SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Avantage Reply |Banks’ business models: Enhanced monitoring by the ECB | January 2017 | Page 1
Banks’ business models:
Enhanced monitoring by the ECB
January 2017
The Authors
Nathanael Sebbag
Senior Manager
David Denayer
Consultant
Abstract
On 15 of December 2016, the ECB published its supervisory
priorities for 2017 for banks in the Single Supervisory
Mechanism (‘SSM’). Through this second annual exercise, the
ECB furthers its aim of fostering harmonisation in supervisory
practices and increasing transparency throughout the Banking
Union. These priorities reveal the ECB’s perspectives on the
main risks facing the banking sector and will set the tone of its
supervisory activities throughout 2017.
Theses priorities further strengthen a number of initiatives
launched last year within the SSM to improve the resilience of
Eurozone banks. Three priority areas are identified:
 Business models and profitability drivers, which
remain important due ultra-low interest rates and
weak economic growth across the Eurozone;
 Credit risk, targeting high levels of non-performing
loans (‘NPLs’) and the upcoming implementation of
IFRS 9 in respect of loan provisioning; and
 Risk management, including risk governance, capital
and liquidity adequacy, risk data aggregation and
reporting (BCBS 239) and outsourcing.
This Briefing Note focuses on the business model analysis,
highlighting areas that banks should carefully evaluate to
address the requirements in a timely fashion, considering all
compliance and associated operational issues.
Introduction
The ECB’s SSM priorities are the result of an in-depth assessment
of the main risks to which the EU banking sector is exposed.
This analysis is conducted by the ECB Banking Supervision
function in collaboration with national authorities and joint
supervision teams (‘JSTs’). Among the supervisory priorities for
2017, banks’ business models and profitability drivers remain a
supervisory priority for a second consecutive year in an
environment where banks continue to face economic, financial,
competitive, and regulatory headwinds.
In practice, this priority will manifest itself in heightened
supervisory scrutiny throughout 2017 including in-depth
examinations by JSTs as part of their on-going thematic review of
banks’ business model and profitability drivers. Those will feed into
the Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process (‘SREP’), of which
the Business Model Analysis (‘BMA’) is an essential component.
Bank’s business models in a challenging
environment
The banking sector is still in the midst of an era of fundamental
change, which has pushed institutions to rethink and adapt their
business models. Some of the drivers are:
 Economic uncertainty: Despite modest signs of
improvement, the economic landscape in the Eurozone
remains challenging amid ultra-low/negative interest
rates, low economic growth and high levels of NPLs;
 Political instability: Significant uncertainties characterise
the current political landscape. In Europe, the possible
impacts of the outcome of the UK’s referendum on EU
membership for supervised banks remains unclear at
this stage; while upcoming elections in many European
Member States this year could prove highly destabilising
amid a broad-based rise of populism;
 Competitive landscape: As the digital revolution
completely reshapes the provision of financial services
and spurs the emergence of new entrants (‘FinTech’),
the established order in the banking sector is
challenged; and
 Regulatory environment: In the face of an unrelenting
wave of regulatory requirements, and as the post-crisis
regulatory agenda nears completion with the finalisation
Avantage Reply |Banks’ business models: Enhanced monitoring by the ECB | January 2017 | Page 2
Banks’ business models:
Enhanced monitoring by the ECB
January 2017
of Basel III, banks need to continually assess the overall
impact on their business models and whether certain
activities remain viable.
In certain countries, alarming levels of NPLs have been described
as the main risk to banks’ profitability. The ECB recently identified1
as one of the key risks to Eurozone financial stability an adverse
feedback loop between weak bank profitability and low nominal
growth, amid challenges in addressing high levels of non-
performing loans in some countries.
Supervisors will also consider how banks manage risks arising
from outsourced activities, which, to the extent those contribute
to the competitive position of the bank, would fall under the
scope of the BMA. In particular, supervisors will make sure banks
don’t favour cost optimisation at the expense of proper risk
management.
Banks’ business models from ECB’s point of
view
BMA is one of the four components of the SREP. While banks have
gained experience in dealing with the SSM SREP over the last two
years, this component will once again be the subject of in-depth
examinations by JSTs throughout 2017. Supervisors want to
understand the rationale for banks’ business models and improve
their knowledge of the underlying drivers of profitability (e.g. to
assess any excessive risk-taking). The BMA focuses on the
following elements:
 Identification of the areas of focus, including analysis of
the bank’s main activities, geographic presence and
market position;
 Assessment of the business environment, including the
current and likely future market conditions the bank is
subject to;
 Analysis of the forward-looking strategy and financial
plans, including a review of the assumptions, plausibility
and riskiness of the bank’s business strategy;
 Assessment of the business model, at different time
horizons and based on the previous analyses; and
 Assessment key vulnerabilities, for example risk
concentrations or optimistic economic forecasts.
1 European Central Bank, Financial Stability Review, November 2016, p10
The analysis results in a score (1 to 4) reflecting the risks the
business model poses to the bank’s viability and sustainability.
Below is a conceptual overview2 of the business model review:
The SSM business model review contains 3 phases
1
Collect
information and
understand the
relevance of
business lines
• Contribution of business lines to income, profits and
risks.
• What are the business lines that drive important risk
factors?
• Reporting.
• Any relevant internal or external information.
2
Assess the bank’s
capacity to
generate profits
• An automatic score mainly based on the RoA and
the cost income ratio.
• Comparison of the results to predefined thresholds,
and global scores.
3
Exhaustive
analysis –
supervisor view
• Used to adjust the scores of phase 2 above by
taking into account bank’s specificities.
• More than 60 indicators based on normative
reports and of supervision allow comparisons
between banks.
Consistency between the business model and
strategy
Far from being a stand-alone issue, the focus on banks’ business
models clearly interacts with other supervisory priorities
focusing on the integration with decision-making process.
Through the BMA, the ECB intends to foster the adoption by
banks of a genuinely risk-based approach to strategic planning. In
that context, the consistency of the business objectives and
strategic decisions with key strategic processes such as the Risk
Appetite Framework (‘RAF’), Internal Capital and Liquidity
Adequacy Assessment Processes, (‘ICAAP’ and ‘ILAAP’) and
budgeting process is key.
In particular, the RAF is a useful instrument to evidence strong
Board engagement in the oversight of risk. In this regard, the
results of the thematic review on governance and risk appetite
showed that much progress remains to be made before the RAF
is truly embedded into decision-making.
2 Adapted from SREP methodology booklet
Avantage Reply |Banks’ business models: Enhanced monitoring by the ECB | January 2017 | Page 3
Banks’ business models:
Enhanced monitoring by the ECB
January 2017
The maturity of ICAAP and ILAAP processes varies by country and
there is much to be done to harmonise practices in the Eurozone.
RAF, ICAAP and ILAAP frameworks must be integrated including:
ccommon metrics and consistent calibrations; integrated scenario;
and integrated and consistent processes, controls and governance.
The Single Resolution Board (‘SRB’) will also take stock of banks’
business models throughout its resolution planning activities,
with the view of identifying critical functions and addressing
barriers to resolvability. The ECB and the SRB actively cooperate
in this field.
Conclusions
The consequences of having vulnerable business models with
inadequate analysis and risk management and poor integration
with strategy may give rise not only additional capital or liquidity
requirements but also additional supervisory measures tailored to
banks’ specific weaknesses. Banks’ return to sustainable
profitability hinges upon their ability to adapt their business mix to
the new operating environment. Supervisors will closely monitor
this evolution as part of the SREP.
Since the crisis, banks have steadily improved their capital strength
– both in terms of quantity and quality of capital components – and
liquidity positions. However, banks’ profitability remains subdued,
particularly compared to the pre-crisis era.
These challenges call for continuous evaluation of banks’ business
models, including balance sheet composition (both exposures and
funding profile), business activity mix, customer base and
geographic locations.
Finally, it would be wise for banks to anticipate supervisory actions
(e.g. through performing strategic and business risk self-
assessment) in order to take timely action.
About Avantage Reply
Avantage Reply (a member of the Reply Group) is a pan-European
specialised management consultancy delivering change initiatives
in Risk, Compliance, Finance (Capital Management and Regulatory
Reporting), Treasury and Operations within the Financial Services
industry.
Within our core competencies, we have extensive experience in
implementing changes driven by:
 Industry-wide legislative and regulatory initiatives (e.g.
CRD, BRRD, MiFID);
 Mergers, Acquisitions & Divestments (e.g. business
combination, separation and flotation); and
 Business improvement and optimisation agendas (e.g.
risk appetite and capital allocation).
We are available to discuss in more detail the impacts of the SREP
BMA framework and its implications on your organisation.
Avantage Reply |Banks’ business models: Enhanced monitoring by the ECB | January 2017 | Page 4
Banks’ business models:
Enhanced monitoring by the ECB
January 2017
Contacts
Avantage Reply (Amsterdam)
The Atrium | Strawinskylaan 3051
1077 ZX Amsterdam
Netherlands
Tel: +31 (0) 20 301 2123
E-mail: avantage@reply.eu
Avantage Reply (Brussels)
5, rue du Congrès/Congresstraat
1000 Brussels
Belgium
Tel: +32 (0) 2 88 00 32 0
E-mail: avantage@reply.eu
Avantage Reply (London)
38 Grosvenor Gardens
London SW1W 0EB
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 (0) 207 730 6000
E-mail: avantage@reply.eu
Avantage Reply (Luxembourg)
46a, avenue J.F. Kennedy
1855 Luxembourg
Luxembourg
Tel: +352 26 00 52 64
E-mail: avantage @reply.eu
Avantage Reply (Milan)
Via Castellanza, 11
20151 Milano
Italy
Tel: +39 02 535761
E-mail: avantage@reply.it
Avantage Reply (Paris)
3 rue du Faubourg Saint-honoré
75008 Paris
France
Tel: 33 (0) 1 71 24 12 25
E-mail: avantage@reply.eu
Avantage Reply (Rome)
V.le Regina Margherita, 8
00198 Roma
Italy
Tel: +39 06 844341
E-mail: avantage@reply.it
Avantage Reply (Turin)
Via Cardinale Massaia, 83
10147 Torino
Italy
Tel: +39 011 29101
E-mail: avantage@reply.it
Xuccess Reply (Berlin)
Mauerstrasse 79
10117 Berlin
Germany
Tel: +49 (30) 443 232-80
E-mails: xuccess@reply.de
Xuccess Reply (Frankfurt)
Hahnstrasse 68-70
60528 Frankfurt am Main
Germany
Tel: +49 (0) 69 669 643-25
E-mail: xuccess@reply.de
Xuccess Reply (Hamburg)
Brook 1
20457 Hamburg
Germany
Tel: +49 (40) 890 0988-0
E-mail: xuccess@reply.de
Xuccess Reply (Munich)
Arnulfstrasse 27
80335 München
Germany
Tel: +49 (0) 89 - 411142-0
E-mail: xuccess@reply.de

More Related Content

What's hot

A Quantitative Analysis of Indian Banks’ Performance and Efficiency-A Panel R...
A Quantitative Analysis of Indian Banks’ Performance and Efficiency-A Panel R...A Quantitative Analysis of Indian Banks’ Performance and Efficiency-A Panel R...
A Quantitative Analysis of Indian Banks’ Performance and Efficiency-A Panel R...
Saurabh Trivedi
 
26 jurnal internasional factor affecting the implementation of gcg in contro...
26  jurnal internasional factor affecting the implementation of gcg in contro...26  jurnal internasional factor affecting the implementation of gcg in contro...
26 jurnal internasional factor affecting the implementation of gcg in contro...
Aminullah Assagaf
 
Efma_BCG_point of view_pricing for banking
Efma_BCG_point of view_pricing for bankingEfma_BCG_point of view_pricing for banking
Efma_BCG_point of view_pricing for banking
Britt Dejager
 
Mr.mahapatra
Mr.mahapatraMr.mahapatra
Mr.mahapatra
Arun Sahu
 
bank of new york mellon corp 4q 07 earnings
bank of new york mellon corp 4q 07 earningsbank of new york mellon corp 4q 07 earnings
bank of new york mellon corp 4q 07 earnings
finance18
 
Financial performance and identify affecting factors in this performance of n...
Financial performance and identify affecting factors in this performance of n...Financial performance and identify affecting factors in this performance of n...
Financial performance and identify affecting factors in this performance of n...
Alexander Decker
 
Booklet - GRA White Papers - Second Edition
Booklet - GRA White Papers - Second EditionBooklet - GRA White Papers - Second Edition
Booklet - GRA White Papers - Second Edition
Ziad Fares
 
UVA_Template ACCv1
UVA_Template ACCv1UVA_Template ACCv1
UVA_Template ACCv1
Gene Crouch, MBA
 
Fiscal Planning and Public Finance Management Reforms
Fiscal Planning and Public Finance Management ReformsFiscal Planning and Public Finance Management Reforms
Fiscal Planning and Public Finance Management Reforms
Jean-Marc Lepain
 
2014.06.13 - NAEC EDRC Seminar_Macroprudential policy: Banks risk & Capital C...
2014.06.13 - NAEC EDRC Seminar_Macroprudential policy: Banks risk & Capital C...2014.06.13 - NAEC EDRC Seminar_Macroprudential policy: Banks risk & Capital C...
2014.06.13 - NAEC EDRC Seminar_Macroprudential policy: Banks risk & Capital C...
OECD_NAEC
 

What's hot (10)

A Quantitative Analysis of Indian Banks’ Performance and Efficiency-A Panel R...
A Quantitative Analysis of Indian Banks’ Performance and Efficiency-A Panel R...A Quantitative Analysis of Indian Banks’ Performance and Efficiency-A Panel R...
A Quantitative Analysis of Indian Banks’ Performance and Efficiency-A Panel R...
 
26 jurnal internasional factor affecting the implementation of gcg in contro...
26  jurnal internasional factor affecting the implementation of gcg in contro...26  jurnal internasional factor affecting the implementation of gcg in contro...
26 jurnal internasional factor affecting the implementation of gcg in contro...
 
Efma_BCG_point of view_pricing for banking
Efma_BCG_point of view_pricing for bankingEfma_BCG_point of view_pricing for banking
Efma_BCG_point of view_pricing for banking
 
Mr.mahapatra
Mr.mahapatraMr.mahapatra
Mr.mahapatra
 
bank of new york mellon corp 4q 07 earnings
bank of new york mellon corp 4q 07 earningsbank of new york mellon corp 4q 07 earnings
bank of new york mellon corp 4q 07 earnings
 
Financial performance and identify affecting factors in this performance of n...
Financial performance and identify affecting factors in this performance of n...Financial performance and identify affecting factors in this performance of n...
Financial performance and identify affecting factors in this performance of n...
 
Booklet - GRA White Papers - Second Edition
Booklet - GRA White Papers - Second EditionBooklet - GRA White Papers - Second Edition
Booklet - GRA White Papers - Second Edition
 
UVA_Template ACCv1
UVA_Template ACCv1UVA_Template ACCv1
UVA_Template ACCv1
 
Fiscal Planning and Public Finance Management Reforms
Fiscal Planning and Public Finance Management ReformsFiscal Planning and Public Finance Management Reforms
Fiscal Planning and Public Finance Management Reforms
 
2014.06.13 - NAEC EDRC Seminar_Macroprudential policy: Banks risk & Capital C...
2014.06.13 - NAEC EDRC Seminar_Macroprudential policy: Banks risk & Capital C...2014.06.13 - NAEC EDRC Seminar_Macroprudential policy: Banks risk & Capital C...
2014.06.13 - NAEC EDRC Seminar_Macroprudential policy: Banks risk & Capital C...
 

Similar to AR-Banks-BMA-2017_vpub

Bank News 14_Veng--Jul 15
Bank News 14_Veng--Jul 15Bank News 14_Veng--Jul 15
Bank News 14_Veng--Jul 15
annie chan
 
Driving Business Value Through Stress Testing - Final
Driving Business Value Through Stress Testing - FinalDriving Business Value Through Stress Testing - Final
Driving Business Value Through Stress Testing - Final
Nanda Thiruvengadam
 
CEIS Review Q2 2016
CEIS Review Q2 2016CEIS Review Q2 2016
CEIS Review Q2 2016
CEIS Review INC.
 
The Interest Rate Risk on the Banking Book
The Interest Rate Risk on the Banking BookThe Interest Rate Risk on the Banking Book
The Interest Rate Risk on the Banking Book
GRATeam
 
DETERMINANTS OF BANK-SPECIFIC AND MACROECONOMIC FACTORS THAT ARE AFFECTING T...
 DETERMINANTS OF BANK-SPECIFIC AND MACROECONOMIC FACTORS THAT ARE AFFECTING T... DETERMINANTS OF BANK-SPECIFIC AND MACROECONOMIC FACTORS THAT ARE AFFECTING T...
DETERMINANTS OF BANK-SPECIFIC AND MACROECONOMIC FACTORS THAT ARE AFFECTING T...
Uni-assignment
 
Hiệu quả hoạt động ngân hàng
Hiệu quả hoạt động ngân hàngHiệu quả hoạt động ngân hàng
Hiệu quả hoạt động ngân hàng
Phạm Đức Huy
 
Blog 2017 01_irrbb - basel irrbb guidelines
Blog 2017 01_irrbb - basel irrbb guidelinesBlog 2017 01_irrbb - basel irrbb guidelines
Blog 2017 01_irrbb - basel irrbb guidelines
Sandip Mukherjee CFA, FRM
 
risk-weighted-assets-capital-management-2016
risk-weighted-assets-capital-management-2016risk-weighted-assets-capital-management-2016
risk-weighted-assets-capital-management-2016
Timothy Jung
 
07 Bank and Policy Journal ISSN 2790-1041.pdf
07 Bank and Policy Journal ISSN 2790-1041.pdf07 Bank and Policy Journal ISSN 2790-1041.pdf
07 Bank and Policy Journal ISSN 2790-1041.pdf
PublisherNasir
 
K411118121.pdf
K411118121.pdfK411118121.pdf
K411118121.pdf
aijbm
 
MTBiz April-June 2013
MTBiz April-June 2013MTBiz April-June 2013
MTBiz April-June 2013
Mutual Trust Bank Ltd.
 
Accenture capital optimize
Accenture capital optimizeAccenture capital optimize
Accenture capital optimize
Anatoly Yakorev
 
Monday September 24 2012 - Top 10 Risk Management News
Monday September 24 2012 - Top 10 Risk Management NewsMonday September 24 2012 - Top 10 Risk Management News
Monday September 24 2012 - Top 10 Risk Management News
Compliance LLC
 
Camel model
Camel modelCamel model
Camel model
Vaza Hitesh
 
Strategic control and management systems. enterprise risk management as the l...
Strategic control and management systems. enterprise risk management as the l...Strategic control and management systems. enterprise risk management as the l...
Strategic control and management systems. enterprise risk management as the l...
Sergio Guida
 
An Evaluation of Camels Rating System as a Measure of Bank Performance
An Evaluation of Camels Rating System as a Measure of Bank PerformanceAn Evaluation of Camels Rating System as a Measure of Bank Performance
An Evaluation of Camels Rating System as a Measure of Bank Performance
Abu Hasan Al-Nahiyan
 
Bank gaborone
Bank gaboroneBank gaborone
Bank gaborone
nguquko change
 
Basel III News, September 2012
Basel III News, September 2012Basel III News, September 2012
Basel III News, September 2012
Compliance LLC
 
Crystal Gazing - Estimating Lifetime PDs
Crystal Gazing - Estimating Lifetime PDsCrystal Gazing - Estimating Lifetime PDs
Crystal Gazing - Estimating Lifetime PDs
Sandip Mukherjee CFA, FRM
 
Stress Testing Commercial Real Estate Loans – No Time Like the Present
Stress Testing Commercial Real Estate Loans – No Time Like the PresentStress Testing Commercial Real Estate Loans – No Time Like the Present
Stress Testing Commercial Real Estate Loans – No Time Like the Present
CBIZ, Inc.
 

Similar to AR-Banks-BMA-2017_vpub (20)

Bank News 14_Veng--Jul 15
Bank News 14_Veng--Jul 15Bank News 14_Veng--Jul 15
Bank News 14_Veng--Jul 15
 
Driving Business Value Through Stress Testing - Final
Driving Business Value Through Stress Testing - FinalDriving Business Value Through Stress Testing - Final
Driving Business Value Through Stress Testing - Final
 
CEIS Review Q2 2016
CEIS Review Q2 2016CEIS Review Q2 2016
CEIS Review Q2 2016
 
The Interest Rate Risk on the Banking Book
The Interest Rate Risk on the Banking BookThe Interest Rate Risk on the Banking Book
The Interest Rate Risk on the Banking Book
 
DETERMINANTS OF BANK-SPECIFIC AND MACROECONOMIC FACTORS THAT ARE AFFECTING T...
 DETERMINANTS OF BANK-SPECIFIC AND MACROECONOMIC FACTORS THAT ARE AFFECTING T... DETERMINANTS OF BANK-SPECIFIC AND MACROECONOMIC FACTORS THAT ARE AFFECTING T...
DETERMINANTS OF BANK-SPECIFIC AND MACROECONOMIC FACTORS THAT ARE AFFECTING T...
 
Hiệu quả hoạt động ngân hàng
Hiệu quả hoạt động ngân hàngHiệu quả hoạt động ngân hàng
Hiệu quả hoạt động ngân hàng
 
Blog 2017 01_irrbb - basel irrbb guidelines
Blog 2017 01_irrbb - basel irrbb guidelinesBlog 2017 01_irrbb - basel irrbb guidelines
Blog 2017 01_irrbb - basel irrbb guidelines
 
risk-weighted-assets-capital-management-2016
risk-weighted-assets-capital-management-2016risk-weighted-assets-capital-management-2016
risk-weighted-assets-capital-management-2016
 
07 Bank and Policy Journal ISSN 2790-1041.pdf
07 Bank and Policy Journal ISSN 2790-1041.pdf07 Bank and Policy Journal ISSN 2790-1041.pdf
07 Bank and Policy Journal ISSN 2790-1041.pdf
 
K411118121.pdf
K411118121.pdfK411118121.pdf
K411118121.pdf
 
MTBiz April-June 2013
MTBiz April-June 2013MTBiz April-June 2013
MTBiz April-June 2013
 
Accenture capital optimize
Accenture capital optimizeAccenture capital optimize
Accenture capital optimize
 
Monday September 24 2012 - Top 10 Risk Management News
Monday September 24 2012 - Top 10 Risk Management NewsMonday September 24 2012 - Top 10 Risk Management News
Monday September 24 2012 - Top 10 Risk Management News
 
Camel model
Camel modelCamel model
Camel model
 
Strategic control and management systems. enterprise risk management as the l...
Strategic control and management systems. enterprise risk management as the l...Strategic control and management systems. enterprise risk management as the l...
Strategic control and management systems. enterprise risk management as the l...
 
An Evaluation of Camels Rating System as a Measure of Bank Performance
An Evaluation of Camels Rating System as a Measure of Bank PerformanceAn Evaluation of Camels Rating System as a Measure of Bank Performance
An Evaluation of Camels Rating System as a Measure of Bank Performance
 
Bank gaborone
Bank gaboroneBank gaborone
Bank gaborone
 
Basel III News, September 2012
Basel III News, September 2012Basel III News, September 2012
Basel III News, September 2012
 
Crystal Gazing - Estimating Lifetime PDs
Crystal Gazing - Estimating Lifetime PDsCrystal Gazing - Estimating Lifetime PDs
Crystal Gazing - Estimating Lifetime PDs
 
Stress Testing Commercial Real Estate Loans – No Time Like the Present
Stress Testing Commercial Real Estate Loans – No Time Like the PresentStress Testing Commercial Real Estate Loans – No Time Like the Present
Stress Testing Commercial Real Estate Loans – No Time Like the Present
 

AR-Banks-BMA-2017_vpub

  • 1. Avantage Reply |Banks’ business models: Enhanced monitoring by the ECB | January 2017 | Page 1 Banks’ business models: Enhanced monitoring by the ECB January 2017 The Authors Nathanael Sebbag Senior Manager David Denayer Consultant Abstract On 15 of December 2016, the ECB published its supervisory priorities for 2017 for banks in the Single Supervisory Mechanism (‘SSM’). Through this second annual exercise, the ECB furthers its aim of fostering harmonisation in supervisory practices and increasing transparency throughout the Banking Union. These priorities reveal the ECB’s perspectives on the main risks facing the banking sector and will set the tone of its supervisory activities throughout 2017. Theses priorities further strengthen a number of initiatives launched last year within the SSM to improve the resilience of Eurozone banks. Three priority areas are identified:  Business models and profitability drivers, which remain important due ultra-low interest rates and weak economic growth across the Eurozone;  Credit risk, targeting high levels of non-performing loans (‘NPLs’) and the upcoming implementation of IFRS 9 in respect of loan provisioning; and  Risk management, including risk governance, capital and liquidity adequacy, risk data aggregation and reporting (BCBS 239) and outsourcing. This Briefing Note focuses on the business model analysis, highlighting areas that banks should carefully evaluate to address the requirements in a timely fashion, considering all compliance and associated operational issues. Introduction The ECB’s SSM priorities are the result of an in-depth assessment of the main risks to which the EU banking sector is exposed. This analysis is conducted by the ECB Banking Supervision function in collaboration with national authorities and joint supervision teams (‘JSTs’). Among the supervisory priorities for 2017, banks’ business models and profitability drivers remain a supervisory priority for a second consecutive year in an environment where banks continue to face economic, financial, competitive, and regulatory headwinds. In practice, this priority will manifest itself in heightened supervisory scrutiny throughout 2017 including in-depth examinations by JSTs as part of their on-going thematic review of banks’ business model and profitability drivers. Those will feed into the Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process (‘SREP’), of which the Business Model Analysis (‘BMA’) is an essential component. Bank’s business models in a challenging environment The banking sector is still in the midst of an era of fundamental change, which has pushed institutions to rethink and adapt their business models. Some of the drivers are:  Economic uncertainty: Despite modest signs of improvement, the economic landscape in the Eurozone remains challenging amid ultra-low/negative interest rates, low economic growth and high levels of NPLs;  Political instability: Significant uncertainties characterise the current political landscape. In Europe, the possible impacts of the outcome of the UK’s referendum on EU membership for supervised banks remains unclear at this stage; while upcoming elections in many European Member States this year could prove highly destabilising amid a broad-based rise of populism;  Competitive landscape: As the digital revolution completely reshapes the provision of financial services and spurs the emergence of new entrants (‘FinTech’), the established order in the banking sector is challenged; and  Regulatory environment: In the face of an unrelenting wave of regulatory requirements, and as the post-crisis regulatory agenda nears completion with the finalisation
  • 2. Avantage Reply |Banks’ business models: Enhanced monitoring by the ECB | January 2017 | Page 2 Banks’ business models: Enhanced monitoring by the ECB January 2017 of Basel III, banks need to continually assess the overall impact on their business models and whether certain activities remain viable. In certain countries, alarming levels of NPLs have been described as the main risk to banks’ profitability. The ECB recently identified1 as one of the key risks to Eurozone financial stability an adverse feedback loop between weak bank profitability and low nominal growth, amid challenges in addressing high levels of non- performing loans in some countries. Supervisors will also consider how banks manage risks arising from outsourced activities, which, to the extent those contribute to the competitive position of the bank, would fall under the scope of the BMA. In particular, supervisors will make sure banks don’t favour cost optimisation at the expense of proper risk management. Banks’ business models from ECB’s point of view BMA is one of the four components of the SREP. While banks have gained experience in dealing with the SSM SREP over the last two years, this component will once again be the subject of in-depth examinations by JSTs throughout 2017. Supervisors want to understand the rationale for banks’ business models and improve their knowledge of the underlying drivers of profitability (e.g. to assess any excessive risk-taking). The BMA focuses on the following elements:  Identification of the areas of focus, including analysis of the bank’s main activities, geographic presence and market position;  Assessment of the business environment, including the current and likely future market conditions the bank is subject to;  Analysis of the forward-looking strategy and financial plans, including a review of the assumptions, plausibility and riskiness of the bank’s business strategy;  Assessment of the business model, at different time horizons and based on the previous analyses; and  Assessment key vulnerabilities, for example risk concentrations or optimistic economic forecasts. 1 European Central Bank, Financial Stability Review, November 2016, p10 The analysis results in a score (1 to 4) reflecting the risks the business model poses to the bank’s viability and sustainability. Below is a conceptual overview2 of the business model review: The SSM business model review contains 3 phases 1 Collect information and understand the relevance of business lines • Contribution of business lines to income, profits and risks. • What are the business lines that drive important risk factors? • Reporting. • Any relevant internal or external information. 2 Assess the bank’s capacity to generate profits • An automatic score mainly based on the RoA and the cost income ratio. • Comparison of the results to predefined thresholds, and global scores. 3 Exhaustive analysis – supervisor view • Used to adjust the scores of phase 2 above by taking into account bank’s specificities. • More than 60 indicators based on normative reports and of supervision allow comparisons between banks. Consistency between the business model and strategy Far from being a stand-alone issue, the focus on banks’ business models clearly interacts with other supervisory priorities focusing on the integration with decision-making process. Through the BMA, the ECB intends to foster the adoption by banks of a genuinely risk-based approach to strategic planning. In that context, the consistency of the business objectives and strategic decisions with key strategic processes such as the Risk Appetite Framework (‘RAF’), Internal Capital and Liquidity Adequacy Assessment Processes, (‘ICAAP’ and ‘ILAAP’) and budgeting process is key. In particular, the RAF is a useful instrument to evidence strong Board engagement in the oversight of risk. In this regard, the results of the thematic review on governance and risk appetite showed that much progress remains to be made before the RAF is truly embedded into decision-making. 2 Adapted from SREP methodology booklet
  • 3. Avantage Reply |Banks’ business models: Enhanced monitoring by the ECB | January 2017 | Page 3 Banks’ business models: Enhanced monitoring by the ECB January 2017 The maturity of ICAAP and ILAAP processes varies by country and there is much to be done to harmonise practices in the Eurozone. RAF, ICAAP and ILAAP frameworks must be integrated including: ccommon metrics and consistent calibrations; integrated scenario; and integrated and consistent processes, controls and governance. The Single Resolution Board (‘SRB’) will also take stock of banks’ business models throughout its resolution planning activities, with the view of identifying critical functions and addressing barriers to resolvability. The ECB and the SRB actively cooperate in this field. Conclusions The consequences of having vulnerable business models with inadequate analysis and risk management and poor integration with strategy may give rise not only additional capital or liquidity requirements but also additional supervisory measures tailored to banks’ specific weaknesses. Banks’ return to sustainable profitability hinges upon their ability to adapt their business mix to the new operating environment. Supervisors will closely monitor this evolution as part of the SREP. Since the crisis, banks have steadily improved their capital strength – both in terms of quantity and quality of capital components – and liquidity positions. However, banks’ profitability remains subdued, particularly compared to the pre-crisis era. These challenges call for continuous evaluation of banks’ business models, including balance sheet composition (both exposures and funding profile), business activity mix, customer base and geographic locations. Finally, it would be wise for banks to anticipate supervisory actions (e.g. through performing strategic and business risk self- assessment) in order to take timely action. About Avantage Reply Avantage Reply (a member of the Reply Group) is a pan-European specialised management consultancy delivering change initiatives in Risk, Compliance, Finance (Capital Management and Regulatory Reporting), Treasury and Operations within the Financial Services industry. Within our core competencies, we have extensive experience in implementing changes driven by:  Industry-wide legislative and regulatory initiatives (e.g. CRD, BRRD, MiFID);  Mergers, Acquisitions & Divestments (e.g. business combination, separation and flotation); and  Business improvement and optimisation agendas (e.g. risk appetite and capital allocation). We are available to discuss in more detail the impacts of the SREP BMA framework and its implications on your organisation.
  • 4. Avantage Reply |Banks’ business models: Enhanced monitoring by the ECB | January 2017 | Page 4 Banks’ business models: Enhanced monitoring by the ECB January 2017 Contacts Avantage Reply (Amsterdam) The Atrium | Strawinskylaan 3051 1077 ZX Amsterdam Netherlands Tel: +31 (0) 20 301 2123 E-mail: avantage@reply.eu Avantage Reply (Brussels) 5, rue du Congrès/Congresstraat 1000 Brussels Belgium Tel: +32 (0) 2 88 00 32 0 E-mail: avantage@reply.eu Avantage Reply (London) 38 Grosvenor Gardens London SW1W 0EB United Kingdom Tel: +44 (0) 207 730 6000 E-mail: avantage@reply.eu Avantage Reply (Luxembourg) 46a, avenue J.F. Kennedy 1855 Luxembourg Luxembourg Tel: +352 26 00 52 64 E-mail: avantage @reply.eu Avantage Reply (Milan) Via Castellanza, 11 20151 Milano Italy Tel: +39 02 535761 E-mail: avantage@reply.it Avantage Reply (Paris) 3 rue du Faubourg Saint-honoré 75008 Paris France Tel: 33 (0) 1 71 24 12 25 E-mail: avantage@reply.eu Avantage Reply (Rome) V.le Regina Margherita, 8 00198 Roma Italy Tel: +39 06 844341 E-mail: avantage@reply.it Avantage Reply (Turin) Via Cardinale Massaia, 83 10147 Torino Italy Tel: +39 011 29101 E-mail: avantage@reply.it Xuccess Reply (Berlin) Mauerstrasse 79 10117 Berlin Germany Tel: +49 (30) 443 232-80 E-mails: xuccess@reply.de Xuccess Reply (Frankfurt) Hahnstrasse 68-70 60528 Frankfurt am Main Germany Tel: +49 (0) 69 669 643-25 E-mail: xuccess@reply.de Xuccess Reply (Hamburg) Brook 1 20457 Hamburg Germany Tel: +49 (40) 890 0988-0 E-mail: xuccess@reply.de Xuccess Reply (Munich) Arnulfstrasse 27 80335 München Germany Tel: +49 (0) 89 - 411142-0 E-mail: xuccess@reply.de