3. WHAT IS ADEQUATE SURGICAL STAGING?
Total extrafascial hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy with pelvic and paraaortic lymph node dissection is the
standard staging procedure
5. Pelvic lymphadenectomy
• Removal of the nodal tissue from :
• distal half of the common iliac arteries
• anterior & medial aspect of
the proximal ½ of the external iliac
artery & vein
• the distal ½ of the obturator fat pad
anterior to the obturator nerve
6. Para-aortic lymph node dissection
• removal of nodal tissue :
• distal inferior vena cava from the level of the inferior mesenteric artery to the
mid right common iliac artery and
• between the aorta and left ureter from the mid inferior mesenteric artery to
the mid left common iliac artery
8. Risk factors for nodal metastases
• Serous, clear cell, or high grade histology
• Myometrial invasion greater than 50 %
• Large tumor (>2 cm in diameter or filling the endometrial cavity)
9. Node sampling versus resection
• Lymph node sampling is to obtain a representative biopsy
• Lymphadenectomy is to remove all node-bearing tissue in a specific
anatomic distribution
• Sampling may be considered in stage IA / IB
10. Adverse risk Factors :
• Age
• LVSI
• Deep myometrial
invasion
• High grade
• Serous
• Clear cell
Category 2B: Based upon lower-level evidence, there is NCCN consensus that the intervention is appropriate.
11. STAGE II
Category 2B: Based upon lower-level evidence, there is NCCN consensus that the intervention is appropriate.
16. Locoregional recurrence negative for distant
metastasis
Category 3: Based upon any level of evidence, there is major NCCN disagreement that the intervention is appropriate.
21. Observation Versus Pelvic RT
• Postoperative Radiation Therapy in Endometrial Cancer (PORTEC) trial
• statistically significant difference in the rates of vaginal/pelvic recurrence in
favor of adjuvant pelvic RT
• Overall survival was not different between the two groups (81% RT vs. 85%
surgery
• complications with pelvic RT were significantly higher (25% vs. 6%)
• The triad of lack of overall survival advantage, increased toxicity, and
high salvage rate of local recurrence for patients who are observed
have led many to conclude that all forms of adjuvant RT, not simply
pelvic RT, should be abandoned
22. Observation Versus Intravaginal RT
• Sorbe et al.,
OBSERVATION INTRAVAGINAL RT
vaginal recurrence 3.1% 1.2%
pelvic recurrence 0.9% 0.3%
overall survival No significant difference
grade 1 vaginal toxicity significantly more
gastrointestinal (GI) or
genitourinary toxicity.
No significant difference
23. Pelvic RT Versus Intravaginal RT
• PORTEC-2
• This trial showed that intravaginal RT alone is sufficient to control vaginal
recurrence even in patients with intermediate- to high-risk features.
intravaginal RT pelvic RT
3-year vaginal recurrence
rates
0.9% 1.9%
pelvic recurrence 3.5% 0.6%
rates of isolated pelvic
recurrence
0.6% 1.2%
disease-free or overall
survival
no significant difference
grades 1 and 2 acute GI
toxicity
12% 53%
26. Role of RT in Stage III
• Connell et al.
• reported on 12 patients treated with postoperative pelvic radiation with a 5-year
disease-free survival of 70.9%.
• The weighted average of 5-year disease-free and overall survival rates from
literature review in that study was 78.6% and 67.1%,
27. Role of RT in Stage III - Jabson et al
ISOLATED ADNEXAL INVOLVEMENT TREATED WITH POST OP RT
5-year disease-free 76.4%
disease specific survival 76.3%
local/regional recurrence 2.2%
distant relapse 26.1%
ISOLATED SEROSAL INVOLVEMENT TREATED WITH POST OP RT
5 year disease free 59.6%
disease-specific survival rates 75.4%
local/regional recurrence 14.3%
distant relapse 33.3%
28. Role of RT in Stage III - Mariani et al.
• This difference was statistically significant on univariate (p < .001) and
multivariate analysis (p = .03) indicating the need for postoperative
radiation even after adequate surgical staging.
inadequate lymph node
dissection and/or no RT
adequate lymph node
dissection
pelvic recurrence 57% 10%
30. Chemotherapy Versus RT Trials
• GOG 122 GYNEOCOLOGY ONCOLOGY GROUP
• The reason for the discrepancy is that in this study, there was stage imbalance, in
which there were more stage IIIA patients in the RT arm (28.2%) than in the
chemotherapy arm (18%). Conversely, there were more patients with stage IIIC
disease in the chemotherapy arm (51.5%) than in the RT arm (44.6%)
• failed to show that adjuvant chemotherapy is superior to adjuvant RT.
whole-abdomen radiation doxorubicin/cisplatin for
eight cycles
progression-free 50% 38%
overall survival rate 55% 42%
rate of relapse 54% 50%
5-year progression-free
survival rates
38% 50%
31. Chemoradiation Versus RT Trials
• Hogberg et al
RT CT->RT
5-year progression-
free survival (PFS)
61% 74% NOT significant
5-year overall
survival (OS)
73% 78% Not significant
32. Chemoradiation Versus RT Trials
• RTOG 9708 phase II
• The 4-year disease-free and overall survival rates for those with stage III
disease (66% of patients) were 72% and 77%, respectively.
34. SIMULATION
• Patients are scanned in the treatment position supine with arms on
the chest, with knees and lower legs immobilised.
• Anterior and lateral radio-opaque markers are aligned with lasers to
prevent lateral rotation.
• For obese patients, the prone bellyboard may be used to allow small
bowel to fall anteriorly away from the target volume.
35. Belly board device
The prone treatment position has been found to reduce the volume of small bowel within the pelvis, and
special belly board devices have been designed that are more effective in pushing the small bowel out of the
treatment fields than the prone position alone.
36. Group I = empty bladder without the use of belly board
Group II = empty bladder with the use of belly board
Group III = distended bladder without the use of belly board
Group IV = distended bladder with the use of belly board
37. SIMULATION
• A protocol is used to maintain a constant bladder filling ‘comfortably
full’ to push the small bowel superiorly.
• For example, patients are asked to empty the bladder and drink 200
mL water 20 minutes before the scan and treatment each day.
• The introitus is marked with radio-opaque material.
• CT scans are taken from the superior border of L3 to 5 cm beyond the
vaginal introitus.
• Intravenous contrast can be used to visualise primary tumour and
uterus if still in situ and pelvic blood vessels
38. External Beam Pelvic Irradiation
• CTV for pelvic RT consists of the
• Parametrial tissues
• Proximal half of the vagina
• Pelvic lymph node
• internal and external iliac and the lower common iliac lymph node regions)
• cervix involvement and for node +VE disease
• presacral and upper iliac lymph node regions are included
• A four-field box technique has traditionally been employed
39. External Beam Pelvic Irradiation
• PORT dose of 45 Gy to 50 Gy /1.8 Gy to 2.0 Gy /5 weeks
42. Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy
• Treatment planning studies have shown that a substantial reduction
of the doses :
• small bowel
• Rectum
• Pelvic bone marrow can be realized*
*Heron DE, Gerszten K, Selvaraj RN, et al: Conventional 3D conformal versus intensity-modulated radiotherapy for the adjuvant treatment
of gynecologic malignancies: A comparative dosimetric study of dose-volume histograms. Gynecol Oncol 91:39–45, 2003.
44. Extended-Field Irradiation
• Patients undergoing treatment to the pelvic and paraaortic regions
are usually treated in the supine position to ensure a dorsal position
of the kidneys
• Doses used for pelvic and paraaortic treatment :
45 Gy to 50.4 Gy with standard 1.8-2Gy/ fractions
• For macroscopic involved lymph nodes a boost dose may be used,
preferably using IMRT
45. DOSE CONSTRAINTS - IMRT
OAR DOSE CONSTRAINTS
small bowel <30% to receive 40 Gy;
rectum <60% to receive 30 Gy;
bladder <35% to receive 45 Gy
femoral head ≤15% to receive 30 Gy,
bone marrow ≤37% to receive 40 Gy
47. Brachytherapy Techniques
• LDR, PDR, HDR brachytherapy
• Manual / Remote afterloading applicators for intracavitary / interstitial Rx
• The type of applicator used is generally a cylinder
• Iridium-192 is used for pulsed and HDR brachytherapy
• HDR techniques may be preferred to
• avoid the increased morbidity of prolonged bed rest with PDR/LDR
• convenience of the patient and staff
48. DOSE
• for post op VBT Alone; dose is
• 6Gy x 5 # prescribed to vaginal surface
• 7Gy x 3 OR 5.5 Gy x 4 prescribed to 5mm below the vaginal surface
• When used as a boost to EBRT, doses of 4 to 6 Gy x 2 to 3 # prescribed
to vaginal mucosa
49. Vaginal Brachytherapy
• Upper vagina is the most common site of recurrence
• Adjuvant VBT is used to decrease the risk of recurrence
• Target is the upper ½ or proximal 3 cm or 4 cm of the vagina
50. Vaginal Brachytherapy
• Vaginal wall thickness of the (2 – 8mm) to be considered
• Vaginal cuff with its often irregular surface and shape POST OP
• A thicker scar or some distance between the applicator and the
mucosa warrants target points to be individually adjusted
55. MANAGEMENT
Scenario Treatment
Stage I (uterine confined) Grade 1 or 2 endometrial
cancer with initial MRI demonstrating minimal
myometrial invasion
Brachytherapy alone can be used
Stage I (uterine confined) endometrial cancer with
MRI evidence of deep myometrial invasion
A combination of external beam and brachytherapy
is recommended
Stage II endometrial cancer (involving the cervix) combination of external beam and brachytherapy
is indicated
Stage III endometrial cancer (disease has extended
outside the uterus but is regionally confined to pelvis)
combination of external beam and brachytherapy
is indicated
56. Schwarz et al :Consensus statement for brachytherapy for the treatment of medically inoperable endometrial cancer
Brachytherapy 14 (2015) 587e599
57. Brachytherapy Techniques
• A small uterus can be treated with a single tube, using a stepping
source and increasing the dwell times at the fundus to obtain a pear-
shaped isodose distribution (i.e., inverted pear).
• An intermediate-size uterus can be treated with a two-channel
applicator (one applicator in each uterine cornu), which results in a
pear-shaped isodose distribution at the fundus.
58. A - Norman Simon applicators (modified Heyman Packing for afterloading) with radioopaque marker wire for Iridium sources
The capsules at the top of the flexible tubes are 4, 6, and 8 mm wide
A
B
C
63. Acute complications
• Acute side effects may be increased when radiotherapy is combined
with concurrent chemotherapy
• Diarrhoea or abdominal discomfort may occur during EBRT, and is
usually controlled by a low residue diet and loperamide
hydrochloride.
• Care of the perineal skin is advised, but erythema and desquamation
are now uncommon with 10–16 MV beams, unless the lower vagina is
affected
64. Complications of Pelvic Irradiation
• Most significant complications
• obstruction of the small bowel,
• chronic diarrhea,
• proctitis,
• fistula formation,
• vaginal stenosis,
• Insufficiency fractures of bone
66. Chronic Complications of Pelvic Irradiation
• Pelvic RT is associated with short-term and long-term effects on GI
function, most notably increased frequency of bowel actions, less bile
acid absorption, and faster intestinal transit.
• Diarrhea,Abdominal cramping, Bowel obstruction,
• Rectal ulcer
• Hematuria
• Vaginal shortening, dyspareunia, vaginal vault necrosis, fistula
• Pedal edema
69. Complications of Pelvic Irradiation
• PORTEC trial
• Most complications (67%) were mild (grade 1), and almost 50% of symptoms
resolved in the course of 2 year to 3 years.
• GI symptoms were the predominant side effects,
• No severe late genitourinary or vaginal complications occurred.
EBRT CONTROL – NO ADDITIONAL
TREATMENT
Discontinuation of irradiation because of acute
symptoms
2%
5-year rates of any late complication 26% 4%
5-year rate of GI complications 20%.
5-year actuarial rates of severe (grade 3 or 4) late
complications
3% 0%
70. Complications of Pelvic Irradiation
• ASTEC trial
• grades 1, 2, 3, and 4 predominantly GI or urogenital late toxicity was reported
in 30%, 22%, 7%, and 1%, respectively,
RT CONTROL
Any acute toxicity 57% 27%
71. SURVEILLANCE
• Physical examination q 3-6 mo. for 2-3 yrs 6 mo. or annually
• Ca-125 if initially elevated
• Imaging studies for symptomatic cases
73. IMMUNOTHERAPY
• For patients with mismatch repair deficiency or microsatellite-
instable tumors who have experienced progression despite prior
chemotherapy, either the immune checkpoint inhibitor
pembrolizumab or endocrine therapy is an appropriate option
What is an adequately staged Carcinoma Endometrium?Prevalence of and risk factors for nodal metastasesNode sampling versus resection
715 patients after total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (TAH/BSO) to observation or pelvic RT.
stage (FIGO 1988) IB grades 2 and 3 and those with IC grades 1 and 2.
dose of pelvic RT was 46 Gy at 2 Gy per fraction
patients with stage (FIGO 1988) IA to IB grades 1 and 2 endometrioid adenocarcinoma were randomized after surgery to observation (n = 326) or intravaginal RT (n = 319).
rate of vaginal recurrence was 3.1% in the observation arm compared to 1.2% for the intravaginal RT arm (p = .114).
The rate of pelvic recurrence was 0.9% in the observation arm and 0.3% in the treatment arm
No significant difference in terms of overall survival.
There was significantly more grade 1 vaginal toxicity with intravaginal RT
There was no significant difference in gastrointestinal (GI) or genitourinary toxicity.
patients were randomized to pelvic RT (n = 214) or intravaginal RT (n = 213).
stage (FIGO 1988) IB grade 3 and >60 years old, IC grades 1 and 2 and >60 years old, and IIA grades 1 and 2 of all ages but with <50% myometrial invasion
pelvic RT was 46 Gy given in 23 fractions.
Three types of brachytherapy were used: HDR to 21 Gy in three fractions, low dose rate to 30 Gy at 0.5 to 0.7 Gy/hr, and medium dose rate to 28 Gy at 1 Gy/hr
3-year vaginal recurrence rates were 0.9% in the intravaginal RT arm and 1.9% in the pelvic RT arm (p = .97).
The pelvic recurrence was significantly different; the 3-year rate was 3.5% in the intravaginal RT arm compared to 0.6% in the pelvic RT arm (p = .03).
The corresponding rates of isolated pelvic recurrence, however, were not significant: 0.6% versus 1.2%, respectively (p = .54).
There was no significant difference in disease-free or overall survival between the two arms.
The rate of grades 1 and 2 acute GI toxicity was 53% versus 12% in favor of intravaginal RT (p < .001).
randomized to adjuvant intravaginal RT (IVRT; n = 263) or pelvic and IVRT (n = 264).
no difference in vaginal recurrence, which was 2.7% (7 of 263) in the IVRT-alone arm compared to 1.9% (5 of 264) in the combined arm (p = .555).
Pelvic recurrence rate, however, was different: 5.3% in the IVRT arm compared to 0.4% in the pelvic plus IVRT arm (p = .0006).
There was no significant difference in overall survival between the two arms (90% vs. 89%, respectively).
The toxicity was significantly higher in the combined arm compared to IVRT alone
reported 5-year disease-free and disease specific survival of 76.4% and 76.3%, respectively, in 46 patients with isolated adnexal involvement treated with postoperative RT.
The rate of local/regional recurrence was 2.2% (1 of 46) and that of distant relapse was 26.1% (12 of 46).
the outcome of patients with isolated serosal involvement (n = 21) was somewhat similar: the 5-year disease-free and disease-specific survival rates were 59.6% and 75.4.3%, respectively.
The rate of local/regional recurrence was 14.3% (3 of 21) and that of distant relapse was 33.3%
reported on 122 patients with node-positive disease;
at 5 years the risk of pelvic recurrence was 57% after inadequate lymph node dissection and/or no RT compared to 10% with adequate lymph node dissection (>10 pelvic nodes and ≥5 para-aortic nodes) and RT.
396 patients with stage (FIGO 1988) III to IV disease were randomized to whole-abdomen radiation (n = 202) versus doxorubicin/cisplatin (n = 194) for eight cycles
there was significant improvement in both progression-free (50% vs. 38%; p = .007) and overall survival rate (55% vs. 42%;
overall absolute rate of relapse was 54% in the radiation arm compared to 50% in the chemotherapy arm, a small difference, if any, and yet the corresponding 5-year progression-free survival rates were 38% and 50% (p = .007), respectively.
The 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 61% in the RT group compared to 74% for the chemoradiation group, but that difference was not significant (p = .1).
The was also not significant (73% vs. 78%, respectively; p = .41)
5-year PFS was better for the chemoradiation arm (79% vs. 72% for RT; p = .04), but OS was not significantly better (83% vs. 76%, respectively; p = .1).
reported on two trials (Mario Negri Gynecologic Oncology Group [MaNGO] and Nordic Society of Gynecological Oncology [NSGO]/European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer [EORTC])
In the MaNGO trial there were 157 patients (two-thirds were stage III); 76 were randomized to postoperative pelvic RT (45 Gy) and 80 to chemotherapy followed by pelvic RT. The chemotherapy consisted of three cycles of doxorubicin (60 mg/m2) and cisplatin (50 mg/m2).
44 patients with stages (FIGO 1988) I to III endometrial cancer who were treated with pelvic radiation and intravaginal RT given concurrently with cisplatin 50 mg/m2 on days 1 and 28 of radiation followed by four cycles of cisplatin (50 mg/m2) and Taxol (175 mg/m2).
The prone treatment position has been found to reduce the volume of small bowel within the pelvis, and special belly board devices have been designed that are more effective in pushing the small bowel out of the treatment fields than the prone position alone.
A four-field box technique has traditionally been employed, which had a smaller volume of small bowel in the high-dose region compared with anterior and posterior parallel-opposed ports
LDR 0.2- 2 GY
MDR 2 – 12 GY
HDR - >12GY
Brachytherapy dose was equivalent to 14 Gy in 2 Gy fractions (with recommended scheme of 10 Gy high-dose rate [HDR] in fractions of 5 Gy), specified at 5 mm from the vaginal vault surface *
* - PORTEC 3 TRIAL
WHAT IS THE RATE OF VAGINAL FAILURE?
moderate-dose fractionation schedules of VBT provide high vaginal control rates (>95%) and low morbidity rates
, particularly if the wall is very thin, as this will affect the dose at the anterior rectal wall
but the close vicinity of the bowel which may lie directly on the vaginal cuff, must be kept in mind
VBT can be performed as an outpatient procedure, especially when a vaginal cylinder is used, for which no sedation or anesthesia is needed
When a vaginal cylinder is used, the largest diameter that smoothly fits the vagina should be chosen to increase the relative dose at depth compared to the surface.
radiographs are obtained to verify the appropriate placement of the applicator in relation to the vaginal cuff markers and for dosimetric calculations.
careful attention must be paid to maintaining close contact between the applicator surface and the vaginal mucosa, in particular at the vaginal cuff.
this can usually be achieved by choosing a diameter that leads to some distention of the extensible vagina which fills the whole vagina.
Complication rates are dose and volume dependent and are higher for the combination of pelvic EBRT and VBT than for EBRT alone
Complication rates after EBRT are also increased if a full lymphadenectomy is added to the hysterectomy
hormone replacement therapy may be given to improve menopausal symptoms and prevent osteoporosis
The risk of lymphoedema is increased when EBRT is given to patients who have undergone BPLND.
63% of the patients were treated during standard four-field pelvic EBRT with medication or dietary measures, or both, for mild, acute symptoms.
Discontinuation of irradiation because of acute symptoms occurred in 2% of cases
5-year actuarial rates of any late complication in the PORTEC trial were 26% in the RT group and 4% in the control group (p <
any acute toxicity was reported in 57% of patients who underwent RT compared with 27% for controls and involved mostly mild (32%) or moderate symptoms.
such as chest radiography, CT, magnetic resonance imaging should be performed for patients who are symptomatic or have abnormal findings on physical examination
TAP (taxane/anthracycline/platinum)
Paclitaxel (M) phase of the cell cycle