2014 scelc colloquium dda update

•Download as PPTX, PDF•

0 likes•352 views

The document summarizes usage data from a Demand-Driven Acquisitions e-book program at a university over a 5 month period. It found that 57 titles were automatically purchased after being short-term loaned 5 times, with many of these titles seeing continued use. Students accounted for 89% of usage, while 20% of faculty and 18% of students used a title at least once. The majority of titles and usage were in the arts and humanities discipline. Usage peaked during weekday evenings and declined during winter break.

SCELC Colloquium – March 5, 2014

Maria Savova
Collection Management
& Digital Integration Librarian

3500

3000

526
(8%)

2500
2000
1500

2866
(44%)

2598
(40%)

1000

500
478 (7%)

0
Free browses

STLs
Paid

Free

Autopurchase

57 (7%)







1 STL – 1594 titles (78%)
2 STLs – 237 titles (12%)
3 STLs – 66 titles (3%)
4 STLs – 83 titles (4%)
Autopurchased (on 5th paid use) – 57 titles (3%)
 47 titles used again after autopurchase:
▪ 28 titles used between 1 and 10 times
▪ 13 titles used between 11 and 20 times
▪ 5 titles used between 25 and 73 times

 Of the 10 titles not used again after autopurchase, half

were purchased in Feb.

5783

The average number
of uses per individual
user is:
3.65 for faculty,
4.64 for students,
3.34 for staff

89% of all use comes from students,
8% from faculty,
3% from staff.

20% of all faculty on campus and
18% of all students have used a
DDA e-book at least once.
1247
544
149
Faculty

177

53
Students
# of unique users

Staff
# of uses

Unique titles by discipline
70.00%

1648
(61.42%)

60.00%

50.00%

40.00%

30.00%

20.00%

565
(21.06%)

470
(17.52%)

10.00%

0.00%

AH

SS

ST

Unique titles by subject
25.00%

523

20.00%

444

15.00%
10.00%
5.00%
0.00%

257

206 179
68
30 53 11

19

73

123
28

183
1

22

142

124

94
24 27

2

50

Titles and number of uses by year of
publication

3000

2762

2500

2000
1610
1500

1337
1108

1000

859
669

500

0

352
5 3

2 2

4 3

5 2

3 1

8 2

9 4

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2008

2009

137

13 6

2001

449

Uses by year of publication

2010

2011

2012

Titles by year of publication

2013

76

2014

Titles and number of uses by publisher
2000

1854

1800

Average number of uses per title varies between 2 and 3 for most publishers.
Notable exception – NYU Press with 5.57 average uses per title

1600
1400
1200
1000
800
600
400
200

902
742
389

694
295

322
115

310
189

301
123

195
35

162
60

159
48

143
47

0

Uses by publisher

Titles by publisher

142
70

132
41

125
37

123
44

85 37

Sep 27 - Dec 23; Jan 21-Feb 25 (During the semester)
9.00%
8.00%
7.00%
6.00%
5.00%
4.00%
3.00%
2.00%
1.00%
0.00%
8-9
am

9-10 10-11 11 am 12-1
am am - 12 pm
pm

1-2
pm

2-3
pm

3-4
pm

4-5
pm

5-6
pm

6-7
pm

7-8
pm

8-9
pm

9-10 10-11 11 12-1
pm pm pm - am
12 am

1-2
am

2-3
am

3-4
am

4-5
am

5-6
am

6-7
am

7-8
am

1-2
am

2-3
am

3-4
am

4-5
am

5-6
am

6-7
am

7-8
am

Dec 24 - Jan 20 (Winter break)
14%
12%
10%
8%
6%
4%
2%
0%
8-9
am

9-10 10-11 11 am 12-1
am am - 12 pm
pm

1-2
pm

2-3
pm

3-4
pm

4-5
pm

5-6
pm

6-7
pm

7-8
pm

8-9
pm

9-10 10-11 11 12-1
pm pm pm - am
12 am

QUESTIONS?
maria_savova@cuc.claremont.edu

"Storified" version of key metrics to explain the Icelandic environment for innovation and entrepreneurship. The purpose of this presentation is to put the Icelandic innovation environment in perspective, also for those that may not be intimately familiar with Icelandic society or economy. The presentation is prepared in relation to Iceland's participation in MIT's Regional Entrepreneurship Acceleration Program (REAP) and is still work in process.

By: Raziel LucagboGuevarra Institute of Technology

Beyond the basics veam 2017

Young Lives Oxford

Measuring Postsecondary Employment Outcomes

Ohio Education Research Center

Filling the physical or the virtual stacks? Assessing the value of electronic...

Maria Savova

As libraries’ e-books collections reach critical mass, there is a growing need to assess their value, not only with respect to cost, but also in comparison with the print book collections. Do library users tend to prefer print or e-books? What factors influence those choices? To answer these questions and to help focus our collection development strategies, Claremont Colleges Library conducted a comparative usage study in three stages - across three semesters, focusing on a sample of Course Adopted Books containing the same titles, available in both print and electronic format. These samples represent a unique research opportunity to examine and contrast the usage statistics for each of the two formats, while reducing the variations in preference due to factors like desirability and relevancy of the content, or nature and urgency of the information need. This presentation will reveal some of the most interesting and unexpected results that emerged from the third stage of the study and compare them with the data from the first two stages. It will also examine the methodology used to compare usage of print to electronic books, and the presenter hopes to provoke a discussion regarding her approach, given the challenges of working with data of different nature.

Saying goodbye to the electronic resources fund: Restructuring the library bu...Maria Savova

Your library has that book! Assessment of the course adopted books service in...Maria Savova

Assessment of e-book strategies - CNI Spring 2014

Maria Savova

What do we know about the use and acceptance of e-books by students and faculty? At the December CNI Executive Roundtable, “E-book Strategies,” several institutions reported on data collection efforts to assist them in better understanding the use of and satisfaction with e-books among their constituencies. In this session, findings from three institutions provide insight into the kinds of information collected, what the data revealed, and the impact of these studies on policies and strategic directions.

E-books have been an integral part of library collections for a long time now, but they are still surrounded by controversy. How much our patrons really use them? That seemingly simple question has a very complicated answer that could depend on a number of factors. The e-books’ usage reports mean very little on their own and leave many unanswered questions. In order to contextualize the usage statistics, the Claremont Colleges Library conducted an analysis of enhanced usage reports in comparison with the total offerings of e-book content available to our users from all major providers, and through all access models. The study aimed to measure turnover rates and shed light on what is not being used, gauge usage (and non-usage) patterns by subject area and publication year, as well as determine the impact, if any, of the different access models. In addition, we compared the subject composition and the age of the e-book collection to the print book collection, and analyzed the usage patterns in the two formats within calendar 2014. This presentation will highlight the most important findings of the study and discuss their implications for future collection management.

Levine-Clark, Michael and Kari Paulson, “E-Book Usage on a Global Scale: Patt...

Michael Levine-Clark

Borrow vs. Click: comparing the usage of print and e-book equivalents of Cour...

Maria Savova

Does format matter? Reading preferences in an academic library context

Jen Robertson

Presented at the Charleston Conference on November 6, 2015. At the University of Toronto Libraries, we analyzed usage data for scholarly monographs from three key university presses, covering thousands of titles over several years of publication. By comparing print and ebook usage patterns of identical titles, our goal was to examine format preferences, investigate whether use of one format is linked to the other, and determine if there are differences in usage across subject disciplines or publishers.

2015 Community Benchmark Report

Higher Logic

Higher Logic, the leading cloud-based community platform, hosted the second 2015 Higher Logic Learning Series session called: Prove Value with Analytics, Benchmarking and Engagement Reporting on Tuesday, June 30. Higher Logic's President and Chief Customer Officer, Andy Steggles, discussed the results from the 2015 Community Benchmarking Report Highlights included the: - 50+ engagement metrics you can use to find trends and opportunities - New ways to measure engagement and benchmark your organization - What the highest scoring organizations are doing to grow engagement - How and where to use this year's report to make an impact

Library Liaison Responsibilities

Elisabeth Leonard

Liaison responsibilitiesElisabeth Leonard

Combine & Conquer: Assessing the Components of a Comprehensive Book Acquisiti...

Maria Savova

With the advent of e-journals and other electronic content, the centrality of print books within library collections was challenged. At the same time, internet-based technologies made it easier and faster to discover and acquire both print and e-books. Today there is a much wider variety of book acquisition modes than ever before and they differ significantly in number of accessible titles per acquisition dollar. However, flat or declining library budgets, along with increases in electronic journal subscription rates, put downward pressure on monograph funding. As a response to shrinking funding and increasing researcher expectations of immediate access to a greater wealth of information, many academic libraries are changing the way they think about collections. The emphasis is now moving towards access over ownership, as well as towards data-driven approaches to selection and acquisition of the most relevant books in print and electronic formats. Given this landscape, it is crucial for libraries to define a well-reasoned, comprehensive strategy that represents an optimal mix of all available acquisition modes. Each library’s strategy should reflect its institutional priorities relative to content quality and availability, usability, permanence, as well as cost-related factors such as individual purchase price, overall affordability, and predictability. Attendees will explore a comprehensive book acquisition strategy that employs multiple approaches to maximizing access within a sustainable financial model. The relative advantages and trade-offs associated with each component of the strategy will be discussed based on their value to The Claremont Colleges Library and its users. Each attendee will gain valuable takeaways that will provide them with the tools to customize the strategy to their library’s priorities.

Defining a Comprehensive E-book Acquisition Strategy

Maria Savova

Don't stop the presses! Study of Short-Term Return on Investment on Print Boo...

Maria Savova

How long are we willing to wait for a book to demonstrate value? How many circulations are enough? Today, there is more pressure to show return on investment (ROI) than there used to be thirty, twenty, or even ten years ago. In the era of increasingly electronic, demand-driven, and evidence-based collection development, the once reigning print book is ceding its central place within library collections. While faculty and students are showing renewed interest in print materials, flat or declining library budgets, along with inevitable increases in electronic subscription rates, put downward pressure on print monograph funding. Libraries continue to develop their print book collections, however, we need to develop a data-driven approach to guide selection and acquisition of the most relevant print books. The Claremont Colleges Library conducted a short-term ROI study comparing recent print books acquired under three different acquisition modes: approval autoship, demand-driven purchase, and librarian selection. We looked at short-term ROI averages for each acquisition mode, including how long it takes for a book to circulate for the first time and how many times books circulate within the first year after acquisition. We also reviewed the number of books, overall expenditure per acquisition mode, and disciplinary distribution of print book acquisitions from a historical perspective, exploring how the proportions of expenditure between print approval and firm ordering changed at the advent of demand-driven purchasing and the proliferation of e-books. The audience will learn how this study’s findings are informing our budgeting strategies and future collection development.

Dismantle Your Electronic Resources Fund! Applying The Power of Faceted Class...

Maria Savova

Effective collection management and funding advocacy require that academic library materials budgets reflect the complexity of their underlying acquisitions. We introduce a faceted budget structure that addresses acquisition mode, material type, material format, and discipline in each fund-- thereby empowering budget transparency, reliable ongoing spending control, and accurate long-term planning.

Can your budget keep up with the electronic era? Restructuring the academic l...

Maria Savova

Most academic libraries are facing funding challenges that necessitate improved budget planning, monitoring, and communication. Moreover, electronic resources have led to substantial growth in the complexity of the content that libraries acquire as well as the variety of means of acquiring them. The simultaneous intensification of these two trends has taxed the traditional two-dimensional budget structure to the point that it has become inadequate. In the electronic era, libraries are in need of an expanded budget structure that accounts for the four critical aspects of the acquisitions process and is able to provide transparency and visibility, support long-term planning and ongoing spending control, as well as facilitate reporting and advocacy. This presentation describes the shortcomings of the current academic library acquisitions budget structure, identifies the components of the optimal acquisitions budget, and describes a generalized process that any library can use to update and tailor its budget structure for the electronic resources environment. The case study we present provides a detailed example of the effectively restructured budget at the Claremont Colleges Library and the advantages it provides in practice. We expect that it will be of practical use to anyone involved in acquisitions and collection management in an academic library.

Making Value Judgments: E-Book Pricing for Access and Ownership. Electronic R...

Maria Savova

Choosing how to deliver ebooks to our users is no easy task. There are many different publisher and vendor platforms, and there are just as many access models. A librarian that wants to build a broad ebook collection must consider multiple platforms and models. This choice inevitably involves a decision about access to a wide range of content through DDA or subscription packages versus the security of ownership. It is clear that DDA and subscriptions allow far more titles to be made available to a library’s users. This study explores the value of the various access models by measuring usage, cost, and holdings at both the local and consortial level.

Saying goodbye to the electronic resources fund

Maria Savova

The literature and discussion regarding library budgets usually focusses on methods and formulas for allocating funds among the different subject areas. However, little attention is being paid to the structure of the funds within those subject areas. This presentation will introduce new concepts and a new way of thinking about the Library budget as more than just a way of spending funds, but also as a tool for planning and reporting, for both management and selectors

Mobile technology and information literacy instruction: the McGill Library ex...Maria Savova

Promoting e books to students in an academic library

Maria Savova

Palestine last event orientationfvgnh .pptx

RaedMohamed3

June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...

Levi Shapiro

Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg, The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation. This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability. Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots. The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee. • The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act. • The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X. • The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202

Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptx

timhan337

Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdf

Thiyagu K

Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism

DeeptiGupta154

special B.ed 2nd year old paper_20240531.pdf

Special education needs

Similar to 2014 scelc colloquium dda update

Interpret the numbers: Putting e-book usage statistics in context

Maria Savova

Levine-Clark, Michael and Kari Paulson, “E-Book Usage on a Global Scale: Patt...

Michael Levine-Clark

Borrow vs. Click: comparing the usage of print and e-book equivalents of Cour...

Maria Savova

Does format matter? Reading preferences in an academic library context

Jen Robertson

2015 Community Benchmark Report

Higher Logic

Library Liaison Responsibilities

Elisabeth Leonard

Liaison responsibilitiesElisabeth Leonard

Similar to 2014 scelc colloquium dda update (7)

Interpret the numbers: Putting e-book usage statistics in context

Levine-Clark, Michael and Kari Paulson, “E-Book Usage on a Global Scale: Patt...

Borrow vs. Click: comparing the usage of print and e-book equivalents of Cour...

Does format matter? Reading preferences in an academic library context

2015 Community Benchmark Report

Library Liaison Responsibilities

Liaison responsibilities

Recently uploaded

Palestine last event orientationfvgnh .pptx

RaedMohamed3

June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...

Levi Shapiro

Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptx

timhan337

Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdf

Thiyagu K

Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism

DeeptiGupta154

special B.ed 2nd year old paper_20240531.pdf

Special education needs

Embracing GenAI - A Strategic Imperative

Peter Windle

Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction. This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.

"Protectable subject matters, Protection in biotechnology, Protection of othe...

SACHIN R KONDAGURI

Thesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.ppt

EverAndrsGuerraGuerr

Polish students' mobility in the Czech Republic

Anna Sz.

2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...

Sandy Millin

http://sandymillin.wordpress.com/iateflwebinar2024 Published classroom materials form the basis of syllabuses, drive teacher professional development, and have a potentially huge influence on learners, teachers and education systems. All teachers also create their own materials, whether a few sentences on a blackboard, a highly-structured fully-realised online course, or anything in between. Despite this, the knowledge and skills needed to create effective language learning materials are rarely part of teacher training, and are mostly learnt by trial and error. Knowledge and skills frameworks, generally called competency frameworks, for ELT teachers, trainers and managers have existed for a few years now. However, until I created one for my MA dissertation, there wasn’t one drawing together what we need to know and do to be able to effectively produce language learning materials. This webinar will introduce you to my framework, highlighting the key competencies I identified from my research. It will also show how anybody involved in language teaching (any language, not just English!), teacher training, managing schools or developing language learning materials can benefit from using the framework.

Operation Blue Star - Saka Neela Tara

Balvir Singh

Operation “Blue Star” is the only event in the history of Independent India where the state went into war with its own people. Even after about 40 years it is not clear if it was culmination of states anger over people of the region, a political game of power or start of dictatorial chapter in the democratic setup. The people of Punjab felt alienated from main stream due to denial of their just demands during a long democratic struggle since independence. As it happen all over the word, it led to militant struggle with great loss of lives of military, police and civilian personnel. Killing of Indira Gandhi and massacre of innocent Sikhs in Delhi and other India cities was also associated with this movement.

Phrasal Verbs.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

MIRIAMSALINAS13

Guidance_and_Counselling.pdf B.Ed. 4th Semester

Atul Kumar Singh

Supporting (UKRI) OA monographs at Salford.pptx

Jisc

TESDA TM1 REVIEWER FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...

EugeneSaldivar

The Accursed House by Émile Gaboriau.pptx

DhatriParmar

Sha'Carri Richardson Presentation 202345

beazzy04

Francesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptx

EduSkills OECD

CLASS 11 CBSE B.St Project AIDS TO TRADE - INSURANCE

BhavyaRajput3

Recently uploaded (20)

Palestine last event orientationfvgnh .pptx

June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...

Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptx

Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdf

Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism

special B.ed 2nd year old paper_20240531.pdf

Embracing GenAI - A Strategic Imperative

"Protectable subject matters, Protection in biotechnology, Protection of othe...

Thesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.ppt

Polish students' mobility in the Czech Republic

2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...

Operation Blue Star - Saka Neela Tara

Phrasal Verbs.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Guidance_and_Counselling.pdf B.Ed. 4th Semester

Supporting (UKRI) OA monographs at Salford.pptx

TESDA TM1 REVIEWER FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...

The Accursed House by Émile Gaboriau.pptx

Sha'Carri Richardson Presentation 202345

Francesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptx

CLASS 11 CBSE B.St Project AIDS TO TRADE - INSURANCE

2014 scelc colloquium dda update

1. SCELC Colloquium – March 5, 2014 Maria Savova Collection Management & Digital Integration Librarian

3.  ~50,000 DDA titles from EBL (updating profile + manual additions)  5 Months: Oct 2013 – Feb 2014  Autopurchase on 5th short term loan (STL)  List price of titles used $347,600  Spent $32,650 (9.3%):  57 autopurchases @ $ 5,764  2598 STLs @ $ 26,888

4. 3500 3000 526 (8%) 2500 2000 1500 2866 (44%) 2598 (40%) 1000 500 478 (7%) 0 Free browses STLs Paid Free Autopurchase 57 (7%)

5.      1 STL – 1594 titles (78%) 2 STLs – 237 titles (12%) 3 STLs – 66 titles (3%) 4 STLs – 83 titles (4%) Autopurchased (on 5th paid use) – 57 titles (3%)  47 titles used again after autopurchase: ▪ 28 titles used between 1 and 10 times ▪ 13 titles used between 11 and 20 times ▪ 5 titles used between 25 and 73 times  Of the 10 titles not used again after autopurchase, half were purchased in Feb.

6. 5783 The average number of uses per individual user is: 3.65 for faculty, 4.64 for students, 3.34 for staff 89% of all use comes from students, 8% from faculty, 3% from staff. 20% of all faculty on campus and 18% of all students have used a DDA e-book at least once. 1247 544 149 Faculty 177 53 Students # of unique users Staff # of uses

7. Unique titles by discipline 70.00% 1648 (61.42%) 60.00% 50.00% 40.00% 30.00% 20.00% 565 (21.06%) 470 (17.52%) 10.00% 0.00% AH SS ST

8. Unique titles by subject 25.00% 523 20.00% 444 15.00% 10.00% 5.00% 0.00% 257 206 179 68 30 53 11 19 73 123 28 183 1 22 142 124 94 24 27 2 50

9. Titles and number of uses by year of publication 3000 2762 2500 2000 1610 1500 1337 1108 1000 859 669 500 0 352 5 3 2 2 4 3 5 2 3 1 8 2 9 4 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2008 2009 137 13 6 2001 449 Uses by year of publication 2010 2011 2012 Titles by year of publication 2013 76 2014

10. Titles and number of uses by publisher 2000 1854 1800 Average number of uses per title varies between 2 and 3 for most publishers. Notable exception – NYU Press with 5.57 average uses per title 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 902 742 389 694 295 322 115 310 189 301 123 195 35 162 60 159 48 143 47 0 Uses by publisher Titles by publisher 142 70 132 41 125 37 123 44 85 37

11. Sep 27 - Dec 23; Jan 21-Feb 25 (During the semester) 9.00% 8.00% 7.00% 6.00% 5.00% 4.00% 3.00% 2.00% 1.00% 0.00% 8-9 am 9-10 10-11 11 am 12-1 am am - 12 pm pm 1-2 pm 2-3 pm 3-4 pm 4-5 pm 5-6 pm 6-7 pm 7-8 pm 8-9 pm 9-10 10-11 11 12-1 pm pm pm - am 12 am 1-2 am 2-3 am 3-4 am 4-5 am 5-6 am 6-7 am 7-8 am 1-2 am 2-3 am 3-4 am 4-5 am 5-6 am 6-7 am 7-8 am Dec 24 - Jan 20 (Winter break) 14% 12% 10% 8% 6% 4% 2% 0% 8-9 am 9-10 10-11 11 am 12-1 am am - 12 pm pm 1-2 pm 2-3 pm 3-4 pm 4-5 pm 5-6 pm 6-7 pm 7-8 pm 8-9 pm 9-10 10-11 11 12-1 pm pm pm - am 12 am

12. QUESTIONS? maria_savova@cuc.claremont.edu

2014 scelc colloquium dda update

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Similar to 2014 scelc colloquium dda update

Similar to 2014 scelc colloquium dda update (7)

More from Maria Savova

More from Maria Savova (9)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

2014 scelc colloquium dda update