El 29 de marzo de 2016 celebramos un Simposio Internacional sobre el 'Impacto de las ciencias ómicas en la medicina, nutrición y biotecnología'. Organizado por la Fundación Ramón Areces en colaboración con la Real Academia Nacional de Medicina y BioEuroLatina, abordó cómo un mejor conocimiento del genoma humano está permitiendo notables avances hacia una medicina de precisión.
VIP Mumbai Call Girls Hiranandani Gardens Just Call 9920874524 with A/C Room ...
Ana Ramírez de Molina-El impacto de las ciencias ómicas en la medicina, la nutrición y la biotecnología
1. Cancer therapies: more precise
personalized approaches
Impacto de las ciencias ómicas en la medicina, nutrición y biotecnología
Fundacion Ramon Areces
29 Marzo de 2016
Ana Ramírez de Molina
Grupo de Oncología Molecular y Genómica Nutricional del Cáncer
Instituto IMDEA Alimentación
2. Cancer
Cancer is caused by genetic alterations that lead to cellular malfunction.
Despite first tumor was resected 200 years ago, cancer currently constitutes
the second leading cause of death and disability in developed countries
3. Cancer Research
• Discovery of the first cellularoncogene
H. E. Varmusand M. Bishop. 1976
• Relationshipbetween virus
andcancer. P. Rous. 1910
•”The Seed an Soil Hypothesis”.
StevenPaget. 1889
• Cancer caused in laboratory
animals.1915
• Relationshipbetween mutations
andcancer. Theodor Bovery. 1914
•Isolationof the first tumor suppressor
gene. Stephen H. Friend. 1986
1950
1900
2013
1975
1800
1825
1850
1875
1925
• Extirpation of the first ovarian
tumor. E. McDowell. 1809
• First uses of cancer
radiotherapy.
• First uses of cancer
chemotherapy.
Using nitrogen mustards
(1943) and Folic acid
antagonists(1948)
Developmentof anesthetic
techniques.1846
Developmentof antiseptic
techniques.1867
Discovery of X-rays (1895)
andRadium (1898)
Technologydevelopmentfor
the productionof antibiotics.
1975
S
U
R
G
E
R
Y
R
A
D
I
O
T
H
E
R
A
P
Y
C
H
E
M
O
T
H
E
R
A
P
Y
I
N
M
U
N
O
T
H
E
R
A
P
Y
Anticancerdrugs based on
genetic alterations
1976: Src cellular oncogene
1981: Human oncogenes
1984: erbB2 truncated growth
factor
1986: Rb tumor supressor
1993: Ras signalling pathway
1996: Cloning telomerase
1999: Tumor molecular profiling
(OMICS)
2001: First specific therapies
(Gleevec FDA Approval)
Oncología traslacional:
De la biología Molecular
a la Clínica
Ramos R et al., 2013. In Applications of
Advanced Omics Technologies, Elsevier,
2013
4. Cancer is a genetic disease, but also a metabolic
disease, immune disease, environmental disease….
Comprises more than 100 different diseases
that share common features
The hallmarks of cancer: the next
generation, Hannahan &
Weinberg, Cell 2011
Cancer
Different mutations in
different patients and
different cancer subtypes
5. Image adapted from http://www.personalizedmedicinecoalition.org/Userfiles/PMC-Corporate/file/pmc_age_of_pmc_factsheet.pdf. Li et al. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(8):1039.
Traditional “One-Size-Fits All” Approach
All patients with the same diagnosis receive
same treatment
Precision Medicine Approach
Treatment strategy based on
patient’s unique genetic profile
Genetic Profile A
Targeted Therapy
Genetic Profile B
Standard Therapy
Precise Treatment Approach Based on Molecular Features
-omics
Treatment decisions based on tumour phenotype and
genomic profile maximize efficacy and minimize toxicity
6. • Molecular alterations are PRE- clinical manifestation: early detection
(DIAGNOSTIC AND PROGNOSTIC BIOMARKERS)
• Tumors with different molecular alterations respond to different
therapeutic strategies: personalization of treatment (TARGETED
THERAPIES)
First mutation
Second
mutation
Third
mutation
Additional
mutations
Uncontrolled
growth
Clinical manifestation
Molecular mechanism of the disease ---- Molecular mechanism of treatment
7. Revolution in Cancer Molecular Diagnosis Involves High-
Throughput Technology
Old
New
Li et al. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(8):1039.
Molecular profiling: OMICS
12. LIPID METABOLISM ALTERATIONS IN CANCER
Metabolic alterations sustain increased
energetic and structural demands of
tumor cells for uncontrolled growth
Lipid
metabolism
Membranes
synthesis
Membranes
saturation
Lipid dropplets
NADPH oxidation
Lipid hormones
Cell growth
Oxidative stress
resistance
Survival
Redox balance
Proliferation
and invassionAdipose
tissue
Tumor microenviroment
Warbourg effect
The hallmarks of cancer: the next generation
Hannahan & Weinberg, Cell 2011
Adaptado de Santos y Schulze, 2012
Glucose
metabolism
Energy
13. 12, 829–846 , 2013
Including personalized nutrition for prevention and treatment
improvement of patients with gastric cancer
Gastric cancer
Lipid metabolism
Molecular Epidemiological
evidence evidence
Therapeutic
nutritional
intervention
54,4%
preventable
Targeted
therapy
Molecular
biomarkers
LIPID METABOLISM ALTERATIONS IN CANCER
14. FOOD and HEALTH
The problem of chronic diseases, NIH, 2012
Population suffering from more than one
chronic conditions
15. The evolution of Food Science Research
Diet, body maintenance, epidemiological
studies, healthy nutrition
Disease prevention, bioactive ingredient,
molecular mechanisms, genotype-phenotype
Targeted personalized nutritional strategies that promote health
Efficiently improve prevention and treatment of chronic diseases based on:
• The molecular mechanisms of the effects of bioactive compounds and nutrients
• Genetic profiles involved in the inter-individual differential susceptibility to disease and
response to diet
The human genome project
-omic technologies
GENETIC
FACTOR
+ ENVIRONMENTAL
FACTOR
16. Lipid metabolism
Colon cancer
development and
progression
Bioactive
compounds
Metabolic reprograming
to substain increased energetic
and structural requirements of
tumoral cells
Metabolic homeostasis restoration
Characteristics nº of Patients (%) nº of Patients (%) nº of Patients (%)
T otal sample size (n) 77 (100) 119 (100) 120 (100)
Age at Diagnosis (years)
Mean 68·22 66·08 ---
Median 69 66 ---
Age Range 32-86 26-91 33-88
≤50 3 (3·90) 15 (12·60) 15 (12·5)
50-70 39 (50·65) 58 (48·74) 63 (52·5)
≥70 35 (45·45) 46 (38·66) 42 (35)
Sex
Female 33 (42·86) 54 (45·38) 60 (50)
Male 44 (57·14) 65 (54·62) 60 (50)
Stage
IIA (T3 N0 M0) 56 (72·73) 70 (58·82) 99 (82·5)
IIB (T4 N0 M0) 21 (27·27) 49 (41·18) 21 (17·5)
Regional Lymph Node M etastasis
No Lymph node involvement (N0) 77 (100) 119 (100) 120 (100)
1-3 Lymph node involvement (N1)
Training group Validation group I Validation group II
Stage II CRC
Training set
Hospital La Paz
(2000-2004)
Validation set
Hospital La Paz
(2004-2008)
Validation set II
GEMCAD
(H. Clinic, H. La Fe, IVO)
Validation set III
GSE39582 series
Gene Expression
Omnibus Database
(n=264)
Global metabolic analysis of colon cancer tumors (early stage) of different sets of patients from different hospitals:
Clinic Hospital
La Fe University Hospital
IVO
LIPID METABOLISM ALTERATIONS IN CANCER
19. 1.- ABCA1: Cholesterol efflux
(tumor microenviroment)
3 key pathways:
Lipid metabolism
Colon cancer
development and
progression Tumor metabolic reprograming
2.- ACSL/SCD network: fatty acid activation
(invasiveness)
3.- GCNT3: protein glycosilation (response to treatment)
20. ACSL / SCD
network
Confers migratory and invasive
properties to cancer cells
Fatty acid activation (ACSL) to enter into metabolic pathways
SCD to avoid lipotoxicity
0 20 40 60 80
0.00.20.40.60.81.0
x3 - Training group
Time (months)
Disease-freesurvival
P.Log < 0.001
Low Risk
High Risk
0 20 40 60 80
0.00.20.40.60.81.0
x3 - Validation group
Time (months)
Disease-freesurvival
P.Log < 0.001
Low Risk
High Risk
OVEREXPRESSED ACSL/SCD NETWORK HIGH RISK OF RELAPSE
Molecular
biomarkers
21. Normal colonocytes CCD18Co
Combination of low doses Triacsin C/A939572 5-FU resistant Colon
Cancer Cells
Targeting of ACSL1/ACSL4/SCD axis on colon
cancer cells by chemical inhibitors means could
represent a promising therapeutic strategy
(Triacsin C: vasodilator); Drug repurposing?
SYNERGISTIC EFFECT OF ACSLS AND SCD INHIBITORS ON CRC CELLS
1µM T + 0.1µM A1µM TDMSO 0.1µM A
No ORF
x3
Targeted
Therapy
22. Protein glycosilation
(GCNT3)
Low GCNT3 (deficient protein glycosilation):
deficient cell function; bad prognosis
DOWNREGULATION OF GCNT3 HIGH RISK OF RELAPSE
Different antitumoral
treatments increase GCNT3
(dose-dependent)
Effect no observed under cell
resistance
23. NATURAL COMPOUNDS
Clinical trials in specific
subgroups of patients
Phytochemicals
Basal structure for
drug development Plant extracts:
Therapeutic
complement
Molecular
targets:
ACSL/SCD
GCNT3
Validación y análisis
funcional
-In vitro
-In vivo (animal models)
ANTITUMORAL EFFECT (cancer subtype)
Non invasive biomarkers
of response (ie miRNAs)
(OMICS)
i
Combination with current treatments
Clinical trials
(healthy volunteers)
Screening (OMICS)
RE
Therapeutic
nutritional
intervention (Standarized composition)
24. Lipid metabolism Bioactive
compounds
RE: Rosemary Supercritical
Fluid Extracts (determined
composition, EFSA approval)
CARNOSIC ACID
CARNOSOL
*
*
* Display antitumoral properties
* Sensitizies chemoresistant cells to treatment
* Sinergizes with chemotherapy
In vivo tumor volume
RE
González-Vallinas et al. Nutrition and Cancer, 2015 Oct 9:1-9
González-Vallinas et al. PLoS One. 2014, 3;9(6):e98556.
González-Vallinas et al. Electrophoresis. 2014; 35(11):1719-27.
González-Vallinas et al. Pharmacological Research, 2013, 1;72C:61-68.
Vicente G et al. The Journal of Supercritical fluids, 2013, 79: 101–108.
FORCANCER:
Personalizednutritionforpreventionandtreatment ofpatientswithgastriccancer
ACSL/SCD; GCNT3
RE
Célula tumoral de
colon humano
(SW620)
1 mg/mL
(≈ 150 mg/kg/día)
H2O
+
RE
Adm.
oral
Ratón portador de
xenografía de
cáncer de colon
25. Lipid metabolism Bioactive
compounds
RE: Rosemary Supercritical
Fluid Extracts (determined
composition, EFSA approval)
CARNOSIC ACID
RE
miR-15b
González-Vallinas et al. Nutrition and Cancer, 2015 Oct 9:1-9
González-Vallinas et al. PLoS One. 2014, 3;9(6):e98556.
González-Vallinas et al. Electrophoresis. 2014; 35(11):1719-27.
González-Vallinas et al. Pharmacological Research, 2013, 1;72C:61-68.
Vicente G et al. The Journal of Supercritical fluids, 2013, 79: 101–108.
FORCANCER:
Personalizednutritionforpreventionandtreatment ofpatientswithgastriccancer
ACSL/SCD; GCNT3
dUMP TS dTMP dTTP
DNA synthesis
Timidina TK1
OMICS
CARNOSOL
Plasma
ACSL1/SCD: fatty acid activation
Invasion and migration
0 20 40 60 80 100
0.00.20.40.60.81.0
Grupo Inicial
Tiempo (meses)
Supervivenicalibredeenfermedad
P = 0.0006
Alta expresión de GCNT3
Baja expresión de GCNT3
Response to treatment
GCNT3
Colon cancer patients
↑GCNT3
↓GCNT3
* Display antitumoral properties
* Sensitizies chemoresistant cells to treatment
* Sinergizes with chemotherapy
26. Different formulations to increase bioavailability
* Clinical trial in healthy volunteers
Security, lipidic profile modulation, risk
factors (prevention), genetic profile
determining differential responses,
metabolic and biochemical biomarkers,
plasmatic miR15b
Development of RE bioactive nutritional supplements
• Study completed (80 volunteers)
• No sign of toxicity
• Currently: data analyis
27. *Clinical trial in colon cancer patients
CRC resectable patients (target population), ColoLipidGene / miRNA Biomarkers, GCNT3, clinico-
pathological characteristics, Synergism with chemotherapy (2 phase)
First Targeted nutritional supplement as
complementary therapeutic approach
(colon cancer)
• CEIC (FJD) approval: march 2016
• Trial: April – December 2016
Development of RE bioactive nutritional supplements
28. Lipid metabolism alterations might determine early-stage colon
cancer patients relapse
Supports metabolic drug repurposing
Supports nutritional-based targeted strategies as complementary
personalized therapeutic approaches for gastric cancer patients
Conclusion
OMICS: Molecular mechanism of disease ---- Molecular mechanism of treatments
29. Margarita González-Vallinas
Teodoro Vargas
Ruth Sánchez
Marta Gómez de Cedrón
Cristina Aguirre
Lara Fernández
Silvia Cruz
Jorge Martínez Romero
Ana Ramírez de Molina
Molecular Oncology Group
IMDEA Food Institute
Paloma Cejas
Marta Mendiola
Ana B Custodio
Emilio Burgos
Jaime Feliu
Hospital La Paz
Joan Maurel
Jorge Aracicio
Carlos Fernández-Martos
Ricardo Yaya
Hospital Clinic, Hospital La
Fe, IVO
http://www.alimentacion.imdea.org/oncologia-molecular
Isabel Espinosa
Elena Aguilar
Susana Molina
Mónica Gómez
Clara Ibáñez
Jesús Herranz
Viviana Loria
Plataforma GENYAL
Tiziana Fornari
Mónica García-Risco
Marta Corzo
Carlos Torres
Guillermo Reglero
CIAL (UAM-CSIC)
Ana Jiménez
César Gómez Raposo
Maria Sereno
Maria Merino
Juan Moreno
Enrique Casado
Hospital Infanta Sofía
Victor Moreno
Start Madrid
Mónica Álvarez
Mirna Pérez Moreno
Marcos Malumbres
Spanish National
Cancer Research Centre
Editor's Notes
Combined pharmacological treatment targeting the ACSL/SCD network synergy to selectively inhibit cancer cells viability and mesenchymal features
The robust protumor action of ACSL1/ACSL4/SCD network, together with the fact that all three of them are lipid metabolism enzymes, makes these druggable proteins attractive targets for cancer therapy. For this reason, we evaluated the effect on colon cancer cell viability of Triacsin C, a specific inhibitor of ACSL, and the SCD inhibitor A939572. Accordingly, both Triacsin C and A939572 were able to decrease cell viability in DLD-1 and SW620 cell lines in a dose- dependent manner.
Given that the use of high concentrations of pharmacological inhibitors may cause side effects and affect other pathways, we combined both compounds using lower doses that per se has little or no effect on the viability of a panel of colon cancer cell lines. Very importantly, the combined action of both inhibitors caused a strong cancer cell viability reduction even in the colon cell lines that do not easily respond to these compounds, such as HT-29 or LS174T.
We used as well a subclone of SW620 cells resistant to 5-Fluorouracil, the most used chemotherapeutic agent in colorectal cancer. The drugs had little (Triacsin C), or no effect (A939572) on SW620-5FU-R when applied separately. Nonetheless, a strong cooperative effect was found upon simultaneous treatment of chemotherapy resistant cells with ACSL and SCD inhibitors (Figure 5D).
Finally and very importantly, the same inhibitors concentrations that caused a massive loss of viability of colon cancer cell lines were totally ineffective when applied to normal colonocytes CCD18Co Thus, the targeting of ACSL1/ACSL4/SCD axis by means of the selective effect of these drugs on cancer cells arises as a promising therapeutic strategy.
El estudio de los compuestos naturales antitumorales puede dar lugar, por un lado a la identificación fitoquímicos tanto para su aplicación directa como para su utilización como estructuras que sirvan de base para el desarrollo de nuevos fármacos. Por otro lado, los extractos naturales se pueden como terapia complementaria en cáncer, y este uso puede ser eficaz en los pacientes, siempre que se establezcan adecuadamente las bases científicas que demuestren su utilidad en cada situación clínica concreta, determinada por el tipo de cáncer, el tratamiento antitumoral utilizado, y las alteraciones moleculares que presente el tumor.
Además, la identificación de las dianas moleculares de estos compuestos antitumorales puede servir para establecer nuevas dianas y biomarcadores con potencial utilidad en cáncer.