SlideShare a Scribd company logo
By: Shreya, Isabelle, and Vinay
“In suits at common law, where the value in
controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of
trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a
jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any court of
the United States, than according to the rules of the
common law.”

Meaning- In any civil case, if the amount of money
involved exceeds $20, the citizen in the case has the
right to trial by jury, and once this case is decided,
the facts will never be looked at unless common law
says so.

Today, $20 is a small amount of money so $1,500 is the
amount needed today.
 protects   the public from aristocratic
  judges
 Secures the line between the judge and
  the jury-limits the judges power by
  dividing it with the jury
 colonists’ way to protects themselves from
  unjust laws
 Way of deciding someone’s verdict in a fair
  way
 Trial by jury began in England-12th
  century
 English judges were “lions under the
  throne”
 Judges did not make fair decisions
Founding Fathers involved this amendment
in the bill of rights to protect the public
from corrupt judges.
1. Case must invoke a claim that would be reasonable to
   have a trial by jury.
2. The lawsuit must be brought in federal courts, not
   state courts.
3. The lawsuit must be for a claim of more than $20.
4. The legal case must assert a claim that is legal in
nature rather than an equity or in an admiralty cases.

Legal- cases where money is sought by the accuser from
the defendant.
Admirably- cases regarding something that happened at
sea
Equity-case involving disputes with no money ex.
divorce, custody
 Beacon    Theatres v. Westover
-In this case, legal and equitable claims were “together
  in action”, and the Supreme Court decided Legal
  Claim must be decided in front of a jury before the
  equitable claim is tried.


Some federal courts think there is an exception to
  the right to trial by jury in complex cases. The
  argument is that a jury made up of common
  people is not qualified to rule complex cases and
  the judge decide. Others argue that taking away
  juries would take away power from the people.
WAY TO REMEMBER
There are 27 amendment and the 7th one
           involves 20 dollars
 http://www.revolutionary-war-and-
  beyond.com/7th-amendment.html
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seventh_
  Amendment_to_the_United_States_Cons
  titution
 http://www.proprofs.com/flashcards/ca
  rdshowall.php?title=amendments_30
 http://score.rims.k12.ca.us/score_lesso
  ns/bill_of_rights/media/seven.htm
 http://legal-
  dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Sevent
  h+Amendment

More Related Content

What's hot

Memory Forensics
Memory ForensicsMemory Forensics
Memory Forensics
Anshul Tayal
 
Jerry Banks Criminal Complaint
Jerry Banks Criminal ComplaintJerry Banks Criminal Complaint
Jerry Banks Criminal Complaint
Hindenburg Research
 
Judicial Branch Intro
Judicial Branch IntroJudicial Branch Intro
Judicial Branch IntroMelissa
 
Bill of Rights
Bill of RightsBill of Rights
Bill of Rights
JimmyJackson182
 
Online freedom of expression
Online freedom of expressionOnline freedom of expression
Online freedom of expression
Centre for Media Pluralism and Media Freedom
 
Digital court and benefits
Digital court and benefitsDigital court and benefits
Digital court and benefits
Mahim121
 
Issues in Family Law
Issues in Family Law Issues in Family Law
Issues in Family Law Mr Shipp
 

What's hot (8)

Memory Forensics
Memory ForensicsMemory Forensics
Memory Forensics
 
Jerry Banks Criminal Complaint
Jerry Banks Criminal ComplaintJerry Banks Criminal Complaint
Jerry Banks Criminal Complaint
 
Judicial Branch Intro
Judicial Branch IntroJudicial Branch Intro
Judicial Branch Intro
 
Bill of Rights
Bill of RightsBill of Rights
Bill of Rights
 
Online freedom of expression
Online freedom of expressionOnline freedom of expression
Online freedom of expression
 
Fourth Amendment notes
Fourth Amendment notesFourth Amendment notes
Fourth Amendment notes
 
Digital court and benefits
Digital court and benefitsDigital court and benefits
Digital court and benefits
 
Issues in Family Law
Issues in Family Law Issues in Family Law
Issues in Family Law
 

Similar to Amendment 7

Subject Matter Jurisdiction (Diversity), Civil Procedure, UNH Law (September ...
Subject Matter Jurisdiction (Diversity), Civil Procedure, UNH Law (September ...Subject Matter Jurisdiction (Diversity), Civil Procedure, UNH Law (September ...
Subject Matter Jurisdiction (Diversity), Civil Procedure, UNH Law (September ...
Kevin O'Shea
 
Gov.uscourts.nyed.427196.51.0
Gov.uscourts.nyed.427196.51.0Gov.uscourts.nyed.427196.51.0
Gov.uscourts.nyed.427196.51.0
Daniel Alouidor
 
Class 1 the nature-of_law[1]
Class 1   the nature-of_law[1]Class 1   the nature-of_law[1]
Class 1 the nature-of_law[1]rjoannie
 
sTORMING THE cOURRT PAPER
sTORMING THE cOURRT PAPERsTORMING THE cOURRT PAPER
sTORMING THE cOURRT PAPERRasan Cherala
 
Equity - development and maxims
Equity - development and maximsEquity - development and maxims
Equity - development and maxims
Abhijith S R
 
Black Hills Indian History
Black Hills Indian HistoryBlack Hills Indian History
Black Hills Indian History
Michelle Madero
 
Maxims of equity
Maxims of equityMaxims of equity
Maxims of equity
Maniyali Abdul Rahim
 
Cases that changed the conduct of business
Cases that changed the conduct of businessCases that changed the conduct of business
Cases that changed the conduct of businessCheapestPapers
 
Product liability, litigations in india and class
Product liability, litigations in india and classProduct liability, litigations in india and class
Product liability, litigations in india and classNishank Reddy H
 
Equity
EquityEquity
Chapter 2 - The Resolution of Private Disputes
Chapter 2 - The Resolution of Private DisputesChapter 2 - The Resolution of Private Disputes
Chapter 2 - The Resolution of Private DisputesPacific University, Oregon
 
Chapter 2 – The Resolution of Private Disputes
Chapter 2 – The Resolution of Private DisputesChapter 2 – The Resolution of Private Disputes
Chapter 2 – The Resolution of Private Disputes
UAF_BA330
 
Kiobel: Major U.S. Jurisdictional Limitation for Overseas Actions
Kiobel: Major U.S. Jurisdictional Limitation for Overseas ActionsKiobel: Major U.S. Jurisdictional Limitation for Overseas Actions
Kiobel: Major U.S. Jurisdictional Limitation for Overseas ActionsPatton Boggs LLP
 
Chapter 2 Presentation
Chapter 2 PresentationChapter 2 Presentation
Chapter 2 PresentationRoland Cyr
 
Chapter 2 Presentation
Chapter 2 PresentationChapter 2 Presentation
Chapter 2 Presentationguest2495ca5
 
Stare decisis
Stare decisisStare decisis
Stare decisis
dimaro816
 

Similar to Amendment 7 (18)

Subject Matter Jurisdiction (Diversity), Civil Procedure, UNH Law (September ...
Subject Matter Jurisdiction (Diversity), Civil Procedure, UNH Law (September ...Subject Matter Jurisdiction (Diversity), Civil Procedure, UNH Law (September ...
Subject Matter Jurisdiction (Diversity), Civil Procedure, UNH Law (September ...
 
Gov.uscourts.nyed.427196.51.0
Gov.uscourts.nyed.427196.51.0Gov.uscourts.nyed.427196.51.0
Gov.uscourts.nyed.427196.51.0
 
Class 1 the nature-of_law[1]
Class 1   the nature-of_law[1]Class 1   the nature-of_law[1]
Class 1 the nature-of_law[1]
 
sTORMING THE cOURRT PAPER
sTORMING THE cOURRT PAPERsTORMING THE cOURRT PAPER
sTORMING THE cOURRT PAPER
 
Equity - development and maxims
Equity - development and maximsEquity - development and maxims
Equity - development and maxims
 
The Federal Court System
The Federal Court SystemThe Federal Court System
The Federal Court System
 
Black Hills Indian History
Black Hills Indian HistoryBlack Hills Indian History
Black Hills Indian History
 
Maxims of equity
Maxims of equityMaxims of equity
Maxims of equity
 
Cases that changed the conduct of business
Cases that changed the conduct of businessCases that changed the conduct of business
Cases that changed the conduct of business
 
Product liability, litigations in india and class
Product liability, litigations in india and classProduct liability, litigations in india and class
Product liability, litigations in india and class
 
Equity
EquityEquity
Equity
 
Chapter 2 - The Resolution of Private Disputes
Chapter 2 - The Resolution of Private DisputesChapter 2 - The Resolution of Private Disputes
Chapter 2 - The Resolution of Private Disputes
 
Chapter 2 – The Resolution of Private Disputes
Chapter 2 – The Resolution of Private DisputesChapter 2 – The Resolution of Private Disputes
Chapter 2 – The Resolution of Private Disputes
 
Kiobel: Major U.S. Jurisdictional Limitation for Overseas Actions
Kiobel: Major U.S. Jurisdictional Limitation for Overseas ActionsKiobel: Major U.S. Jurisdictional Limitation for Overseas Actions
Kiobel: Major U.S. Jurisdictional Limitation for Overseas Actions
 
Chapter 2 Presentation
Chapter 2 PresentationChapter 2 Presentation
Chapter 2 Presentation
 
Chapter 2 Presentation
Chapter 2 PresentationChapter 2 Presentation
Chapter 2 Presentation
 
US Judicial System Report
US Judicial System ReportUS Judicial System Report
US Judicial System Report
 
Stare decisis
Stare decisisStare decisis
Stare decisis
 

Amendment 7

  • 2. “In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.” Meaning- In any civil case, if the amount of money involved exceeds $20, the citizen in the case has the right to trial by jury, and once this case is decided, the facts will never be looked at unless common law says so. Today, $20 is a small amount of money so $1,500 is the amount needed today.
  • 3.  protects the public from aristocratic judges  Secures the line between the judge and the jury-limits the judges power by dividing it with the jury  colonists’ way to protects themselves from unjust laws  Way of deciding someone’s verdict in a fair way
  • 4.  Trial by jury began in England-12th century  English judges were “lions under the throne”  Judges did not make fair decisions Founding Fathers involved this amendment in the bill of rights to protect the public from corrupt judges.
  • 5. 1. Case must invoke a claim that would be reasonable to have a trial by jury. 2. The lawsuit must be brought in federal courts, not state courts. 3. The lawsuit must be for a claim of more than $20. 4. The legal case must assert a claim that is legal in nature rather than an equity or in an admiralty cases. Legal- cases where money is sought by the accuser from the defendant. Admirably- cases regarding something that happened at sea Equity-case involving disputes with no money ex. divorce, custody
  • 6.  Beacon Theatres v. Westover -In this case, legal and equitable claims were “together in action”, and the Supreme Court decided Legal Claim must be decided in front of a jury before the equitable claim is tried. Some federal courts think there is an exception to the right to trial by jury in complex cases. The argument is that a jury made up of common people is not qualified to rule complex cases and the judge decide. Others argue that taking away juries would take away power from the people.
  • 7. WAY TO REMEMBER There are 27 amendment and the 7th one involves 20 dollars
  • 8.  http://www.revolutionary-war-and- beyond.com/7th-amendment.html  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seventh_ Amendment_to_the_United_States_Cons titution  http://www.proprofs.com/flashcards/ca rdshowall.php?title=amendments_30  http://score.rims.k12.ca.us/score_lesso ns/bill_of_rights/media/seven.htm  http://legal- dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Sevent h+Amendment