Affidavit from inmate that prosecutors purportedly coerced into causing bodily harm to Steven Canady in the form of a head injury in exchange for a reduction of the inmate’s sentence
TNT Dinar - TNT Tony Court Sentencing Documents Tony Renfrow 14 Daily PlusIraqi Dinar News
Here are the TNT Tony court documents following his sentencing on 11/30/2015 for the 14dailyplus.com ponzi scheme. Tony's brother Raymond Renfrow (RayRen98 / RayRay) has been conducting the TNT Dinar calls in Tony's absense. Tony is not permitted to make any calls or to even use social media. Court transcripts will be release soon. Court case 2:12-cr-20041.
Follow this Slideshare channel for updates. Please share this presentation. Thanks to Sherif for showing up at the courthouse to confront Tony before his sentencing.
TNT Tony - Iraqi Dinar Guru Scam - Court Sentencing TranscriptIraqi Dinar News
TNT Tony, the dinar guru who scammed people out of over 1 million dollars, is going to prison for one year, one day. Here are the court documents and official transcripts of what was said behind closed doors.
No audio or video recording was made, this is it. Tony promoted the Iraqi dinar revaluation scam and would continually ask for either donations or mention certain Iraqi currency dealers by name, both during his time in PTR, with BlogTalk radio, and now on Free Conference call.
His brother Raymond Renfrow RayRen98 has taken over to continue the deception. Please share this document.
This document is the transcript from an initial appearance hearing in federal court for Matthew Wade Beasley, who is charged with assaulting a federal officer. At the hearing, the judge advised Beasley of his rights and the charge against him. A detention hearing was also held, where the government argued Beasley should be detained as a flight risk and danger, citing the alleged assault and Beasley's statements during a standoff with police. Beasley's attorney argued for release, saying his actions were a one-time result of extreme emotional crisis and remorse, and that he posed no danger while in his home during the standoff. The judge took the arguments under advisement.
This brief argues that the trial court erred by failing to instruct the jury on the affirmative defense of renunciation regarding the charge of tampering with evidence against Christopher Linsey. The brief outlines the statement of facts regarding Linsey being pulled over for not wearing a seatbelt and subsequently spitting out marijuana when asked by police if he had any drugs. The brief asserts that renunciation can be a defense to tampering with evidence and that the trial court should have instructed the jury on this. The brief argues this issue can be reviewed on appeal and seeks to have Linsey's conviction overturned due to the failure to properly instruct the jury.
The document is a 10-page memorandum in support of a motion to suppress evidence from a DUI arrest. It summarizes that the defendant was pulled over allegedly for a faulty tail light but the tail light was functioning properly. The officer questioned the defendant about drinking without cause for suspicion of impairment. The officer arrested the defendant based on "magic words" of impairment without evidence of erratic driving. The memorandum argues the officer lacked probable cause for the traffic stop and arrest, and all evidence obtained should be suppressed as the arrest violated the defendant's constitutional rights.
The letter provides a glowing recommendation for Karim Hamir's internship at the King County Prosecuting Attorney's Office. It states that Karim exceeded expectations in handling a caseload comparable to a first year deputy prosecutor, including conducting bail hearings, arraignments, plea negotiations, pre-trial motions and trials. The letter notes that Karim developed strong courtroom skills and handled pre-trial motions capably without supervision by the end of the internship. The supervising attorney concludes that Karim is a capable and trustworthy prosecutor who will do well in his legal career.
Eldon Spiers is charged with assault in the fifth degree, misdemeanor kidnapping, and gross misdemeanor stalking for attacking Kate Lamb in a college parking lot. Kate was grabbed from behind and dragged towards the woods by Spiers. She broke free and jumped off a bridge to escape other men. Spiers intended to cause Kate fear of harm and attempted to remove her against her will. Probable cause exists to believe Spiers committed the offenses.
The letter provides a recommendation for Karim Hamir's internship at the King County Prosecuting Attorney's Office. It states that Karim exceeded expectations in his role as a prosecutor in the District Court Unit, handling casesincluding misdemeanor crimes. The author observed Karim in court on multiple occasions and found his courtroom skills to be better than average for a new prosecutor. Karim prosecuted his cases diligently with little supervision and exercised good judgment in handling any unexpected issues. The office was fortunate to have Karim as an intern.
TNT Dinar - TNT Tony Court Sentencing Documents Tony Renfrow 14 Daily PlusIraqi Dinar News
Here are the TNT Tony court documents following his sentencing on 11/30/2015 for the 14dailyplus.com ponzi scheme. Tony's brother Raymond Renfrow (RayRen98 / RayRay) has been conducting the TNT Dinar calls in Tony's absense. Tony is not permitted to make any calls or to even use social media. Court transcripts will be release soon. Court case 2:12-cr-20041.
Follow this Slideshare channel for updates. Please share this presentation. Thanks to Sherif for showing up at the courthouse to confront Tony before his sentencing.
TNT Tony - Iraqi Dinar Guru Scam - Court Sentencing TranscriptIraqi Dinar News
TNT Tony, the dinar guru who scammed people out of over 1 million dollars, is going to prison for one year, one day. Here are the court documents and official transcripts of what was said behind closed doors.
No audio or video recording was made, this is it. Tony promoted the Iraqi dinar revaluation scam and would continually ask for either donations or mention certain Iraqi currency dealers by name, both during his time in PTR, with BlogTalk radio, and now on Free Conference call.
His brother Raymond Renfrow RayRen98 has taken over to continue the deception. Please share this document.
This document is the transcript from an initial appearance hearing in federal court for Matthew Wade Beasley, who is charged with assaulting a federal officer. At the hearing, the judge advised Beasley of his rights and the charge against him. A detention hearing was also held, where the government argued Beasley should be detained as a flight risk and danger, citing the alleged assault and Beasley's statements during a standoff with police. Beasley's attorney argued for release, saying his actions were a one-time result of extreme emotional crisis and remorse, and that he posed no danger while in his home during the standoff. The judge took the arguments under advisement.
This brief argues that the trial court erred by failing to instruct the jury on the affirmative defense of renunciation regarding the charge of tampering with evidence against Christopher Linsey. The brief outlines the statement of facts regarding Linsey being pulled over for not wearing a seatbelt and subsequently spitting out marijuana when asked by police if he had any drugs. The brief asserts that renunciation can be a defense to tampering with evidence and that the trial court should have instructed the jury on this. The brief argues this issue can be reviewed on appeal and seeks to have Linsey's conviction overturned due to the failure to properly instruct the jury.
The document is a 10-page memorandum in support of a motion to suppress evidence from a DUI arrest. It summarizes that the defendant was pulled over allegedly for a faulty tail light but the tail light was functioning properly. The officer questioned the defendant about drinking without cause for suspicion of impairment. The officer arrested the defendant based on "magic words" of impairment without evidence of erratic driving. The memorandum argues the officer lacked probable cause for the traffic stop and arrest, and all evidence obtained should be suppressed as the arrest violated the defendant's constitutional rights.
The letter provides a glowing recommendation for Karim Hamir's internship at the King County Prosecuting Attorney's Office. It states that Karim exceeded expectations in handling a caseload comparable to a first year deputy prosecutor, including conducting bail hearings, arraignments, plea negotiations, pre-trial motions and trials. The letter notes that Karim developed strong courtroom skills and handled pre-trial motions capably without supervision by the end of the internship. The supervising attorney concludes that Karim is a capable and trustworthy prosecutor who will do well in his legal career.
Eldon Spiers is charged with assault in the fifth degree, misdemeanor kidnapping, and gross misdemeanor stalking for attacking Kate Lamb in a college parking lot. Kate was grabbed from behind and dragged towards the woods by Spiers. She broke free and jumped off a bridge to escape other men. Spiers intended to cause Kate fear of harm and attempted to remove her against her will. Probable cause exists to believe Spiers committed the offenses.
The letter provides a recommendation for Karim Hamir's internship at the King County Prosecuting Attorney's Office. It states that Karim exceeded expectations in his role as a prosecutor in the District Court Unit, handling casesincluding misdemeanor crimes. The author observed Karim in court on multiple occasions and found his courtroom skills to be better than average for a new prosecutor. Karim prosecuted his cases diligently with little supervision and exercised good judgment in handling any unexpected issues. The office was fortunate to have Karim as an intern.
This document outlines the preliminary jury instructions for a trial involving a pregnancy discrimination lawsuit. The plaintiff, Veronika Chauca, claims she was unlawfully discriminated against when her employer, Park Management Center, failed to reinstate her after maternity leave. The defense denies the claim and says they had legitimate business reasons for their actions. The jury instructions explain the elements the plaintiff must prove, define direct and circumstantial evidence, and provide guidance on evaluating the evidence and testimony presented at trial.
Trinity Kings World Leadership(Terrell Patillo): Arthur Balthrop takes me to ...Terrell Patillo
Psalm 37:33Easy-to-Read Version (ERV)
33 But the Lord will not let the wicked defeat them.
He will not let good people be judged guilty.
Psalm 127:5New International Version (NIV)
5
They will not be put to shame
when they contend with their opponents in court.
This document is a letter from attorney Michael J. Waxman to Michelle at the Maine District Court regarding the case Malenko v. Handrahan. The letter encloses documents showing the disposition of Mr. Malenko's criminal shoplifting case. Mr. Waxman requests that these documents be brought to Judge Moskowitz's attention so that a hearing on pending motions to modify and regarding relocation can be rescheduled as soon as possible.
Motion to rein in lawless & contemptuos obama administrationBryan Johnson
Defendants have consistently violated the Settlement since the summer of 2014 and 27 this Court’s Orders since August 2015. Their conduct is lawless and contemptuous..Nevertheless, Plaintiffs do not at this time seek a contempt ruling against Defendants believing that it
The Pavilion Condominium Association is suing Jorge Rodriguez-Suarez for damages exceeding $15,000. The complaint alleges that while Rodriguez-Suarez was on the Association's board of directors and acting as treasurer, he usurped control over decision-making and authorized over $1.5-2 million in construction work without securing proper approval or funding. This resulted in the Association incurring substantial costs for work it did not budget or approve. The complaint further alleges that Rodriguez-Suarez misled the board and sought to cover up his actions.
Trinity Kings World Leadership reported(*Feb 4 2013*) former attorney Milton ...Terrell Patillo
Proverbs 17:23
New International Version (NIV)
23 The wicked accept bribes in secret
to pervert the course of justice.
Exodus 23:8
New International Version (NIV)
8 “Do not accept a bribe, for a bribe blinds those who see and twists the words of the innocent.
Ezra 7:26New International Version (NIV)
26 Whoever does not obey the law of your God and the law of the king must surely be punished by death, banishment, confiscation of property, or imprisonment.
God’s Wrath Against Sinful Humanity
18 The wrath of God is being revealed from heaven against all the godlessness and wickedness of people, who suppress the truth by their wickedness, 19 since what may be known about God is plain to them, because God has made it plain to them. 20 For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse.
21 For although they knew God, they neither glorified him as God nor gave thanks to him, but their thinking became futile and their foolish hearts were darkened. 22 Although they claimed to be wise, they became fools 23 and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images made to look like a mortal human being and birds and animals and reptiles.
24 Therefore God gave them over in the sinful desires of their hearts to sexual impurity for the degrading of their bodies with one another. 25 They exchanged the truth about God for a lie, and worshiped and served created things rather than the Creator—who is forever praised. Amen.
26 Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural sexual relations for unnatural ones. 27 In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed shameful acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their error.
28 Furthermore, just as they did not think it worthwhile to retain the knowledge of God, so God gave them over to a depraved mind, so that they do what ought not to be done. 29 They have become filled with every kind of wickedness, evil, greed and depravity. They are full of envy, murder, strife, deceit and malice. They are gossips, 30 slanderers, God-haters, insolent, arrogant and boastful; they invent ways of doing evil; they disobey their parents; 31 they have no understanding, no fidelity, no love, no mercy. 32 Although they know God’s righteous decree that those who do such things deserve death, they not only continue to do these very things but also approve of those who practice them.
This document outlines an agenda for a class on criminal procedures that includes an overview of criminal procedures, introducing mock trial facts, and preparing for a mock trial. Students are assigned roles for the mock trial and instructed to find sources to support their roles. The document provides details on criminal procedure such as the roles of police, district attorneys, defenders, and judges. It also outlines the typical stages of a criminal case from investigation to sentencing and appeals. Students are given tasks to complete in preparation for the mock trial.
Emmanuel Roy alias EJR III coupable des cinq chefs d'accusations de fraudes e...GerardPradel
Emmanuel Roy alias EJR III a été reconnu coupable de cinq chefs d'accusations et condamne a sept mois de prison. Les crimes commis sont:
1. Complot pour commettre la fraude
2. Complot pour commettre la fraude électronique
3. Complot pour commettre la fraude bancaire
4. Fraude 1047 A Herkimer Street
5. Fraude 377 Quincy Street et Snedike Ave
Statement by former Chief Justice Mogoeng Mogoeng 03 feb 2022SABC News
"I, Mogoeng Mogoeng, the former Chief Justice of the Republic of South Africa, hereby apologise unconditionally for becoming involved in political controversy through my utterances at the online seminar (webinar) hosted by the Jerusalem Post on 23 June 2020, in which I participated".
This summary discusses whether just outcomes can be achieved for Aboriginal accused persons tried by juries without Aboriginal jurors. It notes that while underrepresentation of Aboriginal people on jury rolls is a widespread issue that needs addressing, it argues that a just outcome is still possible in such a trial. The paper examines Charter rights to an impartial trial and representative jury. It explores the jury selection process and issues of low Aboriginal participation. While changes are needed, it concludes that with steps like addressing bias and allowing expert testimony on Aboriginal issues, justice can be served even without Aboriginal jurors.
This document outlines an agenda for a class on criminal procedures and introduces a mock trial exercise. It includes an overview of criminal procedures, roles in the criminal justice system, and steps in the criminal process like investigation, arrest, bail, preliminary hearings, trials, and sentencing. It then provides details and instructions for two mock trial cases involving charges of murder or manslaughter in the death of babies or adults. Students are assigned roles and tasks to prepare opening and closing statements and examine witnesses for the mock trial.
17 USC § 107 (LIMITATIONS On EXCLUSIVE Rights - FAIR USE)
This is the TRANSCRIPT from the September 18, 2015 Bankruptcy Court Hearing in the United States Federal Bankruptcy Court - Southern District Mississippi (Jackson). The Photographs/Pictures have been added for EMPHASIS and BETTER UNDERSTANDING!
This document examines the admissibility of confessions in the law of evidence in Zambia. It begins with an introduction to confessions and the scope of examining their admissibility. It then discusses the history of confessions and arguments for and against their use. Next, it analyzes the burden of proof regarding the admissibility of confessions and the courts' practice and procedure for determining their voluntariness and admissibility through a trial within a trial. The goal of the research is to provide guidance on ensuring confessions are obtained fairly and used appropriately in legal proceedings in accordance with Zambian law.
The document discusses a letter sent by Dr. Alok Umre, Secretary of TEAM VHA, to the Commissioner of Police in Nashik. The letter requests the police to sensitize personnel about recent High Court decisions regarding FIRs and complaints filed against doctors. It notes the Court upheld a 2010 Government Resolution requiring complaints be reviewed by committees including doctors before police action. The letter asks for information on Nashik's valid review committee and warns any actions without committee scrutiny will be illegal. It encourages adhering to the 2010 resolution and Court orders to avoid unnecessary harassment of doctors.
Precedent (Court of Appeal & Supreme Court)Miss Hart
The document contains a series of short, ambiguous phrases that could have multiple meanings taken out of context. It touches on topics like marriage, violence, gangs, and killing while using wordplay and unconventional phrasing that makes the intent and context behind each statement unclear without more information. Overall, the document presents a confusing set of statements that require additional context to understand fully.
Harrison feels that a lot of the economic crisis in the country is because people fail to understand one another. A lot of businesses with great potential often fail because the employees fail to understand the employer's concerns.
ASSIGNMENT #13 We are now at the trial of this case. You.docxjane3dyson92312
ASSIGNMENT #13
We are now at the trial of this case. You are to prepare an outline of the witnesses
that you intend to call at trial and a brief synopsis of the testimony that you expect each
will provide. You are also to prepare a written opening statement to the jury on what you
intend to prove. Lastly, what, if any, rebuttal case will you prepare in advance?
ASSIGNMENT #12
As to the Sandoval hearing, the court made a compromise decision. The court ruled that the convictions from the 1990s and early 2000s were too remote in time to be presently probative. The court will allow the prosecution to ask Randolph if he has been previously convicted of the felony of grand larceny if Randolph takes the stand. The prosecutor will not be allowed to delve into the underlying facts of this crime. Finally, the court rules that the defense can call an expert on eyewitness identification at trial.
We are now at the beginning of trial. As to jury selection, you are to research what are the characteristics of the potential jurors that you want to serve in this case. You are also to research what are the characteristics of the potential jurors that you do not want to serve in this case.
You are to submit a summary of the research for this assignment.
.
ASSIGNMENT #11
The hearing court denied both of Randolph’s suppression motions. It held that the
complainant’s photo identification was sufficiently reliable to establish probable cause. It
further held that the lineup identification was not unduly suggestive since any physical
differences between Randolph and the fillers were minimal and did not draw any undue
attention to him.
We are nearing the beginning of trial. We now turn our attention to the final
pretrial hearing.
Except in specific cases involving specific circumstances (not present in your
case), a prosecutor may not use a defendant’s criminal history as affirmative evidence of
that person’s guilt. This prevents a jury from convicting an individual on a propensity
theory. Prosecutors can, however, use a defendant’s criminal history to impeach a
defendant’s credibility in the event he takes the stand at trial. This history is used as
impeachment material to attack the defendant’s credibility. In other words, since the
defendant has previously broken the law and thus has put his interests above that of
society, the jury should not believe the defendant’s testimony.
In order to assess the proper use of a defendant’s criminal history in the event that
the defendant takes the witness stand, the court conducts a pretrial hearing where the
judge weighs the probative value of the evidence against its prejudicial impact. In
essence, this is a balancing test and the court usually reaches a compromise decision
satisfying neither party.
You are now at the Sandoval hearing in Randolph’s case. This hearing comes
from People v. Sandoval, 34 N.Y.2d 371 (1974). You must read that decision to complete
thi.
This letter confirms that the law firm of Covington & Burling LLP will represent Steven Canady in his direct appeal of criminal convictions. The firm will charge hourly rates between $395 and $1,250 per hour for lawyers and $235 to $455 per hour for legal assistants. Canady agrees to pay an initial retainer of $275,000, with $25,000 to be applied to the final bill and the remainder to monthly bills. The letter outlines payment terms, potential conflicts of interest, and consent for the firm to represent Canady's adversaries in unrelated matters.
This document outlines the preliminary jury instructions for a trial involving a pregnancy discrimination lawsuit. The plaintiff, Veronika Chauca, claims she was unlawfully discriminated against when her employer, Park Management Center, failed to reinstate her after maternity leave. The defense denies the claim and says they had legitimate business reasons for their actions. The jury instructions explain the elements the plaintiff must prove, define direct and circumstantial evidence, and provide guidance on evaluating the evidence and testimony presented at trial.
Trinity Kings World Leadership(Terrell Patillo): Arthur Balthrop takes me to ...Terrell Patillo
Psalm 37:33Easy-to-Read Version (ERV)
33 But the Lord will not let the wicked defeat them.
He will not let good people be judged guilty.
Psalm 127:5New International Version (NIV)
5
They will not be put to shame
when they contend with their opponents in court.
This document is a letter from attorney Michael J. Waxman to Michelle at the Maine District Court regarding the case Malenko v. Handrahan. The letter encloses documents showing the disposition of Mr. Malenko's criminal shoplifting case. Mr. Waxman requests that these documents be brought to Judge Moskowitz's attention so that a hearing on pending motions to modify and regarding relocation can be rescheduled as soon as possible.
Motion to rein in lawless & contemptuos obama administrationBryan Johnson
Defendants have consistently violated the Settlement since the summer of 2014 and 27 this Court’s Orders since August 2015. Their conduct is lawless and contemptuous..Nevertheless, Plaintiffs do not at this time seek a contempt ruling against Defendants believing that it
The Pavilion Condominium Association is suing Jorge Rodriguez-Suarez for damages exceeding $15,000. The complaint alleges that while Rodriguez-Suarez was on the Association's board of directors and acting as treasurer, he usurped control over decision-making and authorized over $1.5-2 million in construction work without securing proper approval or funding. This resulted in the Association incurring substantial costs for work it did not budget or approve. The complaint further alleges that Rodriguez-Suarez misled the board and sought to cover up his actions.
Trinity Kings World Leadership reported(*Feb 4 2013*) former attorney Milton ...Terrell Patillo
Proverbs 17:23
New International Version (NIV)
23 The wicked accept bribes in secret
to pervert the course of justice.
Exodus 23:8
New International Version (NIV)
8 “Do not accept a bribe, for a bribe blinds those who see and twists the words of the innocent.
Ezra 7:26New International Version (NIV)
26 Whoever does not obey the law of your God and the law of the king must surely be punished by death, banishment, confiscation of property, or imprisonment.
God’s Wrath Against Sinful Humanity
18 The wrath of God is being revealed from heaven against all the godlessness and wickedness of people, who suppress the truth by their wickedness, 19 since what may be known about God is plain to them, because God has made it plain to them. 20 For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse.
21 For although they knew God, they neither glorified him as God nor gave thanks to him, but their thinking became futile and their foolish hearts were darkened. 22 Although they claimed to be wise, they became fools 23 and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images made to look like a mortal human being and birds and animals and reptiles.
24 Therefore God gave them over in the sinful desires of their hearts to sexual impurity for the degrading of their bodies with one another. 25 They exchanged the truth about God for a lie, and worshiped and served created things rather than the Creator—who is forever praised. Amen.
26 Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural sexual relations for unnatural ones. 27 In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed shameful acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their error.
28 Furthermore, just as they did not think it worthwhile to retain the knowledge of God, so God gave them over to a depraved mind, so that they do what ought not to be done. 29 They have become filled with every kind of wickedness, evil, greed and depravity. They are full of envy, murder, strife, deceit and malice. They are gossips, 30 slanderers, God-haters, insolent, arrogant and boastful; they invent ways of doing evil; they disobey their parents; 31 they have no understanding, no fidelity, no love, no mercy. 32 Although they know God’s righteous decree that those who do such things deserve death, they not only continue to do these very things but also approve of those who practice them.
This document outlines an agenda for a class on criminal procedures that includes an overview of criminal procedures, introducing mock trial facts, and preparing for a mock trial. Students are assigned roles for the mock trial and instructed to find sources to support their roles. The document provides details on criminal procedure such as the roles of police, district attorneys, defenders, and judges. It also outlines the typical stages of a criminal case from investigation to sentencing and appeals. Students are given tasks to complete in preparation for the mock trial.
Emmanuel Roy alias EJR III coupable des cinq chefs d'accusations de fraudes e...GerardPradel
Emmanuel Roy alias EJR III a été reconnu coupable de cinq chefs d'accusations et condamne a sept mois de prison. Les crimes commis sont:
1. Complot pour commettre la fraude
2. Complot pour commettre la fraude électronique
3. Complot pour commettre la fraude bancaire
4. Fraude 1047 A Herkimer Street
5. Fraude 377 Quincy Street et Snedike Ave
Statement by former Chief Justice Mogoeng Mogoeng 03 feb 2022SABC News
"I, Mogoeng Mogoeng, the former Chief Justice of the Republic of South Africa, hereby apologise unconditionally for becoming involved in political controversy through my utterances at the online seminar (webinar) hosted by the Jerusalem Post on 23 June 2020, in which I participated".
This summary discusses whether just outcomes can be achieved for Aboriginal accused persons tried by juries without Aboriginal jurors. It notes that while underrepresentation of Aboriginal people on jury rolls is a widespread issue that needs addressing, it argues that a just outcome is still possible in such a trial. The paper examines Charter rights to an impartial trial and representative jury. It explores the jury selection process and issues of low Aboriginal participation. While changes are needed, it concludes that with steps like addressing bias and allowing expert testimony on Aboriginal issues, justice can be served even without Aboriginal jurors.
This document outlines an agenda for a class on criminal procedures and introduces a mock trial exercise. It includes an overview of criminal procedures, roles in the criminal justice system, and steps in the criminal process like investigation, arrest, bail, preliminary hearings, trials, and sentencing. It then provides details and instructions for two mock trial cases involving charges of murder or manslaughter in the death of babies or adults. Students are assigned roles and tasks to prepare opening and closing statements and examine witnesses for the mock trial.
17 USC § 107 (LIMITATIONS On EXCLUSIVE Rights - FAIR USE)
This is the TRANSCRIPT from the September 18, 2015 Bankruptcy Court Hearing in the United States Federal Bankruptcy Court - Southern District Mississippi (Jackson). The Photographs/Pictures have been added for EMPHASIS and BETTER UNDERSTANDING!
This document examines the admissibility of confessions in the law of evidence in Zambia. It begins with an introduction to confessions and the scope of examining their admissibility. It then discusses the history of confessions and arguments for and against their use. Next, it analyzes the burden of proof regarding the admissibility of confessions and the courts' practice and procedure for determining their voluntariness and admissibility through a trial within a trial. The goal of the research is to provide guidance on ensuring confessions are obtained fairly and used appropriately in legal proceedings in accordance with Zambian law.
The document discusses a letter sent by Dr. Alok Umre, Secretary of TEAM VHA, to the Commissioner of Police in Nashik. The letter requests the police to sensitize personnel about recent High Court decisions regarding FIRs and complaints filed against doctors. It notes the Court upheld a 2010 Government Resolution requiring complaints be reviewed by committees including doctors before police action. The letter asks for information on Nashik's valid review committee and warns any actions without committee scrutiny will be illegal. It encourages adhering to the 2010 resolution and Court orders to avoid unnecessary harassment of doctors.
Precedent (Court of Appeal & Supreme Court)Miss Hart
The document contains a series of short, ambiguous phrases that could have multiple meanings taken out of context. It touches on topics like marriage, violence, gangs, and killing while using wordplay and unconventional phrasing that makes the intent and context behind each statement unclear without more information. Overall, the document presents a confusing set of statements that require additional context to understand fully.
Harrison feels that a lot of the economic crisis in the country is because people fail to understand one another. A lot of businesses with great potential often fail because the employees fail to understand the employer's concerns.
ASSIGNMENT #13 We are now at the trial of this case. You.docxjane3dyson92312
ASSIGNMENT #13
We are now at the trial of this case. You are to prepare an outline of the witnesses
that you intend to call at trial and a brief synopsis of the testimony that you expect each
will provide. You are also to prepare a written opening statement to the jury on what you
intend to prove. Lastly, what, if any, rebuttal case will you prepare in advance?
ASSIGNMENT #12
As to the Sandoval hearing, the court made a compromise decision. The court ruled that the convictions from the 1990s and early 2000s were too remote in time to be presently probative. The court will allow the prosecution to ask Randolph if he has been previously convicted of the felony of grand larceny if Randolph takes the stand. The prosecutor will not be allowed to delve into the underlying facts of this crime. Finally, the court rules that the defense can call an expert on eyewitness identification at trial.
We are now at the beginning of trial. As to jury selection, you are to research what are the characteristics of the potential jurors that you want to serve in this case. You are also to research what are the characteristics of the potential jurors that you do not want to serve in this case.
You are to submit a summary of the research for this assignment.
.
ASSIGNMENT #11
The hearing court denied both of Randolph’s suppression motions. It held that the
complainant’s photo identification was sufficiently reliable to establish probable cause. It
further held that the lineup identification was not unduly suggestive since any physical
differences between Randolph and the fillers were minimal and did not draw any undue
attention to him.
We are nearing the beginning of trial. We now turn our attention to the final
pretrial hearing.
Except in specific cases involving specific circumstances (not present in your
case), a prosecutor may not use a defendant’s criminal history as affirmative evidence of
that person’s guilt. This prevents a jury from convicting an individual on a propensity
theory. Prosecutors can, however, use a defendant’s criminal history to impeach a
defendant’s credibility in the event he takes the stand at trial. This history is used as
impeachment material to attack the defendant’s credibility. In other words, since the
defendant has previously broken the law and thus has put his interests above that of
society, the jury should not believe the defendant’s testimony.
In order to assess the proper use of a defendant’s criminal history in the event that
the defendant takes the witness stand, the court conducts a pretrial hearing where the
judge weighs the probative value of the evidence against its prejudicial impact. In
essence, this is a balancing test and the court usually reaches a compromise decision
satisfying neither party.
You are now at the Sandoval hearing in Randolph’s case. This hearing comes
from People v. Sandoval, 34 N.Y.2d 371 (1974). You must read that decision to complete
thi.
This letter confirms that the law firm of Covington & Burling LLP will represent Steven Canady in his direct appeal of criminal convictions. The firm will charge hourly rates between $395 and $1,250 per hour for lawyers and $235 to $455 per hour for legal assistants. Canady agrees to pay an initial retainer of $275,000, with $25,000 to be applied to the final bill and the remainder to monthly bills. The letter outlines payment terms, potential conflicts of interest, and consent for the firm to represent Canady's adversaries in unrelated matters.
- The document is a memorandum and order from the Supreme Court of New York revoking an attorney's admission to practice law in the state.
- The attorney, Daniel DeMaria, failed to disclose a prior disciplinary issue from Saskatchewan, Canada where he was found to have breached integrity rules and denied admission, when applying to the New York bar.
- Due to the nondisclosure, the attorney was admitted to New York without proper consideration of his full background and record of misconduct. The court revoked his admission, finding a lack of candor, and prohibited him from practicing law in New York.
The document discusses the benefits of exercise for mental health. Regular physical activity can help reduce anxiety and depression and improve mood and cognitive functioning. Exercise causes chemical changes in the brain that may help protect against mental illness and improve symptoms.
Credit Suisse issued a letter of credit valued at $95 billion USD. A letter of credit is a financial instrument used to facilitate international trade where a bank guarantees payment to a beneficiary if certain conditions are met. This $95 billion letter of credit issued by Credit Suisse was one of the largest ever and helped facilitate a significant international trade deal.
Patton Boggs legal opinion explanation Steven Canady StevenCanady2017
Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP is an international law firm with offices in 21 countries. In 2010, the District Attorney in Carroll County, Georgia filed theft charges against Steven Canady involving a disputed financing transaction. The allegations were typically a civil matter. In 2014, Mr. Canady agreed to enter an Alford plea to resolve the case, acknowledging a local jury would likely find him guilty, even though he maintained his innocence. The District Attorney did not actively prosecute the case and did not seek confinement, indicating a lack of factual basis for fraud allegations. By reimbursing the alleged victims' investments, all charges against Mr. Canady will be set aside.
Genocide in International Criminal Law.pptxMasoudZamani13
Excited to share insights from my recent presentation on genocide! 💡 In light of ongoing debates, it's crucial to delve into the nuances of this grave crime.
Matthew Professional CV experienced Government LiaisonMattGardner52
As an experienced Government Liaison, I have demonstrated expertise in Corporate Governance. My skill set includes senior-level management in Contract Management, Legal Support, and Diplomatic Relations. I have also gained proficiency as a Corporate Liaison, utilizing my strong background in accounting, finance, and legal, with a Bachelor's degree (B.A.) from California State University. My Administrative Skills further strengthen my ability to contribute to the growth and success of any organization.
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...Sangyun Lee
Presentation slides for a session held on June 4, 2024, at Kyoto University. This presentation is based on the presenter’s recent paper, coauthored with Hwang Lee, Professor, Korea University, with the same title, published in the Journal of Business Administration & Law, Volume 34, No. 2 (April 2024). The paper, written in Korean, is available at <https://shorturl.at/GCWcI>.
What are the common challenges faced by women lawyers working in the legal pr...lawyersonia
The legal profession, which has historically been male-dominated, has experienced a significant increase in the number of women entering the field over the past few decades. Despite this progress, women lawyers continue to encounter various challenges as they strive for top positions.
This document briefly explains the June compliance calendar 2024 with income tax returns, PF, ESI, and important due dates, forms to be filled out, periods, and who should file them?.
सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने यह भी माना था कि मजिस्ट्रेट का यह कर्तव्य है कि वह सुनिश्चित करे कि अधिकारी पीएमएलए के तहत निर्धारित प्रक्रिया के साथ-साथ संवैधानिक सुरक्षा उपायों का भी उचित रूप से पालन करें।
The Future of Criminal Defense Lawyer in India.pdfveteranlegal
https://veteranlegal.in/defense-lawyer-in-india/ | Criminal defense Lawyer in India has always been a vital aspect of the country's legal system. As defenders of justice, criminal Defense Lawyer play a critical role in ensuring that individuals accused of crimes receive a fair trial and that their constitutional rights are protected. As India evolves socially, economically, and technologically, the role and future of criminal Defense Lawyer are also undergoing significant changes. This comprehensive blog explores the current landscape, challenges, technological advancements, and prospects for criminal Defense Lawyer in India.
Business law for the students of undergraduate level. The presentation contains the summary of all the chapters under the syllabus of State University, Contract Act, Sale of Goods Act, Negotiable Instrument Act, Partnership Act, Limited Liability Act, Consumer Protection Act.
Defending Weapons Offence Charges: Role of Mississauga Criminal Defence LawyersHarpreetSaini48
Discover how Mississauga criminal defence lawyers defend clients facing weapon offence charges with expert legal guidance and courtroom representation.
To know more visit: https://www.saini-law.com/
1. AFFIDAVIT OF MELVIN CDTTDN
I make these statements voluntarily and of my oun free uill and
that they are true and factual to the best of my knouiledge.
On 10-12-2016 at around 11:00 a.m. in Brooklyn Supreme Court
bullpen, I uas approached by an individual uho claimed he re
presented the Manhattan's prosecutor's office. He uias a uhite
Caucasian male about 6'1 or 6'2 around 175 lbs. uith grey eyes,
1
slim. He mentioned his name but unfortunately I" don't recalV it.
He then informed me that he uias familiar uith my case, being that
as part of my plea deal uith the Brooklyn District Attorney I ha
had to speak truthfully to all other agencies that took an inter
est in my case. So I assumed that he uias here to offer me some
kind of deal. Hou he kneu of my plea deal I do not knoui, but he
proposed that he had a better offer than the one that I agreed to
uiith the Brooklyn District Attorney Gavin Miles, in exchange for
a small accomodation. Uhen I asked uhat he meant? , he then ask
ed me 'Did I knoui a individual by the name of Steven Canady?' to
uihich I replied "Yes I do as a matter of fact he sleeps right ne
xt to me." On Rikers Island. He then broke off this line of ques-
ioning and started on my criminal history with a emphasis on my
violent felonies. He stated that from looking at my criminal his
tory, 'That I have no problem hurting people, it seems to be your
M.O.". One again I asked him, "What uias his point? He then inf
ormed me that once I completed my state sentence that I agreed
to in Brooklyn, that the Manhattan office could just possibly
pick-up it's case because it uias later determined, that someone
had gotten injured during the commission of that crime. He then
stated that if I uias to help them uiith a little problem then he
uas authorized to make that case go auiay, being that I could
have been possibly facing a life sentence, if convicted. So I
asked his "What kind of deal, uihere you talking about?", He
stated flat out that Mr. Canady needs to suffer a severe head
injury , in exchange for this, our office will recommend in
stead of the 10 flat that you agreed to, ue uiill recommend 6
2. flat yith 3 post if you agreed to take care of Mr. Canady. I
asked hoy yould he knoy and gave me his card and left. To sup
port this affidavit is a copy of the incident report that is
lodged against me concerning Mr. Steven Canady.
Melvin Cotton
September 26, 2Q17
Frederick liJ. Ford, Notary Public
N0.01FD^973371
QUALIFIED IN BRONX COUNTY
COMM. EXP. 10/22/18
3. A'mD^/lT OF /IfUWCflw
'7"MFCe TUFSF IffifFHFyfS VQlCWFiVlPj
AM OF m IjjFN fKF Will Ml)TFl^l
fz/p/ Me- ri?uF Mb Fftm/AL ro 7F-e BeFi
OfH^IFjFoiAlLFbAF
OAllHl mu ftr ARouoAQ iroVfiilliJ
mmm jupafhi? mai&}iiPFiFS i m5
lippzoAtMfD 8V A nioimm uinn fjAniFf)
PF PfPPFJF/Fred rf4F mmMTiMl fRDiFFuWI'^
mce,HF wpi >A umiTF MurAC/AnJ nPiF
AP>6U7 /,'! oe. I'.T mum)nSlbA IV/W h£H
F^FPJun PfF HmmMD HlI hlMF BUI
UMfdFFiMA'ft^N -L bhm PFMH 17. PF FPFi7
FLMFOmFD Ht- FFPrnFWfi'^ FAtPUAF WifH
W CASF bFnjf-t rM1 AS PARl FFHP PlFA
Dm vnm FHF f)FdbmA!)mit7nrMivFF
7Flan Ad Spfsf ssuAHfum ad aii fsffi
AhFuaes fMi fodFam mFF^AF ihi mlfa(f
Jb LASSweb 7FF7af was atee ro rfm
He 3'OHF FjilA hP AFFl. HOW UFFAim bFM
PlEAJMLX Do Ad7iOAoul, Buf AF PPoPdJFAtfl y'sirr D f /)Ai i lO A n »> / i i
miPF Phi ft meF(ffFP PFANSHF WF
mfilOLAFmp YO WiTF YHF3P0DFNA
MK/t?Pf!tmeP fipyiM wm. pm eiOAmF
HP ajpah PcitF^b/omo. oMfn r asffi)
iT
L
•H PfPHuir hf rpFh!Asieb He'bn)
FllbA h IklDNlbUU f>7 IFF MFHF'OP
mMftI OAAADAI IT) WUAH A eepuepHFS
05 as a HATlFF OF FACT DFSleeps S/OPZ ) ^ / A / r) t !^n^ /ry^ /O . ./k .. . . r~~^ .^ ~
hlHI ID FFS ok FIFFPS%SLPVIP, ue 1HFN
MoYe OFF rFlJ Hi^Fj)f QuePfhiAeOi M'P
sfMpeb 6H mScW'iM'-jjysroes isiiH & _
v7o&rW7oFiel.__'hiF
4. S7AKt> flip LOOi^iiOii M m ttinmL
UMIffn'fl //-ff AiO fMietiTiiTHie7i^fi
WoP/fSr Wfff' nsfVous. fi.OiMf
X Wn."mfi7m$ m Ponif-
Hf W7N Wcififd hffppy Difce X CPPifM
uiswfJ' mfM WM7XPeKfb%jP
•Jp fP¥1ipepfiPpJfM jFFit^ miD
'ffsMsfpftmVeii'
milDrieehiNebMftiMfbPp pap
Mie'p/SM&)DuMb Wf PdWlf/d/U of
Wl.ClMe.Mt WfC wmp fMAf /?X MS
l.bJ-1-tlP YPfF WifH MMtiePldBlFMI 7hFil
ti£.WAlimMM£P fbHPiM YHAf CAbP '
6k PPA6 3fm-rpA7X'' CbU)PPMX ipfM
■L
'^'''""' MfCtPpiTep
J.D.l. ASMtPMMSW.Mfll tlUO hf affiL WfMie
u.Mmnk¥iiBM7S We srmo FiMf lui
l6A7.WaiC&PM.N.Ql)J Ib lUWeFJ 9fvm
toAi.yjy2i^XM_atfciAM(]£,XQg rffis, Due bWW
Mil iMSleftO. of WbjxbM.IHM
I&j.Xf NiJjjl VCfOHVIffOO 6 VIA1
tott--X20irxfX(ou xs cjvee"
CE MC- CJnUflD4, % xsffXMpFwouWTfe
YftM z nWW wififif brpffii"'
'P/Vd (M aFP
, «CM.tP Ml'PFFpyo'XptFPFf
mtH^n X i&fYTfjmjpmwr'
MpST WDfWMmiTMTcm
UuJJjA
/WO. 0iFO407337i O ^
QUAUFIGD IM
BRONX.COUNTY- :
-
5. > .' K-
C,'
" '.."P
. .'i??
CORRECTION DEPARTMENT
CITY OF NEW YORK
REPORT AND NOTICE OFINFRACTION
FORM:6S00A
Rev. :08/04/15
Ref. :Dir.#5500R-C
Infraclion it: Institution;
O.B.C.C.
Date of
Incident: 12/27yi6
Inmate Name(l.ast,First): Cotton,Mclvill
.Dcmion ofincident(Be Specific)
Dorm 2 Lower dayroom
Charge //
101.13
101.14""
lou'v""
Offense
Assault with a weapon-walking cane
Fighting with injury
Fighting without injury
ReportingOfTiciaJ(Print Nam^ Rank and Shield #): ~Knnt Nam^ Rank and
ru ri"yg
Time Infraction
Written: 12/2016
B&c: 141-13-08098
Sentence if:
Housing Area
Location: 2LoWCf
Date of
Report: 12/20'16
NYSiD: 04770279-P
Approximate Time Of
Incident: 0948!houri
Charge#
101.11
Offense
Assaultwhen he orsheinjuriesany oth^r perso
or throw any objector substance at any other
person.
Redo: g Official(Signature): y
Details ofIncident(Include details affto How,When and Where Infraction was Committed):
On December 20,2016 at approximately0948 hoursin dorm 2lower dayroom area,Officer Williams#5524
observed inmate Cotton,MelvinB&C#141-13-08098/NYSID #04770279-? engaged in inmate oninmate'fight
inmate Canady,Steven B&C#310-15-00685/NYSID #12664774^R. Upon review ofthe genetic video suiweill
camera angel house_front-2inmate Cotton was observed taking his walking cane striking inmate Canady s
approximately(2)two timesto his upper body andfacial area. Inmate Cottonthenstruckinmate Canady multi
limes with aclosedfist whilesimultaneously holding his walking canein his hand. Both inmatesseparated. TI
probe team arrive and escorted inmate Cotton and Canadyoutofthe area.
Inmate Cotton you are hereby being placed in PHD,Red ID and Enhanced Restraints status.
withi
ances^
le
N-
You are entitled to a hearing forthis infraction no soonerthan twenty-four(24)hours after you areserved with this Notice. Ifyou are a sentenced Inmate and you ttommit
an infraction within twenty-four(24)hours prior to yourdischarge, and have notreached your maximum sentence expiration date,you may be served w th charj :s and
held for a hearing. The Department will make every effort to hold this hearing within three(3)business days ofthe service ofthis Notice.This three(3)businr ss day
period,excludes the day you.are seryed,weekends,holidays,days you go to court(whetherin person or via teleconference),days you are hospitalized or ata I ospital
attending a clinic, days youMeave-the facility for an attorney interview, days you are unavailable because you are transfemed to another facility and days j )u are
unavailable due to your absence from the facility for any purpose.The three(3)^business day periods is autoriiaticaliy extende'd by one(1)business day if i ju are
transferred tb anotherfacility priorto your hearing(unless you are a Pre-Hearing Detention Inmate). Commencementofa hearing afterthree(3)business days ifl atthe
discretion ofthe Adjudication Captain and is not barred by Department mles.
At your hearing you have thefollowing riglits: ; ^ ^ ^ ^ ^
I Rightto appearpersonally,unless you waive yourrightto^pear,refuse to attend the hearing orappearatthehedring and becoitifc disruptive
2. Rightto makestatements.Ifyou choosetorem^nsilent,yoursilencecannot be used againstyou.Ifyou make astatementjsuchstatement
cannotbe used in asubsequentcriminal trial unless you have been given a;Miranda Warning and the voluntarilytestily.
3. Right to present material evidence.
4. Right to present witnesses.
5. Right to the assistance ofa Hearing Facilitator.
6. Right to an interpreter ifyou cannotcommunicate wellenough in English.
7. Right to appeal.
Within twenty-four hours of the Adjudication Captain reaching a decision of guilt>', you will receive a copy of the "NOTICE OF DISCIPLINARY HE
DISi'OSniON"form informing you ofthe violation(s) you are found guilty of, the basis for that finding,the evidence relied upon and the penalty to be ■—~-
follovving penalties are the maximum, which may be imposed individually or in any combination.
Reprimand '
Loss ofall privileges * " - ' •' |
Loss of all good time ifyou are a sentence inmate.
Punitive segregation for up to thirty (30) days per each applicable individual"charge. * ' j
Restitution for the Intentionally damaging or destroying City property. . , • •»<. « - !
A Twenty-five ($25) dollar disciplinary surcharge will be imposed on all inmates found-^ilty^ofa Grade I or Grade II offense. . . • ' .
Yqu have the right to appeal an adverse decision rendered by the Adjudication Captain.
J^ING
imposH. The
Interpreter Requested: □ Yes (Ifyes, include what language)_
i Icaring l-acilitator Requested: Q Yes □ No
□ No
Wiuicss (cs) Requested
Witness (Print Name.)_
Wiine.ss (Print Name.)
Witness (Print Name.)
Witness (Print Name.)
i eeriify that I received a copy
of this Notice
□ Yes (Ifyes. Include witness(es) Name, Book and Case Number (ifinmate)
Or Shield/ID (ifstafQ and location (if inmate) or Post (ifstaff).
B&C Number:
□ No
Location:
B&C Number Location:
B&C Number: Location
Shield/ID Number:
Signature of I
Served by^ipt Name, Rank, Smeid #)
JLnn«.3o^
ReTused (TrSign for Notice: I I Yes |/No
Signatur
Witness
DISTRIBUTION: (SINGLE SIDED) COPY - NOTICE TO INMATE (DOUBLE SIDED WITH FORM 6500b) COPY TO FACILITY