PARTNERSHIP WITH
LLANGATTOCK COMMUNITY
   WOODLAND GROUP
•Enhance and develop partnership approach with

LCWG

•Set up lease for Beechwood with NPA and deliver on

management in partnership with LCWG

•Agree terms of reference to assist with management

of Glanusk Estate woodland where appropriate
•Support funding application for a Woodland/Volunteer Manager

•Identify Beechwood in Llangattock as potential new site for

Community Woodland

•Did liaise and consider taking on Ty’r Ash on Glanusk Estate

•Have discussed the potential of woodland acreage with Glanusk

Estate
Strengths:-
2.Community involvement – good volunteer base
3.Supports Carbon Negative aims – wood fuel sourced and delivered
locally
4.Long term activity
5.Cross over of management group (AF, JC and SW)
Weaknesses:-
7.Income for LGV limited in fact could cost money
8.Long term activity – needs long term strategy??
Opportunities:-
10.Asset for the community and gives credibility to LGV as a
community based operation
11.Greater volunteer involvement
12.Supports Carbon Negative aims
Threats:-
14.The group is reliant on funding for sustainability
15.The group may no longer wish to work with LGV
16.The group folds
17.No funding available to support administration of the group

3. CEW - Llangattock Green Valleys

  • 1.
  • 2.
    •Enhance and developpartnership approach with LCWG •Set up lease for Beechwood with NPA and deliver on management in partnership with LCWG •Agree terms of reference to assist with management of Glanusk Estate woodland where appropriate
  • 3.
    •Support funding applicationfor a Woodland/Volunteer Manager •Identify Beechwood in Llangattock as potential new site for Community Woodland •Did liaise and consider taking on Ty’r Ash on Glanusk Estate •Have discussed the potential of woodland acreage with Glanusk Estate
  • 4.
    Strengths:- 2.Community involvement –good volunteer base 3.Supports Carbon Negative aims – wood fuel sourced and delivered locally 4.Long term activity 5.Cross over of management group (AF, JC and SW) Weaknesses:- 7.Income for LGV limited in fact could cost money 8.Long term activity – needs long term strategy?? Opportunities:- 10.Asset for the community and gives credibility to LGV as a community based operation 11.Greater volunteer involvement 12.Supports Carbon Negative aims Threats:- 14.The group is reliant on funding for sustainability 15.The group may no longer wish to work with LGV 16.The group folds 17.No funding available to support administration of the group