1) The document discusses aromatic upgrading of by-products from sardine processing through enzymatic hydrolysis.
2) An experimental design was used to study the effects of temperature, time, antioxidants, and sugar on aromatic compound production from sardine hydrolysates.
3) Analysis found that 11 aromatic compounds were significantly influenced by processing parameters, with compounds related to Maillard reactions and lipid oxidation being produced.
Predicting property prices with machine learning algorithms.pdf
Aromatic upgrading of marine by products
1. Aromatic upgrading of marine by-products
Sardine (Sardina pilchardus) hydrolysates example
L. Tripoteau1,2, C. Prost2, M. Cardinal1, JP Bergé1
1 Département Sciences et Technologie Alimentaires Marines,
IFREMER centre de Nantes, BP 21105, 44311 Nantes cedex 03,
France
2 ENITIAA– Equipe de recherche Arôme UMR CNRS 6144 Nantes,
France
Members of the SEApro network
WEFTA 2008, Florence – Italy, 17-19 September 2008 1
8. METHODOLOGY
Aromatic characterization
Extraction of volatile components :
Solid phase micro-extraction (SPME)
- 20 min equilibrium Volatile components adsorbed
on SPME CAR/PDMS fiber
- 30 min adsorption
Head space
20 ml of hydrolysate
Water bath at 30°C
WEFTA 2008, Florence – Italy, 17-19 September 2008 8
9. METHODOLOGY
Aromatic characterization
Identification – Semi-quantification
GC - MS - FID
- Identification by MS and RI
- Internal standard
- Semi-quantification
WEFTA 2008, Florence – Italy, 17-19 September 2008 9
11. METHODOLOGY
Maillard reaction
Polysaccharides degradation Carotenoids degradation
Aroma from
hydrolysates
PUFA oxydation MUFA oxydation
(ω3 et ω6) (ω9)
WEFTA 2008, Florence – Italy, 17-19 September 2008 11
12. METHODOLOGY
Maillard reaction
Polysaccharides degradation Carotenoids degradation
Aroma from
hydrolysates
PUFA oxydation MUFA oxydation
(ω3 et ω6) (ω9)
WEFTA 2008, Florence – Italy, 17-19 September 2008 12
13. METHODOLOGY
Raw material (100) Enzyme (x)
(sardina heads & viscera) (large spectra protease)
Water (50)
Antioxydants (-1 / +1) Sugar (-1 / +1)
(complementary actions)
Temperature Time
(-1 / +1) Reaction (-1 / +1)
Reaction
Reaction
WEFTA 2008, Florence – Italy, 17-19 September 2008 13
14. METHODOLOGY
Experimental design
Parameters Low Center High
Temperature (°C) 30 45 60
Time (min) 30 195 360
Antioxydant -1 0 1
Sugar -1 0 1
WEFTA 2008, Florence – Italy, 17-19 September 2008 14
15. RESULTS
Major origin
Origine principale
Compound
Composé
R Lipid
éactions Oxydation
Maillard
de Maillard Oxydation
lipidique
70 molecules 2-pentene x
2-methyl-furan x
identified 3-methyl-butanal x
2-ethyl-furan x
1-penten-3-one x
2,3-pentanedione x
H exanal x
1-Penten-3-ol x
(E)-2-hexenal x
1-pentanol x
octanal x
20 molecules 2-penten-1-ol
2-nonanone
x
x
studied 2,4-hexadienal
2-furancarboxaldehyde x
x
(5Z )-octa-1,5-dien-3-ol x
2,4-heptadienal x
benzaldehyde x x
2-furan-methanol x
1,3-cyclo-octadiene x
WEFTA 2008, Florence – Italy, 17-19 September 2008 15
27. CONCLUSION
Aroma perception of an hydrolysate can be modulated:
– Aldehyds from lipid oxydation “fatty and vegetal”
– Aldehyds from Maillard reaction “grilled”
Positive correlation between hydrolysis degree (DG) and
Maillard reaction
WEFTA 2008, Florence – Italy, 17-19 September 2008 27
28. PERSPECTIVES
Sensory analysis on all the samples
Identification and quantification of all the molecules
Experimental design interpretation
Feed and Food applications
Modulate and control the aroma properties
WEFTA 2008, Florence – Italy, 17-19 September 2008 28
29. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Many thanks to:
Charlotte Jacobsen (DTU)
Sensory analysis panel
WEFTA 2008, Florence – Italy, 17-19 September 2008 29
30. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION
WEFTA 2008, Florence – Italy, 17-19 September 2008 30