SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 33
NYSE:DNR
NYSE:DNR
22nd Annual Credit Suisse
Energy Summit
February 15-16, 2017
NYSE:DNR 2
Cautionary Statements
Forward-Looking Statements: The data and/or statements contained in this presentation that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements that involve a number of risks and uncertainties.
Such forward-looking statements may be or may concern, among other things, financial forecasts, future hydrocarbon prices and timing and degree of any price recovery versus the length or severity
of the current commodity price downturn, current or future liquidity sources or their adequacy to support our anticipated future activities, our ability to further reduce our debt levels, possible future
write-downs of oil and natural gas reserves, together with assumptions based on current and projected oil and gas prices and oilfield costs, current or future expectations or estimations of our cash
flows, availability of capital, borrowing capacity, future interest rates, availability of advantageous commodity derivative contracts or the predicted cash flow benefits therefrom, forecasted capital
expenditures, drilling activity or methods, including the timing and location thereof, estimated timing of commencement of CO2 flooding of particular fields or areas, dates of completion of to-be-
constructed industrial plants and the initial date of capture of CO2 from such plants, timing of CO2 injections and initial production responses in tertiary flooding projects, acquisition plans and
proposals and dispositions, development activities, finding costs, anticipated future cost savings, capital budgets, interpretation or prediction of formation details, production rates and volumes or
forecasts thereof, hydrocarbon reserve quantities and values, CO2 reserves and supply and their availability, potential reserves, barrels or percentages of recoverable original oil in place, potential
increases in regional or worldwide tariffs or other trade restrictions, or increased interest rates, the impact of regulatory rulings or changes, anticipated outcomes of pending litigation, prospective
legislation affecting the oil and gas industry, mark-to-market values, competition, long-term forecasts of production, rates of return, estimated costs, estimates of the range of potential insurance
recoveries, changes in costs, future capital expenditures and overall economics, worldwide economic conditions and other variables surrounding our estimated original oil in place, operations and
future plans. Such forward-looking statements generally are accompanied by words such as “plan,” “estimate,” “expect,” “predict,” “forecast,” “to our knowledge,” “anticipate,” “projected,”
“preliminary,” “should,” “assume,” “believe,” “may” or other words that convey, or are intended to convey, the uncertainty of future events or outcomes. Such forward-looking information is based
upon management’s current plans, expectations, estimates, and assumptions and is subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that could significantly and adversely affect current plans,
anticipated actions, the timing of such actions and our financial condition and results of operations. As a consequence, actual results may differ materially from expectations, estimates or
assumptions expressed in or implied by any forward-looking statements made by us or on our behalf. Among the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially are fluctuations in
worldwide oil prices or in U.S. oil prices and consequently in the prices received or demand for our oil and natural gas; decisions as to production levels and/or pricing by OPEC in future periods; levels
of future capital expenditures; effects of our indebtedness; success of our risk management techniques; inaccurate cost estimates; availability of and fluctuations in the prices of goods and services;
the uncertainty of drilling results and reserve estimates; operating hazards and remediation costs; disruption of operations and damages from well incidents, hurricanes, tropical storms, or forest
fires; acquisition risks; requirements for capital or its availability; conditions in the worldwide financial, trade and credit markets; general economic conditions; competition; government regulations,
including tax and environmental; and unexpected delays, as well as the risks and uncertainties inherent in oil and gas drilling and production activities or that are otherwise discussed in this
presentation, including, without limitation, the portions referenced above, and the uncertainties set forth from time to time in our other public reports, filings and public statements including,
without limitation, the Company’s most recent Form 10-K.
Statement Regarding Non-GAAP Financial Measures: This presentation also contains certain non-GAAP financial measures. Any non-GAAP measure included herein is accompanied by a reconciliation
to the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measure along with a statement on why the Company believes the measure is beneficial to investors, which statements are included at the end of this
presentation.
Note to U.S. Investors: Current SEC rules regarding oil and gas reserves information allow oil and gas companies to disclose in filings with the SEC not only proved reserves, but also probable and
possible reserves that meet the SEC’s definitions of such terms. We disclose only proved reserves in our filings with the SEC. Denbury’s proved reserves as of December 31, 2015 and December 31,
2016 were estimated by DeGolyer and MacNaughton, an independent petroleum engineering firm. In this presentation, we may make reference to probable and possible reserves, some of which
have been estimated by our independent engineers and some of which have been estimated by Denbury’s internal staff of engineers. In this presentation, we also may refer to estimates of original
oil in place, resource or reserves “potential”, barrels recoverable, or other descriptions of volumes potentially recoverable, which in addition to reserves generally classifiable as probable and possible
(2P and 3P reserves), include estimates of resources that do not rise to the standards for possible reserves, and which SEC guidelines strictly prohibit us from including in filings with the SEC. These
estimates, as well as the estimates of probable and possible reserves, are by their nature more speculative than estimates of proved reserves and are subject to greater uncertainties, and accordingly
the likelihood of recovering those reserves is subject to substantially greater risk.
NYSE:DNR 3
» CO2 enhanced oil recovery (“CO2 EOR”) is our core focus
» We have uniquely long-lived and lower-risk assets with
extraordinary resource potential
» Owning and controlling the CO2 supply and infrastructure
provides our strategic advantage
» “We bring oil fields back to life!”
Denbury’s Profile:
Over 1,100
miles of CO2
pipelines
EOR Resource Potential
Produced over
155 Million
gross barrels from
EOR to date
A Different Kind of Oil Company
798
Million
Barrels
(net)
~6.5 Tcf
Gross proved
CO2 reserves
As of 12/31/2016
YE 2016 Proved Reserves
254 MMBOE
~97% oil
Preliminary 4Q16
Tertiary Production
37,346
Bbls/d
Preliminary 4Q16
Total Production
60,685
BOE/d
NYSE:DNR 4
CO2 EOR Process
17%
18%
20%
Recovery of
Original Oil in Place
(“OOIP”)
CO2 EOR
(Tertiary)
Secondary
(Waterfloods)
Primary
Remaining oil
(1) Based on OOIP at Denbury’s Little Creek Field
CO2
Oil
Bank
Injected CO2
encounters trapped oil
Oil expands and
moves toward
producing well
CO2 EOR delivers almost as much production as primary or secondary recovery(1)
~
~
~
NYSE:DNR 5
U.S. Lower-48 CO2 EOR Potential
33-83 Billion of Technically
Recoverable Oil(1,2)
(amounts in billions of barrels)
Permian 9-21
East & Central Texas 6-15
Mid-Continent 6-13
California 3-7
South East Gulf Coast 3-7
Rockies 2-6
Other 0-5
Michigan/Illinois 2-4
Williston 1-3
Appalachia 1-2
1) Source: 2013 DOE NETL Next Gen EOR.
2) Total estimated recoveries on a gross basis utilizing CO2 EOR.
Up to 83 Billion Barrels of Technically Recoverable Oil(1)(2)
NYSE:DNR 6
Up to 16 Billion Gross Barrels Recoverable(1)
in Our Two CO2 EOR Target Areas
2.8 to 6.6
Billion Barrels
Estimated Recoverable in
Rocky Mountain Region(2)
Denbury-operated fields represent
~10% of total potential(3)
3.7 to 9.1
Billion Barrels
Estimated Recoverable in
Gulf Coast Region(2)
Existing or Proposed CO2 Source Owned or
Contracted
Existing Denbury CO2 Pipelines
Denbury owned fields
Proposed Denbury CO2 Pipelines
MT ND
TX
MS AL
WY
LA
1) Total estimated recoveries on a gross basis utilizing CO2 EOR, based on a variety of
recovery factors.
2) Source: 2013 DOE NETL Next Gen EOR
3) Using approximate mid-points of ranges, based on a variety of recovery factors.
NYSE:DNR 7
Down-Cycle
Focus
Looking Ahead
Responding to Oil Price Volatility
» Reduce costs
» Optimize business
» Reduce debt
» Preserve cash and liquidity
» Stabilize production and resume growth as oil prices improve
» Continue to improve balance sheet
» Maintain and enhance efficiencies gained through the down-cycle
» Pursue acquisition opportunities
NYSE:DNR 8
$175$60
$10
$55
Tertiary Non-Tertiary CO2 Sources & Other Capitalized Items
2017 Capital Budget & Production Guidance
~$300 Million Total
Spending expected to be
slightly more than currently
estimated cash flow
2017 Development Capital Budget(1)
2017 Production Guidance
62,998 60,000 58,000 - 62,000
2017E
CapEx(1)
~$300 MM
2016
Preliminary
CapEx(3)
~$209 MM
CONTINUING PRODUCTION (BOE/D)(4)
» Expect 2017 full-year production to be
relatively flat with 2016 exit rate on capital
spending of ~$300 million
» Anticipate slight production growth for 2018
based on current assumptions and
expectations
DEVELOPMENT CAPITAL BUDGET
(in MM)
» Primarily focused on expanding existing CO2
floods and other infill opportunities
» Tertiary Projects
• Phase development at Hastings,
Heidelberg, Delhi and Bell Creek
• Conformance work
» Non-Tertiary Projects
• Cedar Creek Anticline
• Other exploitation opportunities
2016
Preliminary
2016
Exit Rate
2017E
1) 2017 development capital budget excludes acquisitions and capitalized interest. 2017 capitalized interest currently estimated at ~$20 million.
2) Includes capitalized internal acquisition, exploration and development costs and pre-production tertiary startup costs.
3) Preliminary 2016 development capital expenditures excluding acquisitions and capitalized interest.
4) Continuing production excludes production for properties sold in 2016. See slide 27 for more detail on continuing production.
(2)
~
NYSE:DNR 9
2016 Reserves Update(1)
Oil
(MMBbl)
Gas
(Bcf)
Total
MMBOE
PV-10
Value(2)
SEC Oil
Pricing(1)
Proved reserves at December 31, 2015 282 38 289 $2.3 Billion $50.28
Revisions of previous estimates (9) 16 (7)
2016 production (22) (6) (23)
Sales of minerals or other revisions (4) (4) (5)
Proved reserves at December 31, 2016 247 44 254 $1.5 Billion $42.75
PDP 177 70%
PDNP 32 12%
PUD 45 18%
Total MMBOE 254 100%
1) Estimated proved reserves and PV-10 Value for year-end 2016 were computed using first-day-of-the-month 12-month average prices of $42.75 per Bbl for oil (based on NYMEX prices) and $2.55 per
million British thermal unit (“MMBtu”) for natural gas (based on Henry Hub cash prices), adjusted for prices received at the field. Comparative prices for year-end 2015 were $50.28 per Bbl of oil and
$2.63 per MMBtu for natural gas, adjusted for prices received at the field.
2) PV-10 Value is an estimated discounted net present value of Denbury’s proved reserves at December 31, 2015 and 2016, before projected income taxes, using a 10% per annum discount rate (a non-
GAAP measure). See the Form 8-K filed February 14, 2017, as well as slide 33 indicating why the Company believes this non-GAAP measure is useful to investors.
NYSE:DNR 10
Gulf Coast Region
Jackson Dome
West Gwinville
Pipeline
Citronelle
(2)
Tinsley
Martinville
Davis
QuitmanHeidelberg
Soso
Sandersville
Eucutta Yellow Creek
Cypress
Creek
Brookhaven
Mallalieu
Little Creek
Olive
Smithdale
McComb
Donaldsonville
Delhi
Cranfield
Lockhart
Crossing
Hastings
Conroe
Oyster Bayou
Thompson
Webster
Pipelines
Denbury Operated Pipelines
Denbury Proposed Pipelines
Free State Pipeline
~90 Miles
Cost: ~$220MM
Green Pipeline
~325 Miles
Conroe(3)
130 MMBbls
Summary(1)
Tertiary Reserves:
Proved
Potential
130
313
Non-Tertiary Reserves:
Proved 22
Total MMBOEs(2)
465
Houston Area(3)
Hastings 30 - 70 MMBbls
Webster 40 - 75 MMBbls
Thompson 20 - 40 MMBbls
Manvel 8 - 12 MMBbls
98 - 197 MMBbls
Oyster Bayou(3)
20 MMBbls
Delhi(3)
30 MMBOEs
Tinsley(3)
25 MMBbls
Heidelberg(3)
30 MMBbls
Mature Area(3)
60 MMBbls
Summerland
Control of CO2 Sources & Pipeline Infrastructure Provides a Strategic Advantage
Manvel
Cumulative Production
15 – 50 MMBoe
50 – 100 MMBoe
> 100 MMBoe
Denbury Owned Fields – Current CO2 Floods
Denbury Owned Fields – Future CO2 Floods
Fields Owned by Others – CO2 EOR Candidates
1) Proved tertiary and non-tertiary oil and natural gas reserves based upon year-end 12/31/16 SEC pricing. Potential includes probable and possible tertiary reserves estimated by the Company as of
12/31/16, using the mid-point of ranges, based upon a variety of recovery factors and long-term oil price assumptions, which also may include estimates of resources that do not rise to the
standards of possible reserves.
2) Total reserves in this table represent total proved plus potential tertiary reserves, using the mid-point of ranges, plus proved non-tertiary reserves, but excluding additional potential related to
non-tertiary exploitation opportunities.
3) Field reserves shown are estimated proved plus potential tertiary reserves.
NYSE:DNR 11
Rocky Mountain Region
MONTANA
NORTH DAKOTA
SOUTH DAKOTA
WYOMING
Elk Basin
Shute
Creek
(XOM)
Lost
Cabin
(COP)
DGC Beulah
Riley
Ridge
(DNR)
Existing CO2
Pipeline
Pipelines & CO2 Sources
Denbury Pipelines
Denbury Proposed Pipelines
Pipelines Owned by Others
Existing or Proposed CO2
Source - Owned or Contracted
Greencore Pipeline
232 Miles
~250 Miles
Cost:~$400MM
~110 Miles
Cost:~$150MM
Bell Creek(3)
20 - 40 MMBbls
Hartzog Draw(3)
30 - 40 MMBbls
Grieve(3)
5 MMBbls
Control of CO2 Sources & Pipeline Infrastructure Provides a Strategic Advantage
August 2016
JV Arrangement(4)
15 – 50 MMBoe
50 – 100 MMBoe
> 100 MMBoe
Denbury Owned Fields – Current CO2 Floods
Denbury Owned Fields – Future CO2 Floods
Fields Owned by Others – CO2 EOR Candidates
Cumulative Production
Gas Draw(3)
10 MMBbls
Summary(1)
Tertiary Reserves:
Proved
Potential
19
336
Non-Tertiary Reserves:
Proved 84
Total MMBOEs(2)
439
1) Proved tertiary and non-tertiary oil and natural gas reserves based upon year-end 12/31/16 SEC pricing. Potential includes probable and possible tertiary reserves estimated by the Company as of
12/31/16, using the mid-point of ranges, based upon a variety of recovery factors and long-term oil price assumptions, which also may include estimates of resources that do not rise to the
standards of possible reserves.
2) Total reserves in this table represent total proved plus potential tertiary reserves, using the mid-point of ranges, plus proved non-tertiary reserves, but excluding additional potential related to
non-tertiary exploitation opportunities.
3) Field reserves shown are estimated proved plus potential tertiary reserves.
4) The JV arrangement provides for the Company’s joint venture partner to fund up to $55 million of the remaining estimated capital to complete development of the facility and fieldwork in
exchange for a 14% higher working interest and a disproportionate sharing of revenue from the first 2 million barrels of production. Currently anticipate production startup by mid-2018.
Cedar Creek Anticline Area(3)
260 - 290 MMBbls
NYSE:DNR 12
Ample CO2 Supply & No Significant Capital Required for Several Years
1) Reported on a gross (8/8th’s) basis.
2) Estimated startup in first quarter 2017. Volumes presented are based upon preliminary projections from Mississippi Power and represent maximum volumes once the power plant is running at full capacity, which is currently
estimated to occur in ~2020.
Gulf Coast CO2 Supply Rocky Mountain CO2 Supply
LaBarge Area
» Estimated field size: 750 square miles
» Estimated recoverable CO2: 100 Tcf
Shute Creek - ExxonMobil Operated
» Proved reserves as of 12/31/16: ~1.2 Tcf
» Denbury has a 1/3 overriding royalty
interest and could receive up to ~115
MMcf/d of CO2 by 2021 at current plant
capacity
Riley Ridge – Denbury Operated
» Future potential source of CO2: ~2.8 Tcf
» Gas processing facility shut-in mid-2014 due
to facility issues and sulfur build-up in gas
supply wells
Lost Cabin – ConocoPhillips Operated
» Denbury could receive up to ~40 MMcf/d of
CO2 at current plant capacity
Jackson Dome
» Proved CO2 reserves as of 12/31/16: ~5.3 Tcf(1)
» Additional probable and possible CO2 reserves
as of 12/31/16: ~1.2 Tcf
» Currently producing at less than 60% of capacity
Industrial-Sourced CO2
» Air Products: hydrogen plant - ~45 MMcf/d
» PCS Nitrogen: ammonia products - ~20 MMcf/d
» Mississippi Power: power plant - ~160
MMcf/d(2)
NYSE:DNR 13
3.03
2.71
2.17
2.70
1.97 2.13 2.17
$-
$0.10
$0.20
$0.30
$0.40
$-
$1.00
$2.00
$3.00
$4.00
1Q15 2Q15 3Q15 4Q15 1Q16 2Q16 3Q16
-
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1Q15 2Q15 3Q15 4Q15 1Q16 2Q16 3Q16
53%
REDUCTION SINCE 1Q15
979
Total Company Injected Volumes (MMcf/d)
CO2CostsperMcfofCO2
1) CO2 costs in 4Q15 include workovers carried out at Jackson Dome of $3 million, or $0.46 per BOE.
(1)
Sustained Improvement in CO2 Efficiency
Industrial-sourced CO2
Jackson Dome CO2
762
678 705
634
459
CO2CostsperBOE
78%
22%
82%
18%
458
35%
REDUCTION YTD
NYSE:DNR 14
YTD 9/30/14 YTD 9/30/15 YTD 9/30/16
G&A - Cash 4.62 4.76 4.04
Interest - Cash 7.25 6.89 7.31
Corporate Total
Production & Ad Valorem Taxes 6.22 3.69 2.93
Marketing Expenses 1.43 1.52 1.74
LOE 24.51 19.98 17.29
Field Level Total
Continued Improvement of Cash Operating Costs
FIELD LEVEL
CASH COSTS
CORPORATE
CASH COSTS
10%
REDUCTION
YTD 2016 vs. YTD 2015
$/BOE
$44.03
(1)
11.87 11.65
32.16 25.19 21.96
$33.31
24%
REDUCTION
YTD 2016 vs. YTD 2014
(2)
(1)(3)
Note: The numbers presented within this table may not agree to per-BOE data presented in our consolidated financial statements due to certain amounts not settled in cash.
1) Amounts presented exclude stock compensation.
2) Amounts include capitalized interest for all periods presented. In addition, interest expense for YTD 2016 includes interest on our new 9% Senior Secured Notes, accounted for as debt for financial reporting purposes.
3) Amounts in YTD 2015 exclude a reimbursement for a retroactive utility rate adjustment ($10 MM) and an insurance reimbursement for previous well control costs ($4 MM).
4) Amounts exclude derivative settlements.
Avg. Realized Price per BOE(4)
11.35
$36.84
88.79 69.51 44.35
NYSE:DNR 15
Peer
A
Peer
B
Peer
C
Peer
D
Peer
E
DNR
Peer
F
Peer
G
Peer
H
Peer
I
Peer
J
Peer
K
Peer
L
Peer
M
Peer
N
Peer
O
Operating Margin per BOE 23.25 22.86 22.18 21.39 21.11 18.39 18.24 18.04 18.02 16.53 16.18 15.41 14.33 13.03 12.47 5.90
Lifting Cost per BOE 7.36 8.26 13.26 7.85 5.31 23.99 10.37 11.78 11.77 9.62 11.06 7.15 19.07 7.95 10.78 7.26
Revenue per BOE 30.61 31.12 35.44 29.24 26.42 42.38 28.61 29.82 29.79 26.15 27.24 22.56 33.40 20.98 23.25 13.16
$-
$5
$10
$15
$20
$25
Competitive Operating Margin
Source: Bloomberg and Company filings for period ended 9/30/2016. Peers include CLR, COP, CRC, CXO, DVN, MRO, MUR, NBL, NFX, OAS, OXY, PXD, RRC, SM, and WLL.
1) Operating margin calculated as revenues less lifting costs.
2) Lifting cost calculated as lease operating expenses, marketing/transportation expenses and production and ad valorem taxes.
3) Revenues exclude gain/loss on derivative settlements.
Peer Average
Highest revenue per BOE in the peer group
3Q16 Peer Operating Margins ($/BOE)
(1)
(2)
(3)
NYSE:DNR 16
Bank Credit Facility:
» $715 million in liquidity
as of 9/30/16
» Basket for $1 billion of
junior lien debt ($615
million issued to date)
» No near-term covenant
concerns at current strip
prices
Debt Reductions:
» 17% reduction in total
debt principal since YE15
» 23% reduction in total
debt principal since YE14
$562 Million – Total Debt Principal Reduction in 2016
Ample Liquidity & No Near-Term Maturities(1)
$260
$215
$715
$615
$773
$622
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
$2,748
$3,310 $(443)
12/31/15
Total Debt
Principal
9/30/16
Total Debt
Principal(2)
Open-Market
Debt
Purchases
(net)
Change in Bank
Revolver &
Other
Debt
Exchanges
(net)
$(105)
$(14)
2021
$1,050
Undrawn
& Available
Drawn
Sr. Subordinated NotesSr. Secured Bank Credit Facility Sr. Secured Second Lien Notes
2.8% 6.375% 5.50% 4.625%9%
LC’s
Ample Liquidity & Significant Debt Reductions
Borrowing Base
12/31/14
Total Debt
Principal
$3,571
$ In millions
$ In millions
(1) All balances presented as of 9/30/16.
(2) Excludes $255 million of future interest payable on the
9% Senior Secured Second Lien Notes due 2021
accounted for as debt for financial reporting purposes.
NYSE:DNR 17
Oil Hedge Protection
1) Averages are volume weighted.
2) If oil prices were to average less than the sold put price, receipts on settlement would be limited to the difference between the floor price and sold put price.
Detail as of February 13, 2017 1Q17 2Q17 3Q17 4Q17
Swaps
WTI NYMEX
Fixed-Price
Swaps
Volumes Hedged (Bbls/d) 22,000 22,000 — —
Swap Price(1) $42.67 $43.99 — —
Argus LLS
Fixed-Price
Swaps
Volumes Hedged (Bbls/d) 10,000 7,000 — —
Swap Price(1) $43.77 $45.35 — —
Collars
WTI NYMEX
Collars
Volumes Hedged (Bbls/d) 4,000 — — 1,000
Floor/Ceiling Price(1) $40/$54.80 — — $40/$70
WTI NYMEX
3-Way Collars
Volumes Hedged (Bbls/d) — — 14,500 11,000
Sold Put Price/Floor/Ceiling Price(1)(2) — — $30/$40/$69.09 $30/$40/$69.67
Argus LLS
Collars
Volumes Hedged (Bbls/d) 3,000 — — —
Floor/Ceiling Price(1) $40/$57.23 — — —
Argus LLS
3-Way Collars
Volumes Hedged (Bbls/d) — — 2,000 1,000
Sold Put Price/Floor/Ceiling Price(1)(2) — — $31/$41/$69.25 $31/$41/$70.25
Total Volumes Hedged 39,000 29,000 16,500 13,000
NYSE:DNR 18
Delhi NGL Plant
Key benefits:
» Extracts NGLs from our gas stream to be sold
separately
» Improves the Delhi flood with a purer CO2
recycle stream
» Self-generates power using extracted methane
Delhi Field
Plant in service late December 2016
Delhi Field
2016 CapEx: ~$55 million
NYSE:DNR 19
Looking Ahead
Our Advantages
Key Takeaways
Long-Term Visibility
» CO2 EOR is a proven process
» Long-lived and lower-risk assets
» Tremendous resource potential
Capital Flexibility
» Relatively low capital intensity
» Able to adjust to the oil price environment
Competitive Advantages
» Large inventory of oil fields
» Strategic CO2 supply and over 1,100 miles of CO2 pipelines
» Stabilize production and resume growth as oil prices improve
» Continue to improve balance sheet
» Maintain and enhance efficiencies gained through the down-cycle
» Pursue acquisition opportunities
Appendix
NYSE:DNR 21
CO2 EOR is a Proven Process
Significant CO2 Supply by Region
Gulf Coast Region
» Jackson Dome, MS (Denbury Resources)
» Port Arthur, TX (Denbury Resources)
» Geismar, LA (Denbury Resources)
» Mississippi Power (Denbury Resources)
Permian Basin Region
» Bravo Dome, NM (Kinder Morgan, Occidental)
» McElmo Dome, CO (ExxonMobil, Kinder Morgan)
» Sheep Mountain, CO (ExxonMobil, Occidental)
Rocky Mountain Region
» LaBarge, WY (ExxonMobil, Denbury Resources)
» Lost Cabin, WY (ConocoPhillips)
Canada
» Dakota Gasification (Cenovus, Apache)
Significant CO2 EOR Operators by Region
Gulf Coast Region
» Denbury Resources
Permian Basin Region
» Occidental » Kinder Morgan
Rocky Mountain Region
» Denbury Resources
» Devon
» FDL
» Chevron
Canada
» Cenovus » Apache
Jackson
Dome
Bravo Dome
LaBarge
Lost Cabin
DGC
McElmo Dome
Naturally Occurring CO2 Source
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
MBbls/d
Gulf Coast/Other
Mid-Continent
Rocky Mountains
Permian Basin
CO2 EOR Oil Production by Region(1)
1) Source: Advanced Resources International
2) Estimated startup in 2017.
Industrial-Sourced CO2
Port
Arthur
Geismar
MS Power(2)
Sheep Mountain
NYSE:DNR 22
Actual Industry Recovery Curves
Range of
Recovery
10%-18%
• An auditor’s view, Mike Stell, Ryder Scott, Permian Basin Study Group, April 4, 2011
• Reserve booking guidelines, Mike Stell, Ryder Scott, CO2 Conference, Midland December 8, 2005
• What is important in the reservoir, Richard Baker, Appega Conference, April 22, 2004
NYSE:DNR 23
Actual Curves – Denbury Mature Fields
Range of
Recovery
11%-20+%
NYSE:DNR 24
Debt Structure
Debt ($ in millions) 12/31/2015
Open-Market
Debt
Purchases Other
Debt
Exchanges(1) 6/30/2016
Open-Market
Debt
Purchases Other 9/30/2016
Senior Secured Bank Credit Facility 175 55 90 — 320 21 (81) 260
9% Senior Secured Second Lien Notes due 2021 — — — 615 615 — — 615
Total senior secured debt 175 55 90 615 935 21 (81) 875
6⅜% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2021 400 (4) — (175) 221 (6) — 215
5½% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2022 1,250 (42) — (411) 797 (24) — 773
4⅝% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2023 1,200 (106) — (472) 622 — — 622
Other subordinated notes 2 — — — 2 — — 2
Total subordinated debt 2,852 (152) — (1,058) 1,642 (30) — 1,612
Pipeline financings 212 — (4) — 208 — (3) 205
Capital lease obligations 71 — (11) — 60 — (4) 56
Total principal balance 3,310 (97) 75 (443) 2,845 (9) (88) 2,748
Future interest payable on 9% Senior Secured
Second Lien Notes due 2021(2)
— — — 255 255 — — 255
Issuance costs on senior subordinated notes (32) 2 1 11 (18) — 1 (17)
Total debt, net of debt issuance costs on
senior subordinated notes
3,278 (95) 76 (177) 3,082 (9) (87) 2,986
1) Included in the exchange were 40.7 million shares of Denbury common stock.
2) Represents future interest payable on the 9% Senior Secured Second Lien Notes due 2021 accounted for as debt for financial reporting purposes.
Total Debt Principal Reduction YTD $562 million
NYSE:DNR 25
$0
$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
$300
$350
YE2015
Bank Facility
Ending
Balance
Changes in
Working &
Accrued
Capital
Note
Repurchases
3Q16
Bank Facility
Ending
Balance
$175
$260
$56
$(77)
Capital Lease
Payments
& Other
Adjusted
Cash Flow
From
Operations(1),
Net of CapEx(2)
$(67)
(In millions)
YE2016
Bank Facility
Estimated
Ending
Balance
$275 - $300
1) Cash flow from operations before working capital changes (a non-GAAP measure). See press release attached as Exhibit 99.1 to the Form 8-K filed November 3, 2016 for additional information.
2) Includes development capital expenditures ($146 million), acquisitions ($11 million) and capitalized interest ($19 million).
3) Represents proceeds realized (after closing adjustments) from the Williston asset sale and other minor property divestitures during the period.
YTD 2016 Change in Bank Credit Facility
$(32)
Proceeds
From Asset
Divestitures(3)
$35
Adjusted Cash Flow(1) $211
CapEx(2) $(176)
Total $35
NYSE:DNR 26
Commitments & borrowing base $1.05 billion
Redetermination Semi-annually – May 1st and November 1st
Maturity date December 9, 2019
Permitted bond repurchases Up to $225 million of bond repurchases (~$148 million remaining as of 9/30/2016)
Junior lien debt
Allows for the incurrence of up to $1 billion of junior lien debt (subject to customary
requirements) ($615 million issued to date as of 9/30/2016)
Anti-hoarding provisions If > $250 million borrowed, unrestricted cash held in accounts is limited to $225 million
Pricing grid
Senior Secured Bank Credit Facility Info
Financial Covenants 2016 2017
2018
2019Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Total net debt to EBITDAX (max)(1) N/A N/A 6.0x 5.5x 5.0x 5.0x 4.25x
Senior secured debt(2) to EBITDAX (max) 3.0x 3.0x N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
EBITDAX to interest charges (min) 1.25x 1.25x N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Current ratio (min) 1.0x 1.0x 1.0x 1.0x 1.0x 1.0x 1.0x
Utilization
Based
Libor margin
(bps)
ABR margin
(bps)
Undrawn
pricing (bps)
X >90% 300 200 50
>=75% X <90% 275 175 50
>=50% X <75% 250 150 50
>=25% X <50% 225 125 50
X <25% 200 100 50
1) For purposes of the total net debt to EBITDAX calculation, EBITDAX will be annualized for each of the first three quarters of 2018, building to a full trailing twelve months by the fourth quarter of 2018.
2) Based solely on bank debt.
NYSE:DNR 27
Preliminary Production by Area
Average Daily Production (BOE/d)
Field 2014 1Q15 2Q15 3Q15 4Q15 2015 1Q16 2Q16 3Q16 4Q16 2016
Mature area(1) 11,817 10,801 11,170 10,946 10,403 10,830 9,666 9,415 8,653 8,440 9,040
Delhi(2) 4,340 3,551 3,623 3,676 3,898 3,688 3,971 3,996 4,262 4,387 4,155
Hastings 4,777 4,694 5,350 5,114 5,082 5,061 5,068 4,972 4,729 4,552 4,829
Heidelberg 5,707 6,027 5,885 5,600 5,635 5,785 5,346 5,246 5,000 4,924 5,128
Oyster Bayou 4,683 5,861 5,936 5,962 5,831 5,898 5,494 5,088 4,767 4,988 5,083
Tinsley 8,507 8,928 8,740 7,311 7,522 8,119 7,899 7,335 6,756 6,786 7,192
Bell Creek 1,248 1,965 1,880 2,225 2,806 2,221 3,020 3,160 3,032 3,269 3,121
Total tertiary production 41,079 41,827 42,584 40,834 41,177 41,602 40,464 39,212 37,199 37,346 38,548
Gulf Coast non-tertiary 9,138 8,797 8,153 8,511 8,647 8,526 7,370 5,577 5,735 6,457 6,284
Cedar Creek Anticline 18,834 18,522 18,089 17,515 17,875 17,997 17,778 16,325 16,017 15,186 16,322
Other Rockies non-tertiary 3,106 3,107 2,872 2,593 2,407 2,743 2,070 1,862 1,763 1,696 1,844
Total non-tertiary production 31,078 30,426 29,114 28,619 28,929 29,266 27,218 23,764 23,515 23,339 24,450
Total continuing production 72,157 72,253 71,698 69,453 70,106 70,868 67,682 62,976 60,714 60,685 62,998
Williston assets(3) 1,744 1,643 1,561 1,522 1,473 1,549 1,364 1,267 819 --- 864
Other property divestitures 531 460 457 435 423 444 305 263 --- --- 141
Total production 74,432 74,356 73,716 71,410 72,002 72,861 69,351 64,506 61,533 60,685 64,003
1) Mature area includes Brookhaven, Cranfield, Eucutta, Little Creek, Lockhart Crossing, Mallalieu, Martinville, McComb, and Soso fields.
2) Beginning with the fourth quarter of 2014, average daily Delhi Field production amounts reflect the reversionary assignment of approximately 25% of our interest in that field effective November 1, 2014.
3) Includes non-tertiary production in the Rocky Mountain region related to the sale of remaining non-core assets in the Williston Basin of North Dakota and Montana, which closed in the third quarter of 2016.
NYSE:DNR 28
NYMEX Oil Differential Summary
Crude Oil Differentials
$ per barrel 2013 2014 1Q15 2Q15 3Q15 4Q15 2015 1Q16 2Q16 3Q16
Tertiary Oil Fields
Gulf Coast Region $7.86 $2.11 $(0.22) $2.04 $0.98 $(0.97) $0.60 $(1.95) $(0.98) $(0.82)
Rocky Mountain Region (14.24) (11.10) (2.09) (2.81) (1.30) (1.81) (2.74) (3.09) (2.43) (2.01)
Gulf Coast Non-Tertiary 4.47 (0.28) (0.71) 0.68 0.58 (0.34) (0.19) (1.95) (3.16) (0.36)
Cedar Creek Anticline (7.45) (9.78) (7.95) (6.48) (4.55) (3.08) (5.49) (4.82) (3.77) (2.90)
Other Rockies Non-Tertiary (10.97) (12.03) (9.84) (8.48) (8.10) (6.91) (8.12) (8.90) (7.66) (6.33)
Denbury Totals $2.62 $(2.21) $(2.81) $(0.89) $(0.96) $(1.74) $(1.55) $(3.02) $(2.18) $(1.57)
NYSE:DNR 29
Analysis of Total Operating Costs
Total Operating Costs $/BOE
2013 2014 1Q15 2Q15 3Q15 4Q15 2015 1Q16 2Q16 3Q16
CO2 Costs $3.73 $3.79 $3.03 $2.71 $2.17 $2.70(1) $2.66 $1.97 $2.13 $2.17
Power & Fuel 5.36 5.93 5.88 5.28 5.77 5.43 5.59 5.26 5.02 5.39
Labor & Overhead 5.59 5.44 5.45 5.33 5.25 5.23 5.31 5.09 5.22 5.44
Repairs & Maintenance 1.33 1.45 1.44 1.22 1.27 1.41 1.33 0.80 0.73 0.98
Chemicals 1.61 1.37 1.14 1.23 1.11 1.08 1.14 0.97 0.90 1.18
Workovers 4.74 4.23 2.71 2.41 2.31 2.16 2.40 1.22 1.99 2.02
Other 1.69 1.89 1.43 1.44 1.33 1.30 1.38 0.92 1.05 1.05
Total Normalized LOE(2) $24.05 $24.10 $21.08 $19.62 $19.21 $19.31 $19.81 $16.23 $17.04 $18.23
Special or Unusual Items(3) 4.45 (0.26) --- --- (2.09) --- (0.51) --- --- ---
Thompson Field Repair Costs(4) --- --- --- 0.08 0.22 --- 0.07 --- --- 0.59
Total LOE $28.50 $23.84 $21.08 $19.70 $17.34 $19.31 $19.37 $16.23 $17.04 $18.82
Oil Pricing
NYMEX Oil Price $98.05 $92.95 $48.83 $57.81 $46.70 $42.15 $48.85 $33.73 $45.56 $45.02
Realized Oil Price(5) $100.67 $90.74 $46.02 $56.92 $45.74 $40.41 $47.30 $30.71 $43.38 $43.45
1) CO2 costs in 4Q15 include workovers carried out at Jackson Dome of $3 million, or $0.46 per BOE.
2) Normalized LOE excludes special or unusual items and Thompson Field repair costs (see footnote 3 and 4 below), but includes $12MM of workover expenses at Riley Ridge during 2014.
3) Special or unusual items consist of Delhi remediation charges of $114MM in 2013, Delhi remediation charges, net of insurance reimbursements of ($7MM) in 2014, and a reimbursement for a retroactive
utility rate adjustment ($10MM) and an insurance reimbursement for previous well control costs ($4MM) in 3Q15.
4) Represents repair costs to return Thompson Field to production following weather-related flooding in 2Q16 and 2Q15.
5) Excludes derivative settlements.
NYSE:DNR 30
Analysis of Tertiary Operating Costs
Tertiary Operating Costs $/Bbl
2013 2014 1Q15 2Q15 3Q15 4Q15 2015 1Q16 2Q16 3Q16
CO2 Costs $6.82 $6.87 $5.39 $4.69 $3.79 $4.72(1) $4.65 $3.38 $3.51 $3.59
Power & Fuel 6.64 7.46 7.30 6.27 6.81 6.53 6.72 5.98 5.62 6.08
Labor & Overhead 4.95 5.04 5.03 4.89 4.60 4.72 4.81 4.54 4.18 4.45
Repairs & Maintenance 0.98 0.90 1.15 0.86 0.97 1.09 1.02 0.71 0.77 0.83
Chemicals 1.64 1.36 1.07 1.24 1.03 1.06 1.10 0.96 1.06 1.26
Workovers 4.03 3.15 2.06 2.00 1.73 1.61 1.85 0.85 2.04 1.55
Other 0.45 0.90 0.70 0.57 0.69 0.52 0.62 0.47 0.50 0.31
Total Normalized LOE(2) $25.51 $25.68 $22.70 $20.52 $19.62 $20.25 $20.77 $16.89 $17.68 $18.07
Special or Unusual Items(3) 8.12 (0.47) --- --- (3.64) --- (0.90) --- --- ---
Total LOE $33.63 $25.21 $22.70 $20.52 $15.98 $20.25 $19.87 $16.89 $17.68 $18.07
Oil Pricing
NYMEX Oil Price $98.05 $92.95 $48.83 $57.81 $46.70 $42.15 $48.85 $33.73 $45.56 $45.02
Realized Oil Price $105.88 $94.65 $48.52 $59.63 $47.56 $41.13 $49.27 $31.70 $44.46 $44.10
1) CO2 costs in 4Q15 include workovers carried out at Jackson Dome of $3 million, or $0.80 per Bbl.
2) Normalized LOE excludes special or unusual items. See (3) below.
3) Special or unusual items consist of Delhi remediation charges of $114MM in 2013, Delhi remediation charges, net of insurance reimbursements of ($7MM) in 2014, and a
reimbursement for a retroactive utility rate adjustment ($10MM) and an insurance reimbursement for previous well control costs ($4MM) in 3Q15.
NYSE:DNR 31
CO2 Cost & NYMEX Oil Price
Q1 13 Q2 13 Q3 13 Q4 13 Q1 14 Q2 14 Q3 14 Q4 14 Q1 15 Q2 15 Q3 15 Q4 15 Q1 16 Q2 16 Q3 16
Tax 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.042 0.047 0.045
Purchases 0.24 0.22 0.27 0.27 0.23 0.28 0.26 0.19 0.16 0.16 0.15 0.15 0.146 0.204 0.187
OPEX 0.07 0.1 0.08 0.1 0.1 0.11 0.1 0.1 0.11 0.13 0.12 0.17 0.112 0.128 0.12
NYMEX Crude Oil Price 94.42 94.14 105.94 97.57 98.6 103.07 97.31 73.04 48.83 57.99 46.7 42.15 33.73 45.56 45.02
$0
$10
$20
$30
$40
$50
$60
$70
$80
$90
$100
$110
$0.00
$0.05
$0.10
$0.15
$0.20
$0.25
$0.30
$0.35
$0.40
$0.45
$0.50
$0.55
NYMEXCrudeOilPrice/Bbl
CO2Costs/Mcf
OPEX Purchases Tax NYMEX Crude Oil Price
(2)
(1)
Industrial-Sourced CO2 %
1) Excludes DD&A on CO2 wells and facilities; includes Gulf Coast & Rocky Mountain industrial-source CO2 costs.
2) CO2 costs in 4Q15 include workovers carried out at Jackson Dome of $3 million, or $0.05 per Mcf.
2Q131Q13 4Q133Q13 2Q141Q14 4Q143Q14 2Q151Q15 4Q153Q15 1Q16 2Q16 3Q16
4% 10% 14%12% 16%14% 15%15% 22%18% 23%22% 23% 25% 22%
NYSE:DNR 32
Non-GAAP Measures
Reconciliation of net loss (GAAP measure) to adjusted cash flows from operations (non-GAAP measure) to cash
flows from operations (GAAP measure)
Adjusted cash flows from operations is a non-GAAP measure that represents cash flows provided by operations before changes in assets
and liabilities, as summarized from the Company’s Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. Adjusted cash flows
from operations measures the cash flows earned or incurred from operating activities without regard to the collection or payment of
associated receivables or payables. Management believes that it is important to consider this additional measure, along with cash flows
from operations, as it believes the non-GAAP measure can often be a better way to discuss changes in operating trends in its business
caused by changes in production, prices, operating costs and related factors, without regard to whether the earned or incurred item was
collected or paid during that period.
2015 2016
In millions Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3
Net loss (GAAP measure) $(108) $(1,148) $(2,244) $(885) $(185) $(381) $(25)
Adjustments to reconcile to adjusted cash flows from operations
Depletion, depreciation, and amortization 150 148 121 112 77 67 55
Deferred income taxes (66) (634) (732) (500) (95) (223) (14)
Stock-based compensation 8 7 8 8 1 3 6
Noncash fair value adjustments on commodity derivatives 65 173 69 57 95 150 (29)
Gain on debt extinguishment - - - - (95) (12) (8)
Write-down of oil and natural gas properties 146 1,706 1,761 1,327 256 479 76
Impairment of goodwill - - 1,262 - - - -
Other - - (2) 10 3 10 1
Adjusted cash flows from operations (non-GAAP measure) $195 $252 $243 $129 $57 $93 $62
Net change in assets and liabilities relating to operations (57) 37 30 36 (55) (32) 34
Cash flows from operations (GAAP measure) $138 $289 $273 $165 $2 $61 $96
NYSE:DNR 33
Non-GAAP Measures (Cont.)
Reconciliation of the preliminary standardized measure of discounted estimated future net cash flows after income
taxes (GAAP measure) to PV-10 Value (non-GAAP measure)
PV-10 Value is a non-GAAP measure and is different from the Standardized Measure in that PV-10 Value is a pre-tax number and the
Standardized Measure is an after-tax number. Denbury’s 2015 and 2016 year-end estimated proved oil and natural gas reserves were
prepared by the independent reservoir engineering firm of DeGolyer and MacNaughton. The information used to calculate PV-10 Value is
derived directly from data determined in accordance with FASC Topic 932. Management believes PV-10 Value is a useful supplemental
disclosure to the Standardized Measure because the Standardized Measure can be impacted by a company’s unique tax situation, and it is
not practical to calculate the Standardized Measure on a property-by-property basis. Because of this, PV-10 Value is a widely used
measure within the industry and is commonly used by securities analysts, banks and credit rating agencies to evaluate the estimated
future net cash flows from proved reserves on a comparative basis across companies or specific properties. PV-10 Value is commonly used
by management and others in the industry to evaluate properties that are bought and sold, to assess the potential return on investment in
the Company’s oil and natural gas properties, and to perform impairment testing of oil and natural gas properties. PV-10 Value is not a
measure of financial or operating performance under GAAP, nor should it be considered in isolation or as a substitute for the Standardized
Measure. PV-10 Value and the preliminary Standardized Measure do not purport to represent the fair value of the Company’s oil and
natural gas reserves.
December 31,
In millions 2015 2016
Preliminary Standardized Measure (GAAP measure) $1,890 $1,399
Discounted estimated future income tax 429 143
PV-10 Value (non-GAAP measure) $2,319 $1,542

More Related Content

What's hot

Denbury 3 q17-earnings
Denbury 3 q17-earningsDenbury 3 q17-earnings
Denbury 3 q17-earningsDenbury
 
2 q17 earnings presentation final
2 q17 earnings presentation final2 q17 earnings presentation final
2 q17 earnings presentation finalDenbury
 
April 2017 corporate presentation
April 2017 corporate presentationApril 2017 corporate presentation
April 2017 corporate presentationDenbury
 
June investor presentation 6.5.17
June investor presentation 6.5.17June investor presentation 6.5.17
June investor presentation 6.5.17SandRidgeIR
 
First Quarter 2017 Earnings Presentation
First Quarter 2017 Earnings Presentation First Quarter 2017 Earnings Presentation
First Quarter 2017 Earnings Presentation Denbury
 
Denbury 3rd Quarter 2016 Earnings Presentation
Denbury 3rd Quarter 2016 Earnings PresentationDenbury 3rd Quarter 2016 Earnings Presentation
Denbury 3rd Quarter 2016 Earnings PresentationDenbury
 
Final august investor presentation
Final august investor presentationFinal august investor presentation
Final august investor presentationSandRidgeIR
 
Ubs conference-5 26-16
Ubs conference-5 26-16Ubs conference-5 26-16
Ubs conference-5 26-16Denbury
 
Company website presentation (c) february 2017
Company website presentation (c)   february 2017Company website presentation (c)   february 2017
Company website presentation (c) february 2017AnteroResources
 
EnerCom’s The Oil and Gas Conference 21 Presentation
EnerCom’s The Oil and Gas Conference 21 PresentationEnerCom’s The Oil and Gas Conference 21 Presentation
EnerCom’s The Oil and Gas Conference 21 PresentationApproachResources
 
Company website presentation november 2016
Company website presentation   november 2016Company website presentation   november 2016
Company website presentation november 2016AnteroResources
 
AREX 2Q 2016 Earnings Results Presentation
AREX 2Q 2016 Earnings Results PresentationAREX 2Q 2016 Earnings Results Presentation
AREX 2Q 2016 Earnings Results PresentationApproachResources
 
Enercom presentation final
Enercom presentation finalEnercom presentation final
Enercom presentation finalDenbury
 

What's hot (20)

Denbury 3 q17-earnings
Denbury 3 q17-earningsDenbury 3 q17-earnings
Denbury 3 q17-earnings
 
2 q17 earnings presentation final
2 q17 earnings presentation final2 q17 earnings presentation final
2 q17 earnings presentation final
 
April 2017 corporate presentation
April 2017 corporate presentationApril 2017 corporate presentation
April 2017 corporate presentation
 
June investor presentation 6.5.17
June investor presentation 6.5.17June investor presentation 6.5.17
June investor presentation 6.5.17
 
Eog 0817
Eog 0817Eog 0817
Eog 0817
 
First Quarter 2017 Earnings Presentation
First Quarter 2017 Earnings Presentation First Quarter 2017 Earnings Presentation
First Quarter 2017 Earnings Presentation
 
Denbury 3rd Quarter 2016 Earnings Presentation
Denbury 3rd Quarter 2016 Earnings PresentationDenbury 3rd Quarter 2016 Earnings Presentation
Denbury 3rd Quarter 2016 Earnings Presentation
 
November Investor Presentation
November Investor PresentationNovember Investor Presentation
November Investor Presentation
 
Final august investor presentation
Final august investor presentationFinal august investor presentation
Final august investor presentation
 
Ubs conference-5 26-16
Ubs conference-5 26-16Ubs conference-5 26-16
Ubs conference-5 26-16
 
Company website presentation (c) february 2017
Company website presentation (c)   february 2017Company website presentation (c)   february 2017
Company website presentation (c) february 2017
 
EnerCom’s The Oil and Gas Conference 21 Presentation
EnerCom’s The Oil and Gas Conference 21 PresentationEnerCom’s The Oil and Gas Conference 21 Presentation
EnerCom’s The Oil and Gas Conference 21 Presentation
 
Barclays CEO Energy Conference
Barclays CEO Energy ConferenceBarclays CEO Energy Conference
Barclays CEO Energy Conference
 
Johnson Rice Energy Conference
Johnson Rice Energy ConferenceJohnson Rice Energy Conference
Johnson Rice Energy Conference
 
Company website presentation november 2016
Company website presentation   november 2016Company website presentation   november 2016
Company website presentation november 2016
 
Eog sb 0916
Eog sb 0916Eog sb 0916
Eog sb 0916
 
JP Morgan Energy Conference
JP Morgan Energy ConferenceJP Morgan Energy Conference
JP Morgan Energy Conference
 
AREX 2Q 2016 Earnings Results Presentation
AREX 2Q 2016 Earnings Results PresentationAREX 2Q 2016 Earnings Results Presentation
AREX 2Q 2016 Earnings Results Presentation
 
CHK 2016 Analyst Day
CHK 2016 Analyst DayCHK 2016 Analyst Day
CHK 2016 Analyst Day
 
Enercom presentation final
Enercom presentation finalEnercom presentation final
Enercom presentation final
 

Viewers also liked

Credit suisse conference presentation february 2017 v-f
Credit suisse conference presentation   february 2017 v-fCredit suisse conference presentation   february 2017 v-f
Credit suisse conference presentation february 2017 v-fAnteroResources
 
Startuplab
StartuplabStartuplab
StartuplabJedu Kim
 
Q4 2016-presentation
Q4 2016-presentationQ4 2016-presentation
Q4 2016-presentationcpir2016ir
 
Resumen público pm y monitoreo - Garruchos, Grupo Insud 2016
Resumen público pm y monitoreo - Garruchos, Grupo Insud 2016Resumen público pm y monitoreo - Garruchos, Grupo Insud 2016
Resumen público pm y monitoreo - Garruchos, Grupo Insud 2016Pomera
 
Glaukos investor presentation January
Glaukos investor presentation January Glaukos investor presentation January
Glaukos investor presentation January glaukos
 
Pgem q3 2016 earnings slides final
Pgem q3 2016 earnings slides finalPgem q3 2016 earnings slides final
Pgem q3 2016 earnings slides finalinvestorplygem
 
2016 Q4 call slides
2016 Q4 call slides2016 Q4 call slides
2016 Q4 call slidesinvitaeir
 
Celp investor presentation march 2017 final
Celp investor presentation march 2017 finalCelp investor presentation march 2017 final
Celp investor presentation march 2017 finalCypressEnergy
 
17.7 falco presentation bmo
17.7 falco presentation   bmo17.7 falco presentation   bmo
17.7 falco presentation bmoFalcoCorporate
 
Porter's 5 force model(oil & gas sector)
Porter's 5 force model(oil & gas sector)Porter's 5 force model(oil & gas sector)
Porter's 5 force model(oil & gas sector)Saurabh Agarwal
 
Q4 fy 2016 earnings presentation final
Q4 fy 2016 earnings presentation finalQ4 fy 2016 earnings presentation final
Q4 fy 2016 earnings presentation finalMyers_Investors
 
Katietrailerstitles
KatietrailerstitlesKatietrailerstitles
Katietrailerstitlesbir
 
Company website presentation january 2016
Company website presentation   january 2016 Company website presentation   january 2016
Company website presentation january 2016 AnteroResources
 
Company website presentation march 2016
Company website presentation   march 2016Company website presentation   march 2016
Company website presentation march 2016AnteroResources
 
Ciudadanos de una aldea global
Ciudadanos de una aldea global  Ciudadanos de una aldea global
Ciudadanos de una aldea global Fundación Impuls
 
January 2017 Real Estate Market Report, The Woodlands, TX
January 2017 Real Estate Market Report, The Woodlands, TXJanuary 2017 Real Estate Market Report, The Woodlands, TX
January 2017 Real Estate Market Report, The Woodlands, TXReferred Realty Group
 
Practica de word
Practica de wordPractica de word
Practica de wordGaby Cuesta
 

Viewers also liked (20)

Credit suisse conference presentation february 2017 v-f
Credit suisse conference presentation   february 2017 v-fCredit suisse conference presentation   february 2017 v-f
Credit suisse conference presentation february 2017 v-f
 
Eog 0217
Eog 0217Eog 0217
Eog 0217
 
logo
logologo
logo
 
Startuplab
StartuplabStartuplab
Startuplab
 
Q4 2016-presentation
Q4 2016-presentationQ4 2016-presentation
Q4 2016-presentation
 
Resumen público pm y monitoreo - Garruchos, Grupo Insud 2016
Resumen público pm y monitoreo - Garruchos, Grupo Insud 2016Resumen público pm y monitoreo - Garruchos, Grupo Insud 2016
Resumen público pm y monitoreo - Garruchos, Grupo Insud 2016
 
مقرر 13201 - الفرقة الثانية - الدرس العملي الرابع
مقرر 13201 - الفرقة الثانية -  الدرس العملي الرابع مقرر 13201 - الفرقة الثانية -  الدرس العملي الرابع
مقرر 13201 - الفرقة الثانية - الدرس العملي الرابع
 
Glaukos investor presentation January
Glaukos investor presentation January Glaukos investor presentation January
Glaukos investor presentation January
 
Pgem q3 2016 earnings slides final
Pgem q3 2016 earnings slides finalPgem q3 2016 earnings slides final
Pgem q3 2016 earnings slides final
 
2016 Q4 call slides
2016 Q4 call slides2016 Q4 call slides
2016 Q4 call slides
 
Celp investor presentation march 2017 final
Celp investor presentation march 2017 finalCelp investor presentation march 2017 final
Celp investor presentation march 2017 final
 
17.7 falco presentation bmo
17.7 falco presentation   bmo17.7 falco presentation   bmo
17.7 falco presentation bmo
 
Porter's 5 force model(oil & gas sector)
Porter's 5 force model(oil & gas sector)Porter's 5 force model(oil & gas sector)
Porter's 5 force model(oil & gas sector)
 
Q4 fy 2016 earnings presentation final
Q4 fy 2016 earnings presentation finalQ4 fy 2016 earnings presentation final
Q4 fy 2016 earnings presentation final
 
Katietrailerstitles
KatietrailerstitlesKatietrailerstitles
Katietrailerstitles
 
Company website presentation january 2016
Company website presentation   january 2016 Company website presentation   january 2016
Company website presentation january 2016
 
Company website presentation march 2016
Company website presentation   march 2016Company website presentation   march 2016
Company website presentation march 2016
 
Ciudadanos de una aldea global
Ciudadanos de una aldea global  Ciudadanos de una aldea global
Ciudadanos de una aldea global
 
January 2017 Real Estate Market Report, The Woodlands, TX
January 2017 Real Estate Market Report, The Woodlands, TXJanuary 2017 Real Estate Market Report, The Woodlands, TX
January 2017 Real Estate Market Report, The Woodlands, TX
 
Practica de word
Practica de wordPractica de word
Practica de word
 

Similar to 2017 credit suisse final

2017 12 capital one conference final
2017 12 capital one conference final2017 12 capital one conference final
2017 12 capital one conference finalDenbury
 
2017 february corporate presentation final
2017 february corporate presentation  final2017 february corporate presentation  final
2017 february corporate presentation finalDenbury
 
2018 credit suisse presentation final
2018 credit suisse presentation final2018 credit suisse presentation final
2018 credit suisse presentation finalDenbury
 
Jp morgan 2017 global high yield leveraged finance conference final
Jp morgan 2017 global high yield leveraged finance conference finalJp morgan 2017 global high yield leveraged finance conference final
Jp morgan 2017 global high yield leveraged finance conference finalDenbury
 
1 q18 earnings presentation final
1 q18 earnings presentation final1 q18 earnings presentation final
1 q18 earnings presentation finalDenbury
 
4 q17 earnings presentation final
4 q17 earnings presentation final4 q17 earnings presentation final
4 q17 earnings presentation finalDenny2015ir
 
Ipaa 2018 oil and gas investment symposium
Ipaa 2018 oil and gas investment symposiumIpaa 2018 oil and gas investment symposium
Ipaa 2018 oil and gas investment symposiumDenbury
 
June corporate presentation final
June corporate presentation finalJune corporate presentation final
June corporate presentation finalDenbury
 
J.p.morgan 2018 energy conference final
J.p.morgan 2018 energy conference finalJ.p.morgan 2018 energy conference final
J.p.morgan 2018 energy conference finalDenbury
 
August 2016 corporate_presentation_final Eclipse resources
August 2016 corporate_presentation_final Eclipse resourcesAugust 2016 corporate_presentation_final Eclipse resources
August 2016 corporate_presentation_final Eclipse resourcesSteve Wittrig
 
Rex Energy Corporate Presentation May 2013 - Including Upper Devonian Details
Rex Energy Corporate Presentation May 2013 - Including Upper Devonian DetailsRex Energy Corporate Presentation May 2013 - Including Upper Devonian Details
Rex Energy Corporate Presentation May 2013 - Including Upper Devonian DetailsMarcellus Drilling News
 
Rex Energy Latest Company Presentation - Feb 2015
Rex Energy Latest Company Presentation - Feb 2015Rex Energy Latest Company Presentation - Feb 2015
Rex Energy Latest Company Presentation - Feb 2015Marcellus Drilling News
 
Magnum Hunter Resources Investor Presentation Sept 2013
Magnum Hunter Resources Investor Presentation Sept 2013Magnum Hunter Resources Investor Presentation Sept 2013
Magnum Hunter Resources Investor Presentation Sept 2013Marcellus Drilling News
 
Rex Energy Investor Presentation May 2015
Rex Energy Investor Presentation May 2015Rex Energy Investor Presentation May 2015
Rex Energy Investor Presentation May 2015Marcellus Drilling News
 
Range Resources Company Presentation Oct 29, 2013
Range Resources Company Presentation Oct 29, 2013Range Resources Company Presentation Oct 29, 2013
Range Resources Company Presentation Oct 29, 2013Marcellus Drilling News
 
Range Resources Presentation at UBS Global Oil & Gas Conference
Range Resources Presentation at UBS Global Oil & Gas ConferenceRange Resources Presentation at UBS Global Oil & Gas Conference
Range Resources Presentation at UBS Global Oil & Gas ConferenceMarcellus Drilling News
 
May 2013 Chesapeake Energy Investor Presentation
May 2013 Chesapeake Energy Investor PresentationMay 2013 Chesapeake Energy Investor Presentation
May 2013 Chesapeake Energy Investor PresentationMarcellus Drilling News
 
2013 04 ir presentation
2013 04 ir presentation2013 04 ir presentation
2013 04 ir presentationDenbury
 
CIBC Whistler Institutional Investor Conference
CIBC Whistler Institutional Investor ConferenceCIBC Whistler Institutional Investor Conference
CIBC Whistler Institutional Investor ConferenceTeckResourcesLtd
 
Range Resources Company Presentation - Oct 28, 2015
Range Resources Company Presentation - Oct 28, 2015Range Resources Company Presentation - Oct 28, 2015
Range Resources Company Presentation - Oct 28, 2015Marcellus Drilling News
 

Similar to 2017 credit suisse final (20)

2017 12 capital one conference final
2017 12 capital one conference final2017 12 capital one conference final
2017 12 capital one conference final
 
2017 february corporate presentation final
2017 february corporate presentation  final2017 february corporate presentation  final
2017 february corporate presentation final
 
2018 credit suisse presentation final
2018 credit suisse presentation final2018 credit suisse presentation final
2018 credit suisse presentation final
 
Jp morgan 2017 global high yield leveraged finance conference final
Jp morgan 2017 global high yield leveraged finance conference finalJp morgan 2017 global high yield leveraged finance conference final
Jp morgan 2017 global high yield leveraged finance conference final
 
1 q18 earnings presentation final
1 q18 earnings presentation final1 q18 earnings presentation final
1 q18 earnings presentation final
 
4 q17 earnings presentation final
4 q17 earnings presentation final4 q17 earnings presentation final
4 q17 earnings presentation final
 
Ipaa 2018 oil and gas investment symposium
Ipaa 2018 oil and gas investment symposiumIpaa 2018 oil and gas investment symposium
Ipaa 2018 oil and gas investment symposium
 
June corporate presentation final
June corporate presentation finalJune corporate presentation final
June corporate presentation final
 
J.p.morgan 2018 energy conference final
J.p.morgan 2018 energy conference finalJ.p.morgan 2018 energy conference final
J.p.morgan 2018 energy conference final
 
August 2016 corporate_presentation_final Eclipse resources
August 2016 corporate_presentation_final Eclipse resourcesAugust 2016 corporate_presentation_final Eclipse resources
August 2016 corporate_presentation_final Eclipse resources
 
Rex Energy Corporate Presentation May 2013 - Including Upper Devonian Details
Rex Energy Corporate Presentation May 2013 - Including Upper Devonian DetailsRex Energy Corporate Presentation May 2013 - Including Upper Devonian Details
Rex Energy Corporate Presentation May 2013 - Including Upper Devonian Details
 
Rex Energy Latest Company Presentation - Feb 2015
Rex Energy Latest Company Presentation - Feb 2015Rex Energy Latest Company Presentation - Feb 2015
Rex Energy Latest Company Presentation - Feb 2015
 
Magnum Hunter Resources Investor Presentation Sept 2013
Magnum Hunter Resources Investor Presentation Sept 2013Magnum Hunter Resources Investor Presentation Sept 2013
Magnum Hunter Resources Investor Presentation Sept 2013
 
Rex Energy Investor Presentation May 2015
Rex Energy Investor Presentation May 2015Rex Energy Investor Presentation May 2015
Rex Energy Investor Presentation May 2015
 
Range Resources Company Presentation Oct 29, 2013
Range Resources Company Presentation Oct 29, 2013Range Resources Company Presentation Oct 29, 2013
Range Resources Company Presentation Oct 29, 2013
 
Range Resources Presentation at UBS Global Oil & Gas Conference
Range Resources Presentation at UBS Global Oil & Gas ConferenceRange Resources Presentation at UBS Global Oil & Gas Conference
Range Resources Presentation at UBS Global Oil & Gas Conference
 
May 2013 Chesapeake Energy Investor Presentation
May 2013 Chesapeake Energy Investor PresentationMay 2013 Chesapeake Energy Investor Presentation
May 2013 Chesapeake Energy Investor Presentation
 
2013 04 ir presentation
2013 04 ir presentation2013 04 ir presentation
2013 04 ir presentation
 
CIBC Whistler Institutional Investor Conference
CIBC Whistler Institutional Investor ConferenceCIBC Whistler Institutional Investor Conference
CIBC Whistler Institutional Investor Conference
 
Range Resources Company Presentation - Oct 28, 2015
Range Resources Company Presentation - Oct 28, 2015Range Resources Company Presentation - Oct 28, 2015
Range Resources Company Presentation - Oct 28, 2015
 

More from Denbury

2013 05 ir presentation - new template
2013 05 ir presentation - new template2013 05 ir presentation - new template
2013 05 ir presentation - new templateDenbury
 
2013 05 ir presentation - 1 q13 earnings final-v001_x4807e
2013 05 ir presentation - 1 q13 earnings final-v001_x4807e2013 05 ir presentation - 1 q13 earnings final-v001_x4807e
2013 05 ir presentation - 1 q13 earnings final-v001_x4807eDenbury
 
2013 04 ir presentation ipaa
2013 04 ir presentation ipaa2013 04 ir presentation ipaa
2013 04 ir presentation ipaaDenbury
 
Fall Analyst Presentation
Fall Analyst PresentationFall Analyst Presentation
Fall Analyst PresentationDenbury
 
Corporate Presentation - October 2012
Corporate Presentation - October 2012Corporate Presentation - October 2012
Corporate Presentation - October 2012Denbury
 
October Corporate Presentation
October Corporate PresentationOctober Corporate Presentation
October Corporate PresentationDenbury
 

More from Denbury (6)

2013 05 ir presentation - new template
2013 05 ir presentation - new template2013 05 ir presentation - new template
2013 05 ir presentation - new template
 
2013 05 ir presentation - 1 q13 earnings final-v001_x4807e
2013 05 ir presentation - 1 q13 earnings final-v001_x4807e2013 05 ir presentation - 1 q13 earnings final-v001_x4807e
2013 05 ir presentation - 1 q13 earnings final-v001_x4807e
 
2013 04 ir presentation ipaa
2013 04 ir presentation ipaa2013 04 ir presentation ipaa
2013 04 ir presentation ipaa
 
Fall Analyst Presentation
Fall Analyst PresentationFall Analyst Presentation
Fall Analyst Presentation
 
Corporate Presentation - October 2012
Corporate Presentation - October 2012Corporate Presentation - October 2012
Corporate Presentation - October 2012
 
October Corporate Presentation
October Corporate PresentationOctober Corporate Presentation
October Corporate Presentation
 

Recently uploaded

9654467111 Low Rate Call Girls In Tughlakabad, Delhi NCR
9654467111 Low Rate Call Girls In Tughlakabad, Delhi NCR9654467111 Low Rate Call Girls In Tughlakabad, Delhi NCR
9654467111 Low Rate Call Girls In Tughlakabad, Delhi NCRSapana Sha
 
Methanex Investor Presentation (April 2024)
Methanex Investor Presentation (April 2024)Methanex Investor Presentation (April 2024)
Methanex Investor Presentation (April 2024)Methanex Corporation
 
WheelTug PLC Pitch Deck | Investor Insights | April 2024
WheelTug PLC Pitch Deck | Investor Insights | April 2024WheelTug PLC Pitch Deck | Investor Insights | April 2024
WheelTug PLC Pitch Deck | Investor Insights | April 2024Hector Del Castillo, CPM, CPMM
 
VIP Kolkata Call Girl Rishra 👉 8250192130 Available With Room
VIP Kolkata Call Girl Rishra 👉 8250192130  Available With RoomVIP Kolkata Call Girl Rishra 👉 8250192130  Available With Room
VIP Kolkata Call Girl Rishra 👉 8250192130 Available With Roomdivyansh0kumar0
 
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd - Corporate Presentation, April 23, 2024
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd - Corporate Presentation, April 23, 2024Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd - Corporate Presentation, April 23, 2024
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd - Corporate Presentation, April 23, 2024Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd
 
9654467111 Call Girls In Katwaria Sarai Short 1500 Night 6000
9654467111 Call Girls In Katwaria Sarai Short 1500 Night 60009654467111 Call Girls In Katwaria Sarai Short 1500 Night 6000
9654467111 Call Girls In Katwaria Sarai Short 1500 Night 6000Sapana Sha
 
The Concept of Humanity in Islam and its effects at future of humanity
The Concept of Humanity in Islam and its effects at future of humanityThe Concept of Humanity in Islam and its effects at future of humanity
The Concept of Humanity in Islam and its effects at future of humanityJohanAspro
 
如何办理东俄勒冈大学毕业证(文凭)EOU学位证书
如何办理东俄勒冈大学毕业证(文凭)EOU学位证书如何办理东俄勒冈大学毕业证(文凭)EOU学位证书
如何办理东俄勒冈大学毕业证(文凭)EOU学位证书Fir La
 
No 1 AMil Baba In Islamabad No 1 Amil Baba In Lahore No 1 Amil Baba In Faisl...
No 1 AMil Baba In Islamabad  No 1 Amil Baba In Lahore No 1 Amil Baba In Faisl...No 1 AMil Baba In Islamabad  No 1 Amil Baba In Lahore No 1 Amil Baba In Faisl...
No 1 AMil Baba In Islamabad No 1 Amil Baba In Lahore No 1 Amil Baba In Faisl...First NO1 World Amil baba in Faisalabad
 
如何办理(UTS毕业证书)悉尼科技大学毕业证学位证书
如何办理(UTS毕业证书)悉尼科技大学毕业证学位证书如何办理(UTS毕业证书)悉尼科技大学毕业证学位证书
如何办理(UTS毕业证书)悉尼科技大学毕业证学位证书Fis s
 
《加州大学圣克鲁兹分校学位证书复制》Q微信741003700美国学历疑难问题指南|挂科被加州大学圣克鲁兹分校劝退没有毕业证怎么办?《UCSC毕业证购买|加...
《加州大学圣克鲁兹分校学位证书复制》Q微信741003700美国学历疑难问题指南|挂科被加州大学圣克鲁兹分校劝退没有毕业证怎么办?《UCSC毕业证购买|加...《加州大学圣克鲁兹分校学位证书复制》Q微信741003700美国学历疑难问题指南|挂科被加州大学圣克鲁兹分校劝退没有毕业证怎么办?《UCSC毕业证购买|加...
《加州大学圣克鲁兹分校学位证书复制》Q微信741003700美国学历疑难问题指南|挂科被加州大学圣克鲁兹分校劝退没有毕业证怎么办?《UCSC毕业证购买|加...wyqazy
 
定制(UWIC毕业证书)英国卡迪夫城市大学毕业证成绩单原版一比一
定制(UWIC毕业证书)英国卡迪夫城市大学毕业证成绩单原版一比一定制(UWIC毕业证书)英国卡迪夫城市大学毕业证成绩单原版一比一
定制(UWIC毕业证书)英国卡迪夫城市大学毕业证成绩单原版一比一Fir La
 
如何办理北卡罗来纳大学教堂山分校毕业证(文凭)UNC学位证书
如何办理北卡罗来纳大学教堂山分校毕业证(文凭)UNC学位证书如何办理北卡罗来纳大学教堂山分校毕业证(文凭)UNC学位证书
如何办理北卡罗来纳大学教堂山分校毕业证(文凭)UNC学位证书Fir La
 
Cyberagent_For New Investors_EN_240424.pdf
Cyberagent_For New Investors_EN_240424.pdfCyberagent_For New Investors_EN_240424.pdf
Cyberagent_For New Investors_EN_240424.pdfCyberAgent, Inc.
 

Recently uploaded (20)

9654467111 Low Rate Call Girls In Tughlakabad, Delhi NCR
9654467111 Low Rate Call Girls In Tughlakabad, Delhi NCR9654467111 Low Rate Call Girls In Tughlakabad, Delhi NCR
9654467111 Low Rate Call Girls In Tughlakabad, Delhi NCR
 
Methanex Investor Presentation (April 2024)
Methanex Investor Presentation (April 2024)Methanex Investor Presentation (April 2024)
Methanex Investor Presentation (April 2024)
 
young call girls in Govindpuri 🔝 9953056974 🔝 Delhi escort Service
young call girls in Govindpuri 🔝 9953056974 🔝 Delhi escort Serviceyoung call girls in Govindpuri 🔝 9953056974 🔝 Delhi escort Service
young call girls in Govindpuri 🔝 9953056974 🔝 Delhi escort Service
 
Escort Service Call Girls In Shalimar Bagh, 99530°56974 Delhi NCR
Escort Service Call Girls In Shalimar Bagh, 99530°56974 Delhi NCREscort Service Call Girls In Shalimar Bagh, 99530°56974 Delhi NCR
Escort Service Call Girls In Shalimar Bagh, 99530°56974 Delhi NCR
 
WheelTug PLC Pitch Deck | Investor Insights | April 2024
WheelTug PLC Pitch Deck | Investor Insights | April 2024WheelTug PLC Pitch Deck | Investor Insights | April 2024
WheelTug PLC Pitch Deck | Investor Insights | April 2024
 
young call girls in Hauz Khas,🔝 9953056974 🔝 escort Service
young call girls in Hauz Khas,🔝 9953056974 🔝 escort Serviceyoung call girls in Hauz Khas,🔝 9953056974 🔝 escort Service
young call girls in Hauz Khas,🔝 9953056974 🔝 escort Service
 
VIP Kolkata Call Girl Rishra 👉 8250192130 Available With Room
VIP Kolkata Call Girl Rishra 👉 8250192130  Available With RoomVIP Kolkata Call Girl Rishra 👉 8250192130  Available With Room
VIP Kolkata Call Girl Rishra 👉 8250192130 Available With Room
 
young call girls in Yamuna Vihar 🔝 9953056974 🔝 Delhi escort Service
young  call girls in   Yamuna Vihar 🔝 9953056974 🔝 Delhi escort Serviceyoung  call girls in   Yamuna Vihar 🔝 9953056974 🔝 Delhi escort Service
young call girls in Yamuna Vihar 🔝 9953056974 🔝 Delhi escort Service
 
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd - Corporate Presentation, April 23, 2024
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd - Corporate Presentation, April 23, 2024Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd - Corporate Presentation, April 23, 2024
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd - Corporate Presentation, April 23, 2024
 
9654467111 Call Girls In Katwaria Sarai Short 1500 Night 6000
9654467111 Call Girls In Katwaria Sarai Short 1500 Night 60009654467111 Call Girls In Katwaria Sarai Short 1500 Night 6000
9654467111 Call Girls In Katwaria Sarai Short 1500 Night 6000
 
The Concept of Humanity in Islam and its effects at future of humanity
The Concept of Humanity in Islam and its effects at future of humanityThe Concept of Humanity in Islam and its effects at future of humanity
The Concept of Humanity in Islam and its effects at future of humanity
 
Model Call Girl in Udyog Vihar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
Model Call Girl in Udyog Vihar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝Model Call Girl in Udyog Vihar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
Model Call Girl in Udyog Vihar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
 
如何办理东俄勒冈大学毕业证(文凭)EOU学位证书
如何办理东俄勒冈大学毕业证(文凭)EOU学位证书如何办理东俄勒冈大学毕业证(文凭)EOU学位证书
如何办理东俄勒冈大学毕业证(文凭)EOU学位证书
 
No 1 AMil Baba In Islamabad No 1 Amil Baba In Lahore No 1 Amil Baba In Faisl...
No 1 AMil Baba In Islamabad  No 1 Amil Baba In Lahore No 1 Amil Baba In Faisl...No 1 AMil Baba In Islamabad  No 1 Amil Baba In Lahore No 1 Amil Baba In Faisl...
No 1 AMil Baba In Islamabad No 1 Amil Baba In Lahore No 1 Amil Baba In Faisl...
 
如何办理(UTS毕业证书)悉尼科技大学毕业证学位证书
如何办理(UTS毕业证书)悉尼科技大学毕业证学位证书如何办理(UTS毕业证书)悉尼科技大学毕业证学位证书
如何办理(UTS毕业证书)悉尼科技大学毕业证学位证书
 
《加州大学圣克鲁兹分校学位证书复制》Q微信741003700美国学历疑难问题指南|挂科被加州大学圣克鲁兹分校劝退没有毕业证怎么办?《UCSC毕业证购买|加...
《加州大学圣克鲁兹分校学位证书复制》Q微信741003700美国学历疑难问题指南|挂科被加州大学圣克鲁兹分校劝退没有毕业证怎么办?《UCSC毕业证购买|加...《加州大学圣克鲁兹分校学位证书复制》Q微信741003700美国学历疑难问题指南|挂科被加州大学圣克鲁兹分校劝退没有毕业证怎么办?《UCSC毕业证购买|加...
《加州大学圣克鲁兹分校学位证书复制》Q微信741003700美国学历疑难问题指南|挂科被加州大学圣克鲁兹分校劝退没有毕业证怎么办?《UCSC毕业证购买|加...
 
定制(UWIC毕业证书)英国卡迪夫城市大学毕业证成绩单原版一比一
定制(UWIC毕业证书)英国卡迪夫城市大学毕业证成绩单原版一比一定制(UWIC毕业证书)英国卡迪夫城市大学毕业证成绩单原版一比一
定制(UWIC毕业证书)英国卡迪夫城市大学毕业证成绩单原版一比一
 
如何办理北卡罗来纳大学教堂山分校毕业证(文凭)UNC学位证书
如何办理北卡罗来纳大学教堂山分校毕业证(文凭)UNC学位证书如何办理北卡罗来纳大学教堂山分校毕业证(文凭)UNC学位证书
如何办理北卡罗来纳大学教堂山分校毕业证(文凭)UNC学位证书
 
Cyberagent_For New Investors_EN_240424.pdf
Cyberagent_For New Investors_EN_240424.pdfCyberagent_For New Investors_EN_240424.pdf
Cyberagent_For New Investors_EN_240424.pdf
 
Falcon Invoice Discounting - Best Platform
Falcon Invoice Discounting - Best PlatformFalcon Invoice Discounting - Best Platform
Falcon Invoice Discounting - Best Platform
 

2017 credit suisse final

  • 1. NYSE:DNR NYSE:DNR 22nd Annual Credit Suisse Energy Summit February 15-16, 2017
  • 2. NYSE:DNR 2 Cautionary Statements Forward-Looking Statements: The data and/or statements contained in this presentation that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements that involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Such forward-looking statements may be or may concern, among other things, financial forecasts, future hydrocarbon prices and timing and degree of any price recovery versus the length or severity of the current commodity price downturn, current or future liquidity sources or their adequacy to support our anticipated future activities, our ability to further reduce our debt levels, possible future write-downs of oil and natural gas reserves, together with assumptions based on current and projected oil and gas prices and oilfield costs, current or future expectations or estimations of our cash flows, availability of capital, borrowing capacity, future interest rates, availability of advantageous commodity derivative contracts or the predicted cash flow benefits therefrom, forecasted capital expenditures, drilling activity or methods, including the timing and location thereof, estimated timing of commencement of CO2 flooding of particular fields or areas, dates of completion of to-be- constructed industrial plants and the initial date of capture of CO2 from such plants, timing of CO2 injections and initial production responses in tertiary flooding projects, acquisition plans and proposals and dispositions, development activities, finding costs, anticipated future cost savings, capital budgets, interpretation or prediction of formation details, production rates and volumes or forecasts thereof, hydrocarbon reserve quantities and values, CO2 reserves and supply and their availability, potential reserves, barrels or percentages of recoverable original oil in place, potential increases in regional or worldwide tariffs or other trade restrictions, or increased interest rates, the impact of regulatory rulings or changes, anticipated outcomes of pending litigation, prospective legislation affecting the oil and gas industry, mark-to-market values, competition, long-term forecasts of production, rates of return, estimated costs, estimates of the range of potential insurance recoveries, changes in costs, future capital expenditures and overall economics, worldwide economic conditions and other variables surrounding our estimated original oil in place, operations and future plans. Such forward-looking statements generally are accompanied by words such as “plan,” “estimate,” “expect,” “predict,” “forecast,” “to our knowledge,” “anticipate,” “projected,” “preliminary,” “should,” “assume,” “believe,” “may” or other words that convey, or are intended to convey, the uncertainty of future events or outcomes. Such forward-looking information is based upon management’s current plans, expectations, estimates, and assumptions and is subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that could significantly and adversely affect current plans, anticipated actions, the timing of such actions and our financial condition and results of operations. As a consequence, actual results may differ materially from expectations, estimates or assumptions expressed in or implied by any forward-looking statements made by us or on our behalf. Among the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially are fluctuations in worldwide oil prices or in U.S. oil prices and consequently in the prices received or demand for our oil and natural gas; decisions as to production levels and/or pricing by OPEC in future periods; levels of future capital expenditures; effects of our indebtedness; success of our risk management techniques; inaccurate cost estimates; availability of and fluctuations in the prices of goods and services; the uncertainty of drilling results and reserve estimates; operating hazards and remediation costs; disruption of operations and damages from well incidents, hurricanes, tropical storms, or forest fires; acquisition risks; requirements for capital or its availability; conditions in the worldwide financial, trade and credit markets; general economic conditions; competition; government regulations, including tax and environmental; and unexpected delays, as well as the risks and uncertainties inherent in oil and gas drilling and production activities or that are otherwise discussed in this presentation, including, without limitation, the portions referenced above, and the uncertainties set forth from time to time in our other public reports, filings and public statements including, without limitation, the Company’s most recent Form 10-K. Statement Regarding Non-GAAP Financial Measures: This presentation also contains certain non-GAAP financial measures. Any non-GAAP measure included herein is accompanied by a reconciliation to the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measure along with a statement on why the Company believes the measure is beneficial to investors, which statements are included at the end of this presentation. Note to U.S. Investors: Current SEC rules regarding oil and gas reserves information allow oil and gas companies to disclose in filings with the SEC not only proved reserves, but also probable and possible reserves that meet the SEC’s definitions of such terms. We disclose only proved reserves in our filings with the SEC. Denbury’s proved reserves as of December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2016 were estimated by DeGolyer and MacNaughton, an independent petroleum engineering firm. In this presentation, we may make reference to probable and possible reserves, some of which have been estimated by our independent engineers and some of which have been estimated by Denbury’s internal staff of engineers. In this presentation, we also may refer to estimates of original oil in place, resource or reserves “potential”, barrels recoverable, or other descriptions of volumes potentially recoverable, which in addition to reserves generally classifiable as probable and possible (2P and 3P reserves), include estimates of resources that do not rise to the standards for possible reserves, and which SEC guidelines strictly prohibit us from including in filings with the SEC. These estimates, as well as the estimates of probable and possible reserves, are by their nature more speculative than estimates of proved reserves and are subject to greater uncertainties, and accordingly the likelihood of recovering those reserves is subject to substantially greater risk.
  • 3. NYSE:DNR 3 » CO2 enhanced oil recovery (“CO2 EOR”) is our core focus » We have uniquely long-lived and lower-risk assets with extraordinary resource potential » Owning and controlling the CO2 supply and infrastructure provides our strategic advantage » “We bring oil fields back to life!” Denbury’s Profile: Over 1,100 miles of CO2 pipelines EOR Resource Potential Produced over 155 Million gross barrels from EOR to date A Different Kind of Oil Company 798 Million Barrels (net) ~6.5 Tcf Gross proved CO2 reserves As of 12/31/2016 YE 2016 Proved Reserves 254 MMBOE ~97% oil Preliminary 4Q16 Tertiary Production 37,346 Bbls/d Preliminary 4Q16 Total Production 60,685 BOE/d
  • 4. NYSE:DNR 4 CO2 EOR Process 17% 18% 20% Recovery of Original Oil in Place (“OOIP”) CO2 EOR (Tertiary) Secondary (Waterfloods) Primary Remaining oil (1) Based on OOIP at Denbury’s Little Creek Field CO2 Oil Bank Injected CO2 encounters trapped oil Oil expands and moves toward producing well CO2 EOR delivers almost as much production as primary or secondary recovery(1) ~ ~ ~
  • 5. NYSE:DNR 5 U.S. Lower-48 CO2 EOR Potential 33-83 Billion of Technically Recoverable Oil(1,2) (amounts in billions of barrels) Permian 9-21 East & Central Texas 6-15 Mid-Continent 6-13 California 3-7 South East Gulf Coast 3-7 Rockies 2-6 Other 0-5 Michigan/Illinois 2-4 Williston 1-3 Appalachia 1-2 1) Source: 2013 DOE NETL Next Gen EOR. 2) Total estimated recoveries on a gross basis utilizing CO2 EOR. Up to 83 Billion Barrels of Technically Recoverable Oil(1)(2)
  • 6. NYSE:DNR 6 Up to 16 Billion Gross Barrels Recoverable(1) in Our Two CO2 EOR Target Areas 2.8 to 6.6 Billion Barrels Estimated Recoverable in Rocky Mountain Region(2) Denbury-operated fields represent ~10% of total potential(3) 3.7 to 9.1 Billion Barrels Estimated Recoverable in Gulf Coast Region(2) Existing or Proposed CO2 Source Owned or Contracted Existing Denbury CO2 Pipelines Denbury owned fields Proposed Denbury CO2 Pipelines MT ND TX MS AL WY LA 1) Total estimated recoveries on a gross basis utilizing CO2 EOR, based on a variety of recovery factors. 2) Source: 2013 DOE NETL Next Gen EOR 3) Using approximate mid-points of ranges, based on a variety of recovery factors.
  • 7. NYSE:DNR 7 Down-Cycle Focus Looking Ahead Responding to Oil Price Volatility » Reduce costs » Optimize business » Reduce debt » Preserve cash and liquidity » Stabilize production and resume growth as oil prices improve » Continue to improve balance sheet » Maintain and enhance efficiencies gained through the down-cycle » Pursue acquisition opportunities
  • 8. NYSE:DNR 8 $175$60 $10 $55 Tertiary Non-Tertiary CO2 Sources & Other Capitalized Items 2017 Capital Budget & Production Guidance ~$300 Million Total Spending expected to be slightly more than currently estimated cash flow 2017 Development Capital Budget(1) 2017 Production Guidance 62,998 60,000 58,000 - 62,000 2017E CapEx(1) ~$300 MM 2016 Preliminary CapEx(3) ~$209 MM CONTINUING PRODUCTION (BOE/D)(4) » Expect 2017 full-year production to be relatively flat with 2016 exit rate on capital spending of ~$300 million » Anticipate slight production growth for 2018 based on current assumptions and expectations DEVELOPMENT CAPITAL BUDGET (in MM) » Primarily focused on expanding existing CO2 floods and other infill opportunities » Tertiary Projects • Phase development at Hastings, Heidelberg, Delhi and Bell Creek • Conformance work » Non-Tertiary Projects • Cedar Creek Anticline • Other exploitation opportunities 2016 Preliminary 2016 Exit Rate 2017E 1) 2017 development capital budget excludes acquisitions and capitalized interest. 2017 capitalized interest currently estimated at ~$20 million. 2) Includes capitalized internal acquisition, exploration and development costs and pre-production tertiary startup costs. 3) Preliminary 2016 development capital expenditures excluding acquisitions and capitalized interest. 4) Continuing production excludes production for properties sold in 2016. See slide 27 for more detail on continuing production. (2) ~
  • 9. NYSE:DNR 9 2016 Reserves Update(1) Oil (MMBbl) Gas (Bcf) Total MMBOE PV-10 Value(2) SEC Oil Pricing(1) Proved reserves at December 31, 2015 282 38 289 $2.3 Billion $50.28 Revisions of previous estimates (9) 16 (7) 2016 production (22) (6) (23) Sales of minerals or other revisions (4) (4) (5) Proved reserves at December 31, 2016 247 44 254 $1.5 Billion $42.75 PDP 177 70% PDNP 32 12% PUD 45 18% Total MMBOE 254 100% 1) Estimated proved reserves and PV-10 Value for year-end 2016 were computed using first-day-of-the-month 12-month average prices of $42.75 per Bbl for oil (based on NYMEX prices) and $2.55 per million British thermal unit (“MMBtu”) for natural gas (based on Henry Hub cash prices), adjusted for prices received at the field. Comparative prices for year-end 2015 were $50.28 per Bbl of oil and $2.63 per MMBtu for natural gas, adjusted for prices received at the field. 2) PV-10 Value is an estimated discounted net present value of Denbury’s proved reserves at December 31, 2015 and 2016, before projected income taxes, using a 10% per annum discount rate (a non- GAAP measure). See the Form 8-K filed February 14, 2017, as well as slide 33 indicating why the Company believes this non-GAAP measure is useful to investors.
  • 10. NYSE:DNR 10 Gulf Coast Region Jackson Dome West Gwinville Pipeline Citronelle (2) Tinsley Martinville Davis QuitmanHeidelberg Soso Sandersville Eucutta Yellow Creek Cypress Creek Brookhaven Mallalieu Little Creek Olive Smithdale McComb Donaldsonville Delhi Cranfield Lockhart Crossing Hastings Conroe Oyster Bayou Thompson Webster Pipelines Denbury Operated Pipelines Denbury Proposed Pipelines Free State Pipeline ~90 Miles Cost: ~$220MM Green Pipeline ~325 Miles Conroe(3) 130 MMBbls Summary(1) Tertiary Reserves: Proved Potential 130 313 Non-Tertiary Reserves: Proved 22 Total MMBOEs(2) 465 Houston Area(3) Hastings 30 - 70 MMBbls Webster 40 - 75 MMBbls Thompson 20 - 40 MMBbls Manvel 8 - 12 MMBbls 98 - 197 MMBbls Oyster Bayou(3) 20 MMBbls Delhi(3) 30 MMBOEs Tinsley(3) 25 MMBbls Heidelberg(3) 30 MMBbls Mature Area(3) 60 MMBbls Summerland Control of CO2 Sources & Pipeline Infrastructure Provides a Strategic Advantage Manvel Cumulative Production 15 – 50 MMBoe 50 – 100 MMBoe > 100 MMBoe Denbury Owned Fields – Current CO2 Floods Denbury Owned Fields – Future CO2 Floods Fields Owned by Others – CO2 EOR Candidates 1) Proved tertiary and non-tertiary oil and natural gas reserves based upon year-end 12/31/16 SEC pricing. Potential includes probable and possible tertiary reserves estimated by the Company as of 12/31/16, using the mid-point of ranges, based upon a variety of recovery factors and long-term oil price assumptions, which also may include estimates of resources that do not rise to the standards of possible reserves. 2) Total reserves in this table represent total proved plus potential tertiary reserves, using the mid-point of ranges, plus proved non-tertiary reserves, but excluding additional potential related to non-tertiary exploitation opportunities. 3) Field reserves shown are estimated proved plus potential tertiary reserves.
  • 11. NYSE:DNR 11 Rocky Mountain Region MONTANA NORTH DAKOTA SOUTH DAKOTA WYOMING Elk Basin Shute Creek (XOM) Lost Cabin (COP) DGC Beulah Riley Ridge (DNR) Existing CO2 Pipeline Pipelines & CO2 Sources Denbury Pipelines Denbury Proposed Pipelines Pipelines Owned by Others Existing or Proposed CO2 Source - Owned or Contracted Greencore Pipeline 232 Miles ~250 Miles Cost:~$400MM ~110 Miles Cost:~$150MM Bell Creek(3) 20 - 40 MMBbls Hartzog Draw(3) 30 - 40 MMBbls Grieve(3) 5 MMBbls Control of CO2 Sources & Pipeline Infrastructure Provides a Strategic Advantage August 2016 JV Arrangement(4) 15 – 50 MMBoe 50 – 100 MMBoe > 100 MMBoe Denbury Owned Fields – Current CO2 Floods Denbury Owned Fields – Future CO2 Floods Fields Owned by Others – CO2 EOR Candidates Cumulative Production Gas Draw(3) 10 MMBbls Summary(1) Tertiary Reserves: Proved Potential 19 336 Non-Tertiary Reserves: Proved 84 Total MMBOEs(2) 439 1) Proved tertiary and non-tertiary oil and natural gas reserves based upon year-end 12/31/16 SEC pricing. Potential includes probable and possible tertiary reserves estimated by the Company as of 12/31/16, using the mid-point of ranges, based upon a variety of recovery factors and long-term oil price assumptions, which also may include estimates of resources that do not rise to the standards of possible reserves. 2) Total reserves in this table represent total proved plus potential tertiary reserves, using the mid-point of ranges, plus proved non-tertiary reserves, but excluding additional potential related to non-tertiary exploitation opportunities. 3) Field reserves shown are estimated proved plus potential tertiary reserves. 4) The JV arrangement provides for the Company’s joint venture partner to fund up to $55 million of the remaining estimated capital to complete development of the facility and fieldwork in exchange for a 14% higher working interest and a disproportionate sharing of revenue from the first 2 million barrels of production. Currently anticipate production startup by mid-2018. Cedar Creek Anticline Area(3) 260 - 290 MMBbls
  • 12. NYSE:DNR 12 Ample CO2 Supply & No Significant Capital Required for Several Years 1) Reported on a gross (8/8th’s) basis. 2) Estimated startup in first quarter 2017. Volumes presented are based upon preliminary projections from Mississippi Power and represent maximum volumes once the power plant is running at full capacity, which is currently estimated to occur in ~2020. Gulf Coast CO2 Supply Rocky Mountain CO2 Supply LaBarge Area » Estimated field size: 750 square miles » Estimated recoverable CO2: 100 Tcf Shute Creek - ExxonMobil Operated » Proved reserves as of 12/31/16: ~1.2 Tcf » Denbury has a 1/3 overriding royalty interest and could receive up to ~115 MMcf/d of CO2 by 2021 at current plant capacity Riley Ridge – Denbury Operated » Future potential source of CO2: ~2.8 Tcf » Gas processing facility shut-in mid-2014 due to facility issues and sulfur build-up in gas supply wells Lost Cabin – ConocoPhillips Operated » Denbury could receive up to ~40 MMcf/d of CO2 at current plant capacity Jackson Dome » Proved CO2 reserves as of 12/31/16: ~5.3 Tcf(1) » Additional probable and possible CO2 reserves as of 12/31/16: ~1.2 Tcf » Currently producing at less than 60% of capacity Industrial-Sourced CO2 » Air Products: hydrogen plant - ~45 MMcf/d » PCS Nitrogen: ammonia products - ~20 MMcf/d » Mississippi Power: power plant - ~160 MMcf/d(2)
  • 13. NYSE:DNR 13 3.03 2.71 2.17 2.70 1.97 2.13 2.17 $- $0.10 $0.20 $0.30 $0.40 $- $1.00 $2.00 $3.00 $4.00 1Q15 2Q15 3Q15 4Q15 1Q16 2Q16 3Q16 - 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1Q15 2Q15 3Q15 4Q15 1Q16 2Q16 3Q16 53% REDUCTION SINCE 1Q15 979 Total Company Injected Volumes (MMcf/d) CO2CostsperMcfofCO2 1) CO2 costs in 4Q15 include workovers carried out at Jackson Dome of $3 million, or $0.46 per BOE. (1) Sustained Improvement in CO2 Efficiency Industrial-sourced CO2 Jackson Dome CO2 762 678 705 634 459 CO2CostsperBOE 78% 22% 82% 18% 458 35% REDUCTION YTD
  • 14. NYSE:DNR 14 YTD 9/30/14 YTD 9/30/15 YTD 9/30/16 G&A - Cash 4.62 4.76 4.04 Interest - Cash 7.25 6.89 7.31 Corporate Total Production & Ad Valorem Taxes 6.22 3.69 2.93 Marketing Expenses 1.43 1.52 1.74 LOE 24.51 19.98 17.29 Field Level Total Continued Improvement of Cash Operating Costs FIELD LEVEL CASH COSTS CORPORATE CASH COSTS 10% REDUCTION YTD 2016 vs. YTD 2015 $/BOE $44.03 (1) 11.87 11.65 32.16 25.19 21.96 $33.31 24% REDUCTION YTD 2016 vs. YTD 2014 (2) (1)(3) Note: The numbers presented within this table may not agree to per-BOE data presented in our consolidated financial statements due to certain amounts not settled in cash. 1) Amounts presented exclude stock compensation. 2) Amounts include capitalized interest for all periods presented. In addition, interest expense for YTD 2016 includes interest on our new 9% Senior Secured Notes, accounted for as debt for financial reporting purposes. 3) Amounts in YTD 2015 exclude a reimbursement for a retroactive utility rate adjustment ($10 MM) and an insurance reimbursement for previous well control costs ($4 MM). 4) Amounts exclude derivative settlements. Avg. Realized Price per BOE(4) 11.35 $36.84 88.79 69.51 44.35
  • 15. NYSE:DNR 15 Peer A Peer B Peer C Peer D Peer E DNR Peer F Peer G Peer H Peer I Peer J Peer K Peer L Peer M Peer N Peer O Operating Margin per BOE 23.25 22.86 22.18 21.39 21.11 18.39 18.24 18.04 18.02 16.53 16.18 15.41 14.33 13.03 12.47 5.90 Lifting Cost per BOE 7.36 8.26 13.26 7.85 5.31 23.99 10.37 11.78 11.77 9.62 11.06 7.15 19.07 7.95 10.78 7.26 Revenue per BOE 30.61 31.12 35.44 29.24 26.42 42.38 28.61 29.82 29.79 26.15 27.24 22.56 33.40 20.98 23.25 13.16 $- $5 $10 $15 $20 $25 Competitive Operating Margin Source: Bloomberg and Company filings for period ended 9/30/2016. Peers include CLR, COP, CRC, CXO, DVN, MRO, MUR, NBL, NFX, OAS, OXY, PXD, RRC, SM, and WLL. 1) Operating margin calculated as revenues less lifting costs. 2) Lifting cost calculated as lease operating expenses, marketing/transportation expenses and production and ad valorem taxes. 3) Revenues exclude gain/loss on derivative settlements. Peer Average Highest revenue per BOE in the peer group 3Q16 Peer Operating Margins ($/BOE) (1) (2) (3)
  • 16. NYSE:DNR 16 Bank Credit Facility: » $715 million in liquidity as of 9/30/16 » Basket for $1 billion of junior lien debt ($615 million issued to date) » No near-term covenant concerns at current strip prices Debt Reductions: » 17% reduction in total debt principal since YE15 » 23% reduction in total debt principal since YE14 $562 Million – Total Debt Principal Reduction in 2016 Ample Liquidity & No Near-Term Maturities(1) $260 $215 $715 $615 $773 $622 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 $2,748 $3,310 $(443) 12/31/15 Total Debt Principal 9/30/16 Total Debt Principal(2) Open-Market Debt Purchases (net) Change in Bank Revolver & Other Debt Exchanges (net) $(105) $(14) 2021 $1,050 Undrawn & Available Drawn Sr. Subordinated NotesSr. Secured Bank Credit Facility Sr. Secured Second Lien Notes 2.8% 6.375% 5.50% 4.625%9% LC’s Ample Liquidity & Significant Debt Reductions Borrowing Base 12/31/14 Total Debt Principal $3,571 $ In millions $ In millions (1) All balances presented as of 9/30/16. (2) Excludes $255 million of future interest payable on the 9% Senior Secured Second Lien Notes due 2021 accounted for as debt for financial reporting purposes.
  • 17. NYSE:DNR 17 Oil Hedge Protection 1) Averages are volume weighted. 2) If oil prices were to average less than the sold put price, receipts on settlement would be limited to the difference between the floor price and sold put price. Detail as of February 13, 2017 1Q17 2Q17 3Q17 4Q17 Swaps WTI NYMEX Fixed-Price Swaps Volumes Hedged (Bbls/d) 22,000 22,000 — — Swap Price(1) $42.67 $43.99 — — Argus LLS Fixed-Price Swaps Volumes Hedged (Bbls/d) 10,000 7,000 — — Swap Price(1) $43.77 $45.35 — — Collars WTI NYMEX Collars Volumes Hedged (Bbls/d) 4,000 — — 1,000 Floor/Ceiling Price(1) $40/$54.80 — — $40/$70 WTI NYMEX 3-Way Collars Volumes Hedged (Bbls/d) — — 14,500 11,000 Sold Put Price/Floor/Ceiling Price(1)(2) — — $30/$40/$69.09 $30/$40/$69.67 Argus LLS Collars Volumes Hedged (Bbls/d) 3,000 — — — Floor/Ceiling Price(1) $40/$57.23 — — — Argus LLS 3-Way Collars Volumes Hedged (Bbls/d) — — 2,000 1,000 Sold Put Price/Floor/Ceiling Price(1)(2) — — $31/$41/$69.25 $31/$41/$70.25 Total Volumes Hedged 39,000 29,000 16,500 13,000
  • 18. NYSE:DNR 18 Delhi NGL Plant Key benefits: » Extracts NGLs from our gas stream to be sold separately » Improves the Delhi flood with a purer CO2 recycle stream » Self-generates power using extracted methane Delhi Field Plant in service late December 2016 Delhi Field 2016 CapEx: ~$55 million
  • 19. NYSE:DNR 19 Looking Ahead Our Advantages Key Takeaways Long-Term Visibility » CO2 EOR is a proven process » Long-lived and lower-risk assets » Tremendous resource potential Capital Flexibility » Relatively low capital intensity » Able to adjust to the oil price environment Competitive Advantages » Large inventory of oil fields » Strategic CO2 supply and over 1,100 miles of CO2 pipelines » Stabilize production and resume growth as oil prices improve » Continue to improve balance sheet » Maintain and enhance efficiencies gained through the down-cycle » Pursue acquisition opportunities
  • 21. NYSE:DNR 21 CO2 EOR is a Proven Process Significant CO2 Supply by Region Gulf Coast Region » Jackson Dome, MS (Denbury Resources) » Port Arthur, TX (Denbury Resources) » Geismar, LA (Denbury Resources) » Mississippi Power (Denbury Resources) Permian Basin Region » Bravo Dome, NM (Kinder Morgan, Occidental) » McElmo Dome, CO (ExxonMobil, Kinder Morgan) » Sheep Mountain, CO (ExxonMobil, Occidental) Rocky Mountain Region » LaBarge, WY (ExxonMobil, Denbury Resources) » Lost Cabin, WY (ConocoPhillips) Canada » Dakota Gasification (Cenovus, Apache) Significant CO2 EOR Operators by Region Gulf Coast Region » Denbury Resources Permian Basin Region » Occidental » Kinder Morgan Rocky Mountain Region » Denbury Resources » Devon » FDL » Chevron Canada » Cenovus » Apache Jackson Dome Bravo Dome LaBarge Lost Cabin DGC McElmo Dome Naturally Occurring CO2 Source 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 MBbls/d Gulf Coast/Other Mid-Continent Rocky Mountains Permian Basin CO2 EOR Oil Production by Region(1) 1) Source: Advanced Resources International 2) Estimated startup in 2017. Industrial-Sourced CO2 Port Arthur Geismar MS Power(2) Sheep Mountain
  • 22. NYSE:DNR 22 Actual Industry Recovery Curves Range of Recovery 10%-18% • An auditor’s view, Mike Stell, Ryder Scott, Permian Basin Study Group, April 4, 2011 • Reserve booking guidelines, Mike Stell, Ryder Scott, CO2 Conference, Midland December 8, 2005 • What is important in the reservoir, Richard Baker, Appega Conference, April 22, 2004
  • 23. NYSE:DNR 23 Actual Curves – Denbury Mature Fields Range of Recovery 11%-20+%
  • 24. NYSE:DNR 24 Debt Structure Debt ($ in millions) 12/31/2015 Open-Market Debt Purchases Other Debt Exchanges(1) 6/30/2016 Open-Market Debt Purchases Other 9/30/2016 Senior Secured Bank Credit Facility 175 55 90 — 320 21 (81) 260 9% Senior Secured Second Lien Notes due 2021 — — — 615 615 — — 615 Total senior secured debt 175 55 90 615 935 21 (81) 875 6⅜% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2021 400 (4) — (175) 221 (6) — 215 5½% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2022 1,250 (42) — (411) 797 (24) — 773 4⅝% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2023 1,200 (106) — (472) 622 — — 622 Other subordinated notes 2 — — — 2 — — 2 Total subordinated debt 2,852 (152) — (1,058) 1,642 (30) — 1,612 Pipeline financings 212 — (4) — 208 — (3) 205 Capital lease obligations 71 — (11) — 60 — (4) 56 Total principal balance 3,310 (97) 75 (443) 2,845 (9) (88) 2,748 Future interest payable on 9% Senior Secured Second Lien Notes due 2021(2) — — — 255 255 — — 255 Issuance costs on senior subordinated notes (32) 2 1 11 (18) — 1 (17) Total debt, net of debt issuance costs on senior subordinated notes 3,278 (95) 76 (177) 3,082 (9) (87) 2,986 1) Included in the exchange were 40.7 million shares of Denbury common stock. 2) Represents future interest payable on the 9% Senior Secured Second Lien Notes due 2021 accounted for as debt for financial reporting purposes. Total Debt Principal Reduction YTD $562 million
  • 25. NYSE:DNR 25 $0 $50 $100 $150 $200 $250 $300 $350 YE2015 Bank Facility Ending Balance Changes in Working & Accrued Capital Note Repurchases 3Q16 Bank Facility Ending Balance $175 $260 $56 $(77) Capital Lease Payments & Other Adjusted Cash Flow From Operations(1), Net of CapEx(2) $(67) (In millions) YE2016 Bank Facility Estimated Ending Balance $275 - $300 1) Cash flow from operations before working capital changes (a non-GAAP measure). See press release attached as Exhibit 99.1 to the Form 8-K filed November 3, 2016 for additional information. 2) Includes development capital expenditures ($146 million), acquisitions ($11 million) and capitalized interest ($19 million). 3) Represents proceeds realized (after closing adjustments) from the Williston asset sale and other minor property divestitures during the period. YTD 2016 Change in Bank Credit Facility $(32) Proceeds From Asset Divestitures(3) $35 Adjusted Cash Flow(1) $211 CapEx(2) $(176) Total $35
  • 26. NYSE:DNR 26 Commitments & borrowing base $1.05 billion Redetermination Semi-annually – May 1st and November 1st Maturity date December 9, 2019 Permitted bond repurchases Up to $225 million of bond repurchases (~$148 million remaining as of 9/30/2016) Junior lien debt Allows for the incurrence of up to $1 billion of junior lien debt (subject to customary requirements) ($615 million issued to date as of 9/30/2016) Anti-hoarding provisions If > $250 million borrowed, unrestricted cash held in accounts is limited to $225 million Pricing grid Senior Secured Bank Credit Facility Info Financial Covenants 2016 2017 2018 2019Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total net debt to EBITDAX (max)(1) N/A N/A 6.0x 5.5x 5.0x 5.0x 4.25x Senior secured debt(2) to EBITDAX (max) 3.0x 3.0x N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A EBITDAX to interest charges (min) 1.25x 1.25x N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Current ratio (min) 1.0x 1.0x 1.0x 1.0x 1.0x 1.0x 1.0x Utilization Based Libor margin (bps) ABR margin (bps) Undrawn pricing (bps) X >90% 300 200 50 >=75% X <90% 275 175 50 >=50% X <75% 250 150 50 >=25% X <50% 225 125 50 X <25% 200 100 50 1) For purposes of the total net debt to EBITDAX calculation, EBITDAX will be annualized for each of the first three quarters of 2018, building to a full trailing twelve months by the fourth quarter of 2018. 2) Based solely on bank debt.
  • 27. NYSE:DNR 27 Preliminary Production by Area Average Daily Production (BOE/d) Field 2014 1Q15 2Q15 3Q15 4Q15 2015 1Q16 2Q16 3Q16 4Q16 2016 Mature area(1) 11,817 10,801 11,170 10,946 10,403 10,830 9,666 9,415 8,653 8,440 9,040 Delhi(2) 4,340 3,551 3,623 3,676 3,898 3,688 3,971 3,996 4,262 4,387 4,155 Hastings 4,777 4,694 5,350 5,114 5,082 5,061 5,068 4,972 4,729 4,552 4,829 Heidelberg 5,707 6,027 5,885 5,600 5,635 5,785 5,346 5,246 5,000 4,924 5,128 Oyster Bayou 4,683 5,861 5,936 5,962 5,831 5,898 5,494 5,088 4,767 4,988 5,083 Tinsley 8,507 8,928 8,740 7,311 7,522 8,119 7,899 7,335 6,756 6,786 7,192 Bell Creek 1,248 1,965 1,880 2,225 2,806 2,221 3,020 3,160 3,032 3,269 3,121 Total tertiary production 41,079 41,827 42,584 40,834 41,177 41,602 40,464 39,212 37,199 37,346 38,548 Gulf Coast non-tertiary 9,138 8,797 8,153 8,511 8,647 8,526 7,370 5,577 5,735 6,457 6,284 Cedar Creek Anticline 18,834 18,522 18,089 17,515 17,875 17,997 17,778 16,325 16,017 15,186 16,322 Other Rockies non-tertiary 3,106 3,107 2,872 2,593 2,407 2,743 2,070 1,862 1,763 1,696 1,844 Total non-tertiary production 31,078 30,426 29,114 28,619 28,929 29,266 27,218 23,764 23,515 23,339 24,450 Total continuing production 72,157 72,253 71,698 69,453 70,106 70,868 67,682 62,976 60,714 60,685 62,998 Williston assets(3) 1,744 1,643 1,561 1,522 1,473 1,549 1,364 1,267 819 --- 864 Other property divestitures 531 460 457 435 423 444 305 263 --- --- 141 Total production 74,432 74,356 73,716 71,410 72,002 72,861 69,351 64,506 61,533 60,685 64,003 1) Mature area includes Brookhaven, Cranfield, Eucutta, Little Creek, Lockhart Crossing, Mallalieu, Martinville, McComb, and Soso fields. 2) Beginning with the fourth quarter of 2014, average daily Delhi Field production amounts reflect the reversionary assignment of approximately 25% of our interest in that field effective November 1, 2014. 3) Includes non-tertiary production in the Rocky Mountain region related to the sale of remaining non-core assets in the Williston Basin of North Dakota and Montana, which closed in the third quarter of 2016.
  • 28. NYSE:DNR 28 NYMEX Oil Differential Summary Crude Oil Differentials $ per barrel 2013 2014 1Q15 2Q15 3Q15 4Q15 2015 1Q16 2Q16 3Q16 Tertiary Oil Fields Gulf Coast Region $7.86 $2.11 $(0.22) $2.04 $0.98 $(0.97) $0.60 $(1.95) $(0.98) $(0.82) Rocky Mountain Region (14.24) (11.10) (2.09) (2.81) (1.30) (1.81) (2.74) (3.09) (2.43) (2.01) Gulf Coast Non-Tertiary 4.47 (0.28) (0.71) 0.68 0.58 (0.34) (0.19) (1.95) (3.16) (0.36) Cedar Creek Anticline (7.45) (9.78) (7.95) (6.48) (4.55) (3.08) (5.49) (4.82) (3.77) (2.90) Other Rockies Non-Tertiary (10.97) (12.03) (9.84) (8.48) (8.10) (6.91) (8.12) (8.90) (7.66) (6.33) Denbury Totals $2.62 $(2.21) $(2.81) $(0.89) $(0.96) $(1.74) $(1.55) $(3.02) $(2.18) $(1.57)
  • 29. NYSE:DNR 29 Analysis of Total Operating Costs Total Operating Costs $/BOE 2013 2014 1Q15 2Q15 3Q15 4Q15 2015 1Q16 2Q16 3Q16 CO2 Costs $3.73 $3.79 $3.03 $2.71 $2.17 $2.70(1) $2.66 $1.97 $2.13 $2.17 Power & Fuel 5.36 5.93 5.88 5.28 5.77 5.43 5.59 5.26 5.02 5.39 Labor & Overhead 5.59 5.44 5.45 5.33 5.25 5.23 5.31 5.09 5.22 5.44 Repairs & Maintenance 1.33 1.45 1.44 1.22 1.27 1.41 1.33 0.80 0.73 0.98 Chemicals 1.61 1.37 1.14 1.23 1.11 1.08 1.14 0.97 0.90 1.18 Workovers 4.74 4.23 2.71 2.41 2.31 2.16 2.40 1.22 1.99 2.02 Other 1.69 1.89 1.43 1.44 1.33 1.30 1.38 0.92 1.05 1.05 Total Normalized LOE(2) $24.05 $24.10 $21.08 $19.62 $19.21 $19.31 $19.81 $16.23 $17.04 $18.23 Special or Unusual Items(3) 4.45 (0.26) --- --- (2.09) --- (0.51) --- --- --- Thompson Field Repair Costs(4) --- --- --- 0.08 0.22 --- 0.07 --- --- 0.59 Total LOE $28.50 $23.84 $21.08 $19.70 $17.34 $19.31 $19.37 $16.23 $17.04 $18.82 Oil Pricing NYMEX Oil Price $98.05 $92.95 $48.83 $57.81 $46.70 $42.15 $48.85 $33.73 $45.56 $45.02 Realized Oil Price(5) $100.67 $90.74 $46.02 $56.92 $45.74 $40.41 $47.30 $30.71 $43.38 $43.45 1) CO2 costs in 4Q15 include workovers carried out at Jackson Dome of $3 million, or $0.46 per BOE. 2) Normalized LOE excludes special or unusual items and Thompson Field repair costs (see footnote 3 and 4 below), but includes $12MM of workover expenses at Riley Ridge during 2014. 3) Special or unusual items consist of Delhi remediation charges of $114MM in 2013, Delhi remediation charges, net of insurance reimbursements of ($7MM) in 2014, and a reimbursement for a retroactive utility rate adjustment ($10MM) and an insurance reimbursement for previous well control costs ($4MM) in 3Q15. 4) Represents repair costs to return Thompson Field to production following weather-related flooding in 2Q16 and 2Q15. 5) Excludes derivative settlements.
  • 30. NYSE:DNR 30 Analysis of Tertiary Operating Costs Tertiary Operating Costs $/Bbl 2013 2014 1Q15 2Q15 3Q15 4Q15 2015 1Q16 2Q16 3Q16 CO2 Costs $6.82 $6.87 $5.39 $4.69 $3.79 $4.72(1) $4.65 $3.38 $3.51 $3.59 Power & Fuel 6.64 7.46 7.30 6.27 6.81 6.53 6.72 5.98 5.62 6.08 Labor & Overhead 4.95 5.04 5.03 4.89 4.60 4.72 4.81 4.54 4.18 4.45 Repairs & Maintenance 0.98 0.90 1.15 0.86 0.97 1.09 1.02 0.71 0.77 0.83 Chemicals 1.64 1.36 1.07 1.24 1.03 1.06 1.10 0.96 1.06 1.26 Workovers 4.03 3.15 2.06 2.00 1.73 1.61 1.85 0.85 2.04 1.55 Other 0.45 0.90 0.70 0.57 0.69 0.52 0.62 0.47 0.50 0.31 Total Normalized LOE(2) $25.51 $25.68 $22.70 $20.52 $19.62 $20.25 $20.77 $16.89 $17.68 $18.07 Special or Unusual Items(3) 8.12 (0.47) --- --- (3.64) --- (0.90) --- --- --- Total LOE $33.63 $25.21 $22.70 $20.52 $15.98 $20.25 $19.87 $16.89 $17.68 $18.07 Oil Pricing NYMEX Oil Price $98.05 $92.95 $48.83 $57.81 $46.70 $42.15 $48.85 $33.73 $45.56 $45.02 Realized Oil Price $105.88 $94.65 $48.52 $59.63 $47.56 $41.13 $49.27 $31.70 $44.46 $44.10 1) CO2 costs in 4Q15 include workovers carried out at Jackson Dome of $3 million, or $0.80 per Bbl. 2) Normalized LOE excludes special or unusual items. See (3) below. 3) Special or unusual items consist of Delhi remediation charges of $114MM in 2013, Delhi remediation charges, net of insurance reimbursements of ($7MM) in 2014, and a reimbursement for a retroactive utility rate adjustment ($10MM) and an insurance reimbursement for previous well control costs ($4MM) in 3Q15.
  • 31. NYSE:DNR 31 CO2 Cost & NYMEX Oil Price Q1 13 Q2 13 Q3 13 Q4 13 Q1 14 Q2 14 Q3 14 Q4 14 Q1 15 Q2 15 Q3 15 Q4 15 Q1 16 Q2 16 Q3 16 Tax 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.042 0.047 0.045 Purchases 0.24 0.22 0.27 0.27 0.23 0.28 0.26 0.19 0.16 0.16 0.15 0.15 0.146 0.204 0.187 OPEX 0.07 0.1 0.08 0.1 0.1 0.11 0.1 0.1 0.11 0.13 0.12 0.17 0.112 0.128 0.12 NYMEX Crude Oil Price 94.42 94.14 105.94 97.57 98.6 103.07 97.31 73.04 48.83 57.99 46.7 42.15 33.73 45.56 45.02 $0 $10 $20 $30 $40 $50 $60 $70 $80 $90 $100 $110 $0.00 $0.05 $0.10 $0.15 $0.20 $0.25 $0.30 $0.35 $0.40 $0.45 $0.50 $0.55 NYMEXCrudeOilPrice/Bbl CO2Costs/Mcf OPEX Purchases Tax NYMEX Crude Oil Price (2) (1) Industrial-Sourced CO2 % 1) Excludes DD&A on CO2 wells and facilities; includes Gulf Coast & Rocky Mountain industrial-source CO2 costs. 2) CO2 costs in 4Q15 include workovers carried out at Jackson Dome of $3 million, or $0.05 per Mcf. 2Q131Q13 4Q133Q13 2Q141Q14 4Q143Q14 2Q151Q15 4Q153Q15 1Q16 2Q16 3Q16 4% 10% 14%12% 16%14% 15%15% 22%18% 23%22% 23% 25% 22%
  • 32. NYSE:DNR 32 Non-GAAP Measures Reconciliation of net loss (GAAP measure) to adjusted cash flows from operations (non-GAAP measure) to cash flows from operations (GAAP measure) Adjusted cash flows from operations is a non-GAAP measure that represents cash flows provided by operations before changes in assets and liabilities, as summarized from the Company’s Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. Adjusted cash flows from operations measures the cash flows earned or incurred from operating activities without regard to the collection or payment of associated receivables or payables. Management believes that it is important to consider this additional measure, along with cash flows from operations, as it believes the non-GAAP measure can often be a better way to discuss changes in operating trends in its business caused by changes in production, prices, operating costs and related factors, without regard to whether the earned or incurred item was collected or paid during that period. 2015 2016 In millions Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Net loss (GAAP measure) $(108) $(1,148) $(2,244) $(885) $(185) $(381) $(25) Adjustments to reconcile to adjusted cash flows from operations Depletion, depreciation, and amortization 150 148 121 112 77 67 55 Deferred income taxes (66) (634) (732) (500) (95) (223) (14) Stock-based compensation 8 7 8 8 1 3 6 Noncash fair value adjustments on commodity derivatives 65 173 69 57 95 150 (29) Gain on debt extinguishment - - - - (95) (12) (8) Write-down of oil and natural gas properties 146 1,706 1,761 1,327 256 479 76 Impairment of goodwill - - 1,262 - - - - Other - - (2) 10 3 10 1 Adjusted cash flows from operations (non-GAAP measure) $195 $252 $243 $129 $57 $93 $62 Net change in assets and liabilities relating to operations (57) 37 30 36 (55) (32) 34 Cash flows from operations (GAAP measure) $138 $289 $273 $165 $2 $61 $96
  • 33. NYSE:DNR 33 Non-GAAP Measures (Cont.) Reconciliation of the preliminary standardized measure of discounted estimated future net cash flows after income taxes (GAAP measure) to PV-10 Value (non-GAAP measure) PV-10 Value is a non-GAAP measure and is different from the Standardized Measure in that PV-10 Value is a pre-tax number and the Standardized Measure is an after-tax number. Denbury’s 2015 and 2016 year-end estimated proved oil and natural gas reserves were prepared by the independent reservoir engineering firm of DeGolyer and MacNaughton. The information used to calculate PV-10 Value is derived directly from data determined in accordance with FASC Topic 932. Management believes PV-10 Value is a useful supplemental disclosure to the Standardized Measure because the Standardized Measure can be impacted by a company’s unique tax situation, and it is not practical to calculate the Standardized Measure on a property-by-property basis. Because of this, PV-10 Value is a widely used measure within the industry and is commonly used by securities analysts, banks and credit rating agencies to evaluate the estimated future net cash flows from proved reserves on a comparative basis across companies or specific properties. PV-10 Value is commonly used by management and others in the industry to evaluate properties that are bought and sold, to assess the potential return on investment in the Company’s oil and natural gas properties, and to perform impairment testing of oil and natural gas properties. PV-10 Value is not a measure of financial or operating performance under GAAP, nor should it be considered in isolation or as a substitute for the Standardized Measure. PV-10 Value and the preliminary Standardized Measure do not purport to represent the fair value of the Company’s oil and natural gas reserves. December 31, In millions 2015 2016 Preliminary Standardized Measure (GAAP measure) $1,890 $1,399 Discounted estimated future income tax 429 143 PV-10 Value (non-GAAP measure) $2,319 $1,542