Was ist der Unterschied zwischen robots.txt und meta robots?
Was ist der Unterschied zwischen Crawling und Indexierung?
Welche Inhalte crawlt Google?
Wie kann das Crawling optimiert werden?
Vortrag von Stephan Czysch zum Thema Logfile-Analysen auf der SEO Campixx 2014.
Entrepreneurship Summit 2015: Keynote von Prof. Dr. Günter FaltinWir sind das Kapital
Die Keynote Präsentation "Wir sind das Kapital - Aufruf zu einer intelligenteren Ökonomie" von Prof. Dr. Günter Faltin auf dem Entrepreneurship Summit 2015 in Berlin.
Title:
How FBI's Dylann Roof gun snafu hurts Obama's gun control agenda.
Authors:
Patrik Jonsson Staff writer
President Obama pushed Americans to call for stricter gun controls in the wake of the June 17 Charleston church massacre, complaining that the admitted killer, Dylann Roof, "had no trouble getting his hands on a gun."
What the President likely didn't know when he made those comments is this: It wasn't a lack of gun controls, but a bureaucratic failure, that led to Roof obtaining the gun legally, due, it turns out, on a senior FBI document examiner's unfamiliarity with South Carolina geography.
As such, details revealed Friday in the Dylann Roof case add to the complexity of the President's earlier call for a "greater sense of urgency" on gun safety, as FBI Director James Comey said Friday that the agency "felt sick" about its role in the Charleston tragedy – specifically, a failure to spot a drug charge that would have disqualified Roof from buying a gun on April 11.
According to Mr. Comey, a senior examiner started working on Roof's application on April 13, digging into the details of a drug arrest from earlier this year, which had the potential for disqualifying the application. But, being unfamiliar with South Carolina geography, she contacted the wrong law enforcement jurisdiction, which said it had no details on the arrest. A federal law allows the FBI three days to do a background check before either approving it or giving gun stores the discretion to sell the gun anyway.
By the end of that week, Roof had his murder weapon in hand.
For some commentators, the question now is whether a new focus on background checks and the FBI's admission that it flubbed Roof's application will affect public opinion over gun controls in an era where a recent government study found that the number of active shooter incidents rose from an average of 6.4 situations a year in 2007 to an average of 16.4 incidents in 2013.
The role of the government in preventing such tragedies is at the heart of the debate, which is deeply intertwined with America's long-running and complicated relationship with firearms ownership as guaranteed by the US Constitution.
At the same time, the "revving up of presidential campaigns for 2016 [have] increased the hostility" around the gun control debate, writes Aileen Graef for Sinclair Broadcast Group, which owns 162 TV stations in the US.
After a comprehensive gun safety bill failed to pass Congress following the Sandy Hook school massacre in late 2012, support for new gun controls has waned. Polls show only 47 percent of Americans now favoring stricter gun controls. There's other evidence that the US public has little appetite for new gun strictures. After all, 90 percent of NRA-backed candidates won their races in Election 2014.
And while the Charleston massacre forced South Carolina to reconsider its sanctioning of the Confederate battle flag, which Roof had posed with in photos and which t ...
New Yorks Cuomo calls for government shutdown over gun control la.docxhenrymartin15260
New York's Cuomo calls for government shutdown over gun control laws.
When it comes to guncontrol, wily centrist Gov. Andrew Cuomo (D) of New York is emerging as one of the most outspokenly partisan politicians in the country.
As one of the few chief executives in the nation to successfully champion guncontrollegislation in the aftermath of a domestic mass shooting, Governor Cuomo is casting himself as a leader on the issue.
Last week, after the shooting at Umpqua Community College in Roseburg, Ore., which killed nine people and injured nine others, Cuomo called the growing commonplace of such shootings a "blatant failure of our political system" and "a blatant failure of the elected officials in this country."
"I'd love to see the Democrats stand up and say we're going to shut down the government or threaten to shut down the government if we don't get real guncontrollegislation," Cuomo told a local cable news station, repeating it later to CNN. "It should be that high a priority."
Such displays of emotion are relatively rare for the New York governor, who has for the most part governed as a powerful centrist manager of a state divided by upstate conservatives and New York City liberals. But even before the Oregon shooting, Cuomo renewed urgent calls for guncontrol during a fiery and politically charged eulogy for one of his staff attorneys, Carey Gabay, who was shot and killed by a stray bullet in Brooklyn.
His call to Democrats in Washington is not likely to prompt action.
"He has an important position and a microphone," says Jeanne Zaino, a professor of political science at Iona College in New Rochelle, N.Y. "So to that extent he has some pull, but it is limited. Effective guncontrol at the federal level will likely take a strong push from a coalition of Republicans and Democrats who are able to sell their policy as nonpartisan and as a public health issue."
But as a vocal critic of partisan gridlock in Washington, Cuomo has made an art of working with Republicans – who control the state Senate with the help of a caucus of six renegade Democrats.
Weeks after the mass shootings at Sandy Hook Elementary in Newtown, Conn., in 2012, Cuomo secured support from the renegade caucus, and – citing poll numbers showing widespread support from New Yorkers – he succeeded in a vote on the NY SAFE Act. The new law expanded bans on assault weapons and magazines, bolstered background checks, required mental health officials to report patients with guns who may be dangerous, and instituted tougher penalties for gun crimes.
Cuomo told reporters Friday that he hoped New York's gun laws could be a "model for the nation."
"We passed the smartest guncontrollegislation in the nation in this state, and yes, it was hard, and yes, it cost me political capital, but it's probably one of the proudest things I've ever done because that law saves lives," he said.
New York has long been one of the strictest gun-control states in the nation, with laws requiring a license.
MATTER OVER MIND ARTICLESection CRIMINAL LAWThe Supreme Court.docxandreecapon
MATTER OVER MIND ARTICLE
Section: CRIMINAL LAW
The Supreme Court Is Poised to Review the Insanity Defense, an Issue That Has Confounded Courts, Psychiatrists and Lawyers
THE 911 CALLS BEGAN COMING JUST BEFORE 5 A.M. on June 21, 2000, from a residential neighborhood in Flagstaff, Ariz. The callers complained of a pickup repeatedly circling the block, blasting music.
Flagstaff police officer Jeff Moritz was dispatched to the area. Moments later, the sounds of at least a half-dozen gunshots pierced the predawn air. By the time the next officers arrived, the neighbors had emerged from their homes and were standing around someone lying in the street.
It was Moritz. One of the shots had struck the young officer and father through the armhole of his bulletproof vest, severing his aorta. He probably died within 30 seconds of being hit.
By day's end, 17-year-old Eric Michael Clark was in custody. In a bench trial three years later, a judge rejected Clark's insanity defense, convicted him of first-degree murder and sent him to prison for 25 years to life.
No one disputes that Clark shot Moritz. And no one denies that Clark, now 23, suffered from paranoid schizophrenia at the time. Nor does anyone say Clark should walk the streets anytime in the foreseeable future. The only question is whether Clark belongs in prison or a mental health facility.
The U.S. Supreme Court may help to answer the question after it hears Clark's challenge to Arizona's stripped-down insanity defense, which Clark says denied him a fair trial by not taking full account of his mental illness.
The case, Clark v. Arizona, No. 05-5966, marks the first time the justices will directly consider whether defendants have a constitutional right to claim insanity as a defense. Oral arguments are scheduled for April 19.
For David and Terry Clark, their son's criminal conviction represented the ultimate contradiction in terms. With one breath, the judge acknowledged Eric Clark's mental illness. With the next, he declared Clark rational and guilty.
"The judge said he was psychotic and delusional, yet he knew what he was doing," David Clark says. "If you look up those words in the dictionary, they don't even go together in the same sentence."
Dan and Janis Moritz couldn't disagree more. They say Clark knew exactly what he was doing when he gunned down their son.
"I think a lot of people are mentally ill, but that certainly shouldn't excuse them of responsibility for what they choose to do," says Dan Moritz, a psychologist with experience in evaluating criminal defendants' competency to stand trial. "I believe child molesters are mentally ill. I believe rapists are mentally ill. They punish them severely, and they should."
MAKING ILLNESS REPLACE INTENT
WHEN THE JUSTICES TAKE UP CLARK'S CASE, THEY WILL delve into an area that not only provokes public outrage at occasional acquittals in high-profile cases but also has long confounded judges, lawyers and jurors.
In a double-edged due p ...
Was ist der Unterschied zwischen robots.txt und meta robots?
Was ist der Unterschied zwischen Crawling und Indexierung?
Welche Inhalte crawlt Google?
Wie kann das Crawling optimiert werden?
Vortrag von Stephan Czysch zum Thema Logfile-Analysen auf der SEO Campixx 2014.
Entrepreneurship Summit 2015: Keynote von Prof. Dr. Günter FaltinWir sind das Kapital
Die Keynote Präsentation "Wir sind das Kapital - Aufruf zu einer intelligenteren Ökonomie" von Prof. Dr. Günter Faltin auf dem Entrepreneurship Summit 2015 in Berlin.
Title:
How FBI's Dylann Roof gun snafu hurts Obama's gun control agenda.
Authors:
Patrik Jonsson Staff writer
President Obama pushed Americans to call for stricter gun controls in the wake of the June 17 Charleston church massacre, complaining that the admitted killer, Dylann Roof, "had no trouble getting his hands on a gun."
What the President likely didn't know when he made those comments is this: It wasn't a lack of gun controls, but a bureaucratic failure, that led to Roof obtaining the gun legally, due, it turns out, on a senior FBI document examiner's unfamiliarity with South Carolina geography.
As such, details revealed Friday in the Dylann Roof case add to the complexity of the President's earlier call for a "greater sense of urgency" on gun safety, as FBI Director James Comey said Friday that the agency "felt sick" about its role in the Charleston tragedy – specifically, a failure to spot a drug charge that would have disqualified Roof from buying a gun on April 11.
According to Mr. Comey, a senior examiner started working on Roof's application on April 13, digging into the details of a drug arrest from earlier this year, which had the potential for disqualifying the application. But, being unfamiliar with South Carolina geography, she contacted the wrong law enforcement jurisdiction, which said it had no details on the arrest. A federal law allows the FBI three days to do a background check before either approving it or giving gun stores the discretion to sell the gun anyway.
By the end of that week, Roof had his murder weapon in hand.
For some commentators, the question now is whether a new focus on background checks and the FBI's admission that it flubbed Roof's application will affect public opinion over gun controls in an era where a recent government study found that the number of active shooter incidents rose from an average of 6.4 situations a year in 2007 to an average of 16.4 incidents in 2013.
The role of the government in preventing such tragedies is at the heart of the debate, which is deeply intertwined with America's long-running and complicated relationship with firearms ownership as guaranteed by the US Constitution.
At the same time, the "revving up of presidential campaigns for 2016 [have] increased the hostility" around the gun control debate, writes Aileen Graef for Sinclair Broadcast Group, which owns 162 TV stations in the US.
After a comprehensive gun safety bill failed to pass Congress following the Sandy Hook school massacre in late 2012, support for new gun controls has waned. Polls show only 47 percent of Americans now favoring stricter gun controls. There's other evidence that the US public has little appetite for new gun strictures. After all, 90 percent of NRA-backed candidates won their races in Election 2014.
And while the Charleston massacre forced South Carolina to reconsider its sanctioning of the Confederate battle flag, which Roof had posed with in photos and which t ...
New Yorks Cuomo calls for government shutdown over gun control la.docxhenrymartin15260
New York's Cuomo calls for government shutdown over gun control laws.
When it comes to guncontrol, wily centrist Gov. Andrew Cuomo (D) of New York is emerging as one of the most outspokenly partisan politicians in the country.
As one of the few chief executives in the nation to successfully champion guncontrollegislation in the aftermath of a domestic mass shooting, Governor Cuomo is casting himself as a leader on the issue.
Last week, after the shooting at Umpqua Community College in Roseburg, Ore., which killed nine people and injured nine others, Cuomo called the growing commonplace of such shootings a "blatant failure of our political system" and "a blatant failure of the elected officials in this country."
"I'd love to see the Democrats stand up and say we're going to shut down the government or threaten to shut down the government if we don't get real guncontrollegislation," Cuomo told a local cable news station, repeating it later to CNN. "It should be that high a priority."
Such displays of emotion are relatively rare for the New York governor, who has for the most part governed as a powerful centrist manager of a state divided by upstate conservatives and New York City liberals. But even before the Oregon shooting, Cuomo renewed urgent calls for guncontrol during a fiery and politically charged eulogy for one of his staff attorneys, Carey Gabay, who was shot and killed by a stray bullet in Brooklyn.
His call to Democrats in Washington is not likely to prompt action.
"He has an important position and a microphone," says Jeanne Zaino, a professor of political science at Iona College in New Rochelle, N.Y. "So to that extent he has some pull, but it is limited. Effective guncontrol at the federal level will likely take a strong push from a coalition of Republicans and Democrats who are able to sell their policy as nonpartisan and as a public health issue."
But as a vocal critic of partisan gridlock in Washington, Cuomo has made an art of working with Republicans – who control the state Senate with the help of a caucus of six renegade Democrats.
Weeks after the mass shootings at Sandy Hook Elementary in Newtown, Conn., in 2012, Cuomo secured support from the renegade caucus, and – citing poll numbers showing widespread support from New Yorkers – he succeeded in a vote on the NY SAFE Act. The new law expanded bans on assault weapons and magazines, bolstered background checks, required mental health officials to report patients with guns who may be dangerous, and instituted tougher penalties for gun crimes.
Cuomo told reporters Friday that he hoped New York's gun laws could be a "model for the nation."
"We passed the smartest guncontrollegislation in the nation in this state, and yes, it was hard, and yes, it cost me political capital, but it's probably one of the proudest things I've ever done because that law saves lives," he said.
New York has long been one of the strictest gun-control states in the nation, with laws requiring a license.
MATTER OVER MIND ARTICLESection CRIMINAL LAWThe Supreme Court.docxandreecapon
MATTER OVER MIND ARTICLE
Section: CRIMINAL LAW
The Supreme Court Is Poised to Review the Insanity Defense, an Issue That Has Confounded Courts, Psychiatrists and Lawyers
THE 911 CALLS BEGAN COMING JUST BEFORE 5 A.M. on June 21, 2000, from a residential neighborhood in Flagstaff, Ariz. The callers complained of a pickup repeatedly circling the block, blasting music.
Flagstaff police officer Jeff Moritz was dispatched to the area. Moments later, the sounds of at least a half-dozen gunshots pierced the predawn air. By the time the next officers arrived, the neighbors had emerged from their homes and were standing around someone lying in the street.
It was Moritz. One of the shots had struck the young officer and father through the armhole of his bulletproof vest, severing his aorta. He probably died within 30 seconds of being hit.
By day's end, 17-year-old Eric Michael Clark was in custody. In a bench trial three years later, a judge rejected Clark's insanity defense, convicted him of first-degree murder and sent him to prison for 25 years to life.
No one disputes that Clark shot Moritz. And no one denies that Clark, now 23, suffered from paranoid schizophrenia at the time. Nor does anyone say Clark should walk the streets anytime in the foreseeable future. The only question is whether Clark belongs in prison or a mental health facility.
The U.S. Supreme Court may help to answer the question after it hears Clark's challenge to Arizona's stripped-down insanity defense, which Clark says denied him a fair trial by not taking full account of his mental illness.
The case, Clark v. Arizona, No. 05-5966, marks the first time the justices will directly consider whether defendants have a constitutional right to claim insanity as a defense. Oral arguments are scheduled for April 19.
For David and Terry Clark, their son's criminal conviction represented the ultimate contradiction in terms. With one breath, the judge acknowledged Eric Clark's mental illness. With the next, he declared Clark rational and guilty.
"The judge said he was psychotic and delusional, yet he knew what he was doing," David Clark says. "If you look up those words in the dictionary, they don't even go together in the same sentence."
Dan and Janis Moritz couldn't disagree more. They say Clark knew exactly what he was doing when he gunned down their son.
"I think a lot of people are mentally ill, but that certainly shouldn't excuse them of responsibility for what they choose to do," says Dan Moritz, a psychologist with experience in evaluating criminal defendants' competency to stand trial. "I believe child molesters are mentally ill. I believe rapists are mentally ill. They punish them severely, and they should."
MAKING ILLNESS REPLACE INTENT
WHEN THE JUSTICES TAKE UP CLARK'S CASE, THEY WILL delve into an area that not only provokes public outrage at occasional acquittals in high-profile cases but also has long confounded judges, lawyers and jurors.
In a double-edged due p ...
Campus killer's purchases apparently within gun laws
1. Campus killer's purchases apparently within gun laws
Story Highlightso Judge in 2005 deemed Cho "imminent danger to himself" due to "mental illness"
o Tech shooter contacted by police for harassing women, speaking of suicide
o Cho bought 22-caliber pistol in February, 9 mm Glock in March
o Gun dealer "heartbroken," but "there was no reason for me to deny the sale"
(CNN) -- When Cho Seung-Hui purchased two handguns this year, he apparently followed the letter
of the law to get the weapons he eventually used in a shooting rampage on the Virginia Tech
campus.
Some questions have been raised over Cho's mental health and whether that should have prevented
him from being able to purchase the handguns.
A Virginia judge in December 2005 deemed Cho "an imminent danger to himself because of mental
illness" and ordered outpatient treatment for him, according to court documents. (Watch campus
shooting rekindle debate on gun control )
Special Justice Paul M. Barnett, who filled out the certification and order for involuntary admission
to a mental health facility, checked the box that said: "The alternatives to involuntary hospitalization
and treatment were investigated and deemed suitable."
"Only if I order them into a hospital is there any effect on their gun rights," Barnett told CNN on
Wednesday. (Read the judge's order - PDF)
Virginia and federal law prohibit the sale of guns to anyone who has been sent unwillingly to a
mental institution.
Police twice investigated Cho in the fall of 2005 after female students complained about his contacts
with them, university police Chief Wendell Flinchum said Wednesday. Neither of the women pressed
charges.
2. A former suite mate of Cho, who wished to be identified only as Andy, told CNN that Cho had
harassed three women and had spoken of suicide after a run-in with police.
"I told the cops that. And they took him away to the counseling center for a night or two," the
roommate said.
The Virginia State Police Web site features a 16-question "Firearms Purchase Eligibility Test." The
site says that answering yes to any of the queries means a person may not be able to purchase a
firearm.
Question 9 states: Have you ever been adjudicated legally incompetent, mentally incapacitated, or
been involuntarily committed to a mental institution?
Because Cho was not involuntarily committed to a mental institution, his appearance before the
judge and his evaluation at a mental health facility did not show up when he bought the guns.
Gun buyers are regulated by the laws of the state in which they live.
In Virginia, a person 21 or older can buy only one handgun a month, unless he has a license to buy
more. Cho bought one gun, a .22-caliber pistol, in early February and another, a 9 mm pistol, in
March.
Cho bought one of the guns he used in the shootings from an out-of-state dealer, according to Joe
Dowdy, the owner of the pawnshop across the street from campus where Cho picked up the Walther
P22 pistol on February 9.
Under federal law, a weapon purchased from an out-of-state dealer must be shipped to an in-state,
federally licensed gun dealer, who runs a background check. The buyer must appear in person to
pick up the gun, and the dealer receives a small fee -- usually between $20 and $40 -- for facilitating
the pickup.
Cho bought a Glock 19 and 50 rounds of ammunition on March 12, staying just within the limit of
one gun purchase per month, said John Markell at Roanoke Firearms in nearby Roanoke.
Even though Cho is a resident alien, Markell said, it was legal for him to purchase a firearm, and he
presented three forms of identification: a driver's license, a checkbook with an address matching the
driver's license, and a resident alien card. Cho moved to the United States from South Korea at age
8.
State police conducted an instant background check that probably took about a minute, the store
owner said.
Virginia law requires no waiting period, so Cho was able to legally take home the Glock on the same
day that he bought it.
Markell, whose daughter graduated from Virginia Tech in 1997, said he was "heartbroken" to find
out one of the guns came from his store. But, he said, "There was no reason for me to deny the sale."
Criminal defense attorney Daniel Gotlin told CNN he believes the easiest way to prevent similar
3. incidents in the future "is to not make guns so easily available to individuals with problems."
"Virginia has one of the easiest gun qualification laws in the whole United States," he said.
And Democratic Virginia Rep. Jim Moran said on the House floor: "It is simply too easy to obtain a
firearm."
But Jacob Sullum of Reason magazine says gun-control laws "disarm the law-abiding people, but
they leave the criminals free to attack their victims who have no defense."
"It's never been never demonstrated in any conclusive way that gun control reduces crime," he said.
CNN's Drew Griffin, Jeanne Meserve, Christine Romans and Michael Sevanof contributed to this
story.