The European Court of Human Rights decided on nine applications jointly in a single decision. It notes that friendly settlements were reached between the applicants and Russia. Under the settlements, the applicants agreed to waive further claims against Russia regarding the facts of the applications in exchange for monetary payments as detailed in an appended table. The Court found the settlements respected human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols and saw no reason to continue examining the applications. It therefore decided to strike the applications from its list of cases.
Генпрокурор Юрій Луценко і його заступник, військовий прокурор Анатолій Матіос використовують свої повноваження для політичних переслідувань, зловживають службовим становищем і причетні до тиску і тортур затриманих в рамках так званої «справи податківців».
Про це в своєму листі, адресованому Верховному представнику ЄС із закордонних справ і політики безпеки Федеріці Могеріні і членам Комітету постійних представників Ради ЄС (Coreper), написав лідер партії «Успішна країна» Олександр Клименко.
http://oleksandr-klymenko.com/newsroom/news/8739-klimenko-rasskazal-evrochinovnikam-o-zloupotrebleniyah-vlastyu-lutsenko-i-matiosa/
Генпрокурор Юрій Луценко і його заступник, військовий прокурор Анатолій Матіос використовують свої повноваження для політичних переслідувань, зловживають службовим становищем і причетні до тиску і тортур затриманих в рамках так званої «справи податківців».
Про це в своєму листі, адресованому Верховному представнику ЄС із закордонних справ і політики безпеки Федеріці Могеріні і членам Комітету постійних представників Ради ЄС (Coreper), написав лідер партії «Успішна країна» Олександр Клименко.
http://oleksandr-klymenko.com/newsroom/news/8739-klimenko-rasskazal-evrochinovnikam-o-zloupotrebleniyah-vlastyu-lutsenko-i-matiosa/
Final status of RTI dated 15.06.2017 updated on 19.06.2017Om Prakash Poddar
Supreme Court of India not listing the matter before Hon'ble Judges since 20.02.2017.
THE MATTER IS A CERTIORARI CASE OF SDJM BEGUSARAI FOR 14 YEAR ILLEGAL CONFINEMENT OF INDIAN SENIOR CITIZEN WOMEN WITH AN ATTACHMENT OF HER LIFE TIME ACQUIRED PROPERTY.
Answer of Deputy Prosecutor General - Head of the Specialized Anti-corruption...NABU Leaks
Answer of Deputy Prosecutor General - Head of the Specialized Anti-corruption Prosecutor's Office Nazar Kholodnitskii under Statement of Criminal Offenses Committed by Officials of the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine (translation)
Public Opinion Poll on citizens' view on constitutional reform, commissioned in July 2013 within the project “Constitutional Reform in Bosnia and Herzegovina: Engaging Civil Society"
Is the parallel competence set out in regulation 12003 totally clear. case co...Michal
With a motion dated 28th of April 2005 submitted to the President of the Office of
Competition and Consumer Protection (in Polish: Prezes Urzędu Ochrony Konkurencji
i Konsumentów; hereafter, UOKiK President), Tele2 Polska Sp. z o.o. (currently:
Netia S.A., hereafter, Applicant) requested the initiation of antitrust proceedings
against Telekomunikacja Polska S.A. (hereafter, TP). The Polish incumbent, TP, was
alleged to have engaged in practices restricting competition covered by Article 8(1)
and 8(2)(5) of the Act on Competition and Consumer Protection of 15th December
2000 (hereafter, Competition Act 2000) and in Article 82 of the Treaty establishing
European Community (hereafter, TEC), presently, Article 102 of the Treaty on the
functioning of the European Union (hereafter, TFEU).
Letter in response to the Upper Tribunals Notice of Determination of Application for Permission to Appeal to the Upper Tribunal. Concerns requests for information made to Humberside police to obtain the number of times the phrase "YOU CANT MAKE ME" appeared in police officers witness statements. Humberside Police relied on section 14(1) (vexatious requests) of FOIA.
Final status of RTI dated 15.06.2017 updated on 19.06.2017Om Prakash Poddar
Supreme Court of India not listing the matter before Hon'ble Judges since 20.02.2017.
THE MATTER IS A CERTIORARI CASE OF SDJM BEGUSARAI FOR 14 YEAR ILLEGAL CONFINEMENT OF INDIAN SENIOR CITIZEN WOMEN WITH AN ATTACHMENT OF HER LIFE TIME ACQUIRED PROPERTY.
Answer of Deputy Prosecutor General - Head of the Specialized Anti-corruption...NABU Leaks
Answer of Deputy Prosecutor General - Head of the Specialized Anti-corruption Prosecutor's Office Nazar Kholodnitskii under Statement of Criminal Offenses Committed by Officials of the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine (translation)
Public Opinion Poll on citizens' view on constitutional reform, commissioned in July 2013 within the project “Constitutional Reform in Bosnia and Herzegovina: Engaging Civil Society"
Is the parallel competence set out in regulation 12003 totally clear. case co...Michal
With a motion dated 28th of April 2005 submitted to the President of the Office of
Competition and Consumer Protection (in Polish: Prezes Urzędu Ochrony Konkurencji
i Konsumentów; hereafter, UOKiK President), Tele2 Polska Sp. z o.o. (currently:
Netia S.A., hereafter, Applicant) requested the initiation of antitrust proceedings
against Telekomunikacja Polska S.A. (hereafter, TP). The Polish incumbent, TP, was
alleged to have engaged in practices restricting competition covered by Article 8(1)
and 8(2)(5) of the Act on Competition and Consumer Protection of 15th December
2000 (hereafter, Competition Act 2000) and in Article 82 of the Treaty establishing
European Community (hereafter, TEC), presently, Article 102 of the Treaty on the
functioning of the European Union (hereafter, TFEU).
Letter in response to the Upper Tribunals Notice of Determination of Application for Permission to Appeal to the Upper Tribunal. Concerns requests for information made to Humberside police to obtain the number of times the phrase "YOU CANT MAKE ME" appeared in police officers witness statements. Humberside Police relied on section 14(1) (vexatious requests) of FOIA.
NaturaLyte and GranuFlo lawsuits in federal court have been consolidated into multidistrict litigation in federal court in Massachusetts. These lawsuits all claim money from the maker of GranuFlo and NaturaLyte, Fresenius Medical Care. NaturaLyte and GranuFlo were drugs used in the process of kidney dialysis. The FDA issued a Class I recall, its most serious, after it was discovered that NaturaLyte and GranuFlo could cause cardiac problems, including heart attacks and sudden death.
NaturaLyte and GranuFlo were recalled March 29, 2012. A copy of the FDA Recall Notice can be found among the documents uploaded by Michael J. Evans here on SlideShare.
Because the two dialysis drugs were presumably not used after March 29, 2013, there is some reason to believe that most, if not all, NaturaLyte and GranuFlo lawsuits could have been filed by March 30, 2012. Therefore, in states which have a two-year statute of limitations, there is an argument that the statute of limitations would run on a NaturaLyte or GranuFlo lawsuit no later than March 29, 2014. Of course, there are some states with longer statutes of limitation, and there are legal arguments, such as tolling, that may allow some people to file NaturaLyte and GranuFlo lawsuits after March 29, 2014.
It seems risky to this lawyer to wait to file a NaturaLyte or GranuFlo lawsuit. On July 29, 2013, the MDL judge entered this order setting a scheduling conference for August 30, 2013. One part of the Order that should be of particular interest to people with NaturaLyte or GranuFlo claims is this: the judge ordered all plaintiffs' attorneys to provide settlement proposals to the defendants' lawyers no later than two weeks prior to the hearing. That deadline ran on August 16, 2013. The lawyers for Fresenius Medical Care are ordered to respond to the proposals at the August 30 hearing.
If you were seriously injured by dialysis, or lost a family member due to dialysis, before the NaturaLyte and GranuFlo recall on March 29, 2013, you should have already had your possible lawsuit reviewed by a law firm which is experienced in representing injured people in pharmaceutical and medical device lawsuits. If you or your loved one experienced serious cardiac problems, including a heart attack or sudden death during or after dialysis while NaturaLyte and GranuFlo were still on the market, you may have a valuable claim for money but be unaware of it. You probably wouldn't be told by Fresenius that you or your family member were injured (or died) due to NaturaLyte or GranuFlo. You may wish to contact a law firm which is willing to spend the money to get copies of the medical records (at no cost to you) to see if NaturaLyte or GranuFlo were used. I am part of a group of law firms that handles such cases, and we would be glad to investigate your possible case of cardiac problems or death due to dialysis. If we don't collect money FOR you, we don't collect and money FROM you. It's a risk-free opportunity.
LA FIGURA DEL DIFENSORE NEL PROCESSO DAVANTI AL TASGilberto Cavagna
Ingtervento nell’ambito del seminario di studi sul rapporto fra le Olimpiadi e
il Tribunale Arbitrale dello Sport di Losanna in occasione
della presentazione del progetto Milano - Cortina 2026
RIGHTS OF VICTIM EDITED PRESENTATION(SAIF JAVED).pptxOmGod1
Victims of crime have a range of rights designed to ensure their protection, support, and participation in the justice system. These rights include the right to be treated with dignity and respect, the right to be informed about the progress of their case, and the right to be heard during legal proceedings. Victims are entitled to protection from intimidation and harm, access to support services such as counseling and medical care, and the right to restitution from the offender. Additionally, many jurisdictions provide victims with the right to participate in parole hearings and the right to privacy to protect their personal information from public disclosure. These rights aim to acknowledge the impact of crime on victims and to provide them with the necessary resources and involvement in the judicial process.
ASHWINI KUMAR UPADHYAY v/s Union of India.pptxshweeta209
transfer of the P.I.L filed by lawyer Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay in Delhi High Court to Supreme Court.
on the issue of UNIFORM MARRIAGE AGE of men and women.
Military Commissions details LtCol Thomas Jasper as Detailed Defense CounselThomas (Tom) Jasper
Military Commissions Trial Judiciary, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Notice of the Chief Defense Counsel's detailing of LtCol Thomas F. Jasper, Jr. USMC, as Detailed Defense Counsel for Abd Al Hadi Al-Iraqi on 6 August 2014 in the case of United States v. Hadi al Iraqi (10026)
In 2020, the Ministry of Home Affairs established a committee led by Prof. (Dr.) Ranbir Singh, former Vice Chancellor of National Law University (NLU), Delhi. This committee was tasked with reviewing the three codes of criminal law. The primary objective of the committee was to propose comprehensive reforms to the country’s criminal laws in a manner that is both principled and effective.
The committee’s focus was on ensuring the safety and security of individuals, communities, and the nation as a whole. Throughout its deliberations, the committee aimed to uphold constitutional values such as justice, dignity, and the intrinsic value of each individual. Their goal was to recommend amendments to the criminal laws that align with these values and priorities.
Subsequently, in February, the committee successfully submitted its recommendations regarding amendments to the criminal law. These recommendations are intended to serve as a foundation for enhancing the current legal framework, promoting safety and security, and upholding the constitutional principles of justice, dignity, and the inherent worth of every individual.
DNA Testing in Civil and Criminal Matters.pptxpatrons legal
Get insights into DNA testing and its application in civil and criminal matters. Find out how it contributes to fair and accurate legal proceedings. For more information: https://www.patronslegal.com/criminal-litigation.html
How to Obtain Permanent Residency in the NetherlandsBridgeWest.eu
You can rely on our assistance if you are ready to apply for permanent residency. Find out more at: https://immigration-netherlands.com/obtain-a-permanent-residence-permit-in-the-netherlands/.
WINDING UP of COMPANY, Modes of DissolutionKHURRAMWALI
Winding up, also known as liquidation, refers to the legal and financial process of dissolving a company. It involves ceasing operations, selling assets, settling debts, and ultimately removing the company from the official business registry.
Here's a breakdown of the key aspects of winding up:
Reasons for Winding Up:
Insolvency: This is the most common reason, where the company cannot pay its debts. Creditors may initiate a compulsory winding up to recover their dues.
Voluntary Closure: The owners may decide to close the company due to reasons like reaching business goals, facing losses, or merging with another company.
Deadlock: If shareholders or directors cannot agree on how to run the company, a court may order a winding up.
Types of Winding Up:
Voluntary Winding Up: This is initiated by the company's shareholders through a resolution passed by a majority vote. There are two main types:
Members' Voluntary Winding Up: The company is solvent (has enough assets to pay off its debts) and shareholders will receive any remaining assets after debts are settled.
Creditors' Voluntary Winding Up: The company is insolvent and creditors will be prioritized in receiving payment from the sale of assets.
Compulsory Winding Up: This is initiated by a court order, typically at the request of creditors, government agencies, or even by the company itself if it's insolvent.
Process of Winding Up:
Appointment of Liquidator: A qualified professional is appointed to oversee the winding-up process. They are responsible for selling assets, paying off debts, and distributing any remaining funds.
Cease Trading: The company stops its regular business operations.
Notification of Creditors: Creditors are informed about the winding up and invited to submit their claims.
Sale of Assets: The company's assets are sold to generate cash to pay off creditors.
Payment of Debts: Creditors are paid according to a set order of priority, with secured creditors receiving payment before unsecured creditors.
Distribution to Shareholders: If there are any remaining funds after all debts are settled, they are distributed to shareholders according to their ownership stake.
Dissolution: Once all claims are settled and distributions made, the company is officially dissolved and removed from the business register.
Impact of Winding Up:
Employees: Employees will likely lose their jobs during the winding-up process.
Creditors: Creditors may not recover their debts in full, especially if the company is insolvent.
Shareholders: Shareholders may not receive any payout if the company's debts exceed its assets.
Winding up is a complex legal and financial process that can have significant consequences for all parties involved. It's important to seek professional legal and financial advice when considering winding up a company.
NATURE, ORIGIN AND DEVELOPMENT OF INTERNATIONAL LAW.pptxanvithaav
These slides helps the student of international law to understand what is the nature of international law? and how international law was originated and developed?.
The slides was well structured along with the highlighted points for better understanding .
Car Accident Injury Do I Have a Case....Knowyourright
Every year, thousands of Minnesotans are injured in car accidents. These injuries can be severe – even life-changing. Under Minnesota law, you can pursue compensation through a personal injury lawsuit.
Agrarian Reform Policies in the Philippines: a quiz
Alekseyev and others v. russia (1)
1. THIRD SECTION
DECISION
Application no. 20786/10
Andrey Vladimirovich ALEKSEYEV against Russia
and 8 other applications
(see list appended)
The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on
1 December 2016 as a Committee composed of:
Helena Jäderblom, President,
Dmitry Dedov,
Branko Lubarda, judges,
and Hasan Bakırcı, Deputy Section Registrar,
Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates
indicated in the appended table,
Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement
of the cases,
Having deliberated, decides as follows:
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
The list of applicants is set out in the appended table.
The applicants’ complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention
concerning theirs absence from civil proceedings were communicated to the
Russian Government (“the Government”).
The Court received friendly-settlement declarations under which the
applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Russia in respect of
the facts giving rise to these applications, subject to an undertaking by the
Government to pay them the amounts detailed in the appended table. These
amounts will be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the
rate applicable on the date of payment, and will be payable within three
months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of
failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three-month
period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on them, from the
2. 2 ALEKSEYEV v. RUSSIA AND OTHER APPLICATIONS DECISION
expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending
rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three
percentage points.
The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases.
THE LAW
Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court
finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision.
The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the
parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights
as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons
to justify a continued examination of the applications. In view of the above,
it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list.
For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,
Decides to join the applications;
Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance
with Article 39 of the Convention.
Done in English and notified in writing on 20 December 2016.
Hasan Bakırcı Helena Jäderblom
Deputy Registrar President
3. ALEKSEYEV v. RUSSIA AND OTHER APPLICATIONS DECISION 3
APPENDIX
No. Application no.
Date of introduction
Applicant name
Date of birth
Representative
name and location
Date of receipt of
Government
declaration
Date of receipt of
Applicant’s
declaration
Amount awarded for
non-pecuniary damage
and costs and expenses
per applicant
(in euros)i
1. 20786/10
26/03/2010
Andrey Vladimirovich
ALEKSEYEV
04/01/1974
14/09/2016 25/07/2016 1,500
2. 15542/11
03/02/2011
Dmitriy Ivanovich
FILIMONOV
22/08/1986
14/09/2016 05/08/2016 1,500
3. 43632/11
25/05/2011
Aleksey Ivanovich
BOLSUNOVSKIY
08/10/1982
14/09/2016 15/06/2016 1,500
4. 69849/11
21/11/2011
Nikita Nikolayevich
SOKOLOV
15/05/1977
Prokofyeva
Viktoriya Pavlovna
St Petersburg
14/09/2016 17/06/2016 1,500
5. 77929/11
31/03/2010
Maksim Vladimirovich
PETROV
14/11/1965
Preobrazhenskaya
Oksana
Vladimirovna
Strasbourg
14/09/2016 14/09/2016 1,500
6. 7996/12
26/12/2011
Sergey Georgiyevich
KIREYEV
07/04/1974
14/09/2016 29/06/2016 1,500
7. 31624/12
16/04/2012
Vyacheslav Galinurovich
DEMUKHAMETOV
12/05/1985
14/09/2016 01/07/2016 1,500
8. 33995/12
03/05/2012
Boris Kharisovich
MURTAZIN
07/06/1975
14/09/2016 11/07/2016 1,500
9. 35733/12
29/04/2012
Eduard Yuryevich
VERSHININ
27/11/1973
14/09/2016 03/10/2016 1,500
i
Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.