Cancer screening - Evidence, Expected benefits, Methods and Current Recommend...Alok Gupta
The presentation discusses about Cancer screening - Evidence, Expected benefits, Methods and Current Recommendations.
The was presented in HEALTH CONNECT meeting at Max Hospital, Saket, new Delhi in 2016.
The talk I gave at Uncubed NYC 2015. Goes over the different dimensions of a data science project, and shows the entire process through the example of a passion project: Movie vs Movie.
What are your top ten favorite movies of all time? This is a very difficult question. But why? I explain the challenges of measuring how much we like movies, books, songs, or products; combining insights from diverse sources like the Netflix Prize, Duncan Watts' social experiments, or the beginnings of Facebook. The better we get at measuring and ranking levels of enjoyment, the better we can customize websites, sort search results, find other people with similar tastes, and recommend products, so can we overcome these challenges? Drumroll... Yes, we can.
While Movie vs Movie answers a personal question I'm passionate about, it gives a lot of insights for the entertainment industry, and the backbone process for answering business questions is the same.
Deep Learning Reveals the Essence of Matt DamonIrmak Sirer
Using Generative Adversarial Networks to explore transitions between different faces, face arithmetic, and how the generator neural networks in this framework think of the face of movie stars in the abstract, general sense (including others that look at least as good as movie stars, such as the presenter of this talk, as a humble example). This is an adventure in searching for the platonic ideals of Matt Damon, George Clooney, and most important of them all, Irmak Sirer.
All work done in Tensorflow, standing on the shoulders of Taehoon Kim and Brandon Amos, who implemented the necessary foundations of GANs in Tensorflow. All the code I built upon that is open and accessible with an MIT license here: https://github.com/frrmack/dcgan-facemath-tensorflow
Cancer screening - Evidence, Expected benefits, Methods and Current Recommend...Alok Gupta
The presentation discusses about Cancer screening - Evidence, Expected benefits, Methods and Current Recommendations.
The was presented in HEALTH CONNECT meeting at Max Hospital, Saket, new Delhi in 2016.
The talk I gave at Uncubed NYC 2015. Goes over the different dimensions of a data science project, and shows the entire process through the example of a passion project: Movie vs Movie.
What are your top ten favorite movies of all time? This is a very difficult question. But why? I explain the challenges of measuring how much we like movies, books, songs, or products; combining insights from diverse sources like the Netflix Prize, Duncan Watts' social experiments, or the beginnings of Facebook. The better we get at measuring and ranking levels of enjoyment, the better we can customize websites, sort search results, find other people with similar tastes, and recommend products, so can we overcome these challenges? Drumroll... Yes, we can.
While Movie vs Movie answers a personal question I'm passionate about, it gives a lot of insights for the entertainment industry, and the backbone process for answering business questions is the same.
Deep Learning Reveals the Essence of Matt DamonIrmak Sirer
Using Generative Adversarial Networks to explore transitions between different faces, face arithmetic, and how the generator neural networks in this framework think of the face of movie stars in the abstract, general sense (including others that look at least as good as movie stars, such as the presenter of this talk, as a humble example). This is an adventure in searching for the platonic ideals of Matt Damon, George Clooney, and most important of them all, Irmak Sirer.
All work done in Tensorflow, standing on the shoulders of Taehoon Kim and Brandon Amos, who implemented the necessary foundations of GANs in Tensorflow. All the code I built upon that is open and accessible with an MIT license here: https://github.com/frrmack/dcgan-facemath-tensorflow
The presentation describes various facts about breast and cervical cancer including burden of disease, survival outcomes, need for early diagnosis and screening recommendations.
Routine Pap smears (also known as Pap tests) are an important part of protecting your health because they can help prevent cervical cancer or find it early. But learning your results are abnormal can cause some anxiety, and you may find yourself wondering what comes next. Join Dr. Sarah Feldman, a gynecologic oncologist at Brigham and Women’s Hospital, as she breaks down what abnormal results mean, what happens after, and why it’s important to follow up on an abnormal Pap smear.
The presentation describes various facts about breast and cervical cancer including burden of disease, survival outcomes, need for early diagnosis and screening recommendations.
Routine Pap smears (also known as Pap tests) are an important part of protecting your health because they can help prevent cervical cancer or find it early. But learning your results are abnormal can cause some anxiety, and you may find yourself wondering what comes next. Join Dr. Sarah Feldman, a gynecologic oncologist at Brigham and Women’s Hospital, as she breaks down what abnormal results mean, what happens after, and why it’s important to follow up on an abnormal Pap smear.
Show drafts
volume_up
Empowering the Data Analytics Ecosystem: A Laser Focus on Value
The data analytics ecosystem thrives when every component functions at its peak, unlocking the true potential of data. Here's a laser focus on key areas for an empowered ecosystem:
1. Democratize Access, Not Data:
Granular Access Controls: Provide users with self-service tools tailored to their specific needs, preventing data overload and misuse.
Data Catalogs: Implement robust data catalogs for easy discovery and understanding of available data sources.
2. Foster Collaboration with Clear Roles:
Data Mesh Architecture: Break down data silos by creating a distributed data ownership model with clear ownership and responsibilities.
Collaborative Workspaces: Utilize interactive platforms where data scientists, analysts, and domain experts can work seamlessly together.
3. Leverage Advanced Analytics Strategically:
AI-powered Automation: Automate repetitive tasks like data cleaning and feature engineering, freeing up data talent for higher-level analysis.
Right-Tool Selection: Strategically choose the most effective advanced analytics techniques (e.g., AI, ML) based on specific business problems.
4. Prioritize Data Quality with Automation:
Automated Data Validation: Implement automated data quality checks to identify and rectify errors at the source, minimizing downstream issues.
Data Lineage Tracking: Track the flow of data throughout the ecosystem, ensuring transparency and facilitating root cause analysis for errors.
5. Cultivate a Data-Driven Mindset:
Metrics-Driven Performance Management: Align KPIs and performance metrics with data-driven insights to ensure actionable decision making.
Data Storytelling Workshops: Equip stakeholders with the skills to translate complex data findings into compelling narratives that drive action.
Benefits of a Precise Ecosystem:
Sharpened Focus: Precise access and clear roles ensure everyone works with the most relevant data, maximizing efficiency.
Actionable Insights: Strategic analytics and automated quality checks lead to more reliable and actionable data insights.
Continuous Improvement: Data-driven performance management fosters a culture of learning and continuous improvement.
Sustainable Growth: Empowered by data, organizations can make informed decisions to drive sustainable growth and innovation.
By focusing on these precise actions, organizations can create an empowered data analytics ecosystem that delivers real value by driving data-driven decisions and maximizing the return on their data investment.
Adjusting primitives for graph : SHORT REPORT / NOTESSubhajit Sahu
Graph algorithms, like PageRank Compressed Sparse Row (CSR) is an adjacency-list based graph representation that is
Multiply with different modes (map)
1. Performance of sequential execution based vs OpenMP based vector multiply.
2. Comparing various launch configs for CUDA based vector multiply.
Sum with different storage types (reduce)
1. Performance of vector element sum using float vs bfloat16 as the storage type.
Sum with different modes (reduce)
1. Performance of sequential execution based vs OpenMP based vector element sum.
2. Performance of memcpy vs in-place based CUDA based vector element sum.
3. Comparing various launch configs for CUDA based vector element sum (memcpy).
4. Comparing various launch configs for CUDA based vector element sum (in-place).
Sum with in-place strategies of CUDA mode (reduce)
1. Comparing various launch configs for CUDA based vector element sum (in-place).
Chatty Kathy - UNC Bootcamp Final Project Presentation - Final Version - 5.23...John Andrews
SlideShare Description for "Chatty Kathy - UNC Bootcamp Final Project Presentation"
Title: Chatty Kathy: Enhancing Physical Activity Among Older Adults
Description:
Discover how Chatty Kathy, an innovative project developed at the UNC Bootcamp, aims to tackle the challenge of low physical activity among older adults. Our AI-driven solution uses peer interaction to boost and sustain exercise levels, significantly improving health outcomes. This presentation covers our problem statement, the rationale behind Chatty Kathy, synthetic data and persona creation, model performance metrics, a visual demonstration of the project, and potential future developments. Join us for an insightful Q&A session to explore the potential of this groundbreaking project.
Project Team: Jay Requarth, Jana Avery, John Andrews, Dr. Dick Davis II, Nee Buntoum, Nam Yeongjin & Mat Nicholas
Levelwise PageRank with Loop-Based Dead End Handling Strategy : SHORT REPORT ...Subhajit Sahu
Abstract — Levelwise PageRank is an alternative method of PageRank computation which decomposes the input graph into a directed acyclic block-graph of strongly connected components, and processes them in topological order, one level at a time. This enables calculation for ranks in a distributed fashion without per-iteration communication, unlike the standard method where all vertices are processed in each iteration. It however comes with a precondition of the absence of dead ends in the input graph. Here, the native non-distributed performance of Levelwise PageRank was compared against Monolithic PageRank on a CPU as well as a GPU. To ensure a fair comparison, Monolithic PageRank was also performed on a graph where vertices were split by components. Results indicate that Levelwise PageRank is about as fast as Monolithic PageRank on the CPU, but quite a bit slower on the GPU. Slowdown on the GPU is likely caused by a large submission of small workloads, and expected to be non-issue when the computation is performed on massive graphs.
5. P(A) =
| A |
|U |
If
I
picked
a
random
person
from
the
universe,
what
is
the
probability
of
him/her
having
cancer?
6.
7. People
that
test
posiCve
for
cancer
People
that
test
negaCve
for
cancer
Everybody
8. P(B) =
| B |
|U |
If
I
picked
a
random
person
from
the
universe,
what
is
the
probability
of
him/her
tesCng
posiCve
for
cancer?
9.
10. People
without
cancer
that
test
posiCve
People
without
cancer
that
test
negaCve
People
with
cancer
that
test
posiCve
People
with
cancer
that
test
negaCve
11. People
without
cancer
that
test
posiCve
(B
–
AB)
People
with
cancer
that
test
posiCve
People
with
cancer
that
test
negaCve
(A
–
AB)
People
without
cancer
that
test
negaCve
12. P(A, B) =
| AB |
|U |
If
I
picked
a
random
person
from
the
universe,
what
is
the
prob.
of
them
having
cancer
AND
tesCng
posiCve
for
cancer?
Joint
probability
13. P(A | B) =
| AB |
| B |
If
I
picked
a
random
person
that
tested
posi.ve,
what
is
the
prob.
of
him/her
actually
having
cancer?
CondiConal
probability
14. If
I
picked
a
random
person
that
tested
posi.ve,
what
is
the
prob.
of
him/her
actually
having
cancer?
CondiConal
probability
P(A | B) =
| AB |
| B |
15. If
I
picked
a
random
person
that
tested
posi.ve,
what
is
the
prob.
of
him/her
actually
having
cancer?
P(A | B) =
| AB |
| B |
=
| AB | |U |
| B | |U |
=
P(A, B)
P(B)
16. P(B | A) =
| AB |
| A |
If
I
picked
a
random
person
that
has
cancer,
what
is
the
prob.
of
him/her
tesCng
posiCve?
CondiConal
probability
17. P(B | A) =
| AB |
| A |
If
I
picked
a
random
person
that
has
cancer,
what
is
the
prob.
of
him/her
tesCng
posiCve?
CondiConal
probability
18. If
I
picked
a
random
person
that
has
cancer,
what
is
the
prob.
of
him/her
tesCng
posiCve?
P(B | A) =
| AB |
| A |
=
| AB | |U |
| A | |U |
=
P(A, B)
P(A)
19. P(A | B) =
P(A, B)
P(B)
P(test
posiCve
|
has
cancer)
P(B | A) =
P(A, B)
P(A)
P(has
cancer
|
test
posiCve)
20. P(A, B) = P(A | B)P(B)P(B | A)P(A) = P(A, B)
P(test
posiCve
|
has
cancer)
P(has
cancer
|
test
posiCve)
21. = P(A | B)P(B)P(B | A)P(A) = P(A, B)
P(test
posiCve
|
has
cancer)
P(has
cancer
|
test
posiCve)
22. P(B | A)P(A) = P(A | B)P(B)
P(test
posiCve
|
has
cancer)
P(has
cancer
|
test
posiCve)
23. P(test
posiCve
|
has
cancer)
P(B | A)P(A) = P(A | B)P(B)
P(has
cancer
|
test
posiCve)
P(test
posiCve)
P(has
cancer)
24. P(A | B) =
P(B | A)P(A)
P(B)
P(test
posiCve
|
has
cancer)
P(has
cancer|
test
posiCve)
P(test
posiCve)
P(has
cancer)
25. P(test
posiCve
|
has
cancer)
P(has
cancer|
test
posiCve)
P(test
posiCve)
P(has
cancer)
1%
of
women
at
age
forty
who
parCcipate
in
rouCne
screening
have
breast
cancer.
80%
of
women
with
breast
cancer
will
get
posiCve
mammograms.
9.6%
of
women
without
breast
cancer
will
also
get
posiCve
mammograms.
A
woman
in
this
age
group
had
a
posiCve
mammography
in
a
rouCne
screening.
What
is
the
probability
that
she
actually
has
breast
cancer?
26. P(test
posiCve
|
has
cancer)
P(has
cancer|
test
posiCve)
P(test
posiCve)
P(has
cancer)
1%
of
women
at
age
forty
who
parCcipate
in
rouCne
screening
have
breast
cancer.
80%
of
women
with
breast
cancer
will
get
posiCve
mammograms.
9.6%
of
women
without
breast
cancer
will
also
get
posiCve
mammograms.
A
woman
in
this
age
group
had
a
posiCve
mammography
in
a
rouCne
screening.
What
is
the
probability
that
she
actually
has
breast
cancer?
P(has
cancer)
=
0.01
27. P(test
posiCve
|
has
cancer)
P(has
cancer|
test
posiCve)
P(test
posiCve)
P(has
cancer)
1%
of
women
at
age
forty
who
parCcipate
in
rouCne
screening
have
breast
cancer.
80%
of
women
with
breast
cancer
will
get
posiCve
mammograms.
9.6%
of
women
without
breast
cancer
will
also
get
posiCve
mammograms.
A
woman
in
this
age
group
had
a
posiCve
mammography
in
a
rouCne
screening.
What
is
the
probability
that
she
actually
has
breast
cancer?
P(has
cancer)
=
0.01
P(test
posiCve
|
has
cancer)
=
0.80
28. P(test
posiCve
|
has
cancer)
P(has
cancer|
test
posiCve)
P(test
posiCve)
P(has
cancer)
1%
of
women
at
age
forty
who
parCcipate
in
rouCne
screening
have
breast
cancer.
80%
of
women
with
breast
cancer
will
get
posiCve
mammograms.
9.6%
of
women
without
breast
cancer
will
also
get
posiCve
mammograms.
A
woman
in
this
age
group
had
a
posiCve
mammography
in
a
rouCne
screening.
What
is
the
probability
that
she
actually
has
breast
cancer?
P(has
cancer)
=
0.01
P(test
posiCve
|
has
cancer)
=
0.80
P(test
posiCve)
=
P(test
posiCve|has
cancer)
P(has
cancer)
+
P(test
posiCve|not
cancer)
P(not
cancer)
29. P(test
posiCve
|
has
cancer)
P(has
cancer|
test
posiCve)
P(test
posiCve)
P(has
cancer)
1%
of
women
at
age
forty
who
parCcipate
in
rouCne
screening
have
breast
cancer.
80%
of
women
with
breast
cancer
will
get
posiCve
mammograms.
9.6%
of
women
without
breast
cancer
will
also
get
posiCve
mammograms.
A
woman
in
this
age
group
had
a
posiCve
mammography
in
a
rouCne
screening.
What
is
the
probability
that
she
actually
has
breast
cancer?
P(has
cancer)
=
0.01
P(test
posiCve
|
has
cancer)
=
0.80
P(test
posiCve)
=
P(test
posiCve|has
cancer)
P(has
cancer)
+
P(test
posiCve|not
cancer)
P(not
cancer)
=
0.80
P(has
cancer)
+
0.096
P(not
cancer)
30. P(test
posiCve
|
has
cancer)
P(has
cancer|
test
posiCve)
P(test
posiCve)
P(has
cancer)
1%
of
women
at
age
forty
who
parCcipate
in
rouCne
screening
have
breast
cancer.
80%
of
women
with
breast
cancer
will
get
posiCve
mammograms.
9.6%
of
women
without
breast
cancer
will
also
get
posiCve
mammograms.
A
woman
in
this
age
group
had
a
posiCve
mammography
in
a
rouCne
screening.
What
is
the
probability
that
she
actually
has
breast
cancer?
P(has
cancer)
=
0.01
P(test
posiCve
|
has
cancer)
=
0.80
P(test
posiCve)
=
P(test
posiCve|has
cancer)
P(has
cancer)
+
P(test
posiCve|not
cancer)
P(not
cancer)
=
0.80
P(has
cancer)
+
0.096
P(not
cancer)
=
0.80
*
0.01
+
0.096*(
1
–
0.80
)
31. P(test
posiCve
|
has
cancer)
P(has
cancer|
test
posiCve)
P(test
posiCve)
P(has
cancer)
1%
of
women
at
age
forty
who
parCcipate
in
rouCne
screening
have
breast
cancer.
80%
of
women
with
breast
cancer
will
get
posiCve
mammograms.
9.6%
of
women
without
breast
cancer
will
also
get
posiCve
mammograms.
A
woman
in
this
age
group
had
a
posiCve
mammography
in
a
rouCne
screening.
What
is
the
probability
that
she
actually
has
breast
cancer?
P(has
cancer)
=
0.01
P(test
posiCve
|
has
cancer)
=
0.80
P(test
posiCve)
=
P(test
posiCve|has
cancer)
P(has
cancer)
+
P(test
posiCve|not
cancer)
P(not
cancer)
=
0.80
P(has
cancer)
+
0.096
P(not
cancer)
=
0.80
*
0.01
+
0.096*(
1
–
0.80
)
P(test
posiCve)
=
0.103
32. P(test
posiCve
|
has
cancer)
P(has
cancer|
test
posiCve)
P(test
posiCve)
P(has
cancer)
1%
of
women
at
age
forty
who
parCcipate
in
rouCne
screening
have
breast
cancer.
80%
of
women
with
breast
cancer
will
get
posiCve
mammograms.
9.6%
of
women
without
breast
cancer
will
also
get
posiCve
mammograms.
A
woman
in
this
age
group
had
a
posiCve
mammography
in
a
rouCne
screening.
What
is
the
probability
that
she
actually
has
breast
cancer?
P(has
cancer)
=
0.01
P(test
posiCve
|
has
cancer)
=
0.80
P(test
posiCve)
=
0.103
P(has
cancer|
test
posiCve)
=
?
33. P(test
posiCve
|
has
cancer)
P(has
cancer|
test
posiCve)
P(test
posiCve)
P(has
cancer)
1%
of
women
at
age
forty
who
parCcipate
in
rouCne
screening
have
breast
cancer.
80%
of
women
with
breast
cancer
will
get
posiCve
mammograms.
9.6%
of
women
without
breast
cancer
will
also
get
posiCve
mammograms.
A
woman
in
this
age
group
had
a
posiCve
mammography
in
a
rouCne
screening.
What
is
the
probability
that
she
actually
has
breast
cancer?
P(has
cancer)
=
0.01
P(test
posiCve
|
has
cancer)
=
0.80
P(test
posiCve)
=
0.103
P(has
cancer|
test
posiCve)
=
=
0.078
0.80
*
0.01
0.103
34. 1%
of
women
at
age
forty
who
parCcipate
in
rouCne
screening
have
breast
cancer.
80%
of
women
with
breast
cancer
will
get
posiCve
mammograms.
9.6%
of
women
without
breast
cancer
will
also
get
posiCve
mammograms.
A
woman
in
this
age
group
had
a
posiCve
mammography
in
a
rouCne
screening.
What
is
the
probability
that
she
actually
has
breast
cancer?
P(has
cancer)
=
0.01
P(test
posiCve
|
has
cancer)
=
0.80
P(test
posiCve)
=
0.103
P(has
cancer|
test
posiCve)
=
=
0.078
0.80
*
0.01
0.103
ONLY
7.8%
35. 1%
of
women
at
age
forty
who
parCcipate
in
rouCne
screening
have
breast
cancer.
80%
of
women
with
breast
cancer
will
get
posiCve
mammograms.
9.6%
of
women
without
breast
cancer
will
also
get
posiCve
mammograms.
A
woman
in
this
age
group
had
a
posiCve
mammography
in
a
rouCne
screening.
What
is
the
probability
that
she
actually
has
breast
cancer?
P(has
cancer)
=
0.01
P(test
posiCve
|
has
cancer)
=
0.80
P(test
posiCve)
=
0.103
P(has
cancer|
test
posiCve)
=
=
0.078
0.80
*
0.01
0.103
ONLY
7.8%
Most
doctors
guessed
~80%
36. 1%
of
women
at
age
forty
who
parCcipate
in
rouCne
screening
have
breast
cancer.
80%
of
women
with
breast
cancer
will
get
posiCve
mammograms.
9.6%
of
women
without
breast
cancer
will
also
get
posiCve
mammograms.
A
woman
in
this
age
group
had
a
posiCve
mammography
in
a
rouCne
screening.
What
is
the
probability
that
she
actually
has
breast
cancer?
37. 1%
of
women
at
age
forty
who
parCcipate
in
rouCne
screening
have
breast
cancer.
80%
of
women
with
breast
cancer
will
get
posiCve
mammograms.
9.6%
of
women
without
breast
cancer
will
also
get
posiCve
mammograms.
A
woman
in
this
age
group
had
a
posiCve
mammography
in
a
rouCne
screening.
What
is
the
probability
that
she
actually
has
breast
cancer?
38. 1%
of
women
at
age
forty
who
parCcipate
in
rouCne
screening
have
breast
cancer.
80%
of
women
with
breast
cancer
will
get
posiCve
mammograms.
9.6%
of
women
without
breast
cancer
will
also
get
posiCve
mammograms.
A
woman
in
this
age
group
had
a
posiCve
mammography
in
a
rouCne
screening.
What
is
the
probability
that
she
actually
has
breast
cancer?
39. 1%
of
women
at
age
forty
who
parCcipate
in
rouCne
screening
have
breast
cancer.
80%
of
women
with
breast
cancer
will
get
posiCve
mammograms.
9.6%
of
women
without
breast
cancer
will
also
get
posiCve
mammograms.
A
woman
in
this
age
group
had
a
posiCve
mammography
in
a
rouCne
screening.
What
is
the
probability
that
she
actually
has
breast
cancer?
|A|/|U|=
1%
|AB|/|A|
=
80%
(|B|-‐|AB|)/|U|
=
9.6%
|AB|/|B|
=
7.8%
40. P(A | B) =
P(B | A)P(A)
P(B)
P(test
posiCve
|
has
cancer)
P(has
cancer|
test
posiCve)
P(test
posiCve)
P(has
cancer)
41. P(A | B) =
P(B | A)P(A)
P(B)
P(test
posiCve
|
has
cancer)
P(has
cancer|
test
posiCve)
P(test
posiCve)
P(has
cancer)
posterior
likelihood
prior
evidence
42. P(
oscar
nominaCon
|
Meryl
Streep
in
the
movie)
=
?
P(A | B) =
P(B | A)P(A)
P(B)
43. P(
oscar
nominaCon
|
Meryl
Streep
in
the
movie)
=
?
P(
oscar
nominaCon
)
=
#
nominated
/
#
released
P(A | B) =
P(B | A)P(A)
P(B)
44.
45.
46. P(
oscar
nominaCon
|
Meryl
Streep
in
the
movie)
=
?
P(
oscar
nominaCon
)
≈
10
/
#
released
P(A | B) =
P(B | A)P(A)
P(B)
47.
48.
49. P(
oscar
nominaCon
|
Meryl
Streep
in
the
movie)
=
?
P(
oscar
nominaCon
)
=
10
/
600
P(A | B) =
P(B | A)P(A)
P(B)
50. P(
oscar
nominaCon
|
Meryl
Streep
in
the
movie)
=
?
P(
oscar
nominaCon
)
≈
10
/
600
=
1.67%
P(A | B) =
P(B | A)P(A)
P(B)
51. P(
oscar
nominaCon
|
Meryl
Streep
in
the
movie)
=
?
P(
oscar
nominaCon
)
≈
10
/
600
=
1.67%
P(Meryl
Streep
in
the
movie)
=
#
MS
movies
/
#
all
P(A | B) =
P(B | A)P(A)
P(B)
52. P(
oscar
nominaCon
|
Meryl
Streep
in
the
movie)
=
?
P(
oscar
nominaCon
)
≈
10
/
600
=
1.67%
P(Meryl
Streep
in
the
movie)
=
#
MS
movies
/
600
P(A | B) =
P(B | A)P(A)
P(B)
53.
54.
55. #
MS
movies
74
movies
In
40
years
1.85
Meryl
Movies
per
year
on
average
56. P(
oscar
nominaCon
|
Meryl
Streep
in
the
movie)
=
?
P(
oscar
nominaCon
)
≈
10
/
600
=
1.67%
P(Meryl
Streep
in
the
movie)
≈
1.85
/
600
=
0.3%
P(A | B) =
P(B | A)P(A)
P(B)
57. P(
oscar
nominaCon
|
Meryl
Streep
in
the
movie)
=
?
P(
oscar
nominaCon
)
≈
10
/
600
=
1.67%
P(Meryl
Streep
in
the
movie)
≈
1.85
/
600
=
0.3%
P(Meryl
Streep
in
the
movie|oscar
nominaCon)
=
#
nominated
MS
movies
/
all
nominated
movies
P(A | B) =
P(B | A)P(A)
P(B)
58. P(
oscar
nominaCon
|
Meryl
Streep
in
the
movie)
=
?
P(
oscar
nominaCon
)
≈
10
/
600
=
1.67%
P(Meryl
Streep
in
the
movie)
≈
1.85
/
600
=
0.3%
P(Meryl
Streep
in
the
movie|oscar
nominaCon)
=
#
nominated
MS
movies
/
10
P(A | B) =
P(B | A)P(A)
P(B)
60. P(
oscar
nominaCon
|
Meryl
Streep
in
the
movie)
=
?
P(
oscar
nominaCon
)
≈
10
/
600
=
1.67%
P(Meryl
Streep
in
the
movie)
≈
1.85
/
600
=
0.3%
P(Meryl
Streep
in
the
movie|oscar
nominaCon)
=
#
nominated
MS
movies
/
10
P(A | B) =
P(B | A)P(A)
P(B)
61. P(
oscar
nominaCon
|
Meryl
Streep
in
the
movie)
=
?
P(
oscar
nominaCon
)
≈
10
/
600
=
1.67%
P(Meryl
Streep
in
the
movie)
≈
1.85
/
600
=
0.3%
P(Meryl
Streep
in
the
movie|oscar
nominaCon)
=
0.475
/
10
P(A | B) =
P(B | A)P(A)
P(B)
62. P(
oscar
nominaCon
|
Meryl
Streep
in
the
movie)
=
?
P(
oscar
nominaCon
)
≈
10
/
600
=
1.67%
P(Meryl
Streep
in
the
movie)
≈
1.85
/
600
=
0.3%
P(Meryl
Streep
in
the
movie|oscar
nominaCon)=4.8%
0.475
/
10
P(A | B) =
P(B | A)P(A)
P(B)
63. P(
oscar
nominaCon
|
Meryl
Streep
in
the
movie)
=
?
P(
oscar
nominaCon
)
≈
10
/
600
=
1.67%
P(Meryl
Streep
in
the
movie)
≈
1.85
/
600
=
0.3%
P(Meryl
Streep
in
the
movie|oscar
nominaCon)=4.8%
0.475
/
10
P(nom|MS)
=
P(MS|nom)P(nom)
/
P(MS)
P(A | B) =
P(B | A)P(A)
P(B)
64. P(
oscar
nominaCon
|
Meryl
Streep
in
the
movie)
=
?
P(
oscar
nominaCon
)
≈
10
/
600
=
1.67%
P(Meryl
Streep
in
the
movie)
≈
1.85
/
600
=
0.3%
P(Meryl
Streep
in
the
movie|oscar
nominaCon)=4.8%
0.475
/
10
P(nom|MS)
=
P(MS|nom)P(nom)
/
P(MS)
=
4.8%
*
1.67%
/
0.3%
P(A | B) =
P(B | A)P(A)
P(B)
65. P(
oscar
nominaCon
|
Meryl
Streep
in
the
movie)
=
?
P(
oscar
nominaCon
)
≈
10
/
600
=
1.67%
P(Meryl
Streep
in
the
movie)
≈
1.85
/
600
=
0.3%
P(Meryl
Streep
in
the
movie|oscar
nominaCon)=4.8%
0.475
/
10
P(nom|MS)
=
P(MS|nom)P(nom)
/
P(MS)
=
4.8%
*
1.67%
/
0.3%
=
25.7%
P(A | B) =
P(B | A)P(A)
P(B)
66. P(
oscar
nominaCon
|
Meryl
Streep
in
the
movie)
=
?
P(nom|MS)
=
P(MS|nom)P(nom)
/
P(MS)
=
4.8%
*
1.67%
/
0.3%
=
25.7%
P(A | B) =
P(B | A)P(A)
P(B)
67. P(
oscar
nominaCon
|
Meryl
Streep
in
the
movie)
=
?
=
#
nominated
MS
movies
/
#
MS
movies
P(nom|MS)
=
P(MS|nom)P(nom)
/
P(MS)
=
4.8%
*
1.67%
/
0.3%
=
25.7%
P(A | B) =
P(B | A)P(A)
P(B)
68. P(
oscar
nominaCon
|
Meryl
Streep
in
the
movie)
=
?
=
#
nominated
MS
movies
/
#
MS
movies
=
(
0.475
nom
per
year)
/
(1.85
MS
movies
per
year)
P(nom|MS)
=
P(MS|nom)P(nom)
/
P(MS)
=
4.8%
*
1.67%
/
0.3%
=
25.7%
P(A | B) =
P(B | A)P(A)
P(B)
69. P(
oscar
nominaCon
|
Meryl
Streep
in
the
movie)
=
?
=
#
nominated
MS
movies
/
#
MS
movies
=
(
0.475
nom
per
year)
/
(1.85
MS
movies
per
year)
=
0.475
/
1.85
=
25.7%
P(nom|MS)
=
P(MS|nom)P(nom)
/
P(MS)
=
4.8%
*
1.67%
/
0.3%
=
25.7%
P(A | B) =
P(B | A)P(A)
P(B)
70. Meryl
movies
that
are
not
nominated
Non-‐Meryl
movies
that
don’t
get
nominated
Nominated
Meryl
movies
0.475
per
year
Nominated
movies
10
per
year
Meryl
movies
1.85
per
year
Nominated
non-‐Meryl
movies
76. Date Jan. 23, 2015.
Time Unknown.
I arrived from 2055,
in Union Square subway station,
naked.
77. Date Jan. 23, 2015.
Time Unknown.
I arrived from 2055,
in Union Square subway station,
naked.
78. Date Jan. 23, 2015.
Time Unknown.
I arrived from 2055,
in Union Square subway station,
naked.
Between 9 AM and 10 AM today, a scientist will
perform an experiment, starting a chain of
events resulting in a black hole in NYC.
79.
80. Date Jan. 23, 2015.
Time Unknown.
I arrived from 2055,
in Union Square subway station,
naked.
Between 9 AM and 10 AM today, a scientist will
perform an experiment, starting a chain of
events resulting in a black hole in NYC.
I’ve been sent back to stop her.
83. What time is it? Is it 9 AM?
Time travel technology is only precise enough to
target a 24 hour window.
84. What time is it? Is it 9 AM?
Time travel technology is only precise enough to
target a 24 hour window.
What is my current certainty that it is 9 AM?
85. What time is it? Is it 9 AM?
Time travel technology is only precise enough to
target a 24 hour window.
What is my current certainty that it is 9 AM?
Any hour in that 24-hour window is equally likely.
86. What time is it? Is it 9 AM?
Time travel technology is only precise enough to
target a 24 hour window.
What is my current certainty that it is 9 AM?
Any hour in that 24-hour window is equally likely.
P(9AM) = 1/24 = 0.0416
87. What time is it? Is it 9 AM?
Time travel technology is only precise enough to
target a 24 hour window.
What is my current certainty that it is 9 AM?
Any hour in that 24-hour window is equally likely.
P(9AM) = 1/24 = 0.0416
4.16%
Right
Time
88. What time is it? Is it 9 AM?
Time travel technology is only precise enough to
target a 24 hour window.
What is my current certainty that it is 9 AM?
Any hour in that 24-hour window is equally likely.
P(9AM) = 1/24 = 0.0416
I need to gather more information.
4.16%
Right
Time
90. What time is it? Is it 9 AM?
Time travel technology is only precise enough to
target a 24 hour window.
What is my current certainty that it is 9 AM?
Any hour in that 24-hour window is equally likely.
P(9AM) = 1/24 = 0.0416
I need to gather more information.
5-Train is approaching. I can see that it is full.
Checking my databanks…..
4.16%
Right
Time
93. Checking my databanks…..Records found:
Between 9 and 10 AM, 5-train is full 70% of the time
Other times, it is full 20% of the time on average
4.16%
Right
Time
94. Checking my databanks…..Records found:
Between 9 and 10 AM, 5-train is full 70% of the time
Other times, it is full 20% of the time on average
P(5-train full|9AM) = 0.7
4.16%
Right
Time
95. Checking my databanks…..Records found:
Between 9 and 10 AM, 5-train is full 70% of the time
Other times, it is full 20% of the time on average
P(5-train full|9AM) = 0.7
My current certainty, prior to the new information, is
P(9AM) = 0.0416
4.16%
Right
Time
96. Checking my databanks…..Records found:
Between 9 and 10 AM, 5-train is full 70% of the time
Other times, it is full 20% of the time on average
P(5-train full|9AM) = 0.7
My current certainty, prior to the new information, is
P(9AM) = 0.0416
P(5-train full) = P(5-train full|9AM) P(9AM)
+ P(5-train full|not 9AM) P(not 9AM)
4.16%
Right
Time
97. Checking my databanks…..Records found:
Between 9 and 10 AM, 5-train is full 70% of the time
Other times, it is full 20% of the time on average
P(5-train full|9AM) = 0.7
My current certainty, prior to the new information, is
P(9AM) = 0.0416
P(5-train full) = P(5-train full|9AM) P(9AM)
+ P(5-train full|not 9AM) P(not 9AM)
= 0.7 * 0.0416 + 0.2 * (1 – 0.0416)
= 0.2208
4.16%
Right
Time
105. My current certainty is 13.19%.
I need to gather more information.
Train doors open. I can hear someone’s radio.
It’s NPR News, live.
13.19%
Right
Time
106. My current certainty is 13.19%.
I need to gather more information.
Train doors open. I can hear someone’s radio.
It’s NPR News, live.
Checking database……
13.19%
Right
Time
107. My current certainty is 13.19%.
I need to gather more information.
Train doors open. I can hear someone’s radio.
It’s NPR News.
Checking database……Records found:
NPR News is broadcast 3 times during the day:
9AM-10AM, 1PM-2PM, 7PM-8PM.
13.19%
Right
Time
108. My current certainty is 13.19%.
I need to gather more information.
Train doors open. I can hear someone’s radio.
It’s NPR News.
Checking database……Records found:
NPR News is broadcast 3 times during the day:
9AM-10AM, 1PM-2PM, 7PM-8PM.
P(News |9AM) = 1.0
P(News|not 9AM) = 2 / 23 = 0.087
13.19%
Right
Time
109. My current certainty is 13.19%.
I need to gather more information.
Train doors open. I can hear someone’s radio.
It’s NPR News.
Checking database……Records found:
NPR News is broadcast 3 times during the day:
9AM-10AM, 1PM-2PM, 7PM-8PM.
P(News |9AM) = 1.0
P(News|not 9AM) = 2 / 23 = 0.087
P(9AM|5tf)= 0.1319
13.19%
Right
Time
110. My current certainty is 13.19%.
I need to gather more information.
Train doors open. I can hear someone’s radio.
It’s NPR News.
Checking database……Records found:
NPR News is broadcast 3 times during the day:
9AM-10AM, 1PM-2PM, 7PM-8PM.
P(News |9AM) = 1.0
P(News|not 9AM) = 2 / 23 = 0.087
P(9AM|5tf)= 0.1319
P(News|5tf) = P(News|9AM)P(9AM|5tf)
+ P(News|not 9AM)P(not 9AM|5tf)
13.19%
Right
Time
111. My current certainty is 13.19%.
I need to gather more information.
Train doors open. I can hear someone’s radio.
It’s NPR News.
Checking database……Records found:
NPR News is broadcast 3 times during the day:
9AM-10AM, 1PM-2PM, 7PM-8PM.
P(News |9AM) = 1.0
P(News|not 9AM) = 2 / 23 = 0.087
P(9AM|5tf)= 0.1319
P(News|5tf) = P(News|9AM)P(9AM|5tf)
+ P(News|not 9AM)P(not 9AM|5tf)
= 1.0* 0.1319 + 0.087 * (1 - 0.1319)
= 0.2074
13.19%
Right
Time
119. My current certainty is 63.59%.
I need to gather more information.
I’ll ask this person. “What time is it?”
He says “It’s nine.”
63.59%
Right
Time
120. My current certainty is 63.59%.
I need to gather more information.
I’ll ask this person. “What time is it?”
He says “It’s nine.”
Loading human interactions model……..
63.59%
Right
Time
121. My current certainty is 63.59%.
I need to gather more information.
I’ll ask this person. “What time is it?”
He says “It’s nine.”
Loading human interactions model……..
P(“Nine” | 9AM) = 0.96 (watch may be broken, etc.)
63.59%
Right
Time
122. My current certainty is 63.59%.
I need to gather more information.
I’ll ask this person. “What time is it?”
He says “It’s nine.”
Loading human interactions model……..
P(“Nine” | 9AM) = 0.96 (watch may be broken, etc.)
P(“Nine” |not 9AM) = 1/24 = 0.042 (9 PM -> “Nine”)
63.59%
Right
Time
123. My current certainty is 63.59%.
I need to gather more information.
I’ll ask this person. “What time is it?”
He says “It’s nine.”
Loading human interactions model……..
P(“Nine” | 9AM) = 0.96 (watch may be broken, etc.)
P(“Nine” |not 9AM) = 1/24 = 0.042 (9 PM -> “Nine”)
P(9AM|N,5tf)= 0.6359
63.59%
Right
Time
124. My current certainty is 63.59%.
I need to gather more information.
I’ll ask this person. “What time is it?”
He says “It’s nine.”
Loading human interactions model……..
P(“Nine” | 9AM) = 0.96 (watch may be broken, etc.)
P(“Nine” |not 9AM) = 1/24 = 0.042 (9 PM -> “Nine”)
P(9AM|N,5tf)= 0.6359
P(“Nine”|N,5tf) = P(“Nine”|9AM)P(9AM|N,5tf)
+ P(“Nine”|not 9AM)P(not 9AM|N,5tf)
63.59%
Right
Time
125. My current certainty is 63.59%.
I need to gather more information.
I’ll ask this person. “What time is it?”
He says “It’s nine.”
Loading human interactions model……..
P(“Nine” | 9AM) = 0.96 (watch may be broken, etc.)
P(“Nine” |not 9AM) = 1/24 = 0.042 (9 PM -> “Nine”)
P(9AM|N,5tf)= 0.6359
P(“Nine”|N,5tf) = P(“Nine”|9AM)P(9AM|N,5tf)
+ P(“Nine”|not 9AM)P(not 9AM|N,5tf)
= 0.96 * 0.6359 + 0.042 * (1 – 0.6359)
= 0.6258
63.59%
Right
Time
139. Our
Cme
traveler
had
two
hypotheses
H1
:
It
is
9
AM
(9
to
10)
H2
:
It
is
not
9
AM
140. Our
Cme
traveler
had
two
hypotheses
H1
:
It
is
9
AM
(9
to
10)
H2
:
It
is
not
9
AM
At
first,
P(H1)
=
P(9AM)
=
4.16%
P(H2)
=
P(not
9AM)
=
95.84%
141. Our
Cme
traveler
had
two
hypotheses
H1
:
It
is
9
AM
(9
to
10)
H2
:
It
is
not
9
AM
At
first,
P(H1)
=
P(9AM)
=
4.16%
P(H2)
=
P(not
9AM)
=
95.84%
Updates
with
new
informaCon
142. Our
Cme
traveler
had
two
hypotheses
H1
:
It
is
9
AM
(9
to
10)
H2
:
It
is
not
9
AM
At
first,
P(H1)
=
P(9AM)
=
4.16%
P(H2)
=
P(not
9AM)
=
95.84%
Updates
with
new
informaCon
In
the
end,
P(H1)
=
P(
9AM
|“Nine”,N,5tf)
=
97.56%
P(H2)
=
P(not
9AM|“Nine”,N,5tf)
=
2.44%
144. Cookie
problem
also
has
two
hypotheses
H1
:
It
is
Bowl
1
H2
:
It
is
Bowl
2
At
first,
P(H1)
=
P(Bowl
1)
=
50%
P(H2)
=
P(Bowl
2)
=
50%
145. Cookie
problem
also
has
two
hypotheses
H1
:
It
is
Bowl
1
H2
:
It
is
Bowl
2
At
first,
P(H1)
=
P(Bowl
1)
=
50%
P(H2)
=
P(Bowl
2)
=
50%
Update
with
one
cookie
informaCon:
Vanilla
P(Bowl
1
|
Vanilla)
=
?
146. Cookie
problem
also
has
two
hypotheses
H1
:
It
is
Bowl
1
H2
:
It
is
Bowl
2
At
first,
P(H1)
=
P(Bowl
1)
=
50%
P(H2)
=
P(Bowl
2)
=
50%
Update
with
one
cookie
informaCon:
Vanilla
P(Bowl
1
|
Vanilla)
=
?
P(Bowl
2
|
Vanilla)
=
1
-‐
P(Bowl
1
|
Vanilla)
=
?
175. P(Bowl
1)
=
0.696
P(Chocolate
|
Bowl
1)
=
0.2632
P(Chocolate
)
=
0.343
P(Bowl 1|Chocolate
) = 0.5338
P(Bowl 2|Chocolate
) = 0.4662
After eating Vanilla, Vanilla, Chocolate,
I am 53.38% certain that this is Bowl 1.
(So basically I have no idea, I’ll have to eat all cookies)
53.38%
Bowl 1
177. A
railroad
numbers
its
locomoCves
in
order
1…...N.
One
day
you
see
a
locomoCve
with
the
number
60.
EsCmate
how
many
locomoCves
the
railroad
has.
60
178. H1
:
There
is
1
train
H2
:
There
are
2
trains
H3
:
There
are
3
trains
H4
:
There
are
4
trains
.
.
.
H1000
:
There
are
1000
trains
60
179. H1
:
There
is
1
train
0.1%
H2
:
There
are
2
trains
0.1%
H3
:
There
are
3
trains
0.1%
…
H200
:
There
are
200
trains
0.1%
…
H1000
:
There
are
1000
trains
0.1%
60
180. H1
:
There
is
1
train
0.1%
H2
:
There
are
2
trains
0.1%
H3
:
There
are
3
trains
0.1%
…
H200
:
There
are
200
trains
0.1%
…
H1000
:
There
are
1000
trains
0.1%
60
Update
181. H1
:
There
is
1
train
0.1%
0%
H2
:
There
are
2
trains
0.1%
0%
H3
:
There
are
3
trains
0.1%
0%
…
H200
:
There
are
200
trains
0.1%
0.4%
…
H1000
:
There
are
1000
trains
0.1%
0.3%
60
Update
182. Our
Cme
traveler
had
two
hypotheses
H1
:
It
is
9
AM
(9
to
10)
H2
:
It
is
not
9
AM
H1
H2
At
first,
prior
dist.
P(H1)
=
P(9AM)
=
4.16%
P(H2)
=
P(not
9AM)
=
95.84%
183. Our
Cme
traveler
had
two
hypotheses
H1
:
It
is
9
AM
(9
to
10)
H2
:
It
is
not
9
AM
H1
H2
posterior
dist.
184. Our
Cme
traveler
had
two
hypotheses
H1
:
It
is
9
AM
(9
to
10)
H2
:
It
is
not
9
AM
H1
H2
posterior
dist.
185. Our
Cme
traveler
had
two
hypotheses
H1
:
It
is
9
AM
(9
to
10)
H2
:
It
is
not
9
AM
H1
H2
posterior
dist.
Our
Cme
traveler
had
two
hypotheses
H1
:
It
is
9
AM
(9
to
10)
H2
:
It
is
not
9
AM
H1
H2
In
the
end,
P(H1)
=
P(
9AM
|“Nine”,N,5tf)
=
97.56%
P(H2)
=
P(not
9AM|“Nine”,N,5tf)
=
2.44%
186. H1
:
There
is
1
train
0.1%
0%
H2
:
There
are
2
trains
0.1%
0%
H3
:
There
are
3
trains
0.1%
0%
…
H200
:
There
are
200
trains
0.1%
0.4%
…
H1000
:
There
are
1000
trains
0.1%
0.3%
60
Update
187. H1
:
There
is
1
train
0.1%
H2
:
There
are
2
trains
0.1%
H3
:
There
are
3
trains
0.1%
…
H200
:
There
are
200
trains
0.1%
…
H1000
:
There
are
1000
trains
0.1%
… … … …
H1
H2
H3
H4
H5
…
H60
…
H200
...
H1000
…
188. H1
:
There
is
1
train
0.1%
0%
H2
:
There
are
2
trains
0.1%
0%
H3
:
There
are
3
trains
0.1%
0%
…
H200
:
There
are
200
trains
0.1%
0.4%
…
H1000
:
There
are
1000
trains
0.1%
0.3%
… … … …
H1
H2
H3
H4
H5
…
H60
…
H200
...
H1000
…
Update