मलाई गाऊको मान्छे ले नराम्रो गरेको थियो। तेसैले गर्दा मलाई हरे समय त्यो कुरा मात्र आउछ र मलाई अरु संग बोल्ने पनि डर लाग्छ। अनि कसरि यो कुरा अरु लाई भने र यो समाज ले मलाई के भन्छ होला यो कुरा थाहा पाया पछि भनेर मेरो मन उदाश हुन्छ।
  • 59.
     Q:के तपाईलाई कुनै चिज वा कार्य गरेको पक्का हुदा पनि काम ठिक छ छैन भनि दोहेरयरा हेर्ने गर्नु हुन्छ?  A:मलाई डर लाग्छ रति अनि घर मा कोठा भन्दा गरेकी भनेर हेर्न जान्छु।  Q:के को डर लाग्छ ?  A:तेही घटना फे रि हुन्छ कि भने।  Q:त्यो सोचे सदै आउछ कि ?  A:आउछ अनि मलाई डर लाग्छ।  Q:तपाई सफा सुन्दर हुदा पनि बारेम्बार धेरै बेर लागेर लुगा धुने , नुहाउने अर्थार्थ सरसफाई बिशेस समय दिने गर्नु हुन्छ ?  A:छैन तेस्तो।
  • 60.
     Content:  Passivedeath wish +  Preoccupied by stressor/event  No delusion of persecution, reference  No obsession
  • 61.
     Q.तपाईं लाईलाग्छ कि तपाईं को सोच आफ्नो हैन र कसैले दिमाग मा सोच राख्दियको हो जस्तो लाग्छ ?  A: लाग्दैन  Q:तपाईंलाई लाग्छ कि बाहिर सक्ती ले तपाईं को सोचे लाई निकालेको जस्तो लाग्छ ?  A:लाग्दैन  Possession: No thought insertion, no thought withdrawal
  • 62.
     Perception:  Q.तपाइ एक्लाई बसेको बेला कानमा मा आवाज आउछ ?  A: आउदैन ।  Q: अरु ले नदेखेको चिज तपाईंले मात्र देख्नोनु हुन्छ ?  A: देखेदिना ।  Q: के तपाईं लाई आफ्नो वोरिपिरि को चिज साचो हैन जस्तो लाग्छ ?  A: लाग्दैन ।  Impression: No hallucination and derealisation.
  • 63.
    Cognition :  Orientation: Time:  Period of day: Afternoon  Estimated time: 2 pm  Day: Thursday  Date : 01-Aug 2024  Season: Summer  Place:  Country : Nepal  City: Birgunj  Place: National medical  college  Floor : first  Ward : Psychiatry  Person:  Identity of accompanying informant asked, identified as mother with correct name  Impression : Oriented to time,place and person.
  • 64.
     Attention: o Digitforward: 4 DF o Digit Backward: 3 DB  Concentration: o Serial subtraction : Could do 100-7 upto 3 and then did mistake In 40-3 did all without any mistake and took 1 minutes In 20-1 did without any mistake and took 15 second o Name of weeks :Could able to name the weeks and its reverse. o Name of months & its reverse: Was able to do  Impression: Arousable and Sustained
  • 65.
     Memory o Registrationand Recall (3 words): Intact i.e (सर्प , कलम र नदि ) o Immediate: Recall after 5 minutes in same order. o Recent : Confirmed breakfast: Intact o Remote:  Year of birth : correctly confirmed  Impression: Preserved
  • 66.
     Intelligence: o Q: (Young girl handling an unexpected guest at home in absence of other family members) o A: welcomed the guest. o Simple calculations: could able to perform multiplication i.e 2* 3=6 o Complex calculation: patient was asked if you buy 10 apple in cost of 50? What would be cost of each apple? The patient replied correctly i.e 5. o Information and Fund of knowledge:  Prime minister of Nepal:Thaya chaina  3 big rivers: Narayani, Khosi and Bhagmati  3 big city: pokhara, Kathmandu and chitwan Impression: Average
  • 67.
     Abstract thinking: oSimilarity test  Q: Apple and Orange  A: फलफ ु ल हो ,दुबै गोलो हुन्छ ।  Q: Pencil and pen  A: दुवै ले लेखन सकिन्छ ।  Q: Aeroplane and bus  A:दुवै ले मान्छे बोक्छ ।
  • 68.
    o Proverb test: Q: नाच्न नजान्ने आग्न टेडा  A: आफ ु लाई क े हि गर्न आउदिन अनि अरु लाई सिकाउछ।  A. कालो अच्छ्यर भैसी बराबर ?  B. आफ ु लाई नआउने क ु राहरु बुझ्न गारो हुन्छ।  Impression : Intact
  • 69.
     Judgment:  PersonalJudgment: was done by asking question i.e घर गया पछि क े गर्नु हुन्छ ? She replied “घर को काम,पड्ने अनि औसधि खाने।”  Social Judgment: behaviour was observed with other’s people in ward, doctor and staff.(well behaved, cooperative and respect them in the ward.  Test Judgment:  Well stamped envelope test: ठेगाना छ भने खबर गरिदिन छु  House on fire Test: आगो निमाउनो सहयोगे गर्छु  Facing a snake suddenly test:भाग्छु  Impression: Intact
  • 70.
     INSIGHT: Translated Q: Do you think there is anything the matter with you?  A: Yes I have restless and headache.  Q: Could it be a nervous condition?  A: yes  Q: what do you think the cause is?  A: mental cause  Q: Why do you need to come to hospital?  A: To treat my restless and disturbed sleep.  Q: Do you think this symptoms were part of a nervous condition ?  A: yes  Impression: Grade D
  • 71.
    DIAGNOSTIC FORMULATION:  MissRK, 18 years unmarried Muslim, Studying in class 12th class, unemployed by occupation, belonging to lower middle socioeconomic status with past history of difficult in seeing near object under treatment for 2 years with family history of suggestive of schizophrenia in father and in elder sister with easy child premorbid temperament was admitted in psychiatric ward with target symptoms of consumption of non nutritive substances that is brick,soil,ash which was persistent and severe enough to require clinical attention with ability to distinguish between edible and non edible substances with exposure to extremely threatening event(physical abuse) at 12 years of age and was re-experienced again and again in the form of memories, repetitive dreams and images with flashback with fear of having episode again with low mood, disturbed sleep, decreased interest in pleasure activites,hopelessness,worthlessness with predisposing factor being positive family history of psychiatric illness in father and elder sister with precipitating factor being physical abuse in children withpersonal history of decline in study due to repeated flash back of events.  On MSE revealing-ETEC initiated and maintain with linear and goal directed thought with preoccupied by events with hopelessness,worthlessness, passive death wishes with insight to grade D
  • 72.
     Provisional diagnosis: ICD-11:  6B84-PICA  6B40-Post traumatic stress disorder
  • 73.
     Points favourfor PICA  Regular consumption of non nutritive substance  Persistent or severe to require to clinical attention  Based on age and level of intellectual function  Points favour for PTSD  Exposure to an event  Re-experienced in the present  Reminder likely to produce re-experiencing of the traumatic event are deliberately avoided.  Persistent  Disturbed in personal,family,social and education
  • 74.
    Management:  Investigation Sodium 137 Potassium4.72 Blood Urea 15 Creatinine 0.66 RBS 87 TSH 2.678
  • 75.
     As thepatient was complaint about pain in the head and watering from the eyes the ophthalmic consultation was done.
  • 76.
     Final diagnosis: Pica with Post traumatic stress disorder
  • 77.
    MANAGEMENT PLAN:  Nonpharmacological  Pharmacological
  • 78.
    Non pharmacological Approach Psycho-education to the patients party.  Nutritional Counseling  Environmental Modification  PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5)=44
  • 80.
     Pharmacological Approach: Tab fluoxetine 20 mg and dose was increased upto 30 mg per day.  Tab olanzapine 5mg per day at night  Tab naproxen 250 mg po sos  Tab clonazepam 0.25 mg po sos
  • 81.
     Plan  CBT Behavioral Modification Therapy
  • 82.
    CASE CONCEPTUALIZATION Consumption of nonnutritive substance at the age of 2 years Increasing age with ability to distinguish between edible to non edible substance Strong crave for these substance that leads to restless Only relieved crave after eating substance till now 6 years back had physical abuse Reexperiencing of events with images and flashback some time during dreams and during day time Pica and PTSD
  • 83.
  • 84.
     Treatments forPICA  Various treatments for pica including:  Nutritional  Psychological  Pharmacological  Behavioural interventions  Ecological  Sensory approaches Stiegler, L. N. (2005). Understanding Pica Behavior: A Review for Clinical and Education Professionals. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 20(1), 27- 38. https://doi.org/10.1177/10883576050200010301
  • 85.
     Treatment ofPTSD  Non-pharmacologic treatment for PTSD emphasizes:  shared decision-making and collaborative care as vital early interventions  The primary recommendation for PTSD treatment is trauma-focused therapy.  Research also supports newer therapies, including Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for PTSD, Narrative Exposure Therapy (NET), and Written Exposure Therapy, which have shown positive effects on PTSD symptoms  Pharmacologic treatment for PTSD recommends SSRIs and SNRIs such as fluoxetine, paroxetine, sertraline, and venlafaxine. Schrader C, Ross A. A Review of PTSD and Current Treatment Strategies. Mo Med. 2021 Nov-Dec;118(6):546-551. PMID: 34924624; PMCID: PMC8672952.
  • 86.
    Reference  Stiegler, L.N. (2005). Understanding Pica Behavior: A Review for Clinical and Education Professionals. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 20(1), 27-38. https://doi.org/10.1177/10883576050200010301  Schrader C, Ross A. A Review of PTSD and Current Treatment Strategies. Mo Med. 2021 Nov-Dec;118(6):546-551. PMID: 34924624; PMCID: PMC8672952.
  • 87.

Editor's Notes

  • #78 Nutritional Counseling:Addressing deficiencies in nutrients (e.g., iron, zinc) through dietary modifications or supplements if needed, as some cases of pica are linked to deficiencies. Environmental Modification:Reducing access to inappropriate substances and modifying the environment to prevent ingestion of harmful items. Close supervision and safe, monitored spaces may be necessary.
  • #79 A total symptom severity score (range - 0-80) can be obtained by summing the scores for each of the 20 items. DSM-5 symptom cluster severity scores can be obtained by summing the scores for the items within a given cluster, i.e., cluster B (items 1-5), cluster C (items 6-7), cluster D (items 8-14), and cluster E (items 15-20). A provisional PTSD diagnosis can be made by treating each item rated as 2 = "Moderately" or higher as a symptom endorsed, then following the DSM-5 diagnostic rule which requires at least: 1 B item (questions 1-5), 1 C item (questions 6-7), 2 D items (questions 8-14), 2 E items (questions 15-20). Initial research suggests that a PCL-5 cutoff score between 31-33 is indicative of probable PTSD across samples. However, additional research is needed. Further, because the population and the purpose of the screening may warrant different cutoff scores, users are encouraged to consider both of these factors when choosing a cutoff score.
  • #81 Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT): Trauma-Focused CBT (TF-CBT): Helps patients confront and process traumatic memories while learning healthier thought patterns and coping mechanisms. Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT): Focuses on modifying distorted thinking patterns related to trauma, such as guilt or self-blame. Prolonged Exposure Therapy (PE): Patients are gradually exposed to trauma-related stimuli in a controlled setting, helping to desensitize and reduce avoidance behaviors. Behavioral Modification Therapy:Positive reinforcement for consuming appropriate food. Negative reinforcement for inappropriate ingestion. Contingency management programs can be useful, where desirable behavior is rewarded (e.g., tokens, privileges).
  • #84 Nutritional Interventions Iron Supplements: Commonly recommended for individuals with pica (Burke & Smith, 1999; Katsiyannis et al., 1998). Some evidence of pica reduction after supplementation. Zinc Supplements: Effective in certain cases. Study in North Carolina: 54% of residents with pica had low zinc levels. Zinc supplementation reduced pica incidents from 23 to 4.3 per person over 2 weeks (Lofts et al., 1990). Psychological Interventions Counseling & Psychotherapy: Recommended for individuals without developmental disabilities (DD) where pica is linked to emotional or psychogenic issues (Santiago-Sanchez et al., 1996). Parental Requests: Psychological treatment sometimes requested by parents of children with pica (Roberts-Harewood & Davies, 2001). Lack of Data: No published data on the effectiveness of these treatments for individuals with DD. Pharmacological Interventions SSRIs (Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors): Frequently used for pica in individuals with or without DD (Katsiyannis et al., 1998; Kirchner, 2001). Case study: Pica significantly reduced with antidepressants in a person with DD and depression, but recurred when medication was stopped (Jawed et al., 1993). Behavioral Interventions Overcorrection: After pica is observed, individuals must spit out the item and engage in lengthy hygiene routines. Results show a 90% reduction in pica in some cases but may depend more on human interaction than the aversive treatment itself. Facial Screening/Physical Restraint: Life-threatening pica has been treated with physical restraints, such as helmets or camisoles, to prevent access to pica items. While somewhat effective, these methods raise concerns about social interaction and adaptive behavior reduction. Aversive Substances: Using substances like lemon juice, water mist, or ammonia to deter pica behavior has had mixed success. Negative Practice: Involves forcing a person to engage with non-food items without actually allowing ingestion. It has shown some success in reducing pica. Edible/Nonedible Discrimination Training: Designed to teach individuals to differentiate between food and non-food items. Results are mixed, and causality is unclear. Response Blocking and Redirection: Blocking the individual from engaging in pica behavior, combined with redirection to preferred activities, has reduced pica in some cases. Differential Reinforcement (DR): Reinforces alternative behaviors, such as chewing gum or eating snacks, to reduce the likelihood of pica. This approach has been effective in some instances. Ecological Approaches: Environmental control/modification has been used in pica interventions. Klein (1997) reported on a mother who formed a community task force to remove cigarette butts, while others used "pica proofing," increased supervision, and enriching environments with toys or activities to manage pica (Burke & Smith, 1999; Goh et al., 1999). Sensory Approaches: Sensory-based interventions involve replacing pica targets with similar safe items, like chewable toys or snacks with similar textures. For example, a "pica box" containing safe, edible alternatives was used to reduce pica in a child with autism (Hirsch & Myles, 1996)
  • #85 shared decision-making and collaborative care as vital early interventions. These approaches have been shown to enhance patient-centered care and treatment outcomes by improving psychoeducation on PTSD and reducing ambivalence about treatment options. Collaborative care, especially when integrated with telehealth, is linked to increased patient compliance and reduced risk of early treatment cessation. The primary recommendation for PTSD treatment is trauma-focused therapy. Studies now favor manualized trauma-focused therapies, such as Prolonged Exposure (PE), Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT), and Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR), over pharmacotherapy. These therapies involve a structured guide for therapists to address trauma in a systematic way, resulting in more consistent treatment outcomes. Research also supports newer therapies, including Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for PTSD, Narrative Exposure Therapy (NET), and Written Exposure Therapy, which have shown positive effects on PTSD symptoms. Written exposure therapy, in particular, is emerging as a therapy with good treatment retention and can be a middle ground for patients who find verbal retelling, such as in PE, challenging. Key points for trauma-focused therapy include: Individual, manualized therapy sessions lasting 12-16 weeks. New therapies like written exposure have shown promising outcomes. Telehealth is as effective as in-person therapy. Pharmacologic treatment for PTSD recommends SSRIs and SNRIs such as fluoxetine, paroxetine, sertraline, and venlafaxine. These medications have well-tolerated side effect profiles and have been shown to reduce PTSD symptoms, although therapy is preferred as it addresses the full symptom spectrum. Augmentation strategies, such as using prazosin for nightmares, have weak evidence, and benzodiazepines are not advised due to their potential harm. There is also insufficient evidence to support the use of alternative treatments like electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) or repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for PTSD.