SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 1
The tidal freshwater zone (TFZ)
• Tidally-influenced region of river upstream of estuary
• Increased water residence time may enhance N
cycling in sediments and water column3
Organic matter and grain size comparisons
in sediments of tidally-influenced freshwater rivers
Sierra Melton1, 2, Tricia Light1,3, Amber Hardison1, Jim McClelland1, Xin Xu1, Hengchen Wei1
1University of Texas Marine Science Institute, 2Colorado College, 3Scripps College
Introduction
Sediment characteristics affect bacterial activity and
organic matter (OM) content of sediments, influencing
nitrogen (N) cycling:
Methods
Sampling:
• Collected 2 cores from each site
• Sectioned sediment column
Field Site
Mission and Aransas watersheds, in South Texas
• Different anthropogenic influences
Sampling Sites
• 5 sites in each river’s TFZ
Grain size distribution analysis:
• Washed each slice through set of sieves
• Oven-dried, measured mass of each grain size fraction
Porosity analysis:
• Water mass = Wet mass – Dry mass
• % water is proxy for porosity in submerged sediment
>300 µm
<63 µm63-125 µm
125-300 µm
Results
Conclusions
Mission:
• Finer sediments likely support greater N cycling rates
Aransas:
• More sandy, less variable with depth
• N cycling rates likely slower
• Greater risk of N loading from anthropogenic sources
1. CSIRO Huon Estuary Study Team, 2000, Huon Estuary Study —
environmental research for integrated catchment management and
aquaculture. Final report to Fisheries Research and Development
Corporation. Project number 96/284, June 2000. CSIRO Division of
Marine Research. Marine Laboratories, Hobart.
2. Howarth, R.W. and Marino, R., 2006, Nitrogen as the limiting nutrient
for eutrophication in coastal marine ecosystems: Evolving views over
three decades: Limnology and Oceanography, v. 51(1), p. 364-376.
3. Bianchi, T.S., 2007, Biogeochemistry of Estuaries. Oxford University
Press.
Literature Cited
Mission Grain Size Aransas Grain Size
Mission Organic Matter (top 3cm of core) Aransas Organic Matter (top 3cm of core)
Organic matter analysis:
• Ground up, homogenized each dry sample
• Weighed small amounts, acidified to remove inorganic C
• Measured C and N content using an elemental analyzer
OM follows grain size trends OM follows grain size trends
y = 0.6223x + 23.299
R² = 0.8327
y = 0.5295x + 20.211
R² = 0.9192
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
0 20 40 60 80 100
%Water
% Fine Fraction (Silt and clay)
y = 0.0016x + 0.0454
R² = 0.3344
y = 0.0015x + 0.0067
R² = 0.9377
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0 20 40 60 80 100
%C
% Fine Fraction (Silt and Clay)
Porosity vs Grain Size Organic Matter vs Grain Size
Results Summary
• Suggests downstream
depocenter
• Enhanced by recent increased
river discharge?
• No consistent downstream
trends when data averaged
over full 10 cm
Differences in
sediments
Differences in
decomposition
Differences in
N cycling?
Acknowledgements
Many thanks to the UTMSI REUisME
program, especially program directors Dr.
Ben Walther, Dr. Deana Erdner, and Matt
Seeley. Thanks to Nick Reyna for
laboratory support. Financial support for
this research was provided by the
National Science Foundation, NSF project
number EAR-1417433 to AH and JM.
Contact Information:
Sierra Melton
sierra.melton@coloradocollege.edu
Climate change
Water consumption
Sea level
River discharge
Inland migration/
elimination of TFZ?
Fine grains
bacterial,
OM content1 N cycling?
N is often limiting nutrient in marine ecosystems
N loading in rivers
Eutrophication in near-
shore environments2
Research Question:
How do sediment grain size, porosity, and OM content
change along the TFZ of the Mission and Aransas rivers?
Downstream Trends (top 3 cm)
Why care about the tidal freshwater zone?
River Comparisons
Possible Implications for N Cycling
Mission Aransas
Grain
size
Clay, silt
Finer
Fine sand
Coarser
%water 41.67%
More
porous
32.36%
Less
porous
% TOC
% TN
0.995%
0.0871%
More OM
0.350%
0.0423%
Less OM
C:N 13.38
Higher
8.19
Lower
-30 -25 -20 -15 -10
Distance from River Mouth (km)
-30 -25 -20 -15 -10
Distance from River Mouth (km)
More fine grains
Greater porosity
Greater OM content
In both rivers…

More Related Content

What's hot

155TermProject
155TermProject155TermProject
155TermProject
Kevin Qi
 
Green Roof Capstone Seminar_KW_April 2015
Green Roof Capstone Seminar_KW_April 2015Green Roof Capstone Seminar_KW_April 2015
Green Roof Capstone Seminar_KW_April 2015
Krystal White
 
Session 6.5 modelling the effects of adopting agroforestry on basin scale run...
Session 6.5 modelling the effects of adopting agroforestry on basin scale run...Session 6.5 modelling the effects of adopting agroforestry on basin scale run...
Session 6.5 modelling the effects of adopting agroforestry on basin scale run...
World Agroforestry (ICRAF)
 

What's hot (14)

radio isotope in ground water study
radio isotope in ground water studyradio isotope in ground water study
radio isotope in ground water study
 
155TermProject
155TermProject155TermProject
155TermProject
 
Isotope Hydrology
Isotope HydrologyIsotope Hydrology
Isotope Hydrology
 
Isotope hydrology
Isotope hydrologyIsotope hydrology
Isotope hydrology
 
CL_LOIPOSTERFINAL
CL_LOIPOSTERFINALCL_LOIPOSTERFINAL
CL_LOIPOSTERFINAL
 
Green Roof Capstone Seminar_KW_April 2015
Green Roof Capstone Seminar_KW_April 2015Green Roof Capstone Seminar_KW_April 2015
Green Roof Capstone Seminar_KW_April 2015
 
Ground water sampling & Analysis technique
Ground water sampling & Analysis techniqueGround water sampling & Analysis technique
Ground water sampling & Analysis technique
 
Soil moisture by tensiometer
Soil moisture by  tensiometerSoil moisture by  tensiometer
Soil moisture by tensiometer
 
Session 6.5 modelling the effects of adopting agroforestry on basin scale run...
Session 6.5 modelling the effects of adopting agroforestry on basin scale run...Session 6.5 modelling the effects of adopting agroforestry on basin scale run...
Session 6.5 modelling the effects of adopting agroforestry on basin scale run...
 
Hydrology of Carsington Water
Hydrology of Carsington WaterHydrology of Carsington Water
Hydrology of Carsington Water
 
NanoFASE exposure assessment: Low tier
NanoFASE exposure assessment: Low tierNanoFASE exposure assessment: Low tier
NanoFASE exposure assessment: Low tier
 
NanoFASE exposure assessment: Middle tier
NanoFASE exposure assessment: Middle tier NanoFASE exposure assessment: Middle tier
NanoFASE exposure assessment: Middle tier
 
2 solis water-air relationships
2 solis water-air relationships2 solis water-air relationships
2 solis water-air relationships
 
NanoFASE exposure assessment: Higher tier
NanoFASE exposure assessment: Higher tierNanoFASE exposure assessment: Higher tier
NanoFASE exposure assessment: Higher tier
 

Similar to ASLO 2016 SierraPoster_FINAL

Quality and purification of domestic water supply
Quality and purification of domestic water supplyQuality and purification of domestic water supply
Quality and purification of domestic water supply
Brijesh Kumar
 
Current Groundwater Investigations at Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi, Ri...
Current Groundwater Investigations at Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi, Ri...Current Groundwater Investigations at Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi, Ri...
Current Groundwater Investigations at Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi, Ri...
Texas Alliance of Groundwater Districts
 
Oral Presentation for defense final
Oral Presentation for defense finalOral Presentation for defense final
Oral Presentation for defense final
Mason King
 

Similar to ASLO 2016 SierraPoster_FINAL (20)

John Harris - 2016 Independent Study Presentation Poster
John Harris - 2016 Independent Study Presentation PosterJohn Harris - 2016 Independent Study Presentation Poster
John Harris - 2016 Independent Study Presentation Poster
 
Quality and purification of domestic water supply
Quality and purification of domestic water supplyQuality and purification of domestic water supply
Quality and purification of domestic water supply
 
Stober, Trent, HDR Inc., 2015 Missouri Lake Nutrient Criteria, at Missouri Wa...
Stober, Trent, HDR Inc., 2015 Missouri Lake Nutrient Criteria, at Missouri Wa...Stober, Trent, HDR Inc., 2015 Missouri Lake Nutrient Criteria, at Missouri Wa...
Stober, Trent, HDR Inc., 2015 Missouri Lake Nutrient Criteria, at Missouri Wa...
 
Poster
PosterPoster
Poster
 
Current Groundwater Investigations at Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi, Ri...
Current Groundwater Investigations at Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi, Ri...Current Groundwater Investigations at Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi, Ri...
Current Groundwater Investigations at Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi, Ri...
 
Organo-chlorine Pesticides Pollutant in the Sediment Bottom of Nha Trang Bay,...
Organo-chlorine Pesticides Pollutant in the Sediment Bottom of Nha Trang Bay,...Organo-chlorine Pesticides Pollutant in the Sediment Bottom of Nha Trang Bay,...
Organo-chlorine Pesticides Pollutant in the Sediment Bottom of Nha Trang Bay,...
 
Mattias von Brömsse - Targetting safe aquifers
Mattias von Brömsse - Targetting safe aquifersMattias von Brömsse - Targetting safe aquifers
Mattias von Brömsse - Targetting safe aquifers
 
Evaluating wetland impacts on nutrient loads
Evaluating wetland impacts on nutrient loadsEvaluating wetland impacts on nutrient loads
Evaluating wetland impacts on nutrient loads
 
River and Stream modelling and water.pptx
River and Stream modelling and water.pptxRiver and Stream modelling and water.pptx
River and Stream modelling and water.pptx
 
Muhammad usman
Muhammad usmanMuhammad usman
Muhammad usman
 
Irrigating Alfalfa: making the most of your water
Irrigating Alfalfa: making the most of your waterIrrigating Alfalfa: making the most of your water
Irrigating Alfalfa: making the most of your water
 
Shawn Rummel, Trout Unlimited, "Recovery of Coldwater Ecosystems Following Tr...
Shawn Rummel, Trout Unlimited, "Recovery of Coldwater Ecosystems Following Tr...Shawn Rummel, Trout Unlimited, "Recovery of Coldwater Ecosystems Following Tr...
Shawn Rummel, Trout Unlimited, "Recovery of Coldwater Ecosystems Following Tr...
 
Muhammad usman
Muhammad usmanMuhammad usman
Muhammad usman
 
Evaluating the effect of pasture type and grasing intensity
Evaluating the effect of pasture type and grasing intensityEvaluating the effect of pasture type and grasing intensity
Evaluating the effect of pasture type and grasing intensity
 
Effects of limiting water on growth, development and yield of alfalfa grown i...
Effects of limiting water on growth, development and yield of alfalfa grown i...Effects of limiting water on growth, development and yield of alfalfa grown i...
Effects of limiting water on growth, development and yield of alfalfa grown i...
 
Siltflux workshop 1: Sediment Research Teagasc- Daire Ó hUallacháin
Siltflux workshop 1: Sediment Research Teagasc- Daire Ó hUallacháinSiltflux workshop 1: Sediment Research Teagasc- Daire Ó hUallacháin
Siltflux workshop 1: Sediment Research Teagasc- Daire Ó hUallacháin
 
Sediment Research Teagasc - Daire O hUallachain
Sediment Research Teagasc - Daire O hUallachainSediment Research Teagasc - Daire O hUallachain
Sediment Research Teagasc - Daire O hUallachain
 
Oral Presentation for defense final
Oral Presentation for defense finalOral Presentation for defense final
Oral Presentation for defense final
 
Senimar for link
Senimar for linkSenimar for link
Senimar for link
 
Salt groundwater-contaminant
Salt groundwater-contaminantSalt groundwater-contaminant
Salt groundwater-contaminant
 

ASLO 2016 SierraPoster_FINAL

  • 1. The tidal freshwater zone (TFZ) • Tidally-influenced region of river upstream of estuary • Increased water residence time may enhance N cycling in sediments and water column3 Organic matter and grain size comparisons in sediments of tidally-influenced freshwater rivers Sierra Melton1, 2, Tricia Light1,3, Amber Hardison1, Jim McClelland1, Xin Xu1, Hengchen Wei1 1University of Texas Marine Science Institute, 2Colorado College, 3Scripps College Introduction Sediment characteristics affect bacterial activity and organic matter (OM) content of sediments, influencing nitrogen (N) cycling: Methods Sampling: • Collected 2 cores from each site • Sectioned sediment column Field Site Mission and Aransas watersheds, in South Texas • Different anthropogenic influences Sampling Sites • 5 sites in each river’s TFZ Grain size distribution analysis: • Washed each slice through set of sieves • Oven-dried, measured mass of each grain size fraction Porosity analysis: • Water mass = Wet mass – Dry mass • % water is proxy for porosity in submerged sediment >300 µm <63 µm63-125 µm 125-300 µm Results Conclusions Mission: • Finer sediments likely support greater N cycling rates Aransas: • More sandy, less variable with depth • N cycling rates likely slower • Greater risk of N loading from anthropogenic sources 1. CSIRO Huon Estuary Study Team, 2000, Huon Estuary Study — environmental research for integrated catchment management and aquaculture. Final report to Fisheries Research and Development Corporation. Project number 96/284, June 2000. CSIRO Division of Marine Research. Marine Laboratories, Hobart. 2. Howarth, R.W. and Marino, R., 2006, Nitrogen as the limiting nutrient for eutrophication in coastal marine ecosystems: Evolving views over three decades: Limnology and Oceanography, v. 51(1), p. 364-376. 3. Bianchi, T.S., 2007, Biogeochemistry of Estuaries. Oxford University Press. Literature Cited Mission Grain Size Aransas Grain Size Mission Organic Matter (top 3cm of core) Aransas Organic Matter (top 3cm of core) Organic matter analysis: • Ground up, homogenized each dry sample • Weighed small amounts, acidified to remove inorganic C • Measured C and N content using an elemental analyzer OM follows grain size trends OM follows grain size trends y = 0.6223x + 23.299 R² = 0.8327 y = 0.5295x + 20.211 R² = 0.9192 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 0 20 40 60 80 100 %Water % Fine Fraction (Silt and clay) y = 0.0016x + 0.0454 R² = 0.3344 y = 0.0015x + 0.0067 R² = 0.9377 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0 20 40 60 80 100 %C % Fine Fraction (Silt and Clay) Porosity vs Grain Size Organic Matter vs Grain Size Results Summary • Suggests downstream depocenter • Enhanced by recent increased river discharge? • No consistent downstream trends when data averaged over full 10 cm Differences in sediments Differences in decomposition Differences in N cycling? Acknowledgements Many thanks to the UTMSI REUisME program, especially program directors Dr. Ben Walther, Dr. Deana Erdner, and Matt Seeley. Thanks to Nick Reyna for laboratory support. Financial support for this research was provided by the National Science Foundation, NSF project number EAR-1417433 to AH and JM. Contact Information: Sierra Melton sierra.melton@coloradocollege.edu Climate change Water consumption Sea level River discharge Inland migration/ elimination of TFZ? Fine grains bacterial, OM content1 N cycling? N is often limiting nutrient in marine ecosystems N loading in rivers Eutrophication in near- shore environments2 Research Question: How do sediment grain size, porosity, and OM content change along the TFZ of the Mission and Aransas rivers? Downstream Trends (top 3 cm) Why care about the tidal freshwater zone? River Comparisons Possible Implications for N Cycling Mission Aransas Grain size Clay, silt Finer Fine sand Coarser %water 41.67% More porous 32.36% Less porous % TOC % TN 0.995% 0.0871% More OM 0.350% 0.0423% Less OM C:N 13.38 Higher 8.19 Lower -30 -25 -20 -15 -10 Distance from River Mouth (km) -30 -25 -20 -15 -10 Distance from River Mouth (km) More fine grains Greater porosity Greater OM content In both rivers…