The document prompts a discussion on whether corporate intelligence is distinct from corporate espionage, asserting that 95% of the necessary strategic information is publicly accessible. It requires a rationale-supported response of at least 200 words, citing sources, particularly referencing a specific textbook. The guidelines emphasize academic integrity, prohibiting the use of Wikipedia or similar sources.

1. Agree or disagree with, and discuss the following statement:
"Corporate intelligence is not corporate espionage because 95
percent of the information a company needs to make strategic
decisions is available and accessible to the public." Explain
your rationale.
Your response should be at least 200 words in length. All
sources used, including the textbook, must be referenced;
paraphrased and quoted material must have accompanying
citations.
David, F. (2011). 1.
Strategic management: concepts & cases
(Custom Edition ed., pp. 72-74). New York: McGraw-Hill
Irwin.
No Wiki, Dictionary.com or Plagiarism