topics:
Formation of company
Lifting the corporate veil
Company’s management: duties and liabilities of company directors and other officers
White collar crime
Corporate scandal
Whistle blowing
Formation of company
Lifting the corporate veil
Company’s management: duties and liabilities of company directors and other officers
White collar crime
Corporate scandal
Whistle blowing
This PPT covers meaning and definition of company, features of company, association of company, memorandum of Association, Articles of Association, Prospectus, Promoters
Formation of company
Lifting the corporate veil
Company’s management: duties and liabilities of company directors and other officers
White collar crime
Corporate scandal
Whistle blowing
This PPT covers meaning and definition of company, features of company, association of company, memorandum of Association, Articles of Association, Prospectus, Promoters
Company: Meaning,characterstics and types.Sanjay Singh
DEFINATION OF COMPANY:-
Section 3 (1) (i) of the Companies Act, 1956 defines company as “a company formed and registered under this Act or an existing company”.
Section 3(1) (ii) Of the act states that “an existing
company means a company formed and
registered under any of the previous companies laws”.
Objects clause is contained in the memorandum of association and sets out the powers of the directors in running the company. Traditionally, each power of the company had to be enumerated, which resulted in detailed statements as to the powers of the company. Companies are now able to use the phrase 'to carry on the business of a general commercial company' rather than use exhaustive lists of enumerated powers.
Read more at Law Teacher: http://www.lawteacher.net/free-law-essays/company-law/the-doctrine-of-ultra-vires-company-law-essay.php#ixzz43wf5BqRy
This material is a part of our PGPSE programe. Our programme is available for any student after class 12th / graduation. AFTERSCHO☺OL conducts PGPSE, which is available free to all online students. There are no charges. It is designed to give a comprehensive training in social entrepreneurship / spiritual entrepreneurship. This programme is aimed at those persons, who want to ultimately set up their own business enterprises which can benefit society substantially. PGPSE is a unique programme, as it combines industry consultancy, business solutions and case studies in addition to spirituality and social concerns. You can read the details at www.afterschoool.tk or at www.afterschool.tk
Company: Meaning,characterstics and types.Sanjay Singh
DEFINATION OF COMPANY:-
Section 3 (1) (i) of the Companies Act, 1956 defines company as “a company formed and registered under this Act or an existing company”.
Section 3(1) (ii) Of the act states that “an existing
company means a company formed and
registered under any of the previous companies laws”.
Objects clause is contained in the memorandum of association and sets out the powers of the directors in running the company. Traditionally, each power of the company had to be enumerated, which resulted in detailed statements as to the powers of the company. Companies are now able to use the phrase 'to carry on the business of a general commercial company' rather than use exhaustive lists of enumerated powers.
Read more at Law Teacher: http://www.lawteacher.net/free-law-essays/company-law/the-doctrine-of-ultra-vires-company-law-essay.php#ixzz43wf5BqRy
This material is a part of our PGPSE programe. Our programme is available for any student after class 12th / graduation. AFTERSCHO☺OL conducts PGPSE, which is available free to all online students. There are no charges. It is designed to give a comprehensive training in social entrepreneurship / spiritual entrepreneurship. This programme is aimed at those persons, who want to ultimately set up their own business enterprises which can benefit society substantially. PGPSE is a unique programme, as it combines industry consultancy, business solutions and case studies in addition to spirituality and social concerns. You can read the details at www.afterschoool.tk or at www.afterschool.tk
This article is an excerpt of the Canada Chapter of International Liability of Corporate Directors, 2nd edition, published by Juris Publishing in February 2013. This excerpt excludes numerous aspects of the full chapter, particularly in reference to offering corporations, national corporate reporting, the supervisory role of the securities commissions, insider trading, prospectus violations, director loans and directors’ and officers’ liability insurance and indemnification of officers and directors. Further, some sections have been abridged. The full article should be consulted for the omitted aspects and for a more complete analysis of the applicable law. This article is not legal advice and is intended solely as information. Further information can be obtained from the authors.
In Canada, there is a large body of statutory and common law which provides guidance about the standards of conduct expected from directors and attaches personal liability for failing to meet those standards. Directors now owe expanded duties to shareholders, employees, creditors, and other stakeholders and are increasingly being held personally responsible for the corporation’s conduct. Liability attaches under the Canada Business Corporations Act (CBCA), and under provincial corporations acts, most of which are similar to the Ontario Business Corporations Act (OBCA). This article deals only with liabilities under business corporations.
The legal use of the word ‘person' has attracted an assortment of theories which is probably second to none in volume. ‘Person' in law, is both the recognition of an entity as well as the acknowledgement of such an entity's rights and interests. Granting of ‘personhood' states then enables an entity to undertake acts and relations that are recognized in the law. In the realm of law, the term ‘person' is nothing more than an abstraction - a representation through the form of an entity either real or artificial, of certain attributes.
Introduction and Overview of the Justice SystemCorporate ExiTatianaMajor22
Introduction and Overview of the Justice System
Corporate Existence and Liability
Fraud and Internal Controls
Week #1 Part #1
1
2
Federal Court Jurisdiction: Limited Jurisdiction
The term jurisdiction means the power to adjudicate. As the framers wrote the Constitution, some feared that the federal courts might threaten the independence of the states and the people. To combat this fear the framers set up a federal court system that can only hear cases in special circumstances. This is called courts of limited jurisdiction. Since the federal courts can only hear certain kinds of cases, most of the day-to-day cases that courts deal with happen in state courts.
Basically, federal courts hear only 2 types of cases; those that raise a federal question and those involving lawsuits between citizens of different states known as diversity of jurisdiction.
Also, all criminal tax cases are federal question jurisdiction arising under Title 18 or Title 26 of the U.S. Code. So, all criminal federal tax cases are filed in the federal district court.
Additional some civil tax cases are heard in the federal courts as well.
State Court Jurisdiction: General Jurisdiction
General Jurisdiction
The Tenth Amendment provides that “powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”
The ultimate effect these provisions have upon state courts is to reserve to them the right to hear and decide any legal matter not expressly reserved for the exclusive jurisdiction of federal courts (such as lawsuits between states).
Thus, state courts are courts of general jurisdiction. They hear all the cases not specifically selected for federal courts. Just as the federal courts interpret federal laws, state courts interpret state laws. Each state gets to make and interpret its own laws. This helps the states retain power, and makes sure that the national government does not become too strong.
The Tax Court: An Inferior Court
The United States Tax Court is a federal trial court of record established by Congress under Article I of the U.S. Constitution, section 8 of which provides (in part) that the Congress has the power to "constitute Tribunals inferior to the supreme Court".
When the taxpayer is called for an audit, the taxpayer has two choices: agree with the IRS or disagree.
If the taxpayer agrees, the case is over. If the taxpayer disagrees, the IRS sends the taxpayer a "notice of deficiency" (also called a 90-day Letter), stating the adjustments that the Service wants to make to the tax return. The taxpayer then has 90 days to file a petition with the Tax Court. If not filed within 90 days, the taxpayer has agreed with the IRS.
By going to the Tax Court, the taxpayer is suing the IRS in court.
The Tax Court consists of 19 judges who travel the circuit to all 50 states. Tax Court cases do not get tried before a jury. In a regular Tax Court case, i ...
NATURE, ORIGIN AND DEVELOPMENT OF INTERNATIONAL LAW.pptxanvithaav
These slides helps the student of international law to understand what is the nature of international law? and how international law was originated and developed?.
The slides was well structured along with the highlighted points for better understanding .
Responsibilities of the office bearers while registering multi-state cooperat...Finlaw Consultancy Pvt Ltd
Introduction-
The process of register multi-state cooperative society in India is governed by the Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002. This process requires the office bearers to undertake several crucial responsibilities to ensure compliance with legal and regulatory frameworks. The key office bearers typically include the President, Secretary, and Treasurer, along with other elected members of the managing committee. Their responsibilities encompass administrative, legal, and financial duties essential for the successful registration and operation of the society.
DNA Testing in Civil and Criminal Matters.pptxpatrons legal
Get insights into DNA testing and its application in civil and criminal matters. Find out how it contributes to fair and accurate legal proceedings. For more information: https://www.patronslegal.com/criminal-litigation.html
Car Accident Injury Do I Have a Case....Knowyourright
Every year, thousands of Minnesotans are injured in car accidents. These injuries can be severe – even life-changing. Under Minnesota law, you can pursue compensation through a personal injury lawsuit.
How to Obtain Permanent Residency in the NetherlandsBridgeWest.eu
You can rely on our assistance if you are ready to apply for permanent residency. Find out more at: https://immigration-netherlands.com/obtain-a-permanent-residence-permit-in-the-netherlands/.
PRECEDENT AS A SOURCE OF LAW (SAIF JAVED).pptxOmGod1
Precedent, or stare decisis, is a cornerstone of common law systems where past judicial decisions guide future cases, ensuring consistency and predictability in the legal system. Binding precedents from higher courts must be followed by lower courts, while persuasive precedents may influence but are not obligatory. This principle promotes fairness and efficiency, allowing for the evolution of the law as higher courts can overrule outdated decisions. Despite criticisms of rigidity and complexity, precedent ensures similar cases are treated alike, balancing stability with flexibility in judicial decision-making.
Military Commissions details LtCol Thomas Jasper as Detailed Defense CounselThomas (Tom) Jasper
Military Commissions Trial Judiciary, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Notice of the Chief Defense Counsel's detailing of LtCol Thomas F. Jasper, Jr. USMC, as Detailed Defense Counsel for Abd Al Hadi Al-Iraqi on 6 August 2014 in the case of United States v. Hadi al Iraqi (10026)
Introducing New Government Regulation on Toll Road.pdfAHRP Law Firm
For nearly two decades, Government Regulation Number 15 of 2005 on Toll Roads ("GR No. 15/2005") has served as the cornerstone of toll road legislation. However, with the emergence of various new developments and legal requirements, the Government has enacted Government Regulation Number 23 of 2024 on Toll Roads to replace GR No. 15/2005. This new regulation introduces several provisions impacting toll business entities and toll road users. Find out more out insights about this topic in our Legal Brief publication.
In 2020, the Ministry of Home Affairs established a committee led by Prof. (Dr.) Ranbir Singh, former Vice Chancellor of National Law University (NLU), Delhi. This committee was tasked with reviewing the three codes of criminal law. The primary objective of the committee was to propose comprehensive reforms to the country’s criminal laws in a manner that is both principled and effective.
The committee’s focus was on ensuring the safety and security of individuals, communities, and the nation as a whole. Throughout its deliberations, the committee aimed to uphold constitutional values such as justice, dignity, and the intrinsic value of each individual. Their goal was to recommend amendments to the criminal laws that align with these values and priorities.
Subsequently, in February, the committee successfully submitted its recommendations regarding amendments to the criminal law. These recommendations are intended to serve as a foundation for enhancing the current legal framework, promoting safety and security, and upholding the constitutional principles of justice, dignity, and the inherent worth of every individual.
A "File Trademark" is a legal term referring to the registration of a unique symbol, logo, or name used to identify and distinguish products or services. This process provides legal protection, granting exclusive rights to the trademark owner, and helps prevent unauthorized use by competitors.
Visit Now: https://www.tumblr.com/trademark-quick/751620857551634432/ensure-legal-protection-file-your-trademark-with?source=share
2. Topics
Formation of company
Lifting the corporate veil
Company’s management: duties and liabilities of company directors and
other officers
White collar crime
Corporate scandal
Whistle blowing
4. WHAT IS COMPANY ?
Definition
A legal entity, allowed by legislation, which permits a group of
people, as shareholders, to apply to the government for an
independent organization to be created, which can then focus on
pursuing set objectives, and empowered with legal rights to own
property, hire employees or loan and borrow money.
Legislation
Companies in Malaysia are governed by the Companies Act, 1965.
The Act is based on the Australian Uniform Companies Legislation
of 1961 & the United Kingdom’s Companies Act 1948.
5. TYPE OF COMPANIES
Type of
companies
Unlimited
liability
Ex: Sole
proprietor and
partnership
Limited
liability
Private limited
company
Public limited
company
6. WHAT IS CORPORATION ?
The process of
legally
declaring a
corporate
entity as
separate from
its owners,
Involves drafting
an "Articles of
Incorporation",
which lists the
primary purpose
of the business
and its location,
along with the
number of
shares and class
of stock being
issued, if any,
7. Types of business entity
Sole
proprietorship
Partnership
Limited liability
company
Corporation
Foreign
company
Foreign
company local
agent
8. INCORPORATION
CONSEQUENCES OF INCORPORATION , S16 (5) of Companies Act
1) Perpetual Succession
Everlasting and will continue until its properly wound up
Company will not be effected by changes such as death, transfer of shares,
resignation
It will not influence the privileges, immunities, estates and possessions of
company
Re Noel Tednan Holdings
2) Propriety interest
Ability of a company to own property like land and building
A company has right to acquire, hold and dispose of as well as transfer
property in its name
Maccura V. Northern Assurance Co, 1925
9. INCORPORATION,,,Cont’
3) Separate legal entity
It is a body corporate with the powers of an incorporated company
Salomon vs Salomon & Co Ltd [1897] AC 22
4) Demonstrated
Company may sue or be sued in its own name
Any wrong done to the company, only the company can take action
Foss vs. Harbottle (1843)
11. Lifting the Corporate Veil’
A legal term where the court allows a lawsuit
or prosecution to proceed against the
individual shareholders or directors of a
corporation instead of allowing them to be
protected from individual liability due to their
corporate status. This qualification prevents the
possible abuse of the separate entity principle
by unscrupulous traders. Therefore, there are
statutory as well as common law exception to
the principle in Salomon's case.
12. Law Applied In Corporate
Veil Lifting Circumstances
Misuse of Company Name.
Section 121(2)(c)
Signs or issues on its behalf on certain documents
Wrongful Trading.
Section 303(3) and 304(2)
The company has become insolvent but still continues to
contract debts.
Fraudulent Trading.
Section 304(1)
Company is carried for any fraudulent purposes
Payment Of Dividends Out Of Capital.
Section 365(2)
Dividens are paid even though there are no available profits
out of which to pay.
13. THE CASE
Mackt Logistic (M) Sdn Bhd
v.
Malaysian Airline System Bhd [2014]
2 MLJ 518
Court of Appeal.
14. THE CASE
Facts of case
Mackt Logistic (M) Sdn Bhd (“the Plaintiff”) carried business cargo transportation. The
Plaintiff deals with various airlines, which include Malaysia Airlines System (“the
Defendant”).
The two parties entered into a Sales Agency Agreement (“SAA”) on 5.5.1987.
The SAA requires the Plaintiff to provide a bank guarantee as a security for the payment of
the service provided by the Defendant.
The bank guarantee was for a period of 1.1.2002 until 31.12.2002 (“Guarantee Period”).
Nearing the end of the Guarantee Period, the Defendant issued the demand to the bank to
call on the guarantee.
There is no breach of the SAA but the Defendant stated that there were arrears of rental
due from another company known as Mackt HWT Freight Sdn Bhd under a tenancy
agreement and electricity charges.
Issues
Whether the Plaintiff and Mackt HWT Sdn Bhd is the same entity?
Whether the court can uplift the veil of the company and see who is the actual controller
of the Plaintiff?
15. Decision Of The High Court
Plaintiff and Mackt HWT Freight Sdn Bhd are two different legal entities,
When His Lordship decided to lift the veil of incorporation, there was no legal justification
or any special circumstances required by law to do so. (Tenaga Nasional Bhd v. Irham
Niaga Sdn Bhd & Anor [2011] 1 CLJ 491; [2011] 1 MLJ 752, CA, had this to say at p. 515 (CLJ);
p. 772 (MLJ)
(Tenaga Nasional Bhd v. Irham Niaga Sdn Bhd & Anor [2011] 1 CLJ 491; [2011] 1 MLJ 752,
CA, had this to say at p. 515 (CLJ); p. 772 (MLJ) - ‘You cannot simply raise the veil of
incorporation just because you feel that it is in the interest of justice. But if there is fraud,
then the veil of incorporation may be lifted.
In the Mackt HWT Freight v Malaysia Airline System, there was no fraud at all.’
THE CASE
17. ““A company is in law a person. But a company has no body to
be kicked & no soul to be damned, no hands with which to
work & no mind with which to think. It cannot act by itself. It
must work through the medium of some human being. The
question is, which humans represent that entity called
‘the company’? ”
Walter Woon (1991) Company Law
18. COMPANY’S MANAGEMENT
⊡ Every company has two organs:
□ members – express their decisions through
resolution passed in general meetings of the
company.
□ board of directors – decisions are reflected in the
resolutions of the board.
⊡ Thus, either of these organs can be the company.
19. DIRECTORS
⊡ Who is director?
□ S.4 Companies Act 1965: director includes any person occupying the position of
director of a corporation by whatever name called and includes a person in
accordance with whose directions or instructions the directors of a corporation are
accustomed to act and an alternate or substitute director.
⊡ S.122(1):Requirement for directors
□ Every company shall have at least two directors who each has his principal or only
place of residence within Malaysia.
⊡ S.122(2): Qualifications & disqualifications
□ that he be human, of full age & capacity (no other positive qualifications are
prescribed).
20. DIRECTORS
⊡Duties of directors
I. Fiduciary duties: s.132(1) - A director of a company shall at all times exercise his
powers for a proper purpose and in good faith in the best interest of the company.
3 Fiduciary duties :
□ must act honestly for the company’s interests.
□ must not place himself in a position where his duty to the company & his personal
interests may conflict
e.g. if a director obtains a benefit in circumstances where there could have been a
conflict of interest, he is accountable to the company for that benefit unless he has
disclosed it & obtained the approval of the company.
□ must employ the powers, information & assets that he is entrusted with the
purposes which they were given, and not for any collateral purpose.
21. DIRECTORS
II. Duty to display skill, standard of care & reasonable
diligence: s.132(1A) – A director of a company shall exercise
reasonable care, skill and diligence with:
(a) the knowledge, skill and experience which may reasonably
be expected of a director having the same responsibilities; and
(b) any additional knowledge, skill and experience which the
director in fact has.
III. Statutory duties: (Duties imposed by the Act). Example:
S.131: Disclosure of interests in contract, property, offices, etc.
22. DIRECTORS
“First a phone call, then a lunch meeting, the next thing you know
you’re getting the offer of a lifetime.”
⊡ Directors + officers of corporations, through their business
connections, or frequently come across, or are propositioned with
business opportunities outside of their employment…
□ Can they take it?
□ When is it possible for that individual to take advantage of them?
24. White collar crime
Known as economic crime, commercial crime and
corporate crime.
Defining white-collar crime as moral or ethical violations follows ideals inherent within
principles of what is known as natural law. Natural law focuses on behaviors or
activities that are defined as wrong because they violate the ethical principles of a
particular culture, subculture, or group. The immoral nature of the activities is seen as
the foundation for defining certain types of white-collar activities as criminal.
According to Sutherland (1983), white collar crime “approximately as a crime committed
by a person of respectability and high social status in the course of his occupation”
White-collar crime is a crime committed by a respectable and high-status job. Due to
these crimes committed by their high status in employment. Government officials or
managers of an organization or a company abusing public money for its own sake.
25. White collar crime
According to Dr. Yusof Nook (1993) and
Joseph Eby Ruin (1996), there are
3 main causes of white-collar crime:
1. Opportunities to
commit crime,
2. Situational
pressures on the
individuals, and
3. Issues pertaining to
integrity.
26. Example of white collar crime
-Sect. 415 to 420, Penal Code
-Deliberate deception to secure unfair or unlawful gain.
-2 types of fraud, civil wrong and criminal wrong.
-For example, a fraud victim may sue the fraud perpetrator to avoid the fraud
and recover monetary compensation.
-and a criminal wrong (example fraud perpetrator may be prosecuted and
imprisoned by governmental authorities)
- Anti-Corruption Act 1997
- Bribery is the offer or acceptance of anything of value in exchange for influence on
a government/public official or employee. Bribes can take the form of gifts or
payments of money in exchange for favourable treatment, such as awards of
government contracts. Other forms of bribes may include property, various goods,
privileges, services and favours
- Sect. 405 to 409, Penal Code
- An act by a trustee that is not authorised either by the trust document or by law. For
example, a breach of trust can occur if a trustee:
- Distributes trust assets to a beneficiary who is not entitled to them under the terms of
the trust document.
- Invests the trust fund in a way not permitted by his express or statutory powers of
investment.
27. Example of white collar crime
- Sections 16(b) and 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
- The trading of a public company's stock or other securities (such as
bonds or stock options) by individuals with access to non-public
information about the company.
Anti-Money Laundering Act 2001
criminals disguise the original ownership and control of the proceeds of
criminal conduct by making such proceeds appear to have derived from
a legitimate source. any act or attempted act to conceal or disguise the
identity of illegally obtained proceeds so that they appear to have
originated from legitimate sources
Computer Crimes Act 1997,Digital Signature Act 1997, Telemedicine Act
1997. Offences committed against individuals or group who have the
motive of the crime to damage the reputation of victim by internet
networks
Identity Theft and Assumption Deterrence Act of 1998
Deliberate use of someone else identity for financial advantages in company.
Someone using your personal information.
Identity theft is a form of stealing someone's personal information and pretending to be that person in
order to obtain financial resources or other benefits in that person's name without their consent.
28. THE CASE
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
v.
CHEW CHEE WAH
HIGH COURT MALAYA, JOHOR BAHRU
DATO' HJ. ABDUL MALIK BIN HJ. ISHAK J
[CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 41-16-1995]
10 OCTOBER 1995
29. THE CASE
The respondent was charged for criminal breach of trust of cash and cheques worth
RM45,544.90 punishable under s. 408 of the Penal Code. He pleaded guilty and after
considering the probation report and mitigation by his Counsel, the learned
Magistrate bound over the respondent in the sum of RM3,000 cash for a period of 3
years. The respondent, a sales executive, pocketed collections totalling RM45,544.90
belonging to his employer over a period of two weeks after he was employed. When
the police arrested him, a sum of RM1,010 was seized from the respondent, which
amount was restored to his employer. The respondent was 20 years 4 months and 16
days old at the time of the offence.
The public prosecutor appealed against the sentence imposed by the learned
Magistrate, arguing that the sentence was manifestly disproportionate to the offence
in view of the minimal custodial sentence of one (1) year under the amended s. 408
of the Penal Code. The respondent argued that he was a first offender having a good
family background and had pleaded guilty and that he should be given a chance to
be a good citizen as a term of imprisonment would do him no good.
31. ENRON CASE
Introduction
Enron Corporation was an American energy, commodities, and services company based in
Houston, Texas,
before its bankruptcy on December 2, 2001, Enron employed approximately 20,000 staff and
was one of the world’s leading electricity, natural gas, communications, and pulp and paper
companies, with claimed revenues of nearly $101 billion in 2000.
Achievements
Fortuned named Enron “America’s Most Innovative Company” for six consecutive years.
It was also an extensive futures trader, including sugar, coffee, grains, hog and other meat futures.
At the time of its bankruptcy filing in December 2001, Enron structured into seven distinct business units.
32. At the end of 2001, it was revealed that its reported financial condition was sustained
substantially by institutionalized, systematic and creatively planned accounting fraud, known
as the “Enron scandal”.
Enron has since become a popular symbol of willful corporate fraud and corruption.
Enron’s Fall
The Enron scandal was a financial scandal involving Enron Corporation and its accounting
firm Arthur Andersen, that was revealed in late 2001.
After a series of revelations involving irregular accounting procedures conducted throughout
the 1990s, Enron was on the verge of bankruptcy by November of 2001. A white knight rescue
attempt by a similar, smaller energy company, Dynegy, was not viable. Enron filed for
bankruptcy on December 2, 2001.
SCANDALS
33. Enron’s Business
Business Model
Deregulation generally led to lower prices and increased supply, it also introduced
increased volatility in gas prices.
Standard contract (old) allowed suppliers to interrupt gas supply without legal penalties.
Creating a natural gas “bank” (Enron)- Enron began offering utilities long-term fixed price
contracts for natural gas, typically at prices that assumed long-term declines in spot prices.
Off-balance sheet financing vehicles- special purpose entities (SPE) are to finance many of
these transactions.
Enron Online-the creation of the on-line trading model.
The gas trading model was a huge success. By 1992, Enron was the largest merchant of
natural gas in North America.
34. Accounting & The Fraud
REMARKABLE COMPANY
The world’s largest energy trader.
The total revenue was $100 billion in 2000. 7th of Top 500 in US.
Blue chip, $80 per share, 21 thousands employees globalization enterprise.
BANKRUPTCY
2001, an investment agency boss publicly doubts the profitability model of Enron,
the stock price decrease from $80 to $42 in August.
16, Oct. Enron announces the total loss for 3rd quarter was $618 million.
22, Oct. Enron was forced to admit do false account, profit total false nearly $600
million since 1997.
30, Nov. stock price falls to $0.26 per share.
2, Dec. formally apply for bankruptcy protection.
35. ACCOUNTING
METHOD
Enron’s nontransparent financial statements did not clearly depict its operations and finances with
shareholders.
Accrual accounting: actual costs and actual revenues were received and recorded when selling it.
Mark-to-market accounting: income was estimated as the Present value of future cash flow, but costs
were hard to be recorded.
Example:
In July 2000, Enron and Blockbuster Video signed a 20-year agreement to introduce a new on-line
video game to various cities.
After several pilot projects, Enron estimated profits of more than $110 million form the deal, even
thought analysts questioned the technical viability and market demand of the service.
When the net work failed to work, Blockbuster pulled out of the contract, Enron continued to
recognized future profits, even thought the deal resulted in a loss.
37. The state accounting committee was an independent body established in accordance with the
state Accountant Acts. At the national level, the Uniform Certified Public Accountants Act was
just a template method, does not have binding enforce.
American institute of CPA and State Certified General Accountants Association were
traditional civil society organizations, not specially authorized by law.
The independence of the CPA.
BUSINESS ETHICS
HOW ABOUT THE CEO AND DIRECTORS DEAL WITH FRAUD?
Obviously, the top management operated the problem in very well, but all of they
intentionally less of attention about the fraud. Including the CEO skilling, many of the
directors were continuing advocated to rise stock price, but selling the stock at the same time.
Both of they have no business ethics and no long- term development. (1985-2001
Enron)Where there is a business ethic, there is a long-term bloom.
US MONITOR SYSTEM
38. Ethics can’t be fragmented…or fragmentation goes against ethics.
Company governance must integrate the active participation of all stakeholders
who affect the organization’s activities or who are affected by these activities.
And in all four domains: profitability, equity, dignity and viability.
Also encourage this fragmentation (shadow)
ARTHUR ANDERSEN
In July 2002, the one-time Big 5 accounting firm was found guilty of obstruction
of justice for shredding documents in the Enron case.
Their Enron connections essentially put the entire firm out of business, affecting
22,000 workers, most of whom had no connection to Enron.
LESSONS TO LEARN FROM THIS CASE
40. “‘’ Too see wrong and not to expose it , is to
become a silent partner to its continuance.’’
Dr , John Raymond Baker
41. Whistleblowing: Definition
o A whistleblower is an employee, former employee, or
member of an organization, especially a business or
government agency, who reports misconduct to people or
entities that have the power and presumed willingness to
take corrective.
o Generally the misconduct is a violation of law, rule,
regulation and/or a direct threat to public interest, such
as fraud, health/safety violations, and corruption .
42. Kinds Of Whistle Blowing
Internal
who report
misconduct on a
fellow employee or
superior within
their company.
Personal
Blowing the whiste
on the offender,
here the charge is
not against the
organization or
system but against
one individual .
Impersonal
External Whistle
Blowing.
43. Whistleblowing Benefits
o Whistleblowing leads to good and bad results. First, the benefits
of carefully considered whistleblowing can lead to the end of
unethical business parctices . The lives of individuals and whole
communities have been saved by whistleblowers .
o The actions of whistleblowers are potentially beneficial to
society . Businesses that engaged in unethical practices have
been shut down because of the actions of whistleblowers .
Whistleblowing
44. How To Blow The Whistle ?
Do it anonymously Do it in a group Present just the evidence
45. Are Whistleblowers
honored as heroes ?
Rarely whistleblower are honored as heroes
by their fellow workers, for the following
reasons.
⊡ They doubt their loyalty .
⊡ They are perceived as a traitors .
⊡ They are perceived as someone who has
damage the firm – the working family to
which he/she belongs .
46. Whistleblower
Protection Act 2010
Legislative protection in Malaysia of whistleblowers is not an entirely new concept.
Legislation mandating personnel to disclose the existence of offences involving fraud or
dishonesty, and the attendant legal protections, already exist in certain sectors.
The Whistleblower Protection Act 2010 (“WPA”), which came into force on 15 December
2010, is intended to provide all-encompassing protection to the private and public sectors.
One of the WPA’s key objectives is to fill in the gaps left by the said sectoral-specific
legislation.
The Malaysian Parliament provides protection for whistleblowers through a few Acts of
Parliament.
A. Companies Act 1965 (Act 125) and Capital Services Act 2007 (Act 671)
B. Whistleblower Protection Act 2010 (Act 711)
47. THE CASE
ROKIAH & Borhan
vs. Companies Commission of
Malaysia
CASE HIGH COURT MALAYA,
KUALA LUMPUR
48. THE CASE
Hjh Rokiah binti Mhd Noor
Deputy CEO (Operations),
Companies Commission of
Malaysia
Azryain bin Borhan
Director,
Companies Commission of
Malaysia Training Academy
Applicants
49. Rokiah was at all material times the Deputy CEO (Operations) while Azryain
was the Director of Training Academy of CCM. In a joint effort both decided to
co-author the earnest worded letter dated 25 October 2011, no less entitled
'Integrity And Leadership Crisis In The Company Commission Of Malaysia'.
This letter was addressed to the chairman and board members of CCM. Both
also thought it fit to carbon copy the letter to the highest level. For their piece,
the Prime Minister, Deputy Prime Minister, Chief Secretary to the
Government, Minister of Domestic Trade, Co-operatives and Consumerism,
Chief Commissioner of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission ('MACC')
and Director of Investigation of MACC were all requested to give a thought on
what they had penned regarding their version of the state of affairs at their
office .
THE CASE
50. THE CASE
The first action that was taken by CCM regarding this letter is to discuss the same in a
Special Commission's meeting on 19 December 2011. It was resolved in this meeting that
CCM's Chief Executive Officer ('CEO') is to investigate the issues arising from the
issuance of the letter
Accordingly thereafter the CEO appointed four members for the Disciplinary
Secretariat ('DS') for the Disciplinary Proceedings ('DP') against the applicants.
On 5 April 2012 the DS issued two recommendation papers for the DC indicating there is
a prima facie case against both applicants. The DC on the same date deliberated and
agree that there is pursuant to reg. 35(2) of the Second Schedule of the SBA a prima
facie case against both applicants.
Accordingly the DC met on 31 October 2012 and unanimously decided that Rokiah and
Azryain are guilty of the all the relevant charges against both and recommended that
Rokiah be dismissed and Azryain be demoted by one grade The DC met on 28
November 2012 to decide the appropriate mode to terminate her employment after she
was found guilty.
51. Whistleblower Protection Act 2010 in the case
The applicants also submitted both the Minister and CCM failed to take into account
s. 10(1) and s. 10(3) of the Whistleblower Protection Act 2010 ('WPA') which respectively states:
‘’No person shall take detrimental action against a whistleblower or any person related to or
associated with the whistleblower in reprisal for a disclosure of improper conduct.’’
In this regard, the applicants contended that they had written the letter only with the best
interest of CCM in their minds and they only wanted that actions be taken appropriately to
redress their versions of the unhealthy and damaging events happening at their place of work.
Instead it is most unfair, perverse and irrational for CCM and contrary to the provisions of the
WPA that disciplinary action is taken against them. Such action is "detrimental action against a
whistleblower" contrary to the provision of s. 10(3) of WPA
THE CASE
52. The rule ‘You should neglect your duties’ cannot
be made universal so therefore the action cannot
be morally right. A consequentialist still might
argue that the harm caused to the company by
the employee’s neglect is not as significant as the
harm caused by the company’s wrongdoing to
the community so therefore the action of whistle-
blowing is an ethical action after attempting to
right the wrong through internal means.
THE CASE
The deontologist might say ;
The applicants' letter
dated 25 October
2011 was circulated
to third parties……is
this an ethical action
???
53. Would be morally obliged to report the matter
to third parties, as this would likely bring
about the most happiness and least harm.
Hence in a ‘general’ context and testing the
Utilitarian theory, the option; reporting to
third parties is the morally correct action to
take.
THE CASE
The Utilitarian ;
THE SAME QUESTON