After the physical needs created by a disaster are met, how can Rotarians address psychological and spiritual needs? After a March 2011 earthquake and tsunami devastated Japan’s Tōhoku coast, U.S. Rotary clubs affected by the 9/11 terrorist attacks developed an innovative disaster response, creating strong bonds with local Rotarians and bringing healing to survivors in both regions. You’ll learn to think beyond the deployment of supplies and professionals and see the untapped potential of peer support in sustained disaster response.

1. 原子力損害：金銭賠償の限界
 生活再建のための金銭賠償による必要性あり
→しかし，それだけでは回復できない 「絶対損害」が発生
～予防原則の重要性
人間の尊厳（基本的人権）が侵害
 強制避難⇒関連死・認知症悪化・持病悪化・精神疾患など発生
 コミュニティから離れた高齢者へのサポート
 転々と転校 子どもへの影響 不登校など
 賠償を巡る家族、親族間の争い
 事業意欲・就労意欲の回復
→金銭賠償のみでは回復できない損害をどのように回復するか

2. NUCLEAR DAMAGE: THE LIMITATIONS OF COMPENSATION
 The need of compensation in order to rebuild their living
However, it cannot cover everything, and there is the “Irreversible Damage”
(damage that cannot be repaired only with monetary compensation)
~The importance of precautionary approach
The violation of human dignity (basic human rights)
 Forced refuge  Leading to “関連死” (=death not caused by direct damage from the
disaster, but by worsening of health and exhaustion caused by life as a refugee),
mental disorders, and the worsening of dementia and chronic diseases.
 Lack of support for the elderly who have been isolated from the community
 Effects on children who are forced to move schools numerous times, such as school
absenteeism
 Disputes between families and relatives over compensation
 Lack of recovery of desire of enterprises and work
Need to consider the way to repair damages that cannot be repaired by monetary
compensation

3. 金銭賠償やはり重要～車の両輪の一方として～
地方の一弁護士として伝えたいこと
 賠償の根拠法である原子力損害の賠償に関する法律（原賠法）
の問題点
 直接請求，東電の請求書式の問題点
 中間指針の問題点～特に，精神的慰謝料について
 賠償格差をめぐる分断 ⇒ 新たな損害
 線量の多寡による賠償枠組みの問題点 例）川内村
 賠償支払い拒絶⇒今後弁護士による闘いの本格化
 中間貯蔵施設による県民の分断
 社会の隅々に紛争の火種 ～平穏な生活侵害

4. THE IMPORTANCE OF MONETARY COMPENSATION
WHAT I WISH TO SAY AS AN COUNTRY ATTORNEY
 The problems of the law about compensation for nuclear damage (原賠法＝the Act on
Compensation for Nuclear Damage)
 The problems of the format of direct claim and claim of TEPCO (Tokyo Electric Power Company)
 The problems of the intermediary guiding principles (“東京電力株式会社福島第一、第二原子力発電
所事故による原子力損害の判定等に関する中間指針”=Intermediary (Mid) guiding principles on
decisions on nuclear damages caused by the nuclear power plants of TEPCO)
Especially about the moral or mental compensation (精神的慰謝料）
 The division of disparity of compensation
Leading to more damages
 The problems of the outline of compensation according to the amount of radiation dose (ex.
Kawauchimura)
 The refusal of payment of compensation
The full-scale battle for attorneys
 The division of the people caused by the interim storage facility
 Matters that can easily trigger conflicts everywhere in the society
~The violation of a peaceful life

5. 直接交渉・東電の請求書式の問題点
 あまりにも多い書式の種類・数の多さ（100種類以上はあると思う）
 典型的損害のみカバー 非典型の賠償なされず
 担当職員が決まっていない／担当職員により判断が異なる→不平等
 力の強い者・発言力が大きい者が多くの賠償を獲得→法の支配でない
 高齢者など書けず，東電職員が手伝い
マイナス面：東電が認めないと無理と誤認
プラス面：多数賠償処理における迅速さ
 請求団体の強さを背景とする賠償の不平等（農協・漁協など）
 弁護士でも難解 特に住居確保損害など
 東電：中間指針を上限枠であるとして，それ以外の賠償拒絶

6. THE PROBLEMS OF THE FORMAT OF DIRECT CLAIM AND
CLAIMS OF TEPCO
 There are too many types of formats (I believe that there are more than 100 types)
 Only covering typical damages, and not repairing the others
 There is no one who is in charge, and decisions defer between the staff in charge
Unfairness
 Those that have am influential voice and power receive greater compensation
Not under the control of law
 The elderly has problems writing them, and the staff of TEPCO helps them to do it
Con: The misunderstanding that it is only possible with the approval by TEPCO
Pro: Fast to encounter many compensations
 The unfairness of compensation caused by the power of the demanding organization
(ex. Agricultural cooperatives, fishery cooperatives)
 Difficult even for attorneys (ex. Damages on finding homes)
 TEPCO: Has the intermediate guiding principles as the maximum limit, refusing any
other compensations

7. 中間指針の問題点（例：精神的慰謝料）
平成２３年８月５日以後 ４次追補まで
 精神的慰謝料（生活費用増加分含む） 月額・定額・１人１０万円／月
算定根拠不明～自賠責基準？あまりに異なる状況，実態調査不十分
多数家族の場合 ｖｓ 独居の場合
就労不能損害受領 有 ｖｓ 無
町での消費生活 ｖｓ 辺地での相互扶助的生活
就労可能な若年層 ｖｓ 年金のみの高齢者
避難指示区域による大きな差
→ 難しい「線引き」問題
→ 不平等・賠償による「分断」「相互不信感」を助長
→ 賠償を巡る２次・３次被害の発生

8. PROBLEMS OF THE INTERMEDIATE GUIDING PRINCIPLES (EX.
MENTAL COMPENSATION)
 Mental (Moral) compensation (including the amount added for living costs) : fixed
amount of 100,000 yen (approx. US$823) per person, per month
Unknown basis of calculation ~Based on automobile liability?
Due to the situations being too different and the research being insufficient
Situations for:
-A family of many members VS Those who live alone
-The consuming life in town VS Life of mutual aid at remote areas of the country
-The young that are able to work VS The elderly that live with national pensions
The great disparity of compensation between regions of evacuation order
Difficulty of delineation, distinguishing
Promotion of division and mutual distrust due to unfair compensation
Secondary, Thirdly damages over compensation

9. 避難・賠償をめぐる人の分断 新たな被害
避難指示区域から
の避難者
滞在者
自主的避難者
福島では
安全に暮らせない
福島で暮らすことを選択
自宅には帰れない
賠償金は一定額
受領できる 賠償金は
制限される
賠償金は制限される

10. MORE DAMAGES AND DIVISION OVER EVACUATION AND COMPENSATION
Limited compensation
Decided to stay and live
in Fukushima
SOJOURNER
Can’t go home
Can’t live in Fukushima
safely
VOLUNTARY
EVACUEESLimited compensation
EVACUEES OF
EVACUATION ORDER
REGIONS
Receives set
amount of
compensation

11. 原発賠償の格差
【設定】
• 世帯人数 ４人 （夫婦と子ども二人）
• 夫（３０代）は会社員，妻は専業主婦
年収＝２６５万９０００円（３０代の平均）
• 夫の持ち家
昭和５０年築（築３６年）
敷地面積４１０．０３㎡（福島県平均）
延べ床面積１４７．５４㎡（福島県平均）

12. DISPARITY OF COMPENSATION OF THE NUCLEAR
DISASTER 【Setting】
• Household of 4 people （Couple and 2 children）
• The husband (in his 30s) is a company officer, the
wife a full-time housewife
Yearly income: 2659000 YEN (approx. US$21,872)
(average as couple in their 30s)
• House of husband
Build in 1974 (36 years since then)
Site area: ４１０．０３㎡（average in Fukushima pref.)
Total floor area: １４７．５４㎡（average in Fukushima
pref.）

13. 原発賠償の格差（東電基準）
旧緊急時避難準備区域 旧警戒区域
精神的損害 １８０万円×４人 ４８０万円以上×４人
中学生以下または
高校生の子ども
３５万円×２人
家屋 ０円 ８３７万円以上
（別に「住居確保損害」が認めら
れる可能性）
家財 ０円 ５０５万円
合計 ３２６２万円
４倍以上の差
７９０万円

14. DISPARITY OF COMPENSATION OF NUCLEAR DISASTER
(STANDARDS OF TEPCO)
FORMER EVACUATION-PREPARED
AREAS IN CASE OF EMERGENCY
FORMER IN CASE OF
EMERGENCY AREAS
MENTAL
COMPENSATION
1,800,000 YEN × 2 PEOPLE OVER 4,800,000 YEN
× 2 PEOPLE
CHILD BELOW AGE OF
SECONDARY SCHOOL OR
CHILD IN HIGH SCHOOL
35,0000 YEN × 2 PEOPLE
HOUSE TAX ０ YEN OVER 8,370,000 YEN
(“DAMAGES OF FINDING
HOMES” MAY BE
APPROVED”
FAMILY FORTUNE ０ YEN 5,050,000 YEN
TOTAL OVER 32,620,000 YEN
OVER 4 TIMES DIFFERENCE
7,900,000 YEN

15. 原発賠償の格差
【設定】
• 世帯人数 ２人 （夫婦）
• 夫婦（７０代）の年金収入
• 夫の持ち家
昭和５０年築（築３６年）
敷地面積４１０．０３㎡（福島県平均）
延べ床面積１４７．５４㎡（福島県平均）

16. DISPARITY OF COMPENSATION FOR THE NUCLEAR
DISASTER
【Setting】
• Household of 2 people （Couple）
• Couple (both in their 70s) live by pension
incomes
• House of the husband
Build in 1974 (36 years since then)
Site area :４１０．０３㎡（average in Fukushima
pref.）
Total floor area: １４７．５４㎡（average in
Fukushima pref.）

17. 原発賠償の格差（東電基準）
旧緊急時避難準備区域 旧警戒区域
精神的損害 １８０万円×２人 ４８０万円以上×２人
就労不能損害 ０円 ０円
家屋 ０円 ８３７万円以上
（別に「住居確保損害」が認めら
れる可能性）
家財 ０円 ５０５万円
合計 ２３０２万円以上
６倍以上の差
３６０万円

18. DISPARITY OF COMPENSATION OF NUCLEAR DISASTER
(STANDARDS OF TEPCO)
FORMER EVACUATION-PREPARED
AREAS IN CASE OF EMERGENCY
FORMER IN CASE OF
EMERGENCY AREAS
MENTAL
COMPENSATION
1,800,000 YEN × 2 PEOPLE OVER 4,800,000 YEN
× 2 PEOPLE
INVALIDITY
DAMAGES
０ YEN ０ YEN
HOUSE TAX ０ YEN OVER 8,370,000 YEN
(“DAMAGES OF FINDING
HOMES” MAY BE
APPROVED”
FAMILY FORTUNE ０ YEN 5,050,000 YEN
TOTAL OVER 23,020,000 YEN
OVER 6 TIMES
DIFFERENCE
3,600,000 YEN

19. 現在の賠償総額 約4兆7,472億円→東電・政府「終期」設定
2015年3月13日現在（東京電力ＨＰより引用）
個人
個人（自主的
避難等に係る損害）
法人・
個人事業主など
ご請求について
ご請求書受付件数
（延べ件数）
約728,000件 約1,303,000件 約316,000件
本賠償の状況について
本賠償の件数
（延べ件数）
約649,000件 約1,290,000件 約274,000件
本賠償の金額 約2兆1,076億円 約3,532億円 約2兆1,352億円
これまでのお支払い金額について
本賠償の金額 約4兆5,960億円 ①
仮払補償金 約1,511億円 ②
お支払い総額 約4兆7,472億円 ①＋②
弁護士として
の闘いの本番

20. CURRENT SUM TOTAL OF COMPENSATION APPROX. 4,747,200,000,000 YEN
(APPROX. US$39,049,400,000) BY TEPCO AND GOV. “END” SETTING
OF 13TH OF MARCH, 2015（FROM THE HOMEPAGE OF TEPCO）
INDIVIDUAL
INDIVIDUAL (DAMAGES
ASSOCIATED TO
VOLUNTARY
EVACUATION)
FOUNDATIONS,
ONE-MAN
BUSINESS
ABOUT CLAIMS
NO. ACCEPTED BILLS 728,000 1,303,000 316,000
SITUATION OF THIS COMPENSATION
NO. OF THIS COMPENSATION 649,000 1,290,000 274,000
SUM OF THIS COMPENSATION 2,107,600,000,000 353,200,000,000 2,135,200,000,000
ABOUT THE SUM OF PAYMENT
PRICE OF THIS
COMPENSATION 4,596,000,000,000 YEN ①
TEMPORARILY PAYED
COMPENSATION 151,100,000,000 YEN ②
SUM OF PAYMENT 4,747,200,000,000 YEN ①＋②
WHOLE-SCALE
BATTLE FOR
ATTORNEYS

21. 原発賠償に関する現状～和解案拒否
浪江町住民ＡＤＲ集団申立てに対する和解案
（H26.3）
 避難生活の長期化に伴う精神的苦痛の増大 月
5万円（H24.3～H26.2）
 75歳以上の高齢者 月3万円（H23.3.11～）
飯舘村蕨平地区住民ＡＤＲ集団申立てに対する和
解案（H26.3）
 妊婦・子ども 1人100万円
 それ以外の者 1人50万円
← 蕨平地区に留まり続けたことによる放射線被ばく
への恐怖・不安
東京電力はいずれの和解案も拒否

22. SITUATION OF THE COMPENSATION OF THE NUCLEAR DISASTER
– REFUSAL OF SETTLEMENT
Settlement against the declaration by the ADR organization of
the local residents of Namie town. (March, 2014)
 The increase of mental pain caused by a long-term life in
evacuation shelters : 50,000 YEN per month (approx.
US$411) (March of 2012 ~ February of 2014)
 Elderly aged over 75 30,000 YEN (approx. US$247) per
month (11th of March, 2011~)
Settlement against declaration by the ADR organization of the
local residents of Warabidaira district, Iitate village (March,
2014)
 Pregnant women, children 1000,000 YEN (approx.
US$8226) per person
Others: 500,000 YEN (approx. US$4113) per person
← Fear and anxiety against being exposed to radiation due to
staying in Warabidaira district for a long period of time
TEPCO REFUSED BOTH
SETTLEMENTS
Concept of the region of evacuation orders
As of 1st of December, 2014

23. 中間貯蔵施設の建設
環境影響評価（環境アセス）なし
地権者の行方不明
（特定できた地権者２３６５名のうち通知発
送は１２６９名）
補償金額の算定方法
（原発事故前の時価の５割？）

24. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE INTERIM STORAGE FACILITY
No environmental impact
assessment (Environment
assessment)
Leaseholders missing
(Out of 2365 identified leaseholders,
there were only 1269 notices sent)
The method of calculation of the
sum of compensation
(50% of the current price before the
nuclear disaster?)

25. 中間貯蔵施設 さらに分断
地権者
周辺住民
• 「どうせ使えない土地なら高く買い取って」
• 「先祖伝来の土地，30年後には返して」
• 「返してもらったとき，そこに住めるのか？」
「今のままの説明では，納得がいかない」
• 「道路を挟んで向かい側は買い取ってくれるのに，
自分たちには何も補償がない」
• 「除染廃棄物の近くで生活しなければいけないの
か？安全なのか？」
「自分たちの意見は何も聞いてくれない」
周辺自治体
• 「除染廃棄物の行き場が決まらなければ復興計
画も進まない」
• 「中間貯蔵施設への搬入通路になる。安全対策
は？風評被害は？交通渋滞は？」

26. INTERIM STORAGE FACILITY
FURTHER DIVISION
LEASEHOLDER
LOCAL
RESIDENTS
• “It’s an useless land anyway, why not buy it for a better
price?”
• “It’s an ancestral land of history, so give it back to me in
30 years.”
• ‘Can I live there after my land is returned?”
I am unhappy with the explanation given as of now
• “Those on the other side of the road would buy it,
but nothing’s guaranteed to us.”
• “Must we live by the decontamination waste? Is
that even safe?”
“They wouldn't’t even listen to what we
have to say
LOCAL GOVERNMENT
• “If there’s no plans to where the decontamination
waste goes, the reconstruction plan can’t make its
start.”
• “It will become the import pathway to the interim
storage facility. What about the safety measures? Or
reputational risks? Or traffic jams?”

27. 原発事故＝社会の隅々に紛争の火種
 賠償金をめぐる家族間紛争／労使関係の悪化
 賠償をめぐる成年後見事件の増加
 賠償金をめぐる遺産分割事件の増加
 避難に伴う離婚事件の増加
 避難先での不動産トラブルの発生
 除染作業員等による刑事事件
 除染作業などをめぐるトラブル
 避難者と受入側の軋轢（医療・交通の混在，土地の値上がりなど）
→平穏な生活環境の悪化，共存可能？ 世代間倫理

28. NUCLEAR ACCIDENT
=MATTERS THAN CAN EASILY TRIGGER CONFLICTS EVERYWHERE IN
THE SOCIETY
 Conflicts between families, worsening of industrial relations over compensation
 Increase of cases of adult guardianship over compensation
 Increase of cases of partition of inheritance over compensation
 Increase of divorce cases that came along with evacuation
 The occurrence of problems of real estates at place of refuge
 Criminal cases by those such as decontaminators
 Trouble over decontamination
 Conflict between refugees and the hosting side
(When refugees come to evacuate, they are often given privileges/special conditions that were not given for the people who
had been living there before the refugees, such as free access to highways and better services for medical treatment. This
happens for land value as well. The land which refugees gather at becomes populated, resulting in the increase of land
prices, which is another disadvantage for residents who had been there from before. On the other hand, land value of lands
that are vacant due to the evacuation of the people decrease.
As a country that deeply values equity between the people, these disparities cause conflicts, or cause the refugees to feel
uncomfortable in the new environment.)
Damaging peaceful living environments
Is it possible to live together?