1) The document discusses how administrative adjudication undermines grievance redressal under disciplinary proceedings in India. It argues that quasi-judicial officers exercising judicial powers while remaining under executive control cannot do so impartially and without undue influence. 2) It analyzes diverging Supreme Court rulings on whether disciplinary proceedings can be initiated against quasi-judicial officers. While some rulings aim to insulate officers from executive influence to ensure neutral grievance redressal, others undermine this separation of powers. 3) Overall, the lack of clarity and consistency on this issue has compromised the neutrality of quasi-judicial officers and undermined citizens' ability to seek redressal of grievances against the government