This document provides a comparison of the James Bond films "From Russia with Love" (1963) and "Diamonds are Forever" (1971). Both films star Sean Connery as James Bond and are based on novels by Ian Fleming. While the films share similarities like Bond's character and his inevitable success, they differ in locations, plot details, and length. "Diamonds are Forever" spans the globe more and includes special effects, while "From Russia with Love" takes place primarily on a train. Both films feature Bond girls who initially oppose Bond but later assist him.

1. SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE, BUILDING AND DESIGN
THE DESIGN SCHOOL
FOUNDATION IN NATURAL BUILD ENVIRONMENT
NAME: TAN YIT FONG
STUDENT ID NO: 0319133
FILMS SELECTED: FROM RUSSIA WITH LOVE (1963) & DIAMONDS ARE FOREVER
(1971)
WORD COUNT: 661
ENGLISH 2 (ELG 30605)
WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT 1: COMPARE – CONTRAST ESSAY
LECTURER: CASSANDRA WIJESURIA
SUBMISSION DATE: 5TH
DECEMBER 2014

2. “From Russia with Love” and “Diamonds are Forever” are both films in the James
bond series starring Sean Connery with a decade long gap in between both their box
office releases. The two films are based on stories that are part of Ian Flemming’s
popular series of spy fiction James Bond novels published in 1956 and 1957
respectively. The Bond series in film are Hollywood classics in its own right. Highly
anticipated and watched by almost everyone who had a television at that time, I
chose these two movies
“From Russia with Love” is a story about the search for a Russian decoding machine,
known as Lektor that Bond needs to find before the evil SPECTRE organization
discovers it first. Whilst being romantically linked with Russian girl, Tatiana
Romanova, Bond sneaks his way around Istanbul, whilst each SPECTRE agent tries
to pick him off. On the other hand, “Diamonds are Forever” is a story about how after
Bond travels the world in his quest to kill Blofeld, his long-time arch nemesis, and
returns triumphant. The British Government becomes suspicious when large
shipments of uncut diamonds begin disappearing during transit. Bond goes
undercover as Peter Franks, diamond smuggler and now must resist the wiles of a
beautiful smuggler and survive the machinations of Blofeld's two assassins so that
he can uncover Blofeld's sinister plot.
The overarching similarity between both films is the character James Bond himself,
on one of his many missions, clad in his black suit and tie and slicked black hair.
With gun in hand and sometimes a brief case, he can solve any problem before it
goes out of hand. He always seems to know what to do in life-threatening times,
remaining calm and cool, and is always one step ahead of his nemesis. This leads
me to another obvious similarity; it is almost inevitable that James Bond would
succeed. He is the Mary Sue character whereby the odds are always in his favour

3. and he triumphs in both films.
However, even though both films share a similar ending, the road to it is definitely
different. In “From Russia with Love”, most scenes took place in a moving train on
road to Piccadilly, Britain while in “Diamonds are Forever” James Bond travels the
world, from Amsterdam to Los Angeles to Las Vegas with in-between scenes of the
South African diamond mines and an airplane en route to Germany. Hence,
“Diamonds are Forever” contains much more details and action in its plot that spans
120 minutes while “From Russia with Love” only spans 57 minutes. Not to mention in
“Diamonds are Forever” there were special effects showcasing explosion clouds and
satellites from outer space blowing up submarines.
Who could forget the alluring bond girls that add that extra spark as James Bond’s
love interest, completing James Bond’s character to have it all- intuition, strength,
desirability. Tatiana Romanova and Tiffany Case from “From Russia with Love” and
“Diamonds are Forever” respectively play henchmen against Bond at the beginning
of both movies and only to become his sidekicks later on. Both women would be
introduced and out by the next movie like many of the other Bond girls. Also, both
women end with an embrace on a cruise with James Bond himself- Romana on a
gondola in Venice while with Case it was on the RMS Queen Elizabeth cruise ship
headed for Britain, probably signifying that the relationship is only for the ride and
would end at land.
Hence all in all, I feel that these two movies showcase the progression of the
Hollywood scene over the years. In the 1963 film it was all about bringing the words
to life while on the other hand the 1971 film dramatized and expanded on the basic
plot provided by Ian Flemming. Although at the end of the day, basic skeleton of the

4. ‘Bond-on-mission’ story is what ties both movies and creates an immediately
recognizable series that has entertained the masses since the 1950s.