The DIAN trials aim to test potential treatments for dominantly inherited Alzheimer's disease through a two-phase study design. The first phase will evaluate biological and biomarker effects over two years. If successful, the second phase will assess cognitive benefits over three additional years. Up to five potential drug candidates have been nominated for initial testing. The expanded DIAN registry is helping recruit sufficient interested participants to power the clinical trials.
The Canadian Adverse Events Study: The Incidence of Adverse Events among hospital patients in Canada. Philippe Hébert. Presentation of the National Study of Adverse Events(Madrid, Ministry of Health and Consumer Affairs, 2006)
1) A clinical trial assessed whether chelation therapy improved quality of life outcomes in patients with stable coronary artery disease and a history of heart attack.
2) The trial found no consistent or sustained improvements in domains of health-related quality of life, including physical and mental functioning, with chelation therapy over 2 years of follow up.
3) A subgroup analysis found a potential benefit of chelation therapy for patients with angina symptoms at baseline, but no benefit was seen for patients with heart failure symptoms.
Clinical trials progress through phases (preclinical, I-IV) to evaluate treatments safely in humans. Preclinical testing occurs in labs and animals. Phase I studies evaluate safety in 20-80 healthy volunteers. Phase II expands to 100-300 patient volunteers to assess efficacy. Phase III further tests efficacy in 1,000-3,000 patients. FDA approval requires compliance with Good Clinical Practice guidelines to protect subject rights and ensure credible data. Key elements include oversight by independent review boards, informed consent, qualified investigators and sponsors, adherence to protocols, and comprehensive record keeping.
Noa Efrat Ben Baruch : Oncotype Dx Breast Cancer Assay and impact on treatmen...breastcancerupdatecongress
This document discusses the impact and utility of the Oncotype DX Breast Cancer Assay for treatment decision making in early-stage breast cancer patients. It provides data on:
1) Changes in treatment recommendations pre- and post-Oncotype DX results, with about 30% of patients being spared chemotherapy based on their Recurrence Score.
2) Increased confidence in treatment decisions reported by both physicians and patients after receiving Recurrence Score results.
3) Preliminary data suggesting Recurrence Score results may impact patient outcomes, though long-term data is still needed.
4) Evidence that the assay provides good value and cost-effectiveness for healthcare systems.
Published Research, Flawed, Misleading, Nefarious - Use of Reporting Guidelin...John Hoey
Much published health sciences literature is misleading and biased
Efforts to correct this include use of reporting guidelines- criteria for doing science and reporting the results properly
Also discussion of conflicts of interest - how to report them.
1. The document discusses the recommendations from the Royal Statistical Society Working Party report on ethical, practical and statistical considerations in designing first-in-man studies. The report made recommendations around generic issues, preparatory work, protocol content, risk sharing and reporting standards.
2. The report recommended that regulators provide more statistical expertise, mandatory insurance for participants, and only conducting studies at tertiary care hospitals if there is any risk of a cytokine storm. Protocols should provide quantitative justification of doses and risks with uncertainty and study classification.
3. Subsequent work has further explored trial design considerations like variance of treatment contrasts and dynamic decision making based on interim results, but safety in first-in-man studies remains a challenge that requires
Well-trained clinical research professionals are in high demand. The tremendous increase in medical technology and information in the last decade has resulted in an explosion of potential new drugs, devices and biologics that must be tested before being released for use by the public. The profession is constantly challenged to improve and streamline the clinical research programs in order to shorten the development timelines and control the cost for new product development
The Canadian Adverse Events Study: The Incidence of Adverse Events among hospital patients in Canada. Philippe Hébert. Presentation of the National Study of Adverse Events(Madrid, Ministry of Health and Consumer Affairs, 2006)
1) A clinical trial assessed whether chelation therapy improved quality of life outcomes in patients with stable coronary artery disease and a history of heart attack.
2) The trial found no consistent or sustained improvements in domains of health-related quality of life, including physical and mental functioning, with chelation therapy over 2 years of follow up.
3) A subgroup analysis found a potential benefit of chelation therapy for patients with angina symptoms at baseline, but no benefit was seen for patients with heart failure symptoms.
Clinical trials progress through phases (preclinical, I-IV) to evaluate treatments safely in humans. Preclinical testing occurs in labs and animals. Phase I studies evaluate safety in 20-80 healthy volunteers. Phase II expands to 100-300 patient volunteers to assess efficacy. Phase III further tests efficacy in 1,000-3,000 patients. FDA approval requires compliance with Good Clinical Practice guidelines to protect subject rights and ensure credible data. Key elements include oversight by independent review boards, informed consent, qualified investigators and sponsors, adherence to protocols, and comprehensive record keeping.
Noa Efrat Ben Baruch : Oncotype Dx Breast Cancer Assay and impact on treatmen...breastcancerupdatecongress
This document discusses the impact and utility of the Oncotype DX Breast Cancer Assay for treatment decision making in early-stage breast cancer patients. It provides data on:
1) Changes in treatment recommendations pre- and post-Oncotype DX results, with about 30% of patients being spared chemotherapy based on their Recurrence Score.
2) Increased confidence in treatment decisions reported by both physicians and patients after receiving Recurrence Score results.
3) Preliminary data suggesting Recurrence Score results may impact patient outcomes, though long-term data is still needed.
4) Evidence that the assay provides good value and cost-effectiveness for healthcare systems.
Published Research, Flawed, Misleading, Nefarious - Use of Reporting Guidelin...John Hoey
Much published health sciences literature is misleading and biased
Efforts to correct this include use of reporting guidelines- criteria for doing science and reporting the results properly
Also discussion of conflicts of interest - how to report them.
1. The document discusses the recommendations from the Royal Statistical Society Working Party report on ethical, practical and statistical considerations in designing first-in-man studies. The report made recommendations around generic issues, preparatory work, protocol content, risk sharing and reporting standards.
2. The report recommended that regulators provide more statistical expertise, mandatory insurance for participants, and only conducting studies at tertiary care hospitals if there is any risk of a cytokine storm. Protocols should provide quantitative justification of doses and risks with uncertainty and study classification.
3. Subsequent work has further explored trial design considerations like variance of treatment contrasts and dynamic decision making based on interim results, but safety in first-in-man studies remains a challenge that requires
Well-trained clinical research professionals are in high demand. The tremendous increase in medical technology and information in the last decade has resulted in an explosion of potential new drugs, devices and biologics that must be tested before being released for use by the public. The profession is constantly challenged to improve and streamline the clinical research programs in order to shorten the development timelines and control the cost for new product development
This document provides guidance for emerging biotech companies on planning and conducting preclinical development programs to support a First-in-Human clinical trial. It outlines typical timelines, challenges companies may face, requirements for an Investigational New Drug Application, and considerations for general toxicology programs and studies. Specific examples of preclinical development programs are also provided for a new cancer drug and a biologic for a non-cancer indication. Strategies are suggested to help companies have a successful preclinical program that results in a high-quality regulatory submission.
This document discusses selecting appropriate databases and searching strategies for answering clinical questions. It provides three sample clinical cases and the steps taken to answer each case using different databases including Medline, textbooks, guidelines and clinical reviews. Key points discussed include choosing sources based on content type, using keywords and search filters, and evaluating the level of evidence of search results.
1. This study was a cluster randomized controlled trial that assessed the effects of periodic vitamin A supplementation and deworming on child mortality in 1 million preschool children in North India.
2. The study had a 5-year study period from 1999-2004 and used a 2x2 factorial design to examine the effects of 6-monthly vitamin A supplementation, 6-monthly deworming with albendazole, and their combination on mortality in children aged 1-6 years.
3. The results found that vitamin A supplementation alone did not reduce child mortality as much as expected based on previous trials, reducing mortality by only 4%. However, meta-analysis of this study combined with previous trials still showed an average
The document discusses Bristol Bay Area Health Corporation's (BBAHC) performance on Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) measures for fiscal year 2011. BBAHC met or exceeded the goals for 21 of the 21 GPRA measures, including measures related to diabetes care, cancer screenings, immunizations, tobacco cessation, and prenatal care. The document also provides BBAHC's monthly progress report on GPRA measures for fiscal year 2012, showing performance relative to goals.
Presentation: Medicinal Cannabis Evidence for Efficacy Clinical Guidance Deve...TGA Australia
The document summarizes reviews of evidence for the efficacy of medicinal cannabis. Regarding epilepsy, randomized controlled trials and observational studies indicate CBD may provide therapeutic benefits for reducing seizure frequency and improving quality of life. CBD was generally well tolerated, with some reports of sleepiness and elevated liver enzymes. For palliative care, a review of 9 studies found cannabinoids may provide a trend toward reducing cancer pain and significantly improved pain in HIV/AIDS, but did not significantly impact appetite or pain reduction compared to placebo.
Preclinical Development Planning for Emerging Pharma and Biotech FirmsMaRS Discovery District
Part of the MaRS Best Practices Series. Speaker: Valentia Lee-Brotherton, PhD, Ashuren. This session, led by seasoned industry experts, will explore how to effectively set up your pre-clinical POC studies, address pre-clinical safety requirements and issues, and give you an overview of the manufacturing standards required for Phase I studies.
More information: http://www.marsdd.com/Events/Event-Calendar/Best-Practices-Series/ind-05132008.html
The document provides an overview of the drug development process. It discusses the major stages of clinical trials from Phase I to Phase IV that drugs must go through for testing and approval. The goals are to determine safety, efficacy, appropriate dosing, and identify any adverse effects. Rigorous clinical trials with control groups, randomization, and large sample sizes are necessary to provide substantial evidence for approval. The overall process takes an average of about 100 months from initial synthesis to approval.
When you have a rare cancer like mesothelioma, it can be challenging to find treatment options as well as hope for your future. Clinical trials offer patients the opportunity to try the latest medications, surgical procedures or diagnostic screening tools which do provide realistic hope for longer, better quality of life. Many patients have questions about how to find clinical trials that they may be eligible for, understanding the different phases of a clinical trial and what to expect throughout the process. During our January session, we will discuss this and more!
An HIV Post-Exposure Prophylaxis Pilot Program Implemented in Public Health S...CDC NPIN
This document summarizes a pilot program that implemented non-occupational HIV post-exposure prophylaxis (nPEP) in public health settings in Los Angeles. The pilot demonstrated that nPEP can be feasibly implemented in clinical care settings for high-risk populations. Over the course of the pilot, 163 individuals were enrolled and received a 28-day course of antiretroviral therapy within 72 hours of exposure. Four seroconversions occurred. The next steps involve sustaining the nPEP program with a few modifications, including streamlining follow-up and integrating behavioral counseling.
The document discusses good clinical practice (GCP) and provides an overview of the drug development process, forms of research misconduct like the Tuskegee trials, and GCP guidelines including obtaining informed consent, maintaining accurate records, ensuring safety reporting, and protecting trial participants. The importance of following protocols, training personnel, documenting procedures, and communicating with stakeholders is emphasized for upholding ethical standards in clinical research.
Enhancing the quality and transparency of health research: Introducing the PR...Thomas Bandholm
This lecture was held September 14 in Aalborg, Denmark at a PhD Forum (symposium). I hope you find it useful. Kind regards Thomas Bandholm (Twitter@TBandholm).
This document summarizes key findings from a study on returning genomic sequencing results to patients with idiopathic diseases and their physicians. The study found that [1] physicians may need help interpreting and communicating genomic results to patients, as post-sequencing patients graded their physician's communication skills lower than pre-sequencing, and [2] both patients and physicians preferred that secondary or incidental findings from sequencing be returned. The study highlights the challenges of integrating genomic medicine into clinical practice and the need for improved physician education in genetics and result disclosure.
The document discusses searching the pharmacology literature. It outlines the five phases of the drug life cycle: drug discovery, pre-clinical research, clinical trials, review, and ongoing analysis. It provides examples of databases to search within each phase, such as PubMed, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Advanced search techniques are covered, including using subject headings, Boolean operators, and filters. It also reviews citation management software like RefWorks.
Evidence on the long term effects of brestfeedingPaul Mark Pilar
This document presents a summary of 5 systematic reviews on the long-term effects of breastfeeding. The reviews examined the relationship between breastfeeding and blood pressure, cholesterol levels, risk of overweight/obesity, risk of type-2 diabetes, and school achievement/intelligence. The reviews found that breastfeeding was associated with lower blood pressure and cholesterol levels in adulthood, lower risk of overweight/obesity, and lower risk of type-2 diabetes. Breastfeeding was also associated with higher school achievement and intelligence levels, although there was more heterogeneity in those findings. Publication bias and residual confounding did not fully explain the observed effects, suggesting that breastfeeding provides meaningful long-term health benefits.
Drug development involves rigorous pre-clinical and clinical testing to prove a drug is safe and effective. Pre-clinical testing involves laboratory and animal studies. Clinical trials in humans have four phases, with each subsequent phase involving more subjects to further evaluate safety, efficacy, and optimal dosage. After Phase III trials demonstrate a drug's benefits outweigh its risks, a New Drug Application is submitted to regulators for review. If approved, Phase IV trials continue monitoring the drug's long-term safety profile after market approval. The entire process from discovery to market approval takes an average of 8-12 years and costs $800-900 million.
CLARITY BPA: a Novel Approach to study EDCsDES Daughter
by the Collaborative on Health and the Environment
On this call Retha Newbold, MS, Researcher Emeritus, National Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, discussed the program called “The Consortium Linking Academic and Regulatory Insights on the Toxicity of Bisphenol A (CLARITY-BPA)” which is an interagency agreement, conducted under the auspices of the National Toxicology Program (NTP), between The National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) supported grantees, the staff of the Division of the National Toxicology Program (DNTP) at NIH/NIEHS, and the Food and Drug Administration at the National Center for Toxicological Research (FDA/NCTR). The goals of the consortium are to enhance the utility of a perinatal 2-year GLP chronic toxicity study on BPA for regulatory decision-making by incorporating a wide range of doses and some additional disease-related endpoints that are not usually covered.
To this end, 12 NIEHS grantees are studying hypothesis-driven mechanisms by investigating specific endpoints that maybe altered by BPA including behavioral/neuroendocrine, immune function, cardiac, reproductive tract, cancer, thyroid, and other organ systems. This consortium is unique in that it combines the knowledge and skills of the NTP staff with experts from the academic field who are covering more mechanistic studies. Although this program focuses on BPA, it may provide an example of how to better study effects of other endocrine disrupting chemicals especially since numerous organ systems may be involved.
Sources: http://www.healthandenvironment.org/partnership_calls/14639
Eeesentials of Reading Biomedical Research Papers 2021 version.pptxMingdergLai
The document outlines two main types of biomedical research papers - studies where all experiments are designed in advance, and studies where the results of one experiment determine the next. It discusses two types of reading for research papers - skim reading to understand the key questions and conclusions, and close reading which requires a more critical analysis of the data and methods. For any type of reading, the key is to understand what is already known on the topic and what new information the paper provides.
Presentation at "Impact Evaluation for Financial Inclusion" (January 2013)
CGAP and the UK Department for International Development (DFID) convened over 70 funders, practitioners, and researchers for a workshop on impact evaluation for financial inclusion in January 2013. Co-hosted by DFID in London, the workshop was an opportunity for participants to engage with leading researchers on the latest research methods of impact evaluation and to discuss other areas on the impact evaluation agenda.
The document discusses guidelines and requirements for randomized clinical trials. It covers several key points:
1) Randomized clinical trials are the highest level of evidence but have special methodology requirements regarding ethics, statistics, and reporting.
2) International regulatory bodies like the ICH and EMEA provide guidelines on topics like statistical principles, handling missing data and multiplicity issues.
3) Journals require trials to adhere to standards like registering in a public trials registry and indicating whether their procedures followed the Declaration of Helsinki.
4) Researchers have an obligation to publish results and maintain independent access to and analysis of trial data. Assistance received must also be disclosed.
"IOS 18 CONTROL CENTRE REVAMP STREAMLINED IPHONE SHUTDOWN MADE EASIER"Emmanuel Onwumere
In iOS 18, Apple has introduced a significant revamp to the Control Centre, making it more intuitive and user-friendly. One of the standout features is a quicker and more accessible way to shut down your iPhone. This enhancement aims to streamline the user experience, allowing for faster access to essential functions. Discover how iOS 18's redesigned Control Centre can simplify your daily interactions with your iPhone, bringing convenience right at your fingertips.
This document provides guidance for emerging biotech companies on planning and conducting preclinical development programs to support a First-in-Human clinical trial. It outlines typical timelines, challenges companies may face, requirements for an Investigational New Drug Application, and considerations for general toxicology programs and studies. Specific examples of preclinical development programs are also provided for a new cancer drug and a biologic for a non-cancer indication. Strategies are suggested to help companies have a successful preclinical program that results in a high-quality regulatory submission.
This document discusses selecting appropriate databases and searching strategies for answering clinical questions. It provides three sample clinical cases and the steps taken to answer each case using different databases including Medline, textbooks, guidelines and clinical reviews. Key points discussed include choosing sources based on content type, using keywords and search filters, and evaluating the level of evidence of search results.
1. This study was a cluster randomized controlled trial that assessed the effects of periodic vitamin A supplementation and deworming on child mortality in 1 million preschool children in North India.
2. The study had a 5-year study period from 1999-2004 and used a 2x2 factorial design to examine the effects of 6-monthly vitamin A supplementation, 6-monthly deworming with albendazole, and their combination on mortality in children aged 1-6 years.
3. The results found that vitamin A supplementation alone did not reduce child mortality as much as expected based on previous trials, reducing mortality by only 4%. However, meta-analysis of this study combined with previous trials still showed an average
The document discusses Bristol Bay Area Health Corporation's (BBAHC) performance on Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) measures for fiscal year 2011. BBAHC met or exceeded the goals for 21 of the 21 GPRA measures, including measures related to diabetes care, cancer screenings, immunizations, tobacco cessation, and prenatal care. The document also provides BBAHC's monthly progress report on GPRA measures for fiscal year 2012, showing performance relative to goals.
Presentation: Medicinal Cannabis Evidence for Efficacy Clinical Guidance Deve...TGA Australia
The document summarizes reviews of evidence for the efficacy of medicinal cannabis. Regarding epilepsy, randomized controlled trials and observational studies indicate CBD may provide therapeutic benefits for reducing seizure frequency and improving quality of life. CBD was generally well tolerated, with some reports of sleepiness and elevated liver enzymes. For palliative care, a review of 9 studies found cannabinoids may provide a trend toward reducing cancer pain and significantly improved pain in HIV/AIDS, but did not significantly impact appetite or pain reduction compared to placebo.
Preclinical Development Planning for Emerging Pharma and Biotech FirmsMaRS Discovery District
Part of the MaRS Best Practices Series. Speaker: Valentia Lee-Brotherton, PhD, Ashuren. This session, led by seasoned industry experts, will explore how to effectively set up your pre-clinical POC studies, address pre-clinical safety requirements and issues, and give you an overview of the manufacturing standards required for Phase I studies.
More information: http://www.marsdd.com/Events/Event-Calendar/Best-Practices-Series/ind-05132008.html
The document provides an overview of the drug development process. It discusses the major stages of clinical trials from Phase I to Phase IV that drugs must go through for testing and approval. The goals are to determine safety, efficacy, appropriate dosing, and identify any adverse effects. Rigorous clinical trials with control groups, randomization, and large sample sizes are necessary to provide substantial evidence for approval. The overall process takes an average of about 100 months from initial synthesis to approval.
When you have a rare cancer like mesothelioma, it can be challenging to find treatment options as well as hope for your future. Clinical trials offer patients the opportunity to try the latest medications, surgical procedures or diagnostic screening tools which do provide realistic hope for longer, better quality of life. Many patients have questions about how to find clinical trials that they may be eligible for, understanding the different phases of a clinical trial and what to expect throughout the process. During our January session, we will discuss this and more!
An HIV Post-Exposure Prophylaxis Pilot Program Implemented in Public Health S...CDC NPIN
This document summarizes a pilot program that implemented non-occupational HIV post-exposure prophylaxis (nPEP) in public health settings in Los Angeles. The pilot demonstrated that nPEP can be feasibly implemented in clinical care settings for high-risk populations. Over the course of the pilot, 163 individuals were enrolled and received a 28-day course of antiretroviral therapy within 72 hours of exposure. Four seroconversions occurred. The next steps involve sustaining the nPEP program with a few modifications, including streamlining follow-up and integrating behavioral counseling.
The document discusses good clinical practice (GCP) and provides an overview of the drug development process, forms of research misconduct like the Tuskegee trials, and GCP guidelines including obtaining informed consent, maintaining accurate records, ensuring safety reporting, and protecting trial participants. The importance of following protocols, training personnel, documenting procedures, and communicating with stakeholders is emphasized for upholding ethical standards in clinical research.
Enhancing the quality and transparency of health research: Introducing the PR...Thomas Bandholm
This lecture was held September 14 in Aalborg, Denmark at a PhD Forum (symposium). I hope you find it useful. Kind regards Thomas Bandholm (Twitter@TBandholm).
This document summarizes key findings from a study on returning genomic sequencing results to patients with idiopathic diseases and their physicians. The study found that [1] physicians may need help interpreting and communicating genomic results to patients, as post-sequencing patients graded their physician's communication skills lower than pre-sequencing, and [2] both patients and physicians preferred that secondary or incidental findings from sequencing be returned. The study highlights the challenges of integrating genomic medicine into clinical practice and the need for improved physician education in genetics and result disclosure.
The document discusses searching the pharmacology literature. It outlines the five phases of the drug life cycle: drug discovery, pre-clinical research, clinical trials, review, and ongoing analysis. It provides examples of databases to search within each phase, such as PubMed, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Advanced search techniques are covered, including using subject headings, Boolean operators, and filters. It also reviews citation management software like RefWorks.
Evidence on the long term effects of brestfeedingPaul Mark Pilar
This document presents a summary of 5 systematic reviews on the long-term effects of breastfeeding. The reviews examined the relationship between breastfeeding and blood pressure, cholesterol levels, risk of overweight/obesity, risk of type-2 diabetes, and school achievement/intelligence. The reviews found that breastfeeding was associated with lower blood pressure and cholesterol levels in adulthood, lower risk of overweight/obesity, and lower risk of type-2 diabetes. Breastfeeding was also associated with higher school achievement and intelligence levels, although there was more heterogeneity in those findings. Publication bias and residual confounding did not fully explain the observed effects, suggesting that breastfeeding provides meaningful long-term health benefits.
Drug development involves rigorous pre-clinical and clinical testing to prove a drug is safe and effective. Pre-clinical testing involves laboratory and animal studies. Clinical trials in humans have four phases, with each subsequent phase involving more subjects to further evaluate safety, efficacy, and optimal dosage. After Phase III trials demonstrate a drug's benefits outweigh its risks, a New Drug Application is submitted to regulators for review. If approved, Phase IV trials continue monitoring the drug's long-term safety profile after market approval. The entire process from discovery to market approval takes an average of 8-12 years and costs $800-900 million.
CLARITY BPA: a Novel Approach to study EDCsDES Daughter
by the Collaborative on Health and the Environment
On this call Retha Newbold, MS, Researcher Emeritus, National Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, discussed the program called “The Consortium Linking Academic and Regulatory Insights on the Toxicity of Bisphenol A (CLARITY-BPA)” which is an interagency agreement, conducted under the auspices of the National Toxicology Program (NTP), between The National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) supported grantees, the staff of the Division of the National Toxicology Program (DNTP) at NIH/NIEHS, and the Food and Drug Administration at the National Center for Toxicological Research (FDA/NCTR). The goals of the consortium are to enhance the utility of a perinatal 2-year GLP chronic toxicity study on BPA for regulatory decision-making by incorporating a wide range of doses and some additional disease-related endpoints that are not usually covered.
To this end, 12 NIEHS grantees are studying hypothesis-driven mechanisms by investigating specific endpoints that maybe altered by BPA including behavioral/neuroendocrine, immune function, cardiac, reproductive tract, cancer, thyroid, and other organ systems. This consortium is unique in that it combines the knowledge and skills of the NTP staff with experts from the academic field who are covering more mechanistic studies. Although this program focuses on BPA, it may provide an example of how to better study effects of other endocrine disrupting chemicals especially since numerous organ systems may be involved.
Sources: http://www.healthandenvironment.org/partnership_calls/14639
Eeesentials of Reading Biomedical Research Papers 2021 version.pptxMingdergLai
The document outlines two main types of biomedical research papers - studies where all experiments are designed in advance, and studies where the results of one experiment determine the next. It discusses two types of reading for research papers - skim reading to understand the key questions and conclusions, and close reading which requires a more critical analysis of the data and methods. For any type of reading, the key is to understand what is already known on the topic and what new information the paper provides.
Presentation at "Impact Evaluation for Financial Inclusion" (January 2013)
CGAP and the UK Department for International Development (DFID) convened over 70 funders, practitioners, and researchers for a workshop on impact evaluation for financial inclusion in January 2013. Co-hosted by DFID in London, the workshop was an opportunity for participants to engage with leading researchers on the latest research methods of impact evaluation and to discuss other areas on the impact evaluation agenda.
The document discusses guidelines and requirements for randomized clinical trials. It covers several key points:
1) Randomized clinical trials are the highest level of evidence but have special methodology requirements regarding ethics, statistics, and reporting.
2) International regulatory bodies like the ICH and EMEA provide guidelines on topics like statistical principles, handling missing data and multiplicity issues.
3) Journals require trials to adhere to standards like registering in a public trials registry and indicating whether their procedures followed the Declaration of Helsinki.
4) Researchers have an obligation to publish results and maintain independent access to and analysis of trial data. Assistance received must also be disclosed.
"IOS 18 CONTROL CENTRE REVAMP STREAMLINED IPHONE SHUTDOWN MADE EASIER"Emmanuel Onwumere
In iOS 18, Apple has introduced a significant revamp to the Control Centre, making it more intuitive and user-friendly. One of the standout features is a quicker and more accessible way to shut down your iPhone. This enhancement aims to streamline the user experience, allowing for faster access to essential functions. Discover how iOS 18's redesigned Control Centre can simplify your daily interactions with your iPhone, bringing convenience right at your fingertips.
1. The DIAN Treatment Trials:
An Update
Sunday, May 6
4:00-5:00 PM CDT
Presented by Randall Bateman, MD
DIAN Therapeutic Trials Unit Director
DIAN Clinical Core Leader
3. The Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer’s Network DIAN
Coordinating Center Cores
Admin – JC Morris Genetics – AM Goate
Clinical – RJ Bateman Imaging – T Benzinger
Biomarkers – AM Fagan Informatics – D Marcus
Biostatistics – C Xiong Neuropathology – NJ Cairns
Performance Sites
• United States: Washington Univ (Bateman), MGH/BWH (Sperling), Butler Hosp/Brown
Univ (Salloway), Columbia Univ (Mayeux), Indiana Univ (Ghetti), UCLA (Ringman), U of
Pittsburgh (Klunk), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville (Graff-Radford)
• Europe: Institute of Neurology, Univ College London (Rossor), Ludwig-Maximilians-
Universität München (Danek), University of Tübingen (Jucker)
• Australia: Prince of Wales Medical Research Institutes, Sydney (Schofield), Mental Health
Health Research Institute, Melbourne (Masters), Edith Cowan Univ , Perth (Martins)
f Pittsburgh (Klunk), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville (Graff-Radford)
Clinical Trials Committee
DIAN family participant , Paul Aisen, Randy Bateman, Neil Buckholtz, Nick Fox,
Alison Goate, Bill Klunk, Ranjit Mani, John Ringman, Laurie Ryan, Stephen Salloway,
Reisa Sperling, Chengjie Xiong
4. DIAN Clinical Core Enrollment Report
Initial Visits Follow-up Visits Follow-up Visits
Actual In-Person Remote
Year One
(9/2008-6/2009) 11 0 0
Year Two
(7/2009-6/2010) 76 0 5
Year Three
(7/2010-6/2011) 103 25 40
Year Four
(7/2011 through 2/2012) 52 34 60
YTD Totals 242 59 105
5. DIAN Therapeutic
Trials Unit (TTU) Update
• October, 2011: DIAN trials grant submitted to NIH.
• December, 2011: DIAN Pharma Consortium
formed (10 leading pharmaceutical companies)
and TTU funded
• 14 compounds nominated and reviewed:
– anti amyloid-beta, passive immunotherapies, secretase
inhibitors, others
– 5 proposed for immediate consideration.
• April, 2012: Expanded Registry launched
8. DIAN Expanded Registry
• Provides an overview of Autosomal Dominant
Alzheimer’s disease (ADAD), links to other web
resources (alzforum.org).
• Operational as of Feb 2012, announced in April, ~65
interested participants have registered.
– Current DIAN observational study participants, family
members and those interested in future trials are
registering on the website
– Physicians and researchers interested in participating
as an investigator or referring potential patients from
their practice are also registering
10. DIAN Clinical Trials NIA Grant Overview
Title: Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network Trials: An Opportunity to Prevent Dementia .
Application submitted October 5, 2011, reviewed March 2, 2011
Summary: The application proposes to initiate DIAN clinical trials with a two-phase study to
delay, prevent, or restore cognitive loss in AD mutation carriers.
The first phase to determine the biological engagement of the drug target and impact on
biomarkers of neurodegeneration.
The second phase to determine if there is a cognitive benefit of treatment.
11. Grant Review Summary Statement
“There was much enthusiasm for this innovative
application and its efficient linking with DIAN. The overall
goal of prevention for those patients at very high risk of
AD in this cohort is highly significant. The innovative
design, strong investigative team and environment and
the compelling pilot data from the parent DIAN
participants are other big strengths of the proposed
study.”
Concern: Ability to recruit sufficient numbers of
participants (only counting numbers enrolled)
12. Trial Design Outline – Years 1 & 2
• 3 parallel, placebo controlled, double-blinded,
biomarker outcome trials
• Up to 80 participants enrolled in each trial
– 40 mutation carriers (30 on active drug treatment, 10 on
placebo)
– 10 to 40 non-carriers on placebo to maintain genetic status
blind
• Drug treatment duration = 2 years
• Placebo participants pooled from the trials to
provide a common pool of 30 placebo for
comparison of biomarker (phase IIb) outcomes.
13. Trial Design Outline Years 3-5
Outcomes:
• If one trial is successful, it will continue while enrolling a total
of 240 participants
• If none of the three original trials is successful, and three new
drugs are suitable and available, start 3 new biomarker trials.
A B C
DIAN study
3:1 active to Drug A, B, or C Years Years
placebo monthly for 22 mo 0 1 2 3 4 5 0 1 2 3 4 5
(run-in)
(pooled placebo)
A (80) A (80) D (80)
B (80) B (240) B (80) E (80)
Biomarker, clinical, and cognitive measures and
samples C (80) C (80) F (80)
Figure 1. Trial Design and Potential Outcomes. 240 participants are enrolled into a four arm study of drug A,
drug B, drug C, and placebo. Mutation negative participants are assigned placebo, while mutation positive
participants are randomized to drug or placebo in a 3:1 ratio (A). 80 participants will be enrolled in each of
three two-year biomarker trials; 40 mutation carriers and up to 40 non-carriers will be enrolled in each trial.
Biomarker outcomes through week 96 will be assessed before the start of Year 3. In B, one trial is successful
and continues while enrolling a total of 240 participants in the three-year cognitive endpoint trial. In C, none
of the three original trials is successful, and three new two-year biomarker trials are begun.
14. Clinical Trial Design
• Study visits:
– Monthly infusions or injections
– Safety MRI every 3 months
– Length of commitment is 2 years for first part of
study, 3 additional years if a treatment is
successful
15. Schedule of Events
VISIT SITE DIAN DIAN Sat Sat Sat Sat Sat Sat Sat Sat Sat Sat Sat DIAN
PROCEDURE: Visit No V1 V2 V3 V4 V5 V6 V7 V8 V9 V10 V11 V12 V13 V14
Timing (wks.) -4 to 0 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48
Informed consent X
Medical/Treatment History X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
Clinical Assessment X X
Physical/Neurological Exam X X
Vital signs X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
12- lead ECG X X X
Questionnaire(s) X X X X X
Hematology/Chemistry/LFTs/UA X X X X X X
Pregnancy testing (dipstick) X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
Study Therapy Administration X X X X X X X X X X X X X
Cognitive Testing X ? X
PET-PIB X X
F-18 PET X X
Safety MRI X X X
Volumetric MRI X X
Lumbar Puncture (CSF) X X
FDG-PET X X
DIAN = DIAN observational study site location
Sat = Satellite site
16. Inclusion/Exclusion
• -15 before to +10 years after parental age of
onset
• Possible symptomatic or mild dementia
eligible
• Greater than 18 years of age
• Non-carriers who know their mutation status
are not eligible
17. Genetic Testing
• DIAN can pay for discovery testing for
appropriate families or DIAN participants.
• DIAN can pay for Genetic Counseling and
Testing.
• DIAN Coordinators will assist in finding a
genetic counselor in participant’s own area.
• DIAN Coordinator will arrange payment with
the associated billing office.
18. Trial Design Key Points
• Run-in design using DIAN data – Need consistent
DIAN follow-up visits
• DIAN participants will have the first opportunity to
enroll in the trials. DIAN participants will be taken
first as they have baseline data collected
– Others will be welcomed but may need to do DIAN
baseline measurements
• 75% chance of receiving active drug (25% chance of
placebo)
19. Patient Randomization Chart
Brief review and consenting to hear
more details about the study and
possible drug you may receive
Full, detailed review of the study
procedures, office visits, drug therapies
(sign consent)
Assigned to drug treatment or placebo
(blinded to you and the physician).
Begin 22 months of drug therapy.
20. DIAN Trials Grant Resubmission
Reviewers’ concern: Ability to recruit
sufficient numbers of participants
Actions to address concerns
• Show proof of participant numbers and interest
in trials
– Expanded registry
– Site Expansion
– Input from participants (letters of support, survey)
21. DIAN Trials Participant Status
242*
Total Participants Enrolled
(N=estimated based on %)
% Mutation Carriers 63% (N=152)
% eligible for trials
69% (N=105)
Age-range: 15 years before - 10 years after
Note: Goal is 120
the Parental Age at Onset
CDR = 0 46% (N=48)
CDR = 0.5 (prodromal) 36% (N=38)
CDR => 1.0 (dementia) 18% (N=19)
Numbers in parentheses are estimated based on percentage enrolled in DIAN
22. DIAN Trials Next Steps
• DIAN Trials Start-Up: now through end of year
– Grant resubmission: July 5th , 2012
– Protocol design (currently underway): statistical analysis;
participant procedure/assessments selection; final therapy
selection
– FDA Meeting (late summer): meet with the FDA for their
input and approval to proceed with the planned trial
protocol
– Site identification (currently underway): identification of
sites with capabilities, experience, and training in
performing trials in this patient population (neurologists)
– Training of all sites (physicians and nurse coordinators) for
the trial
23. DIAN Trials Next Steps
• DIAN Trials Start-Up: continued
– Ethics / IRB approval at each location (several
months): review board to ensure trial is ethical
and there are no patient safety issues; review
informed consent document
– Participant enrollment into the trial: end of year
through next year
– Participants undergo therapy administration and
procedures to measure the effect of the therapy
25. Questions from Participants
1. Will an individual’s stage of disease (mildly
vs. greatly symptomatic) affect their eligibility
or response to treatment.
2. Do you know what drugs will be used?
3. Do you know what the possible side effects
are?
4. How will the study be administered?
26. Questions continued…
5. How frequent are the study visits?
6. Are we able to have weekend treatments?
7. How long would a person be in a trial?
8. If you know you have the mutation, would
you be able to tell if the drug is working?
9. When will the trials begin?
27. Questions continued…
10.Will the participant continue taking their
current medications (Namenda, Aricept, etc.)
while on the trial drug?
11.If not, how long before the trial drug is
administered should the participant stop
taking their medication?
12.How is it decided which trial drug the
participant is to receive?
28. Questions continued…
13.What side effects of the trial drug should we
(caretakers) be aware of and expect?
14.Due to DIAN site locations vs. participant
locations, have you been able to work out a
system to have participant’s doctor
administer the trial drug?